The philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau believed that society has a corrupting influence on a people and that it was the government's responsibility to protect the people from the ills of society by making laws that benefit the general population. Do you agree with Rousseau? Why or why not? Explain.
Cars are only as safe as their driver, so _____ is your best bet to lower your risk.
According to the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, the person who _____ a libel is subject to the same liability as the one who published it originally.
According to the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, the person who republishes a libel is subject to the same liability as the one who published it originally.
In Alabama, anyone who republishes a libel is subject to the same liability as the one who originally published it. This includes any person or entity who re-broadcasts an unlawful statement, reprints it in a book, continues to host it on a website, or speaks it out loud. The person or entity who originally published a libelous statement is typically held liable first, but if the libel is republished by another party, that person or entity may also be held accountable.
Furthermore, even if the party who republished the libel did not know it was false or did not intend to harm the subject, they may still be liable for damages. If a party can prove actual malice, then the damages may be significantly more. Liability for the republication of libelous statements can be a serious issue that should be taken seriously.
To know more about Liability 8 , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30805836
#SPJ4
Jamelle borrowed $20,000 from a bank to purchase a car. This is an example of a
Hello! Based on the information provided, this is an example of a Car Loan.
I hope this helps! :)
Which of the following is an example of passive income
Answer:
there isn't anything showing. I can't help if I can't see the actual problem.
Answer:
food
Explanation:
The highest court in Ghana is Court of appeal a. b. Circuit court c. District court d. Supreme court.
Dr .Henry lee testimony o.j simpson
Answer:
itz a case...
Explanation:
Renowned forensic scientist Henry Lee said Thursday that the O.J. Simpson double-murder trial in 1995 not only revealed the racial chasm in America but the importance of strictly following established protocols in processing crime scenes.
“There were so many issues with the major crime scene in that case,” said Mr. Lee, who holds a doctorate and who testified for five days as a defense expert for Simpson. “This case set the landmarks for crime scene and laboratory handling of evidence.’
Mr. Lee’s comments came on the first day of the two-day inaugural conference “Pioneers of Forensic Science,” at which he is the first honoree. One of the world’s foremost criminalists, Mr. Lee has been involved in the Laci Peterson, JonBenet Ramsey, Caylee Anthony and Vince Foster cases, among many others.
Mr. Lee, Connecticut’s chief emeritus of scientific services, has served as that state’s commissioner of public safety, forensic science laboratory director and chief criminalist. He is the founder of the University of New Haven’s Henry C. Lee Institute of Forensic Science and is the namesake of its Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice and Forensic Sciences.
He spoke on a panel “People v. O.J. Simpson: An Interdisciplinary Retrospective on the Case that Brought Forensic Science to the World.”
Other panelists included F. Lee Bailey, a member of Simpson’s “Dream Team” of defense attorneys; Dr. Michael Baden, former chief medical examiner for New York City who also was a Simpson defense expert; and Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, Pittsburgh’s renowned forensic pathologist who was an expert commentator on the Simpson case on national television programs. He also is the namesake of Duquesne University’s Cyril H. Wecht Institute of Forensic Science and Law, the conference sponsor. University President Kenneth G. Gormley, who holds law degree, moderated the two-hour panel discussion.
A native of China, Mr. Lee said he had no idea who Mr. Simpson was when he was asked to be an expert for him at trial. He reconstructed the crime scene and examined every piece of evidence collected.
“I knew there was something wrong with the case by the physical evidence. There were lots of problems.”
He discovered that notes taken by Los Angeles Police Department criminalists at the scene were later substituted with other documents. “We found this out because the notes are stapled, but we found extra staple holes,” meaning they had been re-stapled.
Mr. Lee recounted his testimony about a crucial piece of the prosecution’s evidence—a bloodstain found on the walkway outside the Bundy Drive home where Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman were killed in June 1994.
DNA tests indicated O.J. Simpson was the likely source of the blood, but Mr. Lee testified he was suspicious because he discovered four small patches of blood on the paper packet wrapped around the Bundy evidence. That would indicate the blood swatches were wet and leaked onto the paper, yet LAPD technicians had testified that they left the swatches to dry overnight.
Asked by defense attorney Barry Scheck to account for the stains, Mr. Lee famously answered, “The only explanation I can give under these circumstances is, something’s wrong.”
As a scientist, Mr. Lee wouldn’t speculate either at the trial or at Thursday’s conference about how that could have occurred, but Mr. Bailey isn’t a scientist, so he wasn’t so circumspect. That evidence and the infamous glove and the bloody sock and anything else indicating Simpson’s guilt was planted, he said.
Which of the following are required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act? (Select all that apply.) art 2 of 3 21 Check All That Apply Skipped Auditors of public companies are allowed to perform nonaudit services for audit clients as long as the audit committee of the company being audited has preapproved those services. Book Print Auditors of public companies must retain all audit or review work papers for seven years or face the threat of a prison term for willful violations Corporate executives who personally certify financial statements that are fraudulently misstated may be fined and/or imprisoned. Lead audit partners are required to rotate every seven years.
Answer:
1. Book Prink Auditors of public companies must retain all audit or review work papers for seven years or face the threat of a prison term for willful violations.
2. Corporate executives who personally certify financial statements that are fraudulently misstated may be fined and/or imprisoned.
3. Lead audit partners are required to rotate every seven years.
Explanation:
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)
SOX has several requirements to improve corporate governance and financial reporting.
Retention of audit work papers, auditors of public companies must keep their audit or review work papers for seven years to ensure transparency and accountability.
Accountability of corporate executives, executives who certify fraudulent financial statements risk fines and imprisonment, highlighting the need of correct reporting.
Lead audit partners are rotated, to guarantee independence and objectivity, the primary auditors who oversee corporate audits must change every seven years.
True or false? the professor uses the phrases the law of ideas and intellectual property law interchangeably.
Answer:
True or false? the professor uses the phrases the law of ideas and intellectual property law interchangeably.
false
3 ways political parties help citizens
Answer:
1) The select candidates, set goals, and provide leadership.
2) The give citizens a voice in our government, they inform citizens
3) They involve citizens regularly
Explanation:
Hope this helps you as much as intended.
If Kripto sues Attorney Porquine for breach of the Jones-Porquine contract to recover what he would have received under the will, could Attorney Porquine successfully defend himself due to Kripto not having standing to sue? Why or why not?
Answer:
Following are the solution to the given question:
Explanation:
No, Sandy Porquine cannot defend himself successfully. This is because Kripto is the designated beneficiary in the contract between Emma Jones and Sandy Porcupine. Beneficiaries intended to seek a court resolution (have a duty to prosecute) if their contract rights are violated. Sandy Porquine also couldn't apply this theory effectively, Kripto had obtained a right.
An individual accused and convicted of a crime believes that the trial court made a mistake applying the law to the case. What can the accused legally do in this case?.
An individual accused and convicted of a crime believes that the trial court made a mistake applying the law to the case. In this situation this is legally appeal.
In the legal system, an appeal is the procedure by which a matter is examined by a higher authority and the parties ask for a formal revision of a ruling. Appellations serve two purposes: they remedy mistakes and they clarify and interpret the law.
Despite the fact that appellate courts have existed for thousands of years, common law nations did not codify an affirmative right to appeal into their legal systems until the 19th century. The idea of a right to appeal is a relatively new concept in common law jurisdictions, despite some scholars' claims that it "is itself a substantive liberty interest." Observers have also noted that common law regimes were notably "slow to integrate a right to appeal into either its civil or criminal.
To know more about Appeal in law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14992025
#SPJ4
What is the term for the action of a party to a contract who notifies the other party that he or she will not perform his or her duty under a contract?.
Anticipatory Repudiation is the term for the action of a party to a contract who notifies the other party that he or she will not perform his or her duty under a contract.
Legally, one party's failure to satisfy any of its contractual obligations is referred to as a "breach" of the agreement. Relying on the specifics, a breach can occur whilst a party fails to perform on time, does not perform according to the terms of the agreement, or does now not perform in any respect.
A mission is the transfer of rights held with the aid of one birthday celebration known as the “assignor” to another birthday party referred to as the “assignee.” The prison nature of the assignment and the contractual phrases of the settlement among the parties determines a few additional rights and liabilities that accompany the task.
Learn more about contracts here https://brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ4
What is a document called that is filed with the court to state the position of the plaintiff or the defendant in a lawsuit and ask for relief from the court?.
The document is called Pleadings.
What is a Lawsuit?A lawsuit is an action brought by one or more parties in a civil court of law against another party. Only a limited number of laws from long ago that are still in force include the phrase "suit in law." The term "lawsuit" refers to a civil action in which the plaintiff asks the court for a legal or equitable remedy.
The plaintiff's complaint must get a response from the defendant. If the plaintiff wins, a judgment will be rendered in their favor, and the court may then make a number of orders, including those to uphold a right, grant damages, or impose a temporary or permanent injunction to stop or compel action. It is possible to issue a declaratory decision to end future legal problems.
To know more about Lawsuit, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/18273856
#SPJ4
Which of the following are consistent with Contractionary Fiscal Policy
Deficit
Lower Taxes
Lower Government Spending
Raise Taxes
Increase the Federal Debt
Surplus
Increase Government Spending
Decrease the Federal Debt
Answer:
Lower Government Spending
Raise Taxes
what do sugar gliders eat?
i just got a new sugar glider but dont know what to feed it... any suggestions??
Answer:
saos and guns from acacia and eucalyptus, tree, nectar, pollen, fruits, and insects
Explanation:
Sugar gliders eat a mixture of insects and fruits and vegetables. Feed your glider once in the morning and once at dusk to keep it from getting too hungry. Give it a balance of 1 part protein, 1 part fruits or vegetables, and 1 part calcium. Healthy proteins include bugs, hard-boiled eggs, and boiled chicken or turkey.
Which of the following items is most commonly used to check the status of a court case? a. Private letter ruling b. Citator c. Revenue ruling d. Tax digest
20. The difference between law and regulation is that A. regulation is created by Congress B. regulation isn't created by Congress C. law is created by a non-government agency D. Iaw is associated with penalties
The difference between law and regulation is that regulation isn't created by Congress. So the correct option is B.
Laws, also known as statutes, are created by legislative bodies such as Congress. They are the formal rules enacted by a government that apply to individuals and entities within a jurisdiction. Laws are established through the legislative process and carry the force of the government's authority. They address fundamental legal principles, rights, obligations, and prohibitions.
On the other hand, regulations are created by administrative agencies or executive branches of government. They are derived from the authority granted to these agencies by the laws passed by Congress or other legislative bodies. Regulations provide specific details, guidelines, and procedures for implementing and enforcing the laws. They are more focused and specific than laws and often deal with technical or operational aspects within a specific domain or industry.
While laws are associated with penalties for non-compliance, the option D ("law is associated with penalties") does not capture the complete difference between law and regulation, as regulations can also be associated with penalties for non-compliance. Therefore, option D alone does not sufficiently differentiate between law and regulation.
To know more about obligations.
https://brainly.com/question/32907342
#SPJ11
what was the immediate result of the emancipation proclamation?
In addition to the nation's reunification, the Proclamation specifically added the elimination of slavery to the list of goals for the Union military effort. The Proclamation forbade European armies from intervening in the battle on the Confederacy's behalf.
On January 1, 1863, President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which said that "all persons held as slaves" in the areas under rebellion "are, and henceforth shall be free."
In an effort to preserve the Union together and prevent the Southern states from seceding, the North launched the Civil War's initial offensive against the South. Slavery was not one of the war's goals, despite the fact that sectional conflicts over the practice had been a significant contributing factor.
Learn more about the emancipation proclamation here:
https://brainly.com/question/29788953
#SPJ4
The purpose of the state of union address is to provide the opportunity for the
Answer:
The purpose of the State of the Union address is to provide the opportunity for the "President to address Congress and the nation about the legislative goals to be accomplished," since this is one of the few times that the President has the attention of the entire Congress.
Explanation:
Police work involves the threat of violence such as gunfire, stabbing, or assault
against officers. Provide two examples of other dangers (aside from outright
violence) associated with police work that an officer might face
Answer:
Law enforcement officers face many hazards in the line of duty. Though injuries from assaults and vehicular accidents are the most obvious, stress, cardiovascular disease, depression, and sulcide are also serious job-related risks.
A d-snp member loses his eligibility due to a change or loss of medicaid status. What cost sharing is he responsible for while in the grace period?.
The cost sharing that the member is responsible for would be the Medicare cost-sharing portion.
What is the Medicare?This is the term that is used to refer to the insurance policy that is given to the citizens of the United States based on the fact that it would help to reduce the cost that they would have paid for several health bills.
It is a health type of insurance for those that are of 65 years and above and the younger people that are found to be eligible. The plan also include the people in the nation that are found to have one disease or the other.
Read more on Medicare here: https://brainly.com/question/1960701
#SPJ1
Who is the chief of state?
Answer:
The President is both the head of state and head of government of the United States of America, and Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces.
Thomas is a 14-year-old student who applies for a job operating machinery at a local grocery store. Though he would make a good employee, the store manager declines to hire him. What law is this based on?
Answer: child labor law
Explanation: hes too young to be allowed to work legally
amicus curiae briefs are significant because . a. they benefit the government more than they benefit others b. they may influence whether the supreme court decides to hear a case c. they help to limit the influence of interest groups d. they expand the power of the supreme court
Amicus curiae briefs are significant because they may influence whether the supreme court decides to hear a case. The correct option B.
An amicus curiae is someone who is not part of the case, but who assists in presenting information to the court that is relevant to the case. The amicus curiae provide advice or expertise to the court that helps the judges make decisions in a fair and unbiased manner.Amicus curiae briefs are significant because they help to influence whether the supreme court decides to hear a case. Interest groups and other organizations often file briefs in cases that they believe will have significant implications for their interests or that involve legal issues that are important to them. They are not part of the case, but they provide important information that can influence the court's decision.A significant factor in whether the supreme court decides to hear a case is the amount and quality of the content-loaded amicus curiae briefs that are filed. If a case has a large number of amicus curiae briefs, it is often seen as an indication that the case has a high level of significance or public interest. The court will then decide whether to hear the case based on the legal and factual issues presented in the briefs.Learn more about Amicus curiae: https://brainly.com/question/15520019
#SPJ11
Termination of a partnership is difficult without a(n) ______ Agreement.A PartnershipB CorporateC TaxD Employment
The correct answer is A) Partnership.
A partnership is a type of business organization in which two or more individuals share the ownership and management of a business. Unlike a corporation, a partnership does not have a separate legal entity from its owners, and the partners are personally liable for the debts and obligations of the partnership.
One of the challenges of operating a partnership is that it can be difficult to terminate the partnership without a clear partnership agreement in place. A partnership agreement is a legal document that outlines the terms and conditions of the partnership, including the roles and responsibilities of each partner, the distribution of profits and losses, and the process for terminating the partnership.
Without a partnership agreement, it can be difficult to determine how to dissolve the partnership and distribute the assets and liabilities among the partners. This can lead to disputes and legal challenges, which can be costly and time-consuming.
In some cases, state laws may provide default rules for the termination of a partnership in the absence of a partnership agreement. However, these rules may not be well-suited to the specific circumstances of the partnership, and may not provide a fair or efficient process for dissolving the partnership.
Overall, it is highly recommended that partners in a partnership create a partnership agreement that clearly outlines the terms and conditions of the partnership, including the process for terminating the partnership. This can help avoid disputes and legal challenges in the event of a partnership termination, and can provide a clear and fair process for distributing assets and liabilities among the partners.
To know more about Partnership, please click on:
https://brainly.com/question/19988417
#SPJ11
Discuss the legalities of using ruses and pretexts to gain confidential information regarding a target from sources. What are
appropriate deceptive plays and which ones should be illegal? Why? Explain and support your answer.
Pretexting is the act or practice of gaining information about a subject by misrepresentation or under false pretenses. Pretexting is capable to leaving companies involved open to liability claims
The need to understand when pretexting is illegal within federal and state laws, how pretexting has been interpreted by the courts, the type of pretexting that are legal but also not advisable, as well as steps to take against being pretexting when investigative tasks are outsourced
The use of pretext to obtain telephone records or financial information is explicitly against federal law and pretexting used for criminal purposes are stopped by prosecutors using other existing federal laws
However, pretexting in the form of undercover investigation is completely legal, provided the investigator does not present them selves as a person of authority
Learn more about using ruses and pretexting to obtain confidential information here:
https://brainly.com/question/9321150
https://brainly.com/question/14049478
Formal authority is
A. an established organization, especially one providing a public service.
B. the ability to cause others to behave as they might not otherwise choose
to do.
C. the legal right or power to give orders and enforce rules.
the process and method of making decisions for groups.
Answer: C. the legal right or power to give orders and enforce rules.
Explanation:
Formal authority is the power that is given to a leader by an organization.
in the high-profile 2018 trial of paul manafort, the jury sent a letter to the judge claiming that they could not agree on all of the 18 charges. in order to discourage a mistrial, the judge gave the jury supplemental instruction to continue deliberation. what is the supplemental instruction called?
The supplemental instruction given to a deadlocked jury to encourage them to continue deliberating is called an "Allen Charge" or "Allen Instruction.
" It is named after the U.S. Supreme Court case Allen v. United States, in which the Court upheld the use of the instruction as a means of encouraging jurors to reach a verdict. The accusation was first used in a Massachusetts case in 18513, and the Supreme Court approved it in Allen v. United States in 1896.
An Allen charge is a supplemental jury instruction provided by the court to persuade a deadlocked jury to strive harder to achieve a judgment. It is named after the case Allen vs. United States, 164 U.S. 492 (1896). Allen charges are also known as Dynamite Instructions, Shotgun Instructions, and Third Degree Instructions.
Learn more about supplemental instruction
https://brainly.com/question/30582123
#SPJ4
Sebastian is skateboarding outside the local rec center. On the sidewalk, he finds a wallet that someone has dropped. Sebastian does not see anyone around, and the wallet does not contain an ID, so he takes the wallet inside the recreation center to give to the desk. He hopes that the owner will come looking for it. What are Sebastian’s actions an example of? A. crime B. folkway C. more D. law
Answer:
law i think
Explanation:
if not its more