applying the relevant rule of law to the facts of a case requires a judge to find previously decided cases that, in relation to the case under consideration, are:

Answer:

are various definitions of the term “legal system”. A Legal System is the framework of rules and institutions within a nation regulating individual’s relations with one another and between them and the government.(Book) In this world, there are many types of legal systems, but the few major legal sytems of the world today are civil law, common law, customary law, religious law, socialist and mixed law systems.

Civil law is the dominant legal tradition today in most of Europe, all of Central and South America, parts of Asia and Africa, and even some discrete areas of the common-law world, like Louisiana and Quebec. The origin of civil law is from the Roman law. The civil law is a set out of comprehensive system of rules which are applied and interpreted by judges. Besides that, civil law is older, more widely distributed and in many ways more influential than the common law.

Common law is a system of law that is derived from judges’ decisions, rather than statutes or constitutions. It is based on tradition, past practices and legal precedents set by courts through interpretation of statues, legal legislation, and past rulings.It is english origin and is found in United States and other countries with strong english influences

Customary law is a traditional common rule or practice that has become an intrinsic part of the accepted and expected conduct in a community, profession, or trade and is treated as a legal requirement. Not many countries in the world today will operate under a legal system which could be wholly customary. However, customary law still plays a sometimes significant role, like in the matters of personal conduct, in many countries or political entities with mixed legal systems.

Islamic law is derived from the interpretation of the Koran. Its primary objective is social justice, but also includes property rights, economic decision making, and types of economic freedom. Islamic law is mostly found in Pakistan, Iran, and other Islamic states.

Socialist law is based on fundamental tenets of Marxist-socialist state and center on concept of economic, political, and social policies of the state. It can be found in some independent states of the former Soviet Union, China and other Marxist-socialist states.

A mixed legal system is a mixture of two or more legal system practised by some countries.

2.0 Malaysia’s Legal System

Different country practices different types of legal system. Some country practices one type of legal system while others practices the mixed legal system which means a combination of two or more legal systems. Malaysia for example, practices the mixed legal system which includes the Common Law, Islamic law and Customary Law. Malaysia’s legal system comprises laws which have arise from three significant periods in Malaysian history dating from the Malacca Sultanate, to the spread of Islam to Southeast Asia, and following the absorption into the indigenous culture of British colonial rule which introduced a constitutional government and the common law. Malaysia’s unique legal system is designed to balance the delicate racial and religious needs of its heterogeneous people. The Malaysian legal system law can be classified into two . However, according to the democratic ruling system, the Chief Executive is the Prime Minister. This does not mean that the Yang di-Pertuan Agong is unable to voice any opinion, but rather that he must act on government advice, whatever his personal view might be. The Yang di-Pertuan Agong appoints a Cabinet to advise him on country’s matter. The Cabinet consists of the Prime Minister and a number of Ministers who must all be members of Parliament. Besides that, the Government has set up various agencies to ensure the smooth enforcement of the law. It comprised of three main components, namely ministries, departments and statutory bodies.

laws pertaining to persons professing the religion of Islam.

Share this:

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

OSCOLA

APA

MLA

MLA-7

Harvard

Vancouver

Wikipedia

All ltd, 'L

Trustedsite Law

Answer:

Trying to say that all men and wemon have equal rights

Explanation:

Conduct v. lane, 589 N.W.2d 879 (Iowa 1999)) to support its decision in this case. Why do you think the court relied on this previous case?

a) Judges should care if attorneys submit plagiarized legal briefs or motions because it undermines the integrity of the legal profession and the judicial system. Legal briefs and motions are critical to the legal process, and they are expected to be original works that accurately represent the attorney's legal arguments. If an attorney submits a plagiarized brief or motion, they are not only misrepresenting their own work, but they are also misleading the court and potentially influencing the outcome of the case based on false information. Furthermore, plagiarism is a form of dishonesty, which is incompatible with the ethical standards of the legal profession. Judges have a responsibility to uphold the integrity of the legal system, and allowing attorneys to submit plagiarized work undermines this responsibility.

b) The Iowa Supreme Court referred to the previous case of Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Lane, 589 N.W.2d 879 (Iowa 1999) to support its decision in this case because it established precedent for how the court should handle cases of attorney plagiarism. In the Lane case, the court had disciplined an attorney for submitting a plagiarized brief, and the court had emphasized the importance of maintaining the integrity of the legal profession and the judicial system. By referring to the Lane case, the court in this case was able to build on that precedent and reinforce the importance of original legal work and ethical conduct by attorneys. Additionally, relying on previous cases helps to ensure consistency in the court's decisions and demonstrates a respect for legal precedent.

To learn more about   supreme court  here

https://brainly.com/question/18228641

#SPJ4

In the second case, Deason v. Ellis, the court will most likely apply stare decisis and divide the water rights because the facts of the two cases are similar.

It should be noted that facts simply means the evidence that are presented in a literary work or a research.

In this case, in the second case, Deason v. Ellis, the court will most likely apply stare decisis and divide the water rights because the facts of the two cases are similar.

Learn more about facts on:

brainly.com/question/25465770

#SPJ4

The laws governing financial regulations in Ghana aim to foster a stable, secure, and inclusive financial system that supports economic growth and protects the interests of consumers and investors.

In Ghana, the laws governing financial regulations aim to ensure stability, integrity, and transparency in the country's financial system. These laws establish the legal framework for financial regulation and oversight in Ghana with the following objectives:

1. Financial Stability: The laws aim to maintain the stability of the financial system by monitoring and managing risks, promoting sound practices, and preventing excessive risk-taking by financial institutions. The Bank of Ghana, as the central bank, plays a crucial role in ensuring financial stability.

2. Consumer Protection: Financial regulations in Ghana seek to protect the interests of consumers and investors. These laws require financial institutions to provide clear and accurate information to consumers, ensure fair and transparent practices, and establish mechanisms for handling customer complaints and disputes.

3. Market Integrity: The regulations aim to maintain the integrity of financial markets by preventing fraud, market manipulation, insider trading, and other illicit activities. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) oversees the securities market to ensure fair and orderly trading.

4. Prudential Regulation: Financial regulations impose prudential requirements on financial institutions to safeguard the stability and solvency of the banking, insurance, and other financial sectors. These requirements include capital adequacy ratios, liquidity standards, and risk management guidelines.

5. Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing: Financial regulations in Ghana include measures to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorist activities. Financial institutions are required to implement customer due diligence procedures, report suspicious transactions, and cooperate with relevant authorities in combating financial crimes.

6. Supervision and Enforcement: The regulatory bodies in Ghana, such as the Bank of Ghana, SEC, and National Insurance Commission, have the authority to supervise and enforce compliance with financial regulations. They conduct inspections, audits, and investigations to ensure that financial institutions adhere to the prescribed rules and regulations.

Overall, the laws governing financial regulations in Ghana aim to foster a stable, secure, and inclusive financial system that supports economic growth and protects the interests of consumers and investors.

learn more about financial regulations: https://brainly.com/question/25701422

#SPJ1

Convex

They take light from all points and converge them into one, defined point. This gives it the ability to enlarge an image.

I hope this helps! :)

The document is called Pleadings.

A lawsuit is an action brought by one or more parties in a civil court of law against another party. Only a limited number of laws from long ago that are still in force include the phrase "suit in law." The term "lawsuit" refers to a civil action in which the plaintiff asks the court for a legal or equitable remedy.

The plaintiff's complaint must get a response from the defendant. If the plaintiff wins, a judgment will be rendered in their favor, and the court may then make a number of orders, including those to uphold a right, grant damages, or impose a temporary or permanent injunction to stop or compel action. It is possible to issue a declaratory decision to end future legal problems.

To know more about Lawsuit, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/18273856

#SPJ4

Answer:

Auditor General.

Explanation:

Un auditor es una persona que realiza una auditoría y verifica, mediante cuestionamiento, observación y escucha, cómo se está desarrollando una persona u organización y si se están cumpliendo las especificaciones financieras y legales que le son exigibles.  Así, el Auditor General de Gobierno es el funcionario público que controla el estado financiero de las entidades de la administración pública, así como también lleva a cabo la fiscalización y control de cada acto particular que es realizado por el gobierno.

Answer:What are the ethical violations of a paralegal?

Here are five ethical dilemmas that paralegals encounter in their work:

Unauthorized Practice. ...

Maintaining Confidentiality. ...

Supervising Attorney Reviewing the Paralegal's Work. ...

Role of Technology. ...

Conflicts of Interest

Explanation:

Answer:

Joshua = 1

Joshua is a story of conquest and fulfillment for the people of God. After many years of slavery in Egypt and 40 years in the desert, the Israelites were finally allowed to enter the land promised to their fathers.

Judges = 2

The book of Judges depicts the life of Israel in the Promised Land—from the death of Joshua to the rise of the monarchy. It tells of urgent appeals to God in times of crisis and apostasy, moving the Lord to raise up leaders (judges) through whom He throws off foreign oppressors and restores the land to peace.

Ruth = 3

The book of Ruth has been called one of the best examples of short narrative ever written. It presents an account of the remnant of true faith and piety in the period of the judges through the fall and restoration of Naomi and her daughter-in-law Ruth (an ancestor of King David and Jesus).

1 Samuel = 4

Samuel relates God's establishment of a political system in Israel headed by a human king. Through Samuel's life, we see the rise of the monarchy and the tragedy of its first king, Saul.

2 Samuel = 5

After the failure of King Saul, 2 Samuel depicts David as a true (though imperfect) representative of the ideal theocratic king. Under David's rule the Lord caused the nation to prosper, to defeat its enemies, and to realize the fulfillment of His promises.

1 Kings = 6

1 Kings continues the account of the monarchy in Israel and God's involvement through the prophets. After David, his son Solomon ascends the throne of a united kingdom, but this unity only lasts during his reign. The book explores how each subsequent king in Israel and Judah answers God's call—or, as often happens, fails to listen.

2 Kings = 7

2 Kings carries the historical account of Judah and Israel forward. The kings of each nation are judged in light of their obedience to the covenant with God. Ultimately, the people of both nations are exiled for disobedience.

1 Chronicles = 8

Just as the author of Kings had organized and interpreted Israel's history to address the needs of the exiled community, so the writer of 1 Chronicles wrote for the restored community another history.

2 Chronicles = 9

2 Chronicles continues the account of Israel's history with an eye for restoration of those who had returned from exile.

Ezra = 10

The book of Ezra relates how God's covenant people were restored from Babylonian exile to the covenant land as a theocratic (kingdom of God) community even while continuing under foreign rule.

Nehemiah = 11

Closely related to the book of Ezra, Nehemiah chronicles the return of this "cupbearer to the king" and the challenges he and the other Israelites face in their restored homeland.

Esther = 12

Esther records the institution of the annual festival of Purim through the historical account of Esther, a Jewish girl who becomes queen of Persia and saves her people from destruction.

Explanation:

Here you go! Hope this helps! Brainliest would be much appreciated! Have a great day! :)

Answer:

what/?

Explanation:

Answer:

itz a case...

Explanation:

Renowned forensic scientist Henry Lee said Thursday that the O.J. Simpson double-murder trial in 1995 not only revealed the racial chasm in America but the importance of strictly following established protocols in processing crime scenes.

“There were so many issues with the major crime scene in that case,” said Mr. Lee, who holds a doctorate and who testified for five days as a defense expert for Simpson. “This case set the landmarks for crime scene and laboratory handling of evidence.’

Mr. Lee’s comments came on the first day of the two-day inaugural conference “Pioneers of Forensic Science,” at which he is the first honoree. One of the world’s foremost criminalists, Mr. Lee has been involved in the Laci Peterson, JonBenet Ramsey, Caylee Anthony and Vince Foster cases, among many others.

Mr. Lee, Connecticut’s chief emeritus of scientific services, has served as that state’s commissioner of public safety, forensic science laboratory director and chief criminalist. He is the founder of the University of New Haven’s Henry C. Lee Institute of Forensic Science and is the namesake of its Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice and Forensic Sciences.

He spoke on a panel “People v. O.J. Simpson: An Interdisciplinary Retrospective on the Case that Brought Forensic Science to the World.”

Other panelists included F. Lee Bailey, a member of Simpson’s “Dream Team” of defense attorneys; Dr. Michael Baden, former chief medical examiner for New York City who also was a Simpson defense expert; and Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, Pittsburgh’s renowned forensic pathologist who was an expert commentator on the Simpson case on national television programs. He also is the namesake of Duquesne University’s Cyril H. Wecht Institute of Forensic Science and Law, the conference sponsor. University President Kenneth G. Gormley, who holds law degree, moderated the two-hour panel discussion.

A native of China, Mr. Lee said he had no idea who Mr. Simpson was when he was asked to be an expert for him at trial. He reconstructed the crime scene and examined every piece of evidence collected.

“I knew there was something wrong with the case by the physical evidence. There were lots of problems.”

He discovered that notes taken by Los Angeles Police Department criminalists at the scene were later substituted with other documents. “We found this out because the notes are stapled, but we found extra staple holes,” meaning they had been re-stapled.

Mr. Lee recounted his testimony about a crucial piece of the prosecution’s evidence—a bloodstain found on the walkway outside the Bundy Drive home where Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman were killed in June 1994.

DNA tests indicated O.J. Simpson was the likely source of the blood, but Mr. Lee testified he was suspicious because he discovered four small patches of blood on the paper packet wrapped around the Bundy evidence. That would indicate the blood swatches were wet and leaked onto the paper, yet LAPD technicians had testified that they left the swatches to dry overnight.

Asked by defense attorney Barry Scheck to account for the stains, Mr. Lee famously answered, “The only explanation I can give under these circumstances is, something’s wrong.”

As a scientist, Mr. Lee wouldn’t speculate either at the trial or at Thursday’s conference about how that could have occurred, but Mr. Bailey isn’t a scientist, so he wasn’t so circumspect. That evidence and the infamous glove and the bloody sock and anything else indicating Simpson’s guilt was planted, he said.

The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 1925 is a U.S. federal law governing arbitration agreements. The Supreme Court has significantly limited its applicability since its enactment in 1925.

The Supreme Court has greatly reduced the applicability of the FAA, 1925 since its passage in 1925. This statement is true.What is the FAA 1925?The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 1925 is a United States federal law that governs arbitration agreements. This Act has been in force since 1925 and governs contracts in which the parties have agreed to settle disputes using arbitration. The Supreme Court has greatly reduced the applicability of the FAA, 1925 since its passage in 1925.

learn more about Federal here;

https://brainly.com/question/30366903?

#SPJ11

Answer:

loss

Explanation:

The economic goals are the objectives of any nation which it desires to achieve. The economic goals of any nations includes full employment, efficiency, security, equity, stability, economic freedom and economic growth.

The economic goal are sometimes incompatible with each other. The cost of fulfilling the one set goals is having less resources to address the other sets of goals.

The economic goals conflict with one another. Every goal cannot be achieve at the same time. The choice of one goal comes with the loss of another goal.

Every person has two alleles, and only one of them gets passed down to the next generation, according to the law of segregation. A pair of genes can be inherited independently of another pair, according to the law of independent assortment.

To learn more about law of segregation, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/25710344

Entitlement programs are government programs that guarantee access to some benefit by members of a specific group and are based on established Rights or by legislation.

These programs provide assistance to individuals who meet certain eligibility requirements, such as low-income households, disabled individuals, and seniors. Examples of entitlement programs include Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

Entitlement programs differ from discretionary spending programs, which are subject to annual appropriations by Congress. While entitlement programs are often controversial due to their high costs and potential for abuse, they remain an important source of support for many vulnerable populations in the United States.

For more such questions on Rights, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/26490081

#SPJ11

Answer:

Parts of the Executive Branch

Explanation:

The President, Vice President, The Cabinet, Executive Departments, Independent Agencies, and other Boards, Commissions, and Committees.

Answer:

Hope this helps (O) _ (O)

Explanation:

Economics This lesson identifies the key princi- ples that guide economic analysis. It introduces students to the basic economic problems of scarce resources, unlimited wants, the need to choose among alternatives, the consequences of cost, and the importance of incen- tives. While noting that nothing of value is free, the les- son explains how voluntary trade helps to provide more goods and services. While today is important, people are forward-looking in the decisions they make.

Reasoning Economic reasoning proceeds from basic assumptions about human activity. This lesson introduces students to these basic assumptions and uses them to model economic reasoning about an issue. It shows students how to apply the assumptions in the case of what seems to be a mystery: Why would people who admire a trim, slender appearance in others choose to eat too much and be inactive?

False. The size of juries and voting requirements can vary depending on the state and the type of offense being tried. In most states, the minimum size for a criminal jury is 12, but some states allow for smaller juries in certain types of cases, such as misdemeanors.

Some states also allow for non-unanimous verdicts in certain cases, such as in Louisiana where 10 out of 12 jurors must agree on a verdict for serious felony cases. However, in federal courts, the size of the jury is typically 12 and a unanimous decision is required for conviction in criminal cases.

Learn more about voting requirements

https://brainly.com/question/29783503

#SPJ4

Answer:

Because I feel we should be able to know what's going on but my opinion doesn't matter i learned that in college debate

Explanation:

Answer:

B. trade deficit

Explanation:

just did it on a-p-e-x

A trade deficit occurs when a country imports more goods and services than it exports. In this case, the country is importing goods and services worth $700 million and exporting goods and services worth about $500 million, indicating a trade deficit of $200 million. The correct option is b.

The salaries of domestic workers are lowered when there is a trade deficit, placing many of them in lower-income tiers. Saving money is typically far more difficult for low-income families. Decreases in national savings can and do result from growing trade imbalances.

A trade surplus, on the other hand, occurs when a country exports more goods and services than it imports.

Comparative advantage and absolute advantage refer to a country's ability to produce a particular good or service more efficiently than other countries. They are not directly related to trading deficits or surpluses.

Thus, the ideal selection is option b.

Learn more about trade deficit here:

https://brainly.com/question/25313034

#SPJ7

Within the law, you are permitted to release the record to the husband, hence you should go ahead a give this information to the husband.

See the explanation below

According to the HIPAA Privacy Rule at 45 CFR 164.510(b)

"specifically permits covered entities to share information that is directly relevant to the involvement of a spouse".

However, as a professional, you are not supposed to release information of a patient to an unknown person, in such a case the patient must approve of this first before you go ahead to give it out.

Learn more about the  HIPAA Privacy Rule  here:

https://brainly.com/question/11069745

#SPJ1

Answer: nothing; because Sam is an independent contractor.

Explanation:

Under the law of agency, an agency is created when an authority is delegated from one individual to another individual whereby such person is appointed to do a particular job.

Based on the information given, Joe is not liable liable to the passer-by because Sam is an independent contractor as he was contracted to Casey out a task. If he was an employee of Joe, then he will be liable.

Firearms and their projectiles can provide valuable information to law enforcement officials, forensic scientists, and criminal investigators.

A firearm is a type of weapon that uses gunpowder or other explosive materials to launch a projectile through a barrel. The projectile is the actual bullet that is propelled out of the gun when it is fired. There are several things that can be derived from both the firearm and its projectiles:

Forensic evidence: Firearms and their projectiles can leave behind valuable forensic evidence at a crime scene. This evidence can be used to identify the type of gun used, the direction from which the shot was fired, and the trajectory of the bullet.

Ballistics: The study of the behavior of bullets and projectiles is known as ballistics. Ballistics can be used to determine the velocity, trajectory, and impact of a bullet, as well as the damage it can cause.

Weapon identification: Firearms and their projectiles can be used to identify the type of weapon used in a crime. This can help law enforcement officials to track down the perpetrator.

Ammunition analysis: Analysis of the ammunition used in a firearm can provide clues about the person who fired the gun. For example, the type of ammunition used can indicate the level of skill or training of the shooter.

Criminal investigations: Firearms and their projectiles can be an important piece of evidence in criminal investigations. They can be used to link suspects to crimes, provide evidence of motive, and help to build a case against a defendant in court.

Overall, firearms and their projectiles can provide valuable information to law enforcement officials, forensic scientists, and criminal investigators.

learn more about firearms and their projectiles: https://brainly.com/question/31180996

#SPJ1

Dollar diplomacy, the approach taken by Taft and Roosevelt, focused on utilising American mansions to exert influence in Latin America, and the rooselvelt Corollary employed political and military measures.

What were Taft and Roosevelt's policies?

The Dollar Diplomacy, which President Taft adopted, increased American corporate involvement abroad by reaffirming military allies with economic ties, building up American forces, and achieving long-term peace. Roosevelt used "The Big Stick Diplomacy" in his diplomatic efforts. It was an interventionist approach in Latin American affairs because, in the eyes of the United States, those nations couldn't keep their affairs under control. Both diplomatic methods have their drawbacks, but historians think that Roosevelt's Big Stick was more significant overall since it produced more successes than setbacks. The other two diplomatic enmities grew in Latin America and Asia, which eventually affected the collective action in World War I. Consequently, both policies are unique.

learn more about roosevelt's policy hear:

brainly.com/question/8140223

#SPJ4

Answer:

It would be a violation of the person's sixth amendment and fifth amendment rights!

Explanation:

It would not be a violation of their first amendment or their second amendment. Sixth amendment violation because the cop did not inform the person of the accused crimes. Fifth amendment violation because the cop did not provide information to the accused of their constitutional rights.

A medium of exchange is an object that sellers will accept as payment. The correct option is A.

A widely used method of payment for goods and services is known as a medium of exchange. It is a widely accepted and acknowledged medium that makes transactions between buyers and sellers easier. Currency such as coins and banknotes, electronic payment methods such as credit cards and digital wallets and other forms of money that can be used to make purchases are examples of mediums of exchange.

Direct bartering is no longer necessary because a medium of exchange makes economic transactions simple and effective. The correct option is A.

Learn more about payment at:

brainly.com/question/8401780

#SPJ4

Your boss handles some of the tension on your team during a team meeting and proposes that your team work individually rather than collectively.

A meeting enables each person to comprehend the group's overall goal as well as how his or her own effort and that of others might advance the group's objectives. 4. A meeting instills in everyone in attendance a sense of dedication to the choices it takes and the goals it pursues.

Because not meeting our wants causes us emotional suffering, it is crucial to do so. It's possible that you're in pain without understanding why or what needs aren't being met. when our requirements.

To know more about meeting visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15831587

#SPJ4