David's silence as to the soil condition renders the contract voidable at ruth's discretion. The correct answer is option c.
David's silence regarding the subsurface soil condition, despite being aware of it and knowing that it would prevent the construction of a high-rise commercial building, can be seen as a form of fraudulent misrepresentation.
By failing to disclose the condition to Ruth, David withheld important information that could have influenced Ruth's decision to enter into the contract.
In this scenario, Ruth was not aware of the soil condition and did not make any inquiries about it. Therefore, David had a duty to disclose the information since it was not readily discoverable through normal inspections or evaluations.
Ruth has the right to consider the contract voidable, meaning she can choose to proceed with the contract or rescind it due to the fraudulent misrepresentation by David.
The correct answer is option c.
To know more about contract refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ11
What factors have contributed to the growth of presidential powers?
National emergencies, the economic and social life of the country, and the unity of his presidency has led to the growth of presidential power.
National emergencies, the economic and social life of the country, and the unity of his presidency has led to the growth of presidential power.
Several factors have contributed to the growth of presidential powers in the United States over time. One of the most significant factors is the expansion of the federal government's responsibilities and the need for the president to take on a greater role in managing national affairs. The rise of a more complex global environment, with challenges such as terrorism and economic competition, has also led to an increased focus on the executive branch and the president's ability to respond quickly and effectively to these challenges.
Another factor is the use of executive orders and other unilateral actions by presidents to achieve their policy objectives when faced with a divided government or a hostile Congress. The growth of presidential power has also been aided by the emergence of new technologies and media, which have given presidents greater visibility and reach, as well as the increasing importance of the presidency in American political culture. Finally, some scholars argue that the growth of presidential power is the result of a deliberate effort by presidents themselves to expand their authority, often with the support of their political allies and the public.
To learn more about presidential powers visit;
https://brainly.com/question/3962141
#SPJ4
Why would intellectual property theft fit the mission of private technology security and possibly be more applicable than it is to law enforcement?
Law enforcement does not tend to get involved in white collar crime.
Answer:
Because intellectual property theft is a non-violent crime, usually corporate and for financial reasons.
Explanation:
Law enforcement is aimed at solving violent crimes, of large proportions that promote physical damage and well expressed. Theft of intellectual property does not fit this type of crime, since it is a non-violent crime, of a corporate nature and that causes financial damage, but does not promote physical and widespread harm. In this case, this type of crime is best addressed by the private security and technology mission.
what you believe the people of Texas should do on gun control and gun violence issue
Answer:
Nah
Explanation:
Answer:
dont ask this
Explanation:
sir this is a Wendy's drive thru
quizlet ben is concerned that if he injures someone or damages someone's property he could be held legally responsible and required to pay damages. this type of risk is called a
The type of risk Ben is concerned about, whereby if he causes injury to a person or damage to their property, and he may be legally responsible for compensation, is referred to as a liability risk.
Liability risks are a type of risk that an individual or company may face as a result of their actions or operations. In essence, this kind of risk arises when there is a possibility of a lawsuit or legal action against the party involved if they cause injury to someone else or harm their property.
In this case, Ben could face significant financial losses and legal repercussions if he injures someone or damages their property, making it crucial for him to have liability insurance coverage that can protect him in the event of such an incident.
Learn more about Liability risks
https://brainly.com/question/29361914
#SPJ11
The type of risk that Ben is concerned about is called liability. It is important for individuals to be aware of the potential risks and take appropriate precautions to avoid causing harm or damage to others.
Liability refers to the legal responsibility one has for their actions or omissions that result in harm to someone else or damage to their property. In this case, Ben is worried that if he injures someone or damages their property, he could be held liable. If a court determines that Ben is responsible for the harm caused, he may be required to pay damages, which are monetary compensation to the injured party. Liability can arise in various situations, such as car accidents, personal injury cases, or property damage claims.
To know more about liability, visit
https://brainly.com/question/28391469
#SPJ11
e Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 is applicable to all sales agreements concluded in South Africa is True or false
True. The Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 applies to all sales agreements concluded in South Africa, including agreements between businesses and consumers, as well as agreements between two businesses.
What is the Consumer Protection Act about?The Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 is a South African law that seeks to protect the rights of consumers by regulating business practices and promoting fair, transparent, and equitable dealings between consumers and suppliers. The Act came into effect on 1 April 2011.
Some of the key provisions of the Consumer Protection Act include:
Consumer rights: The Act guarantees certain rights to consumers, such as the right to fair and honest marketing, the right to receive goods and services that are of good quality, and the right to safe products.Prohibited conduct: The Act prohibits certain business practices, such as false or misleading advertising, fraudulent or unconscionable conduct, and unfair contract terms.Product liability: The Act holds suppliers responsible for any harm caused by defective or unsafe products.Consumer protection agencies: The Act provides for the establishment of various consumer protection agencies, such as the National Consumer Commission, to enforce the provisions of the Act and protect consumers.Dispute resolution: The Act provides for various mechanisms for resolving disputes between consumers and suppliers, such as mediation and arbitration.Learn more about Consumer Protection Act here: https://brainly.com/question/14952903
#SPJ1
Vehicle A was parked alongside the right curb just behind vehicle B. The driver of vehicle A
came out of the dry cleaner’s and hung the dry-cleaned clothes over the left rear window. The
driver entered vehicle A and checked for traffic in the rearview mirror. Seeing none, the driver
began to move the vehicle away from the curb and into the traffic lane. Vehicle C, traveling in
the same direction and coming from behind vehicle A, crashed into the driver’s side of vehicle
A. The impact pushed vehicle A into the left side of vehicle B.
How could the collision have been avoided?
Answer:
By not hanging clothes over the left rear mirror. This maneuver blocked the blind spot of vehicle A. Given that they are parallel parked in an area of commerce, however, one could also argue vehicle C should have been paying more attention as well. Had Vehicle C reacted to the movement of Vehicle A in a swifter manner, there would also have been no collision. This, combined with lower residential speed limits implies C was distracted driving.
Samantha is accused of selling drugs. When she appears before the judge, she asks for a lawyer because she can't afford one herself. The judge denies her access to a lawyer.
According to the given statement The judge denies her access to a lawyer to 6th amendment.
What do lawyers do?A lawyer advises clients on their rights and responsibilities under the law. He or she is qualified to interpret existing laws, apply them to particular circumstances, and create new ones. A lawyer's duties include presenting evidence and making arguments on behalf of one of the sides in a civil or a criminal trial on behalf of his or her client.
Is a lawyer superior to a lawyer?Remember not all solicitors are attorneys; not all attorneys are lawyers. An attorneys is a licensed lawyer in their state who has passed the bar test required for practice. The harsh reality is that working in law is quite taxing. Being a lawyer is a career choice that frequently necessitates putting in extensive study hours.
To know more about Lawyer visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28940974
#SPJ4
what happens with illegally seized evidence in juvenile proceedings?
In juvenile proceedings, illegally seized evidence is handled differently than in adult court. If evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence.
An illegal seizure is a search or seizure by law enforcement without a valid warrant or without reasonable suspicion. An officer is required to have reasonable suspicion, or probable cause, before conducting a search or seizure. A search or seizure may be considered illegal if it violates the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, including the police. It applies to both adults and juveniles.
If the evidence is obtained illegally, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in court proceedings. The rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings. The exclusionary rule is designed to protect the constitutional rights of individuals and ensure that law enforcement officers do not violate their rights.In summary, if evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings.
To know more about proceedings:
https://brainly.com/question/29791715
#SPJ11
examine how religious code apply to various aspect of morality
laws that are meant to promote free trade and market efficiency likely fall under which school of jurisprudential thought?
a. Law and economics
b. Irrational forces
c. Command
d. Natural law
Laws that are meant to promote free trade and market efficiency likely fall under the school of jurisprudential thought known as a. Law and economics.
This school of thought applies economic principles and methods to the analysis of legal rules and institutions. It focuses on how laws can promote economic efficiency and how legal rules can affect market behavior.
Therefore, laws that are meant to promote free trade and market efficiency would fall under this school of thought.
To know more about jurisprudential thought, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14254828#
#SPJ11
Estelle hears a radio ad telling her that she can attend a free seminar to learn how to “flip” houses to make tons of money quickly, all while being her own boss. What is this seminar probably trying to do
If Estelle hears a radio ad telling her that she can attend a free seminar to learn how to “flip” houses to make tons of money quickly, all while being her own boss. This seminar probably trying to do: A. the Bureau of Economics.
What is the Bureau of Economics?The Bureau of Economics can be defined as an agency whose roles is to provide the necessary information or data that will help to promote an economy and this data provided are often useful and accurate.
Based on the scenario the seminar is probably trying to do the Bureau of Economics so as to enables Estelle acquire knowledge that will help to become her own boss.
Therefore the correct option is A.
Learn more about Bureau of Economics here:https://brainly.com/question/1391135
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
Eileen works for the federal government and would like to find a report about the effectiveness of a recent FTC-created consumer education program designed to help families better meet their monthly rent payments. Which branch of the FTC should she contact first about finding such a report?
the Bureau of Economics
the Bureau of Competition
the Bureau of Consumer Protection
the Bureau of Housing and Development
Subraya la opción cuya serie de palabras tiene el mismo significado. A) viejo, remoto, antiguo, arcaico, añejo b) aumentar, incrementar, disminuir, crecer, ampliar c) defender, atacar, proteger, cuidar, resguardar
Answer:
A) viejo, remoto, antiguo, arcaico, añejo
b) aumentar, incrementar, disminuir, crecer, ampliar
c) defender, atacar, proteger, cuidar, resguardar
Explanation:
A) Remoto es la única palabra que no sigue la línea de algo de hace años, antiguo y viejo. Remoto es algo que remite a lejanía pero no en el sentido del resto de las palabras. Entonces, las palabras que siguen el mismo significado son: Viejo, Antiguo, Arcaico, Añejo
B) Disminuir es la única palabra que significa lo opuesto a todo el resto. Aumentar, Incrementar, Crecer y Ampliar significan que algo aumenta o crece en tamaño, mientras disminuir es el antónimo de esas palabras.
C) Atacar es el antónimo de la serie de palabras que implican cuidado y protección, el mantener a alguien o a algo seguro. La serie de palabras iguales son: Defender, Proteger, Cuidar y Resguardar.
Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs.
Match the terms with their description.
-employees of an organization
-disclosing prospective buyer’s personal details to others
-extending clarification where necessary
-buyers of services offered by an organization
good customer service
external customer
internal customers
bad customer service
Answer:
1. Internal customers.
2. Bad customer service.
3. Good customer service.
4. External customers.
Explanation:
1. Internal customers: employees of an organization. The individuals working within an organization are referred to as internal customers.
2. Bad customer service: disclosing prospective buyer’s personal details to others. In some cases, this act is punishable by a court of competent jurisdiction because customer information are considered confidential and must be protected.
3. Good customer service: extending clarification where necessary. It entails a customer relationship manager, salesperson or other employees working in an organization, offering to help customers with their challenges or product choices.
4. External customers: buyers of services offered by an organization. These are the group of people who patronize a business firm or organization for its finished goods and services.
ALI REFERS SAPA TO BLUE TECH.CO CEO FOR A VACANCY OF ADMIN OFFICER. HERE ALI ACT AS A FORM IN IMPLIED
Answer:
Explanation:
What? I would help but i dont understand.
The subjecting of a person to a second trial or punishment for the same offense for which the
person has already been tried or punished.
A. Self-Incrimination
B. Double Jeopardy
C. Malice
D. Acquittal
Answer:
b. double jeopardy
Explanation:
the supreme court decision in what case led many affirmative action opponents to believe that the court may have been on its way to abolishing affirmative action completely?
Answer:
Explanation:
The Supreme Court decision in the case of Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2013) led many affirmative action opponents to believe that the Court may have been on its way to abolishing affirmative action completely.
In this case, a white student named Abigail Fisher challenged the University of Texas at Austin's use of race as a factor in its admissions process. Fisher argued that the university's affirmative action policy violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, as well as federal civil rights laws.
The Supreme Court ultimately ruled in favor of the University of Texas, upholding the constitutionality of its affirmative action policy. However, the decision was a narrow one, with the Court emphasizing that universities must show a compelling interest in using race as a factor in admissions, and that they must use race-neutral alternatives whenever possible.
While the Fisher decision did not abolish affirmative action outright, many opponents of affirmative action saw it as a significant setback for the policy, as it signaled that the Court was becoming increasingly skeptical of the use of race in university admissions. Some opponents of affirmative action saw the Fisher decision as a step towards a future Supreme Court decision that could potentially abolish affirmative action altogether.
That part of traditional Western law that creates and defines fundamental rights and duties and which is the basis of this class is called.....
The part of traditional Western law that creates and defines fundamental rights and duties is called "constitutional law."
Constitutional law refers to the body of law that governs the interpretation and application of a country's constitution. It defines the powers and limitations of the government and protects the rights and freedoms of individuals.
Constitutional law serves as the basis for the legal system of a country and provides a framework for the functioning of the government and society as a whole. It sets out the fundamental principles, structures, and processes of the government and establishes the rights and duties of citizens.
Constitutional law is typically considered to be the highest form of law in a country, as all other laws must be consistent with it. In the United States, for example, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and all other laws must conform to its provisions.
For more questions like Law click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/6107503
#SPJ11
If you had the opportunity to change the Constitution in one way in order to improve it, what would you
propose? In a short paragraph, explain your proposal and discuss why you think the Constitution will be a
stronger, better document with this change.
If I had the opportunity to change the Constitution in one way in order to improve it I will include stiffer penalties for those who are involved in corrupt practices.
What is Constitution?This is referred to as the laws of a nation or country which explains the power and duties of the government and it is important as it ensures everyone behaves well and are accountable for their actions.
The amendment of the constitution which I will consider is stiffer penalties for anyone involved in corrupt practices. this is because of the effect it has on the population. It puts people under unnecessary pressure to live a luxury life regardless of the means. It also deprives the populace of their right of well functioning social amenities.
Stiffer penalties will make people have a rethink before going into such practice which was why it was chosen.
Read more about Corruption here https://brainly.com/question/472198
#SPJ1
What are the challenges for forensic scientists in identifying poisons?
Answer:
Taking samples to see what poisons were used and handling the samples
1. Review at least one major law enacted by the federal
government in relation to health. Asses what promoted this
legislation. How might it impact the health of older adults?
Answer:
One major law enacted by the federal government in relation to health is the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare. The ACA was passed in 2010 with the aim of improving access to healthcare, reducing healthcare costs, and enhancing the quality of care for all Americans.
Several factors promoted the legislation of the ACA. One key factor was the high number of uninsured individuals in the United States, which left many people without access to necessary medical services. The rising costs of healthcare and the challenges faced by individuals with pre-existing conditions in obtaining affordable coverage were also driving forces behind the ACA.
The ACA has various provisions that directly impact the health of older adults. It provides new protections for older Americans by prohibiting insurance companies from denying coverage or charging higher premiums based on age. The law also expands Medicaid, which benefits low-income older adults who may have previously struggled to afford healthcare.
Furthermore, the ACA introduced measures to enhance preventive care for older adults, such as free screenings and vaccinations. It established the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit, allowing seniors to receive preventive services and personalized prevention plans at no additional cost. The ACA also implemented changes to Medicare's prescription drug coverage, aiming to reduce out-of-pocket costs for prescription medications.
Overall, the ACA has had a significant impact on the health of older adults by expanding access to affordable healthcare, improving preventive services, and addressing some of the financial burdens associated with aging and healthcare costs. However, it remains a complex and debated law, and its implementation and effects continue to be evaluated and discussed.
Explanation:
One major law that has been enacted by the federal government in relation to health is the Affordable Care Act (ACA). What prompted this legislation was the high rates of uninsured Americans and the rising costs of healthcare. Older adults now have greater access to preventive care and chronic disease management services, which can help improve their overall health outcomes.
One major law that has been enacted by the federal government in relation to health is the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which was signed into law in 2010. The ACA was designed to increase the availability and affordability of health insurance coverage for Americans, including older adults.
What prompted this legislation was the high rates of uninsured Americans and the rising costs of healthcare. Before the ACA, many older adults were unable to afford health insurance due to their age and pre-existing conditions, which made it difficult to access necessary medical care.
The ACA addressed this issue by prohibiting insurers from charging older adults more for coverage based on their age, and by expanding access to Medicaid for low-income individuals and families.
As a result, older adults now have greater access to preventive care and chronic disease management services, which can help improve their overall health outcomes.
Additionally, the ACA also established the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, which is responsible for testing new payment and service delivery models that aim to improve the quality of care for older adults while reducing healthcare costs.
Read more about ACA at https://brainly.com/question/29793469
#SPJ11
Why is important to be physically fit as a law enforcement officer ? Provide at least 4 reasons
Answer:are better able to respond when called to do so. can perform more work with less effort. are less likely to suffer injury during physically demanding activities. experience faster recovery following physical exertion.
Explanation:
what is the role of the competition appeal court
Answer: Competition
Explanation: Competition Appeal Tribunal a specialist judicial body. Among other things, it is charged with hearing appeals in respect of decisions made under the Competition Act 1998 by the OFFICE OF FAIR TRADING and the regulators in the telecommunications, electricity, gas, water, railways and air traffic services sectors.
Hope this helps!
Chen was here
Answer: The Competition Appeal Court may consider any appeal from, or review of, a decision of the Competition Tribunal; confirm, amend or set aside a decision or an order that is the subject of appeal or review by the Competition Tribunal; and give any judgment or make any order that the circumstances require.
Explanation:
Se encarga de vigilar y evaluar el ejercicio del gasto público, para lo cual realiza actos de fiscalización, con la finalidad de consolidar un gobierno de transparencia y honestidad
Answer:
Auditor General.
Explanation:
Un auditor es una persona que realiza una auditoría y verifica, mediante cuestionamiento, observación y escucha, cómo se está desarrollando una persona u organización y si se están cumpliendo las especificaciones financieras y legales que le son exigibles. Así, el Auditor General de Gobierno es el funcionario público que controla el estado financiero de las entidades de la administración pública, así como también lleva a cabo la fiscalización y control de cada acto particular que es realizado por el gobierno.
When do you think police officers should issue warning tickets rather than citations for people who are speeding?
What is the rule of law
6. What is the goal of social policy? Name some programs and state how they help communities.
The goal of social policy is in order to identify and find ways of reducing inequalities in access to services and as well as support between social groups.
The main goal of social policies is in order to ensure that everyone in the society lives in peace and harmony and also away from the conflicts. With the social policies, it is aimed to ensure that social development, social integration, social justice, social balance, and social peace to the social groups.
Social policy aims to improve human welfare and also to meet human needs for health, education, housing and also economic security. For instance, in the United States, a few programs are: Medicare- Health insurance for individuals over 65 and those with certain illnesses or disabilities.
Hence, important areas of social policy are welfare, social security, poverty reduction, justice, etc.
To learn more about social policy here:
https://brainly.com/question/25451003
#SPJ1
to those who say flag burning should be illegal despite this evidence, i have a few questions. what exactly would be protected by a law that makes it illegal to burn flags? clothing featuring american flags? fourth of july picnic napkins and plates?
Flag burning in the United States ought to be forbidden and seen as abhorrent.
When Flag Burning Was Illegal?
States didn't start establishing legislation making it unlawful to burn, deface, mutilate, or otherwise disrespect the American flag until the early 20th century. The U.S. Supreme Court began challenging these regulations in 1969, initially by declaring that clauses that forbade verbal disrespect of the flag violated the First Amendment. A few years later, the Court overturned the college student's conviction for hanging an upside-down flag with a peace symbol on it. Then, in 1989, the Supreme Court ruled that burning the flag as part of a political protest qualified as "expressive action" that was protected by the constitution even if no words were used.
To learn more about flag burning visit;
https://brainly.com/question/8992381
#SPJ4
best way to write a letter for Long-Term disability appeal
The best way to write a letter for long-term disability is to emphasize claims of disability and attaching medical records acting as evidence.
What is a long-term disability appeal?Long-term disability insurance is a form of coverage that pays out if an employee is unable to work for an extended length of time due to an accident, illness, or injury. This sort of insurance pays the employee a percentage of their salary while they are out of the office.
While writing a disability claim it is important to mention all the facts related to a medical condition and why the insurance company denied the fact. It should include all the documents proving your claim for the disability.
Learn more about long-term disability appeal, here:
https://brainly.com/question/27571970
#SPJ1
A cryptocurrency trader wants to open a bank account in your bank in Italy. What documents would you require him to do it? Imagine that the trader explains his business in detail, and he says that he buys cryptocurrency online and sells them for more money to make a profit. He has financial statements; ha pays taxes and has all of this in the rule. Do you think his economic activity is risky for AML purposes? Would you open the account to him?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
If a cryptocurrency trader wants to open a bank account in my bank in Italy, I would be very strict in order to proceed with his request. I would double-check the present legislation in Italy regarding Anti-money Laundering and all the laws regarding international finance and banking transactions. And do not want to have any problems with the law.
The documents I would require him to provide are the legal constitution of his company in a real country, not in the so-called "fiscal paradises" such as Andorra. He would have to provide me with all the documents that prove he runs a legal business and I would take these documents to the legal department of the bank to prove and certify them.
I would also ask my assistant to personally check on the web or public criminal records to know if the ma's company has had any problems in the past that had affected his reputation.
I would ask him to explain his business in detail, with the presence of an expert in the cryptocurrency business. I would require a copy of the company's financial statements, his taxes, and proof that he has no debt. He needs to prove that all the documents are in perfect rule.
Yes, I think his economic activity is risky for AML purposes because that is the nature of the cryptocurrency business. It has not been regulated by any government in the world. That is the reason why almost no bank in the world or country accepts cryptocurrency as normal currency. It is so volatile. Indeed, nobody regulates cryptocurrency. And the proof is the thew bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies change their value on a daily basis.
I would think twice about accepting opening the account to hi, It is risky to the first degree.
Kira forges Lew’s name as the drawer of a stolen check, drawn on Metro Bank, and makes the item payable to Kira. Lew is liable to pay the amount to
a.
no one.
b.
ordinary holders only.
c.
HDCs only.
d.
ordinary holders, HDCs, and holders through HDCs.
Lew has been liable to reimburse the amount to the holder due in course, it related parties and the actual holders of the check.
Option D is correct.
Who is a drawer?A drawer is referring to person who has created a check in the name of another person or any financial institution like banks.
According to the situation, the drawer of the stolen check is found to be Lew due to forged name put up by Kira. This shows that Lew is now become obligated towards all the parties in connection with the payment of amount being stated in the check.
Therefore, the ordinary holders, Holder due in course and its related parties are beneficial to be get reimbursed by Lew.
Learn more about the bank checks in the related link:
https://brainly.com/question/9892102
#SPJ2