Can someone help me with this Jefferson Era Assignment Crossword puzzle?

Im not very good at crosswords, and I know there are people who are and who enjoy doing crossword puzzles, so if anyone could please help.


Teachers instructions: Complete the crossword puzzle by spelling out the term defined by each clue. Be sure to spell the

word correctly in each instance, or it will be marked incorrect!


Across

4. Withdraw from a group

6. Warship

9. The right to sail the seas and not take sides

10. Prohibits trade with another country

11. Armed private ship

Down

1. Protection money

2. Taxes on foreign imported goods

3. The right of the Supreme Court to rule on acts by

other branches of government

5. French term that means "let people

do as they choose"

7. The practice of forcing people

into service

8. Pride in one’s country

A person's perspectives are the result of a complex interplay between their individual characteristics and the environmental factors that shape their experiences and beliefs.

A person's perspectives are shaped by a complex interplay of various factors, including:

Culture and upbringing: A person's cultural background and upbringing can shape their worldview and values.

Education and experiences: Education and personal experiences can influence a person's perspectives, by exposing them to different ideas and ways of thinking.

Personality and temperament: A person's personality traits and temperament can also affect their perspectives, such as their tendency towards optimism or pessimism.

Beliefs and values: A person's beliefs and values, including religious, moral, and ethical values, can significantly shape their perspectives.

Social and political context: The social and political context in which a person lives can also influence their perspectives, including factors such as social norms, political ideologies, and historical events.

Overall, a person's perspectives are the result of a complex interplay between their individual characteristics and the environmental factors that shape their experiences and beliefs.

learn more about person's perspectives: https://brainly.com/question/13107415

#SPJ1

Answer:

Option: B) Liberty party

Explanation:

Liberty Party was a political party created in 1840 by abolitionists who believed in antislavery. Liberty Party supports antislavery issue by pressuring legislators, put stop in extending slavery beyond the states, and destroy both the slave trade. Some of the famous people under the Liberty Party were William Lloyd Garrison, James G. Birney, and Henry Clay.

Answer: in my opinion United States government today is just and legimate.

After General Stonewall Jackson's death, James Longstreet took over his position in the Confederate army.

So, the correct answer is D.

Thomas J. "Stonewall" Jackson was a Confederate general during the American Civil War who gained fame for his tactical brilliance and tenacity on the battlefield. Jackson was responsible for some of the Confederacy's most important victories, including the First Battle of Bull Run and the Battle of Chancellorsville.

After he was shot by friendly fire at the Battle of Chancellorsville, Stonewall Jackson died on May 10, 1863. His death was a significant loss for the Confederacy. James Longstreet, one of Robert E. Lee's most trusted generals, took over command of his corps after his death.

Therefore, the correct answer on this question is D. James Longstreet.

Learn more about Civil War at https://brainly.com/question/1020924

#SPJ11

The colonist development of the developed the enlightened are the government are the colonial in the principles are the prominent philosophers. There was on the believed of the liberty.

What is government?

The term “government” refers to the legal authority of the country. The government manages to control, command, and handle the country. The government's first priority is to ensure citizens are safe in the country.

When notable intellectuals (such as Thomas Paine) authored articles and pamphlets encouraging colonists to accept Enlightenment values in justice, freedom, and liberty, it protested how early the colonists had formed enlightened governance concepts.

As a result, the colonist development of the developed the enlightened are the believed to the liberty and freedom.

Learn more about on government, here:

https://brainly.com/question/16940043

#SPJ1

Answer:

"the airstrike on Truk Island") was a massive naval air and surface attack launched on February 16–17, 1944, during World War II by the United States Navy against the Japanese naval and air base at Truk in the Caroline Islands, a pre-war Japanese territory.

Answer:

The most direct effect was to provoke the Puritans' wrath.

Explanation:

Puritans did not approve of theaters and their performances taking place in the city. This is because, they believed that this type of entertainment had elements of the pagan festivals and diverted the thoughts of the people who should have always turned to Christ. The moment the queen created her own theater company, the Puritans were angry. This is because all the practices approved by the queen became legal and nothing could stop them, so they would have to live in a place where the theater was valued and they could not do anything against it.

The most direct effect of the establishment of the Queen's Men were that: C. Puritans were outraged.

American public opinion played a crucial role in the decision to escalate U.S. military involvement in Vietnam as the war progressed and public opinion turned against the conflict, the government felt pressure to change its strategy and take more decisive action.

American public opinion played a significant role in the decision to escalate U.S. military involvement in Vietnam. At the beginning of the Vietnam War, public opinion was largely in favor of U.S. involvement. Many Americans believed that the U.S. had a responsibility to prevent the spread of communism, and they saw Vietnam as a crucial battleground in the fight against communism.

However, as the war dragged on and casualties mounted, public opinion began to shift. Americans became increasingly disillusioned with the war and began to question the U.S. government's justification for continued involvement. The media played a crucial role in shaping public opinion, with graphic images of the war's violence and destruction being broadcast into American homes on a nightly basis.

Protests against the war began to mount, with college students, civil rights activists, and other groups taking to the streets to voice their opposition. As public opinion turned against the war, pressure mounted on the U.S. government to change its strategy. Some politicians began to call for a de-escalation of the conflict, while others advocated for an all-out military effort to win the war.

Ultimately, the U.S. government decided to escalate its military involvement in Vietnam in an effort to turn the tide of the war. This decision was not made in a vacuum, but rather in response to the shifting attitudes and opinions of the American public. The government believed that it needed to demonstrate a firm commitment to winning the war in order to regain the support of the American people.

Ultimately, however, the decision to escalate the war proved to be a costly and controversial one, and it remains one of the most divisive and painful chapters in American history.

Learn more about Vietnam War:

https://brainly.com/question/12918391

#SPJ11

\(\huge{\textbf{\textsf{{\color{pink}{An}}{\blue{sw}}{\pink{er}} {\color{blue}{:}}}}}\)

Negotiation on border should be based in pre-1969 "green line" – the armistice line grown in 1949 at the end of the war that followed israel's declaration of a state – with agreed land swaps to compensate for Jewish settlements in the West Bank that would be incorporated into to Israeli territory.

Answer:

in the past few decades, an apparent international consensus has developed regarding a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. However, in spite of this consensus and the fact that peace talks between Israelis and Palestinians have been ongoing in one way or another for over 17 years, peace has been elusive at best. The frustration and the suffering of the people on both sides of the conflict have led many to believe that the two-state-solution consensus is, in fact, unattainable, and this has fueled the emergence of alternative solutions. On one end of the spectrum, there are those on the Israeli side that advocate the idea of conflict management, instead of conflict resolution. At the other end of the spectrum are those (mostly on the pro-Palestinian side) who champion the proposal of a single, bi-national state. It was in this context that a group of academics from the U.S., Israel, and Palestine, gathered at a conference aptly titled "Pathways to Peace" in March 2008 to explore, discuss, and generate fresh, new ideas to bring forth an academic perspective of peace along with the aim of attaining justice and security for both the peoples of Palestine and Israel. Essays arising from this meeting were written to note down these ideas from some of the most important researchers in this area, such as Professor Herbert Kelman from Harvard University, Professor Naomi Chazan from Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and Dr. Sami Adwan from Bethlehem University, as well as other renowned academics from a diverse variety of scholarly backgrounds. This multidisciplinary perspective presents an academic and holistic method of examining and seeking out the elusive resolution to what is one of the longest conflict of the modern era. This edited volume is a collection of essays based on the papers and keynote presentations that were delivered at this conference in a number of different academic disciplines, including political sciences, economics, psychology, philosophy, and literature. It is unique not only in its inclusion of authors from all sides and different political views but also in how it incorporates the various disciplines and theoretical perspectives in proposing and advocating varied solutions to the conflict. This volume makes a substantial contribution to scholarship on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by its application of academic thinking to the solution for one of the most serious conflicts of our time.

Answer: A

Explanation: We did this in class

Answer:

The first one

Explanation:

Answer:

hes a quite talker

Explanation:

dont be rude

Answer:Since, few conflict are just about ethnicity. They are fueled by other divisions such as:skin color, religious affiliation, regional ties,Socio-economic status. 
2. Geographical proximity of different groups.

3. Outside interference play on the ethnic differences.

4. Prejudice/hatred sets the stage for conflicts.

5. Leaders use ethnic conflict to promote their own objectives.-Leaders count on emotional intensity and loyalty such as in Rwanda that ethnic violence claimed as many as 800,000 lives in 1994. -More than ¾ of Rwanda's Tutsi population were killed. 

Answer:b

Explanation:because they were near each other

As per Nader, a public firm ought to be responsible for showcasing NAFTA. 1. Mexico would encounter more changes because of NAFTA. They would be dependent upon more guideline, their compensation would increment, and they could proceed to work and make a daily existence in Mexico.

President Ronald Reagan of the US gave the main push to the formation of a North American deregulation zone by remembered it for his 1980 official mission.

Presidents George H. W. Shrub of the US, Carlos Salinas de Gortari of Mexico, and Brian Mulroney of Canada consented to compensation examine what might become NAFTA after the Canada-US International alliance was approved in 1988. In December 1992.

Learn more about NAFTA, from :

brainly.com/question/12027606

#SPJ2

Answer: preventive war.

The given statement "Joseph Breen was a movie producer who tried to test the boundaries of censorship in the 1930s"  is False because Joseph Breen was not a movie producer, but rather a significant figure in the field of film censorship in the 1930s.

Breen served as the head of the Production Code Administration (PCA) from 1934 to 1954, overseeing the enforcement of the Motion Picture Production Code, often referred to as the Hays Code. The Hays Code, implemented in 1930, was a set of industry guidelines for self-regulation, aiming to ensure that the content of films was morally acceptable to a broad audience. Breen played a crucial role in upholding the principles of the Hays Code, collaborating with film studios, producers, and directors to review and approve scripts, ensuring they adhered to the Code's standards.

During his tenure, Breen was known for his strict and meticulous approach to censorship, ensuring that films addressed topics like crime, sexuality, and violence in a way that would not offend or corrupt viewers. His influence on the industry was significant, and he had a considerable impact on the content of American films during this era.

In summary, the statement that Joseph Breen was a movie producer who tried to test the boundaries of censorship in the 1930s is false. Instead, Breen was a key figure in film censorship who worked diligently to maintain the moral standards outlined in the Hays Code, shaping the content of American cinema during his time as head of the PCA.

Know more about Production Code Administration (PCA) here:

https://brainly.com/question/29562765

#SPJ11

Answer:

I think it is C.

Explanation:

First of all, I clearly see the map says "Helsinki", which is a city in Finland, so its not A.

It's not B, it doesn't exactly make sense.

C is correct, I see roads and labels so it is probably providing travel directions.

D makes no sense, these maps don't teach you about the area's resources.

Hopes this helps have a good day! :)

The purpose of the map in this electronic tablet is to provide travel directions to a location.

A map is a representation of the characteristics of an area. A map serves by:

In this question the map in the device is showing the distance that has to covered from a place that is called Helsinki.

Therefore we conclude on option C that it is used to provide travel directions.

Read more on https://brainly.com/question/11777705?referrer=searchResults

A biographer of Borglum might have difficulty describing what his subject was doing before 1901 because he led a life of a vagabond and never settled

He was an American sculptor that was known for his monumental busts of US presidents carved in the mountainside of Mount Rushmore.

However, a biographer of Borglum might have difficulty describing what his subject was doing before 1901 because he led a life of a vagabond and never settled.

Read more about Borglum

brainly.com/question/19704979

#SPJ1

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The purpose of the Union blockade during the American Civil War was to block the entry of manufactured goods and overseas cotton sales from the Confederacy. The Union hoped that by cutting off the Confederacy's ability to sell its cotton to European markets, it could weaken the Southern economy and force the Confederacy to surrender. The blockade was also intended to prevent the Confederacy from receiving supplies and arms from Europe that could be used against the Union.

Answer:

C. Essays exposed the evils of slavery to a much wider audience.

A. Former slaves wrote books describing personal experiences.

Explanation:

Answer:

Pachacuti Inca Yupanqui (often simply Pachacuti or Pachacutec) was the 9th Inca ruler (r. 1438 - 1471 CE) who founded their empire with conquests in the Cuzco Valley and beyond. Pachacuti is also credited with founding the site of Machu Picchu.

Explanation:

Answer: Yes

Explanation:

Under his leadership Incas conquered Peru and started moving to neighboring lands. He spread the Incan empire and established an Incan system of government. They imposed 1 language-Quechua, and founded schools to learn Incan ways.  He was a powerful and ambitious ruler, who quickly expanded the Inca Empire through conquests and diplomacy.

I hope my answer has helped you

The expanded powers of the national government have both benefits and drawbacks when it comes to policy-making in the United States. On one hand, the increased power of the national government has allowed for a more cohesive and efficient policy-making process, with a greater ability to tackle issues that affect the entire country.

For example, the national government's ability to regulate interstate commerce through the Commerce Clause has allowed for the creation of a unified national market and the promotion of economic growth.On the other hand, the expansion of national power has also led to a reduction in state autonomy and a potential loss of representation for local communities. The Articles of Confederation, for example, explicitly granted states the power to control their own trade and commerce, while the national government was limited in its ability to regulate these areas. The Anti-Federalist paper Brutus 1 argued that the proposed Constitution would threaten this state autonomy and lead to a consolidation of power in the national government. This loss of local control could potentially harm policy-making, as states may have unique needs or perspectives that are not represented at the national level.

Overall, while the expanded powers of the national government have certainly had benefits in terms of policy-making, it is important to recognize the potential drawbacks as well. Balancing the need for national unity with the desire for state autonomy and local representation remains a key challenge in the ongoing evolution of American federalism.
The United States Constitution establishes a federal system of government, in which policy making is shared between national and state governments. Over time, the powers of the national government have increased relative to those of the state governments. The question is whether the expanded powers of the national government benefit or hinder policy making. In this answer, I will present an argument and provide evidence from the Federalist 10 to support my stance.
To know more about American federalism Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28532395

#SPJ11

Answer:

Events happening at the same time might have influenced one another

Explanation:

Citing or analyzing the historical context in isolation without considering other historical events happening during that time, might affect the true analysis or reason for the actual occurrence of such event under consideration.

Hence, in this case, it is always recommended or important to consider the historical context surrounding an event when making a historical interpretation because "events happening at the same time might have influenced one another"

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Events happening at the same time might have influenced one another; correlation or causation.

Answer:

B, Showed a great desire for education as the means of escaping the ignorance of slavery.

During the first half of the nineteenth century, free African-Americans could not, under federal law, obtain public land.

Forcible laborers on farms in the American South and West, the majority of African Americans residing in the United States during the first part of the nineteenth century were slaves. African-Americans who were free in the South remained to exist in the shadow of slavery and were not permitted to move or congregate as freely as those in the North. They also found it more challenging to found and sustain institutions like churches, schools, and fraternal organizations like the Masons.

Some recently freed slaves promptly left the area where they lived, while others worked as wage laborers for their former owners. Most crucially, African Americans had the freedom to decide for themselves where and what kind of employment they would do.

To know more about slavery, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/782305

#SPJ4