a field of law that attempts to limit the ability of oligopolists to collude and restrict competition is called: question 30 options: a) product safety policy. b) excise tax policy. c) antitrust policy. d) fuel efficiency standards. previous page next page

Answer:

the answer of this question is that A)They should go to the local government board meeting to plead their case. i hope it will help you

Answer:

Organize your campaign and ads

Build a case and communicate with local government, your nearest government building such as the county house.

Determine if speed humps are right for your street, and what it may cause negatively and positively  

Then Get your local government to act

Explanation: as such said above

Answer: because the mustang is on the right so they have the right away

Explanation:

Answer:

The mustang has the right of way because they got the the stop sign first

Explanation:

Answer:

B is your answer

Explanation:

Answer:

Magna Carta, which means 'The Great Charter', is one of the most important documents in history as it established the principle that everyone is subject to the law, even the king, and guarantees the rights of individuals, the right to justice and the right to a fair trial

The fourth Amendment is a US legislation that is aimed at prohibiting unreasonable searches and seizures. Below you can read more about the Fourth Amendment.

    This is a United states legislation that protects citizens in their houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Framers vision of the fourth Amendment was aimed at guaranteeing property rights to American Citizens just as they were guaranteed those rights by England.

  The Fourth Amendment protects against State and Federal Intrusion because it wants citizens to feel safe, enjoy privacy and freedom in their property free from government intrusion.

   The Fourth Amendment has changed overtime because at the time it was established, it only guaranteed right to privacy in your home. However, in this day and Age, it has been extended to anyplace where a citizen expects privacy such as your car, or the telephone booth.

   Search, seizure Privacy and reasonable can be defined under the fourth amendment as that which is only justifiable under the Law.

Learn more about the Fourth Amendment at https://brainly.com/question/4289259

#SPJ1

A true statement must have an element of validity. The statements is true is Never carry more than one caliber or gauge of ammunition at the same time.

A statement is simply known too be an assertion that something is or is not the case.

It is very important to carry only the correct ammunition for the shotgun.  If the wrong ammunition is supplied, it can cause an explosion, injuring or possibly killing yourself and any bystanders.

Learn more from

https://brainly.com/question/25041383

The Law of Demand implies that the quantity demanded of a commodity will decrease as its price increases,

According to the Law of Demand, when all other demand-influencing factors stay constant, a commodity's quantity desired will drop as its price rises and vice versa. In other words, the amount that customers desire and the cost of an item or service are inversely related. It is an essential principle of economics that customers' actions alter in reaction to price fluctuations. Typically, it is represented graphically as a downward-sloping demand curve, with the amount desired shown on the horizontal axis and the price of the commodity or service on the vertical axis.

It is predicated on idea that customers are rational and would want to get the most utility or enjoyment out of buying products and using services. When an item or service's price rises, it becomes relatively more costly in comparison to other goods or services, and customers may decide to demand fewer of them in favor of more affordable alternatives.

Read more about Law of Demand on:

https://brainly.com/question/30703626

#SPJ4

The key difference between criminology and criminal justice is that criminology focuses on the study of criminal behavior and its causes, while criminal justice involves the study of the legal system and its processes for dealing with crime.

1. Criminology is a branch of sociology that examines the nature, extent, causes, control, and prevention of criminal behavior. It aims to understand the reasons behind criminal activities and to develop strategies to prevent or reduce crime. Criminologists may study different types of crimes, such as white-collar crime, organized crime, and violent crime, as well as the effectiveness of crime prevention programs and policies.
2. Criminal justice, on the other hand, is the study of the legal system and its processes for dealing with crime. It covers various aspects of the system, including law enforcement, the courts, and corrections. Criminal justice professionals focus on the implementation and administration of laws, policies, and procedures that aim to ensure public safety, uphold the rule of law, and maintain a fair and just society.
In contrast, criminology and criminal justice also have some similarities. Both fields aim to reduce crime and maintain social order, and they often work together to achieve these goals. Professionals in both fields collaborate to develop effective crime prevention strategies, share information, and improve the overall effectiveness of the criminal justice system.
Criminology and criminal justice are distinct but interconnected fields that focus on different aspects of crime and its prevention. Criminology is concerned with understanding the causes of criminal behavior, while criminal justice focuses on the administration and enforcement of laws and policies to address crime. Both fields share a common goal of reducing crime and promoting a safe and just society.

For more information on criminology kindly visit to

https://brainly.com/question/28587242

#SPJ11

It is true that the brutal harassment of Baptist ministers and other incidents caught the attention of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison who sympathized with the Baptists' plight.

Harassment refers to any unwanted behavior that is hostile or offensive and that can occur in a variety of contexts, such as the workplace, schools, online, or in public spaces.

In colonial Virginia, the established Anglican Church held a dominant position, and dissenting religious groups such as the Baptists faced harassment and persecution.

Baptist ministers were often arrested, fined, and even beaten for preaching without a license or for their non-conformist beliefs.

Thus, the given statement is true.

For more details regarding harassment, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11375821

#SPJ1

i think that the listing guy earned 60k

The amount of commission that the listing broker earned from the property that was listed for $640,000 but sold for $580,000 was $29,000.

A listing broker is a real estate agent that lists properties for sale.  The listing broker can be differentiated from the selling broker.

The selling broker works with the buyer of the real estate property while the listing broker works for the interest of the property owner.

The important question is, is the listing broker paid a commission based on the listing price or selling price?  The listing broker's commission is based on the selling price and not the listing price.

The list price of property = $640,000

Sales price = $580,000

Commission paid by the seller = 5%

Listing broker's commission = $29,000 ($580,000 x 5%)

Thus, the listing broker earned a commission of $29,000.

Learn more about listing broker's commissions at https://brainly.com/question/14838861

The court decision of California v. Ciraolo (1986) established the legal standard of "open view doctrine," which permits law enforcement officials to conduct warrantless searches if the object of the search is readily visible from a public vantage point.

The court decision of California v. Ciraolo (1986) established the legal standard for aerial surveillance by law enforcement. In this case, the defendant, Mr. Ciraolo, was growing marijuana in his backyard, which was surrounded by a six-foot fence. The police received an anonymous tip about the marijuana and conducted a flyover of Mr. Ciraolo's property using an airplane at an altitude of 1,000 feet. From this vantage point, they were able to see the marijuana plants growing in Mr. Ciraolo's backyard.

Mr. Ciraolo was charged with cultivating marijuana, but his defense argued that the police had conducted an illegal search by using aerial surveillance without a warrant. The case ultimately made its way to the United States Supreme Court, which held that the use of aerial surveillance did not constitute a search under the Fourth Amendment and therefore did not require a warrant.

The Court established that individuals do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy from observations made by police from public airspace. In other words, if an individual is doing something that can be seen by anyone from a public vantage point (such as a street or public airspace), then they cannot reasonably expect that their activity is private.

The legal standard established by California v. Ciraolo is known as the "open view doctrine" or "plain view doctrine," which holds that law enforcement can use aerial surveillance to observe activities that are open to the public from a lawful vantage point without violating the Fourth Amendment. This standard has been applied in subsequent cases involving aerial surveillance and has been expanded to include other forms of surveillance technology, such as drones.

To know more about open view doctrine:

https://brainly.com/question/31558574

£SPJ11

Answer:

being under pressure could be one

Explanation:

Answer:69

Explanation:6969696969

Answer:

United state of Representative.

Explanation:

I believe this because they allow Discipline and Punishment.

If wrong do not give me points (:

Answer; yes you can say that

Explanation: its basically unemployment benefits

Answer:

To find the slope of this line we need to get the line into slope-intercept form (y = mx + b), which means we need to solve for y: The slope of the line 4x – 5y = 12 is m = 4/5. Therefore, the slope of every line parallel to this line would have to be m = 4/5. Two lines are perpendicular if .

Explanation:

Hopefully this helps! I'm not super good at mathematics, I'm in 8th grade and in 7th grade math..but I checked my answer online. :)

Explanation:

Proportional Representation Deputy?

The professionals who use the tools and methods of their profession to study words and language related to issues of the law are called legal luminaries.

A professional lawyer or a legal luminary is a professional or expert who is:

A lawyer can be addressed as:

Thus, the professionals who use the tools and methods of their profession to study words and language related to issues of the law are called legal luminaries.

Learn more about the legal profession at https://brainly.com/question/16040577

#SPJ1

Answer:

These professionals use the tools and methods of their profession to study words and language related to issues of the law:

.

Explanation:

Edge 2022 Unit Test

The outcome of the case will depend on the specific facts of the case, the state's laws of comparative negligence laws and contributory negligence laws, and how the court interprets and applies those laws.

The outcome of the case will depend on the state's laws regarding comparative negligence and seat belt laws. In some states, comparative negligence laws allow for the reduction of damages awarded to a plaintiff who was partially at fault for their injuries.

In other states, failure to wear a seat belt may be considered contributory negligence, which could result in the plaintiff being barred from recovering damages.

If the state follows comparative negligence laws, the court may apportion fault between Joe and Mary and reduce Mary's damages accordingly. For example, if Mary was found to be 20% at fault for her injuries due to her failure to wear a seat belt, her damages may be reduced by 20%.

If the state follows contributory negligence laws, Mary may be barred from recovering any damages if her failure to wear a seat belt is deemed to have contributed to her injuries.

To know more about comparative negligence laws:

https://brainly.com/question/29829593

#SPJ4

In United States v Verdugo Urquidez, the supreme court held that constitutional protections cannot be obtained in U.S. Government actions against foreign nationals on foreign soil.

In United States v Verdugo Urquidez, a Mexican national was arrested and his property was searched by U.S. agents. He was then brought to the United States to face drug charges. The defendant contended that his Fourth Amendment rights of the Constitution had been breached by the search and seizure of his house in Mexico, as well as by the search of his vehicle in the United States, without a warrant.

The Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution does not cover illegal searches and seizures carried out by US government officials on foreign soil and that the protections under it do not extend to foreign nationals outside the United States. As a result, the search did not breach the Fourth Amendment.

Henceforth the Supreme Court emphasized in United States v Verdugo Urquidez, that constitutional protections cannot be obtained in U.S. Government actions against foreign nationals on foreign soil.  

Learn more about U.S. constitutional protections at: https://brainly.in/question/5984704

#SPJ11

In the Kincaid v. Gibson case, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the students' right to distribute the yearbook based largely on the fact that the creation of the yearbook was a recognized part of the school curriculum.

In 1986, a case was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky known as Kincaid v. Gibson. This case was brought against the school officials in the Laurel County School System by three high school students. The students had worked on the school yearbook and wanted to include an article that criticized the school administration for not providing enough support to the school's arts program. The principal of the school refused to allow the article to be published in the yearbook, citing the school's policy that forbade any negative comments about school officials. However, the students disagreed with the principal's decision and filed a lawsuit claiming that their First Amendment rights had been violated.

The court believed that the students had a right to express their views on a matter of public concern, even if those views were critical of school officials. In summary, the court ruled that the school officials had violated the students' First Amendment rights by censoring their article. This case was a landmark ruling that established the rights of students to express their views in school-sponsored publications.

Learn more about Lawsuit

https://brainly.com/question/30392587

#SPJ11

In the Kincaid v. Gibson case, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the student's right to distribute the yearbook. The court's decision was largely based on the fact that the creation of the yearbook was an exercise of student expression and fell under the protection of the First Amendment.

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the right to freedom of speech, including freedom of expression. In this case, the court recognized that the yearbook was a form of student expression and therefore protected by the First Amendment. The court understood that students have the right to express their views and ideas through creative projects like yearbooks. It is important to note that the court's ruling was specific to this case and may not apply universally. However, it set a precedent for recognizing student expression rights in similar situations. The court's decision supports the idea that schools should allow students to engage in creative projects like yearbooks, as long as they are not disruptive or harmful.

To know more about the First amendment, visit

https://brainly.com/question/17455428

#SPJ11

Numerous federal and state laws have been passed in the field of law known as consumer protection in an effort to protect consumers from the risks present in the marketplace. Three specific consumer activities that have come under the purview of such legislation are as follows:

1. Purchases by consumers: This refers to the sale of products and services, as well as real estate, for private, domestic, or familial use. For instance, written warranties offered by vendors of consumer goods are covered under the Federal Warranty Protection. On the other hand, new automobile buyers have rights under lemon laws.

2. The use of consumer credit: It covers all credit agreements for purchases of commodities, services, or real estate made for private, domestic, or familial use. The Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act (FCCPA) is applicable to a number of legal protections, such as banning discrimination in credit-granting.

3. Credit Remedies: There are many different types of creditor remedies, including wage assignments, garnishments, security interests in property, and debt collection techniques. Garnishment is only legal with a court order, and wage assignments guard against termination from employment. The credit card bill of rights places restrictions on credit card users' interest rates, notifications, payments, and penalties, and fair reporting forbids the use of inaccurate or out-of-date information in consumer reports. Protecting consumers from dishonest and misleading business practices, as well as faulty goods and services, is the responsibility of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and other government consumer protection organizations, such as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

To know more about the purpose of Consumer Rights:

https://brainly.com/question/27317480

#SPJ11

Answer:

answer: 3. Gross physical evidence is easily seen, while trace evidence is very small

Explanation:

Evidence

The statement 'The man's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon; he must have shot the gun' is an example of reasoning to support a claim.

An example of reasoning to back up a claim is the statement, "The man's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon; he must have shot the gun." It establishes a logical link between the conclusion (the man fired the gun) and the evidence (fingerprints on the weapon).

This line of thinking is predicated on the notion that the man's fingerprints prove that he had a direct hand in the weapon and consequently the crime. It makes use of the idea of cause and effect and asserts that the fingerprint evidence is strong proof of the man's involvement in the crime.

To know more about evidence here

brainly.com/question/31812026

#SPJ2

Environmental and social factors do have an impact on crime. However, the factors that have the greatest influence are psychological.

A crime is a term to refer to a voluntary wrongful or reprehensible action that according to the law must be reprimanded and prohibited.

When a person commits a crime many factors influence him to carry out this act, some of this influence is:

According to the above, it can be inferred that of the factors that influence a crime, the most important is the psychological factor because it has a greater impact on the individual's thinking.

Learn more about crime in: https://brainly.com/question/15691073

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Answer: false

Explanation:

At the turn of the century, many drugs were made illegal when a mood of temperance swept the nation.

Answer:

A. injury and at the time of the suit.

Explanation:

A corporation can be defined as a corporate organization that has facilities and owns or controls assets used for the production of goods and services in at least one country other than its headquarter (home office) located in its home country.

This ultimately implies that, a corporation is a corporate organization that owns or controls its business in two or more countries.

One of the advantage of a corporation is that, owners have limited liability for debt to the extent to which they have invested and as such are not personally liable for some of the debt owed by corporation.

A derivative suit can be defined as a lawsuit that's brought forward by a shareholder on behalf of a corporation, to either defend or enforce a legal right (claim) against a third party such as a director or executive officer in the corporation.

Hence, to bring a derivative suit to a court of competent jurisdiction, a shareholder must own stock at the time of the injury and at the time of the suit.