Answers
The provision of the Constitution that mandates that each state respect and enforce both the judgments awarded by courts in other states and the statutes and case law of other states is known as the Full Faith and Credit Clause.
The Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution mandates that each state respect and enforce the judgments awarded by courts in other states and the statutes and case law of other states. The provision is included in Article IV, Section 1 of the Constitution, and it guarantees that citizens' rights and obligations will be protected when they travel or relocate from one state to another.
Learn more about Full Faith and Credit Clause https://brainly.com/question/14848371
#SPJ11
Related Questions
Suppose you are reading descriptions of job openings and notice one that says the individual must be able to analyze an organization and implement measures for improvement. What job description are you probably reading? abuse and social services manager social, community, and emergency manager disaster and emergency services manager child protective services manager
Answers
Answer:
What methods would you use to collect job analysis data? 2. You work in the human resource department of a large brewery in Atlantic Canada. You are in the process of writing job descriptions for all managerial and supervisory staff. One manager who is in the production division of the brewery refuses to complete a job analysis questionnaire.
Explanation:
The individual must be able to analyze an organization and implement measures for improvement is a description of an abuse and social services manager. Option A. This is further explained below.
What are social services?Generally, Social services are simply defined as services provided to groups that aid in the development of individuals.
In conclusion, A description of abuse and social services manager includes the ability to examine an organization and adopt strategies for improvement.
Read more about social services
https://brainly.com/question/15059623
#SPJ2
A Texas law which requires that motorcycle riders wear helmets is most accurately described as... Group of answer choices inter lego. mala in se. quid pro quo. mala prohibita. novus ordo seclorum.
Answers
Answer: mala prohibita
Explanation:
Malum in se is simply a Latin phrase that means that something wrong or evil. Examples include murder, assault, robbery etc. These act are wrongful.
Malum prohibitum, simply m and that something that's considered to be wrong because it's prohibited. Examples include indecent exposure, not using helmets by bikers etc.
James Lyne discusses the landscape of current cybercrime. What are some ways you can prevent becoming a victim of a cybercrime? How can simple cybercrimes such as these grow into cyberterrorism or international organized crime? Will cybercrime increase at a rate that threatens all internet activity, mobile apps, and all business; or, will nations and organizations be successful in limiting and or eliminating cybercrime threats?
Answers
We must discard unsolicited email communications without opening them in order to stop cybercrime. Scam emails should also be avoided since they can harm machines that aren't secured. a strong password that is unique.
Your gadgets are safeguarded against cybercrime by such passwords. When making new passwords, you should always utilize upper- and lowercase letters, digits, and special characters.
The first line of protection in a cyber attack is a firewall. It prevents access to numerous viruses and hackers as well as links to shady or unauthorized websites. Use malware and anti-virus software.
Any unlawful behavior involving a computer, networked device, or network is considered a cybercrime. While the majority of cybercrimes are committed to making money for the perpetrators, others are committed against specific systems or devices in order to harm or disable them.
To learn more about cybercrime
https://brainly.com/question/14837324
#SPJ1
Which list shows events from the water cycle in the correct order?
Answers
Condensation
Precipitation
Collection
Based on your reading of the following, choose the best answer.
ISIL is a terrorist group that first emerged in 1999. Initially referred to as al-Qaeda in Iraq, the group subsequently was called the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). The president has insisted on the name ISIL, or the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. This name also is closer to the name the group gives themselves in Arabic. The Levant traditionally referred to "Great Syria," which included the countries of Syria, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Israel, and parts of Turkey. ISIL is responsible for the public beheadings of civilians as well as other terrorist acts.
Why does the president think it’s important to call this group ISIL?
to highlight ISIL’s goal is to establish an Islamic state in a region containing established countries
to adhere to diplomatic protocol by using a more accurate name for the terrorist group
to show ISIL that he understands what its name means in Arabic
to distinguish between Iraq, originally called Mesopotamia, and the rest of the countries in the region
Answers
Answer:
am not sure but I can say you all the best....
all of these are push or pull factors that have driven people to migrate from middle america to the united states except:
an increasingly open and demilitarized U.S. border
Answers
The correct answer is: an increasingly open and demilitarized U.S. border.
Push factors are those that compel people to leave their home country, while pull factors are those that attract people to a new country. In the case of migration from Middle America to the United States, there are several push and pull factors at play. However, an increasingly open and demilitarized U.S. border is not one of them. In fact, the U.S. border has become increasingly militarized and difficult to cross in recent years.
Some of the push factors that have driven people to migrate from Middle America to the United States include:
- Economic hardship and lack of job opportunities in their home countries
- Violence and insecurity, often related to drug trafficking and gang activity
- Political instability and repression
Some of the pull factors that have attracted people to the United States include:
- Better job opportunities and higher wages
- The presence of family members or social networks in the United States
- The perception of greater safety and stability
To know more about demilitarized:
https://brainly.com/question/30551527
#SPJ11
a(n) blank is a statement made in court, under oath, or at some stage in a legal proceeding in which one party against whom charges have been brought admits that an oral contract existed, even though the contract was required to be in writing.
Answers
An admission is a statement made in court, under oath, or at some stage in a legal proceeding in which one party against whom charges have been brought admits that an oral contract existed, even though the contract was required to be in writing.
The federal court docket machine has 3 primary levels: district courts (the trial court), circuit courts which are the primary stage of appeal, and the ideally suited court docket of the USA, the very last degree of attraction within the federal device.
Fundamental differences have to be made among criminal and civil courts, between courts of fashionable jurisdiction and those of confined jurisdiction, and among appellate and trial courts.
Learn more about courts here https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
What the best definition of "politics ?
Answers
ANSWER:
the activities associated with the governance of a country or other area, especially the debate or conflict among individuals or parties having or hoping to achieve power.
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Answers
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
4. What happens when a person or government attempts to deprive someone of something that is necessary to human dignity?
Answers
Depriving someone of their fundamental right, translates to robbery and hence going against the Law. Hence, such person has violated the Law and should be tried.
The Rule of Fundamental human right is a very huge and respected law pertaining to individuals living in a democratic country. This means that, the right of other must not be trampled upon, either by other individuals or the government.Therefore, anyone who goes against these law has trespassed and could be face trial.
Learn more : https://brainly.com/question/24087938
Janisha is a widow who has one adult daughter, Risa, and an adult nephew, Marc. Janisha intends for all of her property to go to Risa and Marc. Risa is an accountant and is financially responsible. Marc is financially irresponsible and prone to impulsive buying. Janisha owns her home, worth approximately $700,000, has savings and other assets worth about $900,000, and also owns various items of personal property. Janisha has decided to create a living revocable trust
Answers
Janisha here is prompting a living revocable agreement where the grantor has the right to retain their ownership or revoke the trust during their lifetime.
A living revocable is a formal agreement that enables the grantor to contribute assets to the trust while still alive. During their lifetime, the grantor retains ownership of the assets and has the right to modify or revoke the trust at any time in between the course of agreement`.
In Janisha's situation, setting up a living revocable trust might be a wise move to make sure that her assets are distributed in the manner she desires after her passing. Janisha on the other hand can make sure that her assets are managed and distributed in accordance with her wishes in a regularized manner, even if she becomes incapacitated or passes away, by putting them into a trust.
Learn more about agreement at:
brainly.com/question/27962135
#SPJ4
The validity of a piece of evidence is called:
implicit bias
O liability
objectivity
directness
admissibility
O
reliability
Answers
How does a prosecutor decide whether or not to file charges?
Answers
Answer:
la suficienta de probe
Explanation:
Briefly discuss China’s separatist challenges in both Tibet and Xinjiang. How might
China’s experiences with Hong Kong and Taiwan have influenced its policies toward
these two regions?
Answers
There is animosity toward the convergence and assimilation of Hong Kong and the Chinese mainland as well as the growing meddling in Hong Kong's internal affairs by the Chinese government and its ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Why is Xinjiang is important for China?China's Belt and Road Initiative, a significant economic programme spanning Asia and Europe, includes Xinjiang as a key component.
Beijing wants to continue developing Xinjiang, which is home to China's greatest coal and natural gas reserves, and wants to do so by eliminating any chance of separatist action.
Ever since the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) came to power in 1949, Xinjiang has been a part of China. There are Uyghurs who advocate for independence from China and refer to the area as East Turkestan.
Therefore, there is animosity toward the convergence and assimilation of Hong Kong and the Chinese mainland as well as the growing meddling in Hong Kong's internal affairs by the Chinese government and its ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
To know more about the Xinjiang aspect of China, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/7178318
#SPJ1
Which of the following do critics argue are the effects of Texas part-time legislature's biennial 140-day session?
-A biennial session was better suited to Texas's agricultural past, not to its urbanized present.
-The short sessions prevent the legislature from responding in a timely fashion to breaking issues.
-The low pay for legislators means they must keep outside jobs while in office.
Answers
Critics argue that the effects of Texas's part-time legislature's biennial 140-day session include being better suited to Texas's agricultural past, not its urbanized present and the short sessions prevent timely responses to breaking issues.
Critics argue that Texas's biennial 140-day legislative session, which was originally designed for an agricultural society, is not suitable for the modern urbanized state. They contend that the limited session length hinders the legislature's ability to respond promptly to emerging and time-sensitive issues.
Additionally, critics highlight the low pay for legislators, which necessitates them to maintain outside jobs, potentially diverting attention from their legislative duties.
These arguments point to concerns about the effectiveness and responsiveness of Texas's part-time legislature in addressing the needs of a rapidly changing state.
For more questions like Critics argue click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/29869400
#SPJ11
Which statement correctly describes Arizona’s legislative branch? Check all that apply.
Answers
Statements that correctly describe Arizona’s legislative branch are:
(B) The Senate consists of 30 senators.
(D) Any member may introduce legislation.
(E) Reps are chosen by the people of Arizona.
What is Arizona’s legislative branch?There are 60 members of the House of Representatives and 30 members of the Senate in the bicameral Arizona State Legislature.
Two House representatives and one senator represent each district.
The House of Representatives and the Senate are two distinct chambers or bodies that makeup Arizona's legislature, which is bicameral like all other States save Nebraska.
The Senate has 30 members, one from each district, and the House has 60 members, two from each Arizona Legislative District.
There are 30 senators in the Senate.
Legislation can be introduced by any member.
Arizonans vote for representatives.
Therefore, statements that correctly describe Arizona’s legislative branch are:
(B) The Senate consists of 30 senators.
(D) Any member may introduce legislation.
(E) Reps are chosen by the people of Arizona.
Know more about Arizona’s legislative branch here:
https://brainly.com/question/10906824
#SPJ1
Complete question:
Which statements correctly describe Arizona’s legislative branch? Check all that apply.
a. The House is made up of 30 members.
b. The Senate is made up of 30 members.
c. The House has 16 standing committees.
d. All members can introduce legislation.
e. Members are elected by Arizona’s citizens.
where does social change advocacy begin and where does it end, related to legislative policy?
Answers
Social change advocacy begins with recognizing the need for change and ends with the enactment of legislative policy that brings about the desired change.
The process of social change advocacy includes several steps, such as identifying the issue, raising awareness, building coalitions, mobilizing supporters, engaging in direct action and lobbying policymakers to enact legislation that will bring about the desired change.
It is important to note that social change advocacy is an ongoing process that requires sustained effort and commitment from advocates and supporters.
Advocacy can take many different forms, including grassroots organizing, lobbying, and public education campaigns. Grassroots organizing involves building coalitions of supporters who work together to advocate for change at the local, state, or national level.
Lobbying involves engaging policymakers directly to promote legislative policy changes that will bring about the desired change. Public education campaigns involve raising awareness about the issue and mobilizing support for the cause through social media, traditional media, and other communication channels.
In conclusion, social change advocacy begins with recognizing the need for change and ends with the enactment of legislative policy that brings about the desired change. Advocacy can take many different forms, including grassroots organizing, lobbying, and public education campaigns.
It is an ongoing process that requires sustained effort and commitment from advocates and supporters.
To know more about Social change advocacy, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32796589#
#SPJ11
Which of the following is NOT a type of crime pattern analysis? *
Crime and incident series identification
General profile analysis
Victim identification
Hot spot identification
Answers
Hope this helps
in the landmark case, hadley v. baxendale, what could the hadleys have done differently to be entitled to collect consequential damages (i.e., lost profits) from baxendale?
Answers
The correct answer is option A - Informed Baxendale of the "special circumstances" surrounding the contract (the fact that the Hadleys did not have an extra crankshaft). Hadleys might have informed Baxendale about the "special circumstances" surrounding the contract (the lack of an extra crankshaft) in the illustrious case of Hadley v. Baxendale in order to be qualified to receive damages (i.e., lost profits) from Baxendale. In the event of a breach of contract, the rule for calculating consequential damages was established by the Hadley v. Baxendale case, an English ruling.
- More about the landmark case :
- According to the Hadley case, the party who breached shall be held accountable for all reasonably foreseeable losses. In other words, a party who breaches a contract cannot be held accountable for losses that were not anticipated at the time the deal was signed.
- A breaching party shall be responsible for both damages that naturally result from the breach and those that the parties reasonably anticipated at the time the contract was signed.
- The importance of the Hadley v. Baxendale case : It establishes the guiding principle for calculating consequential damages resulting from a breach of contract: a breaching party is liable for all losses that the contracting parties should have anticipated, but is exempt from liability for any losses that he could not have anticipated given the information at his disposal.
To know more about landmark case, kindly click on the link below :
https://brainly.com/question/1305609?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
- The complete question is :
In the landmark case, Hadley v. Baxendale, what could the Hadleys have done differently to be entitled to collect consequential damages (i.e., lost profits) from Baxendale?
a. Informed Baxendale of the "special circumstances" surrounding the contract (the fact that the Hadleys did not have an extra crankshaft).
b. Not paid Baxendale prior to his completion of the contract.
c. Found a replacement carrier once it became evident that Baxendale would not perform on time and sue Baxendale for any additional amount owed to the replacement carrier.
d. Moved to America.
New York Times vs the United States
Answers
Answer and Explanation:
1. The court's decision was that the press has the complete right to expose information from any government sector, including information related to the executive sector, even if that information were related and were in the possession of the president of the republic.
2. I agree with the court's decision, since government information must be exposed to the people who are the center of national politics. This prevents important information from being hidden from the public and that possible cases of corruption from proceeding and cannot be judged by popular opinion.
3. This case is important today because it guarantees the rights defended by the first amendment, ensuring that the press cannot be limited by the government and promoting the free exercise of information.
Do you think it is possible to find a balance between justice and the implementation of Ubuntu and it’s inherent ideas rehabilitative justice
Answers
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Ubuntu is the long tradition of african cultures where criminals or people that have done something wrong have to do right by the people they injured or hurt, and they have to help them healing the social tissue and restoring relationships in order to be able to go back into society.
It's a very close matter to rehabilitative justice, in the sense of wanting to restore the social tissue and helping the person get back to society as a good, productive and healthy member of the society, Ubuntu has proven to be a good method and state of mind when dealing with hurt societies by the narcotrafic and organized crime.
Explain how Congress could have addressed the increasing cost of insulin prior to 2017.
Answers
Prior to 2017, Congress has complete authority to enact legislation that covers both biologics and certain chemically created goods, such as insulin. The cost of insulin would have been lower if this legislation and the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act had been approved together in 2009.
What is Congress?Generally, The legislative body of the federal government of the United States of America is known as the United States Congress. It is bicameral, meaning that it is made up of two chambers: the House of Representatives, which is the lower body, and the Senate, which is the upper body. It has its meetings at the Capitol Building in Washington, District of Columbia.
Before 2017, Congress has all of the authority necessary to enact a statute that will not only encompass the chemically created items but also certain chemically produced biologics, such as insulin.
If this legislation and the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act had been approved in 2009 together, the cost of insulin may have been brought down to a more reasonable level.
Read more about Congress
https://brainly.com/question/4736734
#SPJ1
In general, in deciding whether to strike down a punitive damage award as unconstitutional, the court will look at all of the following except the: _______.
Multiple choice question.
difference between the punitive damages awarded by the jury and the civil penalties authorized or imposed in comparable cases
disparity between the actual or potential harm suffered by the plaintiff and the punitive damage award
degree of reprehensibility of the defendant's misconduct
difference between the amount of nominal damages and the amount of compensatory damages awarded at the trial court level
Answers
Answer: The purpose of punitive damages is to punish the wrongdoer and deter others from similar wrongdoing.
Explanation:
When considering whether a punitive damage award is excessive, the court will consider several factors including the degree of misconduct, the harm suffered by the plaintiff, and the difference between the punitive damages and civil penalties.
In general, in deciding whether to strike down a punitive damage award as unconstitutional, the court will look at all of the following except the difference between the amount of nominal damages and the amount of compensatory damages awarded at the trial court level.
The other factors that the court will consider include the degree of reprehensibility of the defendant's misconduct, the disparity between the actual or potential harm suffered by the plaintiff and the punitive damage award, and the difference between the punitive damages awarded by the jury and the civil penalties authorized or imposed in comparable cases.
Punitive damages are damages that are awarded to punish a defendant for their misconduct or to deter others from engaging in similar conduct. However, excessive punitive damage awards can be unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
When determining whether a punitive damage award is excessive, the court will consider the factors mentioned above. The nominal damages are not relevant to this analysis as they are a symbolic amount awarded to recognize a legal injury without requiring any compensation.
Visit here to learn more about Plaintiff:
brainly.com/question/30552468
#SPJ11
Douglas Massey and Nancy Denton documented which of the following patterns in U.S. inner cities?
a. hypersegregation
b. the absence of racial segregation
c. de jure segregation
d. declining segregation
Answers
Douglas Massey and Nancy Denton documented the hypersegregation which is patterns in U.S. inner cities. The Option A.
What pattern did they document in U.S. inner cities?In work called "American Apartheid," both of them documented the pattern of hypersegregation in U.S. inner cities in which they defined hypersegregation as level of segregation that goes beyond what can be explained by demographic factors such as income, education, and preferences.
It is characterized by high levels of racial and ethnic segregation ad social and economic isolation which can lead to a range of negative outcomes for marginalized communities which includes limited access to jobs, education, healthcare and political representation.
Read more about hypersegregation
brainly.com/question/30461271
#SPJ1
Help me this question
Answers
Answer: I think it's d
Explanation:
A libel action in which the state acts on behalf of the injured party in bringing criminal charges against the defendant is called .
Answers
A libel action in which the state acts on behalf of the injured party in bringing criminal charges against the defendant is called a criminal defamation case.
Criminal defamation refers to the prosecution of individuals for making false and damaging statements about others that harm their reputation. Unlike civil defamation cases, which are typically brought by the injured party seeking compensation, criminal defamation cases involve the state initiating legal proceedings against the defendant.
The rationale behind criminal defamation laws varies across jurisdictions. Some argue that criminalizing defamation is necessary to protect the reputation of individuals and society at large, as false and harmful statements can have far-reaching consequences. Others, however, criticize criminal defamation laws as being prone to abuse and as potential threats to freedom of speech.
In criminal defamation cases, the burden of proof is usually on the prosecution to demonstrate that the defendant made false statements with the intention to harm the reputation of the plaintiff. The level of proof required varies depending on the jurisdiction, but it is generally higher than in civil defamation cases.
know more about defendant here:
https://brainly.com/question/31753281
#SPJ11
As a future student, why we need so study special crime investigation?
Answers
How are medical emergencies that occur at the jail handled by Sheriff Diamond's deputies and in many
other jails across the country?
The jail maintains a full staff of doctors and nurses and has a small emergency room.
The jail does not treat prisoners who become ill in jail; they are simply moved to an isolation cell until they improve.
The jail staff will place the ill prisoner in an available deputy's vehicle and drive him or her to the nearest emergency room.
The jail has nurses on duty who are able to perform an initial evaluation of a prisoner's health and provide basic first aid, while
summoning EMTS for emergency transport to the hospital.
Answers
The medical emergencies that occur at jail handled by Sheriff Diamond deputies and in other country jails --The jail has nurses on duty who are able to perform an initial evaluation of a prisoner's health.
The nurses provide basic first aid, while summoning EMTS for emergency transport to the hospital.
Option D is correct .
What counts as a medical emergency?Sudden injury from a motor vehicle accident, burns or smoke inhalation, drowning, deep or gross wounds, or other injuries. Sudden, severe pain anywhere in the body. Sudden dizziness, weakness or blurred vision. Ingestion of toxic substances. A medical emergency is an acute injury or illness that poses an immediate threat to a person's life or long-term health and is sometimes referred to as "life or limb threatening."
Learn more about medical emergencies :
brainly.com/question/1381162
#SPJ1
A benefit that is sought buy an interest group that once achieved cannot be denied to nonmembers is called aA free riderB solidary benefitC collective goodD purposive benefit
Answers
A benefit sought by an interest group that, once attained, cannot be denied to nonmembers is referred to as a collective good.
A collective good represents a valuable outcome that an interest group aims to achieve, such as policy changes, public goods, or societal improvements. Unlike private goods that can be selectively distributed or denied based on membership or contribution, collective goods are non-excludable.
Once the group successfully obtains the desired benefit, it becomes accessible to everyone, including nonmembers and free riders. This poses a dilemma for interest groups, as individuals may be tempted to reap the benefits without investing their resources or efforts.
For more information on collective good visit: brainly.com/question/15604402
#SPJ11
What can be derived from a firearm and its projectiles?
Answers
Firearms and their projectiles can provide valuable information to law enforcement officials, forensic scientists, and criminal investigators.
What constitutes firearms and their projectiles?A firearm is a type of weapon that uses gunpowder or other explosive materials to launch a projectile through a barrel. The projectile is the actual bullet that is propelled out of the gun when it is fired. There are several things that can be derived from both the firearm and its projectiles:
Forensic evidence: Firearms and their projectiles can leave behind valuable forensic evidence at a crime scene. This evidence can be used to identify the type of gun used, the direction from which the shot was fired, and the trajectory of the bullet.
Ballistics: The study of the behavior of bullets and projectiles is known as ballistics. Ballistics can be used to determine the velocity, trajectory, and impact of a bullet, as well as the damage it can cause.
Weapon identification: Firearms and their projectiles can be used to identify the type of weapon used in a crime. This can help law enforcement officials to track down the perpetrator.
Ammunition analysis: Analysis of the ammunition used in a firearm can provide clues about the person who fired the gun. For example, the type of ammunition used can indicate the level of skill or training of the shooter.
Criminal investigations: Firearms and their projectiles can be an important piece of evidence in criminal investigations. They can be used to link suspects to crimes, provide evidence of motive, and help to build a case against a defendant in court.
Overall, firearms and their projectiles can provide valuable information to law enforcement officials, forensic scientists, and criminal investigators.
learn more about firearms and their projectiles: https://brainly.com/question/31180996
#SPJ1