The process of collecting, preserving, and analyzing evidence at a crime scene is called forensic investigation. The process involves identifying, preserving, analyzing, and documenting evidence.
The collection of evidence should be detailed enough to include as many relevant clues as possible but at the same time, sufficiently selective not to hinder the laboratory analysis.
Evidence always keeps up the quality when preserved in its initial condition as it was obtained from the crime scene. Whenever evidence is submitted in the court as an exhibit, the officials should establish the continuity of possessions of the evidence, which in legal terms is known as the chain of custody.
In your case, you would collect the glass with red liquid and yellow fiber on the edge lying on the ground and a smudged fingerprint crossing the center of the glass. You would preserve each piece of evidence separately to avoid contamination. You would analyze each piece of evidence separately to find out what happened at the crime scene. The glass could be analyzed for fingerprints or DNA. The red liquid could be analyzed for blood or other substances. The yellow fiber could be analyzed for its composition or origin.
The glass and red liquid are individual evidence because they can be traced back to a single source. The fingerprint and yellow fiber are class evidence because they cannot be traced back to a single source.
Learn more about the chain of custody:
https://brainly.com/question/28699126.
#SPJ11
A popular saying is that “a broken clock is right twice a day.” What would be an accurate description of this broken clock as a source of information?
sometimes reliable, but not valid
sometimes valid, but not reliable
neither valid not reliable
sometimes reliable and sometimes valid
If you park your car with a parking garage company and they provide you with a ticket stating that they are not responsible for any damage done to your vehicle can you still sue the company if one of the employees sat on your car and caused damages?
the office of student conduct and conflict resolution (osccr) punishes students who violate the academic integrity policy.
a. true
b. false
Students who disregard the academic integrity policy are disciplined by the office of student conduct and conflict resolution. This statement is true.
The Office of Student Conduct and Conflict Resolution (OSCCR) is responsible for upholding and enforcing the academic integrity policy at many colleges and universities.
This office investigates and resolves cases of academic misconduct, such as plagiarism or cheating on exams. If a student is found to have violated the academic integrity policy, they may face disciplinary action such as failing the assignment or course, probation, or expulsion.
The specific punishments vary depending on the institution and the severity of the violation.
To learn more about academic integrity policy
https://brainly.com/question/29744195
#SPJ4
The office of student conduct and conflict resolution will sanction any students who fail to abide by the academic integrity policy. This assertion is accurate.
Hence, the following statement is true.
Academic integrity is the duty and commitment on the part of both teachers and students to uphold just and ethical behaviour, which includes total honesty, fairness, and respect in all aspects of teaching, learning, and the pursuit of knowledge.
At many colleges and universities, the Office of Student Conduct and Conflict Resolution (OSCCR) is in charge of upholding and enforcing the academic integrity policy.
Cases of academic misconduct, such as plagiarism or exam cheating, are looked into and resolved by this office. If it is determined that a student has broken the academic integrity rules, they may be subject to punishments including failing the assignment or the course, probation, or expulsion.
Depending on the institution and the seriousness of the infringement, different penalties are applied.
For more questions on academic integrity policy
https://brainly.com/question/29744195
#SPJ4
If your mp3 player is stolen from your apartment, what type of insurance would it be covered under?.
The type of insurance which a stolen mp3 music player would be covered under is Renter's insurance.
What is Insurance?
This refers to the financial coverage for a product or item that a premium is paid for in the eventuality of any unfortunate thing happening to the thing or person.
Hence, we can note that in the case of an mp3 music player being stolen from a house apartment, it would be covered under renter's insurance because it is the property of the owner and is already insured against theft.
Read more about insurance here:
https://brainly.com/question/25855858
Countries in which people blindly obey the orders of their superiors have a high:
A. Uncertainty avoidance
B. Masculinity index
C. Power distance
D. Individualism index
Countries in which people blindly obey the orders of their superiors have a high power distance.
Power distance refers to the extent to which less powerful members of society accept and expect unequal distributions of power. In societies with high power distance, there is a significant gap between those who have power and those who do not. People in high power distance societies may be more likely to blindly obey authority figures without questioning their decisions or actions. This can have an impact on the way organizations are structured and how decisions are made within those organizations. It can also affect communication styles and the way individuals interact with one another in those societies.
Know more about power distance here:
https://brainly.com/question/30552484
#SPJ11
when the executive branch and its agencies translate laws into routine procedures and practices, this is called
Answer: Federal administrative law
Explanation:
Law is always enforced by the state in the society it operates
Law is always enforced by the state in the society it operates
in a two (2) paragraphs write what you understand about the the territorial power and how can it help to impose security in a establishment.
Based on socio-political and security concepts, territorial power can help to impose security in an establishment by assisting the establishment to function and move legitimate goods in relative freedom within the country and across its borders.
What is Territorial Power?Territorial Power is a term that is used to describe the power which a government or establishment has over a particular area. This power helps the establishment govern and protect the place against internal and external influence.
Territorial power can help impose security in an establishment because they will be able to exercise the power to station security personnel and defend against any form of invasion or robbery.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the use of territorial power is essential for establishments to provide adequate security for themselves.
Learn more about Territorial power here: https://brainly.com/question/13664169
#SPJ1
Why is fingerprint analysis not accurate in crime?
Answer:
It is only accurate if the criminal is already in the police database.
Explanation:
The print is matched with a fingerprint that is already in the system.
No one disputes that fingerprinting is a valuable and generally reliable police tool, but despite more than a century of use, fingerprinting has never been scientifically validated. This is significant because of the criteria governing the admission of scientific evidence in the US courts. Latent fingerprints, which are collected from crime scenes, have been used as courtroom evidence for decades. ... But there is little certainty that a set of fingerprints can reliably point to the right person, according to the report.
Which of the following is not a step in formal rule making?
A.Publication in Federal Register
B.Formal hearing with a transcript
C.Publication of findings
D.Written comments by the public
The statement that is not a step in formal rule making is D.Written comments by the public.
What formal rule making?Rule consistency is described as the accuracy with which rules are implemented to individuals and groups, whereas rule formalization is concerned with how thoroughly organizational rules are documented.
The federal Administrative Procedures Act (APA) establishes two distinct processes for the creation of administrative rules: formal rulemaking, which calls for an on-the-record hearing and the presentation of evidence, much like a court proceeding; and informal rulemaking, which calls for notice to the public and an opportunity for comment on the proposed rule.
Therefore, option D is correct.
Learn more about rule at:
https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ1
100 POINTS TO BEST ANSWER!!! why the heck does chool matter? my aunt got taken out of elementary school, she skipped to college years later and is now a doctor. my second question is why do we haver to learn about history? my S.S. teacher gave me a right answer wrong on accident and she said, "whats in the past is in the past". somethings not right here...
Answer:
History is important, even if it seems useless- It's good to know about what happened in our past. It teaches us, trains us, and gives us ideas. Sometime in our lives theres going to be a time where we will share something we learned from History.
Explanation:
Answer:
The system is dirty
Explanation:
Your aunt is older so back in the day everything got slipped back better.
Justin wants to file a suit against mikayla. for a court to hear the case a. the court must issue a deposition. b. the court must have jurisdiction. c. the parties must own property. d. mikayla must agree.
Answer: B
Explanation:
The model of criminal justice that is focused on protecting defendants’ rights is known as the ______ model.
Answer:
the due process model
Explanation:
hope this helps :)
Answer:process
Explanation:
Normally, both parties to a contract are discharged when they have completely performed their contractual
obligations.
True
False
It should be noted that in contract law, a discharge will take place when the parties that are involved have fully performed their duties. Therefore, it's true.
Discharge of a contract simply takes place when the main obligations of a contract end. It should be noted that the ending of the contract entails the termination of the contractual relationship.
Both parties to a contract are discharged when they have completely performed their contractual obligations. Therefore, the operation of law releases the parties from performance.
Learn more about contracts on:
https://brainly.com/question/25820002
What is equality of Nations, Nationalities and Peoples?
Answer:
The Nations, Nationalities and Peoples' Day affirms the necessity of respect for the fundamental rights of individuals and of the nations and nationalities of the country as well as the development of the country's various cultures and religions.
Explanation:
Hope this helps
If a state were to have the majority of its productive capacity in the public sector, this would most likely indicate the existence of a(n):
Answer: D. social market system.
Explanation:
I'm a social market system, the economy runs as an amalgamation of two economic policies being the capitalist system and the socialist system.
The goal of this is to improve the welfare of humans whilst still encouraging competition. As a result, most of the country's productive sector will be in the public sector where the government tries to institute it's ideals of trying to improve the general welfare of the people.
Which of the following statements is true about the early development of English common law? A. English common law is considered civil law. B. English common law is based on French law. C. Rather than inquire into the merits of the case, the chancery court emphasized legal procedure. D. Decisions of the law courts took precedence over those of the Court of Chancery. E. Equitable orders and remedies of the Court of Chancery took precedence over the legal decisions and remedies of the law courts.
E. Equitable orders and remedies of the Court of Chancery took precedence over the legal decisions and remedies of the law courts.
In the early development of English common law, the Court of Chancery played a significant role in administering equitable justice. While the law courts focused on the application of legal principles and remedies, the Court of Chancery emphasized fairness, flexibility, and remedies based on equity. Equitable orders and remedies from the Court of Chancery were considered to have precedence over the legal decisions and remedies of the law courts. This distinction between legal and equitable jurisdictions was an important feature of the early English legal system.
learn more about Chancery here
https://brainly.com/question/31670102
#SPJ11
Which of the following are the main concerns of U.S. energy policy today as evidenced by President Obama's 2015 Clean Power Plan?reducing carbon emissions
development of renewable energy technologies
The main concerns of U.S. energy policy today, as evidenced by President Obama's 2015 Clean Power Plan, are reducing carbon emissions and promoting the development of renewable energy technologies.
The Clean Power Plan was a major initiative aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions from power plants, which are one of the largest sources of carbon pollution in the United States. The plan set specific emissions reduction targets for each state and encouraged the adoption of renewable energy technologies such as wind and solar power. The goal of the plan was to transition the country towards a cleaner, more sustainable energy future while also reducing the impacts of climate change.
To know more about carbon emissions click here:
brainly.com/question/30431807
#SPJ4
Joe enters into a contract with Harry only because of Harry's threats. Later, Joe refuses to perform, claiming that he entered into the contract under duress. Harry sues to enforce the contract. To be found guilty of duress, Harry must have threatened a. Joe with a wrongful act. b. Joe with an illegal act. c. Joe with deadly force. d. to file a civil suit against Joe. e. either A or B.
Answer:
B. joe with an illegal act
To be found guilty of duress, Harry must have threatened Joe with a wrongful act. Thus the correct option is A.
What is a Contract?An agreement signed between two individuals based on mutual consent where both parties are getting something in return when enforceable by law is said to be a contract.
In the given case, it states that Joe enters into a contract with Harry because harry forces him to do so. Later jow refuses to perform the contract by stating that he entered under duress in the contract.
In the given case, To be found guilty of duress, Harry must have threatened Jow with a wrongful act as forcing someone to be part of the contract is said to be a wrongful act where the willingness of an individual is absent.
Therefore, option A is appropriate.
Learn more about Contract, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ2
First Offense DWI in Texas can result in ______________.
Answer:
DWI 1st Offense: A first offense DWI is a Class B misdemeanor. A conviction carries a maximum fine of $2,000 as well as a jail sentence of up to 180 days. ... A first offense conviction will also lead to a license renewal surcharge of up to $2,000 per year for three years.
Explanation:
First Offense DWI in Texas can result in a fine and an imprisonment of up to 180 days.
What is the significance of a First Offense DWI?The First Offense DWI can be referred to or considered as an offense in which the convicted person is held guilty of a crime that is punishable with fine as well as an imprisonment. The fine is limited, and the imprisonment is also normal.
The amount of fine for an individual held in a First Offense DWI is up to $2,000; whereas, an imprisonment or a jail sentence for such act may be limited up to a maximum period of 180 days. Such crimes typically have a strict punishment in first conviction in Texas, so that the person convicted is aware of the consequences of second conviction.
Therefore, the significance of a First Offense DWI has been aforementioned.
Learn more about First Offense DWI here:
https://brainly.com/question/27369536
#SPJ2
Identify the true statements about the relationship between Congress and the interstate commerce of the United States. a. The power of Congress over commerce is very broad; it extends to all interstate commerce, be it great or small.b. The persons engaged in interstate commerce as well as the activities affecting it are regulated by Congress.
Answer:
Both statements are true regarding the relationship between Congress and the interstate commerce of the United States.
Explanation:
A. The power of Congress over commerce is indeed very broad and extends to all forms of interstate commerce, regardless of scale or magnitude. This authority is derived from the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, which grants Congress the power to regulate commerce among the states.
B. Congress has the authority to regulate not only the activities directly involved in interstate commerce but also the individuals or entities engaged in such commerce. This includes regulating various aspects related to interstate trade, such as transportation, communication, trade practices, and market competition.
How does our desire to make money impact the process of promoting change?
The desire to make money can impact the process of promoting change by making people invest more in innovation.
How can change come ?The pursuit of profit has the potential to act as a driving force for both individuals and organizations seeking innovation and change. In this way, increased economic growth and competitive advantage may be attained through the exploration of fresh concepts and technologies that offer opportunities previously inaccessible.
For instance, companies may begin investing in renewable resources or sustainable commodities due to mounting consumer demand as well as market trends, while entrepreneurs may put forth their best efforts in devising new products or services geared towards addressing pressing environmental and social challenges.
Find out more on promoting change at https://brainly.com/question/29779909
#SPJ1
do you think the spread of the pandemic has led to fundamental human rights being compromised by our law enforcement officials
Answer:
The corona virus pandemic is intensifying pressure
across a wide range of fundamental rights, a key
pillar of the rule of law. This comes at a time when,
according to the World Justice Project Rule of Law Index,
more countries have declined in their fundamental
rights score than any other rule of law factor both over
the last year and the last five years.
Explanation:
In addition to the dramatic effects of quarantines and lockdowns on freedom of movement
and travel, the pandemic is affecting human rights in four areas of particular concern. First, the
crisis is triggering some state responses that are discriminatory and unequal in their effects
on certain minority or vulnerable groups. Second, excessive infringements on core political
and civil rights of freedom of expression and peaceful assembly are evident. Third, the public health requirements surrounding contact tracing in the digital age raise special concerns
regarding the right to privacy. And fourth, the unique impact of the pandemic and related
controls on prisoners and others involved in the criminal justice system demand special handling from a rights-based perspective. In all four of these areas, protecting fundamental rights
in accordance with international rule of law standards not only serves justice but also helps
contain the spread of the pandemic itself.
human Rights Abuses in the Enforcement of Coronavirus Security Measures
“This virus is no respecter of persons.” Corona virus is a pandemic of global proportions which some have termed the third world war.[ii] Due to the pandemic, quarantine measures have been put in place across the globe. While typically restriction of movement of free people would fall under a human rights violation, there is an exception for threats to a nation that pandemics fall under. Nonetheless this exception does not cover the human rights violations in the enforcement of quarantine measures which have been brought to light around the globe. This abusive policing is not new, but the media coverage in most cases is. In response, the U.N. in a resolution about the Corona virus pandemic should include recommendations that address these abuses.
A "qui tam" court case can proceed to court only if:
A private citizen has, or can arrange to have, adequate resources for pursuing the claim
The government grants its approval for the lawsuit to proceed
The government first refuses to pursue the case on its own initiative
The government and the private citizen reach a joint agreement concerning the sharing of winnings and costs of litigation
A "qui tam" court case c can continue to court provided that a private citizen has or can organize to have sufficient assets for chasing after the claim.
The option (A) is correct.
In qui tam cases, the private citizen acts as a whistleblower and brings the lawsuit on behalf of the government. The citizen must have the financial means or be able to arrange for resources to pursue the claim, as they are responsible for initiating and pursuing the case.
However, it's important to note that the government's approval is also typically required for the lawsuit to proceed, as the government has the option to intervene and take over the case if it deems it necessary.
Learn more about qui tam:
https://brainly.com/question/32312974
#SPJ4
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:
A "qui tam" court case can proceed to court only if:
(A) A private citizen has, or can arrange to have, adequate resources for pursuing the claim
(B) The government grants its approval for the lawsuit to proceed
(C) The government first refuses to pursue the case on its own initiative
(D) The government and the private citizen reach a joint agreement concerning the sharing of winnings and costs of litigation
the rainy day fund is more properly known as the national research university fund.
T/F
The statement is False as The rainy day fund and the national research university fund are two separate funds with different purposes.
What is the reason?The rainy day fund is a state-level reserve fund set up to help address unexpected budget shortfalls or emergencies. On the other hand, the national research university fund is a higher education funding program aimed at promoting research and innovation at Texas universities.
While both funds are important for the state of Texas, they serve different purposes and should not be confused with each other.
It is important for policymakers and the public to understand the distinctions between various government funds and programs to ensure effective allocation of resources and efficient governance.
To know more on Funds visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30074776
#SPJ11
If i moved to a new state at age 18 and had nothing for that state im moving to, hwhat is required to get that states I.D. and residency? Could i use any out of state I.D. info to get these?
To obtain a new state ID and establish residency, you typically need to provide proof of identity and residency (such as a lease agreement or utility bill), and a social security number or equivalent documentation.
To acquire a new state ID and establish residency, you will generally need to visit the local Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) or equivalent agency and present documentation. The requirements vary by state, but common requirements include proof of identity (such as a birth certificate or passport), proof of residency (such as a lease agreement or utility bill in your name), and a social security number or an equivalent document.
Using an out-of-state ID for identification purposes might not be sufficient, as the new state typically requires proof of residency within its jurisdiction to issue an ID card. It is advisable to research the specific requirements of the state you are moving to in order to ensure compliance.
Learn more about state ID: https://brainly.com/question/28902967
#SPJ11
the u.s. supreme court has held that trial judges must give juries a strict definition of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. true of false
It is true to say that the U.S. Supreme court has held that trial judges must give juries a strict definition of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
The Supreme Court said on Monday that a choice last term holding that the Constitution requires consistent jury decisions for state criminal preliminaries doesn't matter retroactively.
The decision is a misfortune for Thedrick Edwards and many others in Oregon, Louisiana and Puerto Rico, purviews that permitted non-consistent decisions under the steady gaze of the High Court's choice last year in Ramos v. Louisiana.
The 6-3 greater part choice was written by Equity Brett Kavanaugh, who was joined by the court's other moderate individuals.
In her contradiction, Equity Elena Kagan, joined by the court's other two liberal individuals, composed that last year's choice "accompanies a commitment, or in any event."
"On the off chance that the right to a consistent jury is so key - in the event that a decision delivered by a partitioned jury is 'no decision by any means' - then Thedrick Edwards shouldn't consume his time on earth in the slammer more than two hearers' resistance. I consciously disagree," she composed.
To know more about court,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/29786682
#SPJ4
why does winthrop believe that a bill of rights is essential in the constitution? click here to review the full primary source excerpt from the textbook.
Winthrop believes that a Bill of Rights is essential in the Constitution because the past has demonstrated that rulers tend to take advantage of the people under their rule.
The first ten amendments which is to the U.S. Constitution are called as the Bill of Rights. So, these laws are said to be based partly on the Magna Carta which is signed under King John of England in 1215.
However, the past was seen to demonstrate that the rulers tend to take advantage of the people under their rule. So it is quite essential that a Bill of rights be added to the Constitution in order to protect individual liberties of the citizens.
Hence, the Bill of Rights guaranteed the individual rights.
To learn more about the Bill of Rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/922814
#SPJ4
if the mails or other means of interstate commerce are used to offer securities, then the securities act of 1933 requires that:
If the mails or other means of interstate commerce are used to offer securities, then the Securities Act of 1933 requires that the securities being offered must be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), unless they are exempt from registration.
The Securities Act of 1933 is a federal law that regulates the sale of securities in the United States. Its purpose is to ensure that investors are provided with sufficient information about securities being offered for sale so they can make informed investment decisions.
The act requires companies that offer securities for sale to the public to provide detailed financial and other information about the securities, the company, and its management.
Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 prohibits the offer or sale of any security through the use of the mails or other means of interstate commerce unless a registration statement has been filed with the SEC or an exemption from registration applies.
The registration statement must contain detailed information about the securities being offered, the company, and its management, among other things.
By requiring securities to be registered with the SEC, the Securities Act of 1933 aims to ensure that investors have access to complete and accurate information about the securities they are considering purchasing. This promotes transparency and helps prevent fraudulent or misleading practices in the securities market.
To know more about Securities Act refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/31227421
#SPJ11
An arrest is considered a seizure under the what amendment
Answer:
A seizure of a person, within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment, occurs when the police's conduct would communicate to a reasonable person, taking into account the circumstances surrounding the encounter, that the person is not free to ignore the police presence and leave at his will.
Explanation: