Combining two drugs can intensify the effects this is called what

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Incorporation is the legal process used to form a corporate entity or company. A corporation is the resulting legal entity that separates the firm's assets and income from its owners and investors

Read it and think what is the correct answer

It is not appropriate for a Loss Prevention Officer to physically restrain or handcuff a child (5-13) to protect store property, as it should only be used in situations where there is an imminent threat to safety.

A Loss Prevention Officer is an employee of a business who is responsible for preventing theft and other losses within the store.

A Loss Prevention Officer should not physically restrain or handcuff a child (aged 5-13) to protect store property. The use of physical force or restraints should only be used in situations where there is a clear and imminent threat to the safety of the public or the officer, and where it is necessary to prevent harm.

The use of force on a child should be a last resort and must be proportionate to the situation. Additionally, many jurisdictions have laws and regulations in place that prohibit the use of physical force or restraints on minors, except in extreme cases of danger.

Learn more about Loss Prevention Officer on:

https://brainly.com/question/30214543

#SPJ1

To complete a notarization, it is enough for a notary public to place a stamp on the record and signature ----- False

A notary public, a licensed public officer who acts as an impartial witness to the signing of documents and determines the authenticity of the signatures, certifies a notarized letter or document. To verify the signature on your letter or legal document, you need the seal and signature of a notary public.

A notarial certificate is a written statement that the notary public signs and seals to confirm the facts of a notarial act. A notary's most common duties as a notary include administering oaths and accepting acknowledgments.

When a document has a notary seal on it, the court knows that the signatures are genuine and not fake because the notary seal is there to verify this.

Learn more about notarizing document :

brainly.com/question/14477099

#SPJ1

The debate over the new constitution came down to two competing plans, each named after one of the states, Virginia and New Jersey.

Here are some of the significant events that took place at the Constitutional Convention: James Madison and other delegates offered their vision for a new government's shape and powers. On May 25, 1787, the convention officially began in Philadelphia. The New Jersey Plan and the Virginia Plan were two proposals introduced during the Constitutional Convention for the United States' new Constitution.

The Virginia Plan, which was proposed by James Madison, favored a two-house legislature and proportional representation in Congress. Large states, like Virginia, supported this plan because it benefited them. This plan also proposed a national judiciary and an executive branch elected by the legislature. The New Jersey Plan, proposed by William Paterson, advocated for a unicameral legislature with one vote per state.

Small states, such as New Jersey, backed this plan because it helped them. This plan also strengthened Congress's power to regulate commerce and levy taxes. The New Jersey Plan's ideas were eventually incorporated into the Great Compromise, which proposed a bicameral legislature with one house based on population and another with equal representation for each state.

Learn more about bicameral legislature https://brainly.com/question/491088

#SPJ11

Answer:

A. True

Hope this helps

Answer:

A,BC=Economic policy

D=Social policy

E=foreign policy

Explanation:

Answer:

1. Economic

2. Economic

3. Economic

4. Social

5. Foreign

Explanation:

Answer:

$1,575

Explanation:

Calculation for the maximum amount that she may contribute to either a traditional or Roth IRA for the year 2019

Based on the information given the maximum or highest amount that she may contribute to either a traditional or Roth IRA for the year 2019 will be the amount of $1,575 reason been that a person or an individual which age is less than the age of 50 can have a maximum contribution of the amount of $6,000 for either a traditional or Roth IRA for the year 2019 in which it can not in any way exceeds the earnings and secondly Investment income are not contributed to IRA which means that in the case of Victoria the amount of $1,575 will be contributed to either a traditional or Roth IRA while the amount of $100 which was earned as a result of her interest from her saving account will not be contributed.

Therefore the maximum amount that she may contribute to either a traditional or Roth IRA for the year 2019 will be $1,575

The Fourteenth Amendment states that no one shall be deprived of "life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." The Due process clause consists of various aspects, two of which are:Substantive due process- This principle limits what the government can do in its legislative and executive roles.

This aspect restricts the government's power to enact legislation that impinges on a citizen's life, liberty, or property without reasonable justification. Procedural due process- This principle guarantees procedural protections before the government deprives any person of life, liberty, or property.

In this aspect, the government must adhere to a fair procedure to avoid depriving individuals of their rights. For instance, a person is accused of a crime; he or she has the right to an attorney, a fair trial, and an unbiased jury.

To know more about Substantive, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/30562013#

#SPJ11

Incomplete question. However, I inferred you are referring to the prescriptive Period for violation of special laws as enshrined under Act. No. 3326​ guiding the Philippines.

Explanation:

Note that the prescriptive period refers to a legal terminology that simply refers to the maximum period (time) after an event before legal proceedings may be initiated.

Here's a summary of the act;

Section 1. Violation of special laws should be:

"(a) after a year for offenses punished only by a fine or by imprisonment for not more than one month, or both;

(b) after four years for those punished by imprisonment for more than one month, but less than two years;

(c) after eight years for those punished by imprisonment for two years or more, but less than six years; and

(d) after twelve years for any other offense punished by imprisonment for six years or more, except the crime of treason, which shall prescribe after twenty years. Violations penalized by municipal ordinances shall prescribe after two months. .."

Section. 3 defines special laws as acts defining and penalizing violations of the law not included in the Penal Code.

Answer: protesting without a permit, refuse to cooperate with police, shopping at stores reserved for the opposite race, and  boycott stores  

Explanation:

Answer:

best answer ever

Explanation:

So, if I am Prime minister of ..... l,  I may do the following things, and again, just because a PM says or does something doesn’t mean it happens automatically, you have to deal with individual ministries and civil servants, media, the opposition party, judiciary, and others, It’s not a dictatorship where things get done just by speaking. Anyway, here are a few things.

Rule of law: Yes, that’s my priority to ensure that Constitution and laws are applied to everybody, rich and poor, politically connected, and others. This will be very difficult in the case of a coalition Govt but it can be done in a majority Govt with strong will and good ministers in various places. What can be done?? Well, we can first start by prosecuting previous cases of violation of rule of law by powerful politicians and others, media can help in that. Giving resources to public prosecutors and hiring good people so that accused are punished. Increasing punishment for things like corruption (It’s just 2 years in Nepal for big corruption) can also help. it must be assured that nobody is above the law and that way, their faith in Govt and democracy will be restored a bit.

Expedite construction projects: We have too many problems in Nepal with slow approval process or red tape regulation and also with procurement and contractors, among others which delays vital projects like building roads, airports, bridges, pipelines for water among others and even if they are built, it’s of less quality because a lot of money is being wasted on commission and there is corruption. I will create a task force of expert people from all relevant backgrounds to suggest ways to expedite construction projects including Hydropower projects, try to find out root problems and how to address them, see if the problems are politicians bureaucrats or private sector, and give me ways. A PM cannot know everything and we need to rely on experts for a solution. One of the biggest problems in Nepal is that politicians here including PM believe only they are real experts and don’t need help from anybody. We need to change that approach.

Electricity generation: This is a must for economic development in Nepal because without electricity there can be no industrialization. As everyone knows, Nepal has a huge potential in hydroelectricity which is renewable but big projects have been delayed for a long time. We need to expedite such big projects but also help the private sector build small hydropower projects in small communities to make them itself-sufficientient. Nepal’s total hydropower generation many says is around 80,000 MW (I am not sure, need to look at that as well) and many in Nepal say, we must build hydropower projects to then immediately sell to India. I think, first, we should make Nepal self-sufficient and then only think about other Countries. Electricity can be used not just for regular stuff but also for industries, we can give thousands of MW to industries in Nepal that will employ millions of good-paying jobs in Nepal, we can use electricity to make Nepal a leader in electric vehicles, and using renewables. We import billions of petroleum from India, if we can only try to reduce it by using electric vehicles, esp in Kathmandu, it will make a difference. Again, these are long-term projects and only a PM cannot do anything, huge amount of cooperation is needed on all sides, from Nepali people to the private sector. Nepal govt can always give incentives like custom-free electric vehicles that are cheap to tax credits for companies among others.

C)A court that does not typically hear original trials, but whose opinions are regularly reviewed by other state courts is likely to be a(n) Intermediate Appellate Court

An intermediate appellate court is a court that does not typically hear original trials but focuses on reviewing the decisions and opinions of lower courts. Its primary function is to review and consider appeals from trial courts or lower appellate courts. The opinions rendered by an intermediate appellate court serve as guidance for other state courts, as they establish precedent and can influence future cases. These courts play a crucial role in the judicial system by ensuring consistency and uniformity in the interpretation and application of the law.

To read more about Intermediate Appellate Court click here

https://brainly.com/question/33718034

#SPJ11

Answer:

It is important because they can then tell the make and model of the gun used in the crime and possibly lead back to the owner of the gun.

Explanation:

I want to be in crime and have watched to many crime shows.

Answer:

14

Explanation:

In the 19th century, in England, John Bell was hung at age 14 for killing 2 people.

Answer:

I can provide a brief definition of each term and how it relates to American Government:

1. Supreme: Refers to the highest authority or court in the United States, the Supreme Court, which has the power to interpret the Constitution and federal laws.

2. Ordain: To establish or enact a law or regulation, often used in the context of the Constitution's preamble, which states that the document was established to "ordain and establish" the government.

3. Tranquility: Refers to the goal of maintaining peace and order within the United States, as stated in the Constitution's preamble.

4. Posterity: Refers to future generations, often used in the context of the Constitution's preamble, which states that the document was established to "secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity."

5. Statutes: Refers to laws enacted by Congress or state legislatures, which are binding and enforceable.

6. Monarchy: A form of government in which a single ruler, usually a king or queen, holds supreme power.

7. Treaties: Formal agreements between two or more countries, negotiated and ratified by the President and Senate, which have the force of law.

8. Treason: The crime of betraying one's country, often defined as levying war against the United States or giving aid and comfort to its enemies.

9. Preamble: The introductory statement to the Constitution, which outlines the purpose and goals of the document.

10. Interstate: Refers to commerce or travel between two or more states, which is regulated by the federal government under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.

These terms are all important concepts in American Government and have been applied in various ways throughout history.

The pedestrian may be held liable for negligence, and the girl may have a personal injury claim against the pedestrian.

In this scenario, the pedestrian may be considered negligent for angrily throwing the ball into the street, creating a hazardous situation. Negligence refers to the failure to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm to another person. By throwing the ball into the street, the pedestrian potentially breached their duty of care towards others on the sidewalk, including the eight-year-old girl.

As a result of the pedestrian's negligent act, the girl suffered serious injuries when she ran out into the street to retrieve the ball and was hit by a car. The pedestrian's action directly contributed to the chain of events leading to the girl's injuries.

Therefore, the girl may have a personal injury claim against the pedestrian for negligence, seeking compensation for her injuries, medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other damages resulting from the accident.

Learn more about: negligence

brainly.com/question/32769351

#SPJ11

Any attempted murder will most likely be guilty before the law whether the pointed gun is knowingly loaded or not.

The court rule that since the handgun was empty and unknown by the the assailant who constituted some extraneous factor, this is enough conviction of attempted murder.

Also, majority of opinion hold that a person that points an unloaded gun (pistol) at someone knowing it to be unloaded and pulls the trigger will be found guilty of an attempt to commit murder.

Read more about attempted murder

brainly.com/question/9574503

#SPJ1

Answer:

thomas

Explanation:

just did test

Thomas is a victim of identity theft because his credit card information was stolen and maxed out at a jewelry store.

Identity theft happens when someone commits fraud or another crime using another person's personal information—such as their name, identification number, or credit card number—without that person's consent. In 1964, the phrase "identity theft" was first used. Since that time, both the U.K. and the U.S. have statutory definitions of identity theft that include the theft of personally identifiable information.

Identity theft purposefully utilizes someone else's identity as a technique to acquire financial advantages or obtain credit and other benefits, and potentially to create other person's disadvantages or loss. When someone's identity is stolen, bad things can happen to them, especially if they are wrongly accused of being the offender.

Therefore, Thomas is an victim of identity theft.

To learn more about identity theft, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29898436

#SPJ7

Prisoners are often used as laborers sometimes in prisons. Separate Confinement is known to be a method of punishment used where the convicted people are often required to perform all of their productive activities from the cell itself being fully isolated.

The FPI's garment factory can coordinate its confined labor force using the separate confinement system.  It would be easy to coordinate as they can coordinate the work easily.

This is because the aim of the separate confinement system is for inmates to realize their guilt and therefore through the isolation, they can reflect on their actions and repent if need be.

For  productivity sake, FPI can make use of dimension such as 12 by 8 by 10 feet with a washroom, folding bed and  exercise yard attached  to it.

The rule of silence will in some way help FPI employees work more efficiently but not all because some people work better when they are interacting with others.

Because the use of a whip would not be tolerated today, To enforce the rule of silence through deduction of points. Where if a person work under silence, they are given point which can be used within the prison for example; an added spoon of food or to be free from a certain task and point reduce if one disobey.

I think  Elam Lynds would like the FPI as it is more better and improved system.

The people incarcerated in today's prisons is quite different  from those who were once confined in the Pennsylvania and New York systems as there are some measures of freedom and less costly than when compared to separate confinement system that is practiced in Pennsylvania which is very costly to maintain.

A work program will be effective for all prison inhabitants regardless of the historical time period because it will make prisoners to be more productive and be useful in life.

A work program would look like daily routines that prison inmates would be engaged in and actively participate in.

Learn more about separate confinement system from

https://brainly.com/question/11194584

Answer: attention to detail

understanding of government guidelines

knowledge of computers and electronics

aptitude for problem solving

Explanation:

Electrical engineers are the engineers that are responsible for designing, developing, electrical equipment, that are manufactured.

Some qualities that electrical engineers must have include the fact that they must be able to pay attention to details, have knowledge of computers, understand government guidelines and be able to solve problems.

Answer:

b c d e

Explanation:

is correct pros to guy above me

Answer:

so true

Explanation:

Answer: The United State government pushed for "plain language" after 9/11 because the inter-organizational discussion was hurt by codes. For a while, they pushed it hard (there may have been laws but I don't ken for sure) but later recanted and now "plain language" is only required when more than one organization is involved. From what I have optically discerned, many emergency accommodation men and women prefer utilizing the 10 codes, especially in certain situations where predilection for discretion is propitious. I do believe there should still be the implementation of it as simply saying 10-24 is better than yelling "f'ing send backup this man sent shots at me" but I understand stress can interfere with our competency to recollect certain things, especially in an emergency field. What's nice about 10 codes is that if everybody on the job understands them, you can convey a lot in a concise message. It'd be prevalent to describe how a tour went just with the mundane 10 codes. some people are immensely colossal proponents of plain English. You can articulate what is genuinely transpiring rather than utilizing pre-determined 10 code that may not be entirely precise. I cerebrate plain English AND 10 codes should be the default method of communication if you are in command or interfacing with certain agencies or predicaments. Clear and efficacious communication is often the first causality in the war of "oh shoot" calls. Though I can cerebrate of a few instances where, within a single agency and intra-agency communication, I believe 10 codes would be more utilizable than plain English. An area with poor radio communication may benefit from a 10-code that is able to convey an entire sentence. Or if you are unable for whatever reason to openly request a resource such as the police or convivial workers. That would be my modernization of the ten code

Explanation:

I'm kinda slow but had the same question so here was my probably bad  answer lol

Exculpatory clauses that result from superior bargaining power are usually found to be unenforceable or invalid.

An exculpatory clause is a contractual provision that seeks to release one party from liability for their own negligence or wrongdoing. However, when such clauses arise from a significant disparity in bargaining power between the parties, they are often deemed unfair and unenforceable. The courts generally view these clauses as oppressive and contrary to public policy.

When one party has superior bargaining power, it can exploit the weaker party's vulnerability and force them to accept unfavorable terms, including exculpatory clauses. To protect the interests of the weaker party, courts tend to invalidate such clauses to ensure a fair and equitable outcome in the contractual relationship.

To know more about Exculpatory clauses click here brainly.com/question/27222495

#SPJ11

Answer:

The good faith exception

Explanation:

The good faith exception is a legal principle that allows evidence to be used in court even if it was obtained through a technical or unintentional violation of the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. This exception applies when law enforcement officers act in good faith, believing that they are acting in accordance with the law, but their actions are later found to be in violation of the law. The Supreme Court has held that evidence obtained in good faith should not be excluded from a criminal trial.

Answer:

What is the difference between ethical behavior and legal behavior?

The distinction is important. Actions are 'legal' if they do not violate the laws or codes of the local government, state, or federal government. ... A formally adopted code of ethics is a legal requirement; when you violate a state or local government code of ethics there are specific consequences.

Explanation: