Describe the major influences of women throughout history. Identify two female political leaders, and discuss their achievements and the obstacles they faced. Understand the work of Mother Teresa and the impact that she made on India and the world. Identify obstacles women in leadership have faced throughout history

Rising with the sun would store the citizens of Paris, where he turned into dwelling on the time, an exquisite deal of cash: “a tremendous sum! That the metropolis of Paris may store every year, by way of the economy of the usage of sunshine rather than candles.”

In 1895, New Zealand entomologist and astronomer George Hudson proposed the idea of changing clocks by using two hours every spring to the Wellington Philosophical Society. In 1907, British resident William Willett offered the idea of a manner to store power.

The first point out of saving daylight hours became in “a cost-effective challenge” proposed by way of Benjamin Franklin in 1784. despite the fact that electrical powered houses weren't a factor at some stage in this time, the suggestion was to keep the fee of candlelight.

Learn more about economies here: https://brainly.com/question/1106682

#SPJ1

Here is a summary of the significant foreign policies associated with each of these presidents:

George Washington: He pursued a policy of neutrality and warned against entangling alliances in his farewell address.

James Monroe: The Monroe Doctrine declared that the Western Hemisphere was off-limits to European colonization and intervention.

Theodore Roosevelt: He pursued a policy of aggressive expansionism, intervening in the Caribbean and Central America to protect American interests.

Woodrow Wilson: He advocated for a policy of international cooperation and played a key role in the formation of the League of Nations.

Franklin Roosevelt: He pursued a policy of internationalism, supporting collective security and leading the United States into World War II.

Ronald Reagan: He pursued a policy of anti-communism and military buildup, leading to the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Bill Clinton: He pursued a policy of engagement with China and worked to expand trade, but also led military interventions in Bosnia and Kosovo.

George W. Bush: He pursued a policy of aggressive military intervention, leading to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and also pursued a policy of promoting democracy and human rights in the Middle East.

Freedom of press and the freedom of speech is the constitutional right they are exercising.

These were a group of writers that existed in the progressive era in the United States.

Their goals as writer were to expose some of the ills and issues that were in existence in the American society .

Read more on the Muckrakers here:https://brainly.com/question/10520824

Answer:

C. An internatonal trade organization

Explanation:

Deals with the rules of trade between nations.

The WTO stands for the World Trade Organization, which is an international organization that promotes and regulates international trade. The correct option is C.

The WTO is composed of member countries and operates based on a set of agreements that have been negotiated and signed by its member countries. These agreements cover a range of trade-related issues, including the reduction of trade barriers, the protection of intellectual property, and the settlement of trade disputes.

The WTO's primary goal is to promote free and fair trade among its member countries, and it works to ensure that trade flows as smoothly and predictably as possible. The organization also provides a forum for member countries to negotiate and resolve trade-related issues and disputes on an International level.

Thus, the ideal selection is option C.

Learn more about WTO here:

https://brainly.com/question/30199694

#SPJ7

The primary goal of Sherman's March to the Sea was to destroy anything of use to the Confederacy. Thus, option D is correct.

The Unrecognized Breakaway Herrenvolk Republic of the Confederate States of America (CSA), sometimes known as the Confederate States or the Confederacy, existed in the Southern United States from February 8, 1861, to May 9, 1865.

During the American Civil War, states of the United States that had declared their secession also fought for the Confederacy. They were North Carolina, Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and South Carolina. On February 8, 1861, South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas joined together to form the Confederacy. All seven occurred in the Deep South of the United States, an area whose economy was mostly dependent on agriculture, notably cotton, and a system of plantations that used Americans of African descent as slaves for labor.

Therefore, we can conclude that option D is correct.

Learn more about Confederacy here:

https://brainly.com/question/29766761

#SPJ5

During meals in Lilliput, Gulliver was constantly plagued by the Lilliputians, who were very small in size and would swarm around him, trying to steal his food.

The main character and narrator of Jonathan Swift's book "Gulliver's Travels" is Gulliver. A British sailor, he visits numerous places and comes into contact with a variety of people, from the small Lilliputians to the giants of Brobdingnag. Gulliver offers a sarcastic reflection on human nature and the society in which we live via his travels. Both Gulliver the character and the book "Gulliver's Travels" are regarded as classics of English literature.

The Lilliputians, who were extremely few people, would crowd around Gulliver at meals in Lilliput and try to steal his food. To get the meal to Gulliver's lips, they even used a unique device that resembled a little crane. Despite their best attempts, Gulliver discovered the Lilliputians to be pleasant and wise, and throughout his time in Lilliput, he discovered a lot about their way of life.

To learn more about Gulliver, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/30103544

#SPJ4

Answer:

Trail of Tears

Explanation:

edge 21

The use of a rhetorical question in this passage strengthens Susan B. Anthony's speech by having the audience focus on the central purpose of the speech. The answer is: C. By having the audience focus on the central purpose of the speech.

In conclusion, The use of a rhetorical question in this passage strengthens Susan B. Anthony's speech by having the audience focus on the central purpose of the speech. The answer is: C. By having the audience focus on the central purpose of the speech.

For more questions on Susan B. Anthony's speech:

https://brainly.com/question/21892202

#SPJ8

Answer:

The Enlightenment

Explanation:

The Enlightenment was a major factor in the American and French Revolutions. The Enlightenment was a movement in the 18th century that emphasized the power of reason and individual rights. It was a time of great intellectual and philosophical change, and many Enlightenment thinkers believed in the principles of liberty, democracy, and the natural rights of man. These ideas inspired the revolutionaries in both the American and French Revolutions and helped to shape the modern world. The Spanish Inquisition, the Protestant Reformation, and the War of the Roses were all significant events in their own right, but they had less direct impact on the American and French Revolutions.

Hindu pilgrims bring the ashes of deceased family members to the river as part of a traditional funeral ritual known as asthi-visarjan.

This ritual is believed to help the soul of the deceased to gain moksha, or liberation from the cycle of birth and death. The ashes are released into the water with prayers and mantras, and the act of submerging the ashes is believed to provide the soul an opportunity to take rebirth in the higher realms.

This ritual also symbolizes the merging of the deceased soul with the divine energy of the river and helps bring closure to the family. The act of asthi-visarjan is believed to bring peace and solace to the souls of the deceased.

To know more about Hindu pilgrims, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29483813

#SPJ4

Answer: It had success such as Ethiopia's ability to remain independent and the Chilembwe insurrection; it also had its failures such as lack of technology and lack of unity.

Explanation:

Hope i helped

After the Battleship Maine was sunk in the harbor of Havana on February 15, 1898, the United States declared war on Spain on April 25, 1898.

Humanitarian worries about Cuba were a major contributing factor to the Spanish American War. American business interests in Cuba were another factor that led to the conflict. Americans' desire to see Spain removed from the Western Hemisphere is a third factor. The yellow press was still another factor.

The conflict over Cuba's independence from Spain was the primary cause of the Spanish-American War. Newspapers in the US published sensationalized stories of the atrocities committed by the Spanish in Cuba, which fueled humanitarian worries.

To learn more about Spanish American War here:

https://brainly.com/question/2827989

#SPJ4

Answer:

The three Punic Wars

Explanation:

Punic Wars, also called Carthaginian Wars, (264–146 BCE), a series of three wars between the Roman Republic and the Carthaginian (Punic) empire, resulting in the destruction of Carthage, the enslavement of its population, and Roman hegemony over the western Mediterranean.

During the Civil War, Nashville had a population of approximately 16,000 to 18,000 white citizens and approximately 4,000 to 5,000 black citizens.

During the Civil War, Nashville, Tennessee played a significant role as a strategic city in the Western Theater. Initially occupied by Union forces in February 1862, the city became a vital supply and transportation hub for the Union army.

The city also served as a major center for recruiting and training African American soldiers, who would go on to play a crucial role in the war. In December 1864, the Confederate Army attempted to retake Nashville, but were defeated in the Battle of Nashville. After the war, Nashville became a symbol of Reconstruction in the South, as the city experienced significant growth and economic development.

Read more about Nashville

brainly.com/question/29411067

#SPJ1

Answer: A

Brinksmanship

Mountains and Basins between the Rio Grande River and the Pecos River.

Explanation:

The region of Texas between the Rio Grande River and the Pecos River is mountains and basins.

Thus option A. "Mountains and Basins", is the correct answer.  

Learn more about "Texas" here:

brainly.com/question/12153172

Answer:

It's A and B but it was only one then it would be B love your enemies if you have any other questions let me know

Explanation:

The facts and opinions are as follows:

2. Opinion

3. Fact

4. Opinion

5. fact

6. Opinion

7. Fact

8. Opinion

         Facts refer to statements that are equally accepted by all and are supported by real-life evidence. Facts cannot be different for different people. It will have the same meaning and significance for every person.

         Opinions are personal statements that are framed by different people according to their thoughts, likes, and dislikes. Different people can have different opinions about a single statement.

         The sentences marked as facts in the given exercise show actions which are dependent on real-life factors such as nature, soil, climate, and so on. Thus, this knowledge should be the same for everyone.

         The sentences marked as opinions are personal statements. They have hints of the likes and dislikes of different people.

To learn more about facts and opinions,

https://brainly.com/question/27294270

https://brainly.com/question/959794

#SPJ9

Answer:

Four areas of potential conflict:

The reason why we know so little about most Native American tribes can be best described by factors such as: colonization, cultural erasure, lack of written records, and biased historical accounts.

During colonization, many Native American tribes faced significant disruptions to their way of life. European settlers often forced them to assimilate into European customs and religions, resulting in the loss of their traditional cultural practices.

This process of cultural erasure made it difficult to preserve and understand the unique aspects of each tribe.

Furthermore, many Native American tribes did not have a written language or a system for recording their history, so much of their knowledge was passed down orally from generation to generation.

This oral tradition makes it challenging for modern researchers to piece together accurate historical accounts, as some information might have been lost or altered over time.

Additionally, the historical accounts that do exist were often written by European colonizers, who had their own biases and preconceptions about Native Americans. These accounts can be unreliable and may not provide a comprehensive understanding of Native American tribes.

In summary, the limited knowledge we have about most Native American tribes can be attributed to factors such as colonization, cultural erasure, lack of written records, and biased historical accounts. These factors have made it difficult to preserve and study the rich cultural heritage of these diverse tribes.

To know more about colonization, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/8933081#

#SPJ11

Answer:

In the United States during World War II, about 120,000[5] people of Japanese ancestry, most of whom lived on the Pacific Coast, were forcibly relocated and incarcerated in concentration camps in the western interior of the country. Approximately two-thirds of the internees were United States citizens.[6] These actions were issued by president Franklin D. Roosevelt via executive order shortly after Imperial Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor.[7]

Explanation:

Answer:

ummmm i know , video games

The Byzantine Empire reached its peak under the emperor Justinian, who ruled from 527 to 565 A.D. Justinian .

From late antiquity to the Fall of Constantinople in 1453 AD, the Eastern Roman Empire is covered by this history of the Byzantine Empire. The transitional period when the eastern and western halves of the Roman Empire split is marked by a number of events from the fourth to the sixth centuries. Emperor Diocletian (reigned 284–305) divided the Roman Empire's governance into two halves in 285. [1] Constantine I (r. 306-337) moved the major capital from Rome to Byzantium, which became known as Constantinople ("City of Constantine") and Nova Roma, between 324 and 330. ("New Rome"). [n 1] Theodosius I (reigned 379–395) declared Christianity the official state religion of the Empire, outlawing other faiths including Roman polytheism. Finally, during Heraclius' (r. 610–641) administration, the Empire's military.

Learn more about Justinian here:

https://brainly.com/question/6755905

#SPJ4

Answer:

Black Lives Matter (BLM) is a decentralized political and social movement protesting against incidents of police brutality and all racially motivated violence against black people.

hope I helped

Explanation:

False. Rutherford B. Hayes was an American lawyer and politician who served as the 19th president of the United States from 1877 to 1881. He is best known for his efforts to reconcile the divisions that had arisen between the North and South during the Civil War and Reconstruction eras.

After assuming the presidency in April 1877, Rutherford B. Hayes did not send more federal troops to the South. Rather, he withdrew federal troops from the South as part of his efforts to end Reconstruction. The withdrawal of troops resulted in the end of the era of Reconstruction in the South and the beginning of what is known as the "Jim Crow" era. Therefore, the statement "after assuming the presidency in April 1877, Rutherford B. Hayes sent more federal troops to the south" is False.

Rutherford B. Hayes did not send more federal troops to the South. Rather, he withdrew federal troops from the South as part of his efforts to end Reconstruction. The withdrawal of troops resulted in the end of the era of Reconstruction in the South and the beginning of what is known as the "Jim Crow" era.

To know more about Rutherford B. Hayes visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/28243297

#SPJ11

Question: Write a short essay on the bitter rivalry between USA and USSR

Answer:

The bitter rivalry between the United States of America (USA) and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) during the Cold War era is a defining chapter in modern history. Lasting from the end of World War II until the early 1990s, this intense and ideological struggle shaped global politics and had far-reaching consequences.

The roots of the rivalry can be traced back to the ideological differences between the two superpowers. The USA, representing liberal democracy and capitalism, stood as the champion of individual freedoms and free-market economics. On the other hand, the USSR, espousing communism, sought to establish a classless society and centralized control over the means of production. These conflicting ideologies formed the foundation for a clash of worldviews and power struggles.

The competition between the USA and USSR extended beyond ideological differences and manifested itself in various ways. The arms race was a prominent feature, as both nations sought to develop and maintain an arsenal of nuclear weapons. This race for military dominance escalated tensions and raised the specter of global destruction. Additionally, the USA and USSR engaged in a battle for influence, supporting opposing sides in conflicts around the world. Proxy wars, such as the Korean War and the Vietnam War, served as battlegrounds where the two superpowers indirectly confronted each other.

The bitter rivalry between the USA and USSR had significant global implications. It led to the division of the world into two spheres of influence, with the USA leading the Western bloc and the USSR leading the Eastern bloc. The division was marked by the establishment of military alliances, such as NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) by the USA and the Warsaw Pact by the USSR. This geopolitical divide created a state of constant tension and mistrust between the two superpowers.

However, it is important to note that amidst the rivalry, there were occasional moments of cooperation and détente. Both sides recognized the dangers of a direct military confrontation and engaged in negotiations to mitigate the risks. The signing of arms control agreements, such as the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) and the later START treaties, aimed to reduce the nuclear arsenals of both nations and ease tensions.

The bitter rivalry between the USA and USSR finally reached a turning point in the late 1980s and early 1990s. The USSR faced internal economic and political challenges that ultimately led to its dissolution. The Cold War came to an end, symbolized by the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the subsequent reunification of Germany. The rivalry that had defined global politics for decades was replaced by a new era of cooperation and geopolitical realignments.

In conclusion, the bitter rivalry between the USA and USSR during the Cold War was a defining period in history. Driven by ideological differences, it shaped global politics and had profound implications for the world. The competition between the two superpowers resulted in an arms race, proxy wars, and a division of influence. However, the eventual end of the Cold War demonstrated that even bitter rivals can find avenues for cooperation and peaceful resolutions. The legacy of this rivalry continues to influence international relations and serves as a reminder of the dangers and complexities of global power struggles.

Answer:

Explanation:

Professor Cobb's point can be valid if we consider the possibility that even if the document in question is not genuine, it may still reflect certain aspects of today's society concerning black and brown people. While historical authenticity is crucial, it is essential to acknowledge that the document's content might resonate with current social issues faced by marginalized communities. It could highlight enduring systemic biases, racial discrimination, or unequal treatment that persist in various forms. Professor Cobb's argument invites us to critically examine the document's themes and consider their relevance within our contemporary context.

When contemplating why someone would fabricate such a document, several potential purposes come to mind. Firstly, it might serve as a thought-provoking tool, aiming to shed light on historical injustices and their echoes in modern society. By presenting a fictional account rooted in real historical experiences, the intention could be to prompt conversations, foster empathy, and encourage discussions on racial equality. Secondly, the document could be a work of creative expression, seeking to explore the human experience and provoke emotional responses. Lastly, it is possible that someone might create such a document to deceive or manipulate others, exploiting sensitive issues for personal gain or to incite unrest. However, further investigation and analysis would be necessary to determine the true motives behind its creation.

In conclusion, while the authenticity of the document remains uncertain, Professor Cobb raises a valid point by urging us to examine its content in relation to present-day experiences of black and brown communities. Regardless of its origins, the document could provide insights into persistent societal issues, serving as a catalyst for discussions and reflections on racial inequalities. Understanding the purpose behind its creation requires careful examination and consideration of the broader context, encompassing educational, artistic, or potentially manipulative intentions.

Based on the given options, the most reasonable conclusion that can be drawn about this source on the policy of collectivization is: This source is written from the Soviet perspective.

The reason for this conclusion is that the other options are either contradictory or do not provide sufficient information. The option stating that the source is purely factual and contains no bias cannot be determined solely based on the given information. Bias in sources can manifest in various ways, such as the selection of information, the tone used, or the omission of certain perspectives. Without more details about the source and its content, it is difficult to determine if it is purely factual or unbiased.

The option stating that the source is considered a secondary source is also unsupported by the given information. The distinction between primary and secondary sources depends on the nature and purpose of the source, which cannot be determined without additional context.

The option stating that the source contains no factual information is not justified by the given information either. It is possible for a source to present factual information, even if it may be influenced by bias or subjective interpretation.

Therefore, the most reasonable conclusion is that the source is written from the Soviet perspective, implying that it likely reflects the viewpoints and ideology of the Soviet government or individuals affiliated with it.

for more questions on collectivization

https://brainly.com/question/30167459

#SPJ8

The Secretary of Commerce has the following strengths and weaknesses:

Strengths: Economic policy influence, trade relations, business growth promotion.

Weaknesses: Can be influenced by political agendas, limited power to directly control economic outcomes.

The Secretary of Commerce, as a key member of the executive branch, possesses several strengths and weaknesses.

Strengths:

1. Economic Expertise:

2. Policy Influence:

3. International Engagement:

4. Business Advocacy:

Weaknesses:

1. Political Influence:

2. Limited Direct Control:

3. Bureaucratic Constraints:

4. Stakeholder Interests:

It is important to note that the strengths and weaknesses of the Secretary of Commerce can vary based on the individual holding the position and the specific circumstances of their tenure.

For more such questions on Secretary of Commerce:

https://brainly.com/question/9081769

#SPJ8

Answer:

a. freedom ride

Explanation: