The mistake is subject to the harmless mistake rule type of test, based on the inquiry in this example.
In India, who is a prosecutor?
Public prosecutors are govt advocates in charge of a trial, appeal, and other court processes. As a Prosecutor's Office, you will aide the court by gathering all pertinent data regarding the case with assistance of the police.
What gives a prosecutor such power?
They have had the power to keep people out of prison - or not. They have the authority to offer or refuse a plea bargain. Prosecutors have sole discretion in making charging decisions as well as plea bargain offers. If a defendant chooses to go to trial rather than plead guilty, some prosecutors will seek a longer sentence.
To know more about Prosecutor visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27982191
#SPJ4
HURRY PLEASE You pay $38.76 for a phone case, a selfie-stick, and 2 USB drives. The phone case costs $14.29 and the selfie-stick costs $10.49. The USB drives cost the same amount. How much does each USB drive cost
Answer:
$0.78 i think
Explanation:
Answer:
12.235
Explanation:
BECAUSE
conditions precedent, conditions subsequent and nominal conditions are the three types of conditions allowed in a contract. (true or false)
conditions precedent, conditions subsequent and nominal conditions are the three types of conditions allowed in a contract.FALSE.
While conditions precedent and conditions subsequent are two types of conditions that can be included in a contract, nominal conditions are not a recognized type of condition in contract law.
True. In a contract, there are three types of conditions: conditions precedent, conditions subsequent, and nominal conditions. Conditions precedent must be met before the contract's performance obligations become effective. Conditions subsequent, on the other hand, may cause the contract's obligations to end if certain events occur. Nominal conditions are minor stipulations that do not affect the main purpose of the contract.
To know more about precedent visit:
brainly.com/question/26903289
#SPJ11
School Zoning laws (Drug Laws) have had no impact on incarceration rates
True
False
False, School Zoning laws (Drug Laws) have had no impact on incarceration rates.
School zoning laws, which are designed to address drug offenses in certain areas surrounding schools, have had an impact on incarceration rates. While it is difficult to isolate the precise impact of any single policy or law on incarceration rates, there is evidence to suggest that school zoning laws targeting drug offenses have contributed to the increase in incarceration rates, particularly in certain communities.
School zoning laws typically impose enhanced penalties for drug offenses committed within a certain distance of a school, such as mandatory minimum sentences or enhanced sentencing guidelines. These laws aim to protect children and maintain safe environments around educational institutions. However, critics argue that these laws disproportionately target marginalized communities and contribute to the over-incarceration of individuals for non-violent drug offenses.
Studies have shown that school zoning laws have resulted in a significant increase in the number of drug-related arrests and subsequent incarcerations, particularly in low-income neighborhoods and communities of color. These laws have been criticized for perpetuating racial disparities in the criminal justice system and for their limited effectiveness in deterring drug offenses.
Therefore, it is inaccurate to claim that school zoning laws targeting drug offenses have had no impact on incarceration rates.
For more question on Drug Laws visit:
https://brainly.com/question/20630252
#SPJ8
Which is these is most common likely contribute to a sexually hostile work environment
Answer: b
Explanation:
Answer:
Actions that can contribute to a hostile environment include sexual assaults or offensive touching of employees, demanding sexual favors from subordinates, and sexually oriented statements, comments, jokes, or pictures that are intended to create an intimidating or offensive workplace.
What is the purpose of the statement of understanding with a medicare application?
Use your quarterly Medicare Summary Notice to keep track of the care you receive — and to help fight fraud. A Medicare Summary Notice (MSN) is the statement that shows all the services or supplies billed to Medicare on your account, how much of the bill Medicare paid, and how much you still owe the provider and/or supplier.
The purpose of the statement of understanding with a Medicare application is to ensure that the applicant acknowledges and comprehends the rules and regulations associated with the Medicare program.
A Medicare application is a form used by individuals in the United States to apply for Medicare health insurance benefits, which primarily cover people aged 65 and older and those with certain disabilities.
The statement of understanding is typically included in the application process and serves as a declaration where the applicant confirms their awareness and comprehension of Medicare rules, coverage options, costs, enrollment periods, and their rights and responsibilities as a beneficiary.
This statement helps ensure that applicants have informed consent and are aware of the terms and conditions before obtaining Medicare benefits.
Learn more about Medicare application here:
https://brainly.com/question/32295663
#SPJ6
Which United States governing body best reflects the “representative” part of being a representative democracy?
the executive branch
the judicial branch
the legislative branch
the international branch
Answer:
the judicial branch
Explanation:
The United States governing body that best reflects the “representative” part of being a representative democracy is C. the legislative branch.
What is representative democracy?The concept of representative democracy suggests that the populace participates indirectly in the decision-making process of the government through the choice of their elected representatives.
The elected representatives meet and make decisions for the entire population. An example of a representative democratic branch of government is Congress or the legislature.
Thus, the United States governing body that best reflects the “representative” part of being a representative democracy is C. the legislative branch.
Learn more about representative democracy at https://brainly.com/question/393401
#SPJ1
You are approaching an intersection and are preparing to turn right with a green light. You should slow down, signal your turn and
Answer: look both sides before taking the turn
Explanation:
Criminal charges made against an accused person and put in writing prior to their being put on trial, is called what?
Answer:
Indictment.
Explanation:
John sold a pair of skis to Bob, making no specific warranties or promises of any kind other than letting Bob examine and try them. In fact, John did not own the skis; he had only rented them. When the true owner claimed them, Bob demanded his money back. John defended his actions by stating that he had made no warranty of any kind.
 is a spouse responsible for the other spouses credit card debt when they die
Nationwide, _____ and _____ are the most frequent targets of corporal punishment in schools.
Nationwide females and African-Americans are the most frequent targets of corporal punishment in schools.
What is Punishment?Punishment is the response for some wrong doing. In a school punishments are common when pupil makes severe mistakes, pupil are warned and if they repeat the mistake.
Corporal punishment is the punishment in which the punished is hurt physically, this is generally not allowed in schools, but if this happens the most frequent target are females and African-Americans.
Teachers should not be allowed for this as this type of punishment demotivates the student.
Learn more about Punishment at https://brainly.com/question/27295567
#SPJ1
QUESTION 13
What is the correct order in which a jury trial is conducted?
O a. opening statements-jury selection--defendant's case--plaintiff's
O b.jury selection--opening statements--defendant's case-plaintiff's
b
OC. opening statements--jury selection-plaintiff's case--defendant's
O d. jury selection--opening statements--plaintiff's case--defendant's
What is the correct order in which a jury trail is conducted
In a law court, there is a correct order in which jury trials are carried out.
The correct order in which a jury trial is conducted is:
D. Jury selection--opening statements--plaintiff's case--defendant's.
Jury TrialIn US courts, jury trial is usually made up of 6-12 people. The trials are made public but the deliberations of jury are private.
In the jury trial, the judge might introduce him/herself,. Then he will go further to tell the jury the name of the case.
The work of the attorneys will be to give their opening statements. Just after the opening statements has been made, the plaintiff will begin by examining its witnesses. The defendant speaks.
Learn more about jury trial on https://brainly.com/question/2016950
scott is a rude person . this tells us that his character does not include trait honesty, generosity,loyalty or politeness
Answer:
Politeness
Explanation:
If someone is rude, they are generally considered unpolite. This does not speak to their loyalty, honesty, or generosity.
Please, I'm giving out huge points if someone solves it <:(
o What is the significance of the Executive branch on the national level? Give examples in detail of how they impact our daily lives.
o What is the significance of the State level of government? Give detailed examples of
how they impact our daily lives.
o What is the significance of the local level of government? Give detailed examples of how they impact our daily lives.
a national vote initiated by the government on a particular policy issue is commonly known as a
A national vote initiated by the government on a particular policy issue is commonly known as a referendum.
In a referendum, citizens are given the opportunity to vote either in favor of or against a proposed policy or law. Referendums can be held on a range of issues, from constitutional amendments to controversial social issues. They are often used to gauge public opinion and to legitimize government actions. The outcome of a referendum can have significant implications for the government and the country as a whole. It is important for citizens to educate themselves on the issue at hand and to participate in the democratic process by voting in the referendum.
To learn more about vote, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15006756
#SPJ11
awarding of political jobs or contracts based on partisan ties instead of merit or expertise
The term for awarding political jobs or contracts based on partisan ties instead of merit or expertise is called patronage.
Patronage is the distribution of government positions, contracts, and other benefits to individuals based on their political support rather than their qualifications or merit.
Patronage is the act of giving jobs, contracts, and other benefits to supporters and friends of a political party or individual rather than considering their qualifications or merit. It's a form of corruption that has long been associated with politics.
Patronage is frequently used to reward political allies, supporters, and campaign donors with jobs, contracts, and other perks. As a result, patronage is often viewed as a way to gain and maintain political power, which can lead to inefficiency and waste in government.
awarding of political jobs or contracts based on partisan ties instead of merit or expertise is?
Learn more about political https://brainly.com/question/29979765
#SPJ11
After the st valentine's day massacre, the fbi increased resources to get at the mob bosses in chicago, working hard to shut down their organizations. What was it about this event that most likely spurred authorities into action?.
Authorities were most likely spurred into action by the sheer number of innocent bystanders who were injured during the incident.
What is meant by bystanders?
A chance A person is said to be a spectator when they are present but not actively participating in a situation or event: the shooting hurt bystanders.
a person who attends an event but does not participate; also known as a bystander or observer. A bystander is someone who observes an action from a distance without participating. A person who unintentionally enters a store as it is being robbed is known as a bystander.
The inability to assist someone in need when other people are around is known as the "bystander effect." According to research, even with a parking brake.
To know more about bystanders:
brainly.com/question/29347561
#SPJ4
What does bloodstain pattern analysis tell us in regard to the victim and suspect?
Answer:
Information that may be gained with bloodstain pattern analysis include, for example, the position of the individual when the blood was deposited (sitting, standing, etc.), the relative position of individuals at the time of bloodshed, the possible type of weapon used as well as possible mechanisms that could have ..Which person is a victim of identity theft?
Suzie, whose e-mail was stolen and used to apply for a credit card from a major retailer
Michael, whose credit score was stolen and used to make a down payment on a home
Pam, whose smartphone was stolen and used to make a mortgage payment
Thomas, whose credit card information was stolen and maxed out at a jewelry store
Answer:
thomas
Explanation:
just did test
Thomas is a victim of identity theft because his credit card information was stolen and maxed out at a jewelry store.
What is identity theft?Identity theft happens when someone commits fraud or another crime using another person's personal information—such as their name, identification number, or credit card number—without that person's consent. In 1964, the phrase "identity theft" was first used. Since that time, both the U.K. and the U.S. have statutory definitions of identity theft that include the theft of personally identifiable information.
Identity theft purposefully utilizes someone else's identity as a technique to acquire financial advantages or obtain credit and other benefits, and potentially to create other person's disadvantages or loss. When someone's identity is stolen, bad things can happen to them, especially if they are wrongly accused of being the offender.
Therefore, Thomas is an victim of identity theft.
To learn more about identity theft, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29898436
#SPJ7
Imagine you are a state judge running for reelection and are challenged by a popular lawyer in town, who is known as a champion for the poor. The latest poll indicated that you were five percentage points behind your opponent. A local labor union with 20,000 due-paying members comes to you to offer not only large donations, but also actual union member votes, which would assure your victory. You know that the same union has filed a lawsuit in your court requesting that the current state law governing the amount of political contributions by labor unions be lifted.
Would you accept their support?
If yes, how would you justify your decision ethically?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
This is not a bribe as they are not asking for you to vote in their favor. You can take it without feeling guilty as they know that this could be highly illegal if they try and sway you over.
Autonomy in teams means Group of answer choices teams have no supervision. a perception that the team's task is important and worthwhile. exercising freedom, independence, and discretion when working in teams. team decisions must be approved by those higher up in the organizational hierarchy.
Autonomy in teams means exercising freedom, independence, and discretion when working in teams.
The correct answer is option C.
Giving your employees the ability to choose how, when, and where they work is what autonomy in the workplace entails.
An autonomous team manages autonomously with little supervision or interference. It makes its own decisions, including how to handle everyday chores and responsibilities, as well as how to create work processes to execute those tasks.
A flat autonomous organisation, as opposed to a typical hierarchical structure, is seen to be more beneficial because team members build on each other's strengths while compensating for flaws.
Team autonomy promotes self-starting rather than passive participation, resulting in an open interchange of ideas and perspectives, healthy competition, and seamless collaboration and communication.
The question is incomplete. The complete question is:
Autonomy in teams means
a. teams have no supervision
b. a perception that the team's task is important and worthwhile
c. exercising freedom, independence, and discretion when working in teams
d. team decisions must be approved by those higher up in the organizational hierarchy
To know more about team autonomy, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31939566
#SPJ4
what is RA 6675 The Generic Act of 1988
In the Duma there are 1600 delegates, who have formed 16000 committees of 80 people each. Prove that one can find two committees having no fewer than four common members.
The concept here is the Pigeon-hole principle, which states that if n items are put into m containers, with n > m, then at least one container must contain more than one item.
The pigeon hole principle is one of the simplest but most useful ideas in mathematics and can save us here. There are 16,000 committees, each with 80 members. So in all committees, there are 1,280,000 different committee members.
Since there are only 1,600 people and 1,280,000 members, at least one committee member (let's call him Bob) is on at least 800 committees. But as with the classics, we end up with a contradiction. Suppose no commission pair has four members in common, so at most 3.
Check out the 800+ committees Bob serves on. Besides Bob, each of Bob's committees has at most 2 people in common. Bob's first committee has 79 other people. His second committee has at least 77 other people (because maybe 2 have already been counted). In the third at least 75 and so on.
According to Bob's 40th committee, we say that there are at least 79+77+75+...+1 people besides Bob.
But 1+2+3+…+79=80⋅79/2=40⋅79, and 2+4+6+…+78=2(1+2+3+…+39)=2(39⋅40/2)=39⋅40.
So 1+3+5+…+79=40×79−40×39=40×40=1600, so there are at least 1600 people on Bob's committees besides Bob! It's impossible because there are only 1600 people! We have reached our contradiction and finished the proof.
To know more about the Pigeon-hole principle,
brainly.com/question/29889928
#SPJ4
Who is Eilyn González
Answer:
Eileen is a 51 Pegasi b Fellow at the Cornell Center for Astrophysics and Planetary Sciences. She uses observational and theoretical techniques to understand the atmospheres of low-mass stars, brown dwarfs and directly-imaged exoplanets.
Explanation:
What rule allows local prosecutors to charge Keith with first-degree murder? If you were the prosecutor, discuss why you think you'd be successful prosecuting using this rule.
Hello. You did not report the case Keith is involved in, which makes it impossible for your question to be answered accurately. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
Generally speaking, a prosecutor can use the felony murder rule to prosecute someone as possibly guilty of a first-degree murder. This is because the felony murder rule states that there are murders that occur accidentally, or during dangerous activities, and these murders are classified as first-degree murder.
At defendant's murder trial, Defendant calls Witness as his first witness to testify that Defendant has a reputation in their community as a peaceable and truthful person. The prosecutor objects on the ground that Witness's testimony would constitute improper character evidence. The court should
A. admit the testimony as to peaceableness, but exclude the testimony as to truthfulness.
B. admit the testimony as to truthfulness, but exclude the testimony as to peaceableness.
C. admit the testimony as to both character traits.
D. exclude the testimony as to both character traits.
The court should exclude the testimony as to both character traits to figure out.
In a murder trial, the general rule is that evidence regarding a defendant's character traits is not admissible unless it becomes relevant due to the defendant's claim of self-defense or the prosecution's introduction of evidence attacking the defendant's character. In this scenario, the defendant is attempting to present evidence of their reputation as a peaceable and truthful person through the testimony of a witness from their community.
However, the prosecutor objects, arguing that such testimony would constitute improper character evidence. The court should uphold the objection and exclude the testimony as to both character traits. The reason is that evidence of a defendant's general character, whether it is peaceableness or truthfulness, is not relevant to proving or disproving the specific charge of murder.
To learn more about testimony click here : brainly.com/question/30358047
#SPJ11
In what type of weather do collision occur
Alison, a data analyst and software engineer, worked for Dellis, Inc. When she joined Dellis, she signed an employment contract. In that employment contract, among other provisions, was an arbitration clause, which read:
"any disputes arising out of this contract of employment are subject to arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association."
During her work for Dellis, Alison created a software program that would better track Dellis’ clients. Alison attempted to register for a patent to the program, claiming personal ownership in the rights to the software. Dellis learns Alison is applying for patent protection and claims the program was created as a result of Alison's work for the company and therefore it belongs to the company.
Alison files a lawsuit in Court. She is requesting that the Court enter a Declaratory Judgment--essentially an order that she is the rightful owner of the patent associated with the program.
Dellis immediately files a motion to dismiss Alison’s lawsuit. Should the court hear Alison’s lawsuit. Why or why not?
Any disputes arising out of this contract of employment are subject to arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association. Was an arbitration clause.
What is employment?In most cases, employment refers to the status of having a paid job—of being employed. Employing someone is paying them to work. Employees are employed by an employer. Employment can also refer to the act of hiring individuals, as in We're trying to hire more women.
The term employment contract may include an employment arbitration clause, which means you agreed not to pursue any legal action against your employer in court. Instead, any disputes that you have with your employer must be settled through a process known as arbitration
Therefore, Thus option (A) is correct.
Learn more about employment here:
https://brainly.com/question/1361941
#SPJ1
It’s always a good idea to shop around for the insurance that’s going to give you the _____ for the least amount of money.
A. most coverage
B. best free perks
C. easiest sign-up process
D. largest policy
Answer:
I would feel bad if I gave the wrong answer. So here's this to help. Sry.
Explanation:
Shopping around for insurance is one of the best ways to ensure that you're paying the best rate based on your circumstances. It gives you the ability to compare the rate offered by your current insurance provider with other providers – to properly assess your rate.
Always shop about for the insurance that will provide you with the most coverage for the least amount of money. i.e. Option A.
What is the aim of a policy of insurance?
The section of an insurance policy defines the insured's and insurer's general requirements on subjects such as loss reporting and settlement, property assessment, and other issues.
Its goal is to lower financial risk and make unexpected losses more bearable. It does so by paying a professional insurer a small, predetermined fee—an insurance premium—in consideration for the risk of a substantial loss and a promise to pay in the event of such a loss.
For more information about Insurance refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/989103
#SPJ2
In a perfectly competitive market, the seller is the
Explanation:
There are a large number of buyers and sellers in a perfectly competitive market. The sellers are small firms, instead of large corporations capable of controlling prices through supply adjustments. They sell products with minimal differences in capabilities, features, and pricing. Brainliest pls