According to the terms of Carmen's last will and testament , the assets of Carmen's estate that remain are most likely to be distributed through a residuary clause. Option A is correct.
What is last will and testament ?A last will and testament, which is a legal document, expresses a person's last desires with regard to their property. It offers detailed guidelines on how to handle their belongings. If the deceased leaves them to someone else, a group, or desires to donate them to a charity should be done on the basis of last will & testament.
There are generally three types of Wills: a) Partially handwritten and partially typewritten. (b) Holographic—written entirely in the author's own handwriting. (c) Standard, formal typewritten—printed or typed. Each type of Will has distinct conditions for becoming legitimate.
Thus residuary clause of last will for distribution of assets is correct.
Learn more about will refer:
https://brainly.com/question/3245773
#SPJ1
after an arrest at the suspect's house, the suspect's wife filed a complaint charging one of the police officers with taking money that was lying out on a table. what would this be called?
The act of the police officer taking money from the suspect's house, as alleged by the suspect's wife, would typically be referred to as "theft" or "embezzlement."
If the suspect's wife has filed a complaint accusing the police officer of taking money that was lying out on a table during the arrest, this would be considered a criminal offense. The specific charge would depend on the jurisdiction and the elements of the crime, but it could generally be classified as theft or embezzlement.
Theft involves unlawfully taking someone else's property without their consent and with the intent to permanently deprive them of it. Embezzlement, on the other hand, typically refers to the misappropriation or fraudulent conversion of property entrusted to one's care, often in a professional or fiduciary capacity.
If the complaint is substantiated and the evidence supports the allegations, the police officer could face criminal charges, an internal investigation, and potential legal consequences for their actions.
To learn more about embezzlement click here : brainly.com/question/28503275
#SPJ11
Of the following, turnout among young voters is likely to be highest among
black educated females
low-income male college students
young white, non-Hispanic males
non-college factory workers
Answer:
Black educated females
What are the differences between "evaluative" and "facilitative" mediation? Please answer that question within the context of a dispute that has escalated to litigation, but before a trial has started.
Mediation can be used in any dispute, whether it is related to civil or criminal law. The role of a mediator is to help parties resolve their disputes by assisting them in reaching a mutually agreeable solution. Mediation can be evaluative or facilitative. The main differences between evaluative and facilitative mediation in the context of a dispute that has escalated to litigation, but before a trial has started are explained below:
Evaluative Mediation:Evaluative mediation is a form of mediation in which the mediator provides feedback on the merits of each party's case. The mediator in this form of mediation can be a legal expert who provides guidance and advice to the parties based on the law and the facts of the case. This type of mediation is more suited for disputes that have already escalated to litigation, but before a trial has started. Evaluative mediation can be useful for parties who need an assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of their case. The mediator can also suggest potential outcomes if the case goes to trial, which can help the parties decide whether to settle or continue with litigation.
Facilitative Mediation:Facilitative mediation is a form of mediation in which the mediator helps the parties communicate and reach a resolution on their own. The mediator does not provide feedback on the merits of each party's case or offer advice. Instead, the mediator guides the parties through the negotiation process and helps them come up with their own solutions. This type of mediation is more suited for disputes that have not yet escalated to litigation.
Facilitative mediation can be useful for parties who want to maintain control over the outcome of their dispute. The parties are encouraged to reach a mutually agreeable solution, which can help preserve their relationship and avoid further conflict.
Learn more about Mediation
https://brainly.com/question/30783013
#SPJ11
what is the role of the competition appeal court
Answer: Competition
Explanation: Competition Appeal Tribunal a specialist judicial body. Among other things, it is charged with hearing appeals in respect of decisions made under the Competition Act 1998 by the OFFICE OF FAIR TRADING and the regulators in the telecommunications, electricity, gas, water, railways and air traffic services sectors.
Hope this helps!
Chen was here
Answer: The Competition Appeal Court may consider any appeal from, or review of, a decision of the Competition Tribunal; confirm, amend or set aside a decision or an order that is the subject of appeal or review by the Competition Tribunal; and give any judgment or make any order that the circumstances require.
Explanation:
2. Which of the following is an effect of alcohol on driving?
a) Judgment impairment
b) Increased driving efficiency
c) Increased driving awareness
the judge will meet with the parties and counsel in a(n) conference to encourage settlement, address outstanding motions, and review discovery.
The judge will meet with the parties and counsel in a(n) pretrial conference to encourage settlement, address outstanding motions, and review discovery.
Judges provide instructions to juries prior to their deliberations and in the case of bench trials, judges should determine the facts of the case and make a ruling. additionally, judges are also accountable for sentencing convicted crook defendants. maximum cases are heard and settled by a jury.
The definition of a judge is someone who has the authority to hear and determine court docket cases or someone who is assigned the activity of creating an evaluation about something. An instance of judge is Sandra Day O'Connor, a former best court choose. An example of decide is someone who picks the winner in a technology fair.
Someone who is in charge of tribulation in a courtroom and comes to a decision how someone who is responsible of a crime need to be punished, or who makes decisions on criminal topics: a British high-court docket judge
Learn more about judge here:https://brainly.com/question/2533637
#SPJ4
Sometimes, economic goals conflict with one another. Therefore, all nations must their economic goals. And each choice comes with some kind of _____.
Answer:
loss
Explanation:
The economic goals are the objectives of any nation which it desires to achieve. The economic goals of any nations includes full employment, efficiency, security, equity, stability, economic freedom and economic growth.
The economic goal are sometimes incompatible with each other. The cost of fulfilling the one set goals is having less resources to address the other sets of goals.
The economic goals conflict with one another. Every goal cannot be achieve at the same time. The choice of one goal comes with the loss of another goal.
Do defense teams have the ability to mount a defense against evidence? What affects their ability?
Answer:
Here's a sample answer:)
No, defense teams do not have the ability to defend against evidence. Usually, this is because there is not enough money or resources for them to use. This can also be affected by the type and/or amount of evidence presented. If there is undeniable evidence or an overwhelming amount of evidence it is very difficult to defend against such. Typically in this situation,the legal strategy to undermine the prosecution’s case is used.
Pleading the Fifth" refers to what part of the Fifth Amendment?
Known as Miranda rights, these rights include the right to remain silent, the right to have an attorney present during questioning, and the right to have a government-appointed attorney if the suspect cannot afford one.
Pleading the Fifth" refers to what part of the Fifth Amendment?
The Fifth Amendment breaks down into five rights or protections: the right to a jury trial when you are charged with a crime, protection against double jeopardy, safety against self-incrimination, the proper to a fair trial, and safety against the taking of property by means of the authorities besides compensation riminatory.
What are the three parts of the 5th Amendment?
Known as Miranda rights, these rights include the proper to stay silent, the proper to have an lawyer current during questioning, and the right to have a government-appointed lawyer if the suspect can't find the money for one.
Learn more about Miranda rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/2242029
#SPJ1
If the league was ruled a single-entity which of the following would be true?
The league would be subject to antitrust laws
The league would be a oligopoly
The league would be exempt from antitrust laws
None of the above
If the league was ruled a single-entity, the league would be exempt from antitrust laws. A single-entity is a type of ownership in which multiple entities are combined into a single unit. In such a system, one legal entity owns and operates all of the teams, rather than each team being owned by a separate individual or organization. The league would be exempt from antitrust laws if it were ruled as a single-entity.
The reason is that antitrust laws exist to prevent monopolies or oligopolies from forming, which can stifle competition and lead to consumer harm. However, if the league is deemed a single-entity, it would not be considered a monopoly or oligopoly because it is a single unit that owns and operates all of the teams. Therefore, it would be exempt from antitrust laws. So, if the league was ruled a single-entity, the league would be exempt from antitrust laws. Therefore, option - "The league would be exempt from antitrust laws" is correct.
To know more about antitrust laws visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8431756
#SPJ11
if a person already gave consent to a search, can they take it back?
What was the court's majority opinion in Plessy v. Ferguson?
On Plato
Answer:
majority opinion by Henry B. Brown. The Court held that the state law was constitutional. In an opinion authored by Justice Henry Billings Brown, the majority upheld state-imposed racial segregation.
The most frequently used disposition in juvenile courts is ________.
Answer:
Hello.
The most frequently used disposition in juvenile courts are Probation followed by Placement.
Which of the following would disqualify an act from being considered fraud?
A. There was no force or threat of force used in the act.
O B. The individual accused of fraud knew that his statements were
false.
C. No loss was suffered nor intended.
D. The deception took place via mail rather than in person.
Answer:
The deception took place via rather than in person.
Answer:
C. No loss was suffered nor intended
Explanation:
How many types of appeal are there?
Answer:
3
Explanation:
Which of the following events would NOT provide police with probable cause to search a suspect’s home? Select all that apply.
The police have fingerprints that link the suspect to the scene of the crime at the time the crime was committed.
The police have verifiable information from an informant that the suspect has merchandise taken in a robbery behind a bookcase in the living room of his home.
The police know that the suspect has committed robberies in the past.
They heard a rumor that the suspect had committed the crime being investigated.
Answer:
last 2, heard a rumor.... past robberies
Explanation:
in deciding whether a contract was formed, the courts look to the subjective intent of the parties. a. true b. false
The courts consider the subjective intention of the parties when determining whether or not a contract was formed. This statement is False.
whether a contract exists based on a subjective or objective standard?
The objective standard test governs terms and conditions, which asks if a reasonable person observing the interaction would surmise that an acceptance and an offer had occurred.
Which of the four considerations is taken into account by courts in evaluating whether an argument is a term or solely a depiction?
The rule of parol evidence
A court's starting point in deciding whether a written term is a term or a misrepresentation is that it is a term and the only term.
To know more about parol evidence click here brainly.com/question/29679663
#SPJ4
Charlotte (32) is married. However, she and her two children, Francis (3) and Cassandra (5), moved back in with her parents in 2019, after she separated from her husband. She will not be filing a joint return with her husband. They are all U.S. citizens and have social security numbers that are valid for employment. Charlotte's divorce had not been finalized by the end of 2021, but her husband did not live with her during the year. The children stayed with him 150 nights and the rest of the nights with Charlotte. He did not pay any of her household expenses. Since the separation, Charlotte and her children have lived in the finished basement apartment that her parents used to rent to local college students. Charlotte pays more than half the cost of maintaining the apartment, and neither of the children provided any of their own support. Her 2021 wages and AGI were $43,250 which was $4,236 higher than her 2019 earned income. Francis and Cassandra had no income. Charlotte had no other income including foreign income. She will not be releasing any dependent exemptions for which she may qualify.
What is Francis' dependency status for Charlotte?
Note that with regard to dependency status, Francis is Charlotte's dependent child for tax purposes as he lived with her for over half the year and did not provide any of his own support.
What is dependency Status?Dependency status refers to the classification of a person as a dependent for tax purposes.
This classification determines who is responsible for providing support for the individual, and who can claim them as a dependent on their tax return for certain tax benefits.
A dependent can be a qualifying child or a qualifying relative and must meet certain criteria, including living with the taxpayer for over half the year, not providing over half of their own support, and meeting relationship, age, and support tests.
Learn more about dependency status:
https://brainly.com/question/29973022
#SPJ1
Some promises will be enforced as contracts where the offeree relied on a material promise and changed his position to his detriment
true or false
Some promises will be enforced as contracts where the offeree relied on a material promise and cannot change his position to his detriment. Thus, the given statement is false.
What type of contract is a promise?Bilateral contracts are those where each party makes a promise in return for the other's promise, whereas unilateral contracts are those where one party makes a promise and the other executes an act. These verbal or written pledges must be binding under the law.
A contract, however, is enforceable in a court of law. There are no legal ramifications for breaking a promise the same way there are for breaching a contract, however, persons of integrity and high moral character try to uphold pledges wherever feasible.
Learn more about the promise, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13668698
#SPJ1
Why do you think the constitution outlined amendment methods involving congress and state legislatures while excluding the executive branch ? Break down your paragraph in the following: Claim,Data,Explain
Claim: The US Constitution outlines amendment methods involving Congress and state legislatures while excluding the executive branch to ensure a fair and democratic process for making changes to the Constitution.
Data: Article V of the US Constitution outlines the process for amending the Constitution. This process involves proposing amendments by a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. The proposed amendment must then be ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures or by conventions in three-fourths of the states. The executive branch, which includes the President, is not involved in the amendment process.
What is a constitutional amendment?Explain: The exclusion of the executive branch from the amendment process was a deliberate decision by the framers of the Constitution to ensure that the amendment process was fair and democratic. Including the executive branch in the amendment process could give the President too much power and could lead to the abuse of power. By involving Congress and state legislatures, the amendment process is designed to be a collaborative effort among elected officials who represent the interests of the people.
This process ensures that any proposed amendments are thoroughly debated and that the changes to the Constitution reflect the will of the people rather than the desires of any one individual or branch of government. Overall, the exclusion of the executive branch from the amendment process serves as an important safeguard to ensure the integrity and legitimacy of the Constitution.
Read more about constitutional amendment
https://brainly.com/question/699977
#SPJ1
The law that specifically prohibits "questionable" or "dubious" payments to foreign officials to secure business contracts is called the_____
The law that specifically prohibits "questionable" or "dubious" payments to foreign officials to the secure business contracts is as called the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
What do countries use to give up the import of goods from a precise country?Countries use quotas in international exchange to help modify the extent of trade between them and other countries. Countries on occasion impose quotas on unique merchandise to reduce imports and amplify home production. In theory, quotas raise home manufacturing via limiting foreign competition.
What is the definition of trade protectionism?Definition. Trade protectionism is a policy that protects home industries from unfair overseas competition. The four predominant equipment used in alternate protectionism are tariffs, subsidies, quotas, and foreign money manipulation.
To know more about dubious payments visit;-
brainly.com/question/17317070
#SPJ4
Firms who are low-cost leaders _____.
are able to generate more profit because they are generally able to price higher than their rivals.
are able to generate more profit because they are generally unable to price higher than their rivals.
are able to generate more profit because they are generally lower cost producers than their rivals.
do not generally have an advantage over their rivals.
Firms that are low-cost leaders are able to generate more profit because they are generally able to price higher than their rivals. Thus, option A is correct.
It is tempting to develop cost leaders as businesses that offer products and services of poor quality at exorbitant costs. A company that employs a cost leadership strategy provides a wide range of clients with goods and services at competitive prices that are of good quality and quality-richness.
It is also sometimes called a strong value proposition when a price and value are both reasonable. Companies using a cost-leadership strategy aim to generate a profit by combining high sales with a low per-unit profit.
To learn more about cost-leadership
brainly.com/question/13077606
#SPJ4
Please explain in detail how social psychology can play an important role in courts of Pakistan?
Answer:
Your knowledge of yourself and the world around you will be enriched by learning more about social psychology. You will develop a better understanding of how social relationships affect the functioning of individuals by learning more about how people perceive others, how they participate in communities, and how behaviors are shaped.
Which of the following refers to the study of motion, angles, and behavior of projectile objects?
O A. serology
OB.
forensics
O C.
ballistics
OD.
trace evidence
O E.
blood spatter
Answer:. B. forensics
Answer:
C. ballistics
Explanation:
the science of dynamics that deals with the flight, behavior and effects of projectiles, especially bullets, unguided bombs, rockets, or the like; the science or art of designing and accelerating projectiles so as to achieve a desired performance.
FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT CASE BRIEF
FIND THE FOLLOWING CASE AND BRIEF IT...
KIRKPATRICK V. ETC, INTERNATIONAL, 493 U.S. 400 (1990)
When briefing the case it needs to have a paragraph each for the facts, issues, rule, answer and the conclusion
Kirkpatrick v. Environmental Tectonics Corp., International, 493 U.S. 400 (1990) is a case that focuses on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).
ETC International is a company that provides simulation and control systems to aerospace, aviation, and defense industries. In an attempt to secure a contract with the Mexican government, ETC made several payments to Mexican officials in the early 1980s. Kirkpatrick, a shareholder of ETC, sued the company, claiming that these payments were made to obtain favorable treatment and violate the FCPA.Facts:Environmental Tectonics Corp. (ETC) is a firm based in Pennsylvania that offers simulation and control systems for aviation, aerospace, and defense businesses. In the early 1980s, the company sought to secure a contract with the Mexican government and, as part of that effort, made various payments to Mexican officials. Kirkpatrick, a shareholder of ETC, filed a suit against the firm, alleging that the payments were made to secure favorable treatment and that the payments were in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).Issues:The issue at hand is whether Environmental Tectonics Corporation (ETC) made payments to Mexican officials in the early 1980s to secure a contract with the Mexican government. In addition, whether the payments were made to gain a favorable treatment or violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).Rule:The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) is a U.S. law enacted in 1977 that makes it unlawful for companies that trade in the United States to pay bribes to foreign officials to obtain business deals.Answer:The United States Supreme Court, in this case, ruled in favor of Environmental Tectonics Corporation (ETC) and overturned the decision of the Court of Appeals. The Court held that the FCPA did not apply to this case since the payments made by ETC were not in connection with obtaining or retaining business. The Court also held that the SEC cannot enforce the FCPA with a civil action, and only the Department of Justice (DOJ) can. Finally, the Court found that a private party has no right of action under the FCPA.In conclusion, the Court's decision in Kirkpatrick v. Environmental Tectonics Corp., International, 493 U.S. 400 (1990), clarified the scope and limits of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Although ETC made payments to Mexican officials, the Court held that the payments did not violate the FCPA because they were not made in connection with obtaining or retaining business. As a result, the Court overturned the decision of the Court of Appeals and held that Kirkpatrick had no right of action under the FCPA.
To Know More about obtaining visit:
brainly.com/question/2075542
#SPJ11
Binding versus Persuasive Authority. A county court in Illinois is deciding a case involving an issue that has never been addressed before in that state’s courts. The Iowa Supreme Court, however, recently decided a case involving a very similar fact pattern. Is the Illinois court obligated to follow the Iowa Supreme Court’s decision on the issue? If the United States Supreme Court had decided a similar case, would that decision be binding on the Illinois court? Explain. (See The Common Law.)
Answer:yes it would be
Explanation:
letter to a prospective candidate, application, regarding a citizen police academy.
Answer:
this is an example:
Brenda Ames
November 8, 2017
Mr. Matthew Richards
HR Manager
City of Some town
5 City Hall Ave.
Some town, CO 55555
Dear Mr. Richards:
I was interested to read City of Sometown’s posting on Monster for an entry-level police officer. For as long as I can remember I’ve wanted to pursue a career in law enforcement, and the opportunity to serve and protect within my hometown community is my dream job.
Here’s why I am a strong candidate for this position:
Training & Credentials: After graduating top of my class to earn my Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) certification, I pursued an AAS in law enforcement from XYZ Community College. Last month I earned my degree with honors, along with CPR and first aid certifications. As a result of this training, I offer a solid foundation in police fundamentals.
Community-Minded: As a native of Some town, I am deeply committed to the welfare of the community. After graduating from Some town High School, I stayed active in my local church and Kiwanis Club. These close community ties will assist in fostering positive relationships and furthering police-community goodwill.
Sincerely,
Brenda Ames
______________________ law deals with crimes but ______________ law governs disputes between individuals
Answer:
Criminal law deals with crimes but civil law governs disputes between individuals.
Explanation:
Criminal law deals with crimes but Civil Law governs disputes between individuals.
What do you mean by Civil Law?
Civil law deals with disputes between individuals, organizations, and many more while Criminal Law is a legal entity that deals with crime and legal punishment for criminal offenses.
Civil law deals with disputes between individuals, organizations, or between the two, in which compensation is paid to the victim.
Thus, Criminal law deals with crimes but Civil Law governs disputes between individuals.
Learn more about Civil law:
https://brainly.com/question/493036
#SPJ4
which of the following is not true of couples who cohabitate before marriage as compared to those who do not live together
Cohabiting couples, as a whole, have the same level of commitment to each other and the relationship that married couples do is not true of couples who cohabitate before marriage as compared to those who do not live together.
Regarding the levels of commitment between married couples and cohabiting couples, studies are not unanimous. Cohabiting couples may be less committed and more likely to end their relationship than married couples, according to some studies, while married couples may be more committed overall.
Additionally, research suggests that couples who live together before getting married are more likely to get divorced than those who do not. It is crucial to remember that every person's situation is unique, so generalizations about cohabitation shouldn't be made based on them.
The question is incomplete, complete question is "Which of the following is NOT a reason why an older person might choose to cohabit rather than marry?
cohabiting couples are more likely than married couples to split up because of conflicts about money
Cohabitation is most common among people with lower levels of education and income
Most cohabiting relationships do not last longer than two years
Cohabiting couples, as a whole, have the same level of commitment to each other and the relationship that married couples do"
Learn more about Cohabiting couples at:
brainly.com/question/31749142
#SPJ4
Which clause has been used by the Supreme Court to apply the Bill of Rights to state laws?
The clause that has been used by the Supreme Court to apply the Bill of Rights to state laws is the "Incorporation Doctrine" or the "Selective Incorporation Doctrine."
The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States federal court system. It was established by the United States Constitution and is responsible for interpreting and upholding the Constitution and federal laws. The Court is composed of nine justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate.
The Supreme Court has both original jurisdiction, which means it can hear certain cases directly, and appellate jurisdiction, which means it reviews decisions made by lower courts. The Court hears cases on a wide range of issues, including constitutional law, civil rights, criminal law, and federal law.
The decisions made by the Supreme Court are extremely influential and can have far-reaching consequences. The Court's rulings can shape public policy, impact civil liberties, and even change the course of history.
To learn more about Supreme Court visit here:
brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4