Answers
True. The statement "A theory must be rationally correct and must correctly define the events in the real world" is True.
An explanation for this is that a theory, in the context of scientific research and understanding, is required to be logically consistent and accurately represent real-world events. Theories are developed through a process of observation, hypothesis formation, and testing. As new evidence emerges, theories may be modified or refined to better align with the facts. A good theory should not only provide a consistent explanation for a set of observations but also be able to predict future events and outcomes accurately. Theories that do not meet these criteria are either rejected or adjusted until they can fulfill these requirements. Ultimately, a successful theory should provide a coherent and comprehensive understanding of the relevant phenomena and should be supported by a substantial body of empirical evidence.
To know more about the scientific theory visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1578169
#SPJ11
Related Questions
4. What is the leading critique of the electoral college?
Answers
After all, that's how we run every other election in this country, says Jesse Wegman, the author of Let the People Pick the President
The transfer intent doctrine applies where the defendant intends to commit a tort against one person instead (1) commits a different toward against that person commits the same towards as intended but against a difference ________ or (3)committee a different tort against a ______ person. In such cases the intent to commit a tort against a different is transferred to other tort or the injured person for the purpose of establishing a Prima facie case.
Answers
The transfer intent doctrine applies in situations where the defendant intends to commit a tort against one person but instead (1) commits a different tort against that same person, (2) commits the same tort as intended but against a different person, or (3) commits a different tort against a different person. In these cases, the intent to commit a tort against a specific individual is transferred to the actual tort committed or to the injured person, thereby establishing a prima facie case.
The transfer intent doctrine is a legal principle that addresses situations where the defendant's intent to commit a tort is redirected or transferred to a different tort or a different person than originally intended. This doctrine recognizes that the defendant's wrongful intent, although not fulfilled exactly as planned, can still hold legal consequences if a tort is committed against a different person or in a different manner.
There are three scenarios in which the transfer intent doctrine can apply. Firstly, if the defendant intends to commit a specific tort against a particular person but ends up committing a different tort against the same person, the intent is transferred to the actual tort committed. Secondly, if the defendant intends to commit a specific tort against one person but instead commits the same tort against a different person, the intent is again transferred to the new victim. Lastly, if the defendant intends to commit a specific tort against one person but ends up committing a different tort against a different person, the intent is transferred to both the tort committed and the new victim.
The purpose of the transfer intent doctrine is to establish a prima facie case by recognizing that the defendant's wrongful intent, even if not executed precisely as planned, can still hold legal liability. This doctrine ensures that the defendant is held accountable for the harm caused, regardless of the specific target or nature of the tort committed.
To know more about transfer intent click here:
https://brainly.com/question/8960858
#SPJ11
3. Supreme Court Justices Are Umpires
It has become fashionable for Supreme Court nominees and sometimes the Justices themselves to deflect controversy and play down their own importance by suggesting judicial decision-making involves nothing more than the simple application of clear, undisputed rules. Perhaps with Obama's selection … we won't be subjected to the baseball metaphor that Chief Justice John Roberts has used, but however the idea is couched, it's pure bunk. There is no rulebook for constitutional interpretation. In trying to give meaning to inherently elastic constitutional concepts like "equal protection of the laws" and due process, and in interpreting federal statutes that are often less than precise, Supreme Court Justices inevitably make subjective value judgments that are colored by their individual views about right and wrong, fair and unfair, wise and unwise.
In voting against confirming John Roberts, then Senator Obama explained that he was opposing the conservative Roberts because of how he would decide the slim "5%" of cases in which the law really is ambiguous and a Justice's values will inevitably shape his or her views. Our law-professor President got the concept right but the percentage wrong. Cases rarely reach the Supreme Court level when the right answer is clear. Most of the time, the Supreme Court hears cases only after lower federal courts have reached conflicting answers on vexing legal questions.
In short, there is a reason that Justice Harry Blackmun, a man whose grandfathers had fought for the Union in the Civil War and who idolized Abraham Lincoln, opposed the states' rights movement and was a passionate liberal voice on issues of race. There is a reason that Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a pioneer of the fight for women's legal equality, takes an expansive view of the equal-protection clause. There is a reason that Roberts, who came of age as a foot soldier in the Reagan Revolution, has a voting record that matches the old Reagan agenda. And there is a reason that Clarence Thomas, who grew up resenting the racial preferences that took him up the educational ladder to Yale Law School, reads the Constitution as imposing absolute colorblindness on government actors.
Conscientious judges understand that the law is much more than a reflection of their own personal preferences. But in the hard cases, the political cases, the cases tinged with moral judgment, where constitutional language and history provide no single irrefutable answer, a judge's formative experience matters — family, geography, mentors and heroes — they cleave liberal from conservative and ineluctably insinuate themselves into the law.
1. According to the article, what IS the myth? You may/should use the heading as a guide, but also EXPLAIN it.
2. According to the article, why is it a “myth” – in other words, what is the reality?
3. Explain how the author makes the point with one of the examples he uses.
Answers
Answer:
The myth, according to the article, is the idea that Supreme Court Justices are like umpires who simply apply clear, undisputed rules when making decisions.
The reality, according to the article, is that judicial decision-making involves subjective value judgments that are colored by individual views about right and wrong, fair and unfair, wise and unwise. The interpretation of constitutional concepts and federal statutes is inherently elastic and often less than precise, meaning that Justices cannot simply rely on a rulebook.
The author uses the example of Justice Harry Blackmun to make the point that a Justice's formative experiences can shape their views on legal issues. Blackmun's opposition to the states' rights movement and his passion for liberal views on issues of race were influenced by his personal history, including his grandfathers' service in the Civil War and his admiration for Abraham Lincoln. This shows that a Justice's personal background and values can play a role in their legal decisions, despite the myth that Justices are impartial umpires.
Answer:
Explanation:
The myth referred to in the article is the idea that judicial decision-making involves nothing more than the simple application of clear, undisputed rules.
The reality, according to the article, is that judicial decision-making involves subjective value judgments that are colored by the individual views of the judges about right and wrong, fair and unfair, wise and unwise. In trying to interpret inherently elastic constitutional concepts and federal statutes that are often less than precise, judges inevitably make subjective value judgments.
The author uses the example of Justice Harry Blackmun, who opposed the states' rights movement and was a passionate liberal voice on issues of race, to illustrate how a judge's formative experiences shape their views and decisions. The author suggests that Blackmun's family background, geographic location, and heroes and mentors all contributed to his liberal views on race and states' rights. Similarly, the author suggests that the experiences and background of other judges, such as Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Clarence Thomas, have influenced their views on equal protection and colorblindness, respectively. These examples demonstrate how a judge's personal experiences and values can shape their interpretation of the law, even in cases where the law is ambiguous or unclear.
Con la evolución del derecho romano y con la expedición del cerebro edicto de Antonio caracalla, se extinguió la clasificación del hombres libres y esclavos, en pro de fortalecer el imperio, el fisco, ¿esto es falso o verdadero?
Answers
Answer: Verdadero
Explanation:
En el año 338 a.C., el Emperador Caracalla pone fin a la institución de la esclavitud, eliminando la distinción entre hombres libres y esclavos. Este evento no solo aporta una mayor fuerza integradora al creciente imperio, sino que además permite una mayor recaudación de fondos a través de los impuestos que los esclavos liberados deben comenzar a pagar, y que genera un beneficio fiscal para el emperador.
Antes de eso, la esclavitud había sido una institución naturalizada en el Imperio Romano, existiendo personas que nacían como esclavos, y otras que obtenían esa condición por definiciones del derecho positivo de la época.
Threatening to physically harm a person is protected under freedom of speech.
True
False
Answers
Answer: It is False!!
Explanation:
That is the correct answer on pearson
What is the purpose of the Federal Communications Commission? (Site 1)
Answers
Question One:
What conclusions can be drawn about the early New Deal from the attached political cartoons?
List and explain at least four conclusions.
Question 2:
Use Theodore Roosevelt's "New Nationalism" speech and Woodrow Wilson's "What is progress" speech to compare and contrast their respective understanding of Progressivism.
In what ways were their views similar and in what ways were they different? Find and explain two examples for each.
Each answer must be no more than 200 words in length and the total length of what you submit must not exceed 400 words
. A good format is to answer in about 2-3 sentences where the first sentence answers the question, making a claim/argument. The second sentence brings in a specific example from the source material (i.e.a short quote or paraphrase). Then the third sentence explains /analyzes how that example validates your claim and expounds its significance historically.
Any quotations should be brief, and should only come from the document used in the assignment. You need to cite your source with a parenthetical citation by putting the title of the source and pdf page number at the end of the sentence in parentheses ("Bicycle Built for Two," 2). Do not quote the textbook or summarize lecture! That is not the point of the assignment. All work must be your own. Plagiarism will be dealt with sternly. Completion of this assignment requires no additional sources. You must not use Wikipedia or any other Internet source.
This is government
Answers
1. By analyzing these cartoons, we can gain a deeper understanding of the challenges, controversies, and public perception of the early New Deal initiatives.
2. While both speeches reflect a commitment to progressive ideals, they also exhibit notable differences in their understanding and approach to achieving progress.
Question One:
The author of this piece expresses bias toward immigrants in several ways. Firstly, the author characterizes immigrants as "handicapped" and highlights their ignorance of English, implying that they are incapable and inferior. Secondly, the author suggests that immigrants are desperate for work and will accept any job, regardless of its undesirable nature, reinforcing the stereotype of immigrants as desperate and willing to take advantage of. Lastly, the author emphasizes the burden that immigrants place on charitable organizations during times of unemployment, portraying them as a drain on society.
For example, the author states, "The immigrant man finds himself much handicapped when he tries to obtain work..." This quote reflects the bias by portraying immigrants as inherently disadvantaged in their ability to find employment due to their language barrier.
These biases contribute to a negative portrayal of immigrants as incapable and burdensome, perpetuating stereotypes and potentially shaping public opinion against them.
Question Two:
This document provides insights into the world of work in the early twentieth century, particularly for unskilled immigrants. It reveals that a significant portion of available work for immigrants was seasonal and located at a considerable distance from urban centers like Chicago. The work mentioned includes jobs in foundries, stock yards, mines, construction, harvest fields, and camps. These jobs were often short-term, poorly paid, and required the immigrants to constantly move from place to place in search of employment.
For example, the document states, "Much of this work is seasonal and is located at a great distance from the city... A large number of men are needed for a few months or weeks..." This quote highlights the temporary nature of the work and the need for immigrants to constantly relocate.
These insights have implications for understanding the immigrant experience in the United States during that time. Immigrants, particularly those lacking skills or language proficiency, were often relegated to low-paying and precarious jobs, subject to exploitation by contractors and employment agencies. The need for immediate work and limited options forced them into these undesirable positions, perpetuating a cycle of unskilled labor and making it difficult for them to improve their socioeconomic status.
Overall, this document reveals the challenges faced by unskilled immigrants in finding stable employment and sheds light on the exploitative nature of the labor market during the early twentieth century in the United States.
Know more about stereotype here:
https://brainly.com/question/30916993
#SPJ8
The Question was Incomplete, Find the full content below :
Question One: In what ways does the author of this piece, written in 1908, express bias toward immigrants?
Question Two: what specific things can be learned about the world of work in the early twentieth century from this document? What are the implications of these lessons for understanding the immigrant experience in the United States?
Each answer must be no more than 200 words in length and the total length of what hoy submit must not exceed 400 words.
* A good format is to answer in about 2-3 sentences where the first sentence answers the question, making a claim/argument. The second sentence brings in a specific example from the source material ( i.e.a short quote or paraphrase). Then the third sentence explains/analyzes how that example validates your claim and expounds its significance historically.
Any quotations should be brief, and should only come from the document used in the assignment. You need to cite your source with a parenthetical citation by putting the author and page number at the end of the sentence in parentheses(Abbot,481).
Do not quote the textbook or summarize lecture! That is not the point of the assignment.
Completion of this assignment requires no additional sources. You must not use Wikipedia or any other internet source.
1. Who is the plaintiff?
2. What issue did they bring to the court?
3. Who is the defendant?
4. What was their defense?
5. Who won the case?
estate of Melvin w Ballantyne, Deceased.(T.C.M. (CCH)2002-160(2003)
Answers
Answer:
2003) case opinion from the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. ... The Estate of Melvin Ballantyne and the executrix, Jean Ballantyne ... it generated; however, by virtue of the arrangement to pay one-half of ... The court noted that a partner must take into account his "distributive share" for each item of
Explanation:
Edge 2020
A construction contractor brought a breach of contract claim in federal court against a homeowner who had hired the contractor to build an apartment over an existing garage. The action turned on the scope of the work covered by the contract. The contractor and the homeowner were the only witnesses at the bench trial, and they strongly disagreed about the scope of the work. At the end of the trial, the judge stated findings of fact on the record but never issued a written opinion. Neither party objected to the findings. The judge found in favor of the homeowner, and the contractor appealed. Is the appellate court likely to overturn the findings?
Answers
Answer:
No, because the appellate court must give due regard to the trial judge's opportunity to determine witness credibility.
Explanation:
Appellate courts or appeal courts are those that are empowered to review judgements that have been given at trial by lower courts.
Appeal courts exist at the state and federal level and they do not use a jury to review judgements.
In the given instance the construction contractor and home owner did not disagree on the findings of the trial judge and never issued a written opinion.
The appeal court is not likely to overturn the findings because they must give due regard to the trial judge's opportunity to determine witness credibility.
The trial judge should give a written opinion on the matter before the appeal court can delibrate
To supplement (compile) the list of documents for the period 2019-2022. (using information from official websites):
1) Regulatory and legal regulation of project activities in the OIV of the Russian Federation (2019-2022);
2) Methodological recommendations on projects in the Russian Federation (2019-2022);
3) Regional regulatory legal acts and methodological recommendations (Krasnodar Territory)
Answers
Answer:
Here you can find various types of Commission documents such as proposals, impact assessments, communications, delegated and implementing acts and other Commission decisions, agendas and minutes of meetings held by the College of Commissioners.
Explanation:
Hope It Helps
Essential Questions: How do interest groups/lobbyists support the legislative process? Does the role that interest groups play represent what the founder
envisioned for the rights to free speech, assembly & petition or a hi-jacking of the legislative process?
Answers
pass their wanted laws/amendments. lobbyists are hired usually by a businessman/corporation. Interest groups do the same thing but are more for the people. citizens may join them and help advocate for things. Lobbying is protected by the first amendment.
Answer:
assembly & petition
Explanation:
Consider the effects of inflation in an economy composed of only two people: Brian, a bean farmer, and Crystal, a rice farmer. Brian and Crystal both
always consume equal amounts of rice and beans. In 2019 the price of beans was $5, and the price of rice was $3.
Suppose that in 2020 the price of beans was $10 and the price of rice was $6.
Inflation was
Keep the Highest 5/7
Indicate whether Brian and Crystal were better off, worse off, or unaffected by the changes in prices.
Better Off Worse Off Unaffected
O
Brian
Crystal
Now suppose that in 2020 the price of beans was $7.50 and the price of rice was $6.
Answers
The inflation in 2017 existed at 100% and both Charles and Dina exist unaffected.
What is inflation?
In economics, inflation exists as a general accumulation in the prices of goods and services in an economy. When the general price level rises, each unit of money buys fewer goods and services; therefore, inflation corresponds to a decrease in the purchasing power of money.
1. In 2016 the price of beans existed at $1, and the price of rice was $4 but in 2017, the price of beans existed at $2 and the price of rice existed at $8.
This indicates that the market basket has increased from $5 to $10. The inflation will be: = (10 - 5) / 5 × 100 = 100%
Therefore, both of them exist unaffected by the increase in price.
2. If the price of beans existed at $2 and the price of rice was $4.80, then the market basket stands at $6.80. Therefore, the inflation will be:
= (6.80 - 5) / 5 × 100
= 36%
Inflation is 36%. In this case, Charles exists better off because the price of beans contains doubled.
3. The Inflation established on the information provided will be:
= (3.60 - 5) / 5 × 100
= -28%
In this case, Charles stands still better off and there's a fall in inflation by 28%.
4. It should be remarked that the relative price of rice and beans matters additional to Charles and Dina.
To learn more about inflation refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/850547
#SPJ9
The complete question is,
Consider the effects of inflation in an economy composed of only two people: Charles, a bean farmer, and Dina, a rice farmer. Charles and Dina both always consume equal amounts of rice and beans. In 2016 the price of beans was $1, and the price of rice was $4.
1. Suppose that in 2017 the price of beans was $2 and the price of rice was $8.
(a) Inflation= ?%
(b) Indicate whether Charles and Dina were better off, worse off, or unaffected by the changes in prices.
Better Off
Worse Off
Unaffected
Charles
Dina
2. Now suppose that in 2017 the price of beans was $2 and the price of rice was $4.80.
(a) In this case, inflation= ?%
(b) Indicate whether Charles and Dina were better off, worse off, or unaffected by the changes in prices.
Better Off
Worse Off
Unaffected
Charles
Dina
3. Now suppose that in 2017, the price of beans was $2 and the price of rice was $1.60.
(a) In this case, inflation= ?%
(b) Indicate whether Charles and Dina were better off, worse off, or unaffected by the changes in prices.
Better Off
Worse Off
Unaffected
Charles
Dina
4. What matters more to Charles and Dina?
The overall inflation rate
or
The relative price of rice and beans
a manager who first offers an opportunity to disinterested directors or shareholders who turn it down has the right to take advantage of the opportunity herself. true or false
Answers
The answer to this question depends on the specific circumstances and the laws and regulations in the jurisdiction in which the company operates. However, generally speaking, a manager who first offers an opportunity to disinterested directors or shareholders who turn it down may have the right to take advantage of the opportunity herself, but this is not always the case.
In some cases, the manager may be required to disclose the opportunity to the board of directors or the shareholders, and obtain their approval before taking advantage of it. This is especially true if the opportunity could benefit the company or if the manager has a conflict of interest.
Moreover, even if the manager has the right to take advantage of the opportunity herself, she must do so in an ethical and transparent manner, without violating any laws or regulations or jeopardizing the interests of the company or its stakeholders.
In conclusion, a manager's right to take advantage of an opportunity after offering it to disinterested directors or shareholders who turn it down is not absolute, and it depends on the specific circumstances and the applicable laws and regulations. The manager must act in the best interests of the company and its stakeholders and avoid any conflicts of interest or unethical behavior.
To know more about laws visit:
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ11
How did the Voting Rights Act influence the use of gerrymandering quizlet?
Answers
States have interpreted the Voting Rights Act to mean that it's sometimes necessary to draw districts that benefit minorities, like North Carolina's 12th Congressional District.
How has the Voting Rights Act of 1965 impacted redistricting?Redistricting plans that discriminate against voters based on their race, color, or membership in a language minority group are prohibited nationwide under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. The Voting Rights Act (VRA), passed in 1965 at the height of the Civil Rights Movement, prohibits the pervasive and systemic voter discrimination that affects people of color. Recent voter suppression laws, such as those requiring voter identification, purging voter rolls, and making it more difficult to register to vote, have been challenged under the Voting Rights Act. Voting is a process, not just something you do on election day. Additionally, it outlines the procedures and laws that govern who is eligible, how to register, how to vote, when the polls are open, and other matters.
To learn more about Voting Rights Act (VRA) refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/2363092
#SPJ4
in his theory of absolute advantage, adam smith advocated that __________ should determine what a country imports and what it exports.
Answers
In his theory of absolute advantage, Adam smith advocated that the market mechanism should determine what a country imports and what it exports.
The theory of absolute advantage explains the economic concept that is used to refer to a party's superior production capability. The theory can help the countries to maximize their production efficiency and profit, availability of natural resources and geographical stability required for a business can act as a catalyst in the growth of a company. The theory can help in controlling excessive imports and increasing exports of products through mass productivity with minimal effort. The market mechanics, the microstructure, and the dynamics of order book/order flow inside exchanges can further help to study the need and requirement of the market and increasing the production in accordance with the stats.
To know more about "absolute advantage" visit-
brainly.com/question/13221821
#SPJ4
The mostly like outcome of probation is the offenders
Answers
Explanation:
The probationer's failure to abide by the rules and conditions of probation (specified by the judge), resulting in revocation of probation. Type of Termination from Probation: The most likely outcome of probation terms, but there are many kinds of probation failure.
What kinds of reforms would make the bureaucracy more accountable to the public
Answers
Answer:
Bureaucratic reform in the United States was a major issue in the late nineteenth century at the national level and in the early twentieth century at the state level. Proponents denounced the distribution of office by the winners of elections to their supporters as corrupt and inefficient. They demanded nonpartisan scientific methods and credentials be used to select civil servants. The five important civil service reforms were the two Tenure of Office Acts of 1820 and 1867, the Pendleton Act of 1883, the Hatch Acts (1939 and 1940), and the Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA) of 1978.
In 1801, President Thomas Jefferson, alarmed that Federalists dominated the civil service and the army, identified the party affiliation of office holders, and systematically appointed Republicans. President Andrew Jackson in 1829 began the systematic rotation of office holders after four years, replacing them with his own partisans. By the 1830s, the “spoils system” referred to the systematic replacement of office holders every time the government changed party hands.
The Civil Service Reform Act (the Pendleton Act) is an 1883 federal law that established the United States Civil Service Commission. It eventually placed most federal employees on the merit system and marked the end of the so-called “spoils system. ” Drafted during the Chester A. Arthur administration, the Pendleton Act served as a response to President James Garfield’s assassination by a disappointed office seeker.
When a plaintiff in a strict liability lawsuit has used a product in a way that is not intended or that the defendant could not have reasonably foreseen, the defendant may assert which defense?.
Answers
Strict liability is the defense you may assert.
In terms of products responsibility, irrespective of the defendant's intention, a defendant is liable if the plaintiff can demonstrate that the product is faulty.
Regardless of the steps taken to avoid harm, a defendant who participated in an unusually risky sport will be held held responsible any evidence of negligence—for any personal injuries and damages to property brought on by the action.
To succeed in an absolute liability action, you must first sustain harm. Second, you need to demonstrate that the harm was brought on by the defendant's goods or behavior. You can sue for your losses without having to prove fault as long as their actions caused your damages and the situation falls within strict liability laws.
To know more about liability lawsuit, visit the link:
https://brainly.com/question/28173731
#SPJ4
a(n) blank is a statement made in court, under oath, or at some stage in a legal proceeding in which one party against whom charges have been brought admits that an oral contract existed, even though the contract was required to be in writing.
Answers
An admission is a statement made in court, under oath, or at some stage in a legal proceeding in which one party against whom charges have been brought admits that an oral contract existed, even though the contract was required to be in writing.
The federal court docket machine has 3 primary levels: district courts (the trial court), circuit courts which are the primary stage of appeal, and the ideally suited court docket of the USA, the very last degree of attraction within the federal device.
Fundamental differences have to be made among criminal and civil courts, between courts of fashionable jurisdiction and those of confined jurisdiction, and among appellate and trial courts.
Learn more about courts here https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
QUESTION 5
21
In US culture, persons who are born with ambiguous sex characteristics are typically assigned a sex and then
undergo sex reassignment surgery and hormonal therapies.
O True
O False
Answers
What determines the number of seats in the senate? A B C or D?
Answers
Answer:
d
Explanation:
which of the following federal law enforcement agencies employs the largest number of personnel?
Answers
The agency that employs the largest number of personnel among federal law enforcement agencies is the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) employs the largest number of personnel among federal law enforcement agencies. As of 2021, CBP has approximately 60,000 employees, including more than 20,000 Border Patrol agents and over 23,000 CBP officers. CBP is responsible for enforcing immigration and customs laws at the border and ports of entry, as well as protecting the country against terrorism and other threats. Other federal law enforcement agencies, such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), have significantly fewer employees. The FBI has around 35,000 employees, while the DEA has around 10,000.
Learn more about Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA): https://brainly.com/question/31833211
#SPJ11
In general, employers are required to pay state unemployment taxes (A) monthly. (B) during the month following each calendar quarter. (C) annually. (D) none of these.
Answers
Employers are generally required to pay state unemployment taxes during the month following each calendar quarter. Therefore, option B is correct.
Unemployment taxes, also known as unemployment insurance taxes, are levies imposed on employers by federal and state governments to fund unemployment insurance programs. These programs provide financial assistance to eligible workers who have lost their jobs and meet certain criteria.
Employers are required to contribute to these funds through the payment of unemployment taxes based on various factors such as their payroll size, the number of employees, and the industry they operate in.
The amount of taxes owed by employers is determined by a tax rate established by the government, which can vary based on the employer's history of layoffs and the overall stability of the unemployment insurance system.
These taxes are crucial for sustaining unemployment benefits and supporting individuals during periods of job loss or economic downturns.
Learn more about unemployment taxes here:
https://brainly.com/question/2138574
#SPJ4
Help me this question
Answers
Answer: I think it's d
Explanation:
corina believes the lizard ban by the federal aviation administration (faa) is not a law because it is an administrative agency rule. is she correct?
Answers
Yes, Corina is correct that the lizard ban by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is not a law, but rather an administrative agency rule.
Administrative agencies, like the FAA, are given the authority to create rules and regulations by Congress. These rules and regulations have the force of law, but they are not technically laws.
They are created by the agency to help enforce and implement the laws passed by Congress. So, while the lizard ban may be enforceable and have the same effect as a law, it is technically an administrative agency rule.
To know more about Federal Aviation Administration, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30319685#
#SPJ11
Which is the better theory of adjudication: Law as Integrity or
Legal Realism? According to Dworkin & Leiter
Answers
The debate between Law as Integrity (LAI) and Legal Realism (LR) centers on the extent to which courts should use their own interpretation of existing law to resolve legal disputes.
Dworkin and Leiter’s analysis leans towards LAI, stating that a method of adjudication based more on legal precedent than for judges to exercise their own personal discretion should be the norm. They urge judges to strive towards interpretive coherence and emphasize integrity, which allows judges to work with the available evidence as an interconnected web. This in turn makes it easier for future judges to use precedent as a basis for their legal opinions and reduces the chances of contradiction or inconsistency.
On the other hand, LR encourages judges to go beyond the facts and consider the social and political context of the case at hand, allowing them to make decisions based on their own personal values and experience. In conclusion, Dworkin and Leiter opt for LAI in adjudication since this form of reasoning is bound by more solid principles and can maintain consistency and coherency in judicial decision-making.
To know more about Legal Realism , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/33116384
#SPJ4
What are the subcategories for arches, loops, and whorls?
Arches –
Loops –
Whorls -
Answers
Answer:
Bow. It is characterized in that it lacks deltas and its crests run from one side to the other without turning back on themselves.
Internal loop. It is characterized by having a delta to the right of the observer; the papillary crests that form the nucleus are born on the left, run to the right, turning on themselves, to come out on the same side as the starting point.
External clip. It is characterized by having a delta to the observer's left, the papillary ridges that form the nucleus are born on the right and run to the left, turning on themselves, to come out on the same side as the starting point.
Whorl. It is characterized in that it has two deltas, one on the right and one on the left; their nuclei adopt ovoid destrogyrate or synestrogyre spiroidal shapes, concentric ovoid circles concentric in S or in Z.
1
Which statement best describes recent voter trends in the United States?
• A.
People living in the Midwest and the South mostly vote Democratic.
B.
Women since the 1950s mostly vote Republican.
C
People living on the US coasts mostly vote for conservative candidates.
D.
Cuban American families mostly vote Republican.
Answers
The correct answer is option (C) Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican.
Why did Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican?The Constitution was written in 1787, while the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776. There were other occasions when the United States was founded than these. These seven men—George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison—are regarded as the principal Founding Fathers in order of significance.
While many other people also played a part in the establishment of the United States, most people regard these seven to be the Founding Fathers. The Americas were found in 1492, according to Christopher Columbus.
To learn more about vote visit:
https://brainly.in/question/20481185
#SPJ13
__________ allows plaintiffs to seek compensatory and punitive damages when an organization engages in intentional discrimination with malice or reckless indifference.
Answers
Answer:Eeo
Explanation:
Discuss monetary policy in India.
Answers
Answer:
Monetary policy is the process by which the monetary authority of a country, generally the central bank, controls the supply of money in the economy by its control over interest rates in order to maintain price stability and achieve high economic growth.