According to the textbook definition, which of the following defenses to a claim of negligence was a complete bar to recovery under the common law?
- Comparative negligence
- Contributory negligence
- Intervening cause
- Assumption of risk

A right against forced self-incrimination.

your choice

Explanation:

Law school take 3 year

it's intense and comptive

have to read really long books

But it easier to get into than medical school

Answer:

Law school is not a bad idea for every student

Explanation:

but it certainly can be a bad idea for some students. If you have unreasonable expectations of what a lawyer's work entails, how much money you will make, or if you have the wrong reasons for wanting to attend, than law school can be a bad idea.

Brainlest

good luck! :D

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Because you cant expect a baby to talk to you face-to-face, and they won't do c or d either.

The president of the United States does not have to be good in math. This is because they have an army of the best mathematicians and the most advanced technology at their hands. One might need to be good at basic math and calculations, but not proficient in subjects such as calculus or trigonometry.

I hope this helps! :)

The statement "superposition cannot be used to solve for circuit values using ohm 's law in circuits having more than one connected voltage source." is false as superposition can be used to solve for circuit values using Ohm's law.

Even in circuits with multiple connected voltage sources, the circuit values can be determined using the superposition method and Ohm's law. By using the superposition principle, which is used in circuit analysis, we can examine the effects of each voltage or current source separately while treating the others as inactive or off.

We can calculate the resulting values using Ohm's law or other pertinent circuit laws and equations to determine the contribution of each source to the overall circuit behavior. This method simplifies the analysis by dividing it into separate calculations making it especially helpful in complex circuits with multiple sources.

Learn more about Ohm's law at:

brainly.com/question/1247379

#SPJ4

The complete question is "superposition cannot be used to solve for circuit values using ohm 's law in circuits having more than one connected voltage source. true or false"

Any court can impose its authority over an individual or organization if it can establish jurisdiction.

Hence, the correct option is a.

Jurisdiction refers to the power or authority of a court to hear and make decisions in a legal case.

If a court has jurisdiction over a person or organization, it has the authority to impose its decisions and rulings over them. Without jurisdiction, a court does not have the power to make decisions that are binding on the parties involved in a case.

Sovereignty refers to the supreme authority of a state over its territory and people and is not directly related to the power of a court.

Liability refers to legal responsibility for one's actions or conduct.

Jurisprudence refers to the theory and philosophy of law, which is not directly related to the court's authority to impose its decisions.

To know more about jurisdiction here:

https://brainly.com/question/12448353

#SPJ4

Answer:

There are 535 members.

Explanation:

Five delegates and one resident commissioner serve as non-voting members of the House, although they can vote in committee.

Answer:

435

Explanation:

commissioner serve as non-voting members of the House

Student loan different from a scholarship because: A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back.

Student loan can be defined as borrowing or lending money to cover your school expenses  while  scholarship is a financial aid or financial assistance to cover your school expenses.

When you borrowed money you are expected to payback but when it comes to scholarship you are not expected to pay back because the money given to you was free.

Inconclusion Student loan different from a scholarship because: A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back.

Learn more about Student Loan and scholarship here:https://brainly.com/question/488893

A federal appeals court recently halted a proposal by president Biden relating to student loan forgiveness plan of debt.

Thus the answer is student loan forgiveness plan.

Refer here to learn more about federal appeals court: https://brainly.com/question/24978344

#SPJ4

Answer:

just need points sorry

Explanation:

The European and Liberian societies greatly benefited from the transatlantic trade in various ways. Europeans experienced economic growth due to increased access to resources, labor, and new markets. The transatlantic trade provided them with raw materials such as sugar, cotton, and tobacco, which were essential for their growing industries. Additionally, European countries expanded their colonial empires, gaining control over territories and populations, which increased their global influence.

The slave trade was another aspect of the transatlantic trade that immensely benefited European countries, as it supplied them with a cheap and abundant labor force. Liberians, on the other hand, benefited from the transatlantic trade through the introduction of new crops, technologies, and cultural exchanges. Europeans brought crops like cassava, maize, and plantains, which became staples in the Liberian diet. The new technologies introduced by Europeans, such as metallurgy and textile production, significantly improved local industries. The cultural exchanges resulting from the transatlantic trade led to the blending of African and European traditions, creating unique art, music, and languages.  Both European and Liberian societies experienced significant benefits from the transatlantic trade, such as economic growth, access to new resources and markets, improved industries, and rich cultural exchanges.

to know about transatlantic trade visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14260809

#SPJ11

A theory that focuses on contradictory interests, inequalities between social groups, and the resulting conflict and change is called Conflict Theory.

Conflict theory is a social theory that emphasizes the role of conflict, competition, and inequality in society. It posits that social groups and individuals within society have conflicting interests and that these conflicts can lead to social change.

At the heart of conflict theory is the idea that society is composed of different social groups that have unequal access to resources, power, and opportunities.

These social groups may include classes, races, genders, or other categories of people who are defined by their social position and experience different levels of privilege or disadvantage.

Conflict theory suggests that these social groups are in a constant state of conflict over the distribution of resources and power. Those with more power and resources may seek to maintain their advantages, while those with less power may struggle to gain access to these resources and improve their position in society.

This struggle can manifest in various ways, such as through political conflict, economic competition, or even physical violence.

Conflict theory also posits that social change occurs as a result of these conflicts. When social groups are unable to resolve their conflicts through negotiation or compromise, they may resort to more extreme measures, such as revolution or social movements.

These actions can lead to changes in the distribution of power and resources within society, as well as changes in the social institutions and structures that govern society.

To learn more about conflict theory, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/30141652

#SPJ11

Answer:

Duties to protect people in their cities, and to stop criminals from committing crimes; Such duties are;

Supporters of three strikes laws emphasize their deterrent effect, enhanced public safety, and closure for victims. Critics argue that these laws are excessively punitive, contribute to mass incarceration, and overlook the importance of rehabilitation.

Three strikes laws, implemented in some jurisdictions, impose harsh penalties on individuals who commit a third felony offense. Advocates argue that these laws are effective deterrents and ensure public safety by incapacitating repeat offenders. They contend that such laws send a strong message, holding individuals accountable for their actions and preventing recidivism. Moreover, proponents assert that three strikes laws provide closure to victims and their families.

However, opponents argue that three strikes laws are overly punitive and disproportionately affect marginalized communities. They claim that these laws contribute to mass incarceration and strain the criminal justice system. Critics contend that mandatory sentencing removes judicial discretion, leading to unfair outcomes. Additionally, opponents assert that focusing on rehabilitation and addressing the root causes of criminal behavior would be more effective in reducing crime.

To know more about mass incarceration refer here

brainly.com/question/32346356

#SPJ11

True. In the end, the endorsed a revision to the constitution that altered how its members were chosen. 1913 saw the ratification of the amendment.

The Fourteenth Amendment, which was approved by the Senate on June 8, 1866, and ratified two years later, on July 9, 1868, extended the provisions by granting citizenship to all individuals "born or naturalized in the United States," including people who had previously been held as slaves, and guaranteed "equal protection under the laws" to all citizens.

The United States' Constitution was amended with the Twenty-seventh Amendment in 1992, which mandated that any changes to the pay scales for members of Congress may only take effect after the next House of Representatives election.

Learn more about constitutional Visit: brainly.com/question/20336789#

#SPJ4

Vice presidents are not permitted to cast a vote in the Senate, with the exception of breaking a tie, or to address the Senate informally without the consent of the senators.

Why can't the Vice President take part in Senate Debate?

The only constitutional obligation for a vice president is to preside over the Senate, except from taking over as president in the event of a president's demise or resignation. Vice presidents are not permitted to cast a vote in the Senate, with the exception of breaking a tie, or to address the Senate informally without the consent of the senators.

According to the Constitution, the vice president of the United States leads the Senate. The vice president officially preside over the receipt and tabulation of electoral votes cast in presidential elections in addition to acting as the meeting's presiding officer. He or she also has the only authority to break a deadlock in the Senate.

A vice president in the government is someone whose main duty is to take the president's position in the case of the latter's demise, resignation, or incapacity.

Learn more about Vice President :

https://brainly.com/question/18882530

#SPJ1

One way to find out if there is a warrant for your arrest is to contact the local law enforcement agency, such as the police department or sheriff's office.

You can either go in person to the station or call the non-emergency line to inquire about any active warrants under your name.

You will need to provide your full name and any other relevant personal information, such as your date of birth or social security number, to verify your identity.
Another option is to check the public record databases maintained by the court system.

Many courts have an online search tool that allows you to look up court cases and warrants by name or case number.

You can also visit the courthouse in person and request to see your criminal record or any active warrants.

However, keep in mind that some court records may be sealed or restricted, especially if they involve minors or sensitive information.
There are also private companies that offer background check services that can include a warrant search.

These services typically require a fee and may have varying levels of accuracy and reliability.

You should do your research and read reviews before using any third-party background check service.

Know more about a warrant here:

https://brainly.com/question/29668617

#SPJ11

The chronological order of the events surrounding the creation of the U.S. system of Government is gathering of delegates, publication of federalist papers, ratification and adoption of the bills of rights.

The founders laid down the requirements for ratifying the Constitution. because they thought state lawmakers wouldn't want to give up power to the federal government. They asked that each state conduct a separate ratification convention in its place. In order to establish a powerful central government to deal with the challenges the nation faced, the Federalists sought to convert at least three states.

The Anti-Federalists fought ferociously against the Constitution because it did not establish a charter of rights and strengthened the power of the federal government. Delegates were gathered at the constitutional convention, the federalist papers were published, the constitution was ratified by the states, and the bill of rights was adopted.

To know more about the constitution, refer to the following link:

https://brainly.com/question/453546

#SPJ4

Complete question is:

Place these events surrounding the creation of the U.S. system of government in chronological order

1- delegates gather at the constitutional convention

2-the federalist papers are published

3- the constitution is ratified by the states

4-the bill of rights is adopted

No, the spring would not always follow Hooke's law, no matter how far you stretched it. Hooke's law states that the force required to stretch or compress a spring is directly proportional to the distance it is stretched or compressed.

However, this law only applies within the elastic limit of the spring. Once the spring is stretched beyond its elastic limit, it will no longer follow Hooke's law and may become permanently deformed. Therefore, it is important to consider the elastic limit of a spring when applying Hooke's law.

For more similar questions on hooke's law:

brainly.com/question/30116694

#SPJ11

Answer: ok he did it

Explanation:The reason is because 1+1 is 2 - 1 thats 3 quick maths.

Federal levels offer citizens the chance to challenge a court's decisions.

The Supreme Court asserted its authority to review actions of Congress and the president and declare them unconstitutional in Marbury v. Madison, setting the stage for the American system of judicial review.

Established the right to judicial review, which strengthened the Court's authority and improved its parity with other governmental organs. The Supreme Court can evaluate if a law is unconstitutional and can then invalidate it using judicial review.

To Know more about court's decisions.

https://brainly.com/question/28435940

#SPJ9

Answer: unreliable and inaccurate

Explanation:

The question of limitations on First Amendment rights is a complex and controversial topic. Various legal, ethical, and societal considerations are involved in determining the extent and boundaries of these rights.

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the rights to freedom of speech, religion, and peaceful assembly. These rights are considered fundamental in a democratic society and provide individuals with the freedom to express their thoughts, beliefs, and opinions.

While these rights are generally upheld, there are certain limitations imposed by law. For example, freedom of speech does not protect certain types of speech such as obscenity, incitement to violence, or defamation. Similarly, the freedom of religion does not allow practices that infringe upon the rights of others or violate laws. The right to peacefully assemble is subject to reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions to ensure public safety and order.

The question of whether there should be limitations on these rights is a matter of ongoing debate and interpretation. Some argue that certain limitations are necessary to prevent harm or protect the rights of others, while others emphasize the importance of preserving these rights without undue restrictions.

The balance between freedom of expression and societal interests is a complex and nuanced issue that continues to be discussed and decided upon by courts, lawmakers, and society as a whole.

Know more about  First Amendment rights    here:

https://brainly.com/question/26448398

#SPJ8

1. MLA is a member of the legislative assembly is one who is elected by the public as their representative in the legislative assembly.

2. The two conditions that candidates must fulfill before their names can appear on a ballot are:

a. The candidate must sign petition signatures by the people who did not participate in any election through any political party.

b. He should fill out the application form and sign it after that his/her name will be able to come on the ballot.

3. The candidate must convince all the voters that he is a good leader for them and also fulfill all the necessary needs and demands. he /she should raise up from the caste, gender, religion, etc. as these social aspects may lead to the defeat of the candidate in elections.

4.a. One should be a citizen of the country.

b. One should meet their state's residency requirements.

c. Should be 18 yrs old on or before the day of the election.

d. Should be registered to vote by the state's voter registration deadline.

5. Before the election day the eligible voters receive the final speech by their representative o the candidate standing in elections.

6. The four stages through which people vote on election day are:

1. First of all the voter has to decide who is the correct representative according to their point of view.

2. Now he should have to go to the polling booth.

3. Now he has to select their representative on the ballot machine.

4. Now he has to click on the election symbol of their representative.

read more about MLA at:

https://brainly.com/question/30404365

It can be held as completely unfair and biased to reward the loyalty by giving government appointment to friends, however, the appointments that are in one's hands may be rewarded to the friends and families by the person in power.

Appointment of friends to a position under government employment when the person does not have enough skills and qualifications is completely unfair as a representation of the misuse of power of position.

However, it will be considered as truly and completely fair only when the appointment of the person is done when he or she is friend, but also highly competent for such appointment.

Therefore, the significance regarding government appointments has been aforementioned.

Learn more about government appointment here:

https://brainly.com/question/25669488

#SPJ1

The probability distribution calculated from the given data satisfies both Equation 5.1 (f(x) ≥ 0) and Equation 5.2 (Σ f(x) = 1).

To satisfy Equation 5.1, we need to ensure that all values in the "Disposed" column are non-negative. In this case, all the values provided are greater than or equal to zero, so Equation 5.1 is satisfied.

Next, to satisfy Equation 5.2, we need to calculate the sum of all the values in the "Disposed" column and divide each value by the total sum:

Total Disposed cases: 43945

Probability distribution for the "Disposed" column:

Fred Cartolano: 3037 / 43945 ≈ 0.069

Thomas Crush: 3372 / 43945 ≈ 0.077

Patrick Dinkelacker: 1258 / 43945 ≈ 0.029

Timothy Hogan: 1954 / 43945 ≈ 0.044

Robert Kraft: 3138 / 43945 ≈ 0.071

William Mathews: 2264 / 43945 ≈ 0.052

William Morrissey: 3032 / 43945 ≈ 0.069

Norbert Nadel: 2959 / 43945 ≈ 0.067

Arthur Ney Jr.: 3219 / 43945 ≈ 0.073

Richard Niehaus: 3353 / 43945 ≈ 0.076

Thomas Nurre: 3000 / 43945 ≈ 0.068

John O'Connor: 2969 / 43945 ≈ 0.068

Robert Ruehlman: 3205 / 43945 ≈ 0.073

Ann Marie Tracey: 3141 / 43945 ≈ 0.071

Ralph Winkler: 3089 / 43945 ≈ 0.070

Now, if we sum up all these probabilities, we get:

\(0.069 + 0.077 + 0.029 + 0.044 + 0.071 + 0.052 + 0.069 + 0.067 + 0.073 + 0.076 + 0.068 + 0.068 + 0.073 + 0.071 + 0.070 ≈ 1\)

The sum of the probabilities is approximately 1, which satisfies Equation 5.2.

Therefore, the probability distribution calculated from the given data satisfies both Equation 5.1 (f(x) ≥ 0) and Equation 5.2 (Σ f(x) = 1).

To know more about Probability:

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ4

The given statement "The defendant's answer may state an affirmative defense, such as assumption of the risk." is True because Affirmative defenses allow the defendant to admit that the plaintiff's claims are true, but provide other reasons why the defendant should not be held liable.

Assumption of the risk is an affirmative defense that holds that the plaintiff assumed the risk of harm by voluntarily engaging in an activity that carried an inherent risk of harm.

To successfully use assumption of the risk as an affirmative defense, the defendant must be able to show that the plaintiff was aware of the risk created by their activity, that the plaintiff accepted that risk, and that the plaintiff's injury was caused by the known risk.

To know more about Affirmative defenses, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/28554010

#SPJ4