A state law requires that nail technicians must be licensed prior to providing manicuring services. Jill, has been a state licensed nail technician for several years, but her licensed recently was suspended because she did not pay her licensing registration fee. After her license was suspended Jill performed on a contract to provide manicures to a local beauty pageant. The beauty pageant is refusing to pay Jill. Is a court likely to enforce this contract
Answers
The lawcourt will enforce the contract because there no compelling public interest that would justify the harsh measure.
What is law?It should be noted that law simply means the rules and regulations that are put in place to guide the actions of individuals.
In this case, the court will enforce the contract because there no compelling public interest that would justify the harsh measure.
Learn more about law on:
brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ1
Related Questions
What does a job in a security field require beyond the traditional eight hours of training before assignment
and the 8 - 16 hours on-the-job training?
O 3 years experience
O a college degree
O an Associates degree
O an additional eight hours every year
Answers
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Answer:
I think its an Associates degree
Explanation:
. 'P' was picked up by a gang of robbers in a car from the street. He was given a revolver and asked to shoot at 'M'. When 'P' resisted, a revolver was put on his ear and he was told that if he did not shoot, he would be shot dead. Then 'P' shot 'M' dead. On a charge of murder, 'P' argued that his act was not voluntary nor was there mens rea. 'P' is guilty of: (a) culpable homicide not amounting to murder (b) no offence (c) attempt to commit murder (d) murder 1
please tell
Answers
Answer:
A, culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
I hope this helped at all, sorry if it is incorrect.What type of taxs are included in the the income tax act
Answers
Answer:
Explanation: taxes on what you earn, taxes on what you buy, and taxes on what you own.
Answer:
We get taxes everywhere
Explanation:
Its the taxes on what you earn, taxes on what you buy, and taxes on what you own.
in a court case challenging a law prohibiting people under age 21 from purchasing firearms, who would bear the burden of proof?
Answers
In a court case challenging a law prohibiting people under age 21 from purchasing firearms, the burden of proof would be on the challenger. The burden of proof refers to the responsibility of presenting evidence to prove a case.
The challenger, who is someone who challenges the constitutionality of a law, would be required to provide proof that the law violates the constitution. In this case, the challenger would need to provide proof that the age restriction infringes on a constitutional right, such as the right to bear arms as stated in the Second Amendment. The standard of proof required in this type of case is strict scrutiny.
This means that the law must be shown to be necessary to serve a compelling government interest, and must be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. The court would then weigh the evidence presented by the challenger against the government's interest in regulating firearms, and decide whether the law is constitutional or not.In conclusion, in a court case challenging a law prohibiting people under age 21 from purchasing firearms, the burden of proof would be on the challenger, who would need to provide evidence to prove that the law violates the constitution.
To know more about law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14867447
#SPJ11
4. As of 2018, how many states have a legalized death penalty for capital crimes?
A. 12
B. 30
C. 49
D. 10
Answers
27
Explanation:
in the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty the country at federal level, in 27 States and in American Samoa
A vehicle that is taller Can become more unstable when cornering because it has a higher center of
Answers
Answer:
gravity
Explanation:
The Central Intelligence Agency is responsible for espionage. t/f
Answers
Short Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Operation CHAOS or Operation MHCHAOS was a Central Intelligence Agency domestic espionage project targeting the American people from 1967 to 1974, established by President Lyndon B. Johnson and expanded under President Richard Nixon, whose mission was to uncover possible foreign influence on domestic race, anti-war and other protest movements.
How many amendments in the constitution of the united states.
Answers
Answer:
27
Explanation:
Vermont Stoves Company (VSC) owns special intellectual property it uses to make its "SuperStoves" for sale in the United States. It wants to license its technology to a Mexican-based manufacturer under a standard license agreement, which it has never done before. It wants a fee up-front from the Mexican company and an ongoing 15% royalty on all sales of SuperStoves in Mexico. What are the special concerns of VSC it should seek to deal with in the license terms? What are the special risks VSC should seek to deal with in the license terms?
Answers
Overpreparing for a presentation before speaking publicly rehearsing a better way of asking someone out on a date an exceptional athletic performance during a big game these are all examples of eustress
Answers
Answer: Your welcome!
Explanation:
Eustress is a type of stress that is beneficial and can help motivate people to perform better. In the case of the examples given, the stress of overpreparing for a presentation, rehearsing a better way of asking someone out on a date, and an exceptional athletic performance during a big game are all examples of eustress. This kind of stress can help motivate people to perform better and be more successful in their endeavors, providing a positive outcome.
A temporary invalidation of the driver's license and withdrawment of the driving privilege is known as a
Answers
A "suspension of license" is a temporary invalidation of the driver's license and revocation of the driving privilege. Option A is the correct response in this case.
This is a legal action taken by a government agency, typically the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), in response to a violation of traffic laws or other regulations related to driving.
A suspension can be for a specific period of time, such as 30 days, or it can be indefinite until certain conditions are met, such as payment of fines or completion of a traffic school program. During the suspension period, the driver is not allowed to operate a motor vehicle, and if caught driving, may face further legal consequences.
It is important for drivers to understand the rules and regulations related to their driver's license, and to follow traffic laws and regulations to avoid suspension or other penalties. In some cases, a driver may be able to appeal a suspension or request a restricted license that allows them to drive for specific purposes, such as going to work or school.
To learn more about driver's license
https://brainly.com/question/17729116
#SPJ4
Complete question:
A temporary invalidation of the driver's license and withdrawment of the driving privilege is known as a
A) Suspension of license
B) Revocation of license
C) Renewal of license
D) Issuance of license
what means if you are gagah
Answers
Answer:
gagah means manly but whats the question?
Explanation:
Do you support or oppose the death penalty? Give me couple sentences and why.
Answers
Answer:
Well I do support the death penalty. Even thought it might sound harsh, I still belive in the fair law. Like what they did in the Persian empire, an eye for an eye. If you kill someone, sure you won’t be affected that much but their families won’t see you sitting in a cell for 2-3 life sentences and eventually being set free as a “justice is served” moment. In fact if you killed someone, you would be put to death. It also sets an example for other people to not convict this crime to prevent future murders or whatever violent and unlawful things that could be comed up with.
what the name of party that generally favors more restrictions on what types of guns citizens can own or carry in public places.
Answers
The Democratic Party also advocates for the banning of certain types of firearms such as assault weapons, which it considers to be weapons of war that have no place in civilian hands.
It also supports the regulation of private gun sales, the regulation of gun shows, and the regulation of firearms used in public places such as schools and churches.
The Democratic Party believes that these restrictions on gun ownership are necessary to reduce the number of mass shootings and other gun-related deaths and injuries. The party also believes that these restrictions will help to reduce the amount of gun violence in the country, as well as make it more difficult for criminals to obtain firearms.
In recent years, the Democratic Party has proposed a number of pieces of legislation to further its agenda of stricter gun control. This includes measures such as the “Red Flag” law, which allows law enforcement to take away firearms from individuals who are deemed to be a danger to themselves or others. The party also supports the creation of universal background checks, as well as the closing of loopholes that allow certain individuals to obtain firearms without a background check.
Learn more about Democratic Party at : https://brainly.com/question/6359334
#SPJ4
the term symbolic representation refers to which of the following in the selection of federal judges?
Answers
Symbolic representation in the selection of federal judges refers to the idea of diversifying the judiciary to better reflect the demographics and diversity of the society it serves.
It involves appointing judges who represent different racial, ethnic, gender, or other identity groups to ensure a more inclusive and representative judiciary.
Symbolic representation aims to enhance public confidence in the judicial system and demonstrate that the judiciary is accessible and impartial to all members of society.
By having judges who symbolically represent various groups, it is believed that perspectives, experiences, and values from diverse backgrounds can contribute to more fair and equitable decision-making processes within the judiciary.
For more such questions on Symbolic, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/31926868
#SPJ11
Under the Executive Branch , are designed to sell products and services to people and businesses that want to purchase them, as part of the intention to fund the organization's operating costs through sales rather than taxes.
Answers
The marketing portion of a business plan addresses four main topics: product, price, promotion, and place. A business plan is a blueprint for taking an idea for a product or service and turning it into a commercially viable reality.
What jobs are the executive branch responsible for?
The executive branch carries out and enforces laws. It includes the president, vice president, the Cabinet, executive departments, independent agencies, and other boards, commissions, and committees.
What are the 3 responsibilities of the executive branch?
The executive branch is headed by the president, whose constitutional responsibilities include serving as commander in chief of the armed forces; negotiating treaties; appointing federal judges (including the members of the Supreme Court), ambassadors, and cabinet officials; and acting as head of state.
Learn more about the Executive Branch here: brainly.com/question/15549622
#SPJ2
Which of the following is true about a majority decision reached by the U.S. Supreme Court? a) It is made by a simple majority vote of the nine justices. b) It is made by a two-thirds majority vote of the nine justices. c) It is made by a unanimous vote of the nine justices. d) It is made by a majority vote of the justices who heard the case.
Answers
It is made by a majority vote of the justices. This means that if there are nine justices on the court and all nine hear a case, a majority decision would require at least five justices to agree. Option d is correct.
However, if there is a vacancy on the court and only eight justices hear a case, a majority decision would only require four justices to agree.
He or she may decide to provide an opposing view with additional or different justifications. A judge who concurs in the majority judgement but wishes to convey their own opinions or emphasise a different legal justification for the judgement will write a separate opinion and release it.
Concurring opinions may explain or elaborate on the majority judgement, offer an alternate or supplementary line of reasoning, or draw attention to significant legal or policy concerns. By presenting fresh viewpoints or legal strategies, they can also affect how the law is interpreted in the future. The capacity of individual justices to express their own thoughts and justifications through concurring opinions is crucial because it can assist advance legal accountability, diversity, and openness.
Learn more about Concurring opinions here
https://brainly.com/question/6037491
#SPJ11
In cases where informed decision makers such as trained medical staff or governmental officials agree that a research study has the potential to benefit a large number of people, written informed consent from participants is not needed.
Answers
The correct answer is False. Written informed permission from participants is not necessary when knowledgeable decision makers, such as skilled medical personnel or government authorities, concur that a research project has the potential to be helpful to many people.
A fundamental tenet of research ethics is informed consent. Its goal is to ensure that human participants can enter research freely (voluntarily), that they are fully informed of what it means to participate, and that they provide consent before entering the study.
Respect for people demands that subjects be given the option to decide what will or won't happen to them, to the extent that they are capable. When appropriate criteria for informed consent are met, this option is granted.
Read more about decision makers at
https://brainly.com/question/29035403
#SPJ4
direct co-ownership implies that each co-owner holds a titled interest in the property but without exclusive possession with respect to the other co-owners. which of the following is a mix fee simple ownership and co-ownership at the same time?
Answers
The type of power that mixes fee simple ownership and co-ownership at the same time is a Tenancy in Common. Under a residency in common, each proprietor holds an individual and disunited interest in the property.
It means that each owner has a separate and identifiable share of the property. unlike the direct title, each owner has the right to retain and use the entire property, subject to the rights of the other co-owners. Each owner can vend or transfer their share of the property without the concurrence of the other co-owner.
There share will pass to their heirs at law or designated heirs upon their death or any mishappening.
To learn more about Tenancy in Common:
https://brainly.com/question/28188381
#SPJ4
Which event was instrumental in making the process of ratifying the Constitution a success?

Answers
Option 2: North Carolina and Rhode island initially refused to ratify the Constitution a success.
North Carolina and Rhode Island initially refused to ratify the Constitution as a success.
What is a Constitution?The legal foundation of a nation, organization, or another form of institution, a constitution is a collection of fundamental principles or recognized precedents that generally specify how that body is to be governed.
The constitution was prepared by the Constituent Assembly, which existed elected by elected members of the provincial assemblies
To know more about the constitution refer to :
https://brainly.com/question/17717115
#SPJ2
What was the Miranda v Arizona case about and why was it so controversial and important?
Answers
In Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), the U.S. Supreme Court handed down an important decision, holding that the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution .
Its prohibits prosecutors from using a person's answers to questions while they are in custody as evidence at their trial unless they can show that the person was informed of their right to counsel both before and during questioning as well as of their right not to be forced to testify against them. Miranda was viewed by many as a significant change in American criminal law because the Fifth Amendment was previously only thought to protect people from formal forms of coercion to confess, such as torture. The U.S. Supreme Court made a significant ruling in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), declaring that the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution applies.
Learn more about Miranda v Arizona:
https://brainly.com/question/22313119
#SPJ4
in the civil system, the term litigation refers to
Answers
In the civil system, the term litigation refers to pretrial and trial. The term "litigation" describes bringing or defending a legal claim.
The state has the right to make sure that its interests are effectively represented in conflicts involving governmental actions or goals. A "dispute" in this context refers to a particular legal disagreement between the parties decided by a judge. Civil conflicts and administrative disputes are the two different categories of disagreements.
Litigation cases are the individual cases connected to these disagreements, and litigation work is the job connected to managing them. Civil disputes are cases based on private causes of action like the Civil Code and State Redress Act that are heard in accordance with the processes outlined in the Code of Civil Procedure.
Learn more about litigation here:
https://brainly.com/question/15284945
#SPJ4
Your question seems to be incomplete but most probably the complete question was:
In the civil system, the term litigation refers to:
Pre-trial and trial
Trial and error
Justice and trial.
If the President does not like a law that is passed by Congress, the President can veto the law. This is an example of: Group of answer choices The checks and balances built into the United States system of government. The authoritarian power of the President to prevent any statute the President does not like from becoming law. The principle of federalism. The legal issue discussed in the Supreme Court case of *Marbury v. Madison*
Answers
The President's ability to veto a law passed by Congress represents the checks and balances in the United States government system.
The President's power to veto a law passed by Congress is a fundamental aspect of the checks and balances system in the United States government.
This system ensures that no single branch of government becomes too powerful and allows for a separation of powers. If the President disagrees with a law passed by Congress, they have the authority to veto it, preventing it from becoming law.
This serves as a safeguard against potential abuses of power and ensures that decisions are subject to scrutiny and deliberation. The principle of checks and balances is an essential component of the United States government's structure.
As it helps maintain a system of accountability and prevents any one branch from dominating the others. Therefore, the President's veto power reflects the checks and balances built into the United States system of government.
To learn more about the president -
brainly.com/question/19520900
#SPJ11
The President's ability to veto a law passed by Congress represents the checks and balances in the United States government system.
The President's power to veto a law passed by Congress is a fundamental aspect of the checks and balances system in the United States government.
This system ensures that no single branch of government becomes too powerful and allows for a separation of powers. If the President disagrees with a law passed by Congress, they have the authority to veto it, preventing it from becoming law.
This serves as a safeguard against potential abuses of power and ensures that decisions are subject to scrutiny and deliberation. The principle of checks and balances is an essential component of the United States government's structure.
As it helps maintain a system of accountability and prevents any one branch from dominating the others. Therefore, the President's veto power reflects the checks and balances built into the United States system of government.
To learn more about the president -
brainly.com/question/19520900
#SPJ11
How does the court decide what the
law is?
Answers
A police officer may operate an authorized emergency vehicle for a law enforcement purpose without using the audible or visual signals required by Section 546.003 if the officer is:
(1) responding to an emergency call or pursuing a suspected violator of the law with probable cause to believe that:
(A) knowledge of the presence of the officer will cause the suspect to:
(i) destroy or lose ___________ of a suspected felony;
(ii) end a suspected continuing felony before the officer has obtained sufficient evidence to establish grounds for arrest; or
(iii) ____________ apprehension or identification of the suspect or the suspect's vehicle;
Answers
(1) responding to an emergency call or pursuing a suspected violator of the law with probable cause to believe that:
(A) knowledge of the presence of the officer will cause the suspect to:
(i) destroy or lose evidence of a suspected felony;
(ii) end a suspected continuing felony before the officer has obtained sufficient evidence to establish grounds for arrest; or
(iii) hinder apprehension or identification of the suspect or the suspect's vehicle.
Clair DeLoon was one of five current roommates in a house where tenants are continually moving in and moving out. An unknown past tenant vacated the premises, leaving behind a VCR and a collection of campy video tapes, frequently enjoyed by later groups of select tenants. When it came time for Clair to move on to more a more luxurious living space, she took the VCR and tape collection with her. One of the remaining tenants has filed a complaint with the police on the grounds that the items did not belong to Clair. Clair is being charged with theft.
a. Locate and correctly cite relevant secondary authority
b. Provide your exact search query
c. State the legal issue/s involved after studying the information
d. Discuss the arguments supporting Clair’s conviction, as well as arguments that can be raised in her defense.
e. Correctly cite one case supporting each of the arguments provided above.
Answers
a police officer learned from a reliable informant that a major drug deal was about to take place at a local restaurant. the officer obtained a search warrant for the restaurant and arrived with other uniformed officers to search the premises. while conducting the search, the officer searched several of the customers. while searching one of the restaurant's regular customers, the officer felt an object in the customer's pocket and pulled out a container filled with heroin. the customer was arrested and later convicted of possession of heroin. a state statute permits officers executing a search warrant to search persons on the premises if the officers reasonably expect danger to themselves or a risk of disposal or concealment of anything described in the warrant. if the customer challenges his conviction on the ground that his fourth amendment rights were violated, will he be successful?
Answers
Answer:
a police officer learned from a reliable informant that a major drug deal was about to take pla
Explanation:
51Q. A serious crime in the club, including robbery, assault and battery, etc. is considered what level alert in the Crisis Communications protocol?
Answers
In the Crisis Communications protocol, a serious crime in a club, such as robbery, assault and battery, etc. would be considered a high-level alert.
This type of situation poses a significant threat to the safety and well-being of club patrons, staff, and possibly even the surrounding community.
In such cases, it is important for the club management to act quickly and efficiently to ensure the safety of everyone involved.
The Crisis Communications protocol would likely involve alerting law enforcement and emergency services as quickly as possible, and taking steps to evacuate the premises if necessary.
Additionally, the club management would need to be prepared to communicate with patrons, staff, and the media about the situation in a clear and timely manner.
This might involve issuing public statements or updates on social media, and providing information about any steps being taken to address the situation and ensure the safety of everyone involved.
Overall, a serious crime in a club would be considered a high-level alert in the Crisis Communications protocol, requiring swift and effective action to ensure the safety and well-being of everyone involved.
For more question on "Serious Crime" :
https://brainly.com/question/31547106
#SPJ11
How does the uniform commercial code differ from the common law of contracts?
Answers
Answer: Common law governs contractual transactions with real estate, services, insurance, intangible assets and employment. UCC governs contractual transaction with goods and tangible objects (such as a purchase of a car).
Explanation:
Answer:
Common law governs contractual transactions with real estate, services, insurance, intangible assets and employment.
Explanation:
implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose