Artwork in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries can be ________.

Answer:

Lines 11-12

Lines 24-25

Line 15

Answer:

In Ira Sher's, “The Man in the Well”, a group of children find a man in a well and decide to not retrieve help to get him out. None of these children helped the man in the well because they felt they had the power over his life, and getting help would take that power away.

sorry if this isn't correct :)

Answer:

The Three Appeals of Argument

Aristotle postulated three argumentative appeals: logical, ethical, and emotional. Strong

arguments have a balance of all of three, though logical (logos) is essential for a strong,

valid argument. Appeals, however, can also be misused, creating arguments that are not

credible.

Logical Appeal (logos)

Logical appeal is the strategic use of logic, claims, and evidence to convince an audience of

a certain point.

When used correctly, logical appeal contains the following elements...

 Strong, clear claims

 Reasonable qualifiers for claims

 Warrants that are valid

 Clear reasons for claims

 Strong evidence (facts, statistics, personal experience, expert authority, interviews,

observations, anecdotes)

 Acknowledgement of the opposition

When used poorly, logical appeals may include..

 Over-generalized claims

 Reasons that are not fully explained or supported

 Logical fallacies

 Evidence misused or ignored

 No recognition of opposing views

Answer:

Three argumentative appeals: logical, ethical, and emotional.

Explanation:

Answer:

Lennie goes to the barn to see his puppy when everyone else goes into town. Crooks does not want to let him in but finally does. Crooks tries to make Lennie understand how lonely he is by asking him how he would feel if George never came back from town.

Explanation:

Just summarized it

Answer:

A. Yhi and Izanagi both return to the sky where they live.

Explanation:

Took the test.

Answer: Both Dwight Okita and Sandra Cisnero write about how cultural heritage and physical appearances do not determine what it means to be American, so both authors establish about the topic of American identity.

Explanation: Just answered the question and came to this conclusion.

You should choose a song that talks about living with difficulties and trying to overcome them at all times.

By choosing a sad song that talks about life with difficulties, you can express the main feeling that the reader has when reading "Blood Family," since the book shows the characters in very difficult, sad, and hopeless lives.

Some examples of music you can use are “Let It Be” by The Beatles, “Smile” by Charlie Chaplin, and “Bridge Over Troubled Water” by Paul Simon and Art Garfunkel.

Learn more about music:

https://brainly.com/question/29521345

#SPJ1

Answer:

Is this for English 2 honors? I just did this

Explanation:

Answer:

Leading

Explanation:

The word tangent in this sentence automatically makes me think of the word leading. Based on the actual definition:

Tangent = "a straight line or plane that touches a curve or curved surface at a point, but if extended does not cross it at that point. "

This eliminates the first answer since it's "straight." The second and third answer choices don't make sense in the given statement, leaving you with, leading, as your final answer.

The phrase "consistently with his dignity" (line 37) in the context of the sentence in which it occurs points out (A) the conflict between decorum and thoroughness for the historian.

The phrase "consistently with his dignity" appears in the passage that discusses the qualities required for a historian to produce a successful work. The author argues that a historian must possess a high level of professionalism and objectivity, which includes being impartial and factual. The phrase "consistently with his dignity" is used to emphasize the importance of maintaining a sense of decorum and professionalism in the historian's work.

Overall, the phrase "consistently with his dignity" highlights the importance of professionalism and decorum in the work of a historian. It reminds us that historians must present their work with a level of respectability and maintain a sense of impartiality, even when discussing difficult or controversial topics. The phrase suggests that the historian's expertise and professionalism are essential to producing a successful and credible work.

To know more about phrase visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/1445699

#SPJ11

He never have me a penny......

Answer:

b dreams hsbskvdjdbdhdvdjdbdjdj

To provide a long paragraph answer to your question, there are several factors that can lend credibility to an article. In this particular case, the author's bias toward the victims of the genocide can actually lend credibility as it shows that the author has a clear perspective and is not trying to hide their stance on the issue. Additionally, by explaining the source of tension between rival groups, the author is providing background information that can help readers understand the context of the article. This can also lend credibility to the author's argument as they are providing evidence to support their claims. Overall, the combination of the author's bias and their explanation of the source of tension can lend credibility to the article as it shows that the author has done their research and is presenting their argument in a clear and well-supported manner.
Hi! In assessing an article's credibility, there are several factors to consider. A key element that lends credibility is the author's explanation of the source of tension between rival groups. By providing context and background information, the author helps readers understand the reasons behind the conflict, which demonstrates a thorough understanding of the topic. Additionally, while the author may reveal a bias towards the victims of the genocide, acknowledging this perspective allows readers to be aware of any potential bias and evaluate the information accordingly. It's important to consider both aspects when determining the credibility of an article.

To know more about visit:-

#SPJ11

Answer: C. The students traveled to the Faroe Islands to begin an intensive language study.

Explanation: This sentence is capitalized correctly because the only proper noun is "Faroe Islands" which is capitalized correctly.

Answer:

long-lasting

Explanation:

Answer:

A. Long-lasting

Answer:

Try to keep yourself busy. Remeber being sick is NO fun at all. Enjoy your health go outside and get some sunshine. maybe read a book, go for a walk. Dont wish yourself sickness. Because if you were VERY sick you would wish you werent sick.

Try to be happy

Explanation:

Answer:

eat very expired food or eat a bad combination of food i have done that before on accident

Explanation:

In Act II of The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet, Friar Laurence serves as a confidant, advisor, and go-between for Romeo and Juliet.

He supports their desire to get married and attempts to guide them through the complications of their forbidden love. He also acts as a moral compass, trying to guide them in the correct direction and keep them from making hasty decisions on their own. In Romeo and Juliet's Act 2, Scene 3, Friar Laurence responds to Romeo with disbelief. He had seen Romeo's complete dejection at being rejected by Rosaline, just like Romeo's companions have. The Friar is shocked by Romeo's quick shift when he informs him that he now wants to wed Juliet, whom he has just met.

To know more about Juliet's refer :

brainly.com/question/30459348

#SPJ4

It was important that Cuff discovered the Confederate spy as this will protect the tactical strategies of his army's own group from being discovered by the opposition.

The discovery was important because it will prevent the Union Army from being taken unawares in the course of the battle. This story is about the role of people like Emma and Cuff in the Civil War.

These people worked hard to protect the interest of the Union Army. The discoveries by the spies were important to the overall success of the Union Army which wanted the unity of the country.

Learn more about Behind Rebel Lines here:

https://brainly.com/question/12726548

#SPJ1

In the book, "Behind the Rebel Lines",  it is important that Cuff discovered the Confederate spy because the Union did not know the dealer was a Confederate spy.

"Behind the Rebel Lines", a book authored by Emma Edmonds about her life in the Union army during the American Civil War of 1861-1865.

Emma disguised herself as a man named Franklin Thompson to join the Union Army. She worked as a nurse, and a spy who gathered information from the Confederate so the Union could be prepared and defeat the rebels.

She used various ways to disguise herself during her spy missions. For instance, she disguised herself as a black slave with the name 'Cuff', a middle-aged Irish woman Bridget O'Shea,  etc. to achieve her goals.

Learn more about Emma Edmonds at brainly.com/question/17237281.

#SPJ1

Answer:

This is a very simple question, the first is the future tense(which are things we are going to do in the future) and the last is present tense(which are things we do in the present)

1. A

2. B

Answer:

B) The forest was dense and think, and Charlie and Kiana had trouble navigating the mysterious glimmering fog that covered the ground like a blanket.

Explanation:

A) begins with a dialogue, C) begins with telling you that what ends up happening is cool, D) begins by telling you somethin interesting about one of the characters.

B) Does none of those things and does not get the reader's attention and is not an effective opening line.

Answer: d. When Kiana imagined her ideal pet, a giant scaly fire-breathing dragon wasn't what she had in mind.

Explanation: the dragon was friendly not "scarly"

From the excerpt given, it is right to infer that Wilkie considers his brother Braddon to be a "Strong leader" (Option A)

Looking at the excerpt on the surface, one would think he means that Braddon loves bad movies. However, to be a suc. ker at something means to be unable to tell its real value. Hence, the answer cannot be option B.

The excerpt tells us that Brontë's brother Chaucer and his buddies are the ones who moved the car hence, they are the pranksters. This makes option C the wrong answer.

Because there is also no allusion, implicit or explicit indication that Braddon is a pessimist, hence, we are left with option A as D is also incorrect.

Note that according to the principles of leadership, being able to respond appropriately in cases of emergency is an important leadership trait. The emergency here was that Brontë's car went missing and Braddon stepped in to try to solve the problem.

Learn more about leadership:
https://brainly.com/question/1732683

#SPJ1

Full Question:

"Don't worry," Wilkie told his friends proudly. "My brother may be a suc .ker when it comes to bad movies, but he's great in an emergency." I hope the police can find my car quickly," worried Brontë. "I don't know what I'll do otherwise." She looked back across the parking lot to see Braddon running toward them."There's nothing to worry about," he told the group with a scowl. They stared at him in disbelief."The police found the car already?" asked Wilkie in amazement.

"No, I never called the police," Braddon replied. "I didn't have to. I saw Brontë's brother Chaucer and his buddies inside the movie theater. They were laughing about how they took her car and parked it behind the movie theater. They thought it was a hilarious prank."I have had just about enough of him!" exclaimed Brontë. "My brother needs to learn a lesson about these ridiculous pranks of his."We'll help you come up with a great way to get back at him," Wilkie offered. "Who knows? Maybe Braddon can film it and make a blockbuster movie called Revenge."

Based on the dialogue in this passage, Wilkie considers his brother Braddon to be a

OA. strong leader.

OB. discerning movie critic.

OC. cruel prankster.

OD. pessimistic person.

Explanation:

In my opinion, I think I am both. The reason is if I don't have a dream than nothing is possible to be done. If you don't have a dream you will have no goals and never succeed. If I want to be a doer, I have to write down my dreams and make it come true. The reason that I think that I am both is because I always persevere to make my dreams come true even though some of my dreams seems to be insane but I tried hard to make it succeed and I take action to try. Also, being a doer doesn't mean that you can't fail being a doer just means that you think and act at the same time whereas being a dreamer is just thinking but It doesn't means that you won't fail. There might be obstacles but if I never give up and I have a positive mind I think I can do it! So if I just keep up a little more maybe one day all my dreams will come true but obviously those superhero dreams won't because they're not realistic but if I think about something more realistic than there is a huge chance that they will come true!

Answer:

they are sponsering Aresnal

Explanation:

Answer:

What paragraph?

Explanation:

Answer: Select Option A. The right response would be to commend Mariana's parents' accomplishments. Epideictic speech, commonly referred to as ceremonial oratory.

It is a style of speaking intended to extol or denounce someone or something. It is generally employed at formal gatherings like weddings, funerals, graduations, and political events, and it frequently contains rhetorical flourishes and flowery language. An audience listens to a formal address or discourse known as a speech. It is possible to use speeches to convince, educate, or inspire a crowd. Speeches might be prepared in advance or spontaneously. An introduction, middle, and end are standard components of speeches.

The complete Question is :

mariana has to write an epideictic speech for her speech class. which specific purpose statement is appropriate for this speech?

A. To praise the achievements of Mariana's parents

B. To educate the audience about the importance of hard work

C. To motivate the audience to strive for success

D. To celebrate Mariana's family history

To know more about Epideictic speech refer to the link below :

brainly.com/question/1130600

#SPJ4

The given statement "Taking down notes will confuse you with ideas and will not let you keep track of the discussion" is False because taking notes during a discussion can actually be quite helpful in keeping track of ideas and maintaining focus.

Taking down notes is an essential part of effective communication, especially in situations where there is a lot of information to absorb and remember. Notes can help to keep track of the discussion, organize thoughts, and remember important details. Taking notes can also help to stay focused and engaged in the conversation, as it requires active listening and processing of the information being presented.

In academic settings, note-taking is often encouraged as a way to help students learn and retain information. Research has shown that taking notes can improve recall and comprehension, as well as increase engagement and participation in class. Similarly, in business settings, taking notes can help to ensure that important details are not overlooked and that everyone is on the same page.

Of course, it is possible to take too many notes or to become too focused on note-taking at the expense of actively participating in the discussion. However, when done properly, taking notes can be a valuable tool for effective communication and learning.

The question was Incomplete, Find the full content below :

Taking down notes will confuse you with ideas and will not let you keep track of the discussion - True/ False

Know more about the Discussion here :

https://brainly.com/question/31350736

#SPJ11

The main answer is:

1. The output of the given code segment will be:

  4

  3

  2

  1

2. When the main method is called, it invokes the factorial method with the argument 4. The factorial method is a recursive function that calculates the factorial of a number.

  In the first recursive call, the value of 'n' is 4. Since it is greater than 1, the else block is executed. It calculates the factorial by recursively calling the factorial function with 'n-1' as the argument.

  The recursion continues until 'n' becomes 1. At that point, the if condition is satisfied, and the method prints the value of 'n' (which is 1) and returns 1.

  As the recursion unwinds, the values of 'res' are printed in reverse order (4, 3, 2) since the multiplication operation is performed before printing the value.

3. This code segment demonstrates the concept of recursion and how a factorial function can be implemented using recursion. By breaking down the problem into smaller sub-problems, the factorial of a number can be calculated iteratively until reaching the base case.

Learn more about : demonstrates

what is demonstrate? and what is demonstrate meaning?

#SPJ11

Answer:

The problem of evil is a philosophical and theological challenge that seeks to reconcile the existence of evil and suffering in the world with the existence of a loving and all-powerful God. While some argue that the existence of evil is evidence against the existence of God, others maintain that it is possible to reconcile the two through various philosophical and theological arguments. For example, the story of Job in the Bible suggests that God allows suffering to test and strengthen our faith. The fall of humanity in the Garden of Eden is seen as evidence of the consequences of human free will and disobedience. Philosophers have also proposed the inconsistent triad, which suggests that it is impossible to have a God who is all-loving, all-powerful, and allows evil to exist simultaneously. However, defenders of theism have argued that God may have reasons for allowing evil that we cannot comprehend or that the existence of free will necessitates the possibility of evil. Overall, the problem of evil is a complex and ongoing debate that requires careful consideration of both philosophical and theological arguments.