Answers
The term used to describe "Due Process" in our system of law is "fair treatment".
Due process is a fundamental principle of the United States legal system that requires the government to respect all legal rights of an individual. It ensures that a person is not deprived of their life, liberty, or property without fair treatment under the law.
"Fair treatment" is a term used to describe due process in simpler terms that emphasize the right of every person to a fair and impartial legal process.
The term "fair treatment" implies that every individual is entitled to a legal process that is unbiased and impartial, and that the government cannot arbitrarily take away their rights without due process of law.
For more questions like Law click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/6107503
#SPJ11
Related Questions
The sharing of both profits and losses creates a legal inference that a partnership exists.trueIn all cases, joint ownership of property creates a partnership.
false
Answers
True, The sharing of both profits and losses creates a legal inference that a partnership exists.
What is partnership ?A partnership is an agreement in which parties, known as business partners, agree to work together to further their mutual interests. Partnership partners are individuals, businesses, interest-based organizations, schools, governments, or a combination thereof.A partnership firm is by definition two or more people of hers who agree to combine resources to start a business and share in risks, profits and losses. Examples of joint partnerships include law firms, medical groups, real estate investment firms, and accounting groups.In summary, every partnership is unique, but every partnership should exhibit the above characteristics to ensure mutual success. Remember that both sides need to be communicative, approachable, flexible, supportive of each other, and achieve measurable results. These qualities are important for optimizing partnership agreements.To learn more about partnership from the given link :
https://brainly.com/question/19988417
#SPJ4
In 250 words or less, explain how the role and function of the legislative branch has changed over
time. Provide 2 specific examples.
Answers
Answer:
Changes in the Legislative Branch
Congress is the legislative branch of the federal government, the branch that makes the laws. The men who wrote the Constitution at a federal convention in summer 1787 created Congress to promote American commerce (business), protect property, and provide a strong military. (See chapter 3, "Constitutional Role of the Legislative Branch.") According to Howard Zinn in A People's History of the United States, by protecting property and promoting commerce, the Constitution did "enough for small property owners, for middle-income mechanics [skilled workers] and farmers, to build a broad base of support."
Answer:
basically the legislative branch is a senate which together from the United States Congress the senate is composed to 100 senators 2 for each state to be exact.
Explanation:
67. state laws differ on whether a buyer is entitled to know about:
Answers
Yes, state laws differ on whether a buyer is entitled to know about the condition of a property. In some states, buyers are entitled to certain disclosures from the seller that provide information on the condition of the property.
In other states, buyers may not be entitled to any disclosures or may be entitled to less information than in other states.
State laws differ on whether a buyer is entitled to know about various aspects of the property they are purchasing. This can include information about the condition of the property, any potential hazards, and any previous repairs or renovations.
Some states require sellers to disclose all known defects, while others only require disclosure of certain types of defects, such as structural or environmental issues.
It is important for buyers to be aware of the laws in their state and to ask the seller for any information that they are entitled to know under the law.
It is also important for sellers to be aware of their legal obligations and to provide buyers with all required disclosures. In general, it is always a good idea for both buyers and sellers to be transparent and honest about the condition of the property in order to avoid any potential legal disputes.
To know more buyer refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/13412366#
#SPJ11
which of the following is true in the context of sexual harassment laws in the united states?
Answers
The following is true In the context of sexual harassment laws in the United States, A. it is crucial to understand the legal framework that governs such conduct.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is the primary federal law that prohibits sexual harassment in the workplace. Under this law, sexual harassment is considered a form of sex discrimination, which is illegal in any work setting. There are two types of sexual harassment: quid pro quo and hostile work environment. Quid pro quo harassment occurs when a supervisor or someone with authority over an employee demands sexual favors in exchange for job benefits, such as a promotion or a raise. Hostile work environment harassment happens when unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature is so severe or pervasive that it creates an intimidating, offensive, or hostile work atmosphere, affecting an employee's job performance.
Employers are required to take all reasonable steps to prevent and address sexual harassment in their workplaces. This may include implementing policies and training programs, as well as promptly investigating complaints and taking appropriate action against the harasser. In conclusion, the true statement in the context of sexual harassment laws in the United States is that they protect employees from discriminatory conduct in the workplace and mandate employers to take measures to prevent and address such behaviors. So the correct answer is A. it is crucial to understand the legal framework that governs such conduct.
Learn more about sexual harassment at
https://brainly.com/question/9647226
#SPJ11
After a robbery why should you move away any place that a robber may have been?
Answers
After a robbery, we should leave the area where the robber may have been in order to protect the crime scene and the evidence.
What is the concept of the statement?Stealing from another person's person or immediate vicinity while using force or the threat of force with the purpose to steal aggravated robbery. The unjustifiable taking of someone else's property by using force or threatening to use force in order to instill fear.
Heists are defined as the theft of cash or valuable objects like artwork, jewellery, or silver. Under English and Welsh law, a robbery differs from a burglary in that a robbery entails the use of force which means that some of the heists commonly known as robberies were actually burglaries.
After a robbery, we should leave the area where the robber may have been in order to protect the crime scene and the evidence.
Thus, After a robbery, we should leave the area where the robber may have been in order.
For more details about concept of the statement, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/25976833
#SPJ2
This national survey is based on reports made to the police from crime victims.
a. Uniform Crime Reports b. National Crime Victimization Survey c. U.S. Census
d. Federal Criminal Justice Survey
Answers
The national survey based on reports made to the police from crime victims is the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS).
The NCVS is conducted by the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) and is designed to provide detailed information about the nature and extent of criminal victimization in the United States. Unlike the Uniform criminal Reports (UCR), which collects data on crimes reported to law enforcement agencies, the NCVS collects data directly from victims of crime. This allows the survey to capture crimes that are not reported to the police, as well as to provide more detailed information about the victimization experience.
The NCVS collects data on a range of criminal victimization, including , sexual assault, robbery, assault, theft, household burglary, and motor vehicle theft. The survey also collects information on the characteristics of victims and offenders, the nature of the crime, and the impact of victimization on victims and their households. The results of the survey are used by policymakers, researchers, and law enforcement officials to inform crime prevention and intervention strategies.
to learn more about national survey click here:
brainly.com/question/30763658
#SPJ11
How does the law provide protection and justice for individuals
Answers
Answer:
The relationship between law and justice is unbreakable and there is a direct relationship between the two. It is also highly believed that they are two faces of a coin. And many people consider the proper implementation of laws as a justice. However, all laws are not just laws and entitle rights to all human beings.
Write a 3-5 sentence essay answering the following question.
Two cops stop you while walking down the street because you ‘match the description’ of someone who committed a crime nearby. You haven't, but they proceed to question and accuse you, saying they're going to bring you in. What do you do?
Answers
Answer:
Say you don't want to speak till you get a lawyer. That they are wrong you are gonna sue them for wrongful prosuction. Then when you get your lawyer state you alibia and how your not guilty.
Explanation:
Answer:
Hold on a sec I got it
An accident occurs between a truck and a family vehicle. The truck is owned by a corporation with businesses in Ohio and Pennsylvania. The truck driver is from Ohio. The corporation is incorporated in Delaware but is headquartered in Pennsylvania. The family members in the vehicle include a grandmother domiciled in New Jersey and a mother and daughter domiciled in Connecticut. The accident occurs in New York. The family sues the corporation.
Is there federal jurisdiction?
What states have jurisdiction? (Assume that subject matter jurisdiction requires the incident or the residents of all defendants to be in the state of suit. )
Answers
The United States of America is a federal republic made up of 50 states, a federal district (Washington, D.C., the nation's capital), five major territories, and numerous minor islands.
The states, as well as the United States as a whole, are both sovereign jurisdictions. Any state, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any American territory falls under the jurisdiction of the United States. England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland are the three legal jurisdictions of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Learn more about jurisdictions
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ4
What does “unanimous” mean? Why do you think jury verdicts must be unanimous?
Answers
One technique to guarantee that a defendant won't be found guilty unless the prosecution has proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt is to have.
What is court?A court is any person or institution with the jurisdiction to arbitrate legal disputes between parties and administer justice in civil, criminal, and administrative affairs in conformity with the rule of law. A court, often known as a court of law, is a person or group of people with the legal jurisdiction to hear and settle disputes in civil, criminal, ecclesiastical, or military issues.
A unanimous jury verdict. To successfully convict a criminal defendant, prosecutors must persuade the jury that there is no possibility of reasonable doubt in their minds.
Therefore, By, “unanimous” means being of one thought; receiving the assent and agreement of all. indisputably.
Learn more about the court here:
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ2
What happens for your first DUI offense in Tennessee?.
Answers
First offense: up to 11 months 29 days in jail, $350-$1000 in fines, DUI school or a victim impact panel, and maybe an ignition interlock device (IID). if BAC is above, mandatory 7-day prison sentence. 20%. License suspension for a year.
In Tennessee, is a first offense DUI a felony?In Tennessee, a DUI is a class A misdemeanor, but after the fourth offense, it becomes a class E felony. The maximum jail sentence for the first three DUI convictions is eleven months and twenty-nine days.
Can a DUI be overturned in Tennessee?DUI convictions in Tennessee are permanently entered into the public record and cannot ever be removed.
What happens if you commit a DUI for the first time in Tennessee?For those who violate 55-10-401, penalties range from 48 hours to 11 months and 29 days.7 days in jail minimum if blood alcohol content is.20 or higher1 year license suspension with the option of a restricted licenseYou will be required to enroll in an alcohol and drug rehabilitation program.Pay compensation to anyone who suffers property damage or a personal loss. $350-$1,500 fineYour first offense average expenses might total $4,900 including towing, bail, an attorney, high risk insurance, court costs, school fees, and reinstatement costs.At your expense, an ignition interlock device was placed. Costs for the first year could be higher than $1,000.00.Ignition interlock device necessary for 6 months after reinstatement at your expense if two (2) DUI convictions within five years.The judge may decide to impose a need for drug and alcohol treatment.Learn more about DUI convictions: https://brainly.com/question/18035496
#SPJ4
true or false? justification defenses provide that acts that are ordinarily criminal are justified or carry no criminal liability under certain circumstances.
Answers
Answer:
False
Explanation:
A psychopath is a person with a personality disorder, especially one manifested in
aggressively antisocial behavior, which is often said to be the result of a poorly
developed superego.
True
False
Answers
Answer:
A. True
Hope this helps
Statutes and regulations governing Florida attorneys prohibit targeted solicitations to victims and and their relatives for thirty days following an accident or disaster. Noted "ambulance chasing" lawyer Rufus T. Firefly or his agents routinely contact accident victims as soon as possible following an accident in the hospital cafeteria for example. Mr. Firefly has filed suit seeking to have these provisions declared invalid. Discuss whether the Florida limitation upon Mr. Firefly and other Florida lawyers is valid under the US Constitution.
Answers
Answer:
This is valid and legal
Explanation:
under the united States constitution this florida limitation is valid. in a case that involved florida bar vs went for it, the supreme court has ruled that the state can shield harmed floridians from lawyers. the supreme court ruling is that states have a control over forceful lawyers who would want to send such solicitation letters during a period of 30 days to accident victims and their families.
substantive law: sets the rules by wehich one may enforce his rights under the law. None of these choices. defines, regulates, and creates a legal relationship or prohibits certain conduct. is the same thing as procedural law.
Answers
Substantive law is a type of law that defines, regulates, and creates legal relationships, as well as prohibits certain conduct.
It sets the rules by which one may enforce their rights under the law. This is different from procedural law, which focuses on the processes and procedures involved in the legal system.
Substantive law helps to establish and maintain a just and orderly society by clearly outlining the rights and responsibilities of individuals and organizations.
In summary, substantive law is essential for defining and regulating legal relationships and conduct, while procedural law ensures that the legal system operates effectively and fairly.
To know more about Substantive law refer here: https://brainly.com/question/30673552#
#SPJ11
Helppp please!
From the standpoint of labeling theory, deviance and crime are not absolutes - a behavior can be called deviant or criminal only when it violates the norms of some group. Obviously, this suggests that definitions of deviance will change as societies advance.
Discuss what behaviors now considered acceptable were formerly thought to be deviant or criminal.
Are there any now considered deviant or criminal that were once considered acceptable?
Is there a trend toward defining more behaviors as deviant and criminal or more as acceptable?
Do you detect any trends in the process of change? If so, what are they?
Answers
According to the labeling theory, authorities' labels have a negative impact on the powerless and lead to criminal and deviant behavior.
Labeling is a crucial idea related to official bias in intergenerational transmission. According to the labeling theory, criminal justice reforms tend to make offenders worse. To be more specific, labeling happens when someone's criminal behavior worsens after being involved in the justice system. The labeling theory proposes that when a label for deviance is placed on a person, that person adopts the label by engaging in the behaviors, actions, and attitudes that are associated with the label. According to the labeling theory, when others impose an identity on someone, that person becomes deviant.To know more about crime here
https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ1
In the United States, which of the following is a rule on voting found in the Constitution or its amendments?
A No person may be denied the right to vote merely for lack of either state or federal citizenship.
B No person eighteen years of age or older may be denied the right to vote on account of age.
C No person may be denied the right to vote merely because he or she has previously served a prison sentence.
D A state may not establish a residency requirement for voting.
E A state may require a person to pay a poll tax in order to register to vote.
Answers
In the United States, a rule on voting found in the Constitution or its amendments is No person eighteen years of age or older may be denied the right to vote on account of age. Thus the correct option is C.
What is an Amendment?An Amendment refers to any alteration or modification taken place in existing laws to support the welfare of the people living in the country by improving the objective for better implementation.
The Twenty-sixth Amendment to the United States Explicitly forbade the federal government and the states from claiming age as a justification for refusing residents of the United States who are at least eighteen years old the right to vote.
Therefore, the option C Is appropriate.
Learn more about Twenty-sixth Amendment, here:
https://brainly.com/question/3307756
#SPJ1
suppose you wanted to poll citizens of the u.s. and canada to estimate the number of people who caught covid19 in 2021. you do this by first estimating the percentage of population with covid19 and then multiplying that estimate by the population of each country. the u.s. has a population of about 328 million, while canada has a population of about 38 million. other things being equal, how many people would you need to poll in each country so that your level of accuracy in number of people with covid19 was comparable between the two countries? group of answer choices A. more information is needed. B. you should poll the same number of people in the u.s. and canada
C.. you should poll more people in canada. D. you should poll more people in the u.s.
Answers
C. You should poll more people in Canada.
Should the number of people polled differ?To estimate the number of people who caught COVID-19 in the U.S. and Canada in 2021, the accuracy of the estimation depends on the percentage of the population surveyed. Since the population of the U.S. is significantly larger than that of Canada, it is necessary to poll a larger number of people in Canada to achieve a comparable level of accuracy between the two countries.
In this scenario, the U.S. has a population of approximately 328 million, while Canada has a population of around 38 million. When estimating the percentage of the population with COVID-19, sampling a fixed number of individuals in each country would result in a larger relative sample size in the U.S. compared to Canada.
To ensure a comparable level of accuracy in estimating the number of people with COVID-19 in both countries, it is necessary to poll a larger number of people in Canada. This compensates for the smaller population size and helps minimize the potential margin of error in the estimation. By doing so, the statistical representation of the surveyed individuals becomes more proportional to the population, increasing the reliability of the estimated percentages.
Learn more about Sample size determination
brainly.com/question/11129327
#SPJ11
A relationship created by an implied or an express agreement or by law, that empowers one of the parties by word or action to legally bind the other is a(n) _______________________.
Answers
The answer is "agency relationship". An agency relationship is created when one party, known as the agent, is authorized to act on behalf of another party, known as the principal, through an implied or express agreement or by law. The agent has the power to legally bind the principal through their actions or words, and the principal is responsible for the actions of the agent within the scope of their authority.
Agency relationship is a type of legal relationship where one person or entity acts as a representative for another person or entity. This relationship is created by mutual consent between the agent and the principal and can be formed through various means, such as a written contract, oral agreement, or through the actions of the parties.
The agent is authorized to act on behalf of the principal and can make legally binding decisions and enter into contracts on their behalf. The principal is responsible for any actions taken by the agent within the scope of their authority and is also responsible for providing the agent with the necessary resources to carry out their duties.
To know more about agency relationship visit:
brainly.com/question/15129864
#SPJ11
john and dave sign a written contract that is completely integrated. john claims that they orally agreed to various terms, as well. he testified that they orally agreed to 1) a different term hat what appears in teh writing prior to the drafting and signing of the contract
Answers
Under the parole evidence rule, a court would generally permit the use of evidence to prove the third oral agreement that significantly altered the contract about a month after the signing. Statement 3 is
A court would typically allow the use of evidence to prove the third oral agreement that materially alters the contract about a month after the signing under the parole evidence rule (point 3). This is due to the fact that evidence of earlier or more recent oral agreements that conflict with or differ from the terms of a fully integrated written contract is typically prohibited under the parole evidence rule.
Oral agreements made subsequently after the signing might be considered admissible to demonstrate changes or additions to the initial contract. As a result, evidence of the third oral agreement may be used to show how the contract was changed. Points 1 and 2 which involve verbal agreements before and during the contract's signing would typically be excluded under the rule against circumstantial evidence.
To know more about parole evidence rule here
brainly.com/question/32356110
#SPJ4
The complete question is "john and dave sign a written contract that is completely integrated. john claims that they orally agreed to various terms, as well. he testifies that they orally agreed to: (1) a different term than what appears in the writing prior to the drafting and signing of the contract; (2) an additional term to what appears in the writing while they were signing the document; and (3) a term that significantly altered the contract about a month after the signing. a court applying the parol evidence rule would generally permit the use of evidence to prove which of those oral agreements?"
can someone help me with this question please.
Assuming that each of the following pieces of evidence is admissible, including a reliably documented chain of custody, which would NOT be useful in determining the facts of the case?
A. A photograph of the crime scene
B. Matching DNA test from blood at the scene and a hair sample from a suspect
C. An eye witness who says she thought she recognized that someone at the scene looks like the accused
D. A neighbor who says that the accused was known to have drugs when she was in high school
Answers
Answer: C
Explanation: The women wouldn’t be helpful cause she thought she saw a suspect but she didn’t cause she don’t remember. if she doesn’t remember then she would be useful at all
what legal defense to a conspiracy charge claims that the person charged with conspiracy never actually intended to commit a crime and faked their intent to do so?
Answers
Feigned agreement legal defense to a conspiracy charge claims that the person charged with conspiracy never actually intended to commit a crime and faked their intent to do so.
An action that is not carried out through unlawful means; such a deal is referred to as a criminal conspiracy: However, unless another act is performed in accordance with the agreement by one or more of the parties, no agreement—aside from an agreement to commit an offense—shall constitute a criminal conspiracy.
Feigned Agreement: A person accused of a crime may attempt to demonstrate that the agreement made to commit a crime was feigned or fake in order to defend themselves against a conspiracy charge. This will render the requirement of specific intent irrelevant for the commission of the actual crime.
Learn more about criminal conspiracy at:
brainly.com/question/26276616
#SPJ4
Under Article 2 of the UCC, why does it matter whether a party to a contract is a merchant?
1) It is the test for applying Article 2 of the UCC.
2) Merchants sometimes are treated differently than other parties.
3) All contracts in which one or both parties are merchants are handled under Article 2A of the UCC.
4) Article 2 does not concern itself with cases regarding the transactions of goods.
Answers
Under Article 2 of the UCC, it matters whether a party to a contract is a merchant because it is the test for applying Article 2 of the UCC.
Article 2 of the UCC deals with the sale of goods and applies only to contracts involving the sale of goods between merchants or between a merchant and a non-merchant. Merchants are sometimes treated differently than other parties because they are assumed to have more experience and knowledge in the sale of goods. All contracts in which one or both parties are merchants are handled under Article 2 of the UCC. Article 2 does concern itself with cases regarding the transactions of goods and sets forth specific rules and requirements for such transactions, including warranties, delivery, and payment terms. Therefore, understanding the status of the parties involved as merchants or non-merchants is essential in determining the applicability of Article 2 of the UCC.
To learn more about contract, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30626918
#SPJ11
I NEED HELP ASAP LIKE RIGHT NOW I BE THANKFUL ENOUGH but this is basically a psychology question
Answers
Answer:
Both answers to me look like the first option!
Explanation:
Anytime a juror sees any type of literature before a trial about the accused, it will definitely effect how they feel about the accused no matter what the person does to not let it influence their opinion.
The second question will give a consultant the ability to tell the attorneys what type of people to try and get on their jury. For instance, in the OJ Simpson trial, the jury consultant for the defense instructed the defense to pick as many African-American women as possible, as their surveys showed that they were the most sympathetic to Mr. Simpson.
What is a correlation? What is a statistically significant correlation?
Answers
Explanation:
Statistical significance is indicated with a p-value.
Therefore, correlations are typically written with two key numbers: r = and p = .
Who is the complainant in a sexual assault case ?
Answers
Answer:
the one whom was assaulted ?
Explanation:
the legal bac limit in all 50 u.s. states and the district of columbia is
Answers
The legal blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia is 0.08%.
The legal blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia is 0.08%. This means that if a driver's BAC is 0.08% or higher, they are considered legally intoxicated and can be charged with driving under the influence (DUI) or driving while intoxicated (DWI).
However, it's important to note that there are some variations in the laws between states.
For example, some states have lower BAC limits for drivers under the age of 21, or for drivers who hold a commercial driver's license. Additionally, some states have stricter penalties for repeat offenders or for drivers with extremely high BAC levels.
It's also worth mentioning that the legal BAC limit is not a safe level of alcohol consumption for driving.
Even at levels below 0.08%, alcohol can impair judgment, reaction time, and coordination, making it dangerous to operate a vehicle. The best way to avoid a DUI or DWI charge is to refrain from drinking alcohol before getting behind the wheel.
For more such questions on blood alcohol concentration
https://brainly.com/question/13614186
#SPJ11
if a country has an independently elected president, then we necessarily consider it to be a presidential regime. True or false?
Answers
Answer:
I believe that is false
Explanation:
how should moral deliberation proceed according to collins?
Answers
According to philosopher Ronald K. Collins, moral deliberation should proceed through a process of reflective equilibrium. This involves balancing our moral intuitions and principles to arrive at a coherent and justifiable moral position.
To proceed with moral deliberation according to Collins, the following steps can be taken:
Identify moral intuitions: Begin by identifying your own moral intuitions, as well as those of others involved in the situation. These intuitions may be based on personal experience, cultural norms, religious beliefs, or other factors.Formulate moral principles: Next, formulate general moral principles that can explain and justify the intuitions identified in step 1. These principles should be clear, concise, and applicable to a wide range of moral situations.Test for coherence: Check whether the moral principles developed in step 2 cohere with one another and with other moral beliefs you hold. This involves testing whether the principles are internally consistent and do not contradict each other.Test for justification: Finally, test whether the moral principles developed in step 2 are justifiable in the face of objections. This involves considering counterexamples, alternative principles, and objections to the moral principles developed in earlier steps.Overall, according to Collins, moral deliberation should proceed through a process of reflective equilibrium, in which moral intuitions are balanced against moral principles, and coherence and justification are tested through careful reflection and discussion.
Learn More About moral deliberation
https://brainly.com/question/29408053
#SPJ11
federal courts have exclusive subject matter jurisdiction over which of the following? choose 2 answer choices.
Answers
Copyright, trademark, and patent cases.
What is meant by Copyright?Copyright is a type of intellectual property that protects original works of authorship as soon as they are written down and put into a tangible form.
Copyright is an automatic right that can be applied to a wide range of material creative works. It gives people who make original works the right to control how others use their work for a set amount of time.
The various kinds of copyrights that are available in India are as follows:
Works of literature. Works that include literary creations that are original or one-of-a-kind are covered by copyrights in this category.Works of Drama. This is also a type of writingWork in MusicWorks of Art.Cinematograph PicturesAudio recordingTo know more about Copyright, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/22399852
#SPJ4