Answer:
Slavery in the Antebellum Period
Slavery was a form of forced labor existing as a legal institution from the colonial period until the mid-nineteenth century.
General Rochambeau helped General Washington by
providing French troops for the Battle of Yorktown.
attacking General Gates at the Battle of Camden.
attacking General Greene at the Battle of Guilford Court House.
providing French ships for the Battle of Yorktown.
Answer:
d
Explanation:
how did genghis khan conquer such a large empire
Answer:
How were Mongols able to conquer such a large empire? By ruthless inter-breeding.
Explanation:
They had traditions of extreme warfare violence followed by murdering the ruling class of the other tribes then interbreeding the two tribes, so the offspring would all be a part of the Mongols one tribe
One reason southern plantation owners wanted to stop using indentured servants is because
Answer:
Why did Southern planters switch from using indentured servants to using slaves? Many landowners also felt threatened by newly freed servants demand for land. The colonial elite realized the problems of indentured servitude.
Explanation:
Answer:B
Explanation:
in 1812, henry clay and john c. calhoun could best be described as
In 1812, Henry Clay and John C. Calhoun could best be described as members of the War Hawks faction of the United States Congress.
The War Hawks was a group of Democratic-Republican congressmen from the southern and western regions of the United States who supported the War of 1812 with Great Britain. They were led by Speaker of the House Henry Clay of Kentucky and South Carolina Congressman John C. Calhoun.The War Hawks favored expansionism and the annexation of Canada and Florida. They believed that the British were interfering with American trade and providing arms to Native Americans who were attacking settlers in the western territories. They also saw the war as an opportunity to prove American military strength and gain more territory.
In conclusion, in 1812, Henry Clay and John C. Calhoun could best be described as members of the War Hawks faction of the United States Congress, which was in favor of the War of 1812 with Great Britain and favored expansionism and annexation of Canada and Florida.
Learn more about Henry Clay and John C. Calhoun here: https://brainly.com/question/28823553
#SPJ11
Henry Clay and John C. Calhoun are two political leaders who served in the United States government in the early 19th century. Clay and Calhoun were prominent members of the Whig and Democratic parties, respectively.
They are best known for their contributions to the early development of the American political system and their roles in shaping the nation's policies on issues such as slavery, states' rights, and territorial expansion. Henry Clay was a senator from Kentucky who played a significant role in shaping American politics during his time in office. He was a leading advocate for the Whig party and served as Speaker of the House of Representatives for several years. Clay was known for his support of the American System, a plan that called for high tariffs on imported goods, a national bank to manage the nation's finances, and investments in transportation infrastructure, such as roads and canals. This system was designed to promote economic growth and unity across the nation.
John C. Calhoun, on the other hand, was a senator from South Carolina who was deeply committed to the cause of states' rights. He was a leading voice in the Democratic party and was known for his defense of slavery and his opposition to the federal government's interference in state affairs. Calhoun argued that the states had the right to nullify or ignore federal laws that they deemed unconstitutional. He believed that the federal government should have limited powers and that the states should be free to govern themselves as they saw fit. In conclusion, in 1812, Henry Clay and John C. Calhoun could best be described as influential political leaders who had distinct views on the role of the federal government in American life. Clay was a proponent of a strong central government and economic growth, while Calhoun believed in states' rights and limited federal authority. Both men played a significant role in shaping American politics during their time in office and left lasting legacies that continue to influence the nation today.
To know more about prominent visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/16489495
#SPJ11
what role did the former samurai warriors assume under the tokugawa shogunate? artists bureaucrats courtesans farmers
Under the Tokugawa shogunate in Japan, former samurai warriors assumed the role of bureaucrats.
Under the Tokugawa shogunate, samurai warriors lost their traditional military role as Japan was unified and experienced relative peace.
The shogunate government created a rigid social hierarchy in which samurai became part of the ruling class and were assigned administrative and policing roles in society.
The samurai were tasked with keeping social order, enforcing laws, and protecting their domains. They became bureaucrats and administrators, serving in various government offices as governors, magistrates, and tax collectors.
Many samurai also turned to arts and culture, particularly poetry, calligraphy, and tea ceremony.
They studied Confucianism and Neo-Confucianism, which became the official ideology of the Tokugawa shogunate, emphasizing social hierarchy, loyalty, and moral behavior.
Some samurai also became merchants, farmers, or entrepreneurs to make a living.
The samurai's new roles and occupations under the Tokugawa shogunate reflected the period's emphasis on social stability, order, and cultural refinement.
Despite losing their traditional warrior status, samurai continued to play a vital role in shaping Japan's social, political, and cultural landscape during this time.
To know more about bureaucrats refer here
brainly.com/question/14346682#
#SPJ11
A "good emperor" in rome
Answer:
Here are a couple of them
Explanation:
Justinian (482 AD – 14 November, 565 AD) Constantine the Great (February 272 AD – May 337 AD) Antoninus Pius (19 September, 86 AD – 7 March, 161 AD) Vespasian (November 9 AD – 23 June, 79 AD) Hadrian (January 76 AD – 10 July, 138 AD) Claudius (August 10 BC – 13 October, 54 ADAnswer:
the "good emperor" is Augustus. i think
Explanation:
how did the leaders of the ghana, mali, and songhai empires become wealthy and maintain control over the western sudan? they formed alliances with north african states to militarily dominate the entire african continent. they generated wealth primarily through cattle breeding and used christianity to unite the people within their realms. they lacked productive agriculture, but were able to build wealthy states by monopolizing the continent's trade in ivory. they controlled access to west african gold during a period when gold was in very high demand.
Just as the Ghana Empire was establishing itself, West Africa experienced a boom in trade that brought wealth and power. It undoubtedly helped that the empire was in charge of the three important gold fields that were south of them.
A wealth of rich land and important marine trade routes were accessible due to Carthage's advantageous location. With a vast trade network that extended as far as northern Europe, west Africa, and west Asia, it was able to export both valuable agricultural and manufactured goods as well as a wide range of commodities from the ancient world.
Ghana grew to be a strong empire thanks to the gold-salt trade in Africa, where they controlled the trade routes and levied taxes on merchants. Ghana, Mali, and Songhai became great, strong West African kingdoms thanks to their control over the gold-salt trade routes.
Learn more about Ghana Empire visit: https://brainly.com/question/28757229
#SPJ4
⚠️ Please help⚠️
Some people were upset about the Supreme Court's Bush v. Gore ruling
because the Court:
A. overruled the decision of a state court.
B. weakened the power of the Electoral College.
C. forced Florida to update its voting system.
D. declared that a recount must happen.
l
Explanation:
overruled the decision
4. What was the purpose of the Pendleton Act?
a. to require the use of secret ballots
b. to institute the federal income tax
c. to reform the civil service system
d. to allow the direct election of senators
The purpose of the Pendleton Act, also known as the Civil Service Reform Act, was to reform the civil service system in the United States. The correct option is c.
The act, which was passed in 1883, replaced the patronage system, in which government jobs were given out based on political support and association, with a merit-based system. The Pendleton Act established the Civil Service Commission to control government employee hiring and promotion based on merit and performance rather than political connections.
By selecting competent people to hold public office, this act aims to improve the effectiveness and professionalism of the federal administration. Therefore, to restructure the public service system is the right response.
Thus, the ideal selection is option c.
Learn more about The Pendleton Act here:
https://brainly.com/question/29886242
#SPJ4
will mark brainliest
Short Answer: Showing how similar and/or different nations are governed, compare and contrast the European and Japanese Feudal Systems from the Middle Ages.
Your Response Must Include:
Main Point (Thesis)
Evidence (Minimum of Three Pieces)
Definite Conclusion (No Run-On Ending)
Your Response Should Be:
A Full Paragraph (Introduction, Thesis, Evidence x3, & Conclusion)
Well Worded & Punctuated
Written Using Appropriate Grammar
***Read Your Response BEFORE Submitting***
THESIS: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EVIDENCE 1: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EVIDENCE 2: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EVIDENCE 3: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CONCLUSION: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The European and Japanese feudal systems of the Middle Ages were similar in that they were both hierarchically structured systems in which a small group of powerful lords controlled the land and the majority of the population were peasants who were bound to the land and owed allegiance to their lords.
What is are comparisons between European and Japanese Feudal SystemsThesis: The European and Japanese feudal systems from the Middle Ages had both similarities and differences in their political and social structures, with the European system being based on a hierarchy of lords and vassals, and the Japanese system being based on a hierarchy of shoguns and daimyos.
Evidence 1: Both systems were characterized by a hierarchical structure, with a powerful noble class at the top and a peasant class at the bottom. In Europe, this hierarchy was based on lords and vassals. In Japan, the hierarchy was based on shoguns and daimyos.
Evidence 2: Both systems also relied heavily on the use of military force to maintain control and enforce their authority. European lords and vassals would engage in battles with one another to gain control over land and resources, while Japanese shoguns and daimyos would engage in battles with one another to gain control over territories and resources.
Evidence 3: However, there were also some key differences between the two systems. One major difference was that European feudalism was based on a system of inheritance, with lords passing their lands and titles down to their children, while Japanese feudalism was based on a system of appointment, with shoguns appointing daimyos to rule over specific territories.
Conclusion: Overall, the European and Japanese feudal systems from the Middle Ages had both similarities and differences in their political and social structures. While both systems were characterized by a hierarchical structure and relied heavily on the use of military force, the European system was based on a system of inheritance and the Japanese system was based on a system of appointment.
Learn more about feudal systems here: https://brainly.com/question/4141227
#SPJ1
Puritan settlers seeking religious freedom from the Church of England
founded which North American settlement?
OA. New France
OB. St. Augustine
OC. Plymouth
OD. New Netherland
Answer:
Explanation: the answer is playmouth
Which Article is these consitutions from? 2nd post.. ima set it to 100 points.
example: “We the People of the United States,” , Article I—Legislative Branch
1. in Order to form a more perfect Union,
2.establish Justice,
3.insure domestic Tranquility,
4.provide for the common defence,
5. Promote the general Welfare,
6.and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity,
7.and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity,
The Preamble of the United States Constitution articulates the broad objectives of the government and its commitment to establishing a more perfect union, ensuring justice, domestic tranquility, common defense, general welfare, and securing liberty for the people.
The excerpt provided, "in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity," is from the Preamble of the United States Constitution. The Preamble serves as an introductory statement that outlines the fundamental purposes and goals of the Constitution.
The Preamble is not specifically attributed to a particular article of the Constitution. It sets the tone and overarching principles that guide the entire document. The six goals stated in the Preamble reflect the intentions of the framers to create a strong, just, and unified nation that ensures peace, defense, welfare, and liberty for both the present and future generations.
While the Preamble does not carry legal authority on its own, it provides important context and helps to interpret the Constitution's provisions. It serves as a reminder of the aspirations and values upon which the Constitution is built.
for more questions on Constitution
https://brainly.com/question/470736
#SPJ8
HELPPPP
What was NOT a reason why the ayatollahs opposed the shah of Iran?
The shah made efforts to increase women's rights.
The shah was influenced by the West.
The shah catered to Soviet interests.
The shah was a benevolent dictator.
Answer: A i think
Explanation:
plz help What famous poem did Francis Scott Key write?
Answer: The Star Spangled Banner
Explanation: The Star Spangled Banner was written by Francis Scott key on September 14 1814.
it is often said that the church was the great patron of the Arts of Western Christendom. Defend this statement by describing some of the landmarks (literary, visual, and aural) indebted to church patronage.
Answer:
well I think a key example would be the sisten Chaple in Italy
Church patronage relies heavily on architecture like cathedrals, churches, monasteries, painting like altarpieces, church murals, decorative art, and illuminated manuscripts.
What is the Church Patronage?
A saint to whom a person, a community, a church, or a location is consecrated for protection and intercession
The act of establishing a church, chapel, or religious institution, as well as the benefits that such benefactors receive.
The special heavenly patrons officially assigned to nations, dioceses, towns, and institutions are also referred to as patronage.
Thus, Church Patronage is the culture of art, visual and literary, and manuscripts.
Learn more about Church Patronage here:
https://brainly.com/question/17168104
Solve pls brainliest!
how does the constitution divide powers between national and state governments
Answer: The Constitution divide powers because they have certain specified powers. National Government is based on federalism which is a system that divided between the national and state governments.
Look at the map above, what does the legend show?
Answer:
The legend shows the major Mayan cities with black dots and it also shows the Mayan lands from 790 A.D. by a shaded area.
Theodore roosevelt won the nobel peace prize for his diplomatic efforts in ending what war?.
Theodore Roosevelt won the Nobel Peace Prize for his diplomatic efforts in ending the Russo-Japanese War.
Theodore Roosevelt was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1906 for his mediation in the negotiations that led to the Treaty of Portsmouth, effectively ending the Russo-Japanese War. The war had begun in 1904 between the Russian Empire and the Empire of Japan over territorial disputes in East Asia, specifically regarding control over Korea and Manchuria. As the President of the United States, Roosevelt saw an opportunity to demonstrate American diplomacy on the world stage. He facilitated negotiations in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, and successfully brokered a peace agreement between the two warring nations. His efforts were praised for their contribution to ending the conflict and establishing a more stable balance of power in the region. This recognition through the Nobel Peace Prize highlighted Roosevelt's significant role in international diplomacy and his commitment to peaceful resolutions of conflicts.
learn more about Russo-Japanese War here:
https://brainly.com/question/27867091
#SPJ11
How did the federal government respond to the Great Depression, and what were the reactions to the New Deal?
Under President Franklin D. Roosevelt, the New Deal was a series of domestic policies that greatly increased the role of the federal government in the economy in response to the Great Depression. it Includes measures like government became active in businesses, taxed wealthy, created jobs for unemployed, subsidy to farmers to lower price on crops.
the alexander sarcophagus depicts the soldiers of gaza as having orange hair. gaza was a trade town which connect arabia to egypt. why is muhammed thought of to be orange haired? as is ghenhis khan?
The color of hair in the Alexander Sarcophagus is not meant to be taken literally, but rather symbolically. The orange hair of the figures is meant to symbolize Alexander's bravery and ferocity and is meant to represent courage and strength.
Muhammad and Genghis Khan are not thought of as having orange hair, but rather their images are often associated with symbols of strength and courage, which is likely why they are sometimes depicted with orange hair.
The depiction of orange hair in the Alexander Sarcophagus is meant to be a metaphor for Alexander’s strength and courage in battle. Similarly, the symbolic use of orange hair to represent strength and courage is why Muhammad and Genghis Khan are sometimes depicted with orange hair, to represent their courage and strength in battle.
Learn more about Alexander Sarcophagus at: https://brainly.com/question/906457
#SPJ4
how did America view their nations involvement in world affairs?
Answer: 73% of Americans believe that diplomacy is the best way to maintain peace in the world while the rest believe that the military might do the work. Three-fourths of the population believes that country's involvement in the global economy helps the country to boost its economic progress through new markets and opportunities for growth
Explanation: Larger number of Americans think it's good for America to take a stand for the allies even though compromise their interests, compared to those who think that the States should follow their interests. Wide majorities of Democrats look forward to diplomacy as the best policy to ensure peace and have a strong point to take allies into account while making foreign policy. Whereas in contradictions the Republicans are divided on this topic. Nearly 50% of the republicans think diplomacy to be the best way of ensuring peace whereas about 46% believe military might is the key.
About 53% of U.S adults believe that activeness of the country in world affairs would bring more glory in terms of power and might in the future. And about 46% say that the country needs to focus more on internal matters or matters at home rather than getting engaged in things overseas.
Three-fourths of the population believes that country's involvement in the global economy helps the country to boost its economic progress through new markets and opportunities for growth. While few of them believe that it lowers wages and costs jobs in the state itself.
A difference in opinion has also been observed among Americans based on the level of education they have attained. For Example, 86% of the adults who have completed their four-year college degree are observed to have a positive opinion about the country getting involved in the global economy. This belief clashes with the chunk of people who have not attended college and few of those who have attended some college years.
Know more about America's Two-Party System:
https://brainly.com/question/4766691
PLEASE HELP QUICKLY 20 points !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Civil War photographs showed the people 'back home' that war was...
(choose all that apply)
Select 3 correct answer(s)
Question 2 options:
magnificent
heroic
noble
tragic
devastating
bloody
Answer:
heroic and devastating
bcoz either the war is finished by winning or by losing
An obligation is an act or duty that someone is morally or legally bound to do. Which of the following is not an obligation of a good citizen? voting in every local, primary, and general election paying taxes according to the law where you live serving in the armed forces if drafted during wartime following traffic laws and speed limits at all times
Answer:
An obligation is an act or duty that someone is morally or legally bound to do. Which of the following is not an obligation of a good citizen?
voting in every local, primary, and general election<<<CORRECT paying taxes according to the law where you live serving in the armed forces if drafted during wartime following traffic laws and speed limits at all times Explanation: Edge 2021
The following is not an obligations :
voting in every local, primary, and general electionDefinition of 'Obligation' :An obligation is a duty or a commitment that a person has to act legally or morally.
Some of the obligations of a good citizen:paying taxes regularlyfollowing the law and the traffic rulesserving the armed forces at times of needs.Voting is not considered as an obligatory of a person. It is the right of the people but not bounded on them.
People can choose not to vote in an election if they don't want.
Therefore, voting in every election is not obligatory for a citizen
Find out more about "Voting" here :
https://brainly.com/question/1415519
Why did slavery cause conflict between Mexico and the U.S.
GEOGRAPHY SKILLBUILDER: Interpreting Maps
1. Region which civilization occupied the Yucatan Peninsula?
Answer:
the anser is b
Explanation:turkey
The first ten amendments to the US Constitution are also known as the
O Virginia Declaration of Rights.
O Articles of Confederation.
O Declaration of Independence.
O Bill of Rights
Answer:
d
Explanation:
The Bill of Rights is another name for the first 10 amendments of the US Constitution. Option (D) is right as a result.
Legal charters that proclaimed specific rights for particular people have a long history dating back to the Middle Ages and earlier. The Magna Carta, an English legal instrument ratified in 1215 by the King and his barons, serves as an illustration.
The Magna Carta attracted new attention in the early modern era. Sir Edward Coke, an English common law judge, reintroduced the notion of citizenship-based rights by asserting that Englishmen have traditionally benefited from them.
Certain rights were codified in law through the Petition of Right (1662), the Habeas Corpus Act (1679), and the Bill of Rights (1689; English Bill of Rights).
Learn more about Bill of Rights, from :
brainly.com/question/10618576
#SPJ2
which of the following statements best compares the climate of South and southwest asia
South Asia, represented here by India, has a diverse range of climate types, including:
- Tropical Monsoon
- Dry Summer Tropical Savanna
- Dry Winter Tropical Savanna
- Hot Semi-Arid
- Hot Desert
- Temperate Oceanic
- Hot Summer Mediterranean
- Monsoon Influenced Humid Subtropical
- Subtropical Highland
- Cold Subtropical Highland
- Warm Summer Humid Continental
- Subarctic
- Monsoon Influenced Warm Summer Humid Continental
- Monsoon Influenced Subarctic
- Polar Tundra
On the other hand, Southwest Asia, represented here by Saudi Arabia, primarily has:
- Hot Desert
- Cold Desert
In general, South Asia has a much more diverse range of climates, including both tropical and temperate climates, while Southwest Asia is primarily characterized by hot and cold desert climates.
how did american entry into world war ii impact ordinary americans?
American entry into World War II impacted ordinary Americans in a variety of ways. When the war started, the United States was still grappling with the effects of the Great Depression, which had left many Americans unemployed or underemployed.
To help finance the war effort, the government raised taxes, rationed essential goods, and created a nationwide draft. As a result, many Americans had to adjust their daily routines to accommodate wartime restrictions and requirements, and some struggled to make ends meet as the cost of living rose. Additionally, millions of young men were drafted into the military, leaving behind families, friends, and communities. Women and minorities entered the workforce in large numbers to replace these men, helping to transform American society and culture. Many Americans also sacrificed their lives, as well as those of their loved ones, in the fight against fascism and tyranny. American entry into World War II had a profound impact on ordinary Americans, shaping their lives and the country's history in countless ways.
For more such questions on World War II, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/651584
#SPJ11
What is some things China and Mexico have in common?
Answer:
Mexico and China have very similar exporting baskets, meaning the two countries ship similar products overseas every year.
Explanation:
Since China’s induction to the WTO in 2001, it has surpassed Mexico and has become the second largest exporter to U.S. market.