analyses conducted by police to determine the level of future danger that a victim of domestic violence may be in are known as:

Answer:

a person who strongly identifies with their own nation and vigorously supports its interests, especially to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations

Answer: a person who strongly identifies with their own nation and supports its interest

Explanation:

Answer:

1) The Ombudsman may on a complaint by any aggrieved person, on a reference by the Government or the Provincial Assembly, or on a motion of the Supreme Court or the High Court made during the course of any proceedings before it or of his own motion, undertake any investigation into any allegation of maladministration on the part of any Agency or any of its officers or employees:

Provided that the Ombudsman shall not have any jurisdiction to investigate or inquire into any matters which:-

(a) are subjudice before a Court of competent jurisdiction on the date of the receipt of a complaint, reference or motion by him or

(b) relate to the external affairs of Pakistan or the relations or dealings of Pakistan with any foreign state or Government; or

(c) relate to, or are connected with, the defence of Pakistan or any part thereof, the Military, Naval and Air Forces of Pakistan, or the matters covered by the laws relating to those forces.

(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in subsection (1), the Ombudsman shall not entertain for investigation any complaint by or on behalf of a public servant or functionary concerning any matters relating to the Agency in which he is, or has been, working, in respect of any personal grievance relating to his service therein.

(3) For carrying out the objectives of this Act and, in particular for ascertaining the root causes of corrupt practices and injustice, the Ombudsman may arrange for studies to be made or research to be conducted and may recommend appropriate steps for their eradication.

Functions

The law empowers the Ombudsman Punjab to entertain complaints against any department, commission or office of the Provincial Government or a statutory corporation or other institution established or controlled by the Provincial Government but does not include the High Court and the Courts working under the supervision of High Court and Provincial Assembly and its Secretariat.

Under section 9(1) of the Act the Ombudsman on a complaint of any aggrieved person, on a reference by the Government or the Provincial Assembly or on a motion of Supreme Court or the High Court or on his own motion (suo moto) can undertake any investigation into any allegation of ‘maladministration’ on the part of any agency or its officers or employees.

The Ombudsman, however, has no jurisdiction to investigate or enquire into matters which are (a) subjudice before a court of competent jurisdiction (b) relates to the external relations of Pakistan or connected with defence of Pakistan or Military, Naval and Air Force of Pakistan or the matters covered by the laws relating to these Forces. The Ombudsman also cannot entertain for investigation any complaint by or on behalf of a public servant or functionary concerning any matter relating to the agency in which the public servant has been or is working in respect of any personal grievance or relating to his service therein.

Powers

Ombudsman has the same powers as are vested in a Civil Court under the code of civil procedure for summoning and enforcing the attendance of any person; compelling the production of documents; receiving evidence on affidavits and issuing commission for examination of witnesses. The Ombudsman is vested with the powers to enter and search any premises and inspect any article, books of account and other documents; impound and seal such article. The Ombudsman has the same powers, mutatis mutandis, as the High Court has to punish any person for its contempt.

The US Constitution creates dual sovereignty in the federal system by dividing powers between the federal government and the state governments.

The Constitution grants certain powers to the federal government, such as the power to regulate commerce between states, coin money, and provide for the common defense, while reserving other powers to the states, such as the power to regulate intrastate commerce, education, and law enforcement.

This division of powers ensures that both the federal government and state governments exercise their own sovereignty and control over specific policy areas, creating a federal system of government with dual sovereignty.

Learn more about US constitution at:

https://brainly.com/question/28768341

#SPJ1

The legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario are the Breach of Contract and Contractual Remedies. Valerie has a case in this scenario.

What can be done to solve the problem in this scenario is that a demand letter can be sent to Major Tom’s Ground Control company. This letter should indicate that they breached the contract by failing to clean the property after completing the work and that she will not be paying the balance of $5000.00. In addition, Valerie should include that she is willing to pay a fair amount to have another company come in and clean up the property. Finally, she could inform Major Tom’s Ground Control that if they fail to comply with her demands, she will take legal action against them.

It is necessary to note that a demand letter should be sent with registered mail. This ensures that the letter is received by the intended recipient. If the letter is ignored, Valerie may need to file a claim in Small Claims Court. The evidence to support her claim includes the contract, deposit, pictures of the property, the demand letter, and any other correspondence between her and Major Tom's Ground Control.

Learn more about Small Claims Court: https://brainly.com/question/16507110

#SPJ11

Answer:

Democracy, meaning "rule of the people", is a system of government in which the citizens exercise power directly or elect representatives from among themselves to form a governing body, such as a parliament. Democracy is sometimes referred to as "rule of the majority".

Explanation:

Answer:

Restaurant Tax

Explanation:

When you get a paycheck it shows you what is deducted, from where and where it goes to, another thing is though the last option may seem like the answer it is not according to charities.org they said this about the last answer "By giving through recurring or one-time payroll deduction, your donation is automatically deducted from your paycheck, there are no extra fees and because employees' payroll donations come out of their after-tax earnings, their donation is tax-deductible."

I myself know this because of pay stubs, every time you get paid there is a small paper attached it shows the summary of your yearly income, pay per hour, and taxes deducted from the paycheck,

If Restaurant Tax is wrong then it is the last options, B and C is possible no matter what, but it varies among states, im from hawaii and we dont have option D deducted from our paycheck it isn't even a option and neither is option A deducted it doesn't exist.

Hope this helps !

The given statement "The Supreme Court has no discretion over the cases it hears each term." is false because the Supreme Court does have discretion over the cases it hears each term.

The Court exercises this discretion through a process known as "granting certiorari" or "granting cert." The Court receives a vast number of requests, known as petitions for writs of certiorari, from parties seeking the Court's review of lower court decisions.

The Supreme Court has the authority to choose which cases it will hear, and it typically selects cases that raise significant legal questions, involve conflicting interpretations of federal law, or present constitutional issues of national importance. The Court's discretionary power allows it to prioritize cases that have the potential to impact the interpretation of laws and shape legal precedents.

The Court's discretion is crucial for managing its workload and ensuring that it focuses on cases that warrant the attention of the highest court in the land. The Court receives thousands of petitions each year but only grants certiorari to a limited number of cases, typically around 100 or fewer.

Know more about Supreme Court here:

https://brainly.com/question/29759733

#SPJ11

Answer: yes that is true but whats the question

Explanation:

Answer:

$0.78 i think

Explanation:

Answer:

12.235

Explanation:

BECAUSE

Answer:

21

Explanation:

it says it on goo gle, looking at 2022 info

Answer:

attorneys

Explanation:

i took the test

C)A court that does not typically hear original trials, but whose opinions are regularly reviewed by other state courts is likely to be a(n) Intermediate Appellate Court

An intermediate appellate court is a court that does not typically hear original trials but focuses on reviewing the decisions and opinions of lower courts. Its primary function is to review and consider appeals from trial courts or lower appellate courts. The opinions rendered by an intermediate appellate court serve as guidance for other state courts, as they establish precedent and can influence future cases. These courts play a crucial role in the judicial system by ensuring consistency and uniformity in the interpretation and application of the law.

To read more about Intermediate Appellate Court click here

https://brainly.com/question/33718034

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

The 2001 terrorist attack refers to the coordinated series of attacks carried out by the terrorist group al-Qaeda on September 11, 2001. The attacks involved four hijacked planes, two of which were flown into the World Trade Center towers in New York City, one into the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, and one crashed in a field in Pennsylvania after passengers attempted to retake control of the plane from the hijackers.

The attacks were considered terror because they were intended to cause mass destruction and fear among the population, with the aim of advancing the political and religious objectives of the group responsible.

The motives of the responsible group, al-Qaeda, were to strike a blow against the United States, whom they saw as an enemy of Islam, and to advance their ultimate goal of establishing a global caliphate under Sharia law.

The group's leader was Osama bin Laden, a Saudi Arabian extremist who had previously fought against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan during the 1980s. Bin Laden founded al-Qaeda in the late 1980s with the aim of waging a global jihad against non-Muslim powers, particularly the United States.

The individuals who carried out the attacks were primarily Saudi Arabian citizens who had been trained and indoctrinated by al-Qaeda. The hijackers were led by Mohamed Atta, an Egyptian national who had become radicalized while studying in Germany.

The attack was carried out in a coordinated manner, with the hijackers taking control of the planes using box cutters and other weapons, and then steering them towards their intended targets. The attack on the World Trade Center towers involved the use of passenger planes as missiles, causing both towers to collapse and resulting in the deaths of nearly 3,000 people. The attack on the Pentagon resulted in significant damage to the building, and the crash in Pennsylvania prevented the hijackers from reaching their intended target, believed to be either the White House or the U.S. Capitol building.

Answer: hello the options related to your question is missing below is the missing option

a. not further a legitimate local interest.

b. not discriminate in favor of local interests and against out-of-state interests.

c. allow only direct, not incidental, regulation of interstate commerce.

d. impose costs on interstate commerce that are more excessive than necessary to bring about the state interests.

answer:

Not discriminate in favor of local interests and against out of state interests

( B )

Explanation:

The state statue must not discriminate in favor of local interests and against out of state interests,

The commerce clause as enshrined in the constitution during the Tenth amendment does not grant  the power to the states to regulate interstate economic activities without discrimination.  it also serves as a grant power to congress, hence the states where granted powers to regulate interstate commerce

The officers drove the car to the police station garage. In this scenario the officers may search it immediately.

Most fair treatment prerequisites of significance to police work concern three significant regions: (1) proof and examination (frequently called search and seizure), (2) capture, and (3) cross examination.

The expression "policing", incorporates all officials of the law, whether named or chose, who exercise police powers, particularly the powers of capture or detainment.

In nations where police powers are practiced by military specialists, regardless of whether formally dressed, or by State security powers, the meaning of policing will be viewed as including officials of such administrations.

Administration to the local area is expected to incorporate especially the version of administrations of help to those individuals from the local area who by reason of individual, monetary, social or different crises are needing prompt guide.

This arrangement is planned to cover all rough, ruthless and hurtful demonstrations, however it stretches out to the full scope of restrictions under corrective statutes. It reaches out to lead by people not fit for causing criminal liability.

to know more about criminal liability click here:

https://brainly.com/question/14567423

#SPJ4

A putative marriage is an apparently valid marriage performed in good faith on the part of at least one of the spouses but is legally invalid due to a technical impediment, such as a pre-existing marriage of one party.

The term "putative marriage", as used in this article, means an authentic marriage by a person claiming to be a hypothetical spouse, null and void by reason of impediment. this person did not know but still existed at that time. of trying to get married.

A putative marriage can be a hypothetical marriage. Presumptive marriage has some consequences for civil marriage. For the nullity of marriage hypothesis, one or both parties must let go of what made their marriage null and void.

Learn more about putative marriage here: https://brainly.com/question/9275150

#SPJ9

— Ethics are a set of moral values an individual establishes for one's self and your own personal behavior. Laws are structured rules utilized to govern all of society. Differences between right and wrong or good and bad behavior. Laws are the rules a country or community mandates its citizens follow in order to regulate society. Religion is a structure of faith and worship. It's a belief system based on faith in a supernatural power.

pa brainlest po:) ThankYou

Hope it helps in you, GOODLUCK!

Answer:

Explanation:

Answer:

v = 0.8 m/s (west)

Explanation:

Given that,

An animal runs 4 meters east, and then 4 meters west, all in 10 seconds.

We need to find animal's velocity.

Displacement of animal = final position - initial position

= -4-4

= - 8 m

Average velocity = total displacement/time

So,

\(v=\dfrac{-8}{10}\\\\v=-0.8\ m/s\)

So, the animal's velocity is 0.8 m/s due west.

Lew has been liable to reimburse the amount to the holder due in course, it related parties and the actual holders of the check.

Option D is correct.

A drawer is referring to person who has created a check in the name of another person or any financial institution like banks.

According to the situation, the drawer of the stolen check is found to be Lew due to forged name put up by Kira. This shows that Lew is now become obligated towards all the parties in connection with the payment of amount being stated in the check.

Therefore, the ordinary holders, Holder due in course and its related parties are beneficial to be get reimbursed by Lew.

Learn more about the bank checks in the related link:

https://brainly.com/question/9892102

#SPJ2

Answer:

Ur right

Explanation:

We should never bully anyone

Answer:

That's sweet but learn to put a TW lol

Explanation:

Answer:

The law of demand states that a higher price leads to a lower quantity demanded and that a lower price leads to a higher quantity demanded.

Explanation:

Easy

:)

Answer: A. make the scene safe, secure the scene, document the scene, collect the evidence.

Explanation: trust

Rosa should present in the order of option (C). Secure the scene. Make the scene safe. Document the scene. Collect evidence

A thorough crime scene examination can turn a chaotic crime scene into hard evidence. Findings can point the law enforcement officers in the right direction, and eventually, help solidify case.

A good examiner will:

Hence, Rosa should present in the order of option (C). Secure the scene. Make the scene safe. Document the scene. Collect evidence

To know more about crime scene investigation:

https://brainly.com/question/1329009

#SPJ3

In some situations, the law specifies the duty of care individuals owe to others, establishing a legal obligation to act responsibly and avoid causing harm.

In some situations, the law does specify the duty of care that one individual owes to another. The concept of duty of care is a legal obligation that requires individuals or entities to act in a manner that avoids causing harm or injury to others. It establishes a standard of reasonable care that individuals must meet in their interactions and activities.

The duty of care can arise in various contexts, such as personal relationships, professional settings, or societal interactions. For example, in a doctor-patient relationship, the law imposes a duty of care on the healthcare provider to act in a manner consistent with accepted medical standards and to ensure the well-being and safety of the patient.

Similarly, in a landlord-tenant relationship, the landlord has a duty of care to maintain the property in a safe condition and address any hazards that could potentially harm the tenant. In the workplace, employers have a duty of care to provide a safe and healthy work environment, including taking necessary precautions to prevent workplace accidents or injuries.

The specific duty of care can vary depending on the circumstances, the nature of the relationship, and the applicable laws or regulations. Courts often consider factors such as foreseeability, the reasonable person standard, and the level of expertise or knowledge of the individuals involved when determining the extent of the duty of care.

When a duty of care is established, individuals or entities who breach that duty and cause harm or injury to another may be held legally liable for their actions or negligence. This can result in legal consequences such as financial compensation for damages or injunctions to prevent future harm.

In summary, in certain situations, the law does specify the duty of care that individuals owe to others. The duty of care is a legal obligation to act reasonably and responsibly, avoiding harm to others, and its scope can vary depending on the specific circumstances and relationships involved.

To learn more about legal obligation refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/988013

#SPJ11

Answer:

Enforce.

Explanition:

By this, they are enforcing rules. Aka "leading by example."