General strain theory (GTS)- A comprehensive viewpoint that contends that breaking the law is a coping strategy used by offenders to handle the socioemotional issues brought on by unfavorable social interactions.
The general strain theory (GST) offers a distinctive justification for criminal behaviour. GST is the only significant theory of crime and delinquency to emphasize the significance of negative emotions in the etiology of offending, in contrast to control and learning theories, which both implicitly rely on unfavorable treatment by others. According to GST, feeling under pressure or stressed tends to cause unpleasant feelings including resentment, irritation, melancholy, and hopelessness. It is believed that these unfavourable feelings put pressure on people to take corrective action, with crime or delinquency being one option. GST was created in part to respond to objections raised about earlier iterations of strain theory. Previous iterations of the strain theory have come under fire for their restricted focus on potential strains, failure to explain why only certain strained people turn to crime or delinquency, and lack of empirical support. GST has made some progress in overcoming these restrictions. Since its conception, the theory has drawn a lot of interest from academics, garnered some modest empirical support, and has been credited with reviving the strain theory heritage. GST's full potential hasn't yet been realized, yet, as the idea is still being developed and more testing is needed.
Learn more about General strain theory here
https://brainly.com/question/11610199
#SPJ4
Does the state pay tor the cost of an individuak that has probation
a party can be given the authority to write checks, collect insurance proceeds, and otherwise manage the affairs of a person who is incapacitated through
a party can be given the authority to write checks, collect insurance proceeds, and otherwise manage the affairs of a person who is incapacitated through Power of attorney A power of attorney (POA) is a legally binding document that allows you to appoint someone to manage your property, medical, or financial affairs. Although it can be uncomfortable to think about needing one, a POA is an important part of any estate plan. Anyone over 18 can create a POA, and it's a common starting point for people who are ready to start formalizing plans for their future.
POA is typically used by those who cannot manage their affairs. This is generally due to an illness, aging, a disability, or simply being away for an extended period of time.
To know more about POA , visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/1656777 #SPJ4
True or false?
Adult children have a
right to their parents'
medical records,
There was no discussion within the federal government about the need to create a department such as Homeland Security prior to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.
True
False
There was no discussion within the federal government about the need to create a department such as Homeland Security prior to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, which is false in the second option.
What are terrorist attacks?The 9/11 attacks served as a catalyst for the creation of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and the federal government needed to do more to prevent and respond to terrorist threats. The 9/11 Commission, which was created to investigate the attacks and improve national security, called for the creation of a single department.
Hence, there was no discussion within the federal government about the need to create a department such as Homeland Security prior to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, which is false in the second option.
Learn more about the terrorist attacks here.
https://brainly.com/question/329867
#SPJ1
If someone owns a piece of land, do they own it all the way to the center of the earth?
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
they bought it
what opportunities for involvement in your community appeal to you and why
Answer:
Environmental protection is the opportunity that appeals to me in the community. The climate change can be considered the main challenge of human beings on earth. Climate change has caused various tragedies from forest fires to catastrophic storms across the USA.
Explanation:
The you people can make a difference in the society.
Community involvement and volunteering are helping to attract and retain employees in a whole new way. In a recent survey, 55% of respondents said that a company’s support for social causes was an important factor in accepting a job offer.
There are several opportunities for involvement in a community that can impact and promote the quality of life of residents, such as promoting sustainability and environmental protection.
You can contribute to sustainability in your community through your personal habits, sharing information and creating events and lectures to raise awareness.
Some simple attitudes and changes in daily habits are already capable of promoting environmental responsibility, such as:
Separation and recycling of household waste.Water economy.Reduced consumption of red meat.Use of ecological transport.Therefore, every individual can help in the development of their community, seek information on what their community's greatest needs are and find out how you are able to help.
Learn more here:
https://brainly.com/question/1051849
1. How can the principles of Ubuntu be applied in the criminal justice system to ensure justice for victims? (200 words, 5 marks)
The concepts of social justice embraced by Ubuntu include equity (encourages interdependence), fairness, and equality (promotes equal opportunities) (brings about equal sharing of resources such that all members survive).
How should the principles of Ubuntu be applied to the criminal justice system to assist victims in receiving justice?In Bantu, the word "Ubuntu" means "humanity" and is an African word. The full concept of "humanity for others" is expressed in this sentence. If a person has endured physical, mental, or emotional injury, they are regarded as a victim.
When a victim reports an incident, police take the proper action by acquiring all necessary data. Nonetheless, Ubuntu's guiding principles place more of an emphasis on what is ethically right than what is right. The general population ought to have more empathy for the victims and treat them with dignity.
Occasionally, a victim will kill a perpetrator. It is not appropriate for the investigating authorities to assume the victim was also the attacker in this situation. Investigating the scene of the crime and obtaining the murderer's testimony should be the police' top priorities. Prior to the investigation's conclusion, they shouldn't regard the person as either a victim or a criminal.
Compared to other philosophies, Ubuntu's approach to problem solving is slightly different. We should always have a big picture in Ubuntu. For instance, when a person travels, they might not always have a place to stay. The villagers may occasionally provide the things that the travelers need. The fact that the villagers give the travelers supplies is unimportant, but they nevertheless do it. This is due to their increased humanity and the assistance they give to others.
When a person poses a threat to large individuals, poisoning the subject is necessary. According to Ubuntu's guiding principles, a victim should be handled with compassion and ethics.
Learn more about Ubuntu's guiding principles: https://brainly.com/question/17259369
#SPJ9
Which of the following acts was enacted in order to allow employees who are terminated, laid off, or have a change in their employment status to temporarily remain on the employer-sponsored medical insurance plan?
a. The Civil Rights Act of 1991
b. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA)
c. The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA)
d. The Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, or the COBRA 1985, was enacted in order to let the temporarily deceased employees on the employer-sponsored medical insurance plan. Therefore, the option C holds true.
A medical insurance plan which is enacted under the sponsorship of an employee is usually terminated as soon as the employee is deceased from the services of being employed in the company. However, being protected under the COBRA Act, passed in the year 1985, the employees continue to derive benefits out of the medical insurance plans.
Learn more about medical insurance here:
https://brainly.com/question/29241878
#SPJ4
congress enacts a law prohibiting toys made in the country of zzz from being sold in the united states. the hawaii state legislature enacts a law allowing the sale of zzz-made toys. hawaii's law will most likely be
hawaii's law will most likely be Preempted by the federal law.
Preemption is a principle in the US legal system that allows federal laws to take precedence over state laws when there is a conflict between them. In this case, the federal law passed by Congress prohibits the sale of ZZZ-made toys in the United States, while the state law passed by the Hawaii legislature allows the sale of those toys. Since the two laws are in conflict, the federal law would likely be considered to have preempted the state law and would therefore take precedence. This means that the state law allowing the sale of ZZZ-made toys would likely be invalidated and would not be able to be enforced.
Learn more about the legal principle of preemption and its application to federal and state laws in the United States here: https://brainly.com/question/28444164
#SPJ4
Which consequences can victims of identity theft face? check all that apply.which person is a victim of identity theft?
1. difficulty getting a loan or credit card
2. an increase in debt
3. difficulty keeping assets
4. a loss of money
5. difficulty landing a new job
Victims of identity theft can face a variety of consequences, including difficulty getting a loan or credit card, an increase in debt, difficulty keeping assets, a loss of money, and difficulty landing a new job.
Identity theft occurs when someone steals another person's personal information and uses it for their own gain. This can result in the victim experiencing financial losses, which can affect their ability to obtain credit, maintain assets, and secure employment. For example, if a victim's credit score is negatively impacted by the identity theft, they may struggle to get approved for loans or credit cards. Additionally, the victim may face increased debt if the thief opens accounts or makes purchases in their name. The victim may also have difficulty keeping their assets if the thief gains access to their bank accounts or other financial information. Finally, the victim may experience a loss of money if the thief drains their accounts or makes fraudulent purchases. victims of identity theft can face a range of negative consequences, including financial losses and difficulties obtaining credit, keeping assets, and finding employment. It is important for individuals to take steps to protect their personal information and monitor their accounts for signs of fraudulent activity.
to know about identity theft visit:
https://brainly.com/question/19215076
#SPJ11
Differentiate the classification of food and beverages facilities
Answer:
Food and beverage facilities are classified into two namely; the Primary and Secondary facilities.
While the Primary facilities are mainly concerned with the preparation of food and beverages for the customers, the Secondary facilities are concerned with the provision of catering services as an arm of another business entity.
Explanation:
In the Primary Food and Beverage facilities, the main focus of such facilities is the preparation of food and beverage for customers. Examples of facilities under this category include hotels, bars, restaurants, coffee shops, etc.
The Secondary Food and Beverage Facilities are an arm or offshoot of another business. Examples of these are the catering services offered in commercial vehicles, in airplanes, on the trains, at the offices, or on the ships. So they are just one of the many services offered by these media.
Which action is an example of an "implied" power? (Congress) A- Congress votes to raise income taxes B- Congress holds an investigation on women in the military C- Congress declares war on a country for sponsoring terroisim D- Congress decides to close post offices in rural areas on Saturdays
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
An implied power can be described as those powers which does not exist in the Constitution of the United States but expressly stated due to similar powers enjoyed by the Congress.
When the framers of the Constitution were drafting the document they had in mind that the needs of people will grow with the growing nation, so in Article I they gave the Congress right to excercise the power under the 'Necessary and Proper Clause.'
So, an example of implied power from the given options would be D. Congress have right to use implied power to close post offices in rural areas on Saturdays. Therefore, option D is correct.
Which crime is BEST represented by the following situation? Dagan sneaks into an event center through an unlocked window to steal valuable items on display for an event the next day.
Answer:
Theft
Explanation:
In order for complete diversity to exist, which of the following must be TRUE? [a] all parties are citizens of different states [b] all P are citizens of different states [c] all D are citizens of different states [d] no D is a citizen of the same state as any P
In order for complete diversity to exist no D is a citizen of the same state as any P. Option D is correct.
In United States law, complete diversity is a term used in relation to diversity jurisdiction, which is a form of subject-matter jurisdiction that gives the power to hear lawsuits that do not involve a federal question for U.S. federal courts. To have diverse jurisdiction over a lawsuit, two conditions must be met by the U.S. federal court.
The First condition is there must be “diversity of citizenship” between the parties, meaning the plaintiffs must be citizens of different U.S. states than the defendants. The Second condition is the lawsuit’s “amount in controversy” must be more than $75,000.
To learn more about Diversity.
https://brainly.com/question/30144508
#SPJ4
How do drivers who have a physical dissability compensate for their dissabilityy
Answer:
Adapted Vehicles, & etc.
Explanation:
Drivers who have a physical disability may compensate for their disability in various ways, depending on the nature and severity of the disability. Some common methods of compensation include:
Adapted vehicles: Many drivers with physical disabilities use vehicles that have been adapted to their specific needs. For example, a driver with a lower limb disability may use a car with hand controls or a wheelchair-accessible van.Prosthetic devices: Drivers with limb amputations or other physical impairments may use prosthetic devices to help them operate a vehicle. For example, a driver with a missing left hand may use a prosthetic device that attaches to the steering wheel to help with steering.Assistive technology: There are a variety of assistive technologies available to help drivers with physical disabilities. For example, some drivers may use voice-activated controls, touchscreens, or other devices to operate their vehicle.Training and education: Drivers with physical disabilities may undergo specialized training and education to help them compensate for their disability. This may include training on how to use assistive technology or specialized driving techniques.Medical treatment: In some cases, drivers with physical disabilities may receive medical treatment or physical therapy to help them compensate for their disability. For example, a driver with a spinal cord injury may undergo physical therapy to improve their upper body strength and coordination.im trying not to fail answer this to get points XD ,
Answer:
?????
Questions???
Explanation:
What is the question?
1. You are a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state. Your state is running short of money to carry out some much needed programs. As a possible solution you suggest that the state government issue its own currency to people who work for it. The currency can be exchanged for dollar bills at a rate that is to be fixed by the state the first of every month. Is your idea constitutional?
2. Later in the legislative session mentioned in exercise 8, you become disenchanted with your fellow citizens when you learn that only 28 percent of those eligible to vote actually did so in the last election. Consequently, you pass a law requiring that everyone vote in every election. What arguments can you make in support of such a measure? Against?
Answer:
Explanation:
As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.
Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.
While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.
However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.
In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.
Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:
1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.
2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.
3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.
On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:
1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.
2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.
3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.
Which isolating mechanism is set up to legally prevent companies from copying products that give a firm a competitive advantage?
a) intellectual property protection
b) social complexity
c) path dependence
d) causal ambiguity
The isolating mechanism that is set up to legally prevent companies from copying products that give a firm a competitive advantage is a) intellectual property protection.
Intellectual property refers to the legal rights that protect creations of the mind, such as inventions, designs, and artistic works. It includes various forms of protection, including patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets.
Patents, in particular, are often used to protect products that give a firm a competitive advantage. A patent gives the inventor the exclusive right to make, use, and sell the invention for a certain period of time, usually 20 years from the date of filing. This prevents others from making, using, or selling the same invention without the inventor's permission, providing a legal means of protecting a company's intellectual property and competitive advantage.
To know more about patents here
https://brainly.com/question/12882864
#SPJ4
Legislative Branch
Executive Branch
Judicial Branch
Who is a part of it?
Who is a part of it?
Who is a part of it?
Qualifications:
Qualifications:
Qualifications:
What do they do?
What do they do?
What do they do?
Answer:Legislative branch is congress,the senate and the House of Representatives The legislative branch make lawsExecutive branch is the president, Vice President ,the cabinet membersThey enforce the lawsJudicial branch is the Supreme Court and other federal court .They interpret the law
Explanation: Just did the assigment
Question 2
State e general principles of succession in terms of onginal comary law. (10) Question 3
Evaluate the following statemen's
1.According to section 2 of the Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act 41 of 2003, the recognition of traditional commurdles is conditional to complying with certain standards.
2.When the Constitution of South Africa of 1996 became effective courts of Traditional leaders were discontinued. (5)
3.In terms of African customary law, a child is not criminally liable (5)
From the question given we evaluated statements concerning the recognition of traditional communities in South Africa, the discontinuation of courts of Traditional leaders, and the criminal liability of children under African customary law.
According to section 2 of the Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act 41 of 2003, what is recognition of traditional commurdles is conditional to complying with certain standards.1. The statement is correct. Section 2 of the Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act 41 of 2003 provides that traditional communities must meet certain criteria to be recognized by the state. The Act specifies that traditional communities must have a distinct cultural identity, a traditional leader, and a system of governance that is recognized by the community members.
2. The statement is incorrect. The Constitution ofb recognizes traditional leadership and courts, and provides for their continued existence. Traditional leaders have a role to play in the administration of justice, and the Constitution recognizes their jurisdiction in certain areas.
3. The statement is incorrect. In terms of African customary law, a child can be held criminally liable for their actions. However, the age of criminal responsibility varies between different African countries and cultures. In South Africa, for example, children under the age of 10 cannot be held criminally liable, while children between the ages of 10 and 14 are presumed to lack criminal capacity unless it can be proved that they knew the wrongfulness of their actions.
Learn more on traditional governance here;
https://brainly.com/question/30374769
#SPJ1
which of these cases determined that an intent to cause harm must be proven for comments on social media to be considered threats? wisconsin v. yoder (1972) tinker v. des moines (1969) elonis v. united states (2015) united states v. windsor (2013)
The case that determined that an intent to cause harm must be proven for comments on social media to be considered threats is Elonis v. United States (2015).
Elonis v. United States (2015) is the case that specifically addressed the issue of intent in relation to comments made on social media being considered threats. Anthony Elonis, the petitioner in the case, had posted violent and threatening statements on his social media, leading to his arrest and conviction under federal law. The key question before the Supreme Court was whether a subjective intent to threaten was required to classify such statements as true threats, or if an objective standard would suffice.
In its ruling, the Supreme Court held that an intent to cause harm must be proven for comments on social media to be considered threats. The Court emphasized that the First Amendment protection of free speech requires the government to show that the individual making the statements intended to communicate a true threat. Mere recklessness or negligence in making the statements was not sufficient to warrant a criminal conviction, as it would unduly limit freedom of expression. This ruling reaffirmed the importance of protecting individuals' First Amendment rights while recognizing the need to address genuine threats to public safety.
To learn more about Supreme Court click here, brainly.com/question/29759733
#SPJ11
Complete the table below comparing your opinion of the rights listed to a corresponding ethical theory:
The right to a higher education
The right to private phone conversations
The right to health care
The right of a presidential or government candidate to receive time on television
My Opinion
Ethical Theory
Current U.S. Government Stance
Current Stance of Another Country
The right to a higher education
The right to private phone conversations
The right to health care
The right of a presidential/government candidate to receive time on television
List 1 ethical challenge that could impact a U.S. company that wants to acquire a non-U.S.-based company.
Ethical theories are philosophical frameworks that provide principles and guidelines for determining what actions are right or wrong, good or bad, just or unjust.
The right to a higher education: (Ethical Theory) The right to a higher education could be supported by the social contract theory, which argues that society has an obligation to provide basic services and opportunities to its citizens in exchange for their obedience to the laws and rules of the society.
The right to private phone conversations: (Ethical Theory) The right to privacy could be supported by the deontological theory, which emphasizes the importance of individual autonomy and the duty to respect individual rights.
The right to health care: (Ethical Theory) The right to health care could be supported by the utilitarian theory, which argues that the greatest good for the greatest number of people should be the goal of society.
The right of a presidential/government candidate to receive time on television: (Ethical Theory) The right to equal opportunities for political candidates could be supported by the egalitarian theory, which argues that all individuals should have equal access to political power and resources.
One ethical challenge that could impact a U.S. company that wants to acquire a non-U.S.-based company is the cultural differences and ethical norms of the target country. For example, some countries may have different attitudes towards bribery or corruption, and the U.S. company may need to navigate these differences and ensure that their acquisition process is ethical and transparent.
Additionally, there may be different labor laws or environmental regulations in the target country that the U.S. company will need to comply with, which could impact their operations and profitability.
Learn more about Ethical theories at:
brainly.com/question/11992384
#SPJ4
awarding of political jobs or contracts based on partisan ties instead of merit or expertise
The term for awarding political jobs or contracts based on partisan ties instead of merit or expertise is called patronage.
Patronage is the distribution of government positions, contracts, and other benefits to individuals based on their political support rather than their qualifications or merit.
Patronage is the act of giving jobs, contracts, and other benefits to supporters and friends of a political party or individual rather than considering their qualifications or merit. It's a form of corruption that has long been associated with politics.
Patronage is frequently used to reward political allies, supporters, and campaign donors with jobs, contracts, and other perks. As a result, patronage is often viewed as a way to gain and maintain political power, which can lead to inefficiency and waste in government.
awarding of political jobs or contracts based on partisan ties instead of merit or expertise is?
Learn more about political https://brainly.com/question/29979765
#SPJ11
What is the importance of hair in the successful investigation of murder, assault and etc.
Answer:
Obtaining palynological and other botanical evidence from murder victims is becoming part of routine mortuary protocol in the United Kingdom. Forensic pathologists are often keen to cooperate in the collection of classes of material that have, in the past, been considered to be of little importance in criminal investigation. Work over the last eight years has demonstrated the great value in scrutinising cadavers for the presence of plant material and/or soil stains. Macroscopic plant remains and palynomorphs (pollen, spores and other microscopic entities) retrieved from skin and hair have allowed the differentiation of murder scenes from places of eventual deposition. Furthermore, although the opportunity has not yet presented itself, obtaining palynological evidence from the hair of suspects is feasible. During an offence, the offender might have had physical contact with foliage or the ground. Pollen and spore assemblages picked up by hair during that activity might provide forensic evidence for contact. Brief details of some aspects of case histories are presented to demonstrate the value of sampling cadavers. One case has been through the courts while the other is ongoing and, therefore, cannot be identified
state courts cannot have concurrent jurisdiction with federal courts. true/false
True. Federal courts and state courts cannot share concurrent jurisdiction. Even when a federal court has jurisdiction, state law matters may not be decided by federal trial courts inside a particular state.
The most suitable court site for a case is determined by the venue. Federal courts and state courts cannot share concurrent jurisdiction. When two or more courts from various legal systems simultaneously hold jurisdiction over a certain case, this is known as concurrent jurisdiction.
The parties will attempt to have their civil or criminal action heard in the court they believe will be most favorable to them, which frequently results in forum shopping. The ability of two or more courts from various jurisdictions to hear the cases mentioned below is referred to.
Learn more about jurisdiction Visit: brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ4
Laws to protect consumer privacy are quickly becoming the norm. California created the first of these laws in 2018. What is the name of this law?.
Answer: The California Consumer Privacy Act
People and Families is the systems theory used to understand people, their families, and their dynamics.true or false
Answer:
True
Explanation:
This theory allows one to understand the organizational complexity of families, as well as the interactive patterns that guide family interactions. In order to understand a family system, we must look at the family as a whole and observe how they interact with each other to maintain homeostasis.
which group achieved the right to vote in the twenty-sixth amendment?
Tổng quát về hoạt động lập pháp của Singapore. So sánh với hoạt động lập
pháp của Việt Nam.
Answer:
I'm sorry don't know about this
The difference between unlimited wants and limited resources affects both individuals and the economy.
A.
True
OB.
False
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
I believe by having unlimited wants but not enough resources would be chaos. Resources are important in our life because they are used to sustain life and meet people's requirements. Any substance that people utilize can be recognized as a resource. By lacking them, common individuals would be highly affected, as the economy will collapse.