Answer:
federal government is a type of government powering up the nation into different level.but its not termed as a constitution .
so i thik the answer is federal government.
Project: Understanding the Advantages and Risks of Collaborations Between Private Security and Law Enforcement Agencies
As you have learned in this lesson, there are advantages to collaborations between private security and law enforcement agencies. Sharing of resources, information, and training strengthen these collaborations. There are also some drawbacks and potential risks in these collaborations. In this exercise, you will read an article written by an expert in these matters and make an argument for whether you think the benefits outweigh the risks or if the risks outweigh the benefits.
Instructions
Begin by reading Public-Private Partnerships in Homeland Security: Opportunities and Challenges.
If you have any difficulty with vocabulary or sentences, get clarification from your instructor.
After you have read the article, write an editorial that might appear in a local newspaper expressing your opinion about the advantages or disadvantages collaborations between private security and law enforcement agencies.
Assume that your editorial has prompted much public discussion and that you have been asked to make a presentation setting forward your opinion to a group of civic leaders. Your speech should be at least five minutes in length and address the more important points in your original editorial.
Question # 1
File Upload
Submit your editorial article expressing your opinion about the advantages and disadvantages of collaboration between private security and law enforcement.
In addition, submit your five-minute speech in which you present your opinion to a group of civic leaders. Make sure that your speech addresses the important points in your original editorial.
The editorial that might appear in a local newspaper expressing your opinion about the advantages or disadvantages collaborations between private security and law enforcement agencies is given below
What is the collaborations between private security and law enforcement agencies?There has been consistent rise in the extent of crime been committed by people. More formal collaborations are created to handle more particular or comprehensive demands, such as the defense of vital infrastructure against terrorist threats or the requirement for more workers to combat pervasive crime.
More formal collaborations are created to handle more particular or comprehensive demands, such as the defense of vital infrastructure against terrorist threats or the requirement for more workers to combat pervasive crime.
The partnership can go far beyond information exchange to encompass preventive and investigative activities as well as improved emergency response to events like workplace violence, natural disasters, and terrorism. This is true of any public-private interaction.
Lastly, the disadvantages in the collaborations between private security and law enforcement is that law enforcement database or information may be breached by private selfish firm and used for other purposes.
Hence, to ensure private security and local law enforcement can collaborate, In regards to sharing information: Private security and law enforcement can share information about threats, incidents, and investigations. This will help them to stay informed about potential dangers and be better prepared to respond if necessary.
Learn more about private security from
https://brainly.com/question/14327993
#SPJ1
(5) What is military time for 12:01 am?
Answer:
12 01 is the answer may i please get brainly
who rules with the minority or dissents in the supreme court case tinker v. des moines
The students with their family, who were defended by the ACLU, engaged in a four-year legal dispute that resulted in the historic Supreme Court ruling. Rookie attorney Dan Johnston, who comes from Des Moines and recently graduated from law school, presented the case.
The US Supreme Court ruled in support of the students in a 7-2 ruling in 1969. Students don't give up their civil protections at the campus gates, the high court ruled, agreeing that they should be preserved.
If you give false information on your driver license application, your license will be _____.
Answer:
Your license will be canceled for 60 days or until the correct information is found
Explanation:
Answer:
canceled or suspended
Explanation:
What the Executive Order must state:
Answer:
Executive Orders state mandatory requirements for the Executive Branch, and have the effect of law. They are issued in relation to a law passed by Congress or based on powers granted to the President in the Constitution and must be consistent with those authorities.
Explanation:
5 scarves 2 of them are green if he chooses 1 scarf at random what is the probabillity its green write your answer as a fraction and a decimal
which type of criminal intelligence do you think poses the highest risk of civil rights infringement
Answer:
Investigation phase can cause highest risk of civil right infringement. However, this depends on how discretely the intelligence is collected. Obviously, When we are aware of it, we can become threatened, curtailing our right to free speech and other fundamental rights
Investigation includes running surveillance, wire tapping, monitoring on all and trying to charge them with vital crimes if they never give the facts.
The Hacking intelligence
Did you know anything about Gerrymandering? Was any of this information surprising to you? Why or why not?
Gerrymandering is the practice of redrawing election districts to favour a certain political party. Although the magnitude and effect may not be shocking, they often are.
I am aware of gerrymandering, which is the act of influencing an election constituency's borders in order to favour one political party or organisation over another. This is done to make sure that the ruling party can continue to win most of the elections.
This did not come as a surprise to me considering that gerrymandering has long been a contentious topic in many nations, including the US. Even yet, the amount to which it is applied and the effects it has on representation and democracy may be surprising.
Learn more about Gerrymandering:
https://brainly.com/question/29553293
#SPJ1
A forged deed is:
A. voidable.
B. unenforceable.
C. void.
D. valid if recorded.
The answer is C, the forged deed is void.
A forged deed is a deed that is not signed by the owner, instead, someone else claiming himself as the real owner, signs the deed without the approval of the true owner to defraud him.
If the deed comes out to be forged or induced by coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation, or duress the deed is said to be void. In such a case, since the deed is improperly delivered, there is no valid acceptance of the deed.
And since, one of the essentials of a valid contract is a valid acceptance, and in the present case there is no valid acceptance, hence the deed is void.
To know more about forged deeds: https://brainly.com/question/28145903
Could the powders matching be enough to convict? Why or Why not?
If Anton is charged with a crime and sued in a civil action, how would the civil case
differ from the criminal trial? Please explain.
Answer:NO
Explanation:
The correct answer is NO.
If Anton is charged with a crime and is sued in a civil action, the civil and criminal cases would NOT be tried together because civil law doesn't involve criminal matters and procedures in civil and criminal trials are very different.
There are lawsuits for different cases, if Anton is charged with a crime and is sued in a civil action, the civil and criminal cases would NOT be tried together.
What is civil action?
The civil action is a lawsuit for noncriminal actions that started with a complaint. this lawsuit usually involves private parties.
Since Anton's case is a criminal case, the case not be tried in a civil action because they don't involve criminal matters. Also, procedures in civil and criminal trials are different.
Therefore, If Anton is charged with a crime and is sued in a civil action, the civil and criminal cases would NOT be tried together.
Learn more on civil action here,
brainly.com/question/499624
The Supreme Court is responsible for settling tied votes passed in the Senate.
True
False
Answer:
true because it's their work
Answer:
true
Explanation:
.How can I get
campaign funds?
Search all campaign finance data
Research federal election data and its relevance across the country.
Help for candidates and committees
Help for individuals and groups who are active in federal elections.
Research legal resources
Explore relevant statutes, regulations, Commission actions and court cases.
12. Which of the following is something the government cannot control during a peaceful assembly?
a. when they occur
b. where they take place
c. This is not the answer
d. what might be said
Out of the given options, d. what might be said is something the government cannot control during a peaceful assembly
A gathering of individuals known as an assembly typically occurs for a specific purpose, as before the meeting, the preacher delivered a sermon. When a group of individuals has collected together, the word "assembly" is used to describe them. Typically, there is a purpose for the gathering, such as a social, political, or religious one. The freedom of expression and peaceful assembly are guaranteed under First Amendment of the US Constitution.
This implies that as long as it does not inspire violence or other criminal conduct, the government cannot censor what individuals say or express during a peaceful gathering. To maintain public safety and avoid disturbance, the government can manage the timing, location, and method of peaceful meetings, but it cannot control the ideas or message being sent by the participants.
Read more about assembly on:
https://brainly.com/question/1285060
#SPJ1
Resolution definition in your own words
Answer:
The smallest measurement on a measuring tool e.g 1mm on a ruler. The smaller the resolution the more precise the measurement becomes.
( very sorry if you dident want the science answer)
how many years in jail for drunk driving and killing someone?
Answer:
10 years jail time
Which are the deadliest types of intersections
Answer:
Knights Road in Washington DC Streets Road in Bensalem, Pennsylvania These are a couple Hope you have a great blessed day and bless yourself with joy love yall ❤❤❤❤
What time of year do crashes involving deer usually
happen?
July to September
April to June
January to March
October to December
Answer: Option 2
Explanation: April to June is when most deers are born so mothers are wandering around with their bambi's for food and foraging.
Note: this is my personal experience in the state I live. (Pennsylvania) It may vary depending on where you live.
Should U.S. courts, and in particular the United States Supreme Court look to the laws of other nations for guidance when deciding important issues, including those involving rights granted by the Constitution? If so, what impact might this have on their decisions? Please explain.
The Supreme Court's ability to invalidate unconstitutional laws might be construed as undemocratic because judges, who are appointed to their position and are not accountable to the electorate, are given the power to interpret the Constitution and make final decisions.
i hope this helps you a bit!
Answer:
4. The Supreme Court's ability to invalidate unconsti-tutional laws might be construed as undemocratic because judges, who are appointed to their posi¬tion and are not accountable to the electorate, are given the power to interpret the Constitution and make final decisions.
Explanation:
Students in Ms. Webster's science class are doing an experiment that requires 250 milliliters of distilled water for every 5 milliliters of ammonia. The table shows the amount of distilled water needed for various amounts of ammonia. How much distilled water is needed for 1 milliliter of ammonia?
Answer:
50 milliliters
Explanation:
So, if 5 milliliters of ammonia equal 250 milliliters of water and you're seeing how many milliliters of water you will need if you only have 1 milliliter of ammonia, then you only need 50 milliliters of water because you're dividing the amounts into 5 pieces.
The us constitution prohibits the enactment of ___laws which makes acts committed before the laws in question were passed punishable as crimes
The US constitution prohibits the enactment of Ex post facto law.
An ex post facto law is a statute that alters the legal ramifications of deeds that were done or connections that were made before the legislation was passed.Ex post facto laws are ones that apply retroactively and penalize behavior in ways that were not previously possible. Such a legislation hurts the person it affects and relates to things that happened before it was passed.Legislatively adopted new laws typically only have an impact on behavior in the future. The term "retroactive laws" refers to situations in which legislation has an impact on matters that are now before the courts or actions that took place before the law was passed.Thus this is the meaning of Ex post facto law.
Refer here to learn more about Ex post facto law: https://brainly.com/question/2498364
#SPJ1
How to money easily?
Answer:
Go To Collage Get A Good Job.
Explanation:
3. What powers does the U.S. Supreme Court have? Explain
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States and is the final interpreter of federal law, including the U.S. Constitution. The powers of the Supreme Court include:
The powers does the U.S. Supreme CourtJudicial Review: The Supreme Court has the power to review and declare unconstitutional any federal or state law, executive action, or other government action that violates the Constitution.Interpretation of the Constitution: The Supreme Court is responsible for interpreting the Constitution and ensuring that all federal and state laws comply with it.Final Appellate Jurisdiction: The Supreme Court is the final appellate court in the U.S. judicial system and has the power to hear appeals from lower federal and state courts.Discretionary Jurisdiction: The Supreme Court has discretionary jurisdiction, which means it has the power to choose which cases it will hear.Writ of Certiorari: The Supreme Court can issue a writ of certiorari, which is a formal request to lower courts to send up a case for review.Contempt Power: The Supreme Court has the power to hold individuals in contempt of court for disobeying its orders or for disrupting court proceedings.Overall, the Supreme Court plays a critical role in ensuring the rule of law in the United States and has a significant impact on the interpretation and enforcement of federal law and the Constitution.
Learn more about U.S. Supreme Court at https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ1
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest federal court of the United States. Established pursuant to Article III of the U.S. Constitution in 1789, it has ultimate (and largely discretionary) appellate jurisdiction over all federal courts and over state court cases involving issues of federal law, plus original jurisdiction over a small range of cases.
Powers of U.S. Supreme Court:
1. Judicial Review's power : it can devlate any law unconstitutional. The power to say whether any federal state or local law or government action goes against the constitution. Any law that goes against the constitution be nullified or cancelled by the Supreme Court. This allows Supreme Court to check the other branches of government.
2. Power of Interpreting laws : Congress often uses very general language when it writes laws. It's up to the Supreme Court to determine what the laws mean in specific situation. The original jurisdiction covers not only federal cases but also cases relating to naval forces, Ambassadors, etc.
To learn more about U.S. Supreme court : https://brainly.com/question/29789107
Compare the Bill of Rights from our last unit with the International Human rights Law from
this unit, pick two rights that are in one but not the other and explain why you think this
happened.
When comparing the Bill of Rights, which refers to the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, with International Human Rights Law, represented primarily by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), there are indeed rights that are present in one but not the other. Two such examples are:
The Right to Keep and Bear Arms (in the Bill of Rights, specifically the Second Amendment): This right is not explicitly present in International Human Rights Law, as articulated in the UDHR. The reason for this omission can be attributed to the different historical, cultural, and legal contexts of the United States compared to the international community. The right to bear arms holds significant historical and constitutional significance in the United States due to its association with self-defense, the protection of individual liberties, and the historical context of the American Revolution.The Right to Asylum (in International Human Rights Law, specifically Article 14 of the UDHR): This right is not explicitly mentioned in the Bill of Rights. The absence of this right in the Bill of Rights can be attributed to the fact that the United States Constitution primarily focuses on the relationship between the government and its citizens, whereas the right to asylum relates to the treatment of individuals seeking refuge in a country due to fear of persecution in their home country. Asylum is a concept more closely associated with international law and human rights frameworks, addressing the rights and protections of individuals across borders.These differences highlight how legal documents and frameworks can reflect the unique historical, cultural, and legal contexts of a particular country, shaping the specific rights enshrined within them.For more such questions on Amendments
https://brainly.com/question/458137
#SPJ8
On May 11, 2012, Anna purchased a hamburger from the drive-through window at Joe’s Burgers. Back at her office, she got violently sick after eating the burger. She hadn’t had anything else to eat that day, and realized that the burger caused the food poisoning. Anna decided to file a case against the owner of the burger joint (Joe) and demand damages.
Answer:
What is the question? I can help answer it I just need the question
PLEASE HELPPPPPPPP ;) CORRECT WILL GET A BRAINLIST
how the CARES Act is supposed to support the economy.
Answer:
The CARES Act provided $10 billion to fund cash grants for small businesses and nonprofits. The Coronavirus Relief Bill provides an additional $20 billion in grants for those in especially disadvantaged areas. Eligible businesses can receive up to $10,000 in financial aid to cover immediate operating costs.
In this exercise you play the role of a police officer for one day. Long Beach Police officers get up to 30 calls to action in a single 12 -hour shift. As we have discussed, police are first-responders and often find themselves in situations that they do not have the full story of when they arrive. This assignment will have you write out what you think the best-case and worst-case outcomes for four typical calls. Remember, your job is to protect and serve the public and arrive home safely to your family at the end of your shift. In each of these scenarios:
A. Imagine and write about the thoughts that would be going through your mind as you travel to the location
B. Imagine and write about the thoughts that would be going through your mid as you survey the situation
C. Imagine and write about the thoughts that would be going through your mind as you begin your response and describe what that response would be
D. Describe a best-case scenario for how this all might work out
E. Describe a worst-case scenario for how this all might work out
Scenario 1: You are working the night shift and get a call saying that there is a group of 6-10 males congregating in the ally. The caller feared that there were drug deals going on. It is nearly 3:00 in the morning when you approach.
Scenario 2: You are waiting at a red light and the minivan next you all of a sudden crosses the intersection before the light turns green. You turn on your lights and use the intercom to tell the van to pull over. You make out that there are at least 5 people in the van, all adults. You run the plate and dispatch tells you that the owner of the vehicle has a warrant out for his arrest.
Scenario 3: About 30 minutes after the local high school lets out you get a call stating that there are some individuals fighting in the street several blocks down the road from the school. You approach and see several males fighting in the street. You also see dozens of students filming the fight on their cell phones.
Scenario 4: Just before your shift ends, you receive a call that there is a pedestrian on the corner who is yelling, threating, cussing at and harassing any and all people who try to walk down the sidewalk. You arrive at the scene and the person looks unclean and unkept, has a brown paper bag in his hand and that person immediately begins to cuss at you.
Research on the effects of BWCs on officer and civilian actions has been synthesized in this Campbell systematic review.
What is the purpose of assignment statement ?A variable, field, variable, or element's current value is set with an assignment statement. The assignment operator, an expression, and an assignment target are all included in the statement. The expression is assessed when the phrase is run, and the outcome is then saved in the target. During the course of a programme, a variable may hold a variety of values thanks to assignment statements. An assignment statement can also be understood as storing a value in the memory address indicated by a variable name. In a program, an assign statement is used to assign a value to a variable by name.
To know more about assignment statement visit:
brainly.com/question/25875756
#SPJ1
Which best describes how the information lobbyists provide to lawmakers is significant? Lobbyists are allowed to provide false information to undermine opponents. Lobbyists have access to information that may not be available to others, even politicians. Lobbyists offer precise information on voter positions, which politicians can use in elections. Lobbyists can present information in a way that supports their clients’ positions.
The best option that supports how the information that Lobbyists provides is that lobbyists can present information in a way that supports their clients’ positions.
The lobbyist can be described as a person that does the job of convincing legislatures and politicians on voting in a particular way.
Lobbyists are able to represent the views of people. They take the views to the legislators for consideration.
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/10791090?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
D
Explanation:
meow
What is the impact of incorporation?
a The Supreme Court has included local court judges to help rule on certain cases..
b The Supreme Court has applied certain rights from the Bill of Rights to the state governments.
c The Supreme Court has requested that appeals lawyers combine similar cases into one review.
d The Supreme Court has determined that its rulings will only apply to the state in which the case began.
Here we go:
If a parent is cutting their child's hair as a punishment, but while doing so, cut the child's head open with the pair of scissors they were using to cut the hair. The child gets taken to an ER, gets staples in their head, and when the parent is questioned about how it happened, the parent lies about the situation.
Is this an act of child abuse?