Answer:
what should i do?
Explanation:
i dont understand im sorry
3 impotence in of historical site
Answer:
Why preserve cultural and historical sites? The heritage of a place is what sets it apart from all other places. Preserving places remembers the past while preparing for the future. Preserving places saves the culture of the persons who came before.
Explanation:
have a nice day.
What was seen as the flaw in the articles of confederation during the constitutional convention
The Articles of Confederation stood as the first constitution for the United States. The Articles were comprehended as existing very weak and showing little power to the federal, or national, government. Under the Articles of Confederation, the state could not tax the states, recruit soldiers, regulate trade, or make and implement laws properly.
What was seen as the mark in the Articles of Confederation during the Constitutional Convention?The Articles of Confederation stood as the first constitution embraced by the recently independent American states. The design of this constitution provided much of the energy to the state governments. This existed driven by the perceived misusage of power by King George III when the Americans stood still parts of the British Empire. Many Americans stood weary of a powerful federal government.
Due to this fear, the Articles of Confederation made a federal government with virtually no power. This constitution did not authorize the federal government to increase taxes, regulate trade, or force states to observe laws enacted by the federal government. Eventually, this constitution exists returned with the US Constitution we utilize today after approximately 10 years of use.
Therefore, the correct answer is option D. They weren't specific enough about Congress ability to enforce the Articles.
To learn more about the Articles of Confederation refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/3148567
#SPJ9
The complete question is:
What was seen as the flaw in the Articles of Confederation during the Constitutional Convention?
A. They gave the federal government too much power and the states not enough
B. They gave too many rights to Black people, indigenous people, and white women
C. They didn't distinguish between the rights of men who owned land and those who didn't
D. They weren't specific enough about Congress ability to enforce the Articles
The American declaration of independence was in
The American Declaration of Independence was adopted on July 4, 1776.
1. The American Declaration of Independence was a significant document in the history of the United States, marking its formal separation from Great Britain.
2. The declaration was adopted on July 4, 1776, by the Second Continental Congress.
3. The process leading up to the declaration began in the early stages of the American Revolutionary War when the Thirteen Colonies sought to establish their independence from British rule.
4. Thomas Jefferson, along with a committee of four others, was tasked with drafting the document. Jefferson is often credited as the primary author of the Declaration of Independence.
5. The declaration was influenced by Enlightenment ideas of individual rights and the social contract theory, which emphasized that governments derive their authority from the consent of the governed.
6. The document outlined a list of grievances against King George III and the British Parliament, accusing them of violating the colonists' rights and liberties.
7. It also asserted the natural rights of all individuals, including the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
8. The declaration proclaimed that the colonies were now free and independent states, no longer under British rule.
9. The adoption of the declaration marked a critical turning point in the American Revolution, inspiring patriots and solidifying support for the cause of independence.
10. The declaration's impact extended beyond the borders of the United States, inspiring movements for independence and democracy around the world.
For more such questions on American Declaration, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/1809378
#SPJ8
“united in diversity” is the agreed upon EU motto. explain your opinion in one paragraph
Answer:
Explanation: It signifies how Europeans have come together, in the form of the EU, to work for peace and prosperity, while at the same time being enriched by the continent's many different cultures, traditions and languages.
Specialization includes people who
A. are very good at one skill.
B. grow all their own food.
C. speak one language very well.
D. can solve almost any problem.
Option (a), The only answer to this issue's specialization-related question is that specialization involves individuals who are extremely skilled at a single skill.
What is a person's area of expertise?A specialization in your field of work is a subset of knowledge. Your competency may be tied to your degree program if you completed a double major, a major with a minor, a major with a certification, a major with a topic emphasis, or practical training in a field of study.
What academic field do you concentrate in?A specialization is a specific area of study that is tied to a particular degree and has additional courses. A specialty is a narrowly focused topic of study connected to a particular major that is taken in addition to the courses required for the major.
Learn more about specialization: https://brainly.com/question/28331255
#SPJ1
example of how the modern world economy has led to similar effects of global exchange
Answer:
Globalization has led to increases in standards of living around the world, but not all of its effects are positive for everyone.
Explanation:
Free trade agreements, such the North American Free Trade Agreement and the Trans-Pacific Partnership are examples of economic globalization. Multinational corporations, which operate in two or more countries, play a large role in economic globalization. Political globalization.
someone please help!
Answer:
Most effective - Practice quiz
Second most effective - Interleaved practice
Moderately effective - Highlight
Moderately effective - Keyword mnemonics
Explanation:
Helppp me plisssssss!!!!!!
Answer:
Explanation:
NAACP
Objective:It aimed to maintain equality, inform the public, and educate people about their rights. It also aimed to remove prejudices, barriers, and racial discrimination.
Views on segregation :W.E.B. DuBois, Mary White Ovington, Moorfield Storey, and Ida B. Wells established the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) in 1909. Its goal was to use the legal system to combat the segregation of african americans and Whites.It actively tried to remove these barriers on people of color.
Views on American society:
The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People's (NAACP) goal is to ensure that all people have equal political, educational, social, and economic rights and to end the race-based inferiority complex. The NAACP diverged racist ideologies that frightened and separated people of color. They were an intellectual group that helped to launch fairer schooling, kinder housing, and anti-lynching campaigns. They believed that all people deserved to be treated with justice, compassion, and equality, and they campaigned to promote good change in America.
UNIA
Objective: It aimed to instill African American and black nationalistic pride. Many wanted to create their own African country and create prosperity away from white people.
Views on segregation: It approved of segregation and believed black people must prosper without any white interference.Marcus Garvey, the head of UNIA at the time, felt that white people would never accept black persons as equals, even in a non-segregated society. As a result, he felt that black people should split from whites and establish their own civilization.
Views on American society:
They believed that all people should be treated with fairness, compassion, and equality, and they worked to effect good change in American history. They see American society as utterly corrupt and imprisoned in evil, with no prospect of redemption or escape from inside.
If one was to question which empire (the Spanish or the British) was more immediately successful, the answer would be the Spanish. Yet, in the long run, the Spanish empire stagnated politically, socially, and economically, while the British empire was thriving. What factors do you believe account for the success of the British empire in the long run?
Some of the factors that drove long-term British success were:
They allowed privatization. They ruthlessly took land from Natives. Engaged in divide and conquer tactics. Why was the British empire so successful?The British government allowed for private companies to take over other lands in its name. This allowed for British influence to spread at little government cost.
The British also took land and other resources from defeated Natives in ruthless form. When they didn't have the numbers, they would divide Natives against each other and subjugate them in turns.
Find out more on the British empire at https://brainly.com/question/18307514.
#SPJ1
15. A _______ government was to blame for the economic and other problems in the United States after the Revolution
Answer:
Confederation
Explanation:
the development of the United States as it transitions from a Pre-Columbian, Native American settlement to a British colony and then into a young and growing country that is experimenting with democracy and a more inclusive form of government protecting citizens with laws.
The United States has complex history that includes the development of Native American civilizations, colonization by European powers, and establishment of an independent nation.
What is colonization?Colonization is the process by which a powerful country or group of people takes control of a territory or region and establishes political and economic dominance over it. This can involve the settlement of people from the colonizing country in the new territory, often at the expense of the native population. Colonization has historically been driven by various motivations, such as acquiring resources, expanding territory, or spreading a particular culture or religion. It has often resulted in the displacement, exploitation, and oppression of the colonized people, leading to significant social and cultural changes. Many former colonies continue to experience the lasting effects of colonization, including economic inequality, political instability, and cultural conflict.
To learn more about colonization, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11868143
#SPJ1
Which 20th-century Chinese leader launched the Cultural Revolution, which
led to widespread chaos in China and the near failure of its economy?
Answer:
Mao Zedong
Explanation:
Launched by Mao Zedong, Chairman of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and founder of the People's Republic of China (PRC), its stated goal was to preserve Chinese communism by purging remnants of capitalist and traditional elements from Chinese society.
Perform online research and read Federalist papers 10 and Federalist 51. Select passages from Federalist 10 and Federalist 51 that explain the reasons checks and balances are necessary. Explain the benefit of separation of powers as a way to address the reasons for checks and balances.
Answer:
Explanation:
From Federalist No. 10:
"Liberty is to be found only in a society of laws and not of men. ...If a majority be united by a common interest, the rights of the minority will be insecure...To secure the public good and private rights against the danger of such a faction, and at the same time preserve the spirit and the form of popular government, is then the great object to which our inquiries are directed..."
Here, Madison argues that checks and balances are needed to prevent the "tyranny of the majority" and protect the rights and interests of minorities. Factions must be controlled to secure liberty and the public good.
From Federalist No. 51:
"In a word, as liberty can have nothing to fear from the judiciary alone, but would have every thing to fear from its union with either of the other departments; that as all the effects of such a union must ensue from a dependence of the former on the latter, notwithstanding a nominal and apparent separation; that as, from the natural feebleness of the judiciary, it is in continual jeopardy of being over-awed, and forced to an exercise of its functions in subservience to the legislative or executive will; and, finally, that all the conventional checks upon the legislature will not form an effectual barrier against its encroachments, - it is far more rational to conclude, that a accusations made against a single branch of the Government, would rarely be, if ever, justified."
Here, Hamilton argues that separation of powers with checks and balances is necessary to prevent any one branch from having too much control or "tyranny". No branch alone can threaten liberty, but together they could undermine it, thus checks are needed to maintain separation and balance of power.
In summary, the key benefits of separation of powers with checks and balances are:
Prevents "tyranny of the majority" by protecting minority rights. No single faction controls government power.
Prevents consolidation of power in one branch. Power remains balanced and separated.
Secures liberty by making oppression difficult. Tyranny would require cooperation of multiple branches against their own self-interest.
Upholds the system of American republican self-government. Checks and balances are integral to the Constitution's design.
On which idea did Patriots and Loyalists most agree
Answer:
The American Revolution would vastly alter the government of the colonies.
What is the fisherman’s motivation for asking the genius if he really was in the vase? to make the genius grant him three wishes to try to find a way to stay alive to see if the genius was lying to have more time before the genius kills him
Answer:
The fisherman asked a tricky question to the genius in order to save his life. He expressed his surprise as to how it would be possible that some so giant can be easily fit inside such a small vase. The genius fell into the trap of the fisherman. He gave an illustration and went inside the vase in the form of smoke. The fisherman closed the knob of the vase and in this way the genius was again trapped inside the vase. The fisherman saved his life from the genius by using his presence of mind.
The native population of the Spanish colonies declined rapidly between 1519 and 1605. Why did the native population decrease at such a drastic rate? Include at least three reasons in your explanation. How did the Spanish government respond to the decline
I JUST NEED TO KNOW HOW THE SPANISH GOVERMENT RESPONED TO THE DECLINE!
Answer:
The Spanish government responded to the decline in the native population of their colonies in a variety of ways, including attempts to regulate the treatment of Indigenous peoples and efforts to import African slaves as a labor source.
One of the earliest responses was the encomienda system, which was a labor system that granted Spanish settlers the right to use Indigenous peoples for labor in exchange for their protection and religious instruction. However, the encomienda system often led to the exploitation and abuse of Indigenous peoples, and the Spanish government attempted to regulate it in the mid-16th century.
Another response was the creation of the New Laws of 1542, which were designed to protect Indigenous peoples from abuse and exploitation. The laws abolished the encomienda system, established the rights of Indigenous peoples to own land, and limited the use of Indigenous labor. However, the New Laws were unpopular with many Spanish settlers, who saw them as a threat to their economic interests.
As the native population continued to decline, the Spanish government began to import African slaves as a labor source. African slaves were brought to the Americas in large numbers from the late 16th century onwards, and their labor was used to support the growing colonial economies.
References:
Gibson, C. (1966). The Aztecs under Spanish rule: A history of the Indians of the Valley of Mexico, 1519-1810. Stanford University Press.
Lockhart, J. (1991). The men of Cajamarca: A social and biographical study of the first conquerors of Peru. University of Texas Press.
Mancall, P. C. (2009). Fatal journey: The final expedition of Henry Hudson. Basic Books.
Which of the following statements BEST describes the Roman attitude towards family life?
Correct: 8
Incorrect: 1
Skip: 0
Find
Glossary
Tag
Romans believed in a matriarchal
society in which the family was
headed by the mother.
Women played important roles in
running the household and in the
raising of children.
B
The family was unimportant in Roman
society
D
Education of all children was
considered to be important.
Answer:
Family was unimportant to Roman Society
Explanation:
The Romans did not think children could have potential in life. They just looked at the child to see if he/she would be of any use to them.
HELP ME
Under Chairman Mao mentioned in the first paragraph, which economic
idea was introduced to increase production? 1.Scarcity 2.tax reform 3. Capitalism 4.communism
Answer:
Capitalism
Explanation:
Mao took NIxon's advice and changed his market into a capitalist and they are the only ones who still have this combination today
gov- communist
market- capitalist
1. What are the citizen's opinions of their leader, Kim Jong IL?
It is crucial to remember that North Korea is a very authoritarian state and that open criticism of the government is not accepted. The propaganda apparatus of the nation aims to establish a cult of personality around the ruling Kim family by portraying them as infallible and untouchable.
It is difficult to determine the true feelings of North Korean residents towards their leader, Kim Jong-il, given the country's extreme authoritarianism and the severe limits on press freedom and free speech.
The goal of the regime's propaganda machine is to elevate the Kim family to the status of an invincible cult of personality, and any criticism or dissent is harshly punished. It is also difficult to gather reliable information on the residents' opinions because the nation is essentially cut off from the outside world and its citizens are subject to strict government control and surveillance.
Speaking negatively about one's leader or the government was not acceptable, and North Korean civilians were subject to severe government supervision and censorship.
It is critical to remember that propaganda and the lack of access to fair information may have a significant influence on any opinions or information regarding Kim Jong-il and the North Korean leadership.
learn more about Kim Jong IL here
https://brainly.com/question/31171274
#SPJ1
What led to the divide of the Roman empire
Answer:
The Roman Empire had become too large to be ruled by one emperor by the third century (this was one of the causes of the Crisis of the Third Century). It was divided, by Emperor Diocletian, into a tetrarchy. This tetrarchy was then dissolved in favor of an Eastern and Western Roman Empire.
Answer:
If you are referring to the 3rd century the thing that led to the divide in the Roman Empire was a high populas. Because the population was growing so much it was decided that Rome would be split up with each part of it being governed by a different leader
what are the characteristics of authoritarianism? of totalitarianism? of despotism?
Answer:
Authoritarianism, totalitarianism, and despotism are all forms of government that have certain characteristics in common, but they are also distinct in some ways.
Characteristics of authoritarianism:
Limited political freedom and civil liberties
Strong centralized power and control over the government and society
A single leader or small group of leaders hold significant power
Limited or no participation in political decision-making
Repression of political opposition and control of the media
Characteristics of totalitarianism:
Total control over all aspects of society, including the economy, education, and culture
A single leader or small group of leaders hold absolute power
Limited or no political freedoms and civil liberties
Use of propaganda and control of the media to shape public opinion
Repression of political opposition and use of secret police to maintain control
A strong sense of nationalism and a cult of personality around the leader
Characteristics of despotism:
Absolute power is held by a single ruler
Limited or no political freedoms and civil liberties
No or limited participation in political decision-making
Repression of political opposition and control of the media
No or limited accountability for the ruler's actions
No or limited rule of law and arbitrary decision-making
It's worth noting that these forms of government can overlap and share characteristics with each other, but there are still clear distinctions between them.
Why did the French Huguenots move to Florida?
Answer:
to find gold necause of economic crisis
Answer: The French crown and the Huguenots led by Admiral Gaspard de Coligny believed that planting French settlers in Florida would help defuse religious conflicts in France and strengthen its own claim to a part of North America.
Location: Fort Caroline, Florida; Matanzas Inlet
Date: September 4 1565 - October 12, 1565
Explanation: Hopefully this helps you (Pls don't report if this answer is wrong)
The Soweto uprising in 1976 contributed largely in changing, among other things, the landscape of the education system in South Africa.
Write an essay to respond to the question: What can we learn from the youth of 1976, and are these lessons still applicable to the youth of today?
Answer:
The Soweto uprising of 1976 was a pivotal moment in South African history, as it marked the beginning of a widespread youth resistance against apartheid and contributed significantly to the eventual dismantling of the apartheid regime. The uprising was sparked by the government's decision to implement Afrikaans as the language of instruction in schools, which was seen as a move to further marginalize black students and undermine their education. The youth of 1976 played a critical role in challenging this injustice and fighting for their right to education. So, what can we learn from their actions, and are these lessons still applicable to the youth of today?
Firstly, the youth of 1976 showed us the power of collective action and the importance of solidarity in the face of oppression. The uprising was largely driven by young people who came together to protest against the government's decision, despite the risks involved. They recognized that they were stronger together than they were as individuals, and their collective action ultimately forced the government to reconsider its position. This lesson is still highly relevant to the youth of today, who continue to face various forms of discrimination and marginalization. By working together and standing in solidarity with one another, young people can create real change and challenge the status quo.
Secondly, the youth of 1976 demonstrated the importance of education as a tool for empowerment and liberation. They recognized that the government's decision to implement Afrikaans as the language of instruction was an attempt to limit their education and keep them oppressed. They protested not only for their right to education but also for their right to receive an education that was relevant to their experiences and culture. This lesson is still applicable to young people today, who must understand the value of education and its role in creating a more just and equitable society.
Thirdly, the youth of 1976 showed us that protest and civil disobedience can be effective tools for challenging injustice and creating change. The Soweto uprising was a peaceful protest that quickly turned violent as police responded with force, but the youth continued to resist in various ways. They boycotted classes, organized rallies, and used graffiti and posters to spread their message. Their actions inspired others to join the struggle and helped to shine a light on the injustices of apartheid. This lesson is still relevant today, as young people continue to fight for a more just and equitable society. By engaging in peaceful protest and civil disobedience, they can challenge the status quo and push for change.
In conclusion, the youth of 1976 set an inspiring example of resistance and resilience in the face of oppression. Their actions continue to inspire young people today, and the lessons they taught us about collective action, education, and civil disobedience remain highly relevant. By learning from their example and continuing to fight for justice and equality, young people can create a better future for themselves and for generations to come.
Explanation:
Explain why Africans in possession of Timbuktu manuscripts are reluctant to turn them over to libraries and other authorities?\GIVING BRAINLY TO WHOEVER ANSWERS RIGHT AND I WILL REPORT YOUR QUESTION IF ITS WRONG OR UNNECESSARY!!!!!!!! I WILL REPORT MORE THEN JUS YOU ANSWER!!
Answer:
Heritage
Explanation:
The Timbuktu manuscripts are handed down generation through generation, and contain the rich history and culture of the Malians and even copies of the Quran. Many Islamists also want to destroy these manuscripts because they conflict with their views of Islam, considering that the Malians version of Islam is more of a blend of forgiveness and peaceful conflict resolution. Also, these manuscripts are now old and brittle, and can be damaged if moved.
Answer:
During 1200 to 1450, Timbuktu had the largest library in the world and it held hundreds of thousands of books. Their library brought them great wealth and prosperity. However, after Chris Columbus and his Spanish explorers discovered the Americas and eventually started the Columbian Exchange, Africans were greatly disadvantaged. The Europeans captured millions of West Africans and transported them to the Americas as slaves. Timbuktu was located in West Africa. Their library is their biggest token of wealth after all the horror all the enslaved West Africans went through.
Explanation:
In what way did the US government try to promote settlement of the Great Plains
Answer:
The government sold adults 160 acres of land for a small amount of money
Explanation:
Alexander Hamilton's treasury plan proposed to repay Receipts of Congress
at what ratio?
O 200% of the original value
O 150% of the original value
O 75% of the original value
O Face value
Alexander Hamilton's treasury plan proposed to repay the Receipts of Congress at face value.
Alexander Hamilton's treasury plan, put forth during his tenure as the first Secretary of the Treasury of the United States, proposed to repay the Receipts of Congress at their face value. These Receipts, also known as government bonds, were issued by the Congress to raise funds for the young nation. Hamilton recognized the importance of honoring these obligations to maintain the credibility and financial stability of the federal government. By repaying the Receipts at face value, Hamilton aimed to instill confidence in investors and establish a solid foundation for the country's financial system. This approach helped establish the principle of honoring government debts, laying the groundwork for a strong economic future for the United States.In conclusion, Alexander Hamilton's treasury plan advocated for repaying the Receipts of Congress at their face value, highlighting his commitment to maintaining the financial integrity and credibility of the United States government.
For more questions on Alexander Hamilton:
https://brainly.com/question/24714949
#SPJ8
Seafaring pirates and traders from Norway who became the terror of western Europe
in the 8th century were called:
tổng thống thứ 45 của Hoa Kì là ai
Answer:
ghhhh
Explanation:
nybvghhhiujhnbbg gctcych
5. Which statement best summarizes the information on this chart?
The chart summarizes the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, the first constitution of the United States, and the outcomes that resulted from those weaknesses. Option B.
The chart reveals that the central government established by the Articles of Confederation was weak, which led to a number of problems. For example, the government was always short of money because Congress had no power to lay or collect taxes.
This weakness also made it difficult for the government to regulate interstate or foreign trade, which led to economic quarrels among the states and difficulty in arranging trade with other countries. Another weakness was that Congress had no power to enforce its laws, meaning that the government had to rely on the states to enforce them.
Additionally, the requirement for the approval of nine states to enact laws made it difficult for the government to pass legislation, while the requirement for the consent of all thirteen states to amend the Articles made it virtually impossible to change the powers of the government.
The government also lacked an executive branch, which made it difficult to coordinate its work effectively. Finally, the lack of a national court system meant that the central government had no way to settle disputes among the states.
In sum, the chart shows that the central government established by the Articles of Confederation was severely limited and lacked the power necessary to function effectively, which ultimately led to its replacement by the United States Constitution in 1787. So Option B is correct.
For more question on Confederation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28386696
#SPJ11
Note the correct question is
Which statement best summarizes the information on this chart?
A.)The Articles of Confederation gave too much power to the individual state governments.
B.) Most of the Articles of Confederation’s weaknesses related to the central government’s lack of economic power.
C.) The inability of the central government to enact laws was a critical weakness in the Articles of Confederation.
D.) The central government as it was established in the Articles of Confederation could not function effectively.
The chart:
Weakness: Congress had no power to lay or collect taxes.
Outcome: The government was always short of money.
Weakness: Congress had no power to regulate interstate or foreign trade.
Outcome: Economic quarrels among the states broke out. There was difficulty in arranging for trade with othet countries.
Weakness: Congress had no power to enforce its laws.
Outcome: The government depended on the states to enforce the laws.
Weakness: Approval of nine states was needed to enact laws.
Outcome: It was difficult to enact laws.
Weakness: Amendments to the Articles required the consent of all thirteen states.
Outcome: There was no practical way to change the powers of the government.
Weakness: The government had no executive branch.
Outcome: There was no effective way to coordinate the work of the government.
Weakness: There was no national court system.
Outcome: The central government had no way of settling disputes among the states.
Which of the following was a famous barbarian that attacked ancient Rome?
A. Attila the Hun
B. Genghis Khan
C. Mehmed I
D. Timur
Answer:
A. Attila the Hun
Explanation:
i believe the answer is A because he was one of the greatest of the barbarian (Hun) rulers who assailed the Roman Empire, invading the southern Balkan provinces and Greece and then Gaul and Italy.
Answer: the answer is A
Explanation: