According to the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, the person who republishes a libel is subject to the same liability as the one who published it originally.
In Alabama, anyone who republishes a libel is subject to the same liability as the one who originally published it. This includes any person or entity who re-broadcasts an unlawful statement, reprints it in a book, continues to host it on a website, or speaks it out loud. The person or entity who originally published a libelous statement is typically held liable first, but if the libel is republished by another party, that person or entity may also be held accountable.
Furthermore, even if the party who republished the libel did not know it was false or did not intend to harm the subject, they may still be liable for damages. If a party can prove actual malice, then the damages may be significantly more. Liability for the republication of libelous statements can be a serious issue that should be taken seriously.
To know more about Liability 8 , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30805836
#SPJ4
Texas annexation was not at the forefront of American politics until President John Tyler used it as a rallying cry for his bid for reelection in 1844. Identify the statements that describe the reactions of the nation to the annexation of Texas.
Henry Clay and Martin Van Buren, the prospective presidential candidates from both the Whig and Democratic parties, met and agreed to reject the immediate annexation of Texas on the grounds it might lead war to Mexico
A letter by Secretary of State John C. Calhoun to President Tyler was leaked to the press and linked the idea of absorbing Texas directly to the goal of strengthening slavery in the United States
Both of the statements in the question above describe the reactions of the nation to the annexation of Texas.
Annexation of Texas refers to the incorporation of Texas as a state of the United States in 1845. Texas had previously been an independent country after gaining its independence from Mexico in 1836. The annexation of Texas was a contentious issue at the time, as it would upset the balance of free and slave states in the United States and could potentially lead to war with Mexico.
Some people believed that it was necessary to expand American territory and strengthen the country's economic and political power. Others were concerned about the issue of slavery, as Texas was a slave state, and the annexation would upset the balance of free and slave states in the United States. Some people also believed that the annexation would lead to war with Mexico, as Mexico still considered Texas to be a part of its territory. These concerns proved to be valid, as the annexation of Texas was one of the causes of the Mexican-American War in 1846.
The annexation of Texas was a significant event in American history, as it expanded the territory of the United States and played a role in the conflict with Mexico.
Learn more about Texas annexation at https://brainly.com/question/13518029
#SPJ11
in a nontaxable exchange between unrelated parties, are the amount realized by the parties always equal?
In a nontaxable exchange between unrelated parties, the amount realized by the parties may not always be equal.
The amount realized by each party is the value of the property or asset received in the exchange.
However, in some cases, the value of the property received by one party may be different from the value of the property given up by that party. This could happen if the parties are exchanging assets with different values or if there are other considerations involved in the exchange, such as the assumption of liabilities or the receipt of cash or other assets in addition to the property being exchanged.
In any case, as long as the exchange meets the requirements for a nontaxable exchange, such as being for like-kind property and meeting certain timing and other conditions, the parties may be able to defer recognition of any gain or loss on the exchange until a future taxable event occurs.
Learn more about nontaxable here:
https://brainly.com/question/30397168
#SPJ11
How does social change happen?
Answer:
social change happens by getting into a relationship, having a friend, new electronics
Explanation:
Even though moral laws, cultural norms, divine laws, civil or statutory laws, mathematical laws and logical laws may all be described as normative laws not empirical laws, they vary in their modes of enforcement. Using at least three (3) practical examples, show the difference (s). Your response should also discuss the following:
a) the legal may not necessarily be moral (in the universal sense of the term)
b) the culturally acceptable may not necessarily be moral (in the universal sense of the term)
c) the religiously sanctioned may not necessarily be moral (in the universal sense of the term).
The purposes and explanations of the law generally as well as specific legal norms are addressed by the normative legal theory. It aspires to direct human behavior by providing motivation for action.
What are empirical laws?Empirical laws are refers to legislation that is based on facts rather than assumptions and makes decisions based on deep observation of evidence.
Natural law refers to the ethical rules that can be developed by rational thought. The natural law idea holds that our civil regulations should be based on morals and ethics.
Learn more about normative laws, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28367010
#SPJ1
a) The legal may not necessarily be moral (in the universal sense of the term):
One example is the historical existence of laws that enforced racial segregation and discrimination, such as Jim Crow laws in the United States.
These laws were legal at the time but widely recognized as morally unjust and discriminatory.
b) b) The culturally acceptable may not necessarily be moral (in the universal sense of the term):
In some cultures, practices like female genital mutilation might be considered culturally acceptable.
However, these practices are often viewed as morally wrong and harmful from a broader, universal moral perspective.
c) The religiously sanctioned may not necessarily be moral (in the universal sense of the term):
Certain religious practices, like religiously motivated violence or discrimination against certain groups, may be sanctioned within specific religious frameworks.
However, these actions can be considered morally wrong by those who do not share the same religious beliefs or by broader moral standards.
Thus, many things are legal or culturally acceptable, or religiously sanctioned, don't mean they are moral.
Learn more about morals here:
https://brainly.com/question/10492351
#SPJ6
______a set of laws in the south that enforced racial segregation
Ms. Bosman writes that the verdict is being seen by some as “a win for the notion of self-defense” and others as “a failure of the criminal justice system.” Do you think this verdict should be seen as a symbol for broader issues? If so, which ones? If not, why?
The acquittal of Mr. Kyle Rittenhouse, who killed two men and wounded another in a riot against the killing of Jacob Blake, who was protesting the police brutality against George Floyd, can only be seen as a symbol of America's racial divide.
The question is, was Mr. Rittenhouse right to carry a gun at 17 years when he was attending to keep the peace and provide medical aid to protesters? At his age then, was Mr. Rittenhouse authorized to belong to a Vigilante Group that could keep the peace in racial protests?
Thus, given Mr. Rittenhouse's age and the purpose of his presence at the scene of rioting, the verdict that acquitted him is bound to attract controversy concerning broader issues of vigilantism, gun rights, and proper definition of self-defense.
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/25716779
The Fourteenth Amendment establishes that no state can be allowed to remove any rights of citizens, that all persons who are born in the US or naturalized have citizenship regardless of race, that no person can be denied equal protection under the law, and that no person can be deprived of his or life, liberty, or property without a fair trial.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The 14th Amendment is an amendment to the constitution of the United States of America and it addresses the issue of civil and legal rights for the African American citizens and slaves who had gained freedom after the American Civil War. The 14th Amendment is made up of the clause known as the equal protection of the laws.
An equal protection is a clause that states and guarantees that no state and local governments shall make or enforce any law which would contravene the privileges, rights or immunities of all persons born or naturalized in the United States of America.
Simply stated, the equal protection guarantees that all citizens will be treated equally by the law. Also, the equal protection clause took effect in the United States of America in 1868.
A local court always has the groups to exercise personal jurisdiction when a criminal actor provides information from a website (T/F).
The statement "A local court always has the right to exercise personal jurisdiction when a criminal actor provides information from a website" is false. The correct statement is that a local court does not always have the right to exercise personal jurisdiction when a criminal actor provides information from a website.
Personal jurisdiction is a legal term that refers to a court's authority over a party. To have personal jurisdiction over a party, the court must have the ability to make decisions and enforce its judgments on the party. Personal jurisdiction can be acquired by a court in a variety of ways, including through the defendant's consent or by the court's own jurisdictional authority.A criminal actor may provide information from a website that may cause harm, but it does not necessarily mean that a local court has personal jurisdiction over that actor. Personal jurisdiction must be established based on the specific circumstances of each case. It can be established through the defendant's contacts with the state or through specific legal provisions, such as the long-arm statute, which allows courts to have jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants who have conducted business or committed a tort in the state.Learn more about local court: https://brainly.com/question/2514388
#SPJ11
4000 x 4000 max you answer
Answer:
16000000
Explanation:
Answer:
16000000
Explanation:
should hate speech be regulated? (in a 5 page essay form)
Answer:
No since it can cause people to harm others because of their nationality and their ethnicity. That’s the reason why the law didn’t regulate hate speeches, it only makes people hate each other and they know it isn’t right.
Explanation:
this is all i can come up with ill do some more
What is the cost/benefit analysis that is used to help make decisions?
Firms who are low-cost leaders _____.
are able to generate more profit because they are generally able to price higher than their rivals.
are able to generate more profit because they are generally unable to price higher than their rivals.
are able to generate more profit because they are generally lower cost producers than their rivals.
do not generally have an advantage over their rivals.
Firms that are low-cost leaders are able to generate more profit because they are generally able to price higher than their rivals. Thus, option A is correct.
It is tempting to develop cost leaders as businesses that offer products and services of poor quality at exorbitant costs. A company that employs a cost leadership strategy provides a wide range of clients with goods and services at competitive prices that are of good quality and quality-richness.
It is also sometimes called a strong value proposition when a price and value are both reasonable. Companies using a cost-leadership strategy aim to generate a profit by combining high sales with a low per-unit profit.
To learn more about cost-leadership
brainly.com/question/13077606
#SPJ4
In Los Angeles, California, does the Retro Game Camp reopen?
Answer:
It is open!
Explanation:
according to its twitter, its open. Hours: Mon, Wed, Thur, Sat, Sun 12:00-7:00PM
If your license has been suspended, you must do the following to reinstate your license
Answer:
The steps to reinstate a suspended license can vary depending on the reason for the suspension and the state in which you live. However, some common steps that may be required include:
Paying any outstanding fines or fees associated with the suspension
Completing any required court-ordered classes or programs
Completing any required community service
Providing proof of insurance if the suspension was related to a car accident or traffic violation
Passing any required driving tests or vehicle inspections
Paying a reinstatement fee to the state Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV)
It's important to check with your state's DMV for specific instructions and requirements for reinstating a suspended license. Some states may also require an SR-22 form, a document proving that you have the required insurance for your state.
Explain why each of these objectives is so important for transforming policing in South
Africa for a new era of “democratic policing”. In other words, explain how achieving each
of these objectives would help to make it possible for government to create what the White
Paper calls “democratic policing”.
[25 Marks]
To prepare Africa for a new era of "democratic policing" The new police force is making an effort to transform from a past of violent and indiscriminate violence into a respected democratic police force.
Has South Africa's community policing programme been a success?Due to financial support from residents and their willingness to stop crime, community policing has been most effective in wealthy (typically white) regions. Even yet, it might be challenging to gauge how it affects crime reduction.
What was the name of the first democratic law in South Africa?In order to oversee the transitional phase following the end of apartheid, the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1993, often known as the Interim Constitution, was adopted. It first introduced universal adult suffrage, the cornerstone of a modern democracy.
To know more about democratic policing visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/11460279
#SPJ1
Question 4 of 10
In what way have laws about sexual orientation impacted HR management?
A. It means HR managers must work to close the wage-gap
throughout an organization.
B. It means HR managers must create policies that prevent
discrimination.
c. It means HR managers must provide work visas to all employees.
D. It means HR managers must prepare for an increasingly aging
workforce.
SUBMIT
It means HR managers must work to close the wage-gap throughout an organization in the way have laws about sexual orientation impacted HR management. Thus, option (a) is correct.
What is management?The term “management” refers to the act of managing. The management of the business activities. Management is the basis of art, science, and the profession. Management are they manage the organization. Management are based of the different functions are the step by step.
According to the HR management, is the department of the organization. The HR management was the main work to the hiring and the firing. There were the laws on the sexual orientation impacted HR managers must work to close the wage-gap throughout an organization.
As a result, the HR managers must work to close the wage-gap throughout an organization in the way have laws about sexual orientation impacted HR management. Therefore, option (a) is correct.
Learn more about on HR management, here;
https://brainly.com/question/25806768
#SPJ5
When selecting ammunition you must choose the correct cartridge or shotshell for your firearm. What else should you consider?
Part I) The Great Depression nicely illustrates the concept of complexity because there probably was no single cause for it, but rather a combination of causes.
A) True
B) False
Part II) Ida B. Wells well illustrates the power of the pen in that her work as a journalist helped expose the inherent evils of Jim Crow laws in the South.
A) True
B) False
Part I) The Great Depression nicely illustrates the concept of complexity because there probably was no single cause for it, but rather a combination of causes is True. The Great Depression of the 1930s was a severe economic crisis that lasted from 1929 until the late 1930s, affecting countries worldwide.
The concept of complexity explains that the Great Depression was complex, which means it was caused by a combination of different factors rather than a single cause.The economic boom in the 1920s that preceded the Great Depression created an environment of great optimism. However, the stock market crash of October 1929 marked the beginning of the Great Depression, causing mass unemployment, homelessness, and poverty. The Great Depression resulted from a combination of events, including the stock market crash, banking system failures, reductions in spending and investment, and other factors.
Part II) Ida B. Wells well illustrates the power of the pen in that her work as a journalist helped expose the inherent evils of Jim Crow laws in the South is True. Ida B. Wells was an African American journalist, activist, and educator who was born in Holly Springs, Mississippi, in 1862. Wells's work as a journalist helped to expose the evils of the Jim Crow laws in the South. She wrote numerous articles and pamphlets denouncing the racial segregation laws, and her work inspired others to fight against racial injustice in the United States. Her powerful writing helped to expose the brutal lynching of black Americans, and she was a strong advocate for women's suffrage. Wells was a powerful voice for change, and her work continues to inspire others to fight for justice and equality.
To know more about Great Depression visit-
brainly.com/question/9057117
#SPJ11
terrance is looking to find the law that georgia passed in regard to mud flaps required on 18-wheel semi-trucks. where would he look to find the law?
Terrance is looking to find the law that Georgia passed in regard to mud flaps required on 18-wheel semi-trucks. he would look to find the law in state codes.
What is state codes?
The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) produced the ISO 3166 standard, which provides codes for the names of the major subdivisions (such as provinces or states) of all nations codified in ISO 3166-1. ISO 3166-2:IN is the entry for India in ISO 3166-2.
Currently, 28 states and 8 union territories in India have their ISO 3166-2 codes specified.
Each code has two sections that are separated by a hyphen. The ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 code for India is IN, which is the first component. With certain exceptions, the second component, which consists of two letters, is presently used on automobile licence plates.
To study more about state codes
https://brainly.com/question/24065560
#SPJ4
Until the 1990s identifying the blood type of a sample was the best forensic scientist could do in terms of linking a blood sample to a particular person. True or false
Answer:
the answer should be false
sorry if im wrong
Explanation:
no system of federal (national) courts was created. individual states could create their own courts within their state. what was some problems with this law
The lack of a federal court system under this law led to inconsistency, lack of uniformity, difficulty in resolving interstate disputes, and challenges in enforcing national laws and protecting individual rights.
Some problems with the law that allowed individual states to create their own courts without a federal court system were:
1. Inconsistency in laws: Since each state had its own court system, different interpretations of the Constitution and laws could lead to inconsistency across states.
2. Lack of uniformity: The absence of a federal court system meant that there was no uniformity in the application of laws across the nation.
3. Difficulty in resolving interstate disputes: Without a federal court system, it was challenging to resolve disputes between states, as each state's court might favor their own state's interests.
4. Inability to enforce national laws: The lack of a federal court system made it difficult for the national government to enforce its laws consistently across all states.
5. Limited protection of individual rights: Without a federal court system to ensure the consistent interpretation and protection of individual rights, citizens' rights could vary significantly from state to state.
To know more about national laws , refer here
https://brainly.com/question/8867273#
#SPJ11
why ethics is a crucial subject that needs to be taken into account?
Answer:
In the illustrating portion underneath the description of the issue is summarized.
Explanation:
Appropriate ethical practice regarding ethics was significant although a multitude of considerations would be taken into consideration. Initially, accountants also have confidential access to important customer records, including certain social security details and documentation or an individual's financial account number.Under the common law, from the 1500s until today, the law has allowed past property owners to place limitations on the uses of real property in the future through the use of covenants (promises) as set forth in real property deeds as well as use of the fee defeasible estates (i.e. "To John Doe, so long as the property is used as a tobacco farm") and the evolution of zoning statutes and practice. Thomas Jefferson argued vehemently that no past owner of real property (dead or alive) should be allowed to restrict a future owner of real property concerning its present use; however, the Virginia State Legislature disagreed with him and land use limitation continues today. Jefferson described this practice as "Allowing the dead to control the lands of the living."Was Jefferson right, or should we maintain the practice of allowing past property owners to place land use limitations in deeds of lands sold or gifted? Further, should the government be allowed to determine how a private property owner uses his/her respective land?
Answer:
v
Explanation:
h
Which of the following would be considered an example of "shaping moral standards," as
seen as a function of the law?
A) laws granting freedom of speech and religion
B) laws discouraging drug and alcohol abuse
C) laws providing rights to peaceful protest
D) laws preventing overthrow of the government
As per the given question, the example of shaping moral standards, as seen as a function of the law is laws discouraging drug and alcohol abuse.
There is no denying that the law plays a significant role in shaping moral standards. Laws act as a framework for social interactions and behavior in society. They often establish what is and is not acceptable in society. A moral standard is a moral value that is considered to be good or bad.
Morals are developed through socialization and passed down through generations as acceptable behaviors. There are several examples of how the law shapes moral standards, including granting freedom of speech and religion, providing rights to peaceful protest, discouraging drug and alcohol abuse, and preventing overthrow of the government.
The law has a significant influence on what is and is not acceptable in society. The legal prohibition of certain substances, such as drugs and alcohol, plays a role in shaping moral standards.
The law is designed to protect society from harmful substances and, in the process, shape the moral standards of society.
To know more about moral standards, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28953158#
#SPJ11
Democratic vs Republican view on gun control
Which of the following cases examined a state law that required all children to attend school through the twelfth grade in order to promote the general welfare of its citizens?Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)
Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972) Under the Free Activity Condition of the Primary Correction, a state regulation expecting that kids go to class past eighth grade disregards the guardians' sacred right to coordinate the strict childhood of their youngsters.
What occurred for the situation Wisconsin v. Yoder?
Yoder, legitimate case in which the U.S. High Court on May 15, 1972, managed (7-0) that Wisconsin's mandatory school participation regulation was unlawful as applied to the Amish (basically individuals from the Old Request Amish Mennonite Church), since it disregarded their Most memorable Change right to free activity of religion.
What occurred in the Schenck versus U.S. case?
In Schenck v. US, Charles Schenck was charged under the Reconnaissance Represent mailing printed booklets incredulous of the tactical draft. Composing for a consistent Court, Equity Oliver Wendell Holmes maintained Schenck's conviction and decided that the Reconnaissance Act didn't struggle with the Principal Revision.
For what reason was the case Griffin v Wisconsin so critical?
In Griffin versus Wisconsin, the U.S. High Court held that the warrantless hunt of a probationer's home for this situation didn't disregard the fourth amendment.
Learn more about Yoder here:
https://brainly.com/question/14786164
#SPJ1
Which of the following statements is true of the law of diminishing marginal utility?
The law of diminishing marginal utility states that as more units of a good are consumed, the marginal utility from the consumption of the next unit becomes lesser.
The law of diminishing marginal utility states that as more units of a good are consumed, the marginal utility from the consumption of the next unit becomes lesser. This statement is true of the law of diminishing marginal utility.
he Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility states that if a single product or service is consumed in large quantities, the utility or satisfaction derived from each extra unit consumed eventually falls. As a result, the marginal utility of consumption decreases. The Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility is one of the most critical principles of microeconomics. The Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility applies to both goods and services.
The concept may be extended to the economic concepts of demand and budgeting, as well as other aspects of microeconomics. The law of diminishing marginal utility also asserts that people are inclined to choose the goods and services that provide them with the greatest amount of satisfaction or utility. The Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility, for example, can be used to explain why individuals may choose to buy several types of goods, even if the marginal utility of consuming these goods is low.
For more such questions on law of diminishing marginal utility
https://brainly.com/question/15050855
#SPJ11
Which laws protect citizens from human rights violations?
Answer:
the human right to live
Explanation:
What is required to become a reserve police officer with most police departments? The candidate must have served in the military. The candidate must have served as a police officer for at least ten years before applying. The candidate must be personally recommended for the position by the police chief and a member of the mayor’s staff. The candidate must complete the same training as a regular police officer.
Answer:
The candidate must complete the same training as a regular police officer.
Explanation:
In Indiana, reserve officers are required to complete 40 hours of basic training, as well as 24 hours of continuing in-service training each year
how to be smart like beetleguese
Answer:
that’s a hard one