Business activities are at times governed by criminal law
O True
O False
Answer: False
Explanation: Criminal law is relevant to business because crime presents real threats. When crimes are committed, people are injured. Criminal behavior is punishable by law. Risks to business posed by crime arise from the losses suffered from the criminal activities of those on the outside of the business organization, as well as those on the inside. Corporations themselves can be liable for crime when an employee working within the scope of employment commits crime that benefits the corporation, or when the corporation itself commits crime.
The American Bar Association recommends that all felony cases reach disposition within
a. one year of filing.
b. six months of arrest.
c. six months of filing.
d. one year of arrest.
The American Bar Association recommends that all felony cases reach disposition within one year of filing. The American Bar Association's Standards for Criminal Justice establishes that cases that go on for a long time raise issues for all the parties involved.
The accused, victims, witnesses, and their families, as well as society as a whole, may all be affected by the delay of justice. The Standards seek to decrease delays in criminal trials in order to increase the public's trust in the criminal justice system. The Standards aim to ensure that, while due process rights are upheld, criminal cases are dealt with promptly and efficiently by the system. The criminal justice system must work to guarantee that justice is done quickly, efficiently, and fairly, not only for the accused but also for the victim and society. Defendants have the right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. When the criminal justice system is delayed, it harms the system's reputation, creates anxiety, and raises doubts about the legitimacy of the proceedings.
to know about American Bar Association visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28149117
#SPJ11
Fatima Omar has just graduated from the university and she is looking for a job. Fatima’s family has good relations with a local Law Office which they used to consult it from time to time on matters that concern the family. Last week Fatima wrote to the Law Office stating the following: "I am really upset about what my uncle recently did. He had, since I was young, promised me that he would give me his Mercedes when he got a new car. He got a new car and instead of giving his old car to me, he gave it to his son who he just made up with after years of hating each other. I feel that the car should be mine. Can I do anything to get the car?" What advise the Law office should give to Fatima?
The Law Office should advise Fatima that unfortunately, she may not have a legal claim to the car. While her uncle may have promised her the car, promises are not necessarily legally binding unless they are in the form of a contract or other legally enforceable agreement.
Additionally, even if there was some sort of agreement between Fatima and her uncle, he still has the right to change his mind and give the car to someone else. The Law Office should explain that inheritance and gift laws generally do not favor one person over another based on promises or verbal agreements.
However, if Fatima believes that her uncle's actions were motivated by discrimination or some other unlawful factor, then she may have legal grounds for a claim. In general, the Law Office should advise Fatima to discuss the situation with her uncle and try to come to a peaceful resolution.
To know more about verbal agreements visit:
https://brainly.com/question/26175614
#SPJ11
The President nominates a judge to a federal court but the Senate does not confirm (approve) the appointment. This act serves as a check on which TWO branches of government? (CHOOSE TWO)
Answer:
Executive and Legislative (or vise versa)
Explanation:
Executive is the President. Executive enforces the laws. The President also appoints judges.
The Legislative such as The Senate and House of Representatives make the laws.
Therefore, This would be a check on these two branches of Government.
500- word daily activity report as a security guard for one shift at a location of your choosing
Basic Daily Activity Reports should include the officers' time on/off site, shift change information (if applicable), and a record of all activity throughout the shift, including routine patrols and any unusual activity.
These are the elements that must be included in every daily activity report. The three (3) most important details are:
1) The officer's shift;
2) any special instructions received from the client or a supervisor (these instructions should also be added to the Pass On Log); and
3) an inventory of the items received by the officer and their condition.
A DAR is a record of the activities and events that occur throughout the day. Each employee keeps track of his or her start and end shift times, as well as daily activities. Although the daily activity report includes incident reports, it is not the same as an incident report. The DAR documents the occurrence of a specific event or incident, whereas an incident report goes into greater detail. Along with their daily activity report, the officer, hospitality employee, or field employee typically submits a separate incident report.
Learn more about daily activity report ,
https://brainly.com/question/30902196
#SPJ4
classify the definition or example with the appropriate gas law.
"The pressure of a gas is inversely proportional to its volume at constant temperature." - Boyle's Law"
The total pressure exerted by a mixture of gases is equal to the sum of the pressures exerted by each individual gas." - Dalton's Law of Partial Pressures"
The volume of a gas is directly proportional to its temperature at constant pressure." - Charles's Law"
The rate of effusion of a gas is inversely proportional to the square root of its molar mass." - Graham's Law of Effusion"
The pressure of a gas is directly proportional to the number of moles of gas present at constant temperature and volume." - "Avogadro's Law"
Explanation:
This statement describes the relationship between pressure and volume, indicating an inverse proportionality. It corresponds to Boyle's Law.
The statement refers to the total pressure of a mixture of gases and the individual pressures exerted by each gas. It aligns with Dalton's Law of Partial Pressures.
This statement discusses the relationship between volume and temperature, suggesting a direct proportionality. It relates to Charles's Law.
The statement pertains to the rate of effusion of a gas and its molar mass, indicating an inverse proportionality. It corresponds to Graham's Law of Effusion.
This statement refers to the relationship between pressure and the number of moles of gas, indicating a direct proportionality. It aligns with Avogadro's Law.
To know more about Boyle's Law, click here https://brainly.com/question/30367133
#SPJ11
Proponents of the 2019 law that eliminated straight-ticket voting in texas made what argument in support of the law?.
The supporters of the 2019 Texas law that banned straight-ticket voting stated that it would boost voter understanding.
All judicial offices in Texas are currently elected on a partisan basis. For interim court vacancies, the Texas Constitution allows for appointment by the Governor or county leaders and confirmation by the Senate. According to the Texas constitution, district and appellate judges are chosen by public vote. Unless the candidate passes a severe independent campaign criterion, only a judicial candidate who has been proclaimed the victor of a party primary is permitted to compete on the official ballot in the general election.Thus this is what Proponents of the 2019 law that eliminated straight-ticket voting in Texas made argument in support of the law.
Learn more about Texas Law here: https://brainly.com/question/28996037
#SPJ4
if u have 10 cookies then your friend takes 2 what do you have.
Answer:
Hello There!!
Explanation:
The answer is 8 because you had 10 and your friend takes 2 off from the 10.(10-2=8)
hope this helps, have a great day!!
~Pinky~
What do you think the role of the compliance officer was in
securing this corporate integrity agreement?
The role of the compliance officer in securing this corporate integrity agreement was to ensure that the company's operations are conducted in accordance with the law and ethical standards.
In order to secure a corporate integrity agreement, it is important to have a compliance officer to ensure that the company complies with regulations, laws, and ethical standards. The compliance officer is responsible for developing and implementing programs that help identify and prevent any unethical or illegal activities that may occur in the company .A compliance officer works closely with other departments in the company to monitor and identify any potential problems that could arise.
The role of a compliance officer also includes establishing policies and procedures that employees must follow to ensure that the company is following the rules and regulations set forth by the government. The compliance officer also ensures that the company is training its employees to follow these policies and procedures and is monitoring their compliance. In this way, the compliance officer plays a key role in securing a corporate integrity agreement by ensuring that the company is operating in a transparent and ethical manner.
To know more about ethical manner visit:
brainly.com/question/11226538
#SPJ11
4. Escola, a waitress, was injured when a bottle of soda exploded in her hand while she was putting it into the restaurant's cooler. The bottle came from a shipment that had remained under the counter for thirty-six hours after being delivered by the bottling company. The bottler had subjected the bottle to the method of testing for defects commonly used in the industry, and there is no evidence that Escola or anyone else did anything to damage the bottle between its delivery and the explosion. Escola brought an action against the bottler for damages. Since she is unable to show any specific acts of negligence on its part, she seeks to rely on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. Should she be able to recover on this theory? Explain.
Answer:
possibly
Explanation:
We use the term the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur could possibly be relied on because, if the court deemed that there's considerable evidence there was a probability that the bottler was negligent with regard to the safety of the bottle of soda.
However, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur may not be relied on if there's evidence of an absence of negligence by the bottler with regard to the safety of the bottle of soda. In other words, evidence shows that there's a greater probability that the waitress may have mishandled the bottle of soda or was negligent in some way leading her injuries.
6. Wilson places a disability insurance policy for a customer who describes
himself as a carpenter. Some months later, Wilson learns that the man did
not disclose that what he actually does is restore old buildings, which
exposes him to mold, chemicals, and other significant hazards. Wilson
decides to keep this information to himself, knowing that a resulting claim
could result in either a large payout by his company or the voiding of the
policy for concealment. Wilson's action most likely
(Search Chapter 1)
O a. violates state compliance standards.
b. is excusable because the concealment was not his fault.
O c. is excusable because no claim has been filed to date and no harm was
done.
O d. is unethical and unfair to both the insurer Wilson represents and the
policyholder who may have his claim denied.
Answer:
i am sorry i cant give your answer soory far that sorry
Explanation:
sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry for that
sorry if i i know your answer i will tell ok thanks but sorry
Wilson's action of not disclosing what he found out d. is unethical and unfair to both the insurer Wilson represents and the policyholder who may have his claim denied.
Wilson should have disclosed what he found out to the company and the customer himself because this is required by the ethics of the profession.
By not disclosing, he engaged in an unethical action that would result in the man's claim being rejected thereby making this action unfair as well.
In conclusion, option D is correct.
Find out more about insurance at https://brainly.com/question/1373572.
What is the basis of international law?
The NYPD i the bet-trained and mot repected police department in the US, yet it i alo the mot monitored and overeen (ha mot overight) of any department in the US. True or Fale
The city's main local resource to protect against the threat of both domestic and international terrorism in New York City is the NYPD Counterterrorism Bureau (CT).
The CT Bureau evaluates potential terrorist targets, creates cutting-edge, proactive policies and procedures to ward off assaults, trains first responders and specialized units, and builds intelligence capabilities for identifying and preventing terrorist attacks. In order to obtain and share intelligence, the bureau works in concert with various federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies. It also actively participates in the FBI's Joint Terrorist Task Force. The NYPD offers safety and peace of mind to millions of residents, workers, and visitors throughout the five boroughs of New York City, seven days a week, as it is the largest, best-trained, most efficient, and most advanced law enforcement department in the country.
Learn more about terrorist here:
https://brainly.com/question/15203676
#SPJ4
If you're pulled over, after you park your car you should _____.
Place the car in park and turn off the ignition.
Remain still, any suspicious movement from you (even a sudden lowering of one or both shoulders) can prompt a search. Keep your hands in plain sight, preferably on the top of the steering wheel with your fingers visible. Do not get out of the vehicle.
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
problems become recognized in the social domain not because they exist, but because they are identified and defined as problems.
Problems in the social domain become recognized not simply because they objectively exist, but rather because they are identified and defined as problems by individuals, groups, or societies.
The process of problem identification and definition is influenced by various factors, including social norms, values, cultural beliefs, and the perceptions and experiences of different stakeholders.
The recognition of a problem often involves a collective process of understanding and agreement within a given social context. It may involve discussions, debates, research, and the sharing of information and experiences. Different stakeholders may have different perspectives on what constitutes a problem based on their unique positions, interests, and experiences.
Therefore, the recognition of problems in the social domain is a socially constructed process that relies on the collective understanding and agreement of a given society or community. It is important to acknowledge that different perspectives and voices play a role in shaping the identification and definition of problems, as this can impact subsequent efforts to address and solve them.
To read more about Stakeholders click here
https://brainly.com/question/30241824
#SPJ11
The Central Intelligence Agency is responsible for espionage. t/f
Short Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Operation CHAOS or Operation MHCHAOS was a Central Intelligence Agency domestic espionage project targeting the American people from 1967 to 1974, established by President Lyndon B. Johnson and expanded under President Richard Nixon, whose mission was to uncover possible foreign influence on domestic race, anti-war and other protest movements.
Conduct a case study on a location of your choice and identify sources of air or water pollution. Discuss any environmental laws the pollutants or polluters are violating. You will have the option to discuss a relevant factor in your location, such as environmental injustice, epigenetics, or sustainable development. This will be due at the end of Unit 7. Instructions: • Research, find, and describe a case of air or water pollution from a location of your choice from within or outside of the United States. • Discuss the pollutants and how they would be in violation of any current pollution laws or legislation in the area. If here in the United States, how they would be in violation of the Clean Air or Clean Water Acts? Or perhaps the country you have researched has no restrictions on pollution for air and water, discuss how this would further endanger the lives of humans and wildlife in the area. • Choose one (1) of the following special topics below and discuss how the source of pollution is contributing to it. Be sure to support your work with at least two (2) pieces of scientific evidence: o An Environmental Injustice o A threat to Epigenetics by potentially causing inheritable gene defects o Defies sustainable development (contributes to the degraded environment and causes harm to wildlife or the ecosystem) Requirements: • Provide multiple pieces of supporting evidence in your claims, using at least two (2) scholarly resources. • Include all references and citations formatted correctly in APA. • Project should be at least three (3) pages in length, with additional Title and Reference pages. • Use complete sentences and appropriate grammar and spelling.
One example of a case of air pollution is the city of Delhi in India. Delhi has been experiencing severe air pollution issues for many years, particularly during the winter season.
The main sources of air pollution in Delhi include vehicular emissions, industrial pollution, construction activities, and the burning of agricultural residues.
In terms of legislation, India has implemented various laws and regulations to address air pollution. The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 is the primary legislation that empowers the central and state pollution control boards to regulate and control air pollution. The act provides for the prevention, control, and abatement of air pollution through measures such as emission standards, setting up pollution control committees, and conducting regular monitoring.
The pollutants in Delhi's air, such as particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), would be in violation of the air quality standards set by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) in India. These standards aim to protect human health and the environment by defining permissible limits for different pollutants.
If we consider the special topics you mentioned, one aspect related to Delhi's air pollution is environmental injustice. The impact of air pollution is not evenly distributed across the population, with marginalized communities often being disproportionately affected. Factors such as socioeconomic status, access to healthcare, and living conditions can exacerbate the health risks associated with air pollution, leading to environmental injustice.
To read more about Air Pollution click here
https://brainly.com/question/31023039
#SPJ11
The function of a quasi contract is to impose a legal obligation on a party who purposely failed to fulfill an express promise. True or False
The function of a quasi-contract is to impose a legal obligation on a party who purposely failed to fulfill an express promise. True
quasi-contractAs a result, a Quasi contract is a fictitious contract. When we talk about a legitimate contract, we expect it to have features such as offer and acceptance, consideration, contracting ability, and free will. However, there are different forms of contracts. A quasi-contract is a legal arrangement that describes one party's commitment to another party if the former has the latter party's property, i.e., something is gained by one party at the expense of another. A quasi contract is one that is formed by a court order rather than by an agreement reached by the contract's parties.
To know more about Quasi-contract visit the link
https://brainly.com/question/27993061
#SPJ4
Do citizens care enough to actively participate in policymaking, or would any resources devoted to participatory processes be better directed toward implementation?
Citizens tend to care about policies that directly affect their daily lives, and they are more likely to participate in policymaking processes when they feel that their voices are being heard and that they can make a difference.
Participatory processes can be valuable in providing a space for citizens to voice their opinions, concerns, and ideas, and to work collaboratively with policymakers to develop more effective policies. However, these processes can also be time-consuming and resource-intensive, and may not always result in significant changes to policy outcomes.
Ultimately, it is important to strike a balance between participatory processes and implementation efforts. Policymakers need to consider the potential benefits of participatory processes, including increased community engagement and support for policies, against the costs of implementing such processes. Additionally, policymakers need to ensure that participatory processes are inclusive, accessible, and meaningful for all members of the community, including those who may not have traditionally been included in policy discussions.
To learn more about citizens here
https://brainly.com/question/11052165
#SPJ4
All of the following are part of the state's Democratic Party's platform except they
believe the federal government should not change the No Child Left Behind program.
propose amnesty for long-term, working illegal immigrants.
was a third-party candidate who had not received 5 percent of the vote during the primary.
The state's Democratic Party's platform includes a range of positions on various issues, including education and immigration. However, they do not believe that the federal government should leave the No Child Left Behind program unchanged.
This program has been a subject of controversy, with some arguing that it places too much emphasis on standardized testing and not enough on individualized learning and support for students and teachers. The Democratic Party generally advocates for more funding for education and policies that support student success and teacher empowerment.
Additionally, the Democratic Party does propose amnesty for long-term, working illegal immigrants. This position is based on the belief that these individuals contribute to the economy and should be given a path to citizenship. However, this proposal does not mean that the party supports open borders or the unrestricted entry of individuals into the country.
Lastly, the Democratic Party is unlikely to nominate a third-party candidate who has not received at least 5 per cent of the vote during the primary. This requirement helps ensure that the party's nominee has sufficient support from voters and a viable chance of winning the general election. Overall, the Democratic Party's platform is designed to promote policies that support the interests of working people, promote social justice and equality, and protect the environment and public health.
To know more about the Democratic Party visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14320124
#SPJ11
in near v. minnesota, the supreme court issued a strong statement regarding which of the following?
In Near v. Minnesota, the Supreme Court issued a strong statement regarding the protection of freedom of the press and the unconstitutionality of prior restraint.
The Court held that the government could not censor or prohibit a publication in advance, except in very limited and specific circumstances. This decision reinforced the First Amendment rights to free speech and freedom of the press, emphasizing the importance of these liberties in a democratic society.The Court held that the government cannot prevent publication or dissemination of material unless it poses a clear and present danger to national security.In Near v. Minnesota, the Supreme Court issued a strong statement regarding the First Amendment's protection of freedom of the press. The Court held that a Minnesota law that allowed for the prior restraint of publication of newspapers was unconstitutional. Prior restraint is the government's censorship of speech before it is published or spoken. The Court found that the Minnesota law violated the First Amendment because it allowed the government to censor speech based on its content, rather than on its impact on public safety.
The Court's decision in Near v. Minnesota was a landmark ruling that helped to establish the principle that the First Amendment protects freedom of the press from government censorship. The decision has been cited in numerous subsequent cases involving freedom of speech, and it remains an important precedent today.
The specific language of the Supreme Court's statement in Near v. Minnesota is as follows:
The general principle that the First Amendment precludes the existence of any prior restraint upon publication cannot be doubted.
The Court went on to explain that the First Amendment protects freedom of the press because it is essential to a free and democratic society. The Court stated that "the press was to be free from previous restraints because it is essential to the role of the press to serve as a check on government power."
The Court's decision in Near v. Minnesota was a major victory for freedom of the press, and it helped to ensure that the First Amendment would continue to protect the right of the press to publish without government censorship.
To learn more about Supreme Court visit: https://brainly.com/question/25903338
#SPJ11
2. A, being a business minded person
decided to put a business (KTV Bar)
beside San Sebastian College, Manila.
As part of
of its promotion, live
entertainment is being offered. Most of
its patrons are students. The operation of
the business starts from 1pm and ends
at 4am. Can the municipal mayor order
the foreclosure
of
business
Yes, the municipal mayor can order the foreclosure of A's business if it is found to be violating any laws or ordinances.
Why can the municipal mayor order the foreclosure ?In the present scenario, the commercial entity is sited in close proximity to an educational institution and facilitates live amusement services. This has the potential to cause disturbance to the students and the vicinal populace.
Moreover, the enterprise conducts its operations from 1:00 PM until 4:00 AM, thus deviating from standard business hours. This phenomenon has the potential to result in the emission of sound waves perceived as excessive by individuals, commonly referred to as noise pollution, as well as other disruptions.
The municipal mayor possesses the authority to implement and uphold legal regulations while safeguarding the welfare of the general public. In the event that a violation of laws or ordinances by A's business is discovered, the individual in question possesses the power to mandate the closure of said business.
Find out more on foreclosure at https://brainly.com/question/13055547
#SPJ1
3. How seriously a felony will be classified in NYS, that is whether as an A, B, C, D or E
felony, is primarily determined by the crime's element of_______
considered together with its accompanying _______
element.
Answer:
is this multiple choice question?
Explanation:
Question 2 of 20
What impact does interest have on the cost of the purchases you make when
using credit?
A. Interest has no impact because most credit cards do not charge
interest.
B. Interest can cause the overall cost of your purchases to increase.
C. Interest can cause the overall cost of your purchases to decrease.
OD. Interest has no impact because it is separate from the actual
purchase prices.
Option B is correct. The impact that the interest have on the cost of the purchases you make when using the credit is that the interest can cause the overall cost of your purchases to increase.
The meaning of interest
Interest is the fee paid for having the access to the borrowed funds. While the interest rate used to compute the interest is often reported as an annual percentage rate, the interest expense or revenue is sometimes expressed as a dollar figure (APR). Interest is the payment a lender or a financial institution makes in exchange for lending out money.
To know more about Interest:
brainly.com/question/13324776
#SPJ1
1.2 With reference to the relevant constitutional law authorities, succinctly explain the difference between parliamentary sovereignty and constitutional supremacy from a South African perspective, with particular emphasis on the role of the judiciary in democratic South Africa.
The ultimate source of legislative power is where parliamentary sovereignty and constitutional supremacy diverge most. It is the legislature in parliamentary supremacy; it is a state's constitution in constitutional supremacy.
What is meant by parliamentary sovereignty?A notion in the constitutional law of various parliamentary democracies is parliamentary sovereignty, often known as parliamentary supremacy or legislative supremacy. It asserts that the legislative body is superior over all other governmental entities, including the executive and judicial branches. The UK constitution upholds the notion of parliamentary sovereignty. As a result, Parliament is now the supreme legal authority in the UK, with the power to enact and repeal any law. In general, its laws cannot be overruled by the courts, and no Parliament may approve legislation that cannot be altered by subsequent legislatures.The idea of constitutional supremacy accords the constitution the highest power within a legal system. Stating this principle does not merely include listing legal requirements in ascending priority. The issue is more complex than just a clash of opposing norms.Hence, The ultimate source of legislative power is where parliamentary sovereignty and constitutional supremacy diverge most. It is the legislature in parliamentary supremacy; it is a state's constitution in constitutional supremacy.
To learn more about parliamentary sovereignty refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/14621416
#SPJ4
When an objective standard is used, the courts ask whether a reasonable person would be satisfied with the performance. Sometimes the contract is conditioned on the satisfaction of a third party.
The agreement may occasionally be subject to the approval of a third party. A contract that commits two or more parties to carrying out or refraining from performing an action now or in the future.
A third party is not considered a party to the agreement just because they have the legal ability to enforce it. The third party merely has the same legal rights to sue regarding the contract as if they were a party to it, including the right to seek damages or an injunction.
This illustrative clause completely precludes the application of the Contracts (Third Party Rights) Act. It takes an artistic skill to construct provisions like this that offer rights to third parties rather than exclude them. It depends on the rights that are to be awarded, who is to receive them, and the restrictions placed on those rights.
The risk that the parties to a contract take on increases when third parties are given rights under the agreement.
To know more about Contract visit:
https://brainly.com/question/22440306
#SPJ4
give your own position on this specific problem in our country
Answer:
Corruption
Explanation:
Corruption is one of the problem of our country Nigeria because if the embezzlement of public funds by our government
Martha is a website owner and operator of techtalk.org (a fictitious website) owned by TechTalk LLC. Martha writes reviews of new technology products and makes money from online advertising on the website. For each article, Martha includes a copyright notice of “© 2012 TechTalk” at the bottom of each article but has not registered the articles with the U.S. Copyright Office. Martha runs a search on the Internet and finds that a competing website has three articles that are strikingly similar to articles appearing on techtalk.org with more than 80 percent similarity in the text. Describe the requirements for TechTalk LLC in bringing a copyright infringement action. What remedies could TechTalk LLC seek? What defenses could apply?
The requirements in bringing a copyright infringement action will be that the work must be registered before the action is in motion.
The remedies that TechTalk LLC can seek include a temporary restraining order , monetary damages, etc.
The defenses that could be applied are the nature of the copyrighted work and that the infringed work was published before.
Learn more about copyright on:
https://brainly.com/question/357686
Select the examples that best demonstrate likely tasks for Professional Support Services workers. Check all that apply. Leon gives psychological tests to students and assesses their results. Helen sets goals, and creates rules and policies for a school. Alexander helps high-school students decide which classes to take. Ebony helps children find books and magazines in a school library. Kyle teaches a kindergarten class that prepares students for first grade. Francisca is a parent who donates money to a school program.
Answer: 1, 3, 4
Explanation:
i took the test
Answer:
A C D
Explanation:
Edge 2021