Caleb is a forensic entomologist gathering evidence at a crime scene. How can he determine the stage the maggot larva has reached?
Caleb is a forensic entomologist gathering evidence at a crime scene. From the victim's mouth, he retrieves maggots that are in the ___________
which is the stage maggots reach directly after hatching. He can determine the stage of the maggot larva based on the__________
and the_____________
of the larva
Answers
To determine the stage of the maggot larva, Caleb can observe the size, shape, and color of the larvae, as well as any distinctive physical features such as bristles or spines.
Maggots go through three developmental instars, or stages, and each one is distinguished by certain physical alterations. For instance, the maggot is generally tiny and has a characteristic head shape in the first instar. The maggot enlarges and may develop spines or other physical characteristics in its second instar.
The maggot finally achieves its largest size and may change color or form from earlier stages in the third instar. Caleb can detect the stage of development by looking at the physical features of the maggots, and he may then utilize this knowledge to calculate when the victim died.
Learn more about entomologists here:
https://brainly.com/question/7180234
#SPJ12
Related Questions
While testifying on the stand in his breach of contract suit, Constantine admitted that he sold land to Felipe. This is known as a(n) _______.
Answers
While testifying on the stand in his breach of contract suit, Constantine admitted that he sold land to Felipe. This is known as admission.
An admission is a statement made by a party to a lawsuit, which is against their own interest, and can be used as evidence against them in court. In this case, Constantine's admission that he sold land to Felipe may be used as evidence that he breached a contract, if one existed between the two parties, and that Felipe is entitled to damages as a result. Admissions can be made verbally, in writing, or even implied through the actions of a party. They are a powerful tool in litigation and can often be the deciding factor in a case. It is important for parties to be careful in what they say or do, as any admission made can have significant consequences in court.
Know more about Constantine here:
https://brainly.com/question/2656862
#SPJ11
These are otherwise criminal acts that society approves and encourages under the circumstances.
a) excuses
b) defenses
c) justifications
d) necessities
Answers
Justifications are otherwise criminal acts that society approves and encourages under the circumstances. In the legal context, justifications refer to situations where an individual's actions, which would typically be considered criminal, are deemed lawful and acceptable due to specific circumstances.
These circumstances justify the behavior and provide a legal defense against criminal liability. Justifications are different from excuses or defenses. Excuses acknowledge that the individual committed the act but argues that they should not be held responsible due to a lack of intent or capacity. Defenses, on the other hand, admit that the act was committed intentionally but argue that it should not be considered criminal because of specific legal requirements or principles.
Justifications, such as self-defense or defense of others, allow individuals to use reasonable force to protect themselves or others from imminent harm. Necessity is another justification where an individual commits a criminal act to prevent a greater harm or danger.
To learn more about Justifications, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/23939271
#SPJ11
Justifications are otherwise criminal acts that society approves and encourages under the circumstances. In the legal context, justifications refer to situations where an individual's actions, which would typically be considered criminal, are deemed lawful and acceptable due to specific circumstances.
These circumstances justify the behavior and provide a legal defense against criminal liability. Justifications are different from excuses or defenses. Excuses acknowledge that the individual committed the act but argues that they should not be held responsible due to a lack of intent or capacity. Defenses, on the other hand, admit that the act was committed intentionally but argue that it should not be considered criminal because of specific legal requirements or principles.
Justifications, such as self-defense or defense of others, allow individuals to use reasonable force to protect themselves or others from imminent harm. Necessity is another justification where an individual commits a criminal act to prevent a greater harm or danger.
To learn more about Justifications, click here:
brainly.com/question/23939271
#SPJ11
1. are the extracts from the new Civil Code of the Philippines Book IV. A) obligations and contracts B) RA 1157 C) both D) none 2. are the kinds of breach of obligation. A) Voluntary \& involuntary B) performance \& execution C) both D) none 3. are the modes of breach of obligation. A) fraud B) negligence C) delay D) all E) none 4. The two kinds of fraud, namely the fraud in performance and fraud in A) Rescission B) execution C) performance D) none E) all 5. is one of the classification of obligations. A) pure B) conditional C) both D) none 6. L_are the elements of obligation. A) Active subject B) passive subject C) both D) none 7. The duties of an obligator is/are to A) Deliver B) preserve c) both the fruit or the results. D) none E ) all 8. The remedies of creditor in case of breach include action for following A) Performance B) damage C) rescission D) all E) none 9. ___ is/are the kinds of solidary obligations. A) Legal B) conventional C) real D) none E) all 10. is/are the requisites of period in an obligation. A) Future B) certain C) possible D) none E) all 11. No reformation of contract in the following case/cases. 4) Simple donation B) wills C) when real agreement is void D ) all E ) none 12. is/are the case/cases of an in existent contract. A) Contrary to law B) fictitious C) prohibited by law D) all E) none 13. In the performance or will form part as an extinguishment of an obligation. A) Non-payment B) payment C) both D) none 14. The essential elements of contract include (Article 1318). A) consent B) object C) cause of the obligation D) all E) none
Answers
1. Obligations and contracts, 2. Both, 3. All, 4. performance, 5. Both, 6. Both, 7. Both the fruit and the results, 8. All, 9. All, 10. All, 11. All, 12. All, 13. Both, 14. All
The extracts are from Book IV of the Civil Code of the Philippines, which specifically deals with obligations and contracts. There are two kinds of breach of obligation: voluntary and involuntary, as well as breach through non-performance and breach through defective performance. The modes of breach of obligation include fraud, negligence, and delay. All three options are applicable.
The two kinds of fraud mentioned are fraud in performance and fraud in the execution or performance of the obligation. Obligations can be classified as pure obligations or conditional obligations. The elements of obligation include the active subject (obligee) and the passive subject (obligor). Both options are correct.
The duties of an obligor include the delivery of the object of the obligation and the preservation of its fruits or results. The creditor has various remedies in case of a breach, including the right to demand performance, claim damages, or seek rescission. Solidary obligations can be legal, conventional, or real.
The requisites of the period in an obligation are that it must be future, certain, and possible. Reformation of a contract is not applicable in the case of simple donation, wills, or when the real agreement is void. An inexistent contract can occur when it is contrary to law, fictitious, or prohibited by law.
Both non-payment and payment form part of the performance and can lead to the extinguishment of the obligation. The essential elements of a contract include consent, object, and cause of the obligation.
Learn more about contracts, here:
https://brainly.com/question/32149036
#SPJ4
Pls only answer if you feel like u know the answer
Answers
Answer:
members of the House are elected every two years, whereas senators are elected for six-year terms. ... Senators are at least thirty years old and citizens for nine years.
Another difference is who they represent. Senators represent their entire states, but members of the House represent individual districts
Explanation:
The House and Senate are equal partners in the legislative process—legislation cannot be enacted without the consent of both chambers. However, the Constitution grants each chamber some unique powers. The Senate ratifies treaties and approves presidential appointments while the House initiates revenue-raising bills.
Which of the following is an example of velocity? *
90 km/hr west
20 mph
north by northwest
none of the above
Answers
Answer:
90 km an hour west
Explanation:
Velocity is the speed and rate of anything in a given direction or measurement
What is the differences between law and ethic and law and religion?
Answers
— Ethics are a set of moral values an individual establishes for one's self and your own personal behavior. Laws are structured rules utilized to govern all of society. Differences between right and wrong or good and bad behavior. Laws are the rules a country or community mandates its citizens follow in order to regulate society. Religion is a structure of faith and worship. It's a belief system based on faith in a supernatural power.
pa brainlest po:) ThankYou
Hope it helps in you, GOODLUCK!
Do defense teams have the ability to mount a defense against evidence? What affects their ability?
Answers
Answer:
Here's a sample answer:)
No, defense teams do not have the ability to defend against evidence. Usually, this is because there is not enough money or resources for them to use. This can also be affected by the type and/or amount of evidence presented. If there is undeniable evidence or an overwhelming amount of evidence it is very difficult to defend against such. Typically in this situation,the legal strategy to undermine the prosecution’s case is used.
What do election mean?
Answers
In our state's prisons testing for prohibited substances doesn't include alcohol. Cite ONLY the correct Code with your T or F.
Answers
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Since 2018, alcohol has been removed from the list of prohibited substances and is therefore not analyzed in state prisons in most states. However, in cases of driving vehicles in which the driver is under the effect of alcohol, this substance is considered if a prohibited substance test is carried out, as driving under the influence of alcohol is prohibited throughout the country.
The ________ has become the lead agency when it comes to white-collar crime, particularly in response to recent financial scandals. a. FBI b. CIA c. FDA d. DEA
Answers
The correct answer is the FBI. Over the past decade, there have been numerous high-profile white-collar crime cases, such as the Enron scandal and the Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme.
As a result, the FBI has increasingly taken on the role of investigating and prosecuting these types of crimes. The agency has established dedicated units, such as the Financial Crimes Section, to investigate complex financial fraud cases. The FBI also works closely with other agencies, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice, to bring white-collar criminals to justice. In recent years, the FBI has been involved in several high-profile cases, including the arrest of several FIFA officials on corruption charges and the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
To know more about FBI visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30391123
#SPJ11
Hi what Erica can run 16 1 6 of a kilometer in a minute. Her school is 34 3 4 of a kilometer away from her home. At this speed, how long would it take Erica to run home from school?
Answers
Answer:
the time required is 4.5 mins
Explanation:
The computation of the time that required to run home from school is shown below:
Given that as per the question
1 ÷ 6 km = 1 min
So,
1 km = 1 × 6
i.e.
1 km = 6 mins
Now to run 3 ÷ 4 km, the time required is
As we know
1 km = 6 mins
So,
3 ÷ 4 km = 6 × 3 ÷ 4
3 ÷4 km = 4.5 mins
Hence, the time required is 4.5 mins
ads for explosives, obscene materials and murder for hire are not protected speech because they promote illegal activity. group of answer choices true false
Answers
Yes, it is True that ads for explosives, obscene materials and murder for hire are not protected speech because they promote illegal activity.
What are Illegal Activities?
Illegal Activities refers to any of the following illegal activities or activities carried out for illegal purposes: money laundering, financing of terrorism, organized crime, tax evasion, tax fraud, fraud, corruption, coercion, collusion, obstruction, and any illegal activity that may harm the financial interests of the European Union (EU) in accordance with applicable laws.
Therefore, ads for explosives, obscene materials and murder for hire are not protected speech as they promote illegal activity.
To know more about Illegal Activities, click on the link given below:
https://brainly.com/question/29243063
#SPJ4
which statement concerning impeachment by evidence of bias is true?
- A party is not permitted to show that a witness's bias is justified.
- A party may introduce extrinsic evidence of a witness's bias prior to the witness's testimony.
Answers
To provide an accurate answer, I need to clarify that the concept of impeachment by evidence of bias can have different interpretations depending on the context.
It is important to specify the context or framework in which the term "impeachment by evidence of bias" is being used.
In a legal or political context, where impeachment refers to the removal of a public official from office, evidence of bias may be one of the grounds for impeachment.
However, the specific rules and procedures for impeachment vary across jurisdictions and governing bodies, such as different countries or legislative bodies within a country.
In general, a true statement concerning impeachment by evidence of bias could be:
"Impeachment proceedings may consider evidence of bias as a potential ground for removing a public official from office, depending on the applicable rules and procedures governing the impeachment process."
It is worth noting that the specifics of how bias is defined and evaluated, and how it influences the impeachment process, can differ depending on the legal framework and context in which it is being applied.
To know more about impeachment refer here
https://brainly.com/question/1411922#
#SPJ11
Why has the Texas Ethics Commission (TEC) faced severe criticism over its enforcement of campaign laws?
Answers
The Texas Ethics Commission (TEC) has faced severe criticism over its enforcement of campaign laws due to several reasons.
One of the primary concerns raised by critics is the perceived lack of effectiveness and efficiency in the TEC's enforcement actions. Critics argue that the TEC has failed to adequately investigate and penalize violations of campaign laws, leading to a sense of impunity among those who may be engaging in questionable campaign practices. The commission has been criticized for being slow in processing complaints and for its limited resources, which may hinder its ability to thoroughly investigate and take appropriate actions.
Another point of criticism is the perception of political influence or bias within the TEC. Some argue that the commission is susceptible to political pressures or that its members may have affiliations or loyalties that compromise their objectivity. This raises concerns about the impartiality and fairness of the enforcement process, undermining public trust in the TEC's ability to regulate campaign finance and ethics.
Furthermore, there have been criticisms regarding the transparency and accountability of the TEC's actions. Critics claim that the commission's decision-making processes lack transparency, making it difficult for the public to understand the rationale behind its enforcement actions. Additionally, concerns have been raised about the perceived leniency of penalties imposed by the TEC, with critics arguing that they may not serve as sufficient deterrents for potential violators.
The complexity and ambiguity of campaign finance laws in Texas have also contributed to the criticism faced by the TEC. Some argue that the laws themselves are convoluted and open to interpretation, creating challenges for consistent enforcement. The lack of clear guidance and the complexity of reporting requirements can create confusion among candidates, political committees, and donors, leading to unintentional violations that are then subject to TEC scrutiny.
Overall, the severe criticism faced by the Texas Ethics Commission over its enforcement of campaign laws stems from concerns regarding its effectiveness, perceived political influence or bias, transparency, and the complexity of campaign finance laws. Addressing these concerns and ensuring a more robust and fair enforcement process will be essential for rebuilding public trust in the TEC's ability to uphold ethical standards and enforce campaign finance regulations effectively.
Learn more about Texas Ethics Commission here
https://brainly.com/question/14318950
#SPJ11
The Jordan Keys law firm represented the Greater Southeast Community Hospital of Washington, D.C., in a medical malpractice suit against the hospital. The hospital was self-insured for the first $1,000,000 of liability and the St. Paul Insurance Co. provided excess coverage up to $4,000,000. The law firm was owed $67,000 for its work on the malpractice suit when the hospital went into bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court ordered the law firm to release its files on the case to St. Paul to defend under the excess coverage insurance, and the Jordan Keys firm sued St. Paul for its legal fees of $67,000 expended prior to the bankruptcy under an “implied-in-fact contract” because the insurance company would have the benefit of all of its work. Decide. [Jordan Keys v. St. Paul Fire, 870 A.2d 58 (D.C.)] what is the answer?
Answers
The court decided in favor of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.
What led the court to this decision to decide in favor of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company?The court found that there was no implied-in-fact contract between Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.
The court found that the hospital and Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP had an express contract requiring the hospital to pay for legal work rendered by Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP. The court found that an implied contract cannot stand in the face of an express one.
Read more about court case here;
https://brainly.com/question/30552468
#SPJ1
What was the difference between the murders of Andrew Goodman/Michael Schwerner and Emmet Till?
Answers
Answer:
Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner (along with James Chaney) were activist who were killed by the Ku Klux Klan after talking with members of a black church that had been burned down. Emmet Till was an African American male who was killed by Mose Wright and his half-brother J.W. Milam because he had allegedly been flirting with his wife.
Explanation:
Economists argue that the best way to protect national security and provide for national defense is through _________.
complete embargo
imposition of sanctions
the implementation of isolationism
direct government subsidies
Answers
Economists argue that the best way to protect national security and provide for national defense is through direct government subsidies.
Direct government subsidies may be one approach to support national security and defense, but they are not the only one.
Other approaches might include investing in research and development of new technologies, supporting education and training programs to develop the skills needed by the defense industry, providing tax incentives to encourage private investment in national security-related industries, and engaging in international collaborations to share resources and expertise.
Some economists may argue that direct government subsidies are appropriate in certain circumstances, such as when a particular industry is critical to national security and is struggling to compete with foreign competitors.
In these cases, government subsidies may be necessary to ensure that the industry remains viable and can continue to provide the necessary goods and services to support national security.
However, other economists may argue that government subsidies can distort markets, encourage inefficiency, and create a dependence on government support that ultimately undermines national security.
They may argue that a better approach is to create a regulatory environment that encourages private investment and innovation, which can lead to the development of new technologies and capabilities that are essential for national security.
To learn more about subsidies, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/30722203
#SPJ11
URGENT PLS HELP
As you’re driving with your family on your annual road trip, you see a car stopped on the shoulder of the interstate. There are two police cars behind that car, with their lights flashing. About ten miles down the road, you then see another police car sitting alone in the median between both major lanes of the interstate. You notice that your dad, who is driving, begins to slow down quite substantially. What is MOST LIKELY the reason your dad began to slow down the car?
A.
He is following the law that states drivers must slow down when an officer is behind them.
B.
He is trying to see whether the police car belongs to a local police officer or a state trooper.
C.
He is being careful after being deterred when he previously saw the other car being pulled over earlier.
D.
He is avoiding having the police offer issue a warrant for his arrest.
Answers
More than likely
Hope it helps
is a lab worker who analyzes scientific evidence considered "line" or "staff"?
Answers
Answer:
Staff
Explanation: If the member in question is working in the lab, then that means he is part of the Staff Group.
What is the theme of this book? According to that theme, what are the differences between the individual rights perspective and the public order perspective?
Answers
The theme of the book, "Criminal Justice" is:
Individual Rights vs. Public Order.The difference between the individual rights perspective and the public order perspective is this:
The criminal justice system helps in the maintenance of individual rights while the public order helps to maintain the rights of the general society.What is a theme?A theme refers to the central message that a text has for its readers. The theme of the text on Criminal Justice is about the interplay between Individual rights and public order.
Whereas the rights of individuals are safeguarded through the criminal justice system, public order helps to ensure that the rights of people in a society are maintained.
Learn more about criminal justice here:
https://brainly.com/question/27846688
#SPJ1
Provide at least two of the arguments in favor of capital punishment and two of the arguments againat capital punishment. Which argument do you think is most persuasive and why?
Answers
Capital punishment has long sparked heated debate about its morality as well as its impact on criminal behaviour. Contemporary arguments for and against capital punishment can be divided into three categories: moral, utilitarian, and practical.
Supporters of the death penalty believe that those who commit murder have forfeited their right to life because they have taken the life of another. Furthermore, they believe that capital punishment is a just form of retribution.
In contrast, opponents of capital punishment argue, citing Cesare Beccaria's writings that capital punishment is counterproductive in terms of the moral message it conveys because it legitimizes the very behaviour that the law seeks to repress—killing.
To know more about Capital punishment here
https://brainly.com/question/28180014
#SPJ1
Which of the following is true about super pacs ? Super PACs contribute directly to candidates’ campaigns.
Super PACs have more government restrictions.
Super PACs enable unlimited donations.
Super PACs support candidates’ campaigns.
Super PACs run political campaigns.
Answers
The statement that is true about super pacs is that Super PACs support candidates’ campaigns.
What distinguishes a super PAC from a PAC?In order to finance independent expenditures and other independent political action, super PACs (independent expenditure only political committees) are groups that may accept an unlimited amount of contributions from people, businesses, labor organizations, and other PACs.
Super PACs are political committees with the sole aim of supporting independent expenditures and other independent political activity. They may accept an unlimited amount of money from people, businesses, labor organizations, and other political action committees.
Therefore, option C is correct.
Learn more about campaigns at:
https://brainly.com/question/29904104
#SPJ1
Yellow diamond shape sign with a black curved arrow on means what?
Answers
Answer: to slow down or upcoming hazard
Explanation:
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Answers
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
Which of the following may NOT be cited as a primary source of tax law? US District court decision. Temporary Treasury Regulation. Revenue Ruling. Technical advice memorandum. Tax Treaty with Canada. Question 5 Which of the following taxes is NOT paid by wage eamers? FICA tax FUTA Social Security tax Medicare tax Income tax
Answers
A US District Court decision may NOT be cited as a primary source of tax law. A US District Court decision is not a primary source of tax law. Question 5: FUTA is the tax that is NOT paid by wage earners.
A primary source of tax law is a statute or regulation that contains the law on a specific topic. US District Court decisions are secondary sources that interpret primary sources such as statutes and regulations. Temporary Treasury Regulation, Revenue Ruling, Technical Advice Memorandum, and Tax Treaty with Canada can be cited as primary sources of tax law.
These are regulations and official interpretations of the law that are published by the government and carry the force of law. The Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) is a tax imposed on employers that funds state and federal unemployment insurance programs. Wage earners do not pay this tax. FICA tax, Social Security tax, Medicare tax, and Income tax are taxes that are paid by wage earners.
You can learn more about US District Court at: brainly.com/question/29887517
#SPJ11
Which of the following means of dissent is against the law?
A.
threatening the life of a leader
B.
writing to a government representative
C.
participating in a peaceful protest
D.
signing a petition for change
Answers
A) threatening the life of a leader
To write to a government representative is encouraged if the matter is of importance. This is done by those who are trying to argue a point, for example people protesting a new law or company. This is perfectly legal.
The right to peaceful assembly or protests is protected under the First Amendment. This is legal.
Signing a petition is also perfectly legal, as no physical harm is involved to another person.
I hope this helps! :)
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Threatening the life of a leader is illegal
an opinion written by a supreme court justice who is in the minority that presents the logic and thinking of the justices who opposed the majority opinion is a
Answers
An opinion written by a supreme court justice who is in the minority that presents the logic and thinking of the justices who opposed the majority opinion is a dissenting opinion.
In a Supreme Court case, when the justices reach a decision, it is common for there to be both a majority opinion and one or more dissenting opinions. The dissenting opinion presents the opposing viewpoints, reasoning, and legal arguments of the justices who did not agree with the majority decision. It allows the dissenting justices to explain their disagreement with the majority's legal analysis and rationale. Dissenting opinions provide important insights into alternative interpretations of the law and can shape future legal discussions and potential changes in the law.
To know more about dissenting opinions, click here: brainly.com/question/11651416
#SPJ11
Should a psychologist be allowed to give an expert opinion on sanity? Why or why not?
Answers
Answer:
yes they should
Explanation:
a psychologist should be able to give an expert opinion on sanity because they study the mind or mental states. This means that they know what is takes to be insane or sane.
one important implied power of the president is executive privilege, which refers to the president’s ability to ________.
Answers
Executive privilege refers to the President's ability to withhold certain information from the public or other branches of government, such as Congress or the judiciary, in order to protect the confidentiality of internal executive branch deliberations or to preserve the separation of powers.
The specific scope and limits of executive privilege have been the subject of ongoing debate and interpretation throughout U.S. history. While the exact extent of executive privilege is not clearly defined, it generally allows the president to maintain the confidentiality of discussions, documents, and communications within the executive branch. It is an implied power derived from the constitutional principle of separation of powers, and although not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, it has been recognized and upheld by the courts.
There are several reasons why a President may invoke executive privilege. These include protecting national security, preserving the candid advice and decision-making processes of the presidency, and maintaining the effectiveness of the executive branch. By having the ability to withhold certain information, the president can ensure that advisors and officials can speak freely and provide honest advice without fear of public disclosure.
Executive privilege can be asserted in various contexts, such as during congressional investigations, court proceedings, or Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. However, it is important to note that executive privilege is not an absolute power, and it can be limited or overridden in certain circumstances. The courts have recognized that executive privilege must be balanced against other important interests, such as the need for transparency, accountability, and the administration of justice.
In summary, executive privilege grants the president the ability to keep certain information confidential and shield internal executive branch discussions from public disclosure, thereby protecting the confidentiality of executive decision-making and preserving the separation of powers.
To learn more about Executive privilege, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29553014
#SPJ11
The United States is on par with Russia in having more persons per capita in prison. Is that a sign that the United States is a nation that enforces its laws, or is it an
indication that something is inherently wrong with its criminal justice system? Please explain and then respond to a
Answers
According to the criminal justice system, the United States is the one that enforces the laws, and the poor are disproportionately represented in the prison population.
What is criminal?
The person who committed a crime is referred to as a "criminal." A individual is legitimately arrested if they are the indifferent perpetrator of the crime. Lawbreakers are classified into four types: persistent, moralistic, juridical, and organized. The perpetrator must be punished by the court.
According to the criminal justice, the United States is the one that writes the laws, and the crimes police are overburdened. A substantial proportion of the poor end up in prison.
Hence, the significance was the criminal aforementioned.
Learn more about on criminal, here:
https://brainly.com/question/23059652
#SPJ1