Answers
Prior to July 2016, the age was 18, and it is now 17. Voting is also open to those who turn 17 in the election year. This means that a 16-year-old youngster who was born on the final day of 2005 is eligible to vote in a 2022 election.
Why is it important for citizens to vote?Voting is one way that citizens can take part in the democratic process. The people who will act as their representatives and further their objectives choose the leaders. Only citizens of the United States are entitled to the right to vote in federal elections and the right to run for federal office.
What meant the right to vote and what is the purpose of it?Voters are unrestricted in their ability to cast ballots for or against any candidate for public office, any referendum or plebiscite proposal, and for or against the government. subjected to any form of coercion that would prevent or restrict the elector's ability to freely express their will.
Voting is a process that a group, such an electorate or assembly, can use to reach consensus or express a position, typically after discussions, debates, or election campaigns. High-ranking government officials are chosen by voters in democracies.
To know more about Vote visit:
https://brainly.com/question/21093353
#SPJ4
Related Questions
Did you know that hate is made to protect love ones
Answers
There are nearly 100 district courts, a dozen circuit courts, and one Supreme Court in the United States.
true
false
Answers
Answer:
false
Explanation:
There are 41 district courts which is nowhere near 100. There's 13 circuit courts so that was 1 number off. Lastly there is only one Supreme Court so the last one is correct but overall the statement is false.
monsters are monsters in my book
Answers
Answer:
David rossi
Explanation:
Answer:
.
Explanation:
which of the following sanctions are awarded with the objective of ensuring that a party be in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed? question 20 options: compensatory damages exemplary damages punitive damages liquidation damages incidental damages
Answers
In order to put a party in the same position that they would have been in also had contract been completed, compensatory damages sanctions were given.
General Damages, often referred to as Ordinary Damages, are the harms that a contract violation will inevitably result in. In order to put a party in the same position that they would have been in also had contract been completed, compensatory damages sanctions were given. These losses are limited to immediate effects brought on by unforeseeable events. Damages that result from specific circumstances and contract violations are known as special damages. Whenever the contract is signed, the damages are pre-estimated and specified in advance and are paid out in the event of a contract breach.
Learn more about sanction
https://brainly.com/question/29547541
#SPJ4
what is the purpose of the pre-trial conference in a civil case? group of answer choices add members to a class action suit settle a case without having to go to trial have parties answer interrogatories depose witnesses
Answers
The main purpose of a pre-trial conference in a civil case is to settle the case without having to go to trial. It provides an opportunity for the involved parties to resolve the matter efficiently and often less expensively.
During a pre-trial conference, parties discuss the nature of the case, identify key issues, and often explore the possibility of settlement. The judge, lawyers, and parties involved in the case attend this meeting. It aids in simplifying the proceedings by identifying the main issues in dispute, eliminating unnecessary claims or defenses, and discussing possibilities for agreement. If a settlement is not reached, the conference can also help in planning the trial, including a plan for discovery and setting a trial date. By facilitating conversation and negotiation, the pre-trial conference can lead to a resolution without the need for a full trial, saving time, money, and resources.
Learn more about pre-trial conferences here:
https://brainly.com/question/13055704
#SPJ11
What motive does an interest group have to file an amicus curiae brief?
A. to file a lawsuit that will automatically originate in a higher court
B. to influence a court’s interpretation of law to a litigant’s benefit
C. to try to reverse the outcome of a previous Supreme Court case
D. to appeal legislation that it sees as harmful to its interests
Answers
The motive an interest group has to file an amicus curiae brief is to influence a court's interpretation of the law to a litigant's benefit. Therefore, the correct option is B.
The interest group's brief may help a court to better understand the issues, the potential impact of the court's ruling, and the potential consequences of the ruling for individuals or organizations not party to the case.
In detail, an amicus curiae is a "friend of the court" brief filed by an individual or entity who is not a party to the case but has an interest in the outcome. Interest groups are frequently the entities that file amicus briefs, and they do so to offer a perspective that may not be represented by the parties themselves.
In a legal case, the interest group files an amicus brief to support a particular outcome that aligns with the group's interests. The brief's content and argument must be relevant to the case, as the interest group is not allowed to advocate for issues outside of the case's scope.
The goal of an amicus curiae brief is to assist a court in making a decision by providing information or legal analysis. This information can be useful to a court, particularly in cases with far-reaching implications that may affect entities or individuals not a party to the case.
Know more about the an amicus curiae brief click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15520019
#SPJ11
What is the differences between law and ethic and law and religion?
Answers
— Ethics are a set of moral values an individual establishes for one's self and your own personal behavior. Laws are structured rules utilized to govern all of society. Differences between right and wrong or good and bad behavior. Laws are the rules a country or community mandates its citizens follow in order to regulate society. Religion is a structure of faith and worship. It's a belief system based on faith in a supernatural power.
pa brainlest po:) ThankYou
Hope it helps in you, GOODLUCK!
Community policing is not well suited to the new role local police must play in counterterrorism. T/F
Answers
The statement that community policing is not well suited to the new role local police must play in counterterrorism is a contentious one. On one hand, community policing emphasizes building trust between law enforcement and the community, which can be crucial in preventing terrorist activities.
Police officers who engage in community policing strategies are often better equipped to gather intelligence and detect suspicious behavior through close relationships with community members. On the other hand, counterterrorism often involves highly specialized training and equipment, which may not be prioritized in community policing budgets. Additionally, the emphasis on community partnerships may not be as effective in detecting lone wolf or online radicalization. Ultimately, the effectiveness of community policing in counterterrorism efforts may depend on the specific context and community in question. While community policing may not be a one-size-fits-all solution to counterterrorism, it can be an important tool in building relationships and preventing extremism before it becomes a threat.
To know more about counterterrorism visit:
https://brainly.com/question/519004
#SPJ11
The dying cancer patient problem 9.1
Answers
The concept of assisted self-killing is controversial. It is legal in some states and illegal in others. Hence, the exact answer to this question will depend on the state of residence of the patient.
What is assisted self-killing?Assisted self-killing is a medical practice where a terminally ill patient is provided with the means to end their own life, typically through the administration of medication. It is a controversial and heavily debated topic, with proponents arguing for individual autonomy and compassion, and opponents arguing against intentionally ending human life.
Wilfred's request was related to self-killing. From a legal standpoint, the act of assisting in self-killing is a criminal offense in most states. Therefore, Martha could be subject to criminal charges for her actions. If manslaughter charges were filed against Martha, and I were on the jury, my decision would depend on the specific laws and circumstances of the case, such as the laws related to assisted self-killing in the said state. If the pills had been given to Wilfred by a physician, the situation would be different. In some states, assisted self-killing may be legal under certain circumstances, such as if the patient has a terminal illness and is in unbearable pain. In such cases, physicians may prescribe medication to ease the patient's pain, even if it may shorten their life. Some argue that individuals have the right to end their own lives in cases of terminal illness and unbearable pain, while others argue that it is morally wrong to intentionally end a human life. Legislators may consider factors such as individual autonomy, protection of vulnerable populations, and the potential impact on medical practice when deciding whether or not to legalize assisted self-killing.
Therefore, the concept of assisted self-killing is controversial and the exact answer to this question will depend on the state of residence of the patient.
Learn more about assisted self-killing, here:
https://brainly.com/question/4748133
#SPJ2
The complete question is: Problems 9.1 Law and Justice Problem 9.1 The Case of The Dying Cancer Patient - Wilfred, age 75, has been suffering from cancer for 10 years. The pain associated with the cancer is severe and has become worse over time. Wilfred's doctors say there is no treatment to either slow down the cancer's growth or substantially reduce the pain. Wilfred asks Martha, his wife of 50 years, to relieve him of the terrible pain. He asks her to bring him a bottle of pills that will help him end his own life. Martha cannot stand watching Wilfred suffer anymore and gives him the pills. He swallows them all, slowly fades off to sleep, and dies. 1. Was Wilfred's request related to self-killing? Explain your answer. 2. If you were the district attorney in the state where Martha lives, would you file criminal charges against her? Explain. 3. If manslaughter charges were filed and you were on the jury, would you vote to convict Martha? Give your reasons. If Martha were convicted, what sentence should she receive? Why? 4. If the bottle of pills had been given to Wilfred by a physician instead of by his wife, would your answers have been different? Give your reasons. 5. If you were a state legislator, would you be in favor of or against a law allowing assisted self-killing? Explain why or why not?
Chủ nghĩa Mác-Lênin gồm bao nhiêu bộ phận cấu thành
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
3 là triết học, kinh tế và chủ nghĩa
Please answer each question in a paragraph. (a few sentences)
1. This congressional act requires people wanting to purchase a gun from a licensed firearm dealer to go through a background check. (five words)
2. A crime that occurs online, in the virtual community of the internet, as opposed to the physical world. (two words)
3. Probable Cause" as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court requires that a _______ person believes that another person has committed a crime."
Answers
1. The congressional act which requires people wanting to purchase a gun from a licensed firearm dealer to go through a background check is called the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act. This act became law in 1993 and is also known as the Brady Law.
Its main aim is to prevent the sale of guns to individuals who are prohibited from possessing firearms, such as convicted felons, people with domestic violence restraining orders, and people with mental illnesses.
2. The explanation of the crime that occurs online, in the virtual community of the internet, as opposed to the physical world is called Cybercrime. Cybercrime refers to illegal activities carried out through the internet, such as hacking, cyberbullying, identity theft, and online fraud. Due to the rise in the use of technology, cybercrime has become more prevalent in recent years, and it can be challenging to identify and prosecute offenders.
3. The main answer is that a reasonable person believes that another person has committed a crime. Probable cause refers to the legal standard that the police must meet to make an arrest or conduct a search. In the United States, probable cause is defined as a level of suspicion that would lead a reasonable person to believe that a crime has been committed. This standard is set by the U.S. Supreme Court and is an essential component of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures.
Learn more about Cybercrime: https://brainly.com/question/30457725
#SPJ11
What is the best method of submitting evidence to a crime lab?
Answers
Answer:
The best method of submitting evidence to a crime lab would be through personal delivery. Shipments through mail may be lost or misplaced, causing a contamination of the evidence and rendering it useless. The safe transportation of the evidence to a crime lab can only be assured through personal delivery.
Justification of 5th amendment and encrypted data. Discuss two
criminal justice cases in which they apply.
Computer Science and Criminal Justice
Answers
Answer:
Individuals are protected against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states that no one "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself." This safeguard applies to numerous types of evidence, including encrypted data. In computer science and criminal justice, the Fifth Amendment can be used to justify not providing decryption keys or passwords for encrypted data. Let's look at two hypothetical situations in which the Fifth Amendment and encrypted data collide in the context of criminal justice.
Case 1: Suspected Drug Trafficking
John is accused of drug trafficking, and authorities have secured a search warrant to search his property for evidence. During the search, they discover a PC with encrypted files suspected of containing incriminating information. They request John's decryption key or password in order to access the files, but he refuses, asserting his Fifth Amendment rights.
Justification: Because the Fifth Amendment protects him from self-incrimination, John's reluctance to reveal the decryption key or password can be justified. By handing over the key, John is basically handing over evidence that could be used against him in a criminal proceeding. Because it demonstrates knowledge or ownership of the encrypted information, the encryption key itself may be regarded testimonial evidence, potentially tying him to the crime. As a result, the Fifth Amendment empowers John to refuse to reveal the key, so protecting his constitutional rights.
Case 2: Alleged Cybercrime
Emily is accused of breaking into a company's computer system and stealing confidential client information. Law enforcement seizes Emily's computer during the investigation, which contains encrypted files that may reveal evidence of her involvement. They want Emily's decryption key or password, but she refuses, invoking the Fifth Amendment.
Justification: Under the Fifth Amendment, Emily's refusal to reveal the decryption key or password is also justifiable. She would be granting access to potentially incriminating evidence that may link her to the cybercrime if she provided the key. The encryption key can be viewed as testimonial evidence because it demonstrates her knowledge and control over the encrypted information, potentially establishing her guilt. As a result, the Fifth Amendment protects Emily's freedom to refuse to reveal the key, shielding her from self-incrimination.
_____
(The Fifth Amendment's application to encrypted data is a complex legal matter with varying opinions on whether disclosing encryption keys or passwords is a Fifth Amendment right. Courts may order non-testimonial evidence or acknowledge testimonial nature, impacting outcomes.)
A warrant is required when arresting a juvenile for a criminal act? True or False
Answers
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Let’s say this.
A group of teenage boys walks into a retail store, and an officer is 25ft from their presence. They run out of the store carrying electronics. The worker from the store shouts for someone to help them. The officer runs after the juveniles and he/she has the right to make a warrantless arrest on behalf of theft of property, which can result in a fine or time in jail.
So your answer wouldv’e been false.
If a juvenile commits a crime, a police officer or deputy can arrest them with or without a warrant. A warrant can be issued but is not required. Say, a 16 year old robs a store and flees, the cameras show what happened and what the 16 year old looks like. So pictures can be used to identify the juvenile. Miranda rights also have to be read to juveniles because just like an adult, they can refuse to speak.
Is it illegal to murder someone
Answers
Answer:
No it depends on how you do it self defense its legal just to do it its illegal
Explanation:
Some teenagers who have texted photographs of themselves, or of their friends or partners, have been charged with distribution of
Answers
Answer:
this is the distribution of intimate images.
Explanation:
this is when someone takes a picture of you without consent.
They are charged with distribution of intimate images.
The non-consensual distribution of intimate images (including videos) can occur in various situations involving adults and youth, including relationship breakdown and cyberbullying.
Jackie is cheated when she buys a defective car from Fast Eddie’s Car Mart. She attempts to return the car, but Eddie just laughs and tells her to go away. Every time Jackie has to make a repair on the car, she gets angry. Finally, she decides to wreck Eddie’s car to get even with him. Following him home from work one evening, Jackie tries to ram his car, hoping to bend the axle or frame. Instead of bending the frame, the collision smashes Eddie’s gas tank, causes an explosion, and kills him.
Answers
Answer:
Jackie needs therapy she's a maniac
Explanation:
Imagine you are the chief of police of your local community and have decided to
implement a community-oriented policing program. One of the issues confronting
your community is a phenomenon found in some urban communities called Stop
Snitching. Present your community-oriented policing program, including a specific
program that addresses this phenomenon. Be very specific; you are presenting this
to your department and community.
0
O
Answers
Stephanie was on medication for a cough when she was tested for alcohol levels using the PBT. Though she did not consume much alcohol, what could be the possible reason for a high reading?
A. The device was faulty.
B. She exhaled into the device mouthpiece superficially.
C. The medication contained molecules similar to ethanol.
D. Stephanie’s lungs are infected.
Answers
Answer:
It's C.
Explanation:
Edmentum/PLATO
In 1979, the pesticide use programs imposed by the California Department of Pesticide Regulations (CA-DPR) were declared by the court to be legally equivalent to CEQA. What happened and why is this ruling so significant?
Answers
The 1979 ruling that declared CA-DPR's pesticide use programs legally equivalent to CEQA was significant because it established the department's authority, ensured thorough environmental impact assessments, promoted public involvement, and provided a legal framework for managing pesticide use in California.
In 1979, the court declared that the pesticide use programs imposed by the California Department of Pesticide Regulations (CA-DPR) were legally equivalent to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This ruling was significant for several reasons:
1. Recognition of CA-DPR's authority: The ruling affirmed the CA-DPR's authority to regulate pesticide use and establish programs for their safe and effective application. This decision reinforced the department's role in protecting public health and the environment.
2. Environmental impact assessment: The equivalence to CEQA meant that CA-DPR's pesticide use programs were subject to the same rigorous environmental impact assessment requirements as other projects under CEQA. This ensured that potential environmental impacts of pesticide use were thoroughly evaluated before approving any programs.
3. Public involvement: The CEQA process includes provisions for public involvement and input, which allowed for greater transparency and public participation in decisions related to pesticide use in California. This aspect further strengthened the environmental protection measures and helped address public concerns.
4. Legal framework: The ruling provided a legal framework for the evaluation and management of pesticide use in California. This framework enabled the state to make informed decisions regarding pesticide regulations and ensure the protection of public health and the environment.
For more such questions on Legal framework, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/30750404
#SPJ11
Question
Refer to the article “The Future of Money” in your Money, Money, Money magazine for a complete version of this text.
How does the author best support the point that there are advantages to using digital currency?
Drag the correct answer into the box.
by describing ways that it can be safer and easier to use than traditional money
by giving opinions about benefits of using cryptocurrency and problems with using cash and credit
by explaining that digital transactions are fastest because they are handled by computers
Answers
The author supports the point by giving opinions on the benefits of using cryptocurrencies and problems with using cash and credit.
What Is Digital Currency?
Digital currency is only available in digital form. It isn't a material object with a physical actuality, unlike plutocrat or other goods like gold or oil painting. By streamlining the current fiscal system, digital plutocrat can grease briskly and more affordable fiscal deals. It may also make it simpler for central banks to apply financial policy.
Cryptocurrencies, digital currencies issued by central banks, and stablecoins are exemplifications of different types of digital plutocrat.
The amicable asset transfer and implicit reduction in sale costs are some benefits of digital currencies.
Digital currencies have some downsides, including the fact that they can be unpredictable to trade and are vulnerable to hacking.
To learn more on Digital currency from the link:
https://brainly.com/question/28963893
#SPJ1
The _______ requires federally licensed firearms dealers to perform background checks on prospective firearms purchasers to ensure that the firearm transfer would not violate federal, state, or local law.
Answers
The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, commonly known as the Brady Act, requires federally licensed firearms dealers to perform background checks on prospective firearms purchasers to ensure that the firearm transfer would not violate federal, state, or local law.
The Brady Act, passed in 1993, established the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) as a tool for conducting background checks on individuals seeking to purchase firearms from licensed dealers. The purpose of the background checks is to prevent firearms from being obtained by individuals who are prohibited by law from possessing them, such as convicted felons, domestic violence offenders, individuals with certain mental health conditions, and others.
By requiring background checks, the Brady Act aims to enhance public safety and prevent firearms from falling into the wrong hands. The background check process helps identify individuals who may pose a risk and prohibits them from acquiring firearms legally.
To know more about firearms here
https://brainly.com/question/28902512
#SPJ11
Look at the graphic of the three branches of government. Explain to a sixth grade student what these three branches did for the country at the time of the Constitutional Convention. Your explanation should take no more than 50-75 words.
Answers
Answer:
During The Constitutional Convention, James Madison suggested to have three branches. The legislative branch, the Congress, would make laws. The executive branch would carry out the laws. A judicial branch would settle legal arguments. This set up a system of checks and balances where all three branches had a distribution of power so that nothing could become more powerful than them. They were under the Virginia Plan, which provided for a national government for them.
Explanation:
Which of the following are credited for greatly influencing the transformation of the U.S. criminal justice system over the last
century?
Answers
How negative spactator may impact the game
Answers
Negative spectator may impact the game by being rude and violent towards players.
The different types of spectator aggression include verbal abuse, gesturing, physical violence, property damage, littering, and "warming up" or rushing the field. Public intoxication, student gatherings, ticket touting, and other factors can all contribute to spectator violence. At sporting events, spectators can also have a negative impact because they can be rude and abusive to athletes, which demotivates them or causes them to lose focus, which affects their performance.
The four consequences of bad behavior spectator are disorientation with regard to values. Inefficiency. high homicide rate. Slow development and low investment.
Learn more about Negative spectator at:
brainly.com/question/30816169
#SPJ4
Although rare, researchers have found neighborhoods where levels of
collective efficacy are high and so is crime.
True
O False
Criminal justice
Answers
the answer is true.......
What type of contract did Godfrey form when he put the advert for his lost phone up, and can the young boy enforce this contract against him?
Answers
The advert for Godfrey's lost phone is not a contract but an invitation to treat.
What is a contract?A contract is an agreement between different parties that is enforceable by law.
For a contract to exist, these elements are required:
Mutual assentValid offer and acceptanceAdequate considerationCapacityLegality.Thus, the young boy cannot enforce the contract against Godfrey as none was made between him and Godfrey.
Learn more about the requirements for a contract at https://brainly.com/question/15058983
#SPJ1
Among the factors that influence delinquency rate trends, which is false?
a. The general crime rate follows the proportion of young males in the population.
b. As the number of gun-carrying (toting seems too informal) students increases, so does the seriousness of violent delinquency.
c. As the level of social problems increases, such as unwed mothers and racial conflict, so do delinquency rates.
d. There is strong association between delinquency rates and the immigrant
population.
Answers
The false statement among the given options is there is a strong association between delinquency rates and the immigrant population.
The option (D) is correct.
Research has shown that there is generally no strong association between delinquency rates and the immigrant population. Studies have consistently found that immigrants, including first-generation immigrants and their children, tend to have lower rates of crime and delinquency compared to the native-born population.
This phenomenon is often referred to as the "immigrant paradox." While there may be specific cases or contexts where certain immigrant groups exhibit higher delinquency rates, as a general trend, there are areas of strength no between misconduct rates and the immigrant populace.
Learn more about delinquency:
https://brainly.com/question/14502794
#SPJ4
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ILL GIVE U BRAINLIEST AND 30 points!!! asap pls
Answers
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Hope this helped!
Identify 10 religions in the world and speculate a rule peculiar to each
Answers
Answer:
Christian
Dydyducruehfydfdrr