Before the 1970s, what EMS service was provided to the nation?

Answer:

The best paraphrase of this excerpt is "The law is self-executing, meaning that it can be enforced easily and without the need for lawmakers to change any existing laws. Within a year of its ratification, the amendment would automatically repeal any state or federal laws that conflict with it, without requiring legislative action."

Explanation:

The original excerpt explains the process by which a self-executing law would be enforced, and how it would automatically repeal any conflicting laws without requiring further legislative action. The paraphrase accurately conveys this information in a slightly different way, using simpler language and clearer syntax. The paraphrase emphasizes the self-executing nature of the law, and highlights the fact that no legislative action would be required to enforce it. Additionally, the paraphrase clearly states that the amendment would automatically repeal any conflicting laws within a year of its ratification.

The factors that are considered by a judge in deciding whether an offender should be sentenced to probation are the offence and the offender's qualities freedom or incarceration of the offender before and throughout the trial.

In terms of criminal law, probation is a period during which a defendant is not imprisoned but instead is subject to court-ordered monitoring. Probation solely refers to community penalties, such as suspended sentences, in some jurisdictions.

Typically, probationary periods are three months, six months, or a year long. The new employee is typically exempt from certain contractual obligations for a predetermined period of time at the beginning of the work relationship. Most importantly, probationary staff are subject to termination without the usual notice period.

To know more about probation: https://brainly.com/question/9567331

#SPJ4

Extractive institutions like coal, timber, etc.—that are often economically dominant in rural settings—tend to concentrate power in urban communities.

This is a term that is used to refer to institutions that extract wealth and natural resources from other areas.

The resources are often gotten from the rural areas and they are used in companies that are in the urban centers.

Read more on extractive institutions here:

https://brainly.com/question/10698634

#SPJ1

Yes, Goetz's past experiences should be considered when determining the reasonableness of his actions.

The physical size, age, dress, and behavior of the young men, as well as the fact that Ramseur and Cabey had screwdrivers, should also be taken into account.

When considering the reasonableness of Goetz's actions, the jury should evaluate the circumstances surrounding the incident.

Goetz's prior experiences could be relevant to the jury's decision, as could the physical size, age, dress, and behavior of the young men.

Additionally, the jury should take into consideration that Ramseur and Cabey were carrying screwdrivers. All of these factors should be evaluated in order to determine if Goetz's actions were reasonable in the context of the situation.

To know more about context of the situation click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29531686#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Murderer

Characteristics: Poisoner - Parricide

Number of victims: 1 +

Date of murder: August 28, 1965

Date of birth: 1933

Victim profile: His wife, Dr. Carmela Musetto, 32

Method of murder: Poisoning (anaesthetic succinylcholine chloride)

Location: New Jersey/Florida, USA

Status: Sentenced to life in prison on April 28, 1967. Paroled in 1979

Motive: So that he could marry his lover.

Crime: Coppolino was charged with killing his wife, Carmela at their home on Florida's Gulf of Mexico coast. He was also tried for murdering Colonel William E. Farber, the husband of his ex-lover Marjorie. However, he was acquitted from this offence.

Method: Coppolino gave Carmela an overdose in the form of an injection of the anaesthetic succinylcholine chloride.

Sentence: Coppolino was charged with second degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. He served 12 years, before being let out for good behaviour.

Interesting facts: An overdose of succinylcholine chloride is difficult to detect in the body, as succinic acid and choline are found naturally in the body. To be able to prove this was the cause of Carmela's death, toxicologst Dr Joseph Umberger had to devise a test, which in June 1966 he succeeded in doing.

Coppolino was an experienced anaesthetist, who had had to give up work at an early age due to ill health. So he had the knowledge and the means to kill Carmela in this way.

It was claimed that Coppolino had also killed Farber in the same way. When he was exhumed, it was discovered that his cricoid cartilage was fractured, which suggested that he had been strangled. In court it was claimed that this damage could have occurred during exhumation, and that he had sufficient arteriosclerosis to have died of a heart attack, as was originally supposed.

The correct answer to the question about distracted driving is: d. Other drivers must react more quickly.

When a driver is distracted, they may react slower to changes in traffic conditions, such as a car suddenly stopping or a pedestrian crossing the road. This can require other drivers on the road to react more quickly in order to avoid a collision.

Regarding the question about the drop in traffic fatalities per mile traveled in the US between 1970 and 1990, the generally accepted reason is: c. Seat belt use increased.

Learn more about driving on

https://brainly.com/question/1071840

#SPJ1

Answer: legislative, Executive, and Judicial. Hope this helped: )

Interest groups overcome the free rider problem by doing all of the following except providing collective goods, material benefits, solidary benefits, expressive benefits only to people who join the group. The correct option is a, b, c, d.

The above mentioned are ways of incentivizing them to become members and contribute to the group's efforts. The free rider problem refers to the tendency of individuals to enjoy the benefits of collective action without contributing to the effort themselves.

In the context of interest groups, this means that people may support the group's goals and benefit from its activities, but not contribute to the group's efforts by becoming a member or providing financial or other support.

To overcome the free rider problem, interest groups provide selective incentives that are only available to members, such as access to exclusive information, opportunities to participate in advocacy efforts, or discounts on products or services.

By providing these incentives, interest groups can encourage individuals to become members and contribute to the group's efforts, thus increasing their effectiveness in influencing public policy. Therefore, the correct option is a, b, c, d.

To know more about free rider problem here:

https://brainly.com/question/30751078

#SPJ4

The Confederate States' efforts to gain international support were crucial, but ultimately, they were unsuccessful.

Their reliance on cotton exports and diplomatic efforts were insufficient to overcome the Union's naval blockade and the reluctance of European powers to support a fledgling government with uncertain prospects.

During the Civil War, the Confederate States made various attempts to gain international support in their fight against the Union. One of the most significant efforts was their reliance on cotton exports to Britain and France. They hoped that their cotton supply would be so essential to the textile industries in these countries that they would receive support in return. However, the Union's blockade of Southern ports significantly impacted their ability to export cotton, and European countries found other sources to meet their textile needs.

The Confederacy also sent diplomats to Europe to negotiate diplomatic recognition and support. However, these efforts were unsuccessful, primarily due to their inability to prove that they had a viable government with control over their territory.

For More Such Questions on Confederate

https://brainly.com/question/8756278

#SPJ11

Well first you would need to know if the vet has any records of the dogs blood. Then you would also need to know if the they kidnapping victims doctor had samples of the victims blood. Then you would cross test the samples if the doctors had them to look for a match. !!! I AM NOT AN EXPERT THIS IS JUST WHAT I WOULD CONCLUDE !!!

Answer: Precipitin test

Explanation:

Answer:

to gather enough evidence for the trail

Extending working hours can be a sensitive issue, as it can impact the well-being and work-life balance of employees. There are several reasons why an organization may consider extending working hours, but not all reasons are considered valid.

Some of the valid reasons for extending working hours may include:

However, not all reasons for extending working hours are considered valid. Some of the invalid reasons for extending working hours may include:

To now more about extending working hours refer to-

brainly.com/question/556122#

#SPJ11

Complete Question

What are the valid and invalid reasons for extending working hours?

The regular hours worked last week were 40, and the overtime hours worked were 11. The gross pay for the week was $465.72.

To determine the regular and overtime hours, we need to know the weekly threshold for overtime pay. In the United States, the threshold is 40 hours per week. Any hours worked above 40 are considered overtime hours.

In this case, the employee worked a total of 51 hours in a week, which means that they worked 40 regular hours and 11 overtime hours.

To calculate the gross pay, we need to determine the regular pay and overtime pay separately, and then add them together.

Regular pay:

40 regular hours x $8.45/hour = $338

Overtime pay:

11 overtime hours x $8.45/hour x 1.5 (overtime rate) = $127.72

Gross pay:

$338 (regular pay) + $127.72 (overtime pay) = $465.72

Know more about gross pay here:

https://brainly.com/question/13143081

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Miranda Rights do not apply because they are not being detained neither arrested.

Explanation:

The officer doesn't have to read them their rights because they are not being arrested or detained they have a right to leave while the officer is questioning them. So since the officer only suspects he cant charge them with anything.

Strategies and best practices for navigating the challenges of modern management are embracing agility, fostering effective communication, and developing strong leadership.

Embrace Agility: In today's fast-paced and dynamic business environment, embracing agility is crucial.

Foster effective communication: Effective communication is the foundation of successful management.

Develop strong leadership: Effective leadership is essential for navigating the challenges of modern management. Leaders should inspire and motivate their teams, set a clear vision, and provide guidance and support.

By implementing these strategies and best practices, managers can effectively navigate the challenges of modern management, foster a positive work environment, and drive organizational success.

To learn more about the modern management, follow the link:

https://brainly.com/question/29332836

#SPJ1

Answer: A

Explanation:

But i might be wrong if so it is D

Answer:

The Trial Process

This webpage presents an overview of the formal processes and proceedings in any civil trial and a link to separate webpage that presents the specific chronology of events in the Woburn Toxic Trial. Links are also available to videoclips of Ohio State University students performing these tasks in a mock trial.

There are four main stages to a trial. In sequence, they are:

Pleading Stage - filing the complaint and the defense's motions.

Pretrial Stage - discovery process, finding of facts.

Trial Stage - seating of the jury, testimony on behalf of the plaintiffs and testimony on behalf of the defendants.

Post Trial - concluding arguments, judge's charge to the jury, jury deliberations, announcement of judgment, motions for new trial or appeal.

Pleading Stage

Filing a Complaint - In civil proceedings the complaint is the official engagement of the plaintiff with the defense regarding the proposed "injustice" caused by the defense. This is a formal document submitted by the plaintiff to the court having jurisdiction over the complaint.

Summons - Notification by the court in which the complaint is filed as an action being brought against the defense. Service of the summons typically requires a response from the defense within a 30-day period. No response from the defense can trigger a default judgment for the plaintiff.

Motions to Dismiss - These are the defense's response or answers to the plaintiffs complaint. The responses are typically filed as motions and are intended to dismiss the claims expressed in the complaint.

Motion for Judgment - Following the defendants response to the plaintiffs claims, the parties can either choose to settle or request a judgment based on the evidence presented, or the court can decide to continue toward resolving conflict at trial. If there is no judgment made, the case proceeds to the pre-trial stage.

Pretrial Stage

Discovery or Finding of Facts - There are generally two aspects of discovery. One consists of a series of questions, known as interrogatory questions, which are posed by the plaintiff's attorney to the defendant's attorney. The other consists of recording a witnesses sworn testimony, known as a deposition. Depositions typically take place outside the courtroom, before a court recorder, with opposing counsel asking questions of the witness.

Motion for Summary Judgment - At the conclusion of discovery, the court will typically review the facts of the case and determine if there is sufficient merit to proceed to trial or to encourage the parties to settle. If the finding of facts determines the case to be frivolous or non-substantiated, the case is dismissed.

Pretrial Order - If a substantial basis for the case is determined, the court will meet with and notify the parties of the trial schedule.

The Trial

Jury Selection - From a pool of potential jurors, individuals are questioned in a process known as voire dire to determine suitability to serve as impartial juror in the specific case. The judge and counsel for both parties are involved in voire dire process, with each party trying to impanel individuals who may be sympathetic to their cause.

Opening Statements - Statements to the jury made first by the plaintiffs' attorney and then by the defense attorneys setting up the circumstances and rationale of the legal complaint (plaintiffs) and the reasons for dismissing the claim (defense).

Click here to see a videoclip of opening statements from one of the Ohio State mock trials.

Plaintiff Testimony - The first part of the actual trial proceeding consists of the plaintiffs presenting their witnesses and experts to present the arguments and justifications for the complaint. The defense is permitted to cross-examine each witness in an attempt to dismiss, discredit, or disprove the witnesses statements.

Click here to see a videoclip of direct testimony from one of the Ohio State mock trials.

Defense Testimony - After the plaintiffs' case is presented, the defendants present their case in much the same way using witnesses and experts that present direct testimony, followed by cross examination by the plaintiffs' counsel.

Click here to see a videoclip of cross examination from one of the Ohio State mock trials.

Redirection and Recall - At the discretion of the judge, each witness can be redirected after cross examination by either the counsel. If critical information is not divulged during the initial testimony, counsel can request to recall a witness to the stand for additional questioning and cross examination.

Closing Arguments - Counsel for the plaintiffs and defense summarize their clients positions to remind the jurors of the facts presented in their case and to convince the jurors of veracity of their cause. Closing arguments are typically intended to be dramatic and pointed for effect.

Click here to see a videoclip of direct testimony from one of the Ohio State mock trials.

Explanation:

Answer:

B: The Articles

Explanation:

In the United states,state police power comes from the tenth amendment to the which gives states the right and powers not delegated to the United states.

The correct answer is option first: caused deaf and blind students of color who had been in the same classroom as white children but who had separate sleeping and eating quarters to be removed from the classroom."

Learn more about "Jim Crow" laws: https://brainly.com/question/22549874

#SPJ11

Class characteristics are important in a criminal trial because They are used to identify the physical and chemical properties of other evidence. Thus the correct option is C.

Evidence is referred to as proof based on factual information which helps to validate the occurrence of the event. It helps to determine whether the action took place or not by providing credentials.

The observable features of a sample that point to limited group sources refer to Class characteristics. These are characteristics of physical evidence that can only be attributed to a group and never to a single source.

Class evidence connects a category of individual citizens to a specific accused at a crime scene. When a suspect group doesn't meet the requirements set forth by the evidence, they can be eliminated.

Therefore, option C is appropriate.

Learn more about Evidence, here:

https://brainly.com/question/6764645

#SPJ2

Yes a person can belong to more than one culture. Multiple cultural identities may be encouraged or required by people's lived experiences, either freely or unintentionally.

More about Culture and identity:

Our feeling of cultural identity helps us feel connected. We seek out people whose worldviews, attitudes, and practises align with our own in order to build relationships and win their acceptance.

Global cultural variety and intergroup contact are growing as a result of modernization, migration, and interethnic/religious marriages. Many people may have ancestries that incorporate more than one cultural background as a result of this increased cultural contact.

Learn more about Culture and identity here:

https://brainly.com/question/5591199

#SPJ9

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Many European nations offer government services that are not offered in the United States. In order to do this, they require their citizens to pay higher taxes. The United States doesn't follow the same system because in Europe the governments invest in offering affordable services to the citizens, trying to consider the necessities of the poor. There are social programs aimed to facilitate health services and other services so much needed for the medium and low class.

In the United States, many services are seen as a business, Private companies offer the services but as a business to make a profit, not thinking about the necessities of less favored or poor. Depending on the political party in power, sometimes there are social programs to help the people, as in the case of the Democratic administration that raises more taxes to fund these programs. On the other hand, when the Republicans run the government, they do not like to raise more taxes to fund social programs. They think that people have to pay for the services they need.

Answer: • California's WMD training

• New York's requirement of 47 extra hours for firearm training

Explanation:

Some of the common requirements to both New York and California for security guards include:

• At least 18 years old.

• The person should be a citizen or a resident alien of United States.

• The person should not have been convicted of any serious criminal offense.

The difference in the New York's requirement for security guards and that of California is:

• California's WMD training

• New York's requirement of 47 extra hours for firearm training

The ADH at 28 hours for the 2nd instar is 756.

Accumulated degree hour (ADH) is the given amount of thermal energy which an egg-based animal or insect requires to develop from one stage to the next of its life, especially during the incubation period.

The formula for calculating ADH is given as:

ADH = Time (hrs.) X (Average temp. – Minimum development threshold temperature).

Number of hours for the egg to reach the first instar = 23 hours

Storage temperature of the eggs = 78 degrees Fahrenheit

Number of hours at the second instar = 28 hours

Assumed minimum development temperature threshold for eggs = 51 degrees Fahrenheit

ADH = Time (hrs.) X (Average temp. – Minimum development threshold temperature)

= 756 {28 x (78 - 51)}

Thus, the ADH at 28 hours for the 2nd instar is 756. Though, ordinarily, an egg requires 1,890 ADH (70 x 27) to grow from the first instar to the 2nd instar.

Learn more about instar development at https://brainly.com/question/11659006

The federal initiative that is designed to encourage organizations to address how critical operations will continue under a broad range of negative circumstances is:

D. COOP (Continuity of Operations).

COOP stands for Continuity of Operations. COOP is a federal initiative that aims to ensure that organizations can maintain essential functions and continue operations during and after various disruptive events, such as natural disasters, terrorist attacks, or other emergencies.

The purpose of COOP is to minimize downtime, mitigate risks, and enable organizations to quickly recover and resume critical operations in adverse conditions. It involves developing comprehensive plans, strategies, and procedures to address potential threats and disruptions, including backup systems, alternate work locations, and communication protocols.

Learn more about federal initiatives: https://brainly.com/question/28301283

#SPJ11

The principles of law that provide the basis for defining acts as criminal and the conditions required for successful prosecution are called criminal law.

Criminal law is a branch of law that deals with the regulation of conduct that is deemed harmful to society. Criminal law establishes the framework for identifying what constitutes a crime, the types of punishments that may be imposed on those found guilty of committing a crime, and the procedures that must be followed in the prosecution of a criminal case.
One of the key principles of criminal law is that an individual must have committed an act that is prohibited by law in order to be considered a criminal. This principle is known as the actus reus requirement. Additionally, criminal law requires that there must be a criminal intent, or mens rea, for an act to be considered a crime.
Successful prosecution of a criminal case requires that the prosecutor prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed the crime with the required criminal intent. The principles of criminal law play a crucial role in ensuring that justice is served and that society is protected from harmful behavior.

Learn more about law :

https://brainly.com/question/29553358

#SPJ11

Answer:

THANK YOU IF IT IS "A"....<3333

Explanation:

According to the passage, the correct option is A. The Patriot Act is essential to the United States' efforts to combat terrorism.

The passage states that the Patriot Act updated the law to reflect new technologies and new threats. The Act was reportedly used to look into the killing of Wall Street Journal writer Daniel Pearl, according to the document. This implies that the Patriot Act is a powerful weapon in the battle against terrorism in the author's eyes.

Therefore, the author of the passage would most likely agree with the statement that the Patriot Act is essential to the United States' efforts to combat terrorism. Hence, Option A. is correct.

Learn more about the Patriot Act, here:

https://brainly.com/question/11306077

#SPJ5

Answer:

The supreme law of the United States of America is the Constitution of America. The 1st and the 2nd amendment to the Constitution provided right to freedom and equality to all. It provided liberty to the people.

Explanation:

1. The application and the interpretation of the 1st amendment and the free exercise clauses to reflect an ongoing majoritarian practice of religion and the free exercise. This was during the case of Wisconsin v. Yoder

2. Efforts to balance the social order as well as the freedom of the individual are reflected by the interpretation of the 1st amendment which limits speech and includes place, manner regulation, time, defamatory, offensive statement, etc.

3. U.S. Supreme Court has held symbolic speech o be protected by the 1st amendment.

4. According to the 2nd amendment, the decision of the Supreme court rests upon the constitutional interpretation of the individual liberty.