At a soccer game Jimmy’s mom brought the team 25 apples and 50 oranges. How many apples are there to oranges if this were simplified? EXPLAIN!! WHOEVER GIVES GETS BRAINLEST!!

The compute Sn in terms of Hn, we need to change the order of summations. Given that Sn = ∑j=1n Hj = ∑j=1n ∑k=1j k^1, we can rearrange the order of summations to simplify the expression.

Starting with the double summation, ∑j=1n ∑k=1j k^1, we can rewrite it as a single summation:

∑j=1n ∑k=1j k^1 = ∑j=1n (1 + 2 + 3 + ... + j)
We can apply the formula for the sum of consecutive numbers, which is the arithmetic series formula:

1 + 2 + 3 + ... + j = j(j+1)/2
The double summation becomes:

∑j=1n ∑k=1j k^1 = ∑j=1n j(j+1)/2
Next, we simplify the expression:

∑j=1n j(j+1)/2 = 1/2 ∑j=1n j^2 + ∑j=1n j/2
Using the formula for the sum of squares, ∑j^2 = n(n+1)(2n+1)/6, and the formula for the sum of consecutive numbers, ∑j = n(n+1)/2, the expression becomes:

1/2 * n(n+1)(2n+1)/6 + n(n+1)/2
Simplifying further:

= n(n+1)(2n+1)/12 + 6n(n+1)/12
Combining the terms:

=\((n(n+1)(2n+1) + 6n(n+1))/12\)
= \((2n^3 + 3n^2 + n + 6n^2 + 6n)/12\)= (2n^3 + 9n^2 + 7n)/12
=\(n(2n^2 + 9n + 7)/12\)
Sn = n(2n^2 + 9n + 7)/12 in terms of Hn.

To know more about summations visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29334900

#SPJ11

The summation of Sn can be expressed simply as Hn.

To compute Sn in terms of Hn, we need to change the order of summations in the expression Sn = ∑j=1n ∑k=1j k^(-1).

Let's first examine the double summation term ∑k=1j k^(-1) for a fixed value of j. This term represents the sum of the reciprocals of the positive integers from 1 to j. This is a well-known harmonic series, which can be denoted as Hj. So, for each value of j, the inner sum is equal to Hj.

Now, to compute Sn, we need to sum up the values of Hj for j ranging from 1 to n. We can rewrite this as ∑j=1n Hj. By changing the order of summations, we can express this sum in a different form.

When we change the order of summations, the double summation becomes a single summation:

Sn = ∑j=1n Hj.

Learn more about summation

https://brainly.com/question/542712

#SPJ11

The candy bar A contains 261 calories and candy bar B contains 254 amount of calories.

What are the linear equations in two variables?

A linear equation in two variables is one that is written in the form ax + by + c=0, where a, b, and c are real numbers and the coefficients of x and y, i.e. a and b, are not equal to zero. For example, 10x+4y = 3 and -x+5y = 2 are two-variable linear equations.

Let candy bar A contains 'x' calories and candy bar B contains 'y' amount of calories.

Then by using the given data, we can prepare the equations as

                    x + 2y = 769 -----(I)

                  2x + y = 776 -------(II)

 Multiplying equation (II) by '2' and then taking subtraction, we get

                     -3x = -783

                        x = 261

Now put x = 261 in equation (I), we get

            261 + 2y = 769

                   2y = 508

                     y = 254.

Hence, the candy bar A contains 261 calories and candy bar B contains 254 amount of calories.

To learn more about linear equations, visit

brainly.com/question/24085666

#SPJ1

yesStep-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x^2+3x-28

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The answer is x^2  3x 28

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

16,500

Step-by-step explanation:

thats it

The true relative risk of the experimental medication lies between 1.17 and 3.53 with 95% certainty.

Generate a 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in proportions of participants reporting a reduction of symptoms between the experimental and placebo groups. The formula for the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in proportions of participants reporting a reduction of symptoms between the experimental and placebo groups is given by; CI = (p1 - p2) ± 1.96 * √ [(p1 * (1 - p1) / n1) + (p2 * (1 - p2) / n2)
Where;
p1 = the proportion of participants in the experimental group that reported a reduction of symptoms
p2 = the proportion of participants in the placebo group that reported a reduction of symptoms
n1 = the number of participants in the experimental group
n2 = the number of participants in the placebo group
Substitute the values into the formula.
p1 = 38/100 = 0.38
p2 = 21/100 = 0.21
n1 = n2 = 100
CI = (0.38 - 0.21) ± 1.96 * √ [(0.38 * (1 - 0.38) / 100) + (0.21 * (1 - 0.21) / 100)]
CI = 0.17 ± 1.96 * 0.079
CI = 0.17 ± 0.155
CI = (0.015, 0.325). Hence, the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in proportions of participants reporting a reduction of symptoms between the experimental and placebo groups is (0.015, 0.325).

Estimate the relative risk (RR) for reduction in symptoms between groups.
The formula for calculating the relative risk (RR) is given by;
RR = (a / (a + b)) / (c / (c + d))
Where;
a = number of participants who received the experimental medication and reported a reduction in symptoms
b = number of participants who received the experimental medication but did not report a reduction in symptoms
c = number of participants who received the placebo and reported a reduction in symptoms
d = number of participants who received the placebo but did not report a reduction in symptoms
Substitute the values into the formula.
a = 38
b = 62
c = 21
d = 79
RR = (38 / (38 + 62)) / (21 / (21 + 79))
RR = 0.38 / 0.21
RR = 1.81
Hence, the relative risk (RR) for reduction in symptoms between the experimental and placebo groups is 1.81.

Estimate the odds ratio (OR) for reduction in symptoms between groups.
The formula for calculating the odds ratio (OR) is given by;
OR = (a * d) / (b * c)
Substitute the values into the formula.
a = 38
b = 62
c = 21
d = 79
OR = (38 * 79) / (62 * 21)
OR = 1.44

Hence, the odds ratio (OR) for a reduction in symptoms between the experimental and placebo groups is 1.44. Generate a 95% confidence interval (CI) for the relative risk (RR).

The formula for calculating the standard error (SE) of the logarithm of the relative risk is given by;
SE = √ [(1 / a) - (1 / (a + b)) + (1 / c) - (1 / (c + d))]
The formula for calculating the confidence interval (CI) of the relative risk is given by; CI = e^(ln(RR) - 1.96 * SE) to e^(ln(RR) + 1.96 * SE)
Substitute the values into the formulas
SE = √ [(1 / 38) - (1 / (38 + 62)) + (1 / 21) - (1 / (21 + 79))]
SE = 0.283
CI = e^(ln(1.81) - 1.96 * 0.283) to e^(ln(1.81) + 1.96 * 0.283)
CI = 1.17 to 3.53

Hence, the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the relative risk (RR) is (1.17 to 3.53). The clinical trial was conducted to compare the effectiveness of an experimental medication to placebo in reducing the symptoms of asthma. The trial consisted of 200 participants who were randomly assigned to receive either the experimental medication or placebo. The primary outcome of the trial was a self-reported reduction of symptoms. Of the 100 participants who received the experimental medication, 38 reported a reduction in symptoms as compared to 21 participants who received the placebo. The results of the study were analyzed to generate a 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in proportions of participants reporting a reduction of symptoms between the experimental and placebo groups. The 95% CI was found to be (0.015, 0.325), which means that the true difference in proportions of participants reporting a reduction of symptoms between the experimental and placebo groups lies between 0.015 and 0.325 with 95% certainty. Hence, the experimental medication is statistically significant in reducing the symptoms of asthma compared to placebo. The relative risk (RR) was estimated to be 1.81, which indicates that the experimental medication is 1.81 times more effective in reducing the symptoms of asthma compared to placebo.

The odds ratio (OR) was estimated to be 1.44, which indicates that the odds of experiencing a reduction in symptoms in the experimental group were 1.44 times higher than the odds in the placebo group. A 95% CI for the relative risk (RR) was also generated, which was found to be (1.17 to 3.53). This means that the true relative risk of the experimental medication lies between 1.17 and 3.53 with 95% certainty. The clinical trial showed that the experimental medication is more effective in reducing the symptoms of asthma compared to the placebo.

To know more about asthma visit:

brainly.com/question/29626405

#SPJ11

Answer:

it's 2$ per guest

he needs 2$ for any guest

Using the binomial probability concept, the standard deviation of the number of people who suffer from insomnia is =24.21

What is binomial probability?

When an experiment or survey is repeated numerous times, the likelihood that the results will be SUCCESS or FAILURE is known as the binomial distribution. The prefix "bi" implies "two" or "twice," therefore the term "binomial" refers to a distribution type with two probable outcomes. A coin flip, for instance, can only result in one of two outcomes: heads or tails, and completing a test can result in either passing or failing.

standard deviation =\(\sqrt{n*p(1-p)}\)

p = probability of success = 6% = 0.06

1 - p = 1 - 0.06 = 0.94

Sample size, n = 10400

Substituting the values into the equation :

\(\sqrt{10400*0.06(1-0.04)}\)

\(\sqrt{10400*0.06(0.94)}\)

\(\sqrt{10400*0.0564}\)

\(\sqrt{586.56}\)

= 24.21  

Hence, the standard deviation is 24.21.

Learn more about binomial probability from the link below

https://brainly.com/question/12474772

#SPJ4

A large t-statistic indicates a greater difference between the sample means and provides stronger evidence for a significant difference between the populations.

The t-statistic is a measure of the difference between two sample means relative to the variability within the samples. When the population means are different, the difference between the sample means will tend to be larger, which will result in a larger numerator in the t-statistic formula. The larger the difference between the sample means, the greater the evidence for a difference between the populations. In contrast, if the population means are similar, the difference between the sample means will be smaller, resulting in a smaller numerator and a weaker test of significance.

The denominator of the t-statistic formula is the standard error of the mean, which measures the variability of sample means around the population mean. If the sample size is large enough, the standard error of the mean will be small, resulting in a smaller denominator and a larger t-statistic. Therefore, when the population means are different, a larger t-statistic would be expected due to a combination of a larger numerator and a smaller denominator.

In summary, If the population means are different, a large t-statistic would be expected.

Learn more about t-statistic

brainly.com/question/15236063

#SPJ11

Answer:

X- Intercepts: (-1,0) and (-3,0)

Y- Intercepts: (0,-6)

Vertex: (-2,2)

Maximum

Axis of Symmetry x=-2

I don't know what the roots/solutions/zeroes are

7. Domain: All real #

8. Range: y is less than or equal to 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Tell me if you need explanation

Answer:

Hi The Answer is A.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Answer is A Because of the funter travel of the X.

x*y=z

Hope This Helps.

:)

My name is John henry.

Given,In a certain animal species, P(male birth)=3/4For litters of size 4, we need to find the following probabilities: Probability of all being maleProbability of all being female.

Probability of exactly one being male Probability of exactly one being female Probability of two being male and two female Probabilities can be calculated using the binomial distribution formula as shown below:

P(x=k)=nCk pk qn−k

where,

n= sample size

k = number of successes

p = probability of success

q = 1-

p = probability of failureI)

Probability of all being male

P(all male)=P(4 males)=nCk pⁿ qⁿ⁻ᵏ=(⁴C₄) (³/₄)⁴ (¹/₄)⁰=1×81/256= 81/256II)

Probability of all being female

P(all female)=P(4 females)=nCk pⁿ qⁿ⁻ᵏ=(⁴C₀) (³/₄)⁰ (¹/₄)⁴=1×1/256= 1/256III)

Probability of exactly one being

maleP(exactly one male)=P(1 male and 3 females)+P(1 female and 3 males)= (⁴C₁) (³/₄)¹ (¹/₄)³ +(⁴C₁) (³/₄)³ (¹/₄)¹= 4×3/64 + 4×3/64= 3/8IV)

Probability of exactly one being female

P(exactly one female)=P(1 female and 3 males)= (⁴C₁) (³/₄)³ (¹/₄)¹= 4×3/64= 3/16V)

Probability of two being male and two female

P(two males and two females)=P(2 males)P(2 females)=(⁴C₂) (³/₄)² (¹/₄)²= 6×9/256= 54/256= 27/128

Therefore,Probability of all being

male = 81/256

Probability of all being

female = 1/256

Probability of exactly one being

male = 3/8

Probability of exactly one being

female = 3/16

Probability of two being male and two female = 27/128.

To know more about Probability visit :

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

The product of rational numbers can always be expressed as the ratio of two integers, where the denominator is not zero.

The product of rational numbers can always be written as a rational number. A rational number is defined as the quotient of two integers, where the denominator is not zero. When we multiply two rational numbers, we are essentially multiplying the numerators and denominators separately.

Let's consider two rational numbers, a/b and c/d, where a, b, c, and d are integers and b, d are not equal to zero. The product of these rational numbers is (a/b) * (c/d), which can be simplified as (a * c) / (b * d). Since multiplication of integers results in another integer, both the numerator and denominator are integers.

Furthermore, as long as the denominators b and d are not zero, the product remains a valid rational number.

For more such questions on rational numbers

https://brainly.com/question/19079438

#SPJ8

Answer:

Think

Step-by-step explanation:

4x - 6 + 2x = 18

You are solving for x so obviously you have to have your x variable on one side of the equal sign by itself.

So how do you do that? Combine the same calues together and seperate the rest

4x + 2x = 6x

6x = 18 + 6

6x = 24

x = 3

Practice practice practice. Simple stuff. You got this!

Answer:

A. x = 4

Step-by-step explanation:

To answer this question, we first have to combine like terms:

4x - 6 + 2x = 18

6x - 6 = 18

Now, we take away 6 from the left side and add it to the right side:

6x - 6 = 18

     +6   +6

6x = 24

Then, we isolate the variable:

6x = 24

/6     /6

x = 4

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

have a great day

god is great

Answer:

Scale factor is 1:16

Step-by-step explanation:

1.25 x 16 = 20

1.5 x 16 = 24

The image on the wall is 16 times bigger than the image on the slide,
that is why the ratio is 1:16

The store owner has sold 6 dozen eggs, and the selling price per dozen is approximately $3.90.

Let's solve this problem:

First, let's find the cost per dozen eggs.

The store owner bought a carton of eggs for $21.60.

We need to determine how many dozens are in this carton.

Let's assume there are "x" dozens of eggs in the carton.

Therefore, the cost per dozen eggs is $21.60 divided by "x".

Cost per dozen = $21.60 / x

Next, the store owner sells all but 6 dozen eggs at a profit of $0.30 per dozen. Let's assume the store owner sells "y" dozens of eggs.

The selling price per dozen eggs is the cost per dozen plus the profit per dozen.

Selling price per dozen = Cost per dozen + Profit per dozen

Selling price per dozen = $21.60 / x + $0.30

The owner sells y dozens, so the total selling price is y times the selling price per dozen:

\(Total $ selling price = y \times $ (Selling price per dozen)\)

\(Total $ selling price = y \times ($21.60 / x + $0.30)\)

The total selling price should equal the initial investment of $21.60:

Total selling price = $21.60

Therefore, we have the equation:

\(y \times ($21.60 / x + $0.30) = $21.60\)

Now, we can solve this equation to find the values of "y" and the selling price per dozen.

Simplifying the equation:

\(y \times ($21.60 / x + $0.30) = $21.60\)

\(21.60y / x + $0.30y = $21.60\)

We know that y = 6 (since the owner sells all but 6 dozen eggs), so we can substitute that value:

\(($21.60 \times 6) / x + $0.30 \times 6 = $21.60\)

\(129.60 / x + $1.80 = $21.60\)

Now, we can solve for "x":

$129.60 / x = $21.60 - $1.80

$129.60 / x = $19.80

To isolate "x", we can multiply both sides by "x":

$129.60 = $19.80x

Dividing both sides by $19.80:

x = $129.60 / $19.80

x ≈ 6.55

Since we're dealing with dozens of eggs, we round down the value of "x" to 6.

Therefore, the store owner bought 6 dozen eggs.

To find the selling price per dozen, we substitute the value of "x" into the equation:

Selling price per dozen = $21.60 / x + $0.30

Selling price per dozen = $21.60 / 6 + $0.30

Selling price per dozen ≈ $3.60 + $0.30

Selling price per dozen ≈ $3.90.

For similar question on selling price.

https://brainly.com/question/31211894

#SPJ11

The power of the test is low and not sufficient to detect a significant difference between the two treatments with the given sample size of 35.

To calculate the expected power of the test, we need to consider the survival rates, the significance level, and the sample size. Let's follow these steps:

Determine the proportions
Old treatment survival rate (p1) = 0.75
New treatment survival rate (p2) = 0.85

Determine the significance level
Two-sided significant difference level (α) = 0.05

Calculate the pooled proportion
Pooled proportion (p) = (p1 + p2) / 2 = (0.75 + 0.85) / 2 = 0.80

Calculate the standard error
Standard error (SE) = √(p × (1 - p) × (1/n1 + 1/n2)) = √(0.80 × (1 - 0.80) × (1/35 + 1/35)) ≈ 0.065

Calculate the test statistic (z)
z = (p2 - p1) / SE = (0.85 - 0.75) / 0.065 ≈ 1.54

Find the critical value for the two-sided significant difference at the 5% level
z_critical = 1.96 (from a standard normal distribution table)

Calculate the power of the test
In this case, since the test statistic is smaller than the critical value (1.54 < 1.96), we cannot reject the null hypothesis at the 5% significance level.
for such more question on sample size

https://brainly.com/question/20166137

#SPJ11

Answer:

2.50c + 3.25p = 15

Step-by-step explanation:

2.50 times the number of bags of chips bought equals the total cost of chips bought.

3.25 times the number of bags of pretzels bought equals the total cost of pretzels bought.

Added together equals the total amount of money Teresa spent on chips AND pretzels. The question tells us that the total amount of money equals $15. So the equation would be: 2.50c + 3.25p = 15

(cost of chips)(number of bags of chips) + (cost of pretzels)(number of bags of pretzels) = amount spent

Answer:

They can all be functions so either the question is bad or information is missing

The linear function f is y = f(x) = (-3/2)x+b, with f(-9) = 10 and f(-1)=-2.

The value of the steepness or the direction of a line in a coordinate plane is known as the slope of a line, often known as the gradient. Given the equation of a line or the coordinates of points situated on the straight line, slope can be determined using a variety of techniques.

The formula for slope between two points (x₁, y₁) and (x₂, y₂) is,

m = (y₂ - y₁)/(x₂ - x₁)

The given values are,

f(-9) = 10 and f(-1) = -2.

The given  coordinates are (-9, 10)  and (-1, -2)

Let the linear function is,

y= mx+b    (1)    

To find the linear function,

Find the slope

m = -2 - 10 / -1 - (-9)

m = -12 / 8

m = -3 / 2.

Substitute the value of m in equation (1),

y=(-3/2)x+b

To find the value of b, substitute y = -2,

-2=(-3/2)(-1)+b

b=-7/2

The required linear function is,

y=(-3/2)x -7/2

To know more about Slope on:

https://brainly.com/question/16941905

#SPJ1

Answer:

14.4

Step-by-step explanation:

We have hypotenuse so cannot use tangent. We have adjacent so we can't use sine, therefore, we have to use cosine.

x = cos(59) x 28

x = 14.4

Answer:

7.28 units

Step-by-step explanation:

Given two points

The distance found using distance formula:

d = √(x2-x1)² + (y2-y1)²

Distance is 7.28 units

Answer:

Yes, the sides form a right triangle.

Step-by-step explanation:

Pythagorean Theorem:

a² + b² = c²

↓

20² + 21² = 29²

║a² = 20² = 400

║b² = 21² = 441

║c² = 29² = 841

↓

400 + 441 = 841

║This equation is true.

↓

Yes, the sides form a right triangle.

Answer:

can u translate to English?

Step-by-step explanation:

thx

The values of Z such that e² = 2 + i√3 are Z = ln(2 + i√3) + 2πik, where k is an integer.

To find the values of Z, we can start by expressing 2 + i√3 in polar form. Let's denote it as re^(iθ), where r is the modulus and θ is the argument.

Given: 2 + i√3

To find r, we can use the modulus formula:

r = sqrt(a^2 + b^2)

= sqrt(2^2 + (√3)^2)

= sqrt(4 + 3)

= sqrt(7)

To find θ, we can use the argument formula:

θ = arctan(b/a)

= arctan(√3/2)

= π/3

So, we can express 2 + i√3 as sqrt(7)e^(iπ/3).

Now, we can find the values of Z by taking the natural logarithm (ln) of sqrt(7)e^(iπ/3) and adding 2πik, where k is an integer. This is due to the periodicity of the logarithmic function.

ln(sqrt(7)e^(iπ/3)) = ln(sqrt(7)) + i(π/3) + 2πik

Therefore, the values of Z are:

Z = ln(2 + i√3) + 2πik, where k is an integer.

The values of Z such that e² = 2 + i√3 are Z = ln(2 + i√3) + 2πik, where k is an integer.

To know more about polar form visit

https://brainly.com/question/30824428

#SPJ11

Answer:

area of a triangle =1/2 x b x h

which is half base x hieght

The equity beta for a firm is 0.944.

Equity Beta:

Equity Beta measures the volatility of the stock to the market, i.e., how sensitive is the stock price to a change in the overall market. It compares the volatility associated with the change in the prices of a security.

The formula to calculate equity beta:

Equity beta = Asset beta ( 1 + D/E( 1 - Tax))

Asset beta = 0.8

D/E = 0.3

Tax rate = 40%

Equity beta =  0.8 ( 1 + 0.3( 1- 40/100))

                   = 0.8 ( 1 + 0.3 × 6/10)

                   = 0.8 ( 1 + 0.18)

                   = 0.8 × 1.18

                   =0.944

Therefore the equity beta is 0.944.

To know more about the equity beta refer to the link given below:

https://brainly.com/question/23926595

#SPJ4

Answer:

12 days

Step-by-step explanation:

As, After 4 days, remaining chairs = 480

So, the number of chairs already installed = 720-480 = 240

In 4 days they constructed = 240

In 1 day =240/4 = 60

So in 1 day = 60

So in "x" day = 720

So = 720/60

= 12

= 12 days