Answer:
in explanation
Explanation:
public law is A general classification of law concerned with the political and sovereign capacity of a state.
Public law is that area of constitutional, administrative, criminal, and International Law that focuses on the organization of the government, the relations between the state and its citizens, the responsibilities of government officials, and the relations between sister states. It is concerned with political matters, including the powers, rights, capacities, and duties of various levels of government and government officials.
Public law refers to an act that applies to the public at large, as opposed to a private law that concerns private individual rights, duties, and liabilities.
and
private law = That portion of the law that defines, regulates, enforces, and administers relationships among individuals, associations, and corporations. As used in distinction to public law, the term means that part of the law that is administered between citizen and citizen, or that is concerned with the definition, regulation, and enforcement of rights in cases where both the person in whom the right inheres and the person upon whom the obligation rests are private individuals.
Fill in the blank with a vocabulary word.
The _______ of flowers smelled good.
bouquet
feathers
flowers
Answer:
The bouquet of flowers smelled good.
Explanation:
A bouquet is a word used to describe a bunch or group of flowers.
Answer:
bouquet
Explanation:
Which makes most sense...
The FEATHERS of flowers smelled good
The FLOWERS of flowers smelled good
The BOUQUET of flowers smelled good
The only one out of those 3 that makes sense, is BOUQUET
:)
Why has the Texas Ethics Commission (TEC) faced severe criticism over its enforcement of campaign laws?
The Texas Ethics Commission (TEC) has faced severe criticism over its enforcement of campaign laws due to several reasons.
One of the primary concerns raised by critics is the perceived lack of effectiveness and efficiency in the TEC's enforcement actions. Critics argue that the TEC has failed to adequately investigate and penalize violations of campaign laws, leading to a sense of impunity among those who may be engaging in questionable campaign practices. The commission has been criticized for being slow in processing complaints and for its limited resources, which may hinder its ability to thoroughly investigate and take appropriate actions.
Another point of criticism is the perception of political influence or bias within the TEC. Some argue that the commission is susceptible to political pressures or that its members may have affiliations or loyalties that compromise their objectivity. This raises concerns about the impartiality and fairness of the enforcement process, undermining public trust in the TEC's ability to regulate campaign finance and ethics.
Furthermore, there have been criticisms regarding the transparency and accountability of the TEC's actions. Critics claim that the commission's decision-making processes lack transparency, making it difficult for the public to understand the rationale behind its enforcement actions. Additionally, concerns have been raised about the perceived leniency of penalties imposed by the TEC, with critics arguing that they may not serve as sufficient deterrents for potential violators.
The complexity and ambiguity of campaign finance laws in Texas have also contributed to the criticism faced by the TEC. Some argue that the laws themselves are convoluted and open to interpretation, creating challenges for consistent enforcement. The lack of clear guidance and the complexity of reporting requirements can create confusion among candidates, political committees, and donors, leading to unintentional violations that are then subject to TEC scrutiny.
Overall, the severe criticism faced by the Texas Ethics Commission over its enforcement of campaign laws stems from concerns regarding its effectiveness, perceived political influence or bias, transparency, and the complexity of campaign finance laws. Addressing these concerns and ensuring a more robust and fair enforcement process will be essential for rebuilding public trust in the TEC's ability to uphold ethical standards and enforce campaign finance regulations effectively.
Learn more about Texas Ethics Commission here
https://brainly.com/question/14318950
#SPJ11
Liability as an accomplice does not extend to negligent and reckless conduct on the part of a
primary actor that results in a criminal offense.
False
True
ransomware
The scam known as ___ threatens to delete or publicly expose a victim's stolen data unless money is paid to the thief.
Answer:
ransomware is the answer, yes
Explanation:
according to a constitutional court, what is the source of African values?
Answer:
Constitution; indigenous values; courts; African jurisprudence. Vl ... In order to put ubuntu in its proper perspective, I will briefly discuss its sources, what it is and ... In traditional communities justice is, according to Krige, realised.
Explanation:
Hope this helps
_____ are intended to punish flagrant wrongdoers and to deter them, as well as others, from engaging in similar conduct in the future.
Punitive Damages are intended to punish flagrant wrongdoers and to deter them, as well as others, from engaging in similar conduct in the future.
In addition to compensatory damages, a defendant who is found guilty of a crime or violation is also required to pay punitive damages.
When compensatory damages, or the money paid to the aggrieved person, are found to be insufficient, punitive damages are granted.
Punitive damages are typically only awarded in the most extreme cases, typically where there is substantial proof of oppression, fraud, gross carelessness, or malice.
These damages go beyond simply compensating the wronged party. as they are intended specifically to penalize defendants whose actions are deemed to be willful or extremely negligent.
Since they are meant to serve as a warning to prevent repeat offences, punitive damages are also known as exemplary damages.
To know more about Punitive Damages, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14265086
#SPJ4
Read the following paragraph from this lesson, and respond by writing a response of 200-words that addresses how studying crimes that have already occurred can assist agents in solving crimes that have yet to be committed.
The FBI recognizes that in order to prevent crimes from occurring, one has to first understand how the criminal thinks. Behavioral science is the scientific study of ways to better understand human behavior. This is the motivation for the Behavioral Science Unit, located at the FBI Training Academy in Quantico, Virginia. It was first established in 1972 and focused on understanding criminal behavior. Scientists, researchers, and agents from this unit work to answer the following questions: who the criminals are, how they think, and why they do what they do. The investigators at the Behavioral Science Unit conduct research both independently and in conjunction with other federal agencies and private organizations. They are developing new approaches and techniques to help law enforcement agents solve crimes that have already happened and prevent new crimes from occurring.
Studying crimes that have already occurred can assist agents in solving crimes that have yet to be committed because it helps law enforcement officers understand better how criminals carry out their operations.
Studying the crimes of the past allows investigators have knowledge on who the criminals are, how they think, and why they do what they do.Investigators think like criminals in order to be able to apprehend them. This makes their investigation a lot more easier.Therefore, studying crimes of the past helps investigations to be successful.
Learn more about essay:
https://brainly.com/question/4008478
Question #4
Multiple Choice
plaintiff, he or she must be in the "zone of danger" where injury
To determine if someone is
could occur.
a worried
an injured
a foreseeable
an irresponsible
Explanation: An injured
I don't know if this is right, but I tried.
Crime prevention:
Briefly describe the textbook’s conclusions regarding the question, “How can we reduce crime?”
What strategy is the most effective in your opinion and why, give examples? Which strategy is
the least effective and why, give examples?
Answer:
Explanation:
This information is based on available research and expert opinions.
Textbook Conclusions:
The conclusions on crime reduction in textbooks can vary depending on the focus and approach of the book. However, many textbooks on criminology and criminal justice agree that reducing crime is a complex issue that requires a multi-faceted approach.
Some common strategies that are often discussed in textbooks include:
Increasing the likelihood of arrest and punishment: This can be achieved through increased police presence, greater use of technology, and more effective enforcement.Addressing the underlying causes of crime: This can involve programs aimed at reducing poverty, improving education, and addressing mental health and substance abuse issues.Fostering community involvement: This can involve initiatives aimed at increasing community cohesion, empowering local residents, and promoting community-police partnerships.Most Effective Strategy:
The effectiveness of a particular strategy for reducing crime will depend on a variety of factors, including the specific crime problem, the context of the community, and the resources available. Some experts argue that a combination of strategies, including both law enforcement and community-based approaches, is likely to be the most effective.
For example, some studies have shown that community-oriented policing, which emphasizes collaboration between police and local residents, can be effective in reducing crime and improving trust in the police. Similarly, programs that address the root causes of crime, such as poverty and lack of access to education and job opportunities, have also been shown to be effective in reducing crime in the long-term.
Least Effective Strategy:
Again, the effectiveness of a particular strategy will depend on the specific context and the crime problem being addressed. However, some experts argue that purely punitive approaches, such as simply increasing the number of people in prison, have limited effectiveness in reducing crime in the long-term. Additionally, approaches that focus solely on law enforcement and ignore underlying social and economic factors are also likely to be less effective.
For example, studies have shown that high incarceration rates do not necessarily lead to a decrease in crime, and can even lead to a greater likelihood of reoffending. Additionally, approaches that focus solely on increasing policing and enforcement can also lead to mistrust and resentment between the police and the community, which can undermine efforts to reduce crime in the long-term.
_____________________________________________________
I hope this information is helpful. I mostly prefer MyAssignmentHelp.com for law assignments. Please let me know if you have any additional questions or refer to MyAssignmentHelp.com for further assistance.
Broker Jane has been accused of violating commission-related laws. Which could cause him to be found guilty?
Answer: Jane paid a commission to a Florida licensee who is not licensed in Georgia, for licensing activity in Georgia.
Explanation:
When was the Supremacy Clause used?
The Supremacy Clause was used by the U.S. Supreme Court for the first time in the 1796 case, Ware v. Hylton.
The United States Constitution's Supremacy Clause declares that the federal laws adopted in accordance with the Constitution, and treaties signed in accordance with its authority are the "supreme Law of the Land" and supersede any conflicting state laws. According to its provisions, state constitutions are subservient to the supreme law and state courts are obligated by it. However, federal acts and treaties must be within the bounds of the Constitution; that is, they must be in accordance with the enumerated powers of the federal government and must not violate other constitutional restraints on federal power, such as the Bill of Rights. Of particular significance is the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which stipulates that the federal government has only those powers granted to it by the Constitution.
Learn more about Supremacy Clause here:
https://brainly.com/question/13839329
#SPJ4
Given the announcement for creating a public defender office at the 1893 World’s Fair and the case of Gideon v. Wainwright, why do you think it took so long for the Sixth Amendment right to become standard practice in America?
The long history of dispute in America between federal power and state power caused such delay.
Most people are not aware of all the amendments and what they guarantee.
Florida is an important state for being a model for abiding by the law.
It took a lawyer who could point out the flaws in an eyewitness to convince the nation of individuals’ rights.
It can be inferred that it took so long for the Sixth Amendment right to become standard practice in America because: "
Most people are not aware of all the amendments and what they guarantee." (Option B)
What is the Sixth Amendment right?In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have the right to a speedy and public trial before a completely unbiased jury of the State and district wherein the crime was committed, which district shall have been previously determined by law, and to be notified of the character and cause of the accusation;
to be challenged with the witnesses against him; to have a mandatory procedure for gathering evidence in his favor; and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
In governance and law, an amendment is an addition or change made to a constitution, legislation, or legislative bill or resolution.
Modifications can be made to existing constitutions and statutes, as well as to legislation during their transit through a legislature.
Learn more about the Sixth Amendment:
https://brainly.com/question/905718
#SPJ1
Which passage from the Article best supports the notion that the Federalists primarily agreed to the Bill of Rights because they supported the Constitution?
A.Most states also had a bill of rights and those that didn't at least list individual rights directly in their constitutions. The U.S. Constitution didn't even do that. What it did do was say that the Constitution was the "supreme law of the land" and was superior to state laws and constitutions.
B.Some of these were in the Magna Carta, and others were in the English Bill of Rights, which had been written fewer than 100 years before America's revolution. The rights in these documents were citizens' only protection from a government that could be both abusive and unpredictable and over which citizens had almost no control.
C.The Bill of Rights was a gesture of goodwill that was meant to bring everyone together around the new Constitution. Above all, the goal was to see the United States become a nation of unified people.
D.So not only did the Constitution fail to protect individual rights, but it also overruled the protections in state constitutions. It seemed that a bill of rights would be needed to ensure that the federal government could not overstep its bounds.
The Article best supports the notion that the Federalists primarily agreed to the Bill of Rights because they supported the Constitution is that, most states also had a bill of rights and those that didn't at least list individual rights directly in their constitutions.
The supporters of the Constitution, who were the Federalists, thought that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary and even dangerous. So, the authors of The Federalist Papers, including James Madison, argued for the ratification of the Constitution without Bill of Rights.
Federalists argued that the Constitution was not in need of a Bill of Rights, as the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government.
Hence, option A is correct.
To learn more about the Bill of Rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/10618576
#SPJ1
what major threat has changed the purpose of criminal justice organizations and how they function?
Terrorism is the major threat that has changed the purpose of criminal justice organizations.
A peaceful, accountable, and legitimate response to terrorism can be provided by counter-terrorism initiatives that are based on an effective and open criminal justice system that upholds human rights and the rule of law. This kind of response by the criminal justice system to terrorism can help prevent or reduce the risk of using force in an unreasonable and/or illegal way outside of the safeguards and procedural guarantees provided by the due process of law. Even under terrorist threats, it can bolster a society's commitment to human rights and the rule of law.
The criminal justice system has a challenging role to play in the fight against terrorism. Indeed, the prevention of terrorist attacks must be the primary goal of counterterrorism strategies, and in some instances, law enforcement agencies are able to prevent terrorist attacks. However, when it comes to preventing terrorist conspiracies from achieving their goal or when a terrorist threat is too extensive for resources to handle, some of the current criminal justice practices are less effective . To implement all of the recommended measures for the law enforcement and criminal justice systems with the necessary levels of technical capacity, however, there may be significant accompanying challenges, particularly for States with lower levels of financial resources.
To know more about Terrorism and Criminal Justice visit
brainly.com/question/5171715
#SPJ4
This is an LSAT practice questions.
I need help answering the questions. Please do a step-by-step- explanation. I prefer that you draw out the game to help me understand the question.
Jason enters six races: biking, canoeing, horseback riding, ice skating, running, and swimming. He places between first and fifth in each. Two places are consecutive only if the place numbers are consecutive. Jason's places in canoeing and running are consecutive. His places in ice skating and swimming are consecutive. He places higher in biking than in horseback riding. He places higher in canoeing than in running.
1. If Jason places higher in running than in biking and places higher in biking than in ice skating and swimming, which one of the following allows all six of his race rankings to be determined?
A. He places fourth in horseback riding.
B. He places fourth in ice skating.
C. He places the same in both horseback riding and ice skating.
D. He places the same in both horseback riding and swimming.
E. He places higher in horseback riding than in swimming.
2. If Jason places higher in running than in biking and places higher in horseback riding than in ice skating, exactly how many of his rankings can be determined?
A. 2
B. 3
C. 4
D. 5
E. 6
3. Assume that Jason's rank in running is higher than his rank in ice skating and consecutive with it, and that his rankings in swimming and running differ. Which one of the following must be true?
A. Jason places both first and second.
B. Jason places both first and third.
C. Jason places both second and fourth.
D. Jason places both second and fifth.
E. Jason places both fourth and fifth.
The following allows all six of his race rankings to be determined: He places fourth in horseback riding. Thus option (A) is correct.
What is horseback riding?Horseback riding, also known as equestrianism, is the skill or sport of riding horses. It involves controlling and guiding a horse and to communicate with the horse and direct its movements.
Horseback riding can be done for various purposes, including transportation, recreation, competitive sports, and therapy. It has a long history and is practiced in many cultures around the world for a variety of purposes, such as transportation, agriculture, warfare, and sport.
He places fourth in horseback riding is consistent with all the given clues and allows us to determine all six of Jason's race rankings. Therefore, option (A) is correct.
Learn more about horseback riding here:
https://brainly.com/question/9637871
#SPJ2
Discuss and summarize the importance of building laws and codes
to the architecture practice.
The importance of building laws and codes to the architecture practice is that it ensures the safety, health, and welfare of the public by providing minimum standards for the design, construction, and maintenance of buildings.
Building codes are a set of regulations that must be followed when constructing buildings to ensure that they meet minimum standards for safety, fire protection, energy efficiency, and other critical areas. Architects are required to stay up-to-date with the latest building codes and regulations to ensure that their designs meet the minimum standards and comply with local laws. Failure to comply with building codes and regulations can result in fines, legal action, or even loss of life. Therefore, building laws and codes are crucial to the architecture practice to ensure the safety and well-being of the public.
To learn more about building code visit: https://brainly.com/question/31032521
#SPJ11
What formal requirements does Article III impose on federal judges?
A natural born citizen
Attaining 35 years old
Must be religious
None
Answer:
a natural born citizen
Explanation:
Which system of government has the advantage of keeping government leaders highly accountable to voters?.
Answer:
The answer is presidential
Explanation: Hope this helps:)
Formal authority is
A. an established organization, especially one providing a public service.
B. the ability to cause others to behave as they might not otherwise choose
to do.
C. the legal right or power to give orders and enforce rules.
the process and method of making decisions for groups.
Answer: C. the legal right or power to give orders and enforce rules.
Explanation:
Formal authority is the power that is given to a leader by an organization.
Communication is not protected if unpatriotic, defiant, or disrespectful.
True or false
1. A ______________________ requires that a judgment rendered by
a state in the US, with proper jurisdiction, must be honored by
other states in the US.
2. What type of jurisdiction involves a courts
A Full Faith and Credit Clause requires that a judgment rendered by a state in the US, with proper jurisdiction, must be honored by other states in the US.
The Full Faith and Credit Clause is a clause in the United States Constitution that requires states to recognize the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of other states within the United States. The clause requires that the ruling of a state court of any other state be given binding authority in the courts of each state as if it had been rendered by a local court.
This is meant to ensure the unity of the nation and to further ensure that public records are accepted as reliable nationwide, such as marriage licenses and land claims. The Full Faith and Credit Clause also prevents one state from refusing to enforce the promises of another state's government. This allows for stronger interstate cooperation as well as providing uniformity within the states.
This clause does not require that states honor the laws or policy of other states, despite what those states may permit. The clause only requires that states recognize legal proceedings, such as court decisions, that took place in another state.
To know more about Credit Clause , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14301729
#SPJ4
Charles states he has authority to contract for Wyatt and that he will be personally liable if he does not in fact have the authority to bind Wyatt. Identify the name and effect of Charles’s statement. If Charles enters the contract without making such a statement, is there a way the same effect could result?
Answer:
Hey dont you know that you can look it up
Explanation:
Which of the following is NOT one of the provided tips for building good relationships with mentors?
a Set aside time to evaluate what you have learned from the relationship
b Develop idealistic expectations for the relationship
c Express your gratitude to have the relationship
d Get to know one another
Answer:
When meeting someone you should not expect something from someone.
litigation is a dispute resolution process where parties and their attorneys argue their positions in a court of law. True/False?
In a court of law, parties and their attorneys present their arguments as part of the litigation process for resolving disputes.
In terms of law, what does litigation mean?The process of settling conflicts through the public court system by submitting or responding to a complaint is referred to as litigation.
What is the process of settling a case in court called?Although the outcome of negotiations is typically not final, parties can file a lawsuit to settle their differences and get an enforceable judgment. A professional mediator, who is an impartial third party, assists disputing parties in the mediation process.
What constitutes a dispute's legal resolution?The word "dispute resolution" covers a variety of procedures that can be used to settle a disagreement, dispute, or claim. These procedures serve as substitutes for having a court (a state or federal judge or jury) or another institution decide how to resolve a case or contract.
To Know more about litigation process
https://brainly.com/question/28044450
#SPJ1
evaluate to what the religious organizations have or currently supporting communities affected by human trafficking
Trafficking Prevention and Intervention Organizations
1. CAST-Coalition to Abolish Slavery & Trafficking
2. Center for Human Trafficking Awareness
3. Justice Planning Management Associates
If this helped, please give it brainliest!
Do you think that the dairy industry is an example of a purely competitive market? Why or why not? If not, what industry is?
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
because it record everything
substantive law: sets the rules by wehich one may enforce his rights under the law. None of these choices. defines, regulates, and creates a legal relationship or prohibits certain conduct. is the same thing as procedural law.
Substantive law is a type of law that defines, regulates, and creates legal relationships, as well as prohibits certain conduct.
It sets the rules by which one may enforce their rights under the law. This is different from procedural law, which focuses on the processes and procedures involved in the legal system.
Substantive law helps to establish and maintain a just and orderly society by clearly outlining the rights and responsibilities of individuals and organizations.
In summary, substantive law is essential for defining and regulating legal relationships and conduct, while procedural law ensures that the legal system operates effectively and fairly.
To know more about Substantive law refer here: https://brainly.com/question/30673552#
#SPJ11
What agency(ies) and regulation(s) govern advertising of consumer products such as bottled water? What is the purpose of consumer protection as it relates to truthful advertising? What are the consequences for non-compliance with federal and/or state regulations (students should use their own state of residence regulations) around consumer products and services? What recommendations would you offer that comply with regulations and could still promote the product for the company?
The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
The government agency that regulates advertising of consumer products such as bottled water is the FDA, The Food and Drug Administration.
What is the purpose of consumer protection as it relates to truthful advertising?
The purpose is that companies really and truthfully inform American consumers over the components of the food or medicines they are about to take. It is of the utmost importance that the American people are informed and protected when they are consuming food or medicines, so they know what they are having.
What are the consequences for non-compliance with federal and/or state regulations around consumer products and services?
FDA has the power to enforce its regulations nationwide. If companies do not comply, the FDA can enforce the regulations and companies have to pay fines from 100,000 to more than 250,000 dollars.
What recommendations would you offer that complies with regulations and could still promote the product for the company?
My recommendation is that companies are honest when making advertisements to promote their products. Many times, companies lie to attract more consumers to defeat their competitors, cheating the people on some benefits that are not true.
That is not honest or ethical.
Clear communication and honesty is my best advice.
Children of immigrants reported significantly higher rates/percentages of violence against _________ (according to studies).a. fathersb. mothersc. siblingsd. grandparentsAnswer: b
According to studies, Children of immigrants reported significantly higher rates/percentages of violence against their mothers.
How has crime rate among immigrants changed?First-generation immigrants, or people who were born outside of the United States, had much lower crime rates than both the general population and the second generation. For individuals who are in their teens or early 20s, when criminal activity is at its highest, it is even lower.
However, a generation later, crime rates increased. In reality, it is essentially the same as the rate amongst native-born Americans during the years with the highest crime rates. In the past year, roughly one-quarter of 16-year-old native-born and 2nd generation immigrant youths have committed crimes, according to the accompanying chart from a previous Bersani research. In comparison, roughly 17% of 16-year-olds who are foreign-born have breached the law.
To know more about Crime rate, check out:
brainly.com/question/13772436
#SPJ4
Which of the following statements is true of the Walnut Street Jail?
a. Solitary confinement was rarely practiced in the Walnut Street Jail
b. It created a regimen of hard work and reflection for its inmate
c. Four to five inmates were housed in each cell.
d. It generally used corporal punishment to punish its inmate
Walnut Street Prison has created a system of hard work and reflection for its inmates.
Option b is correct .
Walnut His Street Jail in Philadelphia was built in the late 18th century and is considered one of the first modern prisons in the United States. It was intended to practice a new prison philosophy centered on rehabilitation and repentance.
Run by Quakers who believed in the possibility of moral reform, Walnut Street Prison aims to provide a structured environment for inmates to reflect on their crimes and engage in productive work. I was there. This concept was known as the "Pennsylvania system" or "segregation system", and inmates were expected to be isolated from each other, repent and do manual labor.
Hence, Option b is correct .
To know more about Walnut Street Jail visit :
https://brainly.com/question/14992415
#SPJ4