In ancient Rome, the judicial officer who had wide authority in cases of equity, was responsible for the production of the public games, and, in the absence of consuls, exercised extensive authority in the government is the Praetor.
Who were the consuls?The consuls were the chairmen of the Senate, that served as a board of advisers. They also directed the Roman army (both had two legions) and employed the highest juridical power in the Roman empire. Accordingly, the Greek historian Polybius of Megalopolis likened the consuls to kings.
Consuls, anyhow, were in a very real sense the heads of state. They directed the army, convened and presided over the Senate and the popular assemblies and accomplished their decrees, and represented the state in foreign affairs.
Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question: What is a judicial officer who had broad authority in cases of equity, was responsible for the production of the public games, and, in the absence of consuls, exercised extensive authority in the government?
Learn more about consuls at: https://brainly.com/question/22372879
#SPJ4
Which amendment was passed in 1868 and provided for due process of law, equal protection under the law, and respect for the privileges and immunities of all citizens?.
The 14th Amendment, which was adopted in 1868, guaranteed everyone's right to a fair trial, equal protection under the law, and respect for their rights to certain privileges and immunities.
All citizens, including former slaves, were guaranteed "equal protection of the laws" by the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution, which was enacted in 1868. It also granted citizenship to anybody born or naturalised in the nation. A number of significant Supreme Court decisions would later be built on one of the three Reconstruction-era amendments that granted Black Americans civil and legal rights and abolished slavery. Later provisions of the 14th Amendment mandated that anybody who "engaged in the rebellion" against the United States was forbidden from serving in the military, in the government, or in elected office, and that the federal By proportionally limiting the states' representation in Congress, the federal government might sanction states that restrict or violate the right of their residents to vote (without the approval of two-thirds of the House and Senate).
Learn more about 14th Amendment hear :
https://brainly.com/question/28725850
#SPJ4
What is element identification in the legal practice?
Answer:
this is what I found online:
"Element Identification is a helpful skill to decide what action is needed…… (IE levels of research via sources and or investigation.) By taking each legal situation and breaking. From this point you may begin identifying the. legal issue of the complaint/case."
What is the conflict perspective when it comes to income inequality?
Answer:
conflict theory: A social science perspective that holds that stratification is dysfunctional and harmful in society, with inequality perpetuated because it benefits the rich and powerful at the expense of the poor.
Does this help?
What is the federal election campaign act?
The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) is a United States federal law that regulates the financing of political campaigns.
The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) was passed in 1971 and amended in 1974 to create the Federal Election Commission (FEC) and establish limits on campaign contributions, require disclosure of campaign finance information, and set restrictions on political advertising.
FECA governs the way that federal election campaigns are funded and the rules for donations and expenditures by political candidates and committees. The law places limits on the amounts that individuals and organizations can donate to political campaigns and requires campaigns to report information about their donors and expenditures.
FECA also regulates the use of campaign funds and prohibits the use of campaign contributions for personal expenses. In addition, the law sets limits on the amount of money that candidates can contribute to their own campaigns.
To know more about Federal Election Campaign Act click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/30097932#
#SPJ11
a antisocialble behavior order is a order That will prevent you from being antisocialble with people and choosing not To Make friends
Answer:
There are types of antisocial behaviors
Explanation:
Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD)
Borderline personality disorder (BPD)
Histrionic personality disorder.
Narcissistic personality disorder.
these are just a few
but APD or antisocial personality disorder is a mental health disorder characterized by disregard for other people.
Those with antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) may begin to show symptoms in childhood, but the condition can't be diagnosed until adolescence or adulthood.
Those with antisocial personality disorder tend to lie, break laws, act impulsively, and lack regard for their own safety or the safety of others. Symptoms may lessen with age.
Question #4
Multiple Choice
plaintiff, he or she must be in the "zone of danger" where injury
To determine if someone is
could occur.
a worried
an injured
a foreseeable
an irresponsible
Explanation: An injured
I don't know if this is right, but I tried.
Less than _____% of all bills introduced become law
Which of the following is NOT a type of crime pattern analysis? *
Crime and incident series identification
General profile analysis
Victim identification
Hot spot identification
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
how did the president use historic or current examples and statistics to make his points?
The president used both historic and current examples and statistics to make his points.
He discussed the long-term decline in union membership since the 1950s, noting that in 1954, one-third of all American workers were union members, while in 2019, only 10.3% of all American workers were union members. He also discussed the current economic uncertainty caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, which has led to a surge in unemployment and a decrease in wages.
He highlighted the fact that while unemployment has declined since its peak in April 2020, it is still at a level higher than it was before the pandemic began. He also discussed the growing wealth gap between the wealthy and the poor, noting that the wealthiest 0.1% of Americans now own more wealth than the bottom 90% combined.
Finally, he discussed the importance of passing labor reforms, such as passing the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act, to ensure that workers have the right to unionize and to protect their rights on the job.
To learn more about historic and current examples link is here
brainly.com/question/28029513
#SPJ4
Morally, what can be blamed form corruption? Explain personal
point of view stating Why and contrast with economical
knowledge?
Essay type question, please
Corruption refers to the wrongful use of power and position for personal gain. The morally corrupt are those who practice it. The economic impact of corruption is enormous. Corruption is a serious crime that can be attributed to a variety of factors. Morally, corruption can be attributed to a lack of morality. People who lack moral values are more likely to engage in corrupt activities. Corruption can also be attributed to a lack of accountability. When people are not held accountable for their actions, they are more likely to engage in corrupt activities. Corruption can also be attributed to a lack of transparency. When there is no transparency, it is easier for people to engage in corrupt activities without getting caught. From a personal point of view, I believe that corruption is morally wrong. It is a serious crime that harms society as a whole. Corruption can lead to a lack of trust in government, which can lead to social unrest. It can also lead to economic stagnation, as corrupt officials tend to favor their own interests over the interests of the public. From an economic perspective, corruption has a significant impact on the economy. It can lead to reduced economic growth, as resources are diverted away from productive activities. Corruption can also lead to increased income inequality, as corrupt officials tend to favor the wealthy. Corruption also creates a negative environment for foreign investment, as investors are less likely to invest in countries with high levels of corruption. In conclusion, corruption is a serious crime that has significant moral and economic implications. It is important for governments to take strong action to prevent corruption, including implementing strong anti-corruption laws and promoting transparency and accountability. As individuals, we also have a responsibility to act with integrity and to speak out against corruption whenever we see it.
For more question like Corruption visit the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/31859384
#SPJ11
Chủ thể nào bắt buộc là cá nhân đủ điều kiện theo quy định pháp luật:
a. Cổ đông sáng lập công ty cổ phần c. Thành viên hợp danh
b. Thành viên của công ty hợp danh d. Thành viên công ty TNHH
Answer:
What's this bro
Explanation:
kichdi aaaaaaa
why are you rip offs
Answer:
i dont know bro just watch ads it's the best way
Explanation:
in a criminal trial the prosecutor called a witness to the stand to authenticate the voice in a tape recording as the defendant's. the only other time the witness had heard the defendant's voice was after his arrest. assuming a proper foundation has been laid, may the witness properly authenticate the defendant's voice? group of answer choices
Yes, as the witness is now accustomed to the voice of the defendant.
In a trial, may the witness properly authenticate the defendant's voice?
The witness can accurately confirm it because she is familiar with the defendant's voice at this point. Anybody who is familiar with the voice of the purported speaker may verify a voice recording by identifying the speaker. As a result, the witness can comment on whether the voice on the video is actually that of the defendant because she is now accustomed to hearing it.
As circumstantial evidence, the accused's actions either before or after the crime are extremely important. The circumstantial evidence in front of the court allows it to deduce facts and draw a conclusion.
Expert testimony is only appropriate in cases where the trier of fact would benefit from the expert's knowledge in order to appreciate the evidence or determine the fact at issue.
To know more about circumstantial evidence, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14263276
#SPJ4
read the excerpt from the fourteenth amendment to the constitution. no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states . . . how does the excerpt relate to the premises of brown v. board of education? the brown case addresses whether separate water fountains and entrances abridge students’ privileges. the brown case addresses whether education systems separated by race limit citizens’ privileges. the brown case addresses whether varied state curriculums inhibit students’ ability to learn. the brown case addresses whether teachers’ racial stereotyping restricts students’ rights and privileges.
The excerpt from the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which states that "no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States," relates to the premises of Brown v. Board of Education in the sense that the case addresses whether education systems separated by race limit citizens' privileges.
Brown v. Board of Education was a landmark Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of racial segregation in public schools. The Court ruled that separate educational facilities based on race were inherently unequal, violating the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
This decision recognized that segregated education abridged the privileges and rights of African American students, establishing a precedent for desegregation and equal access to education.
Learn more about Desegregation
https://brainly.com/question/29342609
#SPJ11
What is an arbitration decision called?
A. Judgment
B. Agreement
C. Award
D. Facilitator
Answer: C
Explanation:” This is like a judge's or jury's decision in a court case. Once the arbitrator decides that all of the parties' evidence and arguments have been presented, the arbitrator will close the hearings. Hope its right! Im pretty sure it is though
E=mc cubed, true or false?
Answer: false
Explanation:
Answer:
FALSE
Explanation:
I think but I'm not sure
monsters are monsters in my book
Answer:
David rossi
Explanation:
Answer:
.
Explanation:
The training that most law enforcement officers receive includes knowledge cultural diversity true or false
Answer:
true
Explanation:
What is the differences between law and ethic and law and religion?
— Ethics are a set of moral values an individual establishes for one's self and your own personal behavior. Laws are structured rules utilized to govern all of society. Differences between right and wrong or good and bad behavior. Laws are the rules a country or community mandates its citizens follow in order to regulate society. Religion is a structure of faith and worship. It's a belief system based on faith in a supernatural power.
pa brainlest po:) ThankYou
Hope it helps in you, GOODLUCK!
in a bench trial, the prosecutor seeks to make sure there is no doubt in the mind or minds of what entity that the defendant is guilty?
In a bench trial, the prosecutor seeks to make sure there is no doubt in the mind or minds of victim's family that the defendant is guilty.
What is bench trial?Bench trials, as opposed to jury trials, are judge-led trials. To distinguish the type of trial, the term is most appropriately used in relation to any administrative hearing regarding a summary offense. Bench trials are used in many legal systems for most or all cases, or for particular types of cases.
In a bench trial, the judge determines the procedural and evidentiary matters and serves as the fact-finder in place of the jury. The judge will render judgments, consider the evidence, and determine whether or not the defendant is guilty.
The trial procedure should be the same whether it is a bench trial or a jury trial, and if you are found guilty, you have the right to appeal your conviction to a higher court.
Learn more about bench trial
https://brainly.com/question/1150855
#SPJ1
Comente sobre a importância dos Direitos Humanos para o Estado Democrático de Direito e seus fundamentos na efetividade dos direitos fundamentais.
Answer:
Respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and the principle of holding ... The Rule of Law and Democracy Section stands as OHCHR focal point for ... Since its establishment in 2006, the Human Rights Council (successor to the ... relevant intergovernmental bodies and international organizations, published a .
Explanation:
Write 1000 words about Employment law in UK by using Gibbs
Reflective model.
The Gibbs Reflective model is used to develop a structured approach to learning from practical experience. It encourages a clear description of the situation, analysis of feelings, evaluation of the experience, analysis to make sense of the experience, and a plan of action to be taken.
Employment law in the UK using Gibbs Reflective Model Description: The topic that has been chosen is employment law in the UK. Employment law is a branch of law that deals with the legal rights and responsibilities of employers and employees. It governs the relationship between the two parties and sets out the terms and conditions of employment. This topic is relevant because employment law plays a significant role in ensuring that workers' rights are protected and that employers are held accountable for their actions. The situation being described is the current state of employment law in the UK, including the legal framework, statutory provisions, and case law. The situation is complicated, and there are many legal issues that employers and employees need to be aware of.
Feelings: Studying employment law in the UK can be overwhelming. It is a complex subject that requires careful analysis and understanding. At first, it was challenging to get to grips with the legal jargon and the technical aspects of employment law. However, after taking time to read through the relevant materials, I felt more confident and able to engage with the topic in a meaningful way.
Evaluation: The experience of studying employment law in the UK has been eye-opening. I have learned a great deal about the legal framework, statutory provisions, and case law. I have also gained an appreciation for the importance of employment law in protecting workers' rights and ensuring that employers are held accountable for their actions. One of the key takeaways from this experience is that employment law is constantly evolving, and it is important to stay up to date with the latest developments.
Analysis: Employment law in the UK is complex and multifaceted. There are many legal issues that employers and employees need to be aware of, including discrimination, harassment, and whistleblowing. One of the key challenges in this area is ensuring that workers' rights are protected while balancing the needs of employers. Employers must ensure that they comply with the law and that they do not discriminate against employees based on their age, gender, race, or religion. Employees, on the other hand, have a duty to work in good faith and to act in the best interests of their employer.
Plan of Action: To gain a better understanding of employment law in the UK, I plan to continue to read and research the topic. I will also seek out opportunities to engage with experts in the field and attend relevant events and seminars. By doing this, I hope to develop a deeper understanding of the legal framework, statutory provisions, and case law in this area of law. Additionally, I plan to use this knowledge to help educate others about their rights and responsibilities under employment law in the UK.
In conclusion, employment law in the UK is a complex and multifaceted area of law that requires careful analysis and understanding. The Gibbs Reflective model provides a useful framework for learning from practical experience and developing a structured approach to the topic. By using this model, it is possible to gain a deeper understanding of the legal framework, statutory provisions, and case law in this area of law.
Learn more about Gibbs Reflective model at: https://brainly.com/question/17512540
#SPJ11
which of the followings aspects of international law would enable a cyber-criminal operating across borders to evade prosecution? Non-existent extradition agreements between 2 countries
Non-existent extradition agreements between two countries can enable a cyber-criminal operating across borders to evade prosecution.
Extradition is the legal process through which one country surrenders an individual to another country for prosecution or punishment. It allows for the transfer of accused individuals from one jurisdiction to another to face criminal charges. However, in the absence of an extradition agreement between two countries, there is no legal framework to facilitate the extradition process.
For a cyber-criminal operating across borders, the lack of an extradition agreement can provide a safe haven, as they cannot be easily extradited to a country where they committed the crime. This can hinder international cooperation and make it challenging for law enforcement agencies to bring the cyber-criminal to justice.
Without an extradition agreement, the country where the cyber-criminal is residing may not be obligated to hand them over for prosecution, effectively allowing them to evade prosecution and continue their illegal activities.
The absence of extradition agreements between two countries can create loopholes that enable cyber-criminals operating across borders to evade prosecution. International cooperation and the establishment of extradition agreements are crucial in addressing cybercrime and ensuring that offenders are held accountable.
Learn more about law at:
brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ11
What are the duties of American citizens toward fellow citizens, american residents, and the world?
to legally drive a taxicab for the purpose of hauling passengers for hire or fare, the driver must hold a valid texas driver's license
To legally drive a taxicab for hire in Texas, the driver must hold a valid Texas driver's license.
What is the requirement for driving a taxicab in Texas?To operate a taxicab and transport passengers for fare or hire, the driver must possess a valid Texas driver's license. This means that individuals interested in becoming taxicab drivers must first obtain a driver's license issued by the state of Texas. Having a valid driver's license ensures that drivers have met the necessary requirements and qualifications to operate a vehicle safely and legally on Texas roads. Compliance with this regulation helps maintain standards and safety within the taxicab industry, protecting both drivers and passengers.
Learn more about taxicab
brainly.com/question/20770454
#SPJ11
When a juvenile commits an action that would NOT be considered criminal according to adult law it is considered to be?
When a juvenile commits an action that would not be considered criminal according to adult law, it is usually considered to be a delinquent act or a status offense.
What is delinquent act?A delinquent act is an act committed by a juvenile that would be considered a crime if committed by an adult, such as theft or assault. In contrast, a status offense is an act that is illegal only because the offender is a minor, such as truancy, curfew violations, or running away from home.
The juvenile justice system is designed to address delinquent behavior and provide services and interventions to help young people who have committed these acts to rehabilitate and avoid future criminal activity. Status offenses are often handled through diversion programs or community-based services rather than through the formal juvenile justice system.
Learn more about juvenile at:
https://brainly.com/question/25821714
#SPJ1
WHAT IS PRIME OVERHEAD COST?
How does the judicial branch examine the actions of administrative agencies?
Answer:
Federal courts routinely uphold very broad delegations of authority. When reviewing administrative agency actions, courts ask whether the agency afforded those under its jurisdiction due process of law as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.
Does this help?
How is Congress able to limit the president's ability to influence federal
legislation?
Answer: Congress can override a veto by passing the act by a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate. (Usually an act is passed with a simple majority.) This check prevents the President from blocking an act when significant support for it exists
The U.S. Constitution establishes a system of checks and balances among the three branches of government: the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. Congress, which is the legislative branch, has several powers that can limit the president's ability to influence federal legislation:
The power to make laws: Congress has the authority to pass laws, and the president cannot make laws on his or her own. The president can suggest legislation, but ultimately, it is up to Congress to pass it.
The power of the purse: Congress controls the federal budget and can use its power of the purse to limit the president's ability to influence legislation. For example, Congress can refuse to fund a particular program or policy that the president supports.
The power to override vetoes: If the president vetoes a bill passed by Congress, Congress can override the veto with a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.
The power of impeachment: Congress has the power to impeach and remove the president from office for "high crimes and misdemeanors." This power serves as a check on the president's behavior and can limit his or her ability to influence legislation.
The power to investigate: Congress has the authority to investigate the executive branch, including the president, and can use this power to uncover information that can limit the president's ability to influence legislation.
Overall, Congress has a range of powers that can limit the president's ability to influence federal legislation, which helps to maintain the system of checks and balances established by the U.S. Constitution.