Discuss the legal issues surrounding the use of and display of information contained on social media.

Answer:

The election of the president and the vice president of the United States is an indirect election in which citizens of the United States who are registered to vote in one of the fifty U.S. states or in Washington, D.C., cast ballots not directly for those offices, but instead for members of the Electoral College.

Answer:

the presidential election is a election where everybody votes for there choice of president.

Explanation:

This happens every four years on the first tuesday in november.

Answer:

14

Explanation:

In the 19th century, in England, John Bell was hung at age 14 for killing 2 people.

Answer:

There are 535 members.

Explanation:

Five delegates and one resident commissioner serve as non-voting members of the House, although they can vote in committee.

Answer:

435

Explanation:

commissioner serve as non-voting members of the House

Answer:

Some prosecutors also use plea bargains as a way to encourage defendants to testify against codefendants or other accused criminals. Plea bargains allow prosecutors to avoid trials, which are shunned because they are time-consuming, labour-intensive, and costly but carry no guarantee of success.

Explanation:

The Reynolds Case decision equated Mormon marriage practices with Medieval Christian customs. The correct option is C.

Mormon marriage practices were compared to Christian traditions from the Middle Ages in the Reynolds Case ruling. The United States Supreme Court ruled in Reynolds v. United States (1878) that the First Amendment's freedom of religion provision did not protect the practice of polygamy by members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter day Saints commonly known as Mormons.

The Court compared the historical practice of polygamy in ancient societies and some medieval Christian sects to that of Mormonism. It was argued that although religious convictions were protected, some religious practices like polygamy, were viewed negatively and might be outlawed by the state. Therefore, as part of its legal justification in the case, the Court connected Mormon marriage practices to medieval Christian traditions.

Learn more about Reynolds Case at:

brainly.com/question/30090656

#SPJ4

Answer:

B. issueExplanation:I just took the test

Answer:hate crime I think

Explanation:

It is because of Lack of employment equality, Job segregation, Lack of legal protections, Lack of political representation etc.

Learn more about gender inequality refer to :

https://brainly.com/question/1087314

#SPJ1

Answer:

I may not be 100% correct but I believe its B

Answer:BrhfdjExplanation:shut up brainly admin is trash

Answer:

A company limited by guarantee does not have any shares or shareholders (like the more common limited by shares structure) but is owned by guarantors who agree to pay a set amount of money towards company debts.

Answer:

1 and 5

Explanation:

Among the six children tested, Child 1 and Child 5 are the fraternal twins that are born to Mr. & Mrs. Jones. :)

There are a lot of human rights.  The right that protects your purchase  is right to redress.

In terms of business, Consumers also have the right to be compensated when they have cases such as misrepresentation, shoddy goods and unsatisfactory services. This helps to remove doubt and makes sure there is credibility of the producers and the goods being produced are of quality.

Learn more about right to redress from

https://brainly.com/question/3884093

Answer:

right to redress

Explanation:

lol

A system of constitutional law sets the framework for the system of government and defines the authority and procedure of political bodies to establish laws and regulations.

Constitutional refers to anything linked to a constitution, which is a basic document that specifies the authorities and functions of various institutions and levels of government and outlines individuals' rights and freedoms. Constitutional law is the corpus of legislation that controls how a constitution is interpreted and applied. It incorporates ideas such as power separation, checks and balances, and the protection of individual rights and liberties. The constitution is the highest law in a constitutional democracy, and all other laws and regulations must be consistent with it.

For such more question on Constitution:

https://brainly.com/question/453546

#SPJ4

Answer:

The judiciary is the system of courts that interprets, defends, and applies the law in the name of the state. The judiciary can also be thought of as the mechanism for the resolution of disputes. Under the doctrine of the separation of powers, the judiciary generally does not make statutory law (which is the responsibility of the legislature) or enforce law (which is the responsibility of the executive), but rather interprets, defends, and applies the law to the facts of each case. However, in some countries the judiciary does make common law.

In many jurisdictions the judicial branch has the power to change laws through the process of judicial review. Courts with judicial review power may annul the laws and rules of the state when it finds them incompatible with a higher norm, such as primary legislation, the provisions of the constitution, treaties or international law. Judges constitute a critical force for interpretation and implementation of a constitution, thus in common law countries creating the body of constitutional law.

Explanation:

Answer:

The judicial system, aka branch, decides on how laws will help the citizens in real life situations, and whether or not it will break the Constitution.

Explanation:

pls mark brainiest and hope you have a great day! ;)

Under the U.S. system of government, the judiciary has the power to interpret the constitutionality of laws and nominate Justices to the Supreme Court.

Under the U.S. system of government, the judiciary does not have the power to create legislation. That authority is granted to the legislative branch of government, specifically Congress. The judiciary's primary role is to interpret and apply the law, including the Constitution. They have the power to interpret the constitutionality of laws, which means they can determine whether a law complies with the provisions of the Constitution. This power is known as judicial review. Additionally, the judiciary does not enforce laws using police powers. Law enforcement falls under the executive branch, which includes agencies such as the police and the Department of Justice. However, the judiciary does play a role in interpreting laws and ensuring their enforcement through the adjudication of cases. The President, as part of the executive branch, has the authority to nominate Justices to the Supreme Court, but those nominations must be confirmed by the Senate.

For more such question on Supreme Court

https://brainly.com/question/31448958

#SPJ

Answer:

Cultural stereotypes are generalizations or assumptions people make about individuals or groups based on race, ethnicity, religion, gender, or other cultural characteristics. These stereotypes can hurt decision-making in criminal justice settings, such as during police investigations, jury selection, and sentencing.

One of the ways that cultural stereotypes can negatively influence decision-making is through racial profiling. Police officers may make assumptions about individuals based on their race or ethnicity, leading to unfair treatment, such as being stopped and searched without cause or being treated with more suspicion than other individuals.

Cultural stereotypes can also impact jury selection and the verdicts that are reached. Jurors may hold biases or assumptions about individuals based on their cultural background, which can lead to wrongful convictions or acquittals. For example, a juror may assume that a defendant from a certain cultural background is likelier to commit a certain crime, even if there is no evidence to support this claim.

In addition, cultural stereotypes can impact sentencing decisions. Judges may have preconceived notions about individuals based on their cultural background, which can lead to harsher or more lenient sentences. For example, a judge may believe that a defendant from a specific cultural background is more likely to be violent and, therefore may impose a harsher sentence than they would for someone from a different background who committed the same crime.

Cultural stereotypes can negatively influence decision-making in criminal justice settings by leading to unfair treatment, wrongful convictions, and unequal sentencing. Criminal justice professionals need to be aware of these biases and work to mitigate their impact on decision-making. This can include education and training on cultural competence and efforts to increase diversity and representation within the criminal justice system.

Cultural stereotypes can have a detrimental impact on decision-making in criminal justice settings due to the biases they create. These stereotypes are preconceived notions or generalizations about individuals based on their race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or other cultural factors.

When these stereotypes influence decision-making in the criminal justice system, several negative consequences can occur:

1. Racial Profiling: Cultural stereotypes can lead to racial profiling, where law enforcement officers or other criminal justice professionals target individuals from specific racial or ethnic backgrounds based on assumptions or biases. This can result in unwarranted stops, searches, arrests, and disproportionate scrutiny of certain groups, regardless of individual behavior or evidence.

2. Unfair Treatment: Stereotypes can affect how suspects, defendants, witnesses, and victims are treated throughout the criminal justice process. When decision-makers hold prejudiced views, they may unconsciously or consciously treat individuals differently, leading to unjust outcomes.

3. Bias in Charging and Sentencing: Stereotypes can impact charging decisions and sentencing recommendations. For example, a prosecutor may be more likely to pursue harsher charges against a person from a specific cultural background based on stereotypes, even if the evidence does not support it.

4. Jury Bias: Stereotypes can influence jurors' perceptions and judgments during trials, affecting the fairness of the jury's decision. Biases may affect the credibility and sympathy given to witnesses or defendants, potentially leading to biased verdicts.

5. Resource Allocation: Cultural stereotypes can also affect resource allocation within the criminal justice system. Certain communities may receive more scrutiny or resources based on stereotypes, while others may be overlooked or underserved.

6. Impact on Rehabilitation: Stereotypes can influence decisions regarding parole, probation, or diversion programs, potentially hindering the successful rehabilitation and reintegration of individuals back into society.

7. Public Perception: When cultural stereotypes influence decision-making, it can erode public trust in the criminal justice system. Communities that feel unfairly targeted or treated are less likely to cooperate with law enforcement or participate fully in the legal process.

Addressing and mitigating the influence of cultural stereotypes in criminal justice settings is crucial for ensuring fairness, equity, and justice. Training law enforcement officers, judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and other stakeholders in cultural competency and unconscious bias awareness can help reduce the impact of stereotypes on decision-making. Implementing policies and procedures that promote objectivity, transparency, and accountability can also contribute to more equitable outcomes in the criminal justice system.

To know more about Cultural stereotypes:

https://brainly.com/question/31064678

#SPJ2

It is expected that one should be looking ahead of as far as the car in front of you on a on a city street.

These are sub-roads that connect the houses in the inner city to the main road networks.

Hence, while driving, It is expected that one should be looking ahead of as far as the car in front of you on a on a city street.

Read more about city street

brainly.com/question/25404428

#SPJ1

The claim seems to be accurate. That implies that any attempts to register duplicates (more than once) for a given market would be rejected.

Depending on the situation, the word "market" might indicate many things. A market is typically used to describe a certain business or sector where products or services are bought and sold. It may also refer to the region or demographic segment where a good or service is marketed or offered for sale. In business and economics, the idea of a market is crucial because it influences supply and demand, pricing, and competition. In some situations, the word "market" can also refer to a system or platform where transactions are carried out, such a stock exchange or an online marketplace. Creating a winning company plan and achieving commercial success require an understanding of the market.

Learn more about market here:

https://brainly.com/question/13627328

#SPJ4

Answer:

i think its false to be honest....sorry if incorrect

Check the "under 21 Until" date and as long as the date of birth shows the customer's age to be 21 years or older and the Driver's License is still valid, it is a valid ID to purchase alcohol.

Explanation:

sorry if this is wrong

but

Texas law does not state that a person over the age of 21 must provide proof of age for alcohol purchases. There is no specific form of ID considered “valid” under state law. You will not be charged with a crime if the minor misrepresents his / her age with an ID that is: Issued by a government agency.

Answer:

For a contract to be legally binding it must contain four essential elements:

an offer

an acceptance

an intention to create a legal relationship

a consideration (usually money).

However it may still be considered invalid if it:

entices someone to commit a crime, or is illegal

is entered into by someone that lacks capacity, such as a minor or bankrupt

was agreed through misleading or deceptive conduct, duress, unconscionable conduct or undue influence.

Simply put, it implies that, depending on the court's organizational hierarchy, the judgments reached by judges in earlier, analogous cases are binding on later cases.

As a result, where a case contains comparable substantial circumstances to a case that has been determined by a higher court, a lower court is required by precedent to adopt that judgment. A court is required to follow the ratio of any judgment made by a court further up in the hierarchy, whether or not the decision is correct

learn more about court rules here:

https://brainly.com/question/14566452  

#SPJ4

The statement that 'the Clayton Act was enacted in 1914 to strengthen the antitrust laws under the Sherman Act' is true. It complemented the Sherman Act by providing a more comprehensive framework to address anticompetitive practices.

The Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 is a United States antitrust law that regulates competition and monopolies. It is named after Senator William Alden Smith and Representative Henry De Lamar Clayton, who were the act's authors. It bans monopolistic behaviour, price fixing, and exclusive dealings and ties. It made illegal a variety of business activities that the Supreme Court had previously stated were not covered by the Sherman Antitrust Act.

The Clayton Act also stipulated that businesses could not acquire the stock of competing corporations if doing so would result in reduced competition. It stipulated that if a company's merger or acquisition activity would "substantially lessen competition," the government had the authority to halt the activity.

Hence, the Clayton Act aimed to prevent specific business practices that could potentially lead to a reduction in competition, such as price discrimination, exclusive dealing agreements, and corporate mergers that could lessen competition. Thus, the statement is true.

Learn more about Clayton Antitrust Act:

https://brainly.com/question/14684775

#SPJ11

Courts have ruled that inmates are entitled to have legal materials and resources available to assist them in filing complaints. The legal materials and resources include access to the law library and legal help.

Courts are a central part of the United States government's justice system. Courts have the responsibility of hearing cases and deciding what should be done with them.

They make judgments based on the evidence presented in court and the law that applies to the case. Inmates are individuals who have been imprisoned. They are kept in correctional facilities for varying lengths of time depending on the severity of the crime committed.

Inmates are often viewed as being separated from the outside world and are subject to different rules and regulations than those on the outside. Legal materials and resources refer to the tools and materials that are available to help individuals navigate the legal system.

Courts have ruled that inmates are entitled to have legal materials and resources available to assist them in filing complaints, which includes access to the law library and legal help.

Learn more about court legal materials https://brainly.com/question/31051529

#SPJ11

Answer:

heading and the title block of the sketch

Explanation:

This mostly depends on the artist but most of the time the top of the page usually contains the heading and the title block of the sketch. The heading is usually the case title and the title block contains important information such as case number, date, artist name, etc. These are usually the two main items that are located at the top of the page. Underneath these points would be the diagram itself, a legend, and a Scale and direction notations (sometimes showing only north)

From George Washington until World War II, U.S. foreign policy was primarily based on isolationism and the Monroe Doctrine. Isolationism refers to the policy of avoiding entanglements in international affairs and focusing on domestic issues. This approach was advised by George Washington in his Farewell Address, where he warned against forming permanent alliances with foreign nations.

The Monroe Doctrine, introduced in 1823 by President James Monroe, aimed to prevent European nations from interfering in the affairs of the newly independent nations of the Americas. The doctrine asserted that the Western Hemisphere was off-limits to new European colonization and any attempts to do so would be considered acts of aggression. The Monroe Doctrine became a cornerstone of American foreign policy, and the U.S. used it as a justification to intervene in the affairs of Latin American countries when necessary to maintain stability in the region.

Throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries, U.S. foreign policy continued to prioritize isolationism and the principles of the Monroe Doctrine. However, certain events like the Spanish-American War and the establishment of the League of Nations demonstrated that the U.S. was becoming more involved in global affairs. It wasn't until World War II, with the bombing of Pearl Harbor, that the U.S. abandoned isolationism and took a more active role in global politics, shaping the foreign policy we recognize today.

To know more about George Washington visit:

https://brainly.com/question/354943

#SPJ11

In the twenty-two years from 1992 to 2014, the percentage of people arrested for burglary who were women increased dramatically (Option D).

Burglary is the illegal entry into a structure or other site with the intent to commit a crime. It's also known as housebreaking and breaking and entering. The majority of jurisdictions classify a number of offenses as burglary, but often this crime involves theft, robbery, or murder.

Finally, the term "burglary" now refers to entering someone else's property without their consent in order to conduct a felony there.

Learn more about burglary here: https://brainly.com/question/10411138

#SPJ1

The IRAC principle is a common legal analysis method that stands for Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion. It is used to analyse legal cases and provide a structured analysis. Here are 6 case employment laws from the Caribbean, :

1. Case Law: Gibson v. Jamaican Airline Ltd.
The issue in this case was whether the airline's policy of mandatory retirement at age 60 violated employment discrimination laws.

The case involved a claim of age discrimination under employment laws. The court applied the relevant employment discrimination laws in the Caribbean and determined whether the airline's policy was in violation of these laws.

2. Case Law: Anderson v. Trinidad & Tobago Public Service Commission
The issue in this case was whether the government's requirement for male employees to retire at age 55 but allowing female employees to retire at age 60 violated the principle of gender equality.

This case examined gender equality in employment laws. The court analysed whether the different retirement ages for male and female employees constituted discrimination based on gender.

3. Case Law: Roberts v. Barbados Hotel Association
The issue in this case was whether the hotel association's decision to terminate an employee based on their sexual orientation violated employment laws.

This case dealt with discrimination based on sexual orientation in employment. The court examined whether the employee's termination was a violation of their rights under employment laws.

4. Case Law: Martin v. Antigua and Barbuda Broadcasting Service
The issue in this case was whether the broadcasting service's refusal to provide reasonable accommodations for an employee with a disability violated employment laws.

The court analysed whether the broadcasting service's failure to provide reasonable accommodations constituted a violation of employment laws.

5. Case Law: Grant v. Cayman Islands Government
The issue in this case was whether the government's failure to pay overtime wages to certain employees violated employment laws.

This case dealt with the issue of overtime wages. The court examined whether the government's failure to pay overtime to certain employees was a violation of employment laws.

6. Case Law: Edwards v. Bahamas Maritime Authority
The issue in this case was whether the maritime authority's decision to terminate an employee based on their political affiliation violated employment laws.

This case focused on political discrimination in employment. The court analysed whether the employee's termination was a violation of their rights under employment laws.

To know more about  Employment laws, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32735711

#SPJ11