Answers
Cases that are not resolved through plea bargaining or by a jury trial are decided by a judge in a bench trial.
What is a bench trial?A bench trial is a trial in which a judge, rather than a jury, makes all decisions. A bench trial is essentially a hearing in which the judge presides over the presentation of evidence and arguments by both sides of the dispute. The judge decides the case based on the evidence and arguments presented, as well as the applicable law.
A bench trial is frequently used in situations where the facts are not in dispute, and the only issue is the interpretation of the law. This is more likely to occur in cases involving a legal issue rather than a factual dispute.
In a bench trial, the judge is responsible for making factual determinations and applying the law to those facts. The judge must decide whether or not the plaintiff has established all of the elements of the claim, whether the defendant has any defenses, and what damages should be awarded if appropriate.
The defendant has the right to a trial by jury in most criminal cases, but the defendant can also choose to waive that right and have a bench trial instead. The defendant may choose a bench trial if they believe that a jury might be biased against them, or if they believe that a judge is better suited to decide the case based on the facts.
Learn more about bench trial here https://brainly.com/question/3382182
#SPJ11
Related Questions
Select the correct answer. Santiago is a new manager at a restaurant. He is creating a system to prevent deliberate food contamination using the ALERT tool. Which action should he take under the term "Look" in the program? A. hold any product suspected to be contaminated B. restrict access to prep and storage areas C. use approved suppliers, who practice good food defense D. train staff to spot food defense threats
Answers
Answer:
B. restrict access to prep and storage areas
Explanation:
'Santiago, inorder for him to prevent the food contamination, he would need to find a way to restrict access to preparation and storage areas in the restaurant. This is because, the higher the number of people has access to those areas, the high probability of the food to be contaminated by some of thse people either deliberately or not.
An ____ pavement marking may be painted on the paved approach to a railroad crossing:
a. TXC
b. SXS
c. RXC
d. RXR
Answers
An "RXR" pavement marking may be painted on the paved approach to a railroad crossing.
The "RXR" marking stands for "Railroad Crossing," and it is a standard pavement marking used to indicate the location of a railroad crossing. This marking is typically painted on the pavement a short distance before the crossing to give drivers ample warning to slow down and be prepared to stop if necessary.
In some cases, the "RXR" marking may be accompanied by other markings or signs, such as a stop sign or yield sign, to provide additional warning and guidance to drivers. It is important for drivers to pay close attention to pavement markings and signs near railroad crossings, as failure to do so can lead to accidents and serious injuries.
to learn more about pavement click here:
brainly.com/question/26625853
#SPJ11
According to the Supreme Court, in a search incident to arrest, where are the police permitted to search if they do not have a search warrant?
The police may only search the area in the arrestee's immediate control.
The police may only search the arrestee.
The police may not conduct a search without a warrant.
The police may search the entire building in which the arrest occurred.
Answers
According to the Supreme Court, in a search incident to arrest, the police are permitted to search the arrestee and the area within the arrestee's immediate control without a search warrant.
The Supreme Court has ruled that police officers may conduct a warrantless search during an arrest to ensure their own safety and to prevent the destruction of evidence.
This includes searching the arrestee's person and the area within their immediate control, meaning the area from which they could obtain a weapon or destroy evidence. This principle was established in the case of Chimel v. California (1969).
In a search incident to arrest, the police are allowed to search the arrestee and the area in their immediate control without a search warrant. They cannot search the entire building or areas beyond the arrestee's reach.
For more information on search warrant kindly visit to
https://brainly.com/question/30080397
#SPJ11
For instance, imagine that a bank robber enters a bank, robs the bank, and kills a few people. This offender was unmasked and was caught on camera committing the crime. Under the theory of crime control model, what can be the actions taken considering the above scenario.
Answers
1. Immediate apprehension of the offender: The police should immediately apprehend the offender and bring him to justice.
2. Deterrents: The police should also implement deterrents to discourage similar criminal acts, such as increased surveillance and security measures in the bank and the surrounding area.
What are Deterrence techniques?3. Deterrence techniques: The police should also use deterrence techniques such as the death penalty or life imprisonment to discourage further criminal acts.
4. Increased public awareness: The police should also increase public awareness of the crime and the consequences of committing similar criminal acts.
5. Victim support: The police should also provide support to the victims of the crime, such as financial compensation, counseling, and medical treatment.
6. Education and prevention: Finally, the police should educate the public on the risks of committing similar criminal acts and provide prevention strategies to reduce the likelihood of similar criminal acts occurring in the future.
Read more about Deterrence techniques
https://brainly.com/question/14904611
#SPJ1
Which of the following is true about a majority decision reached by the U.S. Supreme Court?
A) All the judges agree as to the outcome and reasoning used to decide a case.
B) A majority of the judges agree as to the outcome but not the reasoning used to decide a case.
C) A majority of the justices agree as to the outcome and reasoning used to decide a case.
D) An equal number of judges vote for and against the petitioner and case remains undecided.
Answers
B. A majority of the judges agree as to the outcome but not the reasoning used to decide a case. A majority decision in the U.S. Supreme Court means that more than half of the judges have agreed on the outcome of a case.
But judges may have different reasoning or legal interpretations for reaching that decision. In cases where there is a split decision or a tie, the case may be sent back to a lower court for reconsideration or may remain undecided. It's important to note that the Supreme Court's decisions have a significant impact on American law and society, as they establish legal precedents that guide future cases and interpretations of the Constitution.For example, in a 5-4 decision, five justices may agree that a law is unconstitutional and should be struck down, but each justice may have a different rationale for reaching that conclusion.
The justices may write separate concurring opinions, in which they explain their individual reasoning for the decision, or they may join together to write a single majority opinion that reflects their shared outcome but not necessarily their individual reasoning.However, this is relatively rare because the Supreme Court typically consists of an odd number of justices to avoid such situations.
Learn more about judges here:
https://brainly.com/question/1059156
#SPJ11
Topic: Should gun control be tightened?
1. Does the historical evidence support the conclusion that the second amendment phone to the right of individuals to possess firearms?
Answers
Answer: Gun control should be be tightened depending on the individual, area, and motives.
Explanation: The 2nd amendment proclaims the right to keep and bear arms. This amendment shall not be infringed.
which case did the supreme court rule that the right to privacy extended to a woman's choice to have an abortion? group of answer choices
engel v. vitale (1962)
mapp v. ohio (1962)
gideon v. wainwright (1963)
roe v. wade (1973)
Answers
The Supreme Court ruled in Roe v. Wade (1973) that the right to privacy extends to a woman's choice to have an abortion. In this case, the court ruled that the Texas law criminalizing abortion was unconstitutional because it violated a woman's right to privacy.
The correct option is Roe v. Wade (1973).
The Supreme Court issued a historic ruling in Roe v. Wade (1973), establishing a woman's right to choose to have an abortion, which was based on the constitutional right to privacy. The court ruled that the state of Texas could not criminalize abortion, as doing so would violate a woman's right to privacy.
The decision in Roe v. Wade (1973) was controversial and has been the subject of debate ever since, with some arguing that the court overstepped its bounds and others arguing that it was a landmark victory for women's rights.The court's decision in Roe v. Wade (1973) was based on the concept of substantive due process, which holds that certain fundamental rights are implicit in the Constitution.
The court held that a woman's right to privacy is one of these fundamental rights, and that the state's interest in protecting fetal life is not sufficient to outweigh the woman's right to choose to have an abortion. In addition, the court ruled that the state may regulate abortion after the first trimester in order to protect the woman's health and the potential life of the fetus, but that it may not prohibit abortion entirely.
To know more about Texas law criminalizing visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29997458
#SPJ11
Which of the following events would NOT provide police with probable cause to search a suspect’s home? Select all that apply.
The police have fingerprints that link the suspect to the scene of the crime at the time the crime was committed.
The police have verifiable information from an informant that the suspect has merchandise taken in a robbery behind a bookcase in the living room of his home.
The police know that the suspect has committed robberies in the past.
They heard a rumor that the suspect had committed the crime being investigated.
Answers
Answer:
last 2, heard a rumor.... past robberies
Explanation:
What is the first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples like
me?
Answers
The first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples is the Doctrine of Discovery.
The Doctrine of Discovery was the first policy that impacted Indigenous peoples. The Doctrine of Discovery, which emerged in the fifteenth century, provided a legal foundation for European claims to land in the Americas, Africa, and Australia. Indigenous peoples' rights to land, resources, and self-determination were disregarded by this colonial system, which was based on the belief that Indigenous peoples were subhuman and incapable of governing themselves. As a result, Indigenous peoples were frequently exploited, enslaved, and subjected to cultural genocide.
To know more about genocide visit:
brainly.com/question/32013150
#SPJ11
you have _____days to file a complaint with the equal employment opportunity commission after the alleged incident.
Answers
You have 180 days from the alleged incident to submit a complaint with the equal employment opportunity commission.
You must lodge a complaint or request an investigation 180 days after the alleged act of discrimination or retaliation, so keep that in mind. An EEOC office near you can accept written complaints or ones made in person.
Calling the EEOC at 1-800-669-4000 or visiting the EEOC's Field Office List and Jurisdiction Map and choosing the office closest to you can help you locate the nearest EEOC office. The appropriate internal complaints committee or the local complaints committee must receive this complaint within three months of the incident.
Learn more about employment Visit: brainly.com/question/29318513
#SPJ4
Anyone know the answer to this?
Answers
in the book night by elie wiesel explain how the father/son roles had been reversed in the case of elie and his father. chapter 8
Answers
Answer:
The roles of father and son are truly reversed in Chapter 8 of Elie Wiesel's novel "Night," when Elie and his father, Shlomo, endure the challenges of the concentration camp together. The severe environment and terrible events they face cause this reversal.
Elie's father had been the dominant role in their relationship at first, offering guidance and encouragement. Their roles, however, begin to evolve when they are subjected to the horrors of the concentration camp. Elie is becoming increasingly responsible for his father's physical and mental well-being.
Elie recalls the terrible winter circumstances in the camp and the physical toll it takes on his father in Chapter 8. He talks about how he must look after his father, making sure he has enough food and shielding him from the camp's violence. Elie's devotion to his father's survival is clear when he gives up a piece of bread for him, despite the fact that he is starving himself.
Furthermore, Elie becomes his father's mental and physical support. He attempts to encourage and motivate his father to persevere in the face of adversity. Elie's job as a caregiver becomes critical as he attempts to hide his father from the worst aspects of their circumstances, providing him with comfort and hope.
Throughout the chapter, Elie's actions demonstrate his deep love and devotion to his father. He takes on the responsibility of caring for him, ensuring his survival and providing emotional support. The reversal of their roles showcases the extent of their bond and the lengths Elie is willing to go to protect and care for his father.
Overall, in Chapter 8 of "Night," Elie Wiesel depicts a reversal of father/son roles, with Elie taking on the role of carer and protector for his father in the face of the horrific hardships of the concentration camp.
In the book Night by Elie Wiesel, the father/son roles had been reversed in the case of Elie and his father. This is particularly highlighted in chapter 8.
In this chapter, Elie and his father are both in the same concentration camp and are struggling to survive. Elie’s father is weak, sick, and is not able to keep up with the work that is required of him. This leads to Elie becoming his father’s caretaker. He helps his father with his work, carries his father's weight when he can no longer walk, and feeds him whatever scraps of food he can find.
The relationship between Elie and his father is one of love and devotion. Elie cares for his father, despite the terrible circumstances they are in. However, as his father's health deteriorates, Elie begins to feel a sense of anger and frustration. He becomes angry at his father for not being able to take care of himself and for being a burden on him. He is also angry at himself for feeling this way and for not being able to do more to help his father. Despite these feelings, Elie continues to care for his father until the very end.
To learn more about Elie Wiesel visit here:
brainly.com/question/15099354
#SPJ11
What happens when people drink alcohol beverages
Answers
A small amount of alcohol leaves the body through the skin, in the breath and in urine.
The amount of alcohol in the blood at any time varies depending on the amount, the strength and how quickly the alcohol is consumed. Individual factors also contribute, such as body type, age, gender and how well the liver can break down alcohol to use for energy.
List down the duties and rights of students in the school. what are the duties and responsibilities that make you a responsible and productive citizen?
Answers
Answer:
you can modify it to your choice ..... hope it is helpful
in small claims courts, it is necessary that the parties are represented by a lawyer at all times. (True or False)
Answers
Answer:
false
Explanation:
it is not necessary
Exploring the Essential Question
Making Connections Imagine that you are a detective on the police force in your city. Your
supervisors believe that a local shipping and delivery business is really a front for moving and selling
drugs in your state and beyond. They think that the business receives large shipments of illegal
drugs disguised as car parts. It then distributes them around town using a fleet of delivery trucks.
As an investigator, what would you want to examine to learn more about this case and gather
evidence? Make a list of the places you would want to look, records you would want to see, and
evidence you might look for. How might your investigation violate the privacy of people associated
with the shipping and delivery business?
Answers
Answer: send an undercover officer in, tap the phones
Explanation:
The first thing you want to do is gather physical evidence, buy a used car part and see if there are drugs inside. You also wanna stake out their shop and observe their movements and if you see any make sure you get it on video and put it in your report. Also go through their trash and try to find physical evidence. send in an wired undercover officer, and tap their phones and try to catch any suspicious phone calls. Once you have done all of these things. type up a warrant and get it signed by a judge.
I was charged but do not have an account
Answers
Answer: nevermind, ignore me
Answer:
scam
Explanation:
hope it helps sayu ni
Help!!!!!!!!!!!!
A woman with a prior history of drunk driving was involved in a hit and run of a three-year-old girl. The jury found her guilty of manslaughter, acknowledging that she didn’t know the girl and didn’t plan to hit her. The judge sentenced her to 10 years in prison, citing that her careless and illegal behavior cost a young life and caused pain to a family. What goal of law enforcement does the judge’s reason cover?
general deterrence
incapacitation
punishment
rehabilitation
Answers
Answer: i think it's C, they want her to deal with the consequences
Answer:
general deterrence
Explanation:
it occurred accidentally it wasn't intentional
Aceable Driving Test
1. The 60 in 30/60/25 refers to the _______ insurance will covered.
A.) total amount
B.) bodily damage
C.) the maximum payment
D.) GAP Coverage
Answers
Answer:
A: the total amount it will cover I think
The 60 in 30/60/25 refers to the total amount insurance will covered. Texas rules require you to have at least $30,000 in bodily injury coverage per person.
What is insurance coverage?
insurance coverage is the amount of liability that a person can cover or entitle for a particular loss or damage against insurance services.
Insurance is of many types like auto insurance, life insurance, vehicle insurance, and others.
Thus, option A is correct.
For more details about insurance coverage, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15702391
#SPJ2
What to do during a traffic break?
Answers
During a traffic break, also known as a traffic pause or traffic hold, you should slow down and maintain a safe following distance from the vehicle in front of you.
You should not change lanes or try to pass other vehicles during a traffic break. It's important to stay alert and focused on the road during a traffic break, as sudden changes in traffic flow can occur. You should be prepared to stop quickly if necessary, so keep your foot close to the brake pedal.
You can use the time during a traffic break to check your surroundings, make sure your seat belt is securely fastened, and adjust your mirrors or climate control.
Remember to remain patient and avoid road rage during a traffic break. It's a common occurrence on busy roads and highways, and getting frustrated or angry will not make the traffic move any faster.
To know more about traffic break here
https://brainly.com/question/10629809
#SPJ4
key terms
public policies
legislative power
executive power
judicial power
dictratorship
democracy
Answers
Public policy is known to be a kind of an institutionalized issue or topic that is made to handle some key and real-world problems, guided by a conception as well as the implementation of programs.
What are executive and legislative powers?The Legislature are known to be the body that is said to be responsible for the making or the creating of laws.
The Executive is said to be the body that is known to use or put those laws into use as well as plans policy.
The Judiciary is said to be the body that administers justice by the act of interpreting the law.
A dictatorship is seen as form of government that is known by it having an unelected leader or group of leaders that tend to hold government power with some measures of limitations.
Democracy is seen as form of government where the people have the right to talk and decide legislation, or to select governing officials to do so in their place.
Hence, Public policy is known to be a kind of an institutionalized issue or topic that is made to handle some key and real-world problems, guided by a conception as well as the implementation of programs.
Learn more about public policies from
https://brainly.com/question/1064937
#SPJ1
approximately how many locally administered jails are in the united states?
Answers
Answer:
According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), as of 2019, there were 3,163 locally administered jails in the United States. These jails held an estimated 738,400 inmates.
It is important to note that this number may vary over time, as jails may be added or closed based on changes in the criminal justice system and local policy decisions.
There are approximately 3,100 locally administered jails in the United States.
Based on the Census of Jails from the Bureau of Justice Statistics, it is estimated that there are 3,100 locally administered jails in the United States. These jails are operated by local governments, typically at the county level, and are used to detain individuals who have been arrested and are awaiting trial or who have been convicted of a crime and are serving a short sentence.
Jails differ from prisons in that they are typically used for shorter-term incarceration and do not have the same level of security or programming as prisons. However, they are an important part of the criminal justice system and play a crucial role in maintaining public safety.
Learn more about Jail:
https://brainly.com/question/11084966
#SPJ11
What is a promise given in exchange for performance?
A. Offer
B. Discharge
C. Acceptance
D. Consideration
SUBMIT
Answers
Answer:
C. Offer
Explanation:
a p e x
Answer:
C. OfferExplanation:
which two of the following contribute to the political contentiousness of the judicial nomination process?
Answers
Ideological differences: The selection of federal justices, notably for the Supreme Court. Partisan Politics: Partisan politics has an impact on the selection of federal judges as well.
What are partisan politics?A person, group, or organization that supports or is affiliated with a certain political party or philosophy is said to be engaged in partisan politics. One of the characteristics of partisan politics is a strong identification with one particular political party or ideology and a determination to protect that party's interests and ideas, even at the price of negotiation or collaboration with other political parties. This kind of politics frequently fosters polarization and a propensity to view political events and judgements through a party prism, which causes strife and division in the political sphere. Partisan politics may be observed at several governmental levels, including in local, state, and national elections as well as in the creation and execution of public policy.
To learn more about politics visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/11487442
#SPJ4
sumulatng isang sariling karunungang bayan (,salawikain,sawikain o kasabihan)na angkop sa kasalukuyang kalagayan at ilagay ito sa isang bookmark
Answers
"Nasa Diyos ang awa, nasa tao ang gawa." - A reminder to take action and responsibility in the current situation.
"Nasa Diyos ang awa, nasa tao ang gawa."
Explanation: This proverb emphasizes the importance of taking action and responsibility in the current situation. It implies that while we can seek God's mercy and guidance, it is ultimately up to us to make a difference and bring about positive change.
This saying is relevant in reminding individuals to actively participate and contribute to improving the present circumstances. The bookmark can serve as a daily reminder to be proactive and accountable in facing challenges and making a difference in one's own life and the community.
Learn more about reminder
brainly.com/question/33438822
#SPJ11
Mr. Tan signed a contract to buy an apartment that has an area of 120m2 on the 12th floor of a 15-story building project invested by Ltd Company Vina Construction. When receiving the apartment, Mr. Tan was surprised to find out that it is on the 12B floor (Actually the 12B floor is the 13th floor) of a 19-story building. Mr. Tan complained to the investor about his apartment location in reality and required to move to the 12A floor or to the upper floor. Nonetheless, the investor disagrees and alleges that, according to the building numbering, Mr. Tan's apartment is still on the 12th floor. The apartment purchase and sale contract between Mr. Tan and Vina Construction did not specify it is on the 12A or 12B floor; thus, the company has the right to arrange this apartment on any 12th floor. Moreover, all usable areas and functions of the apartment on the 12B floor remain the same as described in the contract. Therefore, Mr. Tan has no right to complain to change the its’s location.
Mr. Tan is very angry with Vina Construction’s feedback and wants to seek legal help.
As Mr. Tan's lawyer, please advise Mr. Tan on the following issues:
1. Does Ltd company Vina Construction breach the contract signed with Mr. Tan? If so, what are the violations?
2. Which of the following ways Mr. Tan should choose to protect his rights: (1) Negotiate with Vina Construction on how to resolve the dispute, (2) Sue this company to court to ask for the exchange of the apartment location or demand the company to return the money he paid to buy the apartment? Give legal reasoning for your choice.
Answers
Based on the original agreement made, regardless of the numbering, the apartment is on the 13th floor.
What is a Contract?This refers to the legally binding agreement that is signed by two or more parties about a particular thing.
The violation which Vina Construction made in the original agreement was they did not mention that the 12th floor would be on the 13th floor, with different numbering.
The legal advice that I would give Mr. Tan about protecting his rights is that he should negotiate with Vina Construction on how to resolve the dispute.
This is because, going to court to seek redress would take a long time and an out of court settlement would be best if Mr Tan wants to quickly get his apartment.
Read more about legal contracts here:
https://brainly.com/question/8935110
Which statements pertain to civil law? Select all that apply.
purpose is to protect society
won on the basis of likelihood
won on the basis of near certainty
purpose is to uphold law and order
purpose is to uphold the rights of individuals
Answers
The statements that pertain to civil law are: the purpose is to uphold law and order, and the purpose is to uphold the rights of individuals.
The purpose is to uphold law and order: Civil law plays a role in upholding law and order within a society. It provides a framework for resolving disputes between individuals or entities and seeks to maintain order and fairness in the application of legal principles.
The purpose is to uphold the rights of individuals: Civil law is designed to protect and uphold the rights of individuals. It provides a legal mechanism for individuals to seek remedies and redress for violations of their rights, whether it's related to contracts, property, torts, or other civil matters. Civil law aims to ensure that individuals have access to justice and that their rights are respected and enforced.
In conclusion, civil law serves the purpose of upholding law and order and protecting the rights of individuals. It provides a mechanism for resolving disputes between parties and seeking justice based on the preponderance of evidence.
know more about civil law here:
https://brainly.com/question/31361988
#SPJ8
Which of the following does not have a four year term and a two-term limit?
Superior Court Judges
Supreme Court Judges
State Assembly
All of the above
Answers
Answer:
it’s All of the above.
Explanation:
I know this because the state assembly can have a 5 year limit and the Supreme Court judges have a longer period of time as well as the Supreme Court judges so that means that the answer is all of the above. Since they have more time to serve.
How have voting rights expanded over time? (think about the groups of people and the 6% we originally started at)
Answers
Answer:
Over time, voting rights have been expanding in a notorious and fair way. Thus, initially, only white men with high purchasing power of legal age could exercise their right to vote. Subsequently, the economic requirement was abolished, allowing all white men to exercise this right.
After the Civil War, the northern states of the country allowed African Americans the right to vote, while the southern states exercised segregation over them. During the late 1800s and early 1900s, women, through feminist movements, obtained the right to participate in elections. Finally, African Americans consolidated their right to vote after the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was passed.
What is the function of the Judicial Branch?
Enforce the Law
Make the Law
Execute the Law
Interpret the Law and settle disputes
Answers
Answer: The judicial branch is in charge of deciding the meaning of laws.
Explanation: Their whole purpose is basically to apply laws to real situations, and whether a law breaks the rules of the Constitution.
Judicial Branch are kind of like the Jury in the court. They are responsible for protecting the rights of the people. They give power to the people. They Have The Power to Get Its Decisions and Judgments Enforced. These are some of the many functions of the Judicial Branch.
Answer:
to settle legal disputes and determine the constitutionality of laws
Explanation: