Any court can impose its authority over an individual or organization if it can establish jurisdiction.
Hence, the correct option is a.
Jurisdiction refers to the power or authority of a court to hear and make decisions in a legal case.
If a court has jurisdiction over a person or organization, it has the authority to impose its decisions and rulings over them. Without jurisdiction, a court does not have the power to make decisions that are binding on the parties involved in a case.
Sovereignty refers to the supreme authority of a state over its territory and people and is not directly related to the power of a court.
Liability refers to legal responsibility for one's actions or conduct.
Jurisprudence refers to the theory and philosophy of law, which is not directly related to the court's authority to impose its decisions.
To know more about jurisdiction here:
https://brainly.com/question/12448353
#SPJ4
Benny was arrested by New York Police and charged with the armed robbery of a taxicab driver. While Benny was in jail waiting for his trial, a New York undercover officer was placed in Benny’s cell. Before the officer asked any questions, Benny said that he had robbed the cab driver. Benny’s statement was used against him at trial, despite his objection that he was not read his Miranda Rights, in violation of the Fifth Amendment.
Question: Should the court allow Benny’s statement to be used in court?
if u have 10 cookies then your friend takes 2 what do you have.
Answer:
Hello There!!
Explanation:
The answer is 8 because you had 10 and your friend takes 2 off from the 10.(10-2=8)
hope this helps, have a great day!!
~Pinky~
Explain the social forces vs personal agency debate and apply that lens to the documentary Made In America. Please cite specifics from the film to support your response.
Answer:
Hey there! I’m Billy, the guy behind BRB | Gone Somewhere Epic. I’ve been travelling around the world for six years, having an absolute blast going on epic adventures, without breaking the bank
Explanation:
Known as the world’s largest democracy, India is a truly fascinating country with a very proud people. It’s so awesome that I’ve been fortunate to visit India four times, and yearn to go back again.
Did you know: India was once an island, and even a part of Antarctica! About 50 million years ago, it connected with the Asian continental plate, and the Himalayas was born.
So I put together a compilation of the most incredible facts about this amazing country, including unusual, shocking, and lesser-known facts that will leave you in awe.
Did you also know: 47 is not only the number of awesome facts in this post, but is also the year (1947) that India became an independent nation!
Scroll on to read more amazing, fun, random, and interesting facts about India with pictures.
A person whom a member of Congress has been elected to represent.
A Member of Congress is elected to represent their constituents. The congress main work is to promote their interests, expressing their viewpoints etc.
An individual who a member of Congress has been chosen to represent is known as a constituent. To put it another way, a constituent is a person who lives in a certain congressional district and has the right to cast a ballot for the lawmaker who will represent that district in the House of Representatives or the Senate.
Addressing the wants and needs of their constituents, promoting their interests, and expressing their viewpoints in Congress are the responsibilities of the representative or senator.
For such more question on Congress:
https://brainly.com/question/16880802
#SPJ11
What is precedent according to the legal system?
Answer:
Precedent, in law, a judgment or decision of a court that is cited in a subsequent dispute as an example or analogy to justify deciding a similar case or point of law in the same manner.
Explanation:
Paying taxes, voting, jury duty and obeying the laws are all examples of-
Personal Responsibilities
O Government Responsibilities
O Civic Responsibilities
O Mandatory Responsibilities
Answer:
Civic Responsibilities
Explanation:
A duty (also called an obligation) is something that a citizen is required to do, by law. Examples of duties/obligations are: obeying laws, paying taxes, defending the nation and serving on juries. Rule of Law: Everyone is under the law. To obey the law, you must know the law.
Answer:
Civic Responsibility
Explanation:
Do you think Legalism and Confucianism helped ancient China
collectively to move out of the Warring State Period and establish
imperial order? Evaluate
Legalism and Confucianism played a vital role in ancient China's political, economic, and social development. The two schools of thought had different philosophies, which contributed to the country's rise to power after the Warring States Period. They are essential in understanding China's imperial order and its social and political systems during the time.
Both Legalism and Confucianism played a part in the unification of China by providing a unique set of rules for rulers to follow. Legalism offered an authoritarian approach to government, which relied on harsh punishment and strict laws to enforce order. Meanwhile, Confucianism focused on the moral cultivation of individuals and officials to ensure a just society. Hence, the two schools of thought played a critical role in laying the foundation for China's imperial order. However, Confucianism was the primary force in shaping China's imperial order because it became the mainstream philosophy of the Han Dynasty. It emphasized moral cultivation, humaneness, and social relationships, which encouraged people to follow a code of ethics based on mutual respect, responsibility, and trust. These principles provided a framework for social, economic, and political interactions between different classes and groups within society.
In conclusion, both Legalism and Confucianism helped ancient China collectively move out of the Warring State Period and establish imperial order. Although Legalism provided an authoritarian approach to government, Confucianism became the mainstream philosophy of the Han Dynasty and emphasized moral cultivation, humaneness, and social relationships. Confucianism was the main answer to China's imperial order, while Legalism was an essential contributor.
Learn more about the Han Dynasty: https://brainly.com/question/1149953
#SPJ11
Read Indiana Rules of Court- Rules of Trial Procedure and Indiana Rules of Court- Rules of Appellate Procedure.
List three things that both sets of rules have in common. Explain the commonality. (3 points)
List three things that differ between the two sets of rules. (3 points)
Explain how both sets of rules are organized and give your opinion as to whether you believe it was intentional. (4 points)
The Indiana Rules of Court consist of two main sets of rules: the Rules of Trial Procedure and the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
1. In general, trial procedure rules and appellate procedure rules may share some commonalities, such as:
Filing requirements: Both sets of rules typically specify the procedures for filing documents, including deadlines, formatting, and service requirements.Briefs or memoranda: Both trial and appellate procedures often involve the submission of written briefs or memoranda presenting legal arguments and relevant facts.Oral arguments: Both sets of rules may outline provisions for oral arguments, allowing parties to present their case before the court.2. Regarding the differences between trial procedure rules and appellate procedure rules, here are three potential distinctions:
Scope of review: Appellate rules usually focus on reviewing decisions made in lower courts, while trial rules govern the conduct of proceedings in the trial court.Timeframes: Trial procedure rules may outline specific timeframes for various stages of the trial, such as discovery or pre-trial conferences, while appellate rules might have different timeframes for filing appeals and responding to them.Standard of review: Trial procedure rules often center around the examination of evidence and the determination of facts, while appellate procedure rules may involve assessing legal errors made by the lower court.Regarding the organization of both sets of rules, they are typically structured in a logical manner to provide clarity and ease of reference for legal practitioners. The rules are usually organized into various sections, with each section addressing a particular aspect of the court proceedings.
The organization may follow a hierarchical structure, starting with general provisions and then delving into more specific rules for different stages of the process.
Whether the organization of the rules was intentional or not can be subjective. However, it is generally expected that court rules are organized in a systematic manner to facilitate ease of use and interpretation.
By arranging the rules in a logical order, it helps legal professionals navigate the complex procedural requirements and find the relevant provisions more efficiently. The intentional organization of rules also promotes consistency and uniformity in the application of the law, reducing confusion and promoting fairness within the legal system.
Know more about Appellate Procedure here:
https://brainly.com/question/22598788
#SPJ8
this is a test i need this NOW
In your opinion, what is the most important personality trait of a diplomat? (Read above to learn the traits) *
The successful FSO candidate demonstrates the skills, abilities, and personal qualities needed to be a diplomat. Diplomats have distinct personalities...They tend to be enterprising individuals, which means they’re adventurous, ambitious, assertive, extroverted, energetic, enthusiastic, confident, and optimistic. They are dominant, persuasive, and motivational. Some of them are also artistic, meaning they’re creative, intuitive, sensitive, articulate, and expressive.
They must stay calm in stressful or difficult situations and be able to think on their feet, adjusting quickly to changing situations. They must be able to work with people from other cultures with different values, political beliefs, and religions. Diplomats need strong analytical, organizational, and leadership skills. They must have good judgment and high integrity. In addition, they must be able to communicate effectively, both in writing and orally. They must be able to learn at least one foreign language, often several, during their careers. Finally, they must be resourceful and creative problem solvers
In your opinion, what is the most important personality trait of a diplomat? (Read above to learn the traits) *
Answer:
NOT YOU CHEATING ON A TEST CHILEE SHWEA
Explanation:
What is the path to becoming an attorney in the United states?
The path to becoming an attorney in the United States takes 7 years of full-time study which is after the high school, that is 4 years of undergraduate study, followed by 3 years of law school
Attorneys typically do need about seven years of college. After high school, there are interested students who need to complete a bachelor's degree, which then usually requires four years of study. Then, they also must complete their law school and earn a Juris Doctor (J.D.) degree.
However, you then become an attorney once you pass the bar exam and when you tend to enter the State Bar Association for the state in which you decide to practice law. You also need the 4 years of undergraduate study.
To learn more about the attorney here:
https://brainly.com/question/15362752
#SPJ4
Read the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed . . . and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have [the opportunity] for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
What part of the Sixth Amendment suggests that accused persons will be able to hear the charges against them?
Answer:
to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation
C. “informed of the nature and cause of the accusation”
If you steal your entire speech from another source and present it as if it was your own, you are committing what kind of plagiarism?.
The skills and knowledge gained by a worker through education and experience
are
*
human capital.
entrepreneurial.
production possibilities.
O physical capital.
Answer:
Human Capital
Explanation:
Human Capital means
the skills and knowledge gained by a worker through education and experience.
You did not obtain a license for your bicycle. The city ordinance requiring bike licenses carries a $50 fine for the failure to obtain a license. Which of the following is true? A. This is an example of a criminal law. B. This is an example of a private law. C. This is an example of a state regulation. D. This is an example of tort law.
The city ordinance requiring bike licenses carries a $50 fine for the failure to obtain a license. Option C. This is an example of a state regulation.
The situation described, where failing to obtain a license for a bicycle results in a $50 fine under a city ordinance, falls under the category of a state regulation. State regulations refer to laws or rules enacted by a government entity, in this case, the city, to govern certain activities or behaviors within its jurisdiction.
These regulations aim to maintain order, safety, or other desired objectives in the community. In this scenario, the city has implemented a regulation requiring bicycle licenses, and the failure to comply with this requirement incurs a specified penalty.
Bike licenses are legal permits required by some jurisdictions for bicycles. They serve as a form of identification and can be subject to regulations, fees, and penalties for non-compliance.
To learn more about bike licenses refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/121230#
#SPJ11
PLEASE HELP:
What percentage of law enforcement agencies use community policing?
A. 87 percent
B. 56 percent
C. 94 percent
D. 62 percent
87 percent of law enforcement agencies use community policing. Thus, option A is the correct option.
Community policing is a widely embraced approach by law enforcement agencies, with a staggering 87 percent adoption rate. This approach focuses on building strong partnerships between law enforcement personnel and the communities they serve.
Through this collaborative effort, law enforcement agencies aim to address local issues and concerns, prevent crime, and improve public safety. Community policing strategies revolve around proactive engagement, problem-solving, and trust-building initiatives. By involving community members in decision-making processes, law enforcement agencies can tap into their invaluable knowledge and support to effectively identify and solve local problems.
This widespread utilization of community policing reflects its proven effectiveness and recognition among law enforcement agencies as a key tool for promoting safe and inclusive communities.
Thus, option A is the correct option.
Learn more about community policing here:
https://brainly.com/question/32898107
#SPJ6
Kumasi Brewery Company Limited agreed to supply 5,000 cartons of Dry Gin for the 2022 Easter Season to Miklin Hotel. It was agreed that delivery was to be made on or before 15th April 2022. As at 17th April 2022, Kumasi Brewery Company Limited had not delivered the Dry Gin. Miklin Hotels therefore repudiated the contract, arguing that the Easter mass season was almost over. On 18th April 2022, Kumasi Brewery Company Limited intended to deliver and Miklin Hotel repudiated. Advice Kumasi Brewery Limited and Miklin Hotel
The advice to Kumasi Brewery Company Limited and Miklin Hotel is that by the terms of the contract, the contract is repudiated.
What is contract repudiation?Contract repudiation occurs when a party to a contract cannot perform or deliver based on the terms of the contract.
A party to the contract can repudiate or cancel the contract as a remedy for non-performance, rendering the contract null and void if a party decides to go ahead with the contract performance.
Thus, the advice to Kumasi Brewery Company Limited and Miklin Hotel is that by the terms of the contract, the contract is repudiated.
Learn more about contract repudiation at https://brainly.com/question/7053473
Due to the rising cost of water, Congress enacted a statute that allocated $20 million to fund a consortium of independent non-profit water organizations. The purpose of the consortium was to address the various issues causing a rise in the cost of water and water shortages across the United States, and to fund research into solutions. The statute provided clear guidelines about what the consortium should research and what it could spend, and specified that the remaining funds would be allocated for infrastructure improvements. In addition, the statute delegated to the Department of the Interior the power to select the water organizations to participate in the consortium.
Is the statute constitutional?
No, because Congress is delegating its authority to the executive branch of the government.
No, because the statute exceeds the scope of Congress's investigative power.
Yes, because Congress has the power to enact this legislation under the Necessary and Proper Clause.
Yes, because Congress has the power to spend for the general welfare of the public.
Option 1 is Correct. Because Congress has given the executive arm of the government authority, the statute is not constitutional.
A law passed by Congress that included $20 million was intended to fund a coalition of independent, non-profit water organizations in response to the rising cost of water. The consortium's goal was to solve the myriad problems that were driving up water prices and creating shortages all throughout the country while also funding research into potential remedies.
The act indicated that the consortium's leftover assets would be used for infrastructure upgrades, and it provided specific criteria for the kind of research it should conduct and the amount of money it may spend. In addition, the act gave the Secretary of the Interior the authority to choose which water groups would be included in the consortium.
Learn more about constitutional Visit: brainly.com/question/470736
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
Due to the rising cost of water, Congress enacted a statute that allocated $20 million to fund a consortium of independent non-profit water organizations. The purpose of the consortium was to address the various issues causing a rise in the cost of water and water shortages across the United States, and to fund research into solutions. The statute provided clear guidelines about what the consortium should research and what it could spend, and specified that the remaining funds would be allocated for infrastructure improvements. In addition, the statute delegated to the Department of the Interior the power to select the water organizations to participate in the consortium.
Is the statute constitutional?
1. No, because Congress is delegating its authority to the executive branch of the government.
2. No, because the statute exceeds the scope of Congress's investigative power.
3. Yes, because Congress has the power to enact this legislation under the Necessary and Proper Clause.
4. Yes, because Congress has the power to spend for the general welfare of the public.
Which example represents a reserved power?
O A. to open new naval bases
O B. to close post office branches
O C. to declare war on foreign countries
O D. to establish licensing for school teachers
Answer:
Explanation:
B
who is victimized the most by healthcare fraud in the united states?
The elderly population is often victimized the most by healthcare fraud in the United States. Fraudsters specifically target older individuals who may have complex healthcare needs, rely heavily on healthcare services, and may be more vulnerable to manipulation or deceptive practices.
Scammers exploit various schemes, such as billing for unnecessary procedures or services, identity theft, or fraudulent billing for durable medical equipment. These fraudulent activities not only harm the financial well-being of the elderly but also jeopardize their access to quality healthcare. Protecting the elderly from healthcare fraud requires awareness, education, and robust efforts from law enforcement agencies, healthcare providers, and government entities to detect, prevent, and prosecute fraudulent activities.
To know more about healthcare fraud, click here: brainly.com/question/32141232
#SPJ11
managing security operations
Answer:
thats not a question
Explanation:
9. If the patient requested an accounting of disclosures, would the General Hospital be required to
include the disclosure to Green & Green Law Firm in the accounting? Why or why not?
Answer:
yes as long as patient signs a disclosure form
If the patient requested an accounting of disclosures, would the General Hospital be required to include the disclosure to Green & Green Law Firm in the accounting yes, provided that the patient signs a disclosure form.
What is Law Firm?A team of attorneys that operate as a business together. Lawyers are qualified to bring legal actions on their clients' behalf and to provide guidance regarding other people's legal rights and obligations.
In addition to defending civil rights and drafting business contracts, law firms also help with a variety of daily activities and decision-making, including facilitating real estate transactions, advocating for environmental protection, and pursuing compensation for accident victims and ensuring fair trials for defendants.
Law firm business owners include independent attorneys up to major, full-service law firms (PDF, 1.8 MB). A number of positions exist within those firms, with lawyer being one of the more prevalent ones. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, lawyers held around 804,200 jobs in 2020, with legal services accounting for close to half of those positions (BLS).
To know more about Law Firm follow the link.
https://brainly.com/question/9942655
#SPJ2
importance of ubuntu in our democratic society
Answer:
Ubuntu means love, truth, peace, happiness, eternal optimism, inner goodness, etc. Ubuntu is the essence of a human being, the divine spark of goodness inherent within each being. From the beginning of time the divine principles of Ubuntu have guided African societies.
Hope it helps
Please mark me as the brainliest
Thank you
congress may not suspend this court order that releases a person accused of a crime. true or false
True, This court order that releases a person suspected of a crime cannot be suspended by Congress.
The federal government's legislative branch, known as Congress, is responsible for enacting laws on behalf of the American people. It shares authority with the president-led executive branch and the Supreme Court of the United States, which is the highest court in the judicial branch. The House of Representatives and the Senate, which together make up the United States Congress, are the two branches of government established by Article I of the Constitution. A congress is a formal gathering of the representatives of various nations, component states, organizations, trade unions, political parties, or other entities. The word, which derives from the Latin word congressus, first appeared in late Middle English to refer to a battle-related rencontre (meeting of enemies).
Learn more about Congress here
https://brainly.com/question/779570
#SPJ4
Why is competition limited in an oligopoly?
In an oligopoly, the market is shared among a few firms. Competition is limited in an oligopoly for various reasons, which are explained below:
Interdependence: In an oligopoly, firms are interdependent on each other. Every firm's decision will affect the other firms' profits and market share. Therefore, firms have to consider their rival's responses before taking any action. Firms are not in a position to decide on the price of the product because the price is linked to the output of the industry.
Pricing strategies: Firms in an oligopoly focus on non-price competition, like product differentiation, branding, and advertising. Firms in an oligopoly tend to differentiate their products to create brand loyalty. This type of competition requires a significant amount of capital, which makes it hard for new entrants.
Barriers to entry: Firms in an oligopoly use several barriers to prevent new firms from entering the market. High capital costs, government regulations, and patents are some of the entry barriers used in oligopolistic markets.
Non-Price Competition: Firms in an oligopoly are not allowed to compete based on prices. Firms need to use different types of non-price competition to compete effectively. Product differentiation, research and development, advertising, and branding are some of the strategies used in an oligopoly to differentiate the products from their competitors'.Thus, competition is limited in an oligopoly because of the interdependence between the firms, non-price competition, entry barriers, and pricing strategies.
Know more about oligopoly here:
https://brainly.com/question/29518761
#SPJ8
explain the role stare decisis likely played in the wesberry v. sanders decision. bolditalicunderline
. The court relied heavily on the precedent set by the earlier decision of Baker v. Carr (1962) that established the doctrine of "one person, one vote."
The court's ruling in Wesberry v. Sanders declared Georgia's congressional districts as unconstitutional because they were not evenly apportioned. The court held that the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause requires that congressional districts be apportioned by population.
The decision was anchored on the doctrine of stare decisis, which ensured consistency and uniformity in the court's decision-making process. Therefore, the principle of stare decisis played a vital role in the Wesberry v. Sanders ruling.
Learn more about court decision at:
https://brainly.com/question/23128341
#SPJ11
Stare decisis played a critical role in the Wesberry v. Sanders decision. It's essential to note that the principle of stare decisis has been critical in the legal sector, particularly in common law countries such as the United States of America.
Stare decisis is a legal principle in which judges are obligated to follow the previous court judgments and rulings when dealing with a legal issue. The objective of stare decisis is to offer certainty, predictability, and fairness in the judicial system. It is grounded on the belief that the law should be consistent over time. The principle of stare decisis played a critical role in Wesberry v. Sanders by upholding the precedent established in Baker v. Carr, where the Supreme Court concluded that the problem of apportionment was an issue justifiable in federal courts. The Wesberry v. Sanders decision established that "one person, one vote" should be applied to the election of members of the House of Representatives. Previously, there were disparities in the number of eligible voters in different Congressional districts. The "one person, one vote" principle requires that the weight of every vote be equal in Congressional districts, which leads to the most fair elections possible. Furthermore, the Court noted in the Wesberry v. Sanders case that the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment required that citizens have equal representation in Congress. Hence, the "one person, one vote" principle was established in accordance with the principle of stare decisis to ensure fairness and consistency in the judicial system.
To know more about Decisis, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/21085371
#SPJ11
2. The concept of one car length of space between two vehicles for every ten miles per hour is the most current method of computing following distance. True or false?
Answer:
False
Explanation:
It is the 3 second rule
The statement that the conception of one car length of space between two vehicles for every ten miles per hour is the most current method of computing following distance is false.
What is distance?Distance is defined as a numerical representation of the distance between two objects. The term “distance” can be called as the physical measurement or an estimate based on other factors.
The given statement is the case of 3-second rule, means allow three full seconds between yourself and the vehicle in front of any person.
This can be done by using a limited point leading such as a sign that see on the side of the road, and then count “one-thousand-one, one-thousand- two, one-thousand-three.
Therefore, the given statement is false.
To learn more about the distance, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/15172156
#SPJ2
When a condition operates to terminate a party's absolute promise to perform, it is called a:
a. condition precedent.
b. condition subsequent.
c. simultaneous condition.
d. concurrent condition.
When a condition operates to terminate a party's absolute promise to perform, it is called a condition subsequent.
A condition subsequent is a condition that, if it occurs, will terminate the party's obligation to perform. In contrast, a condition precedent is a condition that must be met before a party is obligated to perform, while a simultaneous condition is one that must occur at the same time as the party's performance. A concurrent condition is one that is dependent on the actions of both parties and must occur simultaneously for the performance to be completed.
In contract law, it is important to understand the different types of conditions that may affect the performance of the parties. A condition subsequent can be written into a contract to allow one or both parties to terminate their obligations under certain circumstances. This type of condition can provide a level of flexibility for the parties, while still ensuring that the terms of the agreement are met.
Overall, understanding the different types of conditions that can affect a contract is essential for ensuring that the parties' obligations are clearly defined and enforceable. By including specific conditions in a contract, parties can ensure that they are protected and that the terms of the agreement are met.
To know more about party's obligation
https://brainly.com/question/31360516
#SPJ11
CANADIAN LAW - What are three reasons why intoxication shouldn’t be used as a defence in a court of law?
Three reasons why intoxication shouldn’t be used as a defense in a court of law include:
Intoxication does not excuse criminal behavior.It is not fair to the victim to use intoxication to escape justice.Intoxication does not necessarily negate intent or premeditationWhy is intoxication not a defense ?A person is still responsible for their actions, even if they were under the influence of drugs or alcohol at the time of the crime. Intoxication can be used as a way to escape responsibility for committing a crime, which is not fair to the victim or society as a whole.
The presence of intent or premeditation, which are crucial elements in establishing the seriousness of a crime, is not always disproved by intoxication.
Find out more on intoxication at https://brainly.com/question/30279443
#SPJ1
The "No Pass, No Play" rules were reformed in 1995 so that if a student failed a course he or she must sit out of extracurricular activities for the next three weeks.
a. True
b. False
The given statement "The 'No Pass, No Play' rules were reformed in 1995 so that if a student failed a course he or she must sit out of extracurricular activities for the next three weeks" is false.
The 'No Pass, No Play' rules were initially implemented in Texas in the 1980s to set academic eligibility requirements for participation in extracurricular activities. However, reforms were indeed made in 1995 to relax these rules.
Under the reformed rules, if a student failed a course, they were required to attend a remedial program and were given the opportunity to regain eligibility within a shorter timeframe, typically within three weeks.
This change aimed to provide students with a chance to improve their academic performance and resume participation in extracurricular activities more quickly.
For more questions like Academic click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/30834356
#SPJ11
What do you like least in online distance learning
Answer:
We cannot interact with our friends and talk with them even tho we can ch at
We may get distracted by things around us
Explanation: