civil violation of a trademark or a patent is termed . question 7 options: copy breach repudiation injunction infringement

Answer:

Law of General Application means that the law must be applied equally, and must not be arbitrary or aimed at specific individuals.

Explanation:

Answer: patent pending

Explanation:

Answer:

Search and seizure, practices engaged in by law enforcement officers in order to gain sufficient evidence to ensure the arrest and conviction of an offender. The latitude allowed police and other law enforcement agents in carrying out searches and seizures varies considerably from country to country. There is considerable variance in the amount of protection given to the individual rights of the accused person.

Joint planning is a vital process that ensures military operations are conducted in line with national objectives. It involves collaboration with government agencies and stakeholders to provide the best military advice for the President and Secretary of Defense.

These options are designed to help address national interests and achieve the objectives outlined in the National Security Strategy (NSS) and Defense Strategy Review (DSR). At the strategic level, joint planning is a collaborative effort that involves various government agencies, military services, and other stakeholders.

The joint planning process is designed to ensure that military operations are conducted in a manner that is consistent with overall national strategy and objectives. It involves a range of activities, including the development of contingency plans, the identification of potential risks and threats, and the establishment of operational priorities.

Ultimately, joint planning is critical to ensuring that the military is able to effectively execute its mission and support overall national security objectives. By providing the President and Secretary of Defense with a range of options based on the best available military advice, joint planning helps to ensure that military operations are conducted in a manner that is effective, efficient, and consistent with overall national strategy.

To learn more about Joint planning

https://brainly.com/question/14337260

#SPJ4

Answer:

the right answer is A answer

Answer:

the one whom was assaulted ?

Explanation:

The given statement "the condemnation of private property for public use is allowed under the state's right" is True because The condemnation of private property for public use is allowed under the state's right, which is known as eminent domain.

This means that the government has the power to take private property for public use as long as the owner is compensated fairly.  Eminent domain is an important power of the government, as it enables the government to carry out public projects such as the construction of highways, parks, and public buildings. The government has to provide a legitimate reason for the taking of private property, and the property owner is entitled to just compensation.

While the government has the right to use eminent domain, it must also follow strict procedures and guidelines to ensure that property owners are not taken advantage of. The government must provide notice and hearings to property owners, and must provide just compensation for the property being taken.

In conclusion, the condemnation of private property for public use is allowed under the state's right of eminent domain, but it must be done with proper procedures and just compensation for the property owner.

Know more about eminent domain here:

https://brainly.com/question/2093245

#SPJ11  

The Air Force is considered an organizational buyer. The term "organizational buyers" refers to people who represent a company.

When making purchases, these buyers frequently consider both their own tastes and the expected preferences of the customers to whom the organizational buyer's business will sell. Retail businesses commonly utilize organizational buyers to select the goods they purchase from wholesalers and manufacturers. The organizational buyer needs to be fully aware of the most recent developments in the specific market they serve. An organizational buyer will evaluate risk vs. return differently than a typical consumer because they frequently make large-scale purchase decisions. Organizational buyers frequently take fewer chances than the typical consumer.

To know more about organizational buyer

brainly.com/question/17516100

#SPJ4

After his opening soliloquy, Hamlet confesses that he is a disturbed young man who, but for religious prohibitions, would have pondered himself.

Worshippers and believers engage in and are frequently commanded to carry out devotional or meditative practices including prayer, meditation, or specific rituals. One of the key components of the religious life is involvement in religious institutions, moral behavior, accurate belief, and worship.

Open, mature religiousness and spirituality were correlated with high extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, openness to experience, and conscientiousness and low neuroticism. Agreeableness, Neuroticism, and Openness to Experience were all found to be higher, lower, and lower, respectively, in religious fundamentalism.

To know more about Hamlet visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29549806

#SPJ4

Yes, a gang enhancement can be charged as an individual offense in the United States.

Gang enhancements are additional penalties that are added to the sentence of a criminal conviction if the crime is committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with a criminal street gang. These enhancements are intended to deter individuals from joining and participating in criminal street gangs, and to impose harsher penalties on those who do.

As a way of conclusion, in the United States, the exact laws and penalties for gang enhancements vary by state, but they typically include longer prison sentences and increased fines.

Learn more about gang enhancement here: https://brainly.com/question/16915248

#SPJ1

Answer:

ledger line

Explanation:

Answer:

Leger lines

Explanation:

Answer:

gagah means manly but whats the question?

Explanation:

Answer:

40%9:14pm

Which of the following is correct?

Merry buys stocks for $3,000 and sells them

a year and a half later for $7,000.

Merry has to pay short-term capital

gains taxes on $3,000.

Merry has to pay long-term capital

gains taxes on $4,000.

Merry has to pay long-term capital

gains taxes on $7,000.

CLOSE

County judges rarely have to hear legal cases. However, in situations in which a county judge has to hear cases, they are most likely to have to make a decision on civil and criminal cases.

County judges rarely have to hear legal cases. However, they are most likely to have to make a decision on civil and criminal cases in situations where a county judge has to hear cases.

In contrast to their trial court counterparts, who are constantly hearing cases, county judges rarely have to hear legal cases. Some of their judicial duties include providing guidance to other judges in areas where they have experience, such as family law or guardianship. They are also authorized to hear some minor criminal cases and juvenile cases in some states, such as Texas.

However, when county judges have to hear cases, they are most likely to have to make a decision on civil and criminal cases. Civil cases include those in which an individual or group seeks compensation or damages from another, while criminal cases are those in which someone is accused of breaking a law.

Learn more about County judges: https://brainly.com/question/7056085

#SPJ11

Answer:

Establishing factor is fear of violations and ending factor is prisoner's right movement.

Explanation:

The most important factors that is responsible for establishing the "Hands Off Doctrine" are fear of violations and to avoid collision between arms of government. Courts feared that separation of powers and federalism would be violated if courts intervened in the work of institutions related to the state. The hands-off doctrine ended of two factors i.e. the prisoner's right movement and activism of federal judges. The hands-off doctrine formally ended with two decisions taken by the  Supreme Court in the early 1970s.

Are you emotionally capable of operating a vehicle at that time?

Are the documents you need to drive legitimate documents?

Do you understand how your automobile works and the applicable traffic laws?

Read more about driving fitness here: https://brainly.com/question/15285947?referrer=searchResults

A few questions are:

Are you emotionally fit enough to drive at that time?

Do you have the proper paperwork you need to drive?

Do you know how your car works and what the rules of the road are?

Evaluating Fitness to Drive for Commercial and Private Vehicle Drivers describes the applicable national medical criteria that must be followed while conducting the test. It contains the examination proforma and examiner instructions in detail. The Registrar of Motor Vehicles is in charge of granting, renewing, suspending, or cancelling a driving license or an auxiliary certificate. Decisions on granting licenses are made after carefully weighing all pertinent variables, such as an applicant's health and driving prowess.

Criminal Liability & Insurance - Health professionals may be held civilly responsible if a court determines that they failed to take reasonable precautions to guarantee that intoxicated drivers only operate vehicles in situations that do not place them in danger. Health practitioners may be held liable, therefore professional indemnity insurers may fairly expect them to adhere to national medical standards.

Learn more about drive assessment here:

https://brainly.com/question/30485324

#SPJ2

The federal law that granted federal officers the authority to free enslaved individuals who had been brought to the North by their masters and claimed as runaway slaves was the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850.

This law was part of the Compromise of 1850, which aimed to settle disputes between slaveholding and non-slaveholding states. The Fugitive Slave Act required Northern states to assist in the capture and return of fugitive slaves, regardless of whether they had escaped from a slave state or were brought into the North. It granted broad powers to federal officers and denied alleged fugitive slaves the right to a jury trial or testimony in their defense. The law was highly controversial and contributed to tensions between the North and South over the issue of slavery.

Know more about Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 here:

https://brainly.com/question/8719898

#SPJ11

Answer:

According to FBI statistics, assaults on police officers ______.

have decreased gradually since 2008

Answer:

true

Explanation:

its a basic human right to have property and those personal and medical credit cards count as property

Answer: True

I am very happy to help you.

Explanation:

Under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Supreme Court has incorporated certain provisions of the Bill of Rights, which have been held to be fundamental to our system of justice and liberty, into the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Selective incorporation refers to the application of the federal Bill of Rights to the states based on the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.  The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment states that no state shall "deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law."The Court began its selective incorporation jurisprudence in 1925 with the case of Gitlow v. New York, where the Court held that freedom of speech and of the press were "fundamental personal rights and liberties" protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment from state infringement.

The Court's selective incorporation jurisprudence has continued and expanded over the years, and today the vast majority of the provisions of the Bill of Rights have been incorporated and made applicable to the states. The Court's selective incorporation jurisprudence has been a critical component of our system of federalism, ensuring that state and local governments respect the fundamental rights and liberties of their citizens, which are protected by the Constitution of the United States.

To know more about Due Process Clause visit-

brainly.com/question/29398298

#SPJ11

Answer:

Anyone who commits a crime outside their country will be punished according to the local law of the receiving country. This has happened before for other Americans, some of whom made international headlines because of the crimes they were accused of. I think

Explanation:

Reporters are protected from retaliation under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which protects freedom of the press, as well as various federal and state laws.

One such federal law is the Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA), which protects federal employees who disclose information that they reasonably believe constitutes evidence of a violation of any law, rule, or regulation, or gross mismanagement, waste of funds, abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety.

In addition, the Privacy Protection Act (PPA) provides limited protection against searches and seizures of journalists' materials, including notes and photographs, in connection with criminal investigations.

Finally, some states have their own shield laws, which protect journalists from being forced to reveal their sources or unpublished information in court proceedings.

It is important to note that the exact protections offered by these laws may vary depending on the circumstances and jurisdiction involved.

To learn more about  Reporters  here

https://brainly.com/question/27937774

#SPJ4

The appellate court in Dixon v. University of Toledo held that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of wage discrimination under the Equal Pay Act. The court found in favor of the University of Toledo.

Dixon v. University of Toledo is a legal case concerning the Equal Pay Act. The holding of the appellate court in Dixon v. University of Toledo was that the plaintiff, Dixon, had not made a prima facie case of discrimination under the Equal Pay Act.

The court held that in order to establish a prima facie case of wage discrimination under the Equal Pay Act, a plaintiff must show that the employer paid employees of the opposite sex different wages for substantially similar work. The court reasoned that Dixon had not met this burden, as she failed to provide evidence of any specific male employee who was paid a higher wage for the same work as her.

The court further held that even if Dixon had made a prima facie case of wage discrimination, the University of Toledo had presented evidence that the wage differential was based on factors other than sex, such as education and experience. Therefore, the court found in favor of the University of Toledo and dismissed Dixon's claim under the Equal Pay Act.

To learn more about Equal Pay Act

https://brainly.com/question/1020025

#SPJ11

............................

The contracts in scenarios 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 are voidable, void, and voidable respectively.

In scenario 2.1, the contract between John and Andile is voidable. The factor that influences consensus is the false impression that John had about the seller. In scenario 2.2, the contract between Tshidi and Rabelani is void because it was entered into under duress. Kidnapping is illegal and therefore renders the contract invalid. In scenario 2.3, the contract between Maggie and Lelo is voidable. The false information provided by Maggie influenced Lelo's decision to buy the fridge.

Learn more about Contract here:

https://brainly.com/question/34698330

#SPJ2

In a negligence case, the plaintiff must establish duty of due care, breach, factual cause, proximate cause, and damages. Duty of care refers to the obligation that a person has to behave in a manner that does not cause harm to others.

Breach refers to a failure to meet the standard of care, which is considered to be negligence. Factual cause is the cause-and-effect relationship between the defendant's actions and the plaintiff's injury. Proximate cause refers to the relationship between the defendant's actions and the plaintiff's injury that is not too remote or unforeseeable.

Finally, damages are the injuries or losses suffered by the plaintiff as a result of the defendant's negligence. In order to establish negligence, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant had a duty of care, that the defendant breached that duty of care, that the breach was the factual cause of the plaintiff's injury, that the breach was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injury, and that the plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the defendant's negligence.

you know more about negligence pls visit-

https://brainly.com/question/32769351

#SPJ11

Answer:

By mutual understanding and cooperation.

Explanation:

Ethical dilemmas are evaluated by the individual when they work for their own interest and affect the other individual. For example, by taking the credit of other's work. In this example, one individual takes the advantage of the situation which is totally unethical. Such type of ethical dilemmas are resolved by the mutual understanding and cooperation of the two parties. Factors that are involved in creating ethical dilemmas are achieving personal goals and make advantage of a situation for your own profit and interest.

As per the cutoff in September 2021, not all 50 states in the United States have adopted the entire Model Penal Code (MPC) The entire Model Penal Code (MPC) was established by the American Law Institute (ALI).

The MPC is a comprehensive model code that seeks to harmonize criminal laws across jurisdictions and provide a framework for the revision and development of criminal statutes.

Whereas the MPC has been persuasive in forming criminal laws and has been received in shifting degrees by diverse states, it is vital to note that the selection of the complete code isn't widespread. A few states have received parts or areas of the MPC, whereas others have not received it at all.

The degree of appropriation and joining of the MPC's provisions shifts from state to state, and there's no definitive number of states that have embraced the whole code. A few states may have consolidated considerable parcels of the MPC into their criminal statutes, whereas others have made more restricted appropriations or alterations.

To learn about Model Penal Code visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31667549

#SPJ4