Answers
Related Questions
introduction to the fiber analysis webquest activity find 5 examples of each type of fiber and give a brief
Answers
Law enforcement organizations all across the world employ fiber analysis, a technique for locating and studying fibers, to gather evidence during an investigation.
Law enforcement organizations also utilize fiber analysis to pinpoint suspects around the crime site. When a suspect or victim is in close proximity to one another, fibers can transfer. Fiber transfers can also happen during break-ins when the intruder's fibers get entangled. Since fiber evidence is a sort of trace evidence, it will probably be very minute, maybe even microscopic. Due of its lower reliability than DNA, this technology is typically not utilized to actually identify a criminal in an inquiry.
Three basic methods for fiber examination include UV-Vis MSP, polarized light microscopy, and FTIR. Different kinds of microscopes RTF-are used in WE-R polarized light microscopy and UV-V is MSP to examine samples.
For such more question on fiber .
https://brainly.com/question/24823406
#SPJ4
The Jordan Keys law firm represented the Greater Southeast Community Hospital of Washington, D.C., in a medical malpractice suit against the hospital. The hospital was self-insured for the first $1,000,000 of liability and the St. Paul Insurance Co. provided excess coverage up to $4,000,000. The law firm was owed $67,000 for its work on the malpractice suit when the hospital went into bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court ordered the law firm to release its files on the case to St. Paul to defend under the excess coverage insurance, and the Jordan Keys firm sued St. Paul for its legal fees of $67,000 expended prior to the bankruptcy under an “implied-in-fact contract” because the insurance company would have the benefit of all of its work. Decide. [Jordan Keys v. St. Paul Fire, 870 A.2d 58 (D.C.)] what is the answer?
Answers
The court decided in favor of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.
What led the court to this decision to decide in favor of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company?The court found that there was no implied-in-fact contract between Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.
The court found that the hospital and Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP had an express contract requiring the hospital to pay for legal work rendered by Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP. The court found that an implied contract cannot stand in the face of an express one.
Read more about court case here;
https://brainly.com/question/30552468
#SPJ1
The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.
Price in Dollars
18
16
14
12
10
8
4
2
10
20
40
Quantity Supplied
→
50
What does the graph show about the relationship
between a product and its price?
O As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes
up.
O As the amount of a product goes down, the price
goes up.
O As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes
up.
O As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes
up.
Answers
The relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.
What is the relationship between a product and its price?The theory of price states that, the price is affected by various factors in the market and these factors can influence the price of the product.
The factors may be as follows -
Income of the consumers.Price of substitute goods.Price of complementary goods.Taste and preferences of consumers.Thus, the relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.
Learn more about price at:
brainly.com/question/26075805
#SPJ1
Full Question:
Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:
The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.
What does the graph show about the relationship between a product and its price?
As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes up.
As the amount of a product goes down, the price goes up.
As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up.
As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes up.
See attached image.
Define the elements of the Search and Seizure Amendment and explain what they mean.
Determine why the founding fathers included a provision in the Bill of Rights pertaining to search and seizure.
Consider DUI checkpoints. Should DUI checkpoints be legal given the provisions of search and seizure as defined by the Bill of Rights?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The elements of this amendment are:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effectsAgainst unreasonable searches and seizuresShall not be violatedWarrants shall not be issued, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.The founding fathers included this provision in the Bill of Rights because they believed that individual liberties, including privacy, were important and needed protection from the government.
Regarding DUI checkpoints, the legality of these checkpoints is a matter of debate and has been challenged in court. The Supreme Court has ruled that DUI checkpoints are constitutional as long as they are reasonable and minimally intrusive. However, this is a complex issue and the specific circumstances of each checkpoint must be evaluated to determine whether it violates the Fourth Amendment's provisions on search and seizure.
Example:
Let's consider the following example to understand the Fourth Amendment's provisions on search and seizure.
Imagine that a police officer suspects that a particular person is involved in drug trafficking. The officer wants to search the person's house for evidence. However, without a warrant, the search would be considered an unreasonable one and would violate the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches.
To obtain a warrant, the officer must show probable cause that the person is involved in criminal activity and that evidence of that activity can be found in the person's house. The warrant must also describe the place to be searched and the things to be seized. In this case, the warrant would specify the address of the person's house and the items the officer is looking for, such as drugs, drug paraphernalia, or money related to drug sales.
If the warrant is properly obtained, the search is considered reasonable and the evidence found can be used in court. However, if the warrant is not based on probable cause or does not meet the requirements of the Fourth Amendment, the evidence found during the search may be considered inadmissible in court.
In the context of DUI checkpoints, a similar analysis would be performed to determine whether the checkpoint is reasonable and minimally intrusive, and whether it meets the Fourth Amendment's requirements. The specific circumstances, such as the location, time, and duration of the checkpoint, would be considered to determine if the checkpoint is reasonable and does not violate an individual's constitutional rights.
I hope this information is helpful. I mostly prefer MyAssignmentHelp.com for law assignments. If you have any additional questions, please let me know or refer to MyAssignmentHelp.com for further assistance.
Elements of the Search and Seizure Amendment relate to the protection of individuals from oppressive government searches and seizures. The founding fathers included a clause in the Bill of Rights on this subject for the protection of citizens and for the protection of the inherent freedoms of man.
What are the freedoms of law?It corresponds to a series of characteristics arranged in the universal declaration of rights that aims to protect man and his rights to social and civil freedom, that is, the possibility of not being oppressed, violated or suffering any threat to his integrity.
Therefore, the US Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures, DUI verification being legal and determined by its reasonableness and examination of the circumstances.
Find out more about Search and Seizure on:
https://brainly.com/question/30280195
#SPJ1
Do you think Mr. S is a reliable source? Explain your reasoning.
Answers
Answer:
No, I don't perceive Mr. S to be a reliable source. It is because the way he describes that how he discovered the Hae's body is enough to raise thr brows of viewers and listeners.
Explanation:
In Episode 3 of Serial, Mr. S is called by detectives to investigate his side of the story and how he came to find Hae's body which was found completely camouflaged in the dirt.
Mr. S can not be considered a reliabel source by the way he describes the event of his founding Hae's body in the forest, 127 miles away from the main road. Mr. S gives description to the detectives that he got off his car to pee and had a bottle of beer in his hand. It is interesting to note and enough to raise brows of listeners and viewers of the episode that how was he able to see Hae's body which was covered with dirt and was behind a heavy fallen log, which made impossible for someone to see the body easily (especially if someone is drunk).
So, because of this reasoning, one can not considered Mr. S to be a reliabel source.
Prior to adopting do title us attorney, these Federal prosecutors were
A. Part of the judicial system and held office for three years
B. Ranked as second highest office holder and their legal District
C. The highest-ranking office holder, and were appointed, not elected
D. Known as a district attorneys
Answers
Answer:
D. Known as district attorneys
What is the term for the type of company that provides coverage for an individual's risks?
Answers
Are you in favor or against the Reproductive Health Law, Explain Why or Why not?
50 words
Answers
Answer:
Since 40 years have passed since the Supreme Court granted women the legal right to an abortion in its landmark case Roe v. Wade, the issue is still roiled in controversy, as antiabortion groups and state legislatures attempt to chip away at a woman’s right to choose. Over the past two years, 135 new state-level abortion restrictions were enacted. Additionally, 20 states are allowing insurers or employers to deny women affordable contraception by refusing to comply with Obamacare’s birth-control mandate.
In spite of those hurdles, pro-choice advocates have not given up in their fight for reproductive justice. The passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, for example, was certainly a victory for those who want to make family-planning tools accessible to all women because it increased health insurance coverage for women while lowering their health costs. Thanks to the health care reform law, millions of more women of color have access to contraception starting in August 2012.
Yet, as the following facts show, there’s still work to be done to ensure that all women especially women of color can access their legal right to decide when and whether to be a parent. Below are the top 10 reasons why women of color have a particularly significant stake in the conversation on abortion and reproductive rights.
Hope this helps, have a nice day! :D
are verbal contracts valid? a. no. unless they are discharged through performance. b. yes. all verbal contracts are valid. c. no. all verbal contracts are void. d. yes. unless they violate the statute of frauds.
Answers
Yes, verbal contracts valid. Unless they violate the statute of frauds. Option D is the correct answer.
Legally speaking, verbal agreements can frequently be just as binding as written ones. Although they could be very challenging to regulate, you should take solace in the knowledge that there are relevant state and federal laws that can support the enforcement of such contracts and safeguard your legal rights. Even so, placing your agreement in paper is still the best approach to ensure that all parties are protected. Option D is the correct answer.
A sort of agreement involving two or more parties that is established orally rather than through a written document is known as a verbal contract. Regardless of whether an oral agreement comprises all of the components of a contract or not, there are situations when a physical written contract is required in order for the agreement to be enforceable. Option D is the correct answer.
Learn more about Contracts here:
https://brainly.com/question/5746834
#SPJ4
What is one of the disadvantages of getting a government-sponsored mortgage?
Answers
Answer:
c. Government mortgages takes a long time and a lot of of paperwork to get approved.
Lincoln has been taking advantage of benson through an unfair contract for several years. eventually, benson seeks relief and legal freedom from his contract
Answers
If a court finds that Lincoln has been taking advantage of Benson through an unfair contract for several years when Benson seeks relief and legal freedom, the b) Contract is voided.
What is an unfair contract?An unfair contract is one that adversely affects the rights of one of the contracting parties.
Such an unfair contract is void.
By definition, a void contract is effectively illegitimate and unenforceable ab nitio.
Answer Options:a) Contract will be modified
b) Contract is voided
c) Contract is voided, subject to investigation
d) Contract is valid
Thus, if a court finds that Lincoln has been taking advantage of Benson through an unfair contract for several years when Benson seeks relief and legal freedom, the b) Contract is voided.
Learn more about void contracts at https://brainly.com/question/7306383
#SPJ1
marbury v. madison (1803) is an important case because the justices
Answers
Answer:
Marbury v. Madison (1803) is an important case because the justices established the principle of judicial review, which gives the Supreme Court the power to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional.
hope it helps....
Mark as brainliest
Marbury v. Madison is significant because it created judicial review authority for the U.S. Supreme Court, lower federal courts, and subsequently counterpart state courts with regard to state constitutions.
The theory of judicial review was originally established in the case Marbury v. Madison, in which the U.S. Supreme Court first deemed a congressional act unlawful on February 24, 1803. John Marshall, the Chief Justice of the court, penned the opinion, which is regarded as one of the cornerstones of American constitutional law.
The chief justice acknowledged the problem the case presented to the court. Jefferson could simply disregard the writ of mandamus if the court issued it since the court lacked the authority to implement it.
Learn more about Marbury v. Madison case here:
https://brainly.com/question/30856133
#SPJ4
Any driver under 21 who is found to have a BAL of .05 or higher willA. be required to attend a substance abuse courseB. automatically have their license suspended for one yearC. be imprisoned for up to one yearD. not be allowed to drink alcohol until they are 25
Answers
Any driver under 21 who is found to have a BAL of .05 or higher will be required to attend a substance abuse course. The right answer is a.
Any driver under 21 who is pulled over by law enforcement and also has a.02 or greater blood alcohol content will certainly have their licence suspended for six months.
Every driver under 21 who has a.05 or higher breath alcohol concentration or blood alcohol concentration is compelled to take a substance abuse course. For any and all drivers under the age of 19, a test will be finished, and the results will be communicated to parents or legal guardians.
The correct answer is option a.
Know more about substance abuse course here
https://brainly.com/question/14311822
#SPJ4
The difference between unlimited wants and limited resources affects both individuals and the economy.
A.
True
OB.
False
Answers
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
I believe by having unlimited wants but not enough resources would be chaos. Resources are important in our life because they are used to sustain life and meet people's requirements. Any substance that people utilize can be recognized as a resource. By lacking them, common individuals would be highly affected, as the economy will collapse.
Why is it important for the president to have final approval over congressional legislation?
Answers
The president's final approval over congressional legislation plays a critical role in ensuring that laws are effective, legitimate, and representative of the country's interests.
The importace for the president to have final approval over congressional legislationit helps ensure that the laws passed by Congress align with the president's policies and agenda. The president, as the head of the executive branch, is responsible for enforcing and implementing laws.
The president's approval gives the legislation legitimacy and authority. As the highest elected official in the country, the president's approval signals to the American people that the law has undergone careful consideration and evaluation.
Learn more about congressional legislation at https://brainly.com/question/29549587
#SPJ1
If you live on the border of Trenton and Pennsylvania does common in law apply?
Answers
Sorry if this is not the answer you're looking for..
"New Jersey does not recognize common law marriages. In Pennsylvania, a couple may claim to be common law married if there is clear and convincing evidence that the couple exchanged words, in the present tense, for the specific purpose of establishing the legal relationship of husband and wife."
Which law provides legal recourse to people who purchase animals from pet dealers which are later found to have a disease or defect?.
Answers
The law that is being asked about here is the Pet Purchase Protection Law, also known as the "Puppy Lemon Law". It is a purchaser protection law that was enacted to provide legal recourse to people who bought animals from dealers that were later found to have disease or defect.
This purchaser protection legislations are currently in place in 22 U.S. states for the exact reason that their names suggest, and that is to safeguard the pet owner.
A typical Pet Purchaser Protection Act gives the fur parents a right of redress if they purchase an animal with a disease or defect from the seller while also requiring the seller to make specific disclosures regarding the animal that is being put on the market.
Discover why owning a pet from the pound or Animal Rescue League has many advantages: https://brainly.com/question/11899645
#SPJ4
Under constitutional law, does the President have the legal authority to mandate anything on the citizens in our country?
Answers
think tanks participate in the ________ step of the public policy process.
Answers
Think tanks participate in the formulation step of the public policy process.
This step involves the development of policy proposals and the gathering of evidence to support those proposals.
Think tanks are organizations that conduct research and provide analysis and advice to policy makers, so they play a key role in the formulation of public policy.
They often work with government officials, advocacy groups, and other stakeholders to develop policy recommendations and strategies for implementation.
Think tanks can also influence public opinion through their research and advocacy efforts, which can shape the political debate and ultimately impact the direction of public policy. Therefore, think tanks are a crucial component of the policy-making process.
To know more about Think tanks refer here: https://brainly.com/question/544607#
#SPJ11
Which of the following must employers by law withhold from their employees' pay?
a. contributions toward retirement funds
b. Health insurance contributions
c. unemployment taxes
d. Federal income taxes
Answers
Answer:
Social Security tax
The employee and employer split this percentage (6.2% each). You must withhold 6.2% from employee wages for the employee's portion. As an employer, you must also contribute 6.2% for Social Security tax. Employers must follow a Social Security wage base.
Explain why freedom of contract is not always beneficial to all contracting parties
Answers
Answer:
A contract assignment occurs when one party involved in a contract, called the assignor, transferred the contract's performance duties and benefits to a third party, called the assignee. The obligations acquired by a contract cannot be transferred to an assignee without the consent of the other party involved (not the assignor), so the assignor can transfer duties to perform and benefits but not obligations.
In this case, Beneficial assigned its contract with Animal Feed to Crop Transport, and delegated its duties to perform and benefits to Animal Feed
Explanation:
What does it mean when a lawyer makes a motion before or during the trial? That he or she believes the trial should be dismissed. That he or she believes the trial should be dismissed. That he or she asks the judge to rule on the legality of an issue.
Answers
Answer:
That he or she asks the judge to rule on the legality of an issue.
Explanation:
TRUE OR FALSE Interest rates typically fall in a recession because the demand for money decreases when real income falls.
Answers
Interest rates usually fall during a recession. This is because during a recession, the demand for money decreases as people and businesses cut back on spending due to reduced real income. The given statement is TRUE.
As a result, banks and other lenders have excess funds to lend out, which leads to a reduction in interest rates. Additionally, central banks typically respond to a recession by cutting interest rates to encourage borrowing and spending, which can help stimulate economic growth.
However, it is important to note that the relationship between interest rates and economic conditions can be complex and may vary depending on a variety of factors.
For more such questions on Interest rates , click on:
https://brainly.com/question/30005476
#SPJ11
Which of the following is an example of sentencing someone?
The judge tells a witness that he must repeat what he said.
The judge tells a defendant that he must take an oath to tell the truth.
The judge tells a convicted defendant that she must pay a fine.
The judge tells an attorney that she cannot ask a witness a particular question.
Answers
The other examples listed are not examples of sentencing. The judge telling a witness to repeat what they said is an instruction, the judge telling a defendant to take an oath to tell the truth is an order related to courtroom procedure, and the judge telling an attorney that they cannot ask a particular question is a ruling related to the admissibility of evidence.
Can State Constitutions can provide fewer rights to individuals than the U.S.Constitution?
a) Only with respect to Criminal Procedural Rights.
b) Only with respect to Civil Liberties.
c) They cannot provide fewer rights to individuals.
d) They can provide fewer rights to individuals.
Answers
The United States has more police departments than any other nation in the world. True or false
Answers
Answer:
True
Explanation:
the plaintiff brought his car to a mechanic for a tune-up. during the tune-up, the mechanic removed the fuse for the brake lights and inadvertently failed to replace it, causing the lights to stop working. as the plaintiff was driving his car home from the mechanic, he was involved in an accident. the plaintiff, seeing a friend walking along the road, slammed on his brakes to give the friend a ride. the defendant, who was driving the car behind the plaintiff, hit the plaintiff. the plaintiff sustained severe whiplash from the accident and has sued the defendant and the mechanic. at trial, the jury determined that the plaintiff's damages were $10,000 and that the defendant was 50% at fault, the mechanic was 25% at fault, and the plaintiff was 25% at fault. the jurisdiction recognizes pure several liability and partial comparative negligence. how much can the plaintiff collect from the defendant?
Answers
Answer:
100,000USD
Explanation:
PLEASE HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND THANKS
Income tax - 20%
Property tax - 2%
Sales Tax - 8%
Frank Ramos
Occupation - Dentist
Annual Salary - $78,000
Recently purchased $500 tablet for his sons birthday, a 10$ collar for his dog and 20$ pizza buffet lunch for his family
owns a $240,000 home
What are Franks property taxes for this year?
Answers
"the sale, distribution, and use of drugs should be legalized" is a
Answers
The given statement "the sale, distribution, and use of drugs should be legalized" expresses a position or opinion rather than a factual statement. It reflects a perspective on drug policy and legalization.
The view on drug legalization is a complex and debated topic that varies among individuals, communities, and countries. Some arguments supporting drug legalization include:
Regulation and Control: Legalizing drugs would allow for regulated production, distribution, and sale, which could potentially reduce the influence of criminal organizations involved in the illegal drug trade. It would also enable governments to establish quality control measures and enforce regulations for safer use.Personal Freedom and Individual Rights: Supporters argue that individuals should have the right to make decisions about their own bodies and engage in personal choices, including drug use, as long as it doesn't harm others.Public Health Approach: Legalization could shift the focus from criminalization to public health, emphasizing harm reduction, treatment, and prevention. It could allow for a more effective allocation of resources toward education, prevention programs, and addiction treatment services.Economic Benefits: Legalizing and regulating drugs could generate tax revenue and create a legal market that stimulates economic growth and job opportunities.On the other hand, opponents of drug legalization raise concerns about potential negative consequences, including:
Increased Drug Use: Some argue that legalization could lead to increased availability and accessibility of drugs, potentially resulting in higher rates of drug use, addiction, and associated social problems.Public Health Risks: Legalizing certain drugs, especially those with a higher potential for abuse and addiction, could pose significant public health risks, including increased overdoses, health complications, and societal burdens.Social Costs: Critics contend that legalizing drugs could contribute to broader societal issues, such as increased crime rates, impaired productivity, and negative social impacts, particularly on vulnerable populations.Regulatory Challenges: Establishing effective regulations and safeguards to mitigate potential risks associated with drug use and abuse can be challenging and require significant resources and infrastructure.It is important to note that the views on drug legalization vary, and the decision to legalize or not legalize drugs involves complex considerations related to public health, law enforcement, ethics, and societal norms. Different countries and jurisdictions have adopted different approaches, ranging from strict prohibition to partial decriminalization or regulated legalization of specific substances.
Learn more about legalization:
https://brainly.com/question/2524191
#SPJ11
Which Act provided funding for the development of state and local waste management programs?
Answers
The act that provided funding for the development of state and local waste management programs is the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
The RCRA was passed by the United States Congress in 1976, and it regulates the disposal of hazardous waste and the management of non-hazardous solid waste. The RCRA provides funding for state and local waste management programs through a variety of mechanisms. One of the main ways it does this is by providing grants to states to help them develop and implement their own waste management programs. These grants can be used for a variety of purposes, including the construction of waste facilities, the development of recycling programs, and the training of waste management professionals.
In addition to providing funding, the RCRA also establishes a framework for the management of hazardous waste. Under the RCRA, generators of hazardous waste are required to obtain permits and comply with strict regulations regarding the storage, transportation, and disposal of their waste. The act also provides for the cleanup of hazardous waste sites, and it establishes a program for the management of non-hazardous solid waste.
Overall, the RCRA has played a crucial role in promoting the responsible management of waste in the United States. Through its funding and regulatory provisions, it has helped to ensure that waste is managed in a way that protects public health and the environment.
Know more about hazardous waste here:
https://brainly.com/question/1160703
#SPJ11