Answers
Collaboration between the government and public entities in South Africa is essential for the effective and efficient delivery of services to citizens. This collaboration also promotes transparency, accountability, and good governance.
One of the key benefits of collaboration is the pooling of resources and expertise, which can lead to better service delivery outcomes. This can include infrastructure development, healthcare, education, and other essential services.
The government and public entities also work together to address social and economic challenges, such as poverty, unemployment, and inequality.
Effective collaboration requires strong partnerships and communication between the government and public entities. It is important to establish clear roles and responsibilities, set shared goals and objectives, and measure progress and impact.
By working together, the government and public entities can achieve their common goals and deliver better outcomes for citizens.
To know more about government visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15077883
#SPJ11
Related Questions
why the existence of corruption can mean that not everyone can be equal before the law
Answers
Answer:
Corruption typically means dishonest or fraudulent conduct by those in power, typically involving bribery.
If there is the existence of corruption, the people who are so-called low class or poor can not get justice or what he/she deserves. People with high class, rank or social status will always be benefitted while other people can face ignorance or disregard from the concerned authorities.
Assume that you are an assistant buyer at Hollister. The fall merchandise has come in and your boss has
asked you to price the new crew neck sweaters at 75% above cost. Each sweater costs $26.00 wholesale.
What is the retail price? If Holister sold 350 sweaters per day what was the amount of total sales per day?
What is the profit on the sweaters if they sold that amount per day for the week? (assume they are open for 7
days)
Answers
Answer:
$45.50
$15,925 (TOTAL), $507(PROFIT)
$3549
Explanation:
75%=.75
.75*26= 19.5
19.50+26.00= 45.50
350*45.5= 15925 or 19.5*26.00=507 not sure which one you actually want.
507*7 (days)= 3549
Hope this helps:) Have a good day!
a release clause is usually found in which type of loan?
Answers
A release clause is typically found in a blanket mortgage, a type of loan that consolidates multiple properties under one loan. This clause allows borrowers to release individual properties from the mortgage by repaying a specific portion of the loan, providing flexibility in managing their investments.
A release clause is typically found in a mortgage loan. This clause allows the borrower to sell the property without fully paying off the loan. When a buyer purchases the property, they assume the outstanding loan amount and the original borrower is released from any further obligations. This type of loan is commonly used in real estate transactions, particularly in situations where the property being purchased may appreciate in value quickly. The release clause provides a measure of flexibility for both the buyer and the seller, allowing them to benefit from changes in the market conditions.
To know more about blanket mortgage visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28412031
#SPJ11
in the jenkins v. eckerd corporation case, the court ruled that:
Answers
In the Jenkins v. Eckerd Corporation case, the court ruled that a manager's use of a racial slur directed at an employee is not enough to establish racial harassment.
What happened in the Jenkins v. Eckerd Corporation case?In the Jenkins v. Eckerd Corporation case, a manager's use of a racial slur directed at an employee is not enough to establish racial harassment. Jenkins, a black female employee, alleged that she was subjected to a hostile work environment at Eckerd Corporation in 2005. She claimed that her manager made her feel uncomfortable in a variety of ways, including the use of a racial slur directed at her in the presence of other employees.The court did not accept her allegations, stating that the slur was not sufficiently severe or pervasive enough to constitute harassment. They also noted that the employee was unable to show that the behavior had affected her ability to do her job. Thus, in this case, the court ruled that a manager's use of a racial slur directed at an employee is not enough to establish racial harassment.
To know more about harassment visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12830365
#SPJ11
The events surrounding Tinker v. Des Moines involved a school. Which statement best explains why the Supreme Court ruled in the students' favor? The events involved symbolic speech without disruption. The First Amendment always applies to issues of speech. The events involved controversial issues. The protest was an act of civil disobedience.
Answers
Answer:
The events involved symbolic speech without disruption.
Explanation:
Tinker v. Des Moines was a suite filed against a district school in 1965. The case was on a public district school in lowa who suspended three students who were protesting for the Vietnam War by wearing black armband in the school. The armband that they were wearning were a devise of symbolic speech. Such protest and speech rights for students is protected under the First Amendment.
The students were protesting the war in Vietnam for bringing back the soldiers back home. The school suspended three students, who denied to remove the armband, and against this, their parents filed litigationagainst the school.
When in 1969, the case entered the Supreme Court, it ruled the suit in students' favor stating that their protest involved symbolic speech, which is protected under the First Amendment, and because their protest using symbolic speech was not bringing disruption.
So, option first is correct.
The events which surrounded the Tinker v. Des Moines case involved a school and the statement which best explains why the Supreme Court ruled in the students' favor is:
A. The events involved symbolic speech without disruption.
According to the given question, we are asked to show the statement which best explains why the Supreme Court ruled in the students' favor.
As a result of this, we can see that from the sequence of events which occured in the Tinker v. Des Moines case, the main reason why the Supreme Court ruled in the students' favor was because the events involved symbolic speech without disruption.
Therefore, the correct answer is option A
Read more about Tinker v. Des Moines here:
https://brainly.com/question/17535866
During a trial, what provides members of the jury with an outline of the major objectives of each side's case, the evidence to be presented, the witnesses to be called, and what each side seeks to prove
Answers
Answer:
Opening statements.
Explanation:
Opening statements, like the name suggests, are the starting statements that narrate the events of the case and what's involved. The prosecutor and the defense team will both present their opening statements, though the defense team is not normally required to do so.
During a trial, these opening statements by both parties will provide the jury and the others present in court the outline of the major events, objectives of their teams in the case. This will provide them the time to present the evidence, the witnesses t be called, and the objectives of the parties in each trying to prove their case.
Thus, the correct answer is opening statements.
a company's legal and accounting teams have decided it would be more cost-effective to offload the risks of data storage to a third party. the itmanagement team has decided to implement a cloud model and has asked the security team for recommendations. which of the following willallow all data to be kept on the third-party network?
Answers
The option that will allow all data to be kept on the third-party network is: D. Full data outsourcing.
Full data outsourcing refers to the practice of entrusting all data storage and management responsibilities to a third-party service provider, typically through cloud computing. In this model, the company's data is stored and processed on the infrastructure provided by the third-party vendor. The company no longer maintains its own physical servers or data centers but relies on the expertise and infrastructure of the service provider.
By opting for full data outsourcing, the company can offload the risks and costs associated with data storage to the third-party vendor. However, it is crucial for the security team to thoroughly evaluate the vendor's security measures, protocols, and compliance standards to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the company's data in the cloud environment.
To learn more about data outsourcing, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30168201
#SPJ11
In order to offload the risks of data storage to a third party, the security team has been asked to provide recommendations for implementing a cloud model that allows all data to be kept on the third-party network.
The solution that meets this requirement is to utilize a public cloud service, where the company's data is stored and managed entirely by the third-party provider.
To keep all data on the third-party network and effectively offload the risks of data storage, the company can opt for a public cloud model. Public cloud services are provided by third-party vendors who manage and maintain the infrastructure, including data storage, on their network.
By leveraging a public cloud service, the company's legal and accounting teams can ensure that the responsibility for data storage lies with the third-party provider, making it more cost-effective and reducing the risks associated with in-house data storage.
In a public cloud model, the company's data is stored on the third-party's network infrastructure, which is accessible via the internet. The third-party provider handles the storage, security, and maintenance of the data, allowing the company's IT management team to focus on other core business operations.
This approach provides scalability, flexibility, and cost savings, as the company can scale up or down its storage needs based on demand and pay for only the resources used.
However, it is important for the security team to work closely with the third-party provider to ensure appropriate security measures, data encryption, access controls, and compliance with data protection regulations to maintain the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the company's data stored on the third-party network.
Learn more about confidentiality here :
https://brainly.com/question/29504467
#SPJ11
What conclusion can you draw about why excessive use of force can happen sometimes in the fields of policing and corrections?
Answers
Answer:
Especially in the fields of police and corrections, excessive force can happen frequently because of a few things. The first would be bias, when the officer has premonitions about the victim. They act out of fear or on impulsivity. Also, the scenario and circumstances around the officer and victim can contribute to excessive force usage.
Explanation:
Look above :)
How come no one except me (in texas) cares about masks. there are new dangorus veriants that the vacene can not protect you from.
Answers
What was President Wilson's opinion in the Treaty of Versailles?
Answers
President Wilson's opinion in the Treaty of Versailles was a mix of support and disappointment.
He believed that the treaty was necessary to prevent future conflicts, but he also had reservations about its harshness towards Germany. Wilson strongly advocated for his Fourteen Points, which aimed to establish peace and self-determination for all nations.
However, many of these points were not fully incorporated into the final treaty. Wilson was particularly disappointed with the heavy reparations imposed on Germany and the loss of German territories. He also opposed the creation of the League of Nations without the United States being fully committed.
Despite his efforts, the treaty was ratified without significant changes, leading to ongoing tensions and contributing to the start of World War II.
Learn more about Treaty of Versailles https://brainly.com/question/1359438
#SPJ11
How many traffic crashes were report in Port Orange in 2019? please help need answer before 11pm
Answers
Answer:
Check image below sorry I couldnt get to your question early enough .
Explanation:
Ford, GM, and Stellantis produce electric vehicles. Provide an explanation for whether each of the following activities would be legal or illegal based on US antitrust law. (a) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agree not to lower prices for the rest of 2022. (b) Ford, GM, and Stellantis have electric vehicle factories in different US states, but they sell their vehicles in every US state. (c) Due to higher input prices (i.e. labor costs and computer chips). Ford, GM, and Stellantis each increased the price of new electric vehicles this year. (d) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agree to isolate dealerships into separate geographic regions of the US. Ford will take the Eastern region, GM will take the Midwest region, and Stellantis will take the Western region.
Answers
(a) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agreeing not to lower prices would be illegal; (b) having electric vehicle factories in different states and selling nationwide would be legal; (c) increasing prices due to higher input costs would be legal; and (d) isolating dealerships into separate geographic regions would be illegal.
(a) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agreeing not to lower prices for the rest of 2022 would likely be considered illegal under US antitrust law. This type of agreement would be classified as price fixing, which is an anticompetitive practice. Price fixing involves competitors colluding to set prices at a certain level, eliminating competition and harming consumers. Such agreements are typically prohibited under US antitrust laws, including the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act. Price fixing reduces consumer choice, suppresses competition, and can result in higher prices for consumers.
(b) Ford, GM, and Stellantis having electric vehicle factories in different US states but selling their vehicles in every US state would generally be legal under US antitrust law. This situation does not involve any explicit anticompetitive practices such as price fixing or market allocation. As long as each company competes independently in the marketplace and does not engage in collusion or other forms of anticompetitive behavior, their ability to sell vehicles across state lines is generally permissible.
(c) Ford, GM, and Stellantis increasing the price of new electric vehicles due to higher input prices, such as labor costs and computer chips, would likely be legal under US antitrust law. Pricing decisions based on legitimate factors such as increased production costs are generally within the purview of individual companies. As long as these companies do not coordinate their pricing decisions through collusion or anticompetitive agreements, they have the discretion to set prices according to their own cost structures and market conditions.
(d) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agreeing to isolate dealerships into separate geographic regions of the US, with each company taking control of a specific region, would likely be considered illegal under US antitrust law. This type of agreement is known as market allocation, where competitors divide markets among themselves, eliminating competition in certain areas. Market allocation agreements are generally considered anticompetitive and are prohibited under US antitrust laws. These agreements harm competition, restrict consumer choice, and can lead to higher prices. In the given scenario, if Ford, GM, and Stellantis agree to isolate dealerships into specific regions, it would restrict competition and violate antitrust laws.
In summary, (a) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agreeing not to lower prices would be illegal; (b) having electric vehicle factories in different states and selling nationwide would be legal; (c) increasing prices due to higher input costs would be legal; and (d) isolating dealerships into separate geographic regions would be illegal.
Learn more about illegal
https://brainly.com/question/27375182
#SPJ11
the plaintiff brought his car to a mechanic for a tune-up. during the tune-up, the mechanic removed the fuse for the brake lights and inadvertently failed to replace it, causing the lights to stop working. as the plaintiff was driving his car home from the mechanic, he was involved in an accident. the plaintiff, seeing a friend walking along the road, slammed on his brakes to give the friend a ride. the defendant, who was driving the car behind the plaintiff, hit the plaintiff. the plaintiff sustained severe whiplash from the accident and has sued the defendant and the mechanic. at trial, the jury determined that the plaintiff's damages were $10,000 and that the defendant was 50% at fault, the mechanic was 25% at fault, and the plaintiff was 25% at fault. the jurisdiction recognizes pure several liability and partial comparative negligence. how much can the plaintiff collect from the defendant?
Answers
Answer:
100,000USD
Explanation:
The HIPAA Security Rule contains what provision about encryption?
a. It is required for all ePHI.
b. It is required based on CMS guidance.
c. It is required based on organizational policy.
d. It is not required for small providers.
Answers
The HIPAA Security Rule contains what provision about encryption, It is required based on organizational policy. correct answer is c.
The HIPAA Security Rule requires that covered entities and business associates implement appropriate administrative, physical, and technical safeguards to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of electronic protected health information (ePHI). One such technical safeguard is encryption, which is the process of converting information into a secure code that can only be deciphered with a specific key or password. The Security Rule does not explicitly require encryption for all ePHI, but it does state that covered entities and business associates must assess the risks to ePHI and implement measures to reduce those risks to a reasonable and appropriate level. This means that if a covered entity determines that encryption is necessary to adequately safeguard ePHI, then it must be implemented. Ultimately, the decision to use encryption should be based on organizational policy and risk management considerations. Therefore, option C is the correct answer. It is important to note that while small providers may not be explicitly exempt from the Security Rule, they may be able to use alternate and less costly measures to safeguard ePHI.
To know more about HIPAA visit:
brainly.com/question/28224288
#SPJ11
Forensic linguist research has shown that valuable evidence is sometimes lost because suspects and witnesses are not
asked the right questions. Law-enforcement agencies now hire forensic linguist to
Answers
Law-enforcement agencies now hire forensic linguist to assist with investigations and interrogations by analyzing language use and communication patterns to help identify potential sources of information, detect deception, and interpret meaning
What does Law-enforcement agencies now hire forensic linguist to?Forensic linguistics is a valuable tool for law enforcement agencies that can help to ensure that the right questions are asked and that valuable evidence is not lost due to linguistic barriers or miscommunication.
Forensic linguists may be called upon to help with a wide range of cases, such as analyzing threatening letters, identifying the author of an anonymous document, or providing linguistic evidence in court.
Learn more about Law-enforcement at https://brainly.com/question/29422434
#SPJ1
Which of the following would be considered an example of "shaping moral standards," as
seen as a function of the law?
A) laws granting freedom of speech and religion
B) laws discouraging drug and alcohol abuse
C) laws providing rights to peaceful protest
D) laws preventing overthrow of the government
Answers
As per the given question, the example of shaping moral standards, as seen as a function of the law is laws discouraging drug and alcohol abuse.
There is no denying that the law plays a significant role in shaping moral standards. Laws act as a framework for social interactions and behavior in society. They often establish what is and is not acceptable in society. A moral standard is a moral value that is considered to be good or bad.
Morals are developed through socialization and passed down through generations as acceptable behaviors. There are several examples of how the law shapes moral standards, including granting freedom of speech and religion, providing rights to peaceful protest, discouraging drug and alcohol abuse, and preventing overthrow of the government.
The law has a significant influence on what is and is not acceptable in society. The legal prohibition of certain substances, such as drugs and alcohol, plays a role in shaping moral standards.
The law is designed to protect society from harmful substances and, in the process, shape the moral standards of society.
To know more about moral standards, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28953158#
#SPJ11
Which is not true of STRs?
a. STRs are found in all parts of DNA.
b.STRs are often about 2-5 base pairs long.
c. DNA contains hundreds of STRs.
d.CODIS uses STRs.
Answers
True or False. a creditor beneficiary can sue the promisor directly for breach.
Answers
Answer:
true
Explanation:
As an intended beneficiary, the creditor beneficiary can sue the promisor directly to enforce the contract.
A creditor beneficiary can sue the promisor directly for breach. The answer to this question is true.
A creditor beneficiary is a type of third-party beneficiary who benefits from a contract between two other parties, known as the promisor and the promisee. In this scenario, the promisor has made a promise to the promisee that involves providing some benefit to the creditor beneficiary.
If the promisor fails to fulfill their promise and breaches the contract, the creditor beneficiary may have the right to sue the promisor directly for damages. This is because the creditor beneficiary has a legally enforceable right to receive the promised benefit, even though they are not a party to the contract.
It's important to note that not all third-party beneficiaries have the right to sue the promisor directly. Only creditor beneficiaries, who have a pre-existing debt or obligation owed to them by the promisee, are typically granted this right.
In conclusion, a creditor beneficiary can sue the promisor directly for breach, which makes the statement true.
To know more about creditor visit:
brainly.com/question/31964370
#SPJ11
What types of evidence must always be turned over by the prosecutor to the defense in virtually all jurisdictions?
a. all witness statements
b. all open files of any type
c. all statements made by the defendant
d. all exculpatory evidence and all impeachment evidence
Answers
In virtually all jurisdictions, the prosecutor is required to turn over all exculpatory evidence and all impeachment evidence to the defense. The correct option is "D".
Exculpatory evidence is any evidence that tends to show the defendant's innocence or may exonerate them. Impeachment evidence is any evidence that may cast doubt on the credibility of a witness, including law enforcement officers or other witnesses. This includes evidence that may show bias, prior criminal history, or inconsistencies in their statements.
All witness statements and all open files of any type may be turned over to the defense, but this is not required in all jurisdictions. Statements made by the defendant may be subject to discovery, but the prosecutor is not always required to turn them over to the defense.
The correct option is "D".
To know more about prosecutor, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/12057544
#SPJ4
Which term refers to an institution created by a society to enforce public policies?
Answers
Answer:
Government
Explanation:
Democracies have something called the "consent of the governed" where the people trust the Government (institution) to create and enforce public policies as approved by the people.
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
Government
Explanation:
Did the quiz (k12) and got it right. It'd be awesome if you'd mark this as the brainliest answer :)
The main reason that there is no exact definition of the due process guarantees is that the?
Answers
Option c: the main reason that there is no exact definition of the due process guarantees that The Supreme Court only defines the guarantees on a case-by-case basis.
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the Supreme Court of Federal Jurisdiction in the United States.
It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all United States federal and state court actions relating to provisions of the United States Constitution or federal law.
It also has unique jurisdiction over a narrow range of cases, in particular "all cases involving ambassadors, other ministers of public service and consuls, and cases in which the state is said to be a party.
To learn more about 'supreme court', here:
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
Complete question:
The main reason that there is no exact definition of the due process guarantees is that the
A) Constitution is too specific.
B) guarantees protect citizens against unfair processes, but not unfair laws.
C) The Supreme Court only defines the guarantees on a case-by-case basis.
D) courts do not want to give away too much specific information to potential lawbreakers.
How is a student loan different from a scholarship? A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back. A scholarship must be paid back, but a student loan is not paid back. A student loan is a form of financial aid, but a scholarship is not. A scholarship is a form of financial aid, but a student loan is not.
Answers
Student loan different from a scholarship because: A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back.
Student Loan and scholarshipStudent loan can be defined as borrowing or lending money to cover your school expenses while scholarship is a financial aid or financial assistance to cover your school expenses.
When you borrowed money you are expected to payback but when it comes to scholarship you are not expected to pay back because the money given to you was free.
Inconclusion Student loan different from a scholarship because: A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back.
Learn more about Student Loan and scholarship here:https://brainly.com/question/488893
examine how religious code apply to various aspect of morality
Answers
according to the 10th amendment, powers not granted to the federal government would be delegated to state government or a the people. b local police. c the senate. d congress.
Answers
According to the 10th amendment, powers not granted to the federal government would be delegated to the state government the option is the people.
The 10th amendment has been interpreted to mean that the states have all rights no longer specifically forbidden them or now not given to the federal authorities by the charter (the concept of federalism). for example, the state of Missouri can regulate its personal school device, but it can not claim a struggle in France.
The power to enact crook legal guidelines belongs nearly solely to the states. that is because of the 10th amendment, which vests in states a police power to provide for the fitness, safety, and welfare of national citizens. approximately ninety percent of all crook legal guidelines are country, rather than federal.
The tenth amendment changed into included inside the bill of Rights to in addition outline the stability of energy between the federal government and the states. The change says that the federal government has best the powers specially granted with the aid of the charter.
Learn more about amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/687600
#SPJ4
Because cheetahs, Acinonyx jubatus, experienced a bottleneck event about ten thousand years ago, living cheetahs exhibit very little genetic variation compared to other living species of large cats.
Which of the following principles best justifies a claim that cheetahs, compared to other large cats, have a relatively low resilience to environmental perturbations?
Answers
The bottleneck effect best justifies a claim that cheetahs, compared to other large cats, have a relatively low resilience to environmental perturbations.
What is the bottleneck effect?A population bottleneck is an incident in which a population's size is significantly decreased for a brief period of time due to a catastrophic event such as disease, drought, or floods. This is sometimes known as the bottleneck effect.
When a population goes through a bottleneck, the genetic diversity of the population is substantially decreased, resulting in a small number of survivors becoming the progenitors of future generations.This typically leads to a reduction in the population's genetic diversity.
Genetic variation is a population's ability to respond to changes in the environment. Genetic diversity is the range of genetic characteristics inside and between populations. A low level of genetic diversity indicates that the species is less adaptable to new environments, whereas a high level of genetic diversity indicates that the species can handle a wide range of environmental changes.
Learn more about bottleneck effect at
https://brainly.com/question/30517113
#SPJ11
For many years, hospitals could not be sued successfully for malpractice because of the legal doctrine known as _________.
a. the almshouse exception
b. charitable immunity
c. separation of church and state
d. absolution
Answers
For many years, hospitals could not be sued successfully for malpractice because of the legal doctrine known as charitable immunity. Therefore, the option B holds true.
There are different legal doctrines available to the citizens as per the legal documents of the United States regulated under the National Constitution. One such doctrine is that of charitable immunity, wherein the hospitals do not have the capacity of being sued, as the doctors are legally liable for any malpractices that they undertake.
Learn more about the legal doctrine here:
https://brainly.com/question/986777
#SPJ4
What is the rule of law
Answers
Speeding is associated with over A 1/2, B 2/3, C, 1/3, D 3/4
occur on snow, slush, or ice covered roads.?
Answers
!!Take note 20 under the speed limit is impeding, also 20 over the speed limit can be reckless driving, or careless driving!!
In snow road conditions it is ideal to travel around 35 MPH, In rain road conditions it is ideal to travel about 45 MPH. !(Which is included on any type of roadway)!
!!If officer feel like you are operating your motor vehicle in a unsafe manner for the conditions, the officer can stop you and give you a ticket!!
What can officers do to maintain effective communication during emergency situations
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
In emergency situations like school shooting, bomb threats and other emergency situations, people will tend to panic. The officer would need to explain what is going and to calm the people down by keeping their explanation short. It can also save lives and reduce injury. Knowing the proper protective actions to take enables people to reduce their risks.
Explain how debt is actually a product that is bought and sold.
Answers
Debt is bought and sold because you produce the debt and so different offers are available in and say if you be part of their company they're going to pay off your debt, however you only get yourself into a lot of and a lot of debt with the a lot of businesses you move into with.
Debt is something owed by one person to a different person. Debt will involve real estate, money, services, or different thought. In finance, debt is a lot of narrowly outlined as cash raised through the provision of bonds. And a loan may be a kind of debt however, a lot of specifically, is an agreement during which one party lends cash to a different party.
To learn more about Debt here
brainly.com/question/11033370
#SPJ1