courts that can review matters relating to the disposition of property of deceased people are referred to as what?

Answer:

False

Explanation:

The correct option is: a. Employee contracts.The shipboard articles that individuals had to sign before joining a pirate ship can be considered similar to modern-day employee contracts.

These articles outlined the terms and conditions of employment, including the rights and responsibilities of the crew members, the duration of their service, the distribution of captured goods, and the code of conduct to be followed aboard the ship. Similarly, employee contracts in modern organizations establish the terms of employment, including job responsibilities, compensation, benefits, and other relevant terms and conditions.

To know more about Employee contract visit-

brainly.com/question/30483563

#SPJ11

Socrates, the Socratic Method is a dialogue between the teacher and the students, which is instigated by the continual questioning and investigation of the teacher. This dialogue is an effort to investigate the underlying beliefs that shape the student's views and opinions. Socrates, the Socratic Method was named after Socrates.

This is further explained below.

Generally, The most useful true knowledge, according to Socrates during the trial, consists in realizing that you are ignorant of everything.

Socrates prioritized education throughout his life because he held the view that "the power to distinguish between good and wrong lay in people's motivation today, not in society."

For Socrates, getting to know someone was the most important aspect.

The Socratic method often referred to as the Elenchus method, the elenctic method, or the Socratic debate is a cooperative arguing discussion style focused on questions and responses that draw out ideas and underlying presuppositions.

See here for additional information about Socrates:

https://brainly.com/question/12714002

#SPJ1

The first thing to check is the correctness of the encryption key.

The first thing to check in this scenario is whether the encryption key entered by Jeff is correct.

When connecting to a wireless network, the encryption key (also known as the Wi-Fi password or passphrase) is required to establish a secure connection

. If the encryption key entered by Jeff is incorrect, it will not match the security settings of the company's wireless network, resulting in a failed connection attempt.

To resolve the issue, the help desk should verify the correct encryption key for the company's wireless network. This can be done by checking the network's documentation, contacting the network administrator, or referring to any provided instructions or credentials.

By ensuring the accuracy of the encryption key, Jeff can establish a successful connection to the company's wireless network and avoid being booted off after entering the incorrect encryption key.

Learn more about encryption key.

brainly.com/question/11442782

#SPJ11

Answer:

The use of cargo containers benefit the economy by keeping distribution costs low.

Explanation:

Hope it helps

According to ti American Law, the incentives that encourage the use of plea bargains include prosecutors can avoid trials.

Plea Bargain is a term that is used to describe the practice of negotiating an agreement in law.

The Plea Bargain usually occurred between the prosecution and the defense whereby the defendant pleads guilty to a lesser offense.

Usually, various incentives encourage the use of plea bargains, these incentives can be regarded as the advantages of plea margins, and my lawyers have used them to assist their clients.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that there various benefits or incentives to use of plea bargain.

Learn more about Plea Bargain here: https://brainly.com/question/8436096

#SPJ1

According to Cohen's theory of delinquent subcultures, such subcultures are rooted in a variety of factors, including frustration, status deprivation, and cultural conflict. These subcultures emerge as a response to the limitations and constraints imposed by mainstream society on individuals who are unable to meet its expectations and norms.

However, Cohen argued that these subcultures are not rooted in social or economic deprivation, as is often assumed. Instead, he maintained that they are more likely to arise in middle-class youth who have failed to achieve success in traditional middle-class pursuits such as education or careers. Thus, according to Cohen, delinquent subcultures are rooted in frustration and a sense of alienation from mainstream society, rather than in poverty or material deprivation.
Hi! According to Cohen, delinquent subcultures are rooted in several factors, but without knowing the specific options, I can provide a general overview of his theories. Cohen's work on delinquent subcultures revolves around the idea that these subcultures emerge as a response to social strain and a lack of opportunities for success in mainstream society.

Some of the key factors that Cohen identifies as contributing to the development of delinquent subcultures include:

1. Frustration with societal expectations and a lack of legitimate means to achieve them, leading to the formation of alternative value systems.
2. The influence of peer groups, where individuals who experience similar frustrations bond together and create their own norms and values.
3. The concept of "status frustration," which occurs when lower-class individuals are unable to achieve the same status and respect as their middle-class counterparts, leading them to reject mainstream values and seek status through alternative means.

While these factors contribute to the emergence of delinquent subcultures, it is important to remember that not all individuals facing social strain and limited opportunities will become involved in delinquent activities. Individual factors, such as resilience and personal values, can also play a role in determining whether someone is drawn into a delinquent subculture.

To know more about delinquent visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12999969

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

C

The answer is C, ​became effective on May 5th. Prior to the 5th, our subject Sam was not aware of the revocation. On the 5th, when Sam received the letter, Ralph at that point had officially revoked the offer.

I hope I've helped! :)

Ida left $50,000 to Emily, a boat for Mark and $20,000 for Kate which must be paid from the proceeds after the sale of Ida's General Motors stock. After Ida's death the legacy that were left was $20,000 for Emily,  Ida's boat has been destroyed in a storm, and Ida sold her General Motors stock.

What is legacy?

“Legacy” is something that is passed on. Leaving a legacy means giving something that will be valued and treasured by those who survive after  death.

Though Ida left $50,000 to Emily, a boat for Mark and $20,000 for Kate but  Ida gave Emily $20,000 with the intent that such payment is in lieu of the legacy. But, . Ida's boat has been destroyed in a storm, and Ida sold her General Motors stock.

Therefore, only Emily got $20,000 as legacy from Ida, but nothing was left for Kate and Mark.

To learn more about legacy, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29468465

#SPJ1

Answer:

True

Explanation:

The word corspe is derived from corpus, in Latin it means "body of defense".

To prove the insanity defence, it must be unequivocally shown that the accused was suffering from a mental disorder at the time of the crime, impairing their ability to reason.

A more wide and general term than "insanity" is "mental disease." Insanity is typically used to describe extreme situations including psychotic-like dissociations from reality, whereas mental illness can refer to both severe and milder types of mental difficulties (such as anxiety disorders and mild depressions).

Legal insanity simply means that the person must have been experiencing mental disease at the time of the conduct, as well as losing their capacity for reason. That person is plainly shown to be incompetent in Section 84 of the IPC.

Learn more about guilty.

https://brainly.com/question/29630313

#SPJ4

waiver of liability, a statement releasing one of the parties to an agreement from all liability, regardless of who is at fault.

An agreement to refrain from suing someone due to a circumstance or incident is known as a waiver of liability. Before skydiving, for instance, you can sign a liability waiver. You accept the risk of harm by signing the waiver, and you also agree not to bring legal action against the provider of the skydiving. The Release of Liability Forms can be used to draught a liability waiver. These are typically written in the form of a paragraph with a clear statement. The following items or parts may be found in a liability waiver form for an activity, but they are not all mentioned here. Regarding any activities in which participation by minors is not employment until an agreement similar to this is made, a minor waiver of liability form is completed and signed by the minor's parent or guardian.

To know more about employment refer :

brainly.com/question/30451144

#SPJ4

Answer:

itz a case...

Explanation:

Renowned forensic scientist Henry Lee said Thursday that the O.J. Simpson double-murder trial in 1995 not only revealed the racial chasm in America but the importance of strictly following established protocols in processing crime scenes.

“There were so many issues with the major crime scene in that case,” said Mr. Lee, who holds a doctorate and who testified for five days as a defense expert for Simpson. “This case set the landmarks for crime scene and laboratory handling of evidence.’

Mr. Lee’s comments came on the first day of the two-day inaugural conference “Pioneers of Forensic Science,” at which he is the first honoree. One of the world’s foremost criminalists, Mr. Lee has been involved in the Laci Peterson, JonBenet Ramsey, Caylee Anthony and Vince Foster cases, among many others.

Mr. Lee, Connecticut’s chief emeritus of scientific services, has served as that state’s commissioner of public safety, forensic science laboratory director and chief criminalist. He is the founder of the University of New Haven’s Henry C. Lee Institute of Forensic Science and is the namesake of its Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice and Forensic Sciences.

He spoke on a panel “People v. O.J. Simpson: An Interdisciplinary Retrospective on the Case that Brought Forensic Science to the World.”

Other panelists included F. Lee Bailey, a member of Simpson’s “Dream Team” of defense attorneys; Dr. Michael Baden, former chief medical examiner for New York City who also was a Simpson defense expert; and Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, Pittsburgh’s renowned forensic pathologist who was an expert commentator on the Simpson case on national television programs. He also is the namesake of Duquesne University’s Cyril H. Wecht Institute of Forensic Science and Law, the conference sponsor. University President Kenneth G. Gormley, who holds law degree, moderated the two-hour panel discussion.

A native of China, Mr. Lee said he had no idea who Mr. Simpson was when he was asked to be an expert for him at trial. He reconstructed the crime scene and examined every piece of evidence collected.

“I knew there was something wrong with the case by the physical evidence. There were lots of problems.”

He discovered that notes taken by Los Angeles Police Department criminalists at the scene were later substituted with other documents. “We found this out because the notes are stapled, but we found extra staple holes,” meaning they had been re-stapled.

Mr. Lee recounted his testimony about a crucial piece of the prosecution’s evidence—a bloodstain found on the walkway outside the Bundy Drive home where Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman were killed in June 1994.

DNA tests indicated O.J. Simpson was the likely source of the blood, but Mr. Lee testified he was suspicious because he discovered four small patches of blood on the paper packet wrapped around the Bundy evidence. That would indicate the blood swatches were wet and leaked onto the paper, yet LAPD technicians had testified that they left the swatches to dry overnight.

Asked by defense attorney Barry Scheck to account for the stains, Mr. Lee famously answered, “The only explanation I can give under these circumstances is, something’s wrong.”

As a scientist, Mr. Lee wouldn’t speculate either at the trial or at Thursday’s conference about how that could have occurred, but Mr. Bailey isn’t a scientist, so he wasn’t so circumspect. That evidence and the infamous glove and the bloody sock and anything else indicating Simpson’s guilt was planted, he said.

Answer:

uhm go to prom with that man rn IF U DONT-

Explanation:

do it you only live once. you guys obviously know each other. your mom never has to know

Answer:

No

Explanation:

just tell him sorry and that my mom doesnt allow me. and try to sound as sad and pitiful as possible

Answer:

18 for private sell / 21 for a federally licensed dealer

Explanation:

Answer:

One way we can contribute to keep our city clean is to podcast how dirty and filthy our society is, in that way the goverment will do somethings about it, but since we should keep our own path clean maybe consider cleaning up things you see when you go out.

I hope this helps.

Answer:

responsibility are duties to fulfill.

if you are asking question from social studies this is the answer.

Minimum wage laws can have a modest impact on reducing overall poverty rates, but their effectiveness depends on various factors such as the level of the minimum wage, local cost of living, and labor market conditions.

Minimum wage laws can provide a higher income floor for low-wage workers, potentially lifting some individuals and families out of poverty. However, the extent to which minimum wage laws impact poverty rates can vary. In some cases, minimum wage increases may lead to job losses or reduced working hours, particularly in sectors with tight profit margins.

Additionally, higher labor costs can result in increased prices for goods and services, which may offset the positive effects of higher wages. Therefore, while minimum wage laws can contribute to reducing poverty, they are not a comprehensive solution on their own and need to be complemented with other anti-poverty measures.

Learn more about poverty: https://brainly.com/question/20702315

#SPJ11

Answer:

Precedent is incorporated into the doctrine of stare decisis and requires courts to apply the law in the same manner to cases with the same facts. Some judges have stated that precedent ensures that individuals in similar situations are treated alike instead of based on a particular judge's personal views.

Explanation:

Steven, a prosecutor, has decided to bring three other felony charges against Brian, in addition to the burglary he was originally arrested for. He is engaging in Horizontal overcharging.

A single defendant is unfairly the target of a "horizontal" overcharging of accusations. Every technical criminal transaction in which he took part may result in a separate accusation being brought against him, or the prosecution could break up a single criminal transaction into several component charges.

In legal parlance, "tacking on" extra charges that the prosecutor is aware he cannot support is known as overcharging. It is used to give the prosecutor more leverage while negotiating a plea deal. All of the charges in cases of horizontal overcharging may be true, yet the defendant cannot be found guilty and sentenced on all of the charges. In order to reduce the number and severity of charges, the defense attorney should begin objecting to the overcharging as soon as they can.

Learn more about Guilty here:

https://brainly.com/question/8193162

#SPJ4

Hi,

All legislative power in the government is vested in Congress, meaning that it is the only part of the government that can make new laws or changes existing laws. Executive Branch agencies issue regulations with the full force of law, but these are only under the authority of laws enacted by Congress.

Hope this helps! :)

The correct answer is option (C) Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican.

The Constitution was written in 1787, while the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776. There were other occasions when the United States was founded than these. These seven men—George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison—are regarded as the principal Founding Fathers in order of significance.

While many other people also played a part in the establishment of the United States, most people regard these seven to be the Founding Fathers. The Americas were found in 1492, according to Christopher Columbus.

To learn more about vote visit:

https://brainly.in/question/20481185

#SPJ13

Answer:

members of the House are elected every two years, whereas senators are elected for six-year terms. ... Senators are at least thirty years old and citizens for nine years.

Another difference is who they represent. Senators represent their entire states, but members of the House represent individual districts

Explanation:

The House and Senate are equal partners in the legislative process—legislation cannot be enacted without the consent of both chambers. However, the Constitution grants each chamber some unique powers. The Senate ratifies treaties and approves presidential appointments while the House initiates revenue-raising bills.

If the mails or other means of interstate commerce are used to offer securities, then the Securities Act of 1933 requires that the securities being offered must be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), unless they are exempt from registration.

The Securities Act of 1933 is a federal law that regulates the sale of securities in the United States. Its purpose is to ensure that investors are provided with sufficient information about securities being offered for sale so they can make informed investment decisions.

The act requires companies that offer securities for sale to the public to provide detailed financial and other information about the securities, the company, and its management.

Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 prohibits the offer or sale of any security through the use of the mails or other means of interstate commerce unless a registration statement has been filed with the SEC or an exemption from registration applies.

The registration statement must contain detailed information about the securities being offered, the company, and its management, among other things.

By requiring securities to be registered with the SEC, the Securities Act of 1933 aims to ensure that investors have access to complete and accurate information about the securities they are considering purchasing. This promotes transparency and helps prevent fraudulent or misleading practices in the securities market.

To know more about Securities Act  refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/31227421

#SPJ11

Answer:

The 1973 Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade was far from radical—it was the logical extension of Supreme Court decisions on the right to privacy dating back to the turn of the century and used the same reasoning that guarantees our right to refuse medical treatment and the freedom to resist government search and seizure. In finding that the constitutional right to privacy encompasses a woman’s right to choose whether or not to continue a pregnancy, the Supreme Court continued a long line of decisions that rejected government interference in life’s most personal decisions. What follows is an outline of selected Supreme Court decisions showing how the Court’s views on abortion and the right to privacy have evolved. May 25, 1891, Union Pacific Railway Co. v.  The Supreme Court rejected the right of a defendant in a civil action to compel the plaintiff to submit to physical examination, writing that “No right is held more sacred, or is more carefully guarded, by the common law, than the right of every individual to the possession and control of his own person, free from all restraint or interference of others ….”June 4, 1928,  v. United States: In a wiretapping case, Justice Brandeis, dissenting, wrote broadly of the right to be “let alone”:

Answer:

One concern over money for bail is that it can create a two-tiered system of justice, where those who can afford to pay for bail can get out of jail while awaiting trial, while those who cannot afford to pay for bail remain in jail. This can lead to unequal treatment and outcomes for defendants based on their financial status. Another concern is that bail can be used as a tool to keep defendants in jail even if they are not a flight risk or pose a danger to the community, simply because they cannot afford to pay for bail.

I do have these concerns. I support alternate programs such as pretrial release or supervision, where defendants are released from jail but monitored by pretrial services staff or a court officer. I believe these programs can protect victims by ensuring that defendants are not released if they are a danger to the community or are likely to flee.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!