After completion of a Driver Improvement Program or after restoration of a motorists driving privilege, he/she will be in a probationary period for how many years 3
1
2
4

Lew has been liable to reimburse the amount to the holder due in course, it related parties and the actual holders of the check.

Option D is correct.

A drawer is referring to person who has created a check in the name of another person or any financial institution like banks.

According to the situation, the drawer of the stolen check is found to be Lew due to forged name put up by Kira. This shows that Lew is now become obligated towards all the parties in connection with the payment of amount being stated in the check.

Therefore, the ordinary holders, Holder due in course and its related parties are beneficial to be get reimbursed by Lew.

Learn more about the bank checks in the related link:

https://brainly.com/question/9892102

#SPJ2

A correctional facility is a municipal or regional facility that houses pretrial individuals believed to present a risk of danger or flight, those awaiting probation or parole revocation, and those sentenced to less than one year incarceration.

A correctional facility is a place where criminals are kept and punished. Correctional facilities are used as a place of detention for inmates in the legal process. This refers to pre-trial inmates or inmates awaiting sentencing. The goal of the prison is to separate the offenders from the rest of society and rehabilitate them so they can reintegrate and be functional members of society.

Correctional facilities are often operated by the government, with the state or federal government responsible for the majority of them. Private correctional facilities, on the other hand, are managed by for-profit firms that may house inmates for governments. Despite being owned by private corporations, private prisons are still subject to government regulation and must adhere to the same laws as public prisons.

To know more about Correctional facility visit-

brainly.com/question/14666606

#SPJ11

During a criminal investigation, police might confiscate an object they believe could be used as evidence to support their case.

This object could be anything that is related to the crime that is being investigated. For example, if someone is suspected of stealing a car, the police might confiscate the car in question. This would allow them to gather evidence such as fingerprints, DNA, and other forensic evidence that might be used to identify the perpetrator of the crime.

Similarly, if the police believe that a suspect has illegal drugs, they might confiscate the drugs as evidence. Ultimately, the goal of confiscating an object is to build a stronger case against the suspect and bring them to justice.

For more about investigation:

https://brainly.com/question/29365121

#SPJ11

A corporation is a separate legal entity that can conduct business, sue or be sued, enter into contracts, own property, and issue stock.

A corporation is a distinct legal entity that is separate from its owners, known as shareholders. As a separate entity, it can own property, enter into contracts, and conduct business. It can also be sued or sued by others in court. Additionally, a corporation can issue stock to raise capital, and the ownership of the corporation can be transferred through the buying and selling of stock. The legal separation of a corporation from its shareholders means that the corporation can shield its shareholders from personal liability for the debts and obligations of the business.
A corporation can "operate independently." A corporation, as a separate legal entity, can own property, enter into contracts, sue and be sued, and conduct business under its own name, independent of its shareholders or owners.

Learn more about corporation: https://brainly.com/question/31313496

#SPJ11

a. The Townshend Act was not one of the components of the Intolerable Acts. The other four components wereThe Townshend Act was not part of the Intolerable Acts, which consisted of the Boston Port Act, the Massachusetts Government Act, the Administration of Justice Act, and the Quartering Act.

The British Parliament issued a slew of harsh laws known as the Intolerable Acts, commonly referred to as the Coercive Acts, in retaliation for the Boston Tea Party in 1773. These Acts did not include the Townshend Act. The Boston Port Act forbade the port from opening until the colonists had compensated for the lost tea. The Massachusetts Government Act strengthened the authority of the British-appointed governor and decreased the authority of the colonial government. British officials who were charged with crimes in the colonies may now be prosecuted in London according to the Administration of Justice Act. According to the Quartering Act, colonists were obligated to house and supply British soldiers. The relationship between Great Britain and the American colonies was further strained by these Acts, which finally resulted in the American Revolution.

learn more about Intolerable Act here:

https://brainly.com/question/6111471

#SPJ4

Answer:

A. True.

Explanation:

The accession of Josiah as the king of Judah when he was just eight years old after the death of his father King Amon. He did what was good in the eyes of the Lord and reigned in Jerusalem for more than thirty years.

In the book of II Kings chapter 22, King Josiah ordered the repairs and work on the Lord's temple. There, the high priest Hilkiah found the Book of the law which was read out to the young king. The news made him so angry and discouraged that he tore off his robes and asked the priests to make the people atone for their sins. The discovery of the Book of the Law led him to lead the whole nation of Judah to repent and ask for forgiveness. At this, God’s anger subsided and He did not go along with His plan of inflicting them with suffering. His action also led to the renewal and reformation of the whole kingdom.

5 candies can Hannah get in exchange for 55 tickets. Typically, there are three balls in each pinball game, which correspond to your three turns.

An itinerary for a round-trip flight from and back to the place of origin constitutes a dummy air ticket. Unlike a paid return ticket, a dummy ticket is not valid. It isn't a confirmed ticket; rather, it's just a document with the travel itinerary information.

Given

Total Prize tickets = 140

Tickets spend on the bracelet = 85

Tickets for candies that cost 10 each

Required to calculate how much candies get =?

Candies = 140 - 85 =55

Candies = 55 / 10 = 5 full candies Hannah gets.

Thus, Hannah gets 5 candies in exchange for 55 tickets. This cost, which is frequently referred to as "Face Value," is fully retained by the event organizer. Standard tickets make up the vast majority of Ticketmaster's sales.

Learn more about Ticket here:

https://brainly.com/question/14001767

#SPJ2

Answer:

b which is concurrent jurisdiction

The condition in which a person should have a guests ID rechecked is:

This refers to the procedures which are put in place to ensure that an underaged person does not purchase or consume alcohol.

With this in mind, if a guest submits an Identification Card to show that he is eligible for buying a drink at a bar(for instance), then it is the responsibility of the bartender or whoever is in charge to double check the ID if the person appears to be underage.

Read more about alcohol use here:
https://brainly.com/question/17449396

Answer:

King Jul ian lll

Mort who am I talking too?

Explanation:

Answer: You are Mental Sico

Explanation:

Answer:

No, I don't perceive Mr. S to be a reliable source. It is because the way he describes that how he discovered the Hae's body is enough to raise thr brows of viewers and listeners.

Explanation:

In Episode 3 of Serial, Mr. S is called by detectives to investigate his side of the story and how he came to find Hae's body which was found completely camouflaged in the dirt.

Mr. S can not be considered a reliabel source by the way he describes the event of his founding Hae's body in the forest, 127 miles away from the main road. Mr. S gives description to the detectives that he got off his car to pee and had a bottle of beer in his hand. It is interesting to note and enough to raise brows of listeners and viewers of the episode that how was he able to see Hae's body which was covered with dirt and was behind a heavy fallen log, which made impossible for someone to see the body easily (especially if someone is drunk).

So, because of this reasoning, one can not considered Mr. S to be a reliabel source.

Answer:

d

Explanation:

Answer:

B

Explanation:

science is based on proven philosophies while philosophies ain't proven

Trace should file his lawsuit in Iowa federal court because of federal question jurisdiction. The federal Civil Rights Act is a federal law, and therefore, the case involves a federal question.

Federal question jurisdiction allows federal courts to hear cases involving questions of federal law. Since Trace's lawsuit is based on alleged violations of his civil rights under the federal Civil Rights Act, the case falls under federal question jurisdiction and should be filed in a federal court.

Additionally, the case should be filed in Iowa federal court because the alleged violations occurred in Iowa and the defendant, the Iowa State Bureau of Investigation, is located in Iowa.

For more similar questions on jurisdiction:

brainly.com/question/16004206

#SPJ11

Answer:

false is the correct answer..

Through the following theories, an employee-plaintiff can prove discrimination under title vii of the civil rights act of 1964

Generally, In the context of employment and housing law in the United States, the term "disparate effect" refers to actions that negatively affect one group of persons with a protected feature more than another, despite the fact that the laws implemented by employers or landlords are legally neutral.

An example of a disproportionate effect would be the employment of more males than women in the construction industry due to physical height or strength requirements (unintentional discrimination).

Read more about employee-plaintiff

https://brainly.com/question/28547296

#SPJ1

In a strict liability case, whether a defendant was at fault is irrelevant. However, the plaintiff must show that the defendant's risky or inherently risky behavior caused the plaintiff to suffer damages or injuries.

A legal doctrine known as "strict liability" holds a party accountable for their deeds or products without requiring the plaintiff to establish negligence or fault. Someone who engages in extremely risky activities, such as maintaining wild animals, using explosives, or producing substandard goods, may be held accountable if another person is hurt.

Strict liability crimes are distinct in that they would still hold the defendant accountable even if the defendant took the necessary precautions and followed safety regulations. The defendant should be able to anticipate that a person could be hurt by the activity given its nature.

Learn more about strict liability with the help of the given link:

brainly.com/question/2669139

#SPJ10

The fines for a first time DUI arrest can vary depending on the state, but they are typically in the range of $1,000 to $10,000. In some states, there are also mandatory jail sentences for first time DUI arrests. So, The  correct answer is D. more than $10,000.

For a first DUI offense, there are additional consequences in addition to fines and jail time. These may consist of:

License revocation: For a set amount of time, usually between 90 days and a year, your driver's license will be suspended.

You might be compelled to have an ignition interlock device installed in your vehicle. With the help of this equipment, you cannot start your car after drin-king.

attending a DUI course You could have to go to DUI school. You will learn about the risks of dru-nk driving in this session, as well as how to prevent it. It's crucial to refrain from drink-ing and driving because the consequences of a first-time DUI arrest can be severe. If you are detained due to a DUI, it is important to speak to an attorney to discuss your options.

To know more about DUI :

https://brainly.com/question/32308136

#SPJ2

Answer:

Environmental protection is the opportunity that appeals to me in the community. The climate change can be considered the main challenge of human beings on earth. Climate change has caused various tragedies from forest fires to catastrophic storms across the USA.

Explanation:

The you people can make a difference in the society.

Community involvement and volunteering are helping to attract and retain employees in a whole new way. In a recent survey, 55% of respondents said that a company’s support for social causes was an important factor in accepting a job offer.

There are several opportunities for involvement in a community that can impact and promote the quality of life of residents, such as promoting sustainability and environmental protection.

You can contribute to sustainability in your community through your personal habits, sharing information and creating events and lectures to raise awareness.

Some simple attitudes and changes in daily habits are already capable of promoting environmental responsibility, such as:

Therefore, every individual can help in the development of their community, seek information on what their community's greatest needs are and find out how you are able to help.

Learn more here:

https://brainly.com/question/1051849

The significance of the Jon Benet Ramsey case with the impact on law enforcement protocol is that it helped to establish the protocol that would be used in securing a crime scene so as not to have it contaminated by other people.

This was the homicide case of the lady named JonBennet that had been killed in what the law enforcement agents ruled as homicide. The cause of death that she had was from the fact that she was strangled and suffered from asphyxiation due to the act.

The issue that resulted was that her father contaminated the scene of the crime when he went to get hold of the victims body thereby making it difficult to get the suspect that committed the murder.

The major lesson that was learnt from this was the need to always secure the crime scene first and block people from having the entrance to such areas.

Read more on law enforcement protocol here: https://brainly.com/question/21082629

#SPJ1

Answer:

Prohibited means banned/forbidden. Think of the question as, "What does the 4th amendment protect you from?"

Answer:

According to the FBI database, there are an average of 64 police officers dying per year.

The doctrine of forum non conveniens is a legal principle that allows a court to dismiss a case if it is not the most convenient forum for the parties involved.

This principle is based on the idea that courts should adjudicate cases where it will be most fair and efficient for all parties involved. If a court finds that another forum would be more convenient for the parties, it may dismiss the case and allow the parties to litigate in that other forum.

The doctrine of forum non conveniens is a legal principle that allows a court to dismiss a case if it is not the most convenient forum for the parties involved. This principle is based on the idea that courts should adjudicate cases where it will be most fair and efficient for all parties involved. If a court finds that another forum would be more convenient for the parties, it may dismiss the case and allow the parties to litigate in that other forum.

Learn more about courts at : https://brainly.com/question/13375489

#SPJ4

The concepts of social justice embraced by Ubuntu include equity (encourages interdependence), fairness, and equality (promotes equal opportunities) (brings about equal sharing of resources such that all members survive).

In Bantu, the word "Ubuntu" means "humanity" and is an African word. The full concept of "humanity for others" is expressed in this sentence. If a person has endured physical, mental, or emotional injury, they are regarded as a victim.

When a victim reports an incident, police take the proper action by acquiring all necessary data. Nonetheless, Ubuntu's guiding principles place more of an emphasis on what is ethically right than what is right. The general population ought to have more empathy for the victims and treat them with dignity.

Occasionally, a victim will kill a perpetrator. It is not appropriate for the investigating authorities to assume the victim was also the attacker in this situation. Investigating the scene of the crime and obtaining the murderer's testimony should be the police' top priorities. Prior to the investigation's conclusion, they shouldn't regard the person as either a victim or a criminal.

Compared to other philosophies, Ubuntu's approach to problem solving is slightly different. We should always have a big picture in Ubuntu. For instance, when a person travels, they might not always have a place to stay. The villagers may occasionally provide the things that the travelers need. The fact that the villagers give the travelers supplies is unimportant, but they nevertheless do it. This is due to their increased humanity and the assistance they give to others.

When a person poses a threat to large individuals, poisoning the subject is necessary. According to Ubuntu's guiding principles, a victim should be handled with compassion and ethics.

Learn more about Ubuntu's guiding principles: https://brainly.com/question/17259369

#SPJ9

Answer:

episodes of sleeping that last more than 30 seconds

Answer:

1. Katarungang Pambarangay is an innovation of the Philippine justice system. It provides for resolution of disputes at the barangay level in order to achieve peace and harmony within the community and to provide an accessible and effective form of justice for community members.

2.Katarungang Barangay (KP) is a system of justice administered at the barangay level for the purpose of amicable settling disputes through mediation, conciliation or abitration among the family or barangay without resorting to the courts.

Answer:

Not sure, but this helps! :)

Explanation:

The law that applies to situations where state and federal laws disagree is called the supremacy clause, which is part of article VI of the Constitution [source: FindLaw]. Basically, if a federal and state law contradicts, then when you're in the state you can follow the state law, but the fed can decide to stop you.