The correct answer is B. Plants and animals.
Explanation
Christopher Columbus was the Italian navigator who discovered the New World. In 1492 he requested the help of the Catholic kings of the Crown of Castile to give him three ships and resources for his first voyage. On this trip, he attempted to establish an alternative route to travel to the East Indies by encircling the entire land. Once he got the patronage of the Catholic kings he had to report every one of his discoveries to them. Once he reached the Caribbean islands, he believed that he had reached the East Indies and there he only found natural resources such as exotic plants and animals other than those of the Iberian Peninsula. However, to prevent the kings from ceasing to give him financial patronage, he decided to inform them that he had found wealth and precious metals. According to the above, the correct answer is B. Plants and animals.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Its correct
What become important to the merchants as trade increased?
land
power
religion
money
Answer: As trade increased more cash, banking, and lending services became available and more money was available for building businesses. As trading increased merchants wealth and power expanded which led to taxes increasing and the Kings power and wealth also increasing.
Explanation:
Answer:
The land became the most important thing when trading increased.
Explanation: I just took the test and it was just a quick search
Which statement best completes the diagram?
Effects of Mongol
Empire on China
New technology
develops
A period of artistic
achievement occurs
.
A. The political system is destroyed.
B. Trade with Europe expands.
C. Wars become more frequenti
D. The Silk Road falls out of use
Answer: B Trade with Europe expands.
Answer:
Trade with Europe expands
Explanation:
ITTTOA
2. Based on these cases you have read, do you think that the United States has balanced the securi
people with our right to liberty? Explain your answer.
The balance between security and individual liberty in the United States remains a subject of ongoing debate and subjective interpretation.
The balance between security and individual liberty is a complex and ongoing debate in the United States. Various actions and policies implemented by the government in the name of security have raised concerns about potential infringements on civil liberties. Examples include surveillance programs, restrictions on privacy rights, and measures taken during times of crisis. On the other hand, proponents argue that these actions are necessary to protect national security and prevent potential threats. The assessment of whether the United States has successfully balanced security and individual liberty is subjective and depends on different perspectives and interpretations of the Constitution and democratic principles.The question of whether the United States has successfully balanced security and individual liberty is a matter of ongoing debate and subjective interpretation. While some argue that certain actions in the name of security have infringed upon civil liberties, others maintain that such measures are necessary to safeguard the nation. Ultimately, achieving a balance between security and individual liberty is a delicate task that requires continuous evaluation, adherence to constitutional principles, and public scrutiny to ensure the protection of both national security and individual rights.For more questions on the United States, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/26998274
#SPJ8
Reader Tools
Info
evious
19 Save
11 v
Next
Submit Test
Post Test: The US Constitution
11
Select the correct answer.
About 20% of the bridges in Texas are unsafe and require maintenance, but the projects are stalled because there is no guarantee Congress will
help with federal funds. What does this represent about government?
ОА.
weakness of the administrative branch
OB.
strength of the administrative branch
OC.
strength of a federal system
OD.
weakness of a unitary system
OE.
weakness of a federal system
Reset
Next
Edmentum. All rights reserved.
Answer: E. weakness of a federal system
Explanation:
This is a weakness of the Federal system of government because it shows what happens when states have to become reliant on the federal government to carry out projects.
If there was no federal system, states would be more reliant on their own selves and would embark on their own projects. This means that Texas would have found a way to maintain those bridges without waiting for federal help.
How did labor unions protect workers when they went on strike?
They bargained with employers so that the workers would not simply be replaced.
They forced workers to return to work early.
They helped protect the workers from negative press.
They forced employers to end strikes.
What were some of the reasons that Christianity spread during Roman times?
HELP ASAP
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
Answer: These factors include peace in Rome, common language, good road networks, charity, and freedom from discriminating cultural norms.
Explanation:hope this helps
Under the feudal system, most of a kingdom's land was controlled by:
Answer:
Explanation: bout 12
What is the significance of the carrier pigeons? What role did they play in the war and in the battle of Argonne?
Answer:
President Wilson was a military carrier pigeon, one of many in the U.S. Army Signal Corps that delivered messages between commanders and troops on the front lines. The pigeons were especially useful tools of communication during World War I when the telephone and telegraph were still unreliable new technologies
Explanation:
Can laws influence the way people think about who belongs and who does not? How?
Laws influence the way people think about who belongs and who does will not be possible as there will be an influence on the way people will behave.
What is a law?Law is generally understood to be a collection of rules that are made and enforced by social or governmental bodies to control behavior. It has been called both science and also the practice of justice in diverse contexts
All the people will be treated equally under the law irrespective of their position and the way they will be of any gender or caste. This suggests that the law treats everyone in an equal sense.
Learn more about law, Here:
brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ9
According to the passage, what particular phrase of the Declaration of Independence affected groups that the authors never expected? A. "We the people" B. "When in the Course of human events" C. "We hold these truths to be self-evident" D. "All men are created equal"
The particular phrase of the Declaration of Independence affected groups that the authors never expected is "All men are created equal". Thus the correct option is D.
What is the Declaration of Independence?The Declaration of Independence, which was issued by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, and intended to gain support overseas and announce the formation of a new nation, declared the independence of 13 British colonies in North America from Great Britain.
The phrase of the Declaration of Independence affected groups that the authors never expected"All men are created equal" emphasizes that equal opportunities are given to every citizen despite of discrimination and prejudices.
Therefore, option D is appropriate.
Learn more about the Declaration of Independence, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28641215
#SPJ1
Theory of inspiration that says God told the writers exactly what to
say
1. Blanche Bruce and Hiram Revels were the first African Americans to hold which political post?
a. Secretary of State
b. U.S. Senator
c. U.S. House Representative
d. Supreme Court Justice
Blanche Bruce and Hiram Revels were the first African Americans to hold which political post U.S Senator.
A senator is a person who works within the authorities. within the, senators are elected through voters to symbolize them in a kingdom or federal senate. every nation within the US elects two senators who serve six-12 months terms in Washington, DC, wherein they pass legal guidelines and vote on policies.
When Senator Hiram Revels of Mississippi and representative Joseph Rainey of South Carolina became the first African Americans to serve in Congress, a total of one hundred seventy five African Americans. He changed into the first African American Senator, ever. Represented Mississippi. His election became made feasible by way of the presence of Union troops in that kingdom during the Congressional Reconstruction period. Bruce and Revels gave cash to some of white southern politicians.
The Senate fulfils its function as a take a look at on authorities by payments, delegated rules, authorities management, and authorities policy in trendy. It does this via way of tactics Utilised within the Senate chamber itself and via the operation of the Senate committee machine.
Learn more about Senator here:-https://brainly.com/question/25132339
#SPJ1
"Place yourself in the role of one of the following types of people who lived in medieval times: peasant, noble, judge, sheriff, soldier, priest, king. From the point of view of the type of person you chose, write an essay agreeing or disagreeing with the following statement: “In the Magna Carta, the nobles acted in their own interest and did not ensure that the document’s provisions would equitably help all of English citizens.” Use evidence from the Magna Carta to support your position." This is from some old student worksheet based on the Magna Carta. The amount of directions you could go with this has been driving me insane for about 2 hours so if someone has done this or could just give me an idea of how to even begin I'd be very thankful.
The question above wants to analyze your knowledge about the Magna Carta and your writing skill. For that reason, I'm going to show you how to write this essay.
First, you need to choose a person type from the types presented in the question. You can choose the peasant, because the social problems of the peasants are easier to identify, just as it is easy to identify their representation in the Magna Carta.
Then you should research the Magna Carta, the life of a peasant in medieval times, and how the magma letter impacted peasants positively and negatively.
After this research, you should reflect, from a peasant's point of view, whether you agree or disagree with the statements presented in the question.
Based on all this, you can write your essay.
Steps to write an essay:Introduction: Briefly introduce what the Magna Carta is and whether or not you agree with the information presented in the question, taking into account the person you have chosen.Body: Write two paragraphs. In the first, show the information that makes you agree or not with the statement in the Magna Carta. In the second paragraph, show how the magma letter addresses the socioeconomic problems of the person you chose.Conclusion: Summarize all your information and reinforce your opinion about the Magna Carta.More information about the Magna Carta is in the link:
https://brainly.com/question/572543
When basic human rights are violated, a call for a campaign or protest can be made. Anonymous Evaluate the National shut down protests on loadshedding held on the 20th March 2023 and the 21 March 1960 Sharpeville protests. Take note of mark allocations for each question. 3.1. Explain the purpose of both campaigns / protests. -22 Flaborate on the impact of the Sharnovillo massacro (2x2=4) 12x2-6)
Both the National shut down protests on loadshedding in 2023 and the Sharpeville protests in 1960 were significant demonstrations against violations of basic human rights.
How did the protests contribute to raising awareness about human rights violations?The National shut down protests on loadshedding held on the 20th March 2023 aimed to draw attention to the continuous power outages and the adverse impact they had on people's lives.
By organizing a national shutdown, the protestors sought to emphasize the violation of their right to access a reliable supply of electricity which is essential for a decent standard of living.
This protest disrupted daily activities and brought the issue to the forefront of public discourse, putting pressure on the authorities to address the concerns.
Read more about basic human rights
brainly.com/question/1261546
#SPJ1
dO YOU AGREE WITH PRESIDENT MONROE MAKING THE MONROE DOCTRINE
Answer:
no
Explanation:
Public officials in the Roman Republic would commission heroic, full-length statues of themselves composed of generic, well-formed bodies and
A. a realistic portrait
B. the face of a Roman god
C. a head portrait of an ancestor
D. a portrait of the reigning emperor
They would commission a heroic, full-length statues of themselves composed of generic, well-formed bodies and a realistic portrait.
Why did Roman leaders use military statues?The statues often made in marble or bronze does idealized their bodies and connections to great military commanders of the past.
Hence, the statues which is often a heroic, full-length statues of themselves is composed of generic, well-formed bodies and a realistic portrait.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about military statues
brainly.com/question/5598933
#SPJ1
Why does Lincoln refer to the founding fathers?
Answer:
To relate because they also fought in war. ... What lesson does Lincoln say we can learn from this battle? To continue to fight.
Explanation:
Answer:
To relate because they also fought in the war.
Explanation:
Lincoln had referred to “the Union” twenty times. Always using “the Union” as a synonym for the country, Lincoln had not once referred to “the nation.” But by the end of 1863, Lincoln’s rhetoric changed significantly. He now referred to the founders of 1776 as having “brought forth on this continent a new nation.” Only a united nation with a strong central government, he believed, could end slavery and protect liberty.
senator george f hoar argued that the united states should not annex territories because it was
Answer:
Senator George F. Hoar argued that the United States should not annex territories because it was hard to maintain control of land outside US borders.
Explanation:
Have a good day and stay safe!
“What conflicting views did Lincoln have regarding the abolition of slavery?”
Lincoln have conflicting views regarding the abolition of slavery Abraham Lincoln, the 16th President of the United States, is often remembered for his role in the abolition of slavery.
On one hand, Lincoln believed in the inherent equality of all people, as demonstrated in his famous quote from the Gettysburg Address, where he stated the nation was "dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal." This view was also evident in his opposition to the expansion of slavery into new territories, which he made clear during his debates with Stephen Douglas.
However, Lincoln also had a more pragmatic side, recognizing that immediate and complete abolition of slavery could have negative consequences for the nation. As a politician, he understood that the preservation of the Union was a priority and that pushing too hard for the immediate end of slavery could lead to further divisions and possibly the collapse of the United States.
In conclusion, while Lincoln's personal beliefs leaned towards the idea of equal rights and an eventual end to slavery, he had to balance these views with the practical concerns of preserving the Union and preventing the nation's dissolution. His pragmatic approach led to the eventual abolition of slavery through the 13th Amendment, although his conflicting views were evident throughout his presidency.
Know more about Abolition of slavery here:
https://brainly.com/question/15662286
#SPJ11
Which best describes the differences in Sudan that led to the creation of South Sudan in 2011
In 2011, when South Sudan became independent, the nation was in an upbeat mood. The high hopes its residents once had, however, have now been replaced by violence and severe starvation. Correct option is D.
Fighting, coupled with a crumbling economy, has wreaked havoc on the nation for more than four years, leaving 6.3 million people unable to get enough food. The number of individuals experiencing instability has increased by 1.3 million since famine was declared at this time last year. By the middle of 2017, humanitarian aid had helped put an end to the famine thanks to quick action, but the country's position is still rapidly getting worse.
According to senior humanitarian policy advisor Noah Gottschalk, "Oxfam has never seen such dire need in over 30 years working in the affected areas."
Complete question is:
Which best describes the differences in Sudan that led to the creation of South Sudan in 2011?
A) South Sudan wanted a stricter Islamic government.
B) South Sudan wanted a government that was more socialistic.
C) Religious and ethnic differences led to years of civil war, which resulted in South Sudan's independence.
D) Disputes over election results resulted in political chaos, which resulted in South Sudan declaring their independence.
To know more about South Sudan, click:
https://brainly.com/question/15343160
#SPJ1
Which type of minor party has been the longest lived?
Answer:
Single issued parties is the oldest
hope this helps:)
Explanation:
Explain the causes and implication of the Great Depression.
Answer: slowing consumer demand, mounting consumer debt, decreased industrial production and the rapid and reckless expansion of the U.S. stock market.
Explanation:
Complete the following sentences based on your knowledge of the samurai.
The samurai were a class of Japanese warriors who followed a strict code of conduct known as the Bushido. They were highly skilled in sword fighting and archery, and were trained in the martial arts from a young age.
The samurai were loyal to their lord and they would go to great lengths to protect their honor. They often wore distinctive armor and carried weapons such as a katana sword or a yumi bow.
The samurai played a significant role in Japanese history and the culture, but their power and declined during the Meiji Restoration in the late 19th century.
For more questions on: samurai
https://brainly.com/question/361705
#SPJ11
During the 1920s in Japan, who assumed control of their
government to deal with the Great Depression?
In 1906, Zionists settled on _____ as the area in which they would establish their own nation, although South America and Africa had also been considered
How was the
Sacco & Vanzetti
case an example
of the anti-
immigrant feelings
of the 1920s?
Answer:
Sacco and Vanzetti Case. The Sacco and Vanzetti case is widely regarded as a miscarriage of justice in American legal history. Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti, Italian immigrants and anarchists, were executed for murder by the state of Massachusetts in 1927 on the basis of doubtful ballistics evidence .
Explanation:
Answer:
A paymaster and a security guard are killed during a mid-afternoon armed robbery of a shoe company in South Braintree, Massachusetts. Out of this rather unremarkable crime grew one of the most famous trials in American history and a landmark case in forensic crime detection.
Both Fred Parmenter and Alessandro Berardelli were shot several times as they attempted to move the payroll boxes of their New England shoe company. The two armed thieves, identified by witnesses as “Italian-looking,” fled in a Buick. The car was found abandoned in the woods several days later. Through evidence found in the car, police suspected that a man named Mike Boda was involved. However, Boda was one step ahead of the authorities, and he fled to Italy.
Police did manage to catch Boda’s colleagues, Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti, who were each carrying loaded weapons at the time of their arrest. Sacco had a .32 caliber handgun—the same type as was used to kill the security guards—and bullets from the same manufacturer as those recovered from the shooting. Vanzetti was identified as a participant in a previous robbery attempt of a different shoe company.
Sacco and Vanzetti were anarchists, believing that social justice would come only through the destruction of governments. In the early 1920s, mainstream America developed a fear of communism and radical politics that resulted in an anti-communist, anti-immigrant hysteria. Sacco and Vanzetti, recognizing the uphill battle ahead, tried to put this fear to their advantage by drumming up support from the left wing with claims that the prosecution was politically motivated. Millions of dollars were raised for their defense by the radical left around the world. The American embassy in Paris was even bombed in response to the Sacco-Vanzetti case; a second bomb intended for the embassy in Lisbon was intercepted.
The well-funded defense put up a good fight, bringing forth nearly 100 witnesses to testify on the defendants’ behalf. Ultimately, eyewitness identification wasn’t the crucial issue; rather, it was the ballistics tests on the murder weapon. Prosecution experts, with rather primitive instruments, testified that Sacco’s gun was the murder weapon. Defense experts claimed just the opposite. In the end, on July 14, 1921, Sacco and Vanzetti were found guilty; they were sentenced to death.
However, the ballistics issue refused to go away as Sacco and Vanzetti waited on death row. In addition, a jailhouse confession by another criminal fueled the controversy. In 1927, Massachusetts Governor A. T. Fuller ordered another inquiry to advise him on the clemency request of the two anarchists. In the meantime, there had been many scientific advances in the field of forensics. The comparison microscope was now available for new ballistics tests and proved beyond a doubt that Sacco’s gun was indeed the murder weapon.
Sacco and Vanzetti were executed in August 1927, but even the new evidence didn’t completely quell the controversy. In October 1961, and again in March 1983, new investigations were conducted into the matter, but both revealed that Sacco’s revolver was indeed the one that fired the bullet and killed the security guards. On August 23, 1977, Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis issued a proclamation that Sacco and Vanzetti had not received a fair trial.
Pleaseeee Which of the following is an absolute modifier??
A.tired
B.total
C.angry
D.expensive
Answer:
I Believe it would be D. Expensive
Explanation:
I would think that because "expensive" has no room for improvement in its meaning.
Hope my answer has helped you.
If its wrong and didnt help, im so sorry <3
:)
4. The European powers had more _____________and were able to establish _____________ in Africa.
how did the role of women during world war i affect the suffrage movement?
Answer:
World War I bolstered global suffrage movements Women's massive participation in the war effort led, in part, to a wave of global suffrage in the wake of the war. Women got the right to vote in Canada in 1917, in Britain, Germany, and Poland in 1918, and in Austria and the Netherlands in 1919.
Explanation:
Answer:
Their activities in support of the war helped convince many Americans, including President Woodrow Wilson, that all of the country's female citizens deserved the right to vote. ... 10, 1917, makes a clear connection between American women's wartime service and woman's suffrage.
Explanation:
Which mathematical idea originated in Greece? O the discovery of the absolute value in algebra O the discovery of the zero digit in numbers O the discovery of how to multiply numbers O the discovery of how to calculate distance
Answer: How to calculate distance
Explanation: I took the test and this is right
The mathematical idea that originated in Greece was the discovery of how to calculate distance.
Aristarchus of Samos was the Greek that discovered how to calculate distance. He was an astronomer at this time.
His work showed how to calculate the sizes of the sun and the moon and also how to determine their distances from the earth.
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/17382221?referrer=searchResults