please help i will mark brainliest

The required amount of the space available is 0.045 cubic meter.

We need to determine Space inside the steps.

The Volume is defined as the mass of object per unit density.

The required space = 0.3*0.4*0.5 - 0.15*0.5*0.2

                                 =  0.06 - 0.015

                                 =    0.045 cubic meter

Hence, the required amount of the space available will be 0.045 cubic meter.

Learn more about Volume here:

brainly.com/question/1578538

#SPJ1

Answer:

10/6

15/9

20/12

25/15

30/18

35/21

Answer:

10/6

Step-by-step explanation:

If you multiply the top and bottom by the same number the resulting fraction is equal.  In this case I multiplied top and bottom by 2.

Answer:

yes the square root of 144 is 12

Step-by-step explanation:

12 x 12 = 144 and 144 divided by 12 = 12

Answer:

the answer is 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

18/7 or 2 4/7

Step-by-step explanation:

KCF (Keep Change Flip)

6/7 * 3/1 = 18/7 or 2 4/7

Answer: 18/7 Simplified form is 2 4/7 Decimal form is 2.57

Answer:

-2

Step-by-step explanation:

divide -6 by 3 to get r=-2

Hope that helps

Answer: How to solve your problem

3

=

−

6

Solve

1

Divide both sides of the equation by the same term

3

=

−

6

3

3

=

−

6

3

2

Simplify

Solution

=

−

2

Step-by-step explanation:

plz mark brainliest

Answer:

x = 11

Step-by-step explanation:

(9x - 5) + (6x + 20) = 180

15x + 15 = 180

15x + 15 -15 = 180 -15

15x = 165

15x/15 = 165/15

x = 11

Answer: 180 i think

Step-by-step explanation: .5*200+.2X=.3(200+X)

100+.2X=60+.3X

.2X-.3X=60-100

-.1X=-40

X=-40/-.1

X=400 OUNCES OF 20% COPPER.

PROOF

.5*200+.2*400=.3(200+400)

100+80=.3*600

100+80=180

180=180

Answer: 100 ounces of the alloy.

Step-by-step explanation: To solve, we create an equation:

First, though, let's define some variables and values -

x = amount of the alloy we are trying to find

0.3 = 30% copper

0.6 = 60% copper

50 = 50 ounces of the alloy

0.3(x) + 0.6(50) = 0.4(x+50) - original equation

0.3x + 0.6*50 = 0.4x + 0.4*50 - expanded

subtract 0.3x and 0.4*50 on both sides to get...

0.2*50 = 0.1x - simplified

calculate...

10 = 0.1x - simplified

divide both sides by 0.1 to get...

100 = x --> x = 100

Answer:

\(a_{61}=-972\)

Step-by-step explanation:

Arithmetic Sequences

The arithmetic sequences are identified because any term n is obtained by adding or subtracting a fixed number to the previous term. That number is called the common difference.

The equation to calculate the nth term of an arithmetic sequence is:

\(a_n=a_1+(n-1)r\)

Where

an = nth term

a1 = first term

r   = common difference

n  = number of the term

We are given the first terms of a sequence:

-12, -28, -44,...

Find the common difference by subtracting consecutive terms:

r = -28 - (-12) = -16

r = -44 - (-28) = -16

The first term is a1 = -12. Now we calculate the term n=61:

\(a_{61}=-12+(61-1)(-16)\)

\(a_{61}=-12-60*16=-12-960\)

\(\mathbf{a_{61}=-972}\)

Yes, knowing the value of b, the slope of the regression line, allows us to predict the correlation coefficient value with accuracy.

Regression and correlation techniques can be used to establish links between variables.

Every day, we refer to any form of association as a "correlation," using that word.

To determine whether or if there is a relationship between the variables under investigation, correlation analysis is used.

Although regression illustrates how the variables are related,

Correlation and regression analysis can be shown graphically using scatter plots.

According to the question,

If we know the value of the slopes of the regression line say byx and bxy

We can Calculate the value of Correlation coefficient by using the relation

=> r = √(byx × bxy)

Hence , Yes We can accurately guess the value of correlation when slope of regression line is given

To know more about Regression and Correlation here

https://brainly.com/question/29820584

#SPJ4

A) If the change in b results in a smaller feasible region, then the optimal objective value will either remain the same or increase.

B)  If the change in b results in a larger feasible region, then the optimal objective value may remain the same or decrease.

In linear programming, the objective is to minimize or maximize an objective function subject to certain constraints. One common constraint is that the solution must be in the feasible region, which is defined by the set of all solutions that satisfy the constraints.

Recall that the constraints are given by Ax >= b, where A is a matrix of coefficients and x is a vector of variables. If we increase one component of b, say bi, then the set of solutions that satisfy the constraints will change. Specifically, any solution that previously satisfied Ax >= b may no longer satisfy the constraints, since the left-hand side of the inequality is fixed while the right-hand side has increased. In other words, the feasible region may shrink or shift in response to the change in b.

Now let's consider the effect on the optimal objective value. Recall that the objective function is given by cx, where c is a vector of coefficients. The optimal objective value is the minimum (or maximum) value of cx over all solutions in the feasible region. If we increase one component of b, then the optimal objective value may or may not change, depending on the specifics of the problem.

To see why, let's think about what happens to the feasible region. As we noted above, the feasible region may shrink or shift in response to the change in b. If the optimal solution was previously at the boundary of the feasible region, then it may no longer be feasible, and the optimal objective value will increase. On the other hand, if the optimal solution was previously in the interior of the feasible region, then it may still be feasible, and the optimal objective value will remain the same.

To know more about vector here.

https://brainly.com/question/29740341

#SPJ4

When 'x' is 5, the Algebraic  expression 3x - 4 evaluates to 11.

To find the algebraic expression for "4 less than the product of 3 and some number," let's break it down step by step.

First, let's define the unknown number as 'x.' Since the problem states "the product of 3 and some number," we can express this as 3 * x or simply 3x.

Next, we want to subtract 4 from this product. The phrase "4 less than" indicates subtraction, so we subtract 4 from 3x. This can be represented as 3x - 4.

In summary, the algebraic expression for "4 less than the product of 3 and some number" is 3x - 4, where 'x' represents the unknown number.

To calculate the value of this expression for a specific value of 'x,' you substitute that value into the expression and simplify. For example, if 'x' is 5, you would substitute 5 into the expression:

3(5) - 4

This simplifies to:

15 - 4 = 11

So, when 'x' is 5, the expression 3x - 4 evaluates to 11.

In general, the algebraic expression allows us to represent a mathematical relationship between quantities using symbols and operations. By substituting specific values into the expression, we can calculate the corresponding results.

For more such question Algebraic  expression visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2164351

#SPJ8

Note the complete question:

Algebraic expression for 4 less than the product of 3 and some number

What is the algebraic expression for "4 less than the product of 3 and some number?

Please help me understand the meaning of how to calculate.

Answer: $5400

Step-by-step explanation:

x =  amount raised so far

13500 - x = amt. still needed

x/3 = (13500 - x)/2

2x = 3(13500 - x)

2x = 40500 - 3x

5x = 40500

x = 40500/5 = 8100 (amt. raised so far)

13500 - 8100 = 5400 (amt. still needed)

Answer: is 14 square feet bro

Step-by-step explanatio

Answer:

look at the picture i have sent. thanks for the points

Answer: 18

Step-by-step explanation:

\(\triangle HJK \cong \triangle HLK\) by HL. Therefore, \(JK=2\) by CPCTC.

Using the segment addition postulate, \(GK=9\).

Furthermore, \(\triangle HGK \cong \triangle HMK\) by HL. This means that \(MK=9\) by CPCTC.

Using the segment addition postulate again, \(GM=9+9=18\).

Step-by-step explanation:

step 1. all the side length are different therefore all of the internal angles are different.

step 2. a triangle with all different angles is scalene.

step 3. all of the angles are less than 90°

step 4. a triangle with all angles less than 90° is acute.

PLEASE GIVE BRAINLIST

equal

quotation marks

HOPE THIS HELPED

The solutions of the equation of the graph is -4 and 2.

An placement of values to the uncertainties that establishes the equality in the equation is referred to as a solution. To put it another way, a solution is a value or set of values (one for each unknown) that, when used to replace the unknowns, cause the equation to equal itself. Particularly but not exclusively for polynomial equations, the solution of an equation is frequently referred to as the equation's root. An equation's solution set is the collection of all possible solutions.

We know that the solution of the equation is determined using the graph by obtaining the point of intersection of the equation.

In the given graph the point of intersection of the two equations are at x = -4 and x = 2.

Hence, the solutions of the equation of the graph is -4 and 2.

Learn more about equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/556412

#SPJ1

The complete question is:

Answer: 7.9

Step-by-step explanation:

\(P=2000, r=0.09, n=2\\\\4000=2000\left(1+\frac{0.09}{2} \right)^{2t}\\\\4000=2000(1.045)^{2t}\\\\2=1.045^{2t}\\\\\log_{1.045} 2=2t\\\\t=\frac{\log_{1.045} 2}{2}\\\\t \approx 7.9\)

Answer:

0.7

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

0.35

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

thx for giving brainliest

Answer:

The distance of the line would be 10 units.

The cost of the three lightest packages is $8.80.

The cost of the remaining packages is $33.60.

The total cost of all packages is $42.40.

In Mathematics and Statistics, a line plot can be defined as a type of graph that is used for the graphical representation of data set above a number line, while using crosses, dots, or any other mathematical symbol.

By critically observing the line plot that represents the weight of meat, we have the following weights:

Three lightest weights = 5/8 pounds + 5/8 pounds + 6/8 pounds

Cost of three lightest weights = (5/8 + 5/8 + 6/8) × $4.40

Cost of three lightest weights = $8.80.

Cost of remaining package = (1 + 1 1/8 + 1 1/8 + 1 1/8 + 1 2/8 + 1 3/8) × $4.80

Cost of remaining package = $33.60

Total cost of all packages = $8.80 + $33.60 = $42.40.

Read more on line plot here: brainly.com/question/28741427

#SPJ1

Missing information:

The question is incomplete and the complete question is shown in the attached picture.

The set of rational numbers and the set of irrational numbers make up the set of real numbers

The key parameters in the question are:

Rational numbers can be represented as a fraction of two integers, while irrational numbers cannot

When these two sets of numbers are combined, they form the set of real numbers

Hence, the complete statement is the set of rational numbers and the set of irrational numbers make up the set of real numbers

Read more about irrational numbers at

https://brainly.com/question/11919233

#SPJ1

The absolute change is given by the subtraction of the values (final value minus initial value):

Therefore the absolute change is -23 units.

Then, to find the relative change, we need to divide the absolute change by the initial value:

Therefore the relative change is -3.28%.

on the right side should have been added to

Answer:

The graph should have closed not open circles

Step-by-step explanation: