Anyone got the answer? Would be nice pls

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

The independent variable is t (time) because no matter what happens the weeks will still pass. The dependent variable is b (balance) because it depends on the amount of time passed. You can see that after every week the balance decreases by 50. So when the independent variable increases by 1, the dependent variable decreases by 50.

Answer:

10 cups of sugar

Step-by-step explanation:

Multiply by 5

Answer:

Below.

Step-by-step explanation:

Reading off the graph:

y-intercept  = (0, 2.5)

x-intercept = (3.5, 0)

Answer:

-5.5

Step-by-step explanation:

-10, -9, -8, -8, -6, -5, -1, 1, 7, 6

This condition alone does not guarantee that n is an absolute pseudoprime; it still needs to pass a prime number test while being composite.

An integer n of the form (6k+1)(12k+1)(18k+1) is said to be an absolute pseudoprime if all three factors are prime. This type of integer is interesting because it behaves like a prime number in some ways, even though it may not be prime.

To understand why this is the case, we need to look at the properties of absolute pseudoprimes. One important property is that if n is an absolute pseudoprime, then it passes the Miller-Rabin test for all bases up to log2(n). This means that it is very difficult to tell whether or not n is actually prime, since it behaves like a prime in terms of the Miller-Rabin test.

Another interesting property of absolute pseudoprimes is that they are related to the Fermat pseudoprimes. In particular, if n is an absolute pseudoprime, then it is also a Fermat pseudoprime to base 2.

Overall, absolute pseudoprimes are an intriguing mathematical concept that have many interesting properties. While they may not be prime, they behave like prime numbers in some important ways, making them a valuable tool for number theorists and mathematicians.
An integer n is an absolute pseudoprime if it is a composite number (non-prime) that passes the prime number test, such as the Fermat primality test. In the given expression, n = (6k + 1)(12k + 1)(18k + 1), n would be considered an absolute pseudoprime if all three factors (6k + 1, 12k + 1, and 18k + 1) are prime numbers.

To learn more about integer visit;

brainly.com/question/15276410

#SPJ11

Answer:

2m+3mn-5

Step-by-step explanation:

2m+n x 3m + (-5)

2m +3mn + (-5)

2m +3mn -5

Answer:

2,

Step-by-step explanation:

It will be a low value < 7.

It.s in the acid range.t

Answer:

It would be 2!

I took the K-12 Quiz

The closest solution to this total among the available possibilities is 0.68, indicating that the portfolio is likely to surpass its benchmark in three or fewer quarters over the course of a year.

The field of mathematics concerned with probability is known as probability theory. Although there are various distinct interpretations of probability, probability theory approaches the idea rigorously mathematically by articulating it through a set of axioms.

Here,

The probability that the portfolio outperforms its benchmark in three or fewer quarters over the course of a year is the sum of the probabilities of outperforming the benchmark in exactly 0 quarters, 1 quarter, 2 quarters, and 3 quarters.

Since the probability of outperforming the benchmark in any quarter is 0.75, the probability of not outperforming the benchmark in a quarter is 1 - 0.75 = 0.25.

The probability of not outperforming the benchmark in exactly 0 quarters is 0.25⁰ = 1

The probability of not outperforming the benchmark in exactly 1 quarter is 0.25¹= 0.25

The probability of not outperforming the benchmark in exactly 2 quarters is 0.25² = 0.0625

The probability of not outperforming the benchmark in exactly 3 quarters is 0.25³ = 0.015625

So, the probability of outperforming the benchmark in exactly 0 quarters, 1 quarter, 2 quarters, and 3 quarters is 1 - 0.25⁰, 1 - 0.25¹, 1 - 0.25², and 1 - 0.25³, respectively.

The sum of these probabilities is the probability of outperforming the benchmark in three or fewer quarters over the course of a year:

P(outperform in three or fewer quarters) = 1 - 0.25⁰ + 1 - 0.25¹ + 1 - 0.25² + 1 - 0.25³

This expression can be calculated to get an exact answer, but to get the closest answer to the options given, we can round off the intermediate results to 2 decimal places:

P(outperform in three or fewer quarters) = 1 + 0.75 + 0.94 + 0.98

The closest answer to this sum among the options given is 0.68, so the probability that the portfolio outperforms its benchmark in three or fewer quarters over the course of a year is closest to 0.68.

To know more about probability,

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ4

Answer:

G is the answer  

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

8x + 5

Step-by-step explanation:

\(3(x^{2} +2x+3) - 2(x^{2} +2)=\)

\(3x^{2} + 6x + 9 -2x^{2} -4=\)

\(5x^{2} +6x+5\)

I would advise Rolf to take advantage of the Section 179 deduction for the current year to maximize his tax savings. By doing so, he can deduct the full cost of the equipment purchased and placed into service, up to the Section 179 limit.

Rolf should consider utilizing the Section 179 deduction, which allows business owners to deduct the full cost of qualifying equipment purchased and placed into service during the year, instead of depreciating it over several years. The current Section 179 limit is $1,050,000. Since Rolf purchased equipment worth $1,080,000, he can fully deduct this amount, subject to the limit. By taking advantage of this deduction, Rolf can significantly reduce his taxable income for the current year, thereby lowering his tax liability in the highest marginal tax bracket.

Furthermore, Rolf's plan to semi-retire in the future and potentially drop into lower marginal tax brackets should be considered when deciding whether to utilize cost recovery deductions such as depreciation. If Rolf expects to be in a lower tax bracket in the coming years, it may be more advantageous to spread the deductions over the useful life of the equipment through depreciation. This would allow him to offset income in future years when his tax rate is lower. However, since Rolf plans to keep the business open for another three to five years before fully retiring, it is important to assess the potential tax implications during this period. Consulting with a tax professional would be beneficial in determining the most suitable strategy for Rolf's specific circumstances.

Learn more about tax liability here:

https://brainly.com/question/31965060

#SPJ11

The Cpk (Process Capability Index) for this machine is 0.5 (rounded to 3 decimal places).

To calculate the Cpk (Process Capability Index), we need to consider the specification limits and the process variation.

The Cpk is given by the formula:

Cpk = min[(USL - μ) / (3σ), (μ - LSL) / (3σ)], Where:

USL = Upper Specification Limit

LSL = Lower Specification Limit

μ = Process mean

σ = Process standard deviation

In this case, the Upper Specification Limit (USL) is 2 + 0.004 = 2.004 inches, and the Lower Specification Limit (LSL) is 2 - 0.004 = 1.996 inches.

Given that the process mean (μ) is 2.001 inches and the process standard deviation (σ) is 0.002 inch, we can substitute these values into the formula:

Cpk = min[(2.004 - 2.001) / (3 * 0.002), (2.001 - 1.996) / (3 * 0.002)]

Cpk = min[0.003 / 0.006, 0.005 / 0.006]

Cpk = min[0.5, 0.833]

Learn more about standard deviation (σ)  here:

brainly.com/question/31047803

#SPJ11

Answer:

y=-1/2x-2

Step-by-step explanation:

simplify the expression to get the equation in slope intercept form, and find the graph that fits it

Answer:

  700 mL

Step-by-step explanation:

You want to know the whole amount if 8% of it is 56 mL.

The problem statement tells you ...

  8% × whole = 56 mL

Divide by the coefficient ...

  whole = (56 mL)/(0.08) = 700 mL

The whole amount is 700 mL.

When one zero of 3x³ 4x² - 28x - 16 is 4, another zero will be C. -2.

It should be noted that to find the other zeros of the polynomial, we can use polynomial long division or synthetic division to factorize it.

Therefore, we have factored the polynomial as:

3x³ + 4x² - 28x - 16 = (x - 4)(3x² + 16x + 32)

The discriminant is negative, so the roots are complex conjugates:

x = (-16 ± 8i*✓(2)) / 6

x = (-8 ± 4i*✓(2)) / 3

Therefore, the other zeros of the polynomial are:

x = -2, (-8 + 4i*✓(2)) / 3, (-8 - 4i*✓(2)) / 3.

So the answer is option C: -2.

Learn more about polynomial on

https://brainly.com/question/1496352

#SPJ1

The correct statements are:

b. The population variances for each of the cells should be equal (i.e., there is homogeneity of variance).

c. The populations from which the samples are taken for a two-way ANOVA must be distributed normally.

In a two-way ANOVA, there are several assumptions that need to be met for valid statistical inference. Two of these assumptions are the equality of population variances and the normal distribution of populations.

b. The assumption of homogeneity of variance states that the population variances for each combination of levels of the two factors in a two-way ANOVA should be equal. Violation of this assumption can lead to biased results and affect the validity of the statistical test.

c. The assumption of normality states that the populations from which the samples are taken should follow a normal distribution. This assumption is important because the validity of the F-test used in ANOVA is based on the assumption of normality. Departures from normality can impact the accuracy and reliability of the results.

a. The statement in option (a) is not true. The two-way ANOVA is not robust to violations of the assumptions of sampling from normal distributions and homogeneity of variance, even if the samples are of equal size. Violations of these assumptions can lead to inaccurate and unreliable results.

d. The statement in option (d) is also not true. If the assumptions of a two-way ANOVA are violated, it does not necessarily mean that the researcher should conduct two separate one-way ANOVAs. There are alternative non-parametric tests or robust ANOVA methods that can be used in such cases. The choice of appropriate statistical analysis depends on the nature of the data and the specific research question.

Learn more about ANOVA here:

https://brainly.com/question/30763604

#SPJ11

Answer:

\(3n = 57\)

\(n = 19\)

D is the correct answer.

Answer:

sides

14 X 22 = 308 square foot there are four of these

308 X 4 = 1232 square foot.

triangles

A= 0.5 X b X h

0.5 X 14 X 10 = 70 square foot again there are four of these 70 X 4 = 280 square foot

1232 + 280 = 1512 square foot

1512/213 = 7.09859154

8 gallons of paint will need to be purchased.

Answer:

72

so the second one

Step-by-step explanation:

Triangles area= Base x Height ÷ 2

12x12= 144

144÷ 2 = 72

Answer:

41

Step-by-step explanation:

You have to use Pitagoras.

a^2 + b^2 = c^2

12^2 + 12^2 = c^2

144 + 144 = c^2

288 = c^2

c = √288 = 16.9

P triangle = 16.9 + 12 + 12 = 40.9

Rounded is 41

Answer:

Part A is -5

Part B is 10

Step-by-step explanation:

0=-5(2)+b

The graph of the function showing the asypmtote is attached

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

f(x) = (1/4)^x - 5

Set the radical to 0

So, we have

f(x) = 0

This represents the asypmtote

The graph has no integer solution because the base is a fraction

See attachment for the graph

Read mroe about asypmtote at

https://brainly.com/question/4138300

#SPJ1

The mean equal to the population proportion and a standard deviation calculated using the formula \(\sqrt{(p(1-p)/n)}\) For sample size 16, the sampling distribution of the sample mean will be normally distributed.

a) The sampling distribution of the sample proportion follows a binomial distribution due to the nature of the sampling process. The mean of the sampling distribution is equal to the population proportion, which is 0.18 in this case. The standard deviation of the sampling distribution can be calculated using the formula sqrt(p(1-p)/n), where p is the population proportion (0.18) and n is the sample size (100). The shape of the sampling distribution is approximately normal due to the Central Limit Theorem, which states that as the sample size increases, the sampling distribution approaches a normal distribution.

b) To find the probability that the sample proportion falls between 0.17 and 0.20, we need to calculate the area under the normal curve within that range. We can standardize the values by subtracting the mean (0.18) from each value and dividing by the standard deviation. Then, we can use the standard normal distribution table or a statistical software to find the corresponding probabilities for the standardized values and subtract them to get the desired probability.

c) For a sample size of 16, the sampling distribution of the sample mean will be approximately normally distributed if the sample itself is normally distributed, regardless of the shape of the population. This is due to the Central Limit Theorem, which states that as the sample size increases, the sampling distribution of the sample mean approaches a normal distribution. This property holds as long as the individual observations in the sample are independent. Therefore, the normality of the sampling distribution depends on the normality of the sample itself, not the shape of the population distribution.

Learn more about sampling here:

https://brainly.com/question/12823688

#SPJ11

Answer:

c = -22, 22

Step-by-step explanation:

\( {(x - 11)}^{2} = {x}^{2} - 22x + 121\)

\( {(x + 11)}^{2} = {x}^{2} + 22x + 121\)

At the end of the first 3 seconds, there would be 6 customers in line at the book store.

Little's Law can be used to calculate the number of customers in line at the end of the first 3 seconds. According to Little's Law: the average number of customers in the system is equal to the arrival rate multiplied by the time spent in the system.

In this case, the arrival rate during the first 3 seconds is 29 customers per second, and the time spent in the system is 3 seconds. Therefore the average number of customers in the system is 87 (29 customers per second x 3 seconds).

However since the bookstore can only serve 27 customers per second, the maximum number of customers that can be served during the first three seconds is 81 (27 customers per second x 3 seconds). This means that there are 6 customers who remain in line at the end of the first 3 seconds.

Learn more about customers be in the book store at brainly.com/question/30271425

#SPJ4

The scatter plot in the instance demonstrates a negative association.

The values for two different numerical variables are represented by dots in a scatter plot (also known as a scatter chart or scatter graph).

Each dot's location on the horizontal and vertical axes represents a data point's values.

To view relationships between variables, utilize scatter plots.

So, we say there is a positive correlation between the variables when the y variable tends to rise when the x variable rises.

We say there is a negative correlation between the variables when the y variable tends to decline as the x variable rises.

The scatter plot's points appear to form a line that runs downward from left to right.

It follows that the relationship between the x- and y-coordinates is inverse.

Therefore, the scatter plot in the instance demonstrates a negative association.

Know more about scatter plots here:

https://brainly.com/question/6592115

#SPJ4

The matrix is not invertible.

The given matrix is:

| 7 4 |

| 9 2 |

To find the inverse of the matrix, we can use the formula for a 2x2 matrix:

Let A = | a b |

       | c d |

The inverse of A, denoted as A^(-1), is given by:

A^(-1) = (1 / det(A))ˣ adj(A)

where det(A) is the determinant of A and adj(A) is the adjugate of A.

In this case, we have:

a = 7, b = 4, c = 9, d = 2

The determinant of A, det(A), is calculated as:

det(A) = ad - bc

= (7 ˣ  2) - (4 ˣ  9)

= 14 - 36

= -22

The adjugate of A, adj(A), is obtained by swapping the diagonal elements and changing the sign of the off-diagonal elements:

adj(A) = | d -b |

             | -c a |

= | 2 -4 |

   | -9 7 |

Finally, we can calculate the inverse of A as:

A^(-1) = (1 / det(A)) ˣ adj(A)

= (1 / -22) ˣ  | 2 -4 |

                         | -9 7 |

Simplifying the inverse matrix:

A^(-1) = | -2/11 2/11 |

           | 9/11 -7/11 |

Therefore, the correct choice is B: The matrix is not invertible.

Learn more about matrix

brainly.com/question/29132693

#SPJ11

Answer:

R1. Given

R2. Subtraction Property of Equality

R3. Distributive Property

S4. 9x = 61

R5. Division Property of Equality

Answer:

5(2x-3-x+8)=13

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope that this is helpful .

Have a great day.