Answers
A Criminal conviction in a cyberbullying case may result in fines and jail time.
What is meant by cyberbullying?Bullying or harassment that takes place online is known as cyberbullying or cyber harassment. Online bullying also refers to cyberbullying and harassment. As the digital environment has grown and technology has improved, it has become more and more prevalent, especially among youth.Cyberbullying is the act of someone, usually a teenager, harassing or bullying someone else online, especially on social networking networks. Posting rumors, threats, sexual remarks, a victim's private information, or derogatory labels are all examples of harmful bullying conduct (i.e. hate speech).Repeated conduct and an intention to cause damage are indicators of bullying or harassment.Cyberbullying victims may have reduced self-esteem, more sui*idal thoughts, and other unfavorable emotions including fear, frustration, anger, or depression.To learn more about Cyberbullying, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/13688206
#SPJ4
Related Questions
what evidence is given in the clip that substantiates walter cronkite’s claim about the convention opening with ""the promise of turmoil inside this hall and a threat of violence without""?
Answers
Walter Cronkite's claim that the Democratic National Convention of 1968 began with "the promise of turmoil inside this hall and a threat of violence without" is substantiated by various pieces of evidence presented in the clip.
The clip shows protesters outside the convention hall, holding signs and chanting slogans like "Stop the war now" and "Hell no, we won't go!" There are also several instances of violence, with police using tear gas and batons to control the crowds. Inside the convention hall, there is a sense of tension as well, with delegates arguing over issues like civil rights and the Vietnam War.
There are also several instances of disruption, including a group of delegates walking out of the convention and a group of protesters interrupting a speech by Senator Abraham Ribicoff. Overall, the evidence presented in the clip suggests that there was indeed a great deal of turmoil and threat of violence at the 1968 Democratic National Convention, just as Cronkite claimed. The events of that convention continue to be remembered as a pivotal moment in American history, with implications for both the political and cultural landscape of the United States.
To know more about convention hall visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31171202
#SPJ11
1. How does a plat method legal description for a condominium unit differ from a plat method legal description for a single-family home within a subdivision?
Answers
This is how they differ:
Explanation:
The plat method legal description is commonly used in the survey systems in government. It is kept in record in the county where the property is located. It refers to place the property is located in plat map thereby describing a specific parcel of the real property. It consists of
• Subdivision name
• Lot number
• Block number
• Plat book official number
• Page number in plat book
• County and state where plat was recorded
The plat method legal description is used for industrial parks, and single family homes inside a subdivisions.
Do you think it is fair for cases that end in a hung jury to be tried again? Why or why not?
Answers
Answer:
It is questionable whether or not retrial after a hung jury is Constitutional. ... If a mistrial occurs due to a hung jury, the prosecutor may decide to retry the case. A judge may decide to disallow this in some cases, but the prosecutor is usually allowed to proceed.
2. Drivers have a critical role to play in ensuring safety on the road. Which of the following is
not a safe practice for drivers?
a. Carrying out regular maintenance on the vehicle
b. Avoiding distractions while driving
c. Avoid driving while impaired by fatigue, alcohol or drugs
d. Avoid driving during bad weather
e. Running red lights at intersections
Answers
Answer:
Option e is not a safe practice for drivers
Explanation:
Which of the following agencies are permanent legal attaches, or “legats,” associated?
A. the FBI
B. The CIA
C. The bureau of immigration and customs enforcement
D. The US secret service
Answers
It's possible to develop bad coping skills.
Answers
Which of the following statements is correct regarding the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)?
A> It allows elected officials to hide and delete emails on private servers and was passed by the Clinton
administration. B It is a law that gives United States citizens the right to access some information collected by the Federal
Government.
C. None of these statements are correct.
D. • It was repealed in 2005.
E. O It applies to all governmental agencies including the Federal Government, state governments, and
municipalities.
Answers
The correct statement regarding the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) is it is a law that gives United States citizens the right to access some information collected by the Federal Government. Option b is correct.
The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) is a law that gives United States citizens the right to access information held by the federal government. This act was signed into law on July 4, 1966, by President Lyndon Johnson.
The Freedom of Information Act is one of the most important pieces of legislation in the country because it allows people to keep the government accountable for its actions and hold public officials responsible for their decisions. FOIA applies to all governmental agencies including the Federal Government, state governments, and municipalities.
Therefore, b is correct.
Learn more about Freedom of Information Act https://brainly.com/question/510696
#SPJ11
1
Which statement best describes recent voter trends in the United States?
• A.
People living in the Midwest and the South mostly vote Democratic.
B.
Women since the 1950s mostly vote Republican.
C
People living on the US coasts mostly vote for conservative candidates.
D.
Cuban American families mostly vote Republican.
Answers
The correct answer is option (C) Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican.
Why did Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican?The Constitution was written in 1787, while the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776. There were other occasions when the United States was founded than these. These seven men—George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison—are regarded as the principal Founding Fathers in order of significance.
While many other people also played a part in the establishment of the United States, most people regard these seven to be the Founding Fathers. The Americas were found in 1492, according to Christopher Columbus.
To learn more about vote visit:
https://brainly.in/question/20481185
#SPJ13
Write a two- to three-paragraph essay in which you compare and contrast the structure and function of the national government with the structure and function of New Hampshire's/States government. Use what you’ve learned about the national government and do research to find out more about your state government. Include the following in your essay:
The structure of national and state government
The functions of national and state government
The distribution of power between national and state government, including the purpose of Article IV, Section 4 of the US Constitution
Current state leaders and the roles and functions they perform within state government
Answers
National and state governments have similar structures and functions,with power distribution defined by the U.S. Constitution.
The Essay
The national government and New Hampshire's state government share a three-branch structure,with executive, legislative, and judicial branches.
They have distinct functions,such as law enforcement, lawmaking, and law interpretation. Power distribution is defined by the U.S. Constitution, including Article IV, Section 4,which guarantees a republican form of government in each state.
New Hampshire's current state leaders, including the Governor,perform crucial roles in executing state laws and managing government affairs.
Learn more about structure of government at:
https://brainly.com/question/22236084
#SPJ1
Which of the following best describes an incumbent?
Answers
Particularly during election cycles when the incumbent officeholder is up for reelection, the term "incumbent" is employed.
The meaning of incumbent in politicsAn incumbent refers to a person who currently holds a particular political office or position, such as a member of parliament, a senator, a governor, or a president.
The term "incumbent" is used particularly during election cycles when the current officeholder is running for re-election. In such a case, the incumbent candidate would be seeking to continue in their current position, while the challenger(s) would be seeking to unseat them and take over the role. The term "incumbent" is also used in business and other contexts to refer to a person who holds a particular position or job.
Learn more on incumbent here: https://brainly.com/question/29103682
#SPJ1
Which of the following best describes an incumbent?
1. Incumbents generally have greater name recognition than challengers.
2. PACs are more likely to donate money to incumbents than to challengers.
3. Challengers are forced to stand by their record of public service and have a harder time winning elections as a result.
4. Political parties focus attention and money on challengers, rarely supporting incumbents.
Nkombe and smet classification of African philosophy strengths and weaknesses
Answers
An attempt is made to classify the various philosophical traditions that exist on the African continent using the Nkombe and Smet classification of African philosophy.
Strengths and weaknesses of African philosophy as classified by Nkombe and Smet?This classification system's recognition of the diversity of African philosophy and the various factors that have shaped it, including colonialism and cultural exchange, is one of its main advantages. Additionally, it enables a more nuanced comprehension of the various philosophical traditions and their individual contributions to the subject. The classification system, according to some critics, can be constrictive, reinforce stereotypes, or essentialize particular philosophical traditions. The process of classifying philosophies can also be subjective and may not fully reflect the nuanced differences between each tradition.
To Know more about Nkombe and Smet Visit:
brainly.com/question/31344636
#SPJ1
What is the Nkombe and smet classification of African philosophy? What are its strengths and weaknesses?
Random patrol is commonly believed by police administration to create a sense of:
a. semipresence.
b. omnipresence.
c. nonpresence.
d. none of these choices.
Answers
Police administration frequently thinks that random patrolling gives the impression of omnipresence.
The concept of "omnipresence" is what random patrol is based on. The police force patrols the streets at random intervals, providing the illusion of constant presence in order to deter crime.
Content loaded Random patrol Random patrols can also be known as directed patrols. They're usually patrols that are done on a frequent basis by the police. They are usually carried out in high-crime areas, hotspots, or areas that are known for drug or gang activity, among other things. In essence, the idea of random patrol is to reduce crime in the area by instilling a sense of fear in potential criminals.
Police administration creates a sense of omnipresence Random patrol is commonly believed by police administration to create a sense of omnipresence.
To Know more about omnipresence.
https://brainly.com/question/7252930
#SPJ11
a cpa sued a former client for the non-payment of the final bill. although happy with the cpa's performance of services, the client claimed that the cpa is not entitled to the final bill payment because the contract between the client and the cpa failed to meet the statute of frauds. the client argues that the contract allowed up to 15 months for the cpa to complete the work, the contract price was well over $5,000, and though the client sent signed checks to the cpa, the client did not sign the contract. which of the following statements about this situation is correct?
Answers
The correct statement about this situation is "The Statute of Frauds does apply, and the requirements are not satisfied, thereby preventing enforcement of the contract terms". Therefore, the correct answer is option A.
The Statute of Frauds is a legal requirement that certain types of contracts must be in writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought. In this case, the contract between the CPA and the client falls under the Statute of Fraud because it involves a contract for services for a price of more than $5,000.
The client claims that the contract failed to meet the Statute of Fraud because it was not signed by the client. Although the client sent signed checks to the CPA, this does not satisfy the requirement that the contract itself must be signed.
Furthermore, the client argues that the contract allowed up to 15 months for the CPA to complete the work, which could also be seen as a failure to meet the Statute of Frauds requirement for a definite term.
Therefore, option A is correct. The Statute of Frauds does apply, and the requirements are not satisfied, thereby preventing enforcement of the contract terms. The CPA may need to seek legal recourse to recover the final bill payment, but the lack of a signed contract may make it difficult to do so.
To know more about Fraud refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28239119#
#SPJ11
Complete Question:
A CPA sued a former client for nonpayment of the final bill. Although happy with the CPA’s performance of services, the client claimed that the CPA is not entitled to the final bill payment because the contract between the client and the CPA failed to meet the Statute of Frauds. The client argues that the contract allowed up to 15 months for the CPA to complete the work, the contract price was well over $5,000, and though the client sent signed checks to the CPA, the client did not sign the contract. Which of the following statements about this situation is correct?
A) The Statute of Frauds does apply, and the requirements are not satisfied, thereby preventing enforcement of the contract terms.
B) The Statute of Frauds does not apply, allowing enforcement of the contract terms.
C) The Statute of Frauds does apply, but the requirements are satisfied by the client’s signing of the checks, allowing enforcement of the contract terms.
D) The Statute of Frauds does not apply, preventing enforcement of the contract terms.
Under the Fourteenth Amendment, the Bill of Rights now applies to the states and not only Congress. Group of answer choices True False
Answers
Answer:true
Explanation:
Mary, Janet and Shantil formed a partnership, Brookdale Senior Care (BSC), to provide temporary housing and general care for elderly people in Memphis, Tennessee. One of the temporary residents left the stove on and burned down the house, which resulted in the loss of the entire building and contents. One of the residents, Francine, sued BSC and obtained a judgment of $ 30,000 against it, but the partnership could not pay the judgment
Answers
The option that Francine has since the partnership cannot get the 30000 would be to have assets that are worth this amount from the partnership.
What is a partnership?This is the type of business between two or more people were the parties have to share in the risks, the profits and the loss of the business.
Francine can get the assets from BSC given that this is a partnership and other it, all of the partners have the same liability
Complete question
Mary, Janet and Shantil formed a partnership, Brookdale Senior Care (BSC), to provide temporary housing and general care for elderly people in Memphis, Tennessee. One of the temporary residents left the stove on and burned down the house, which resulted in the loss of the entire building and contents. One of the residents, Francine, sued BSC and obtained a judgment of $ 30,000 against it, but the partnership could not pay the judgment.
What are Francine’s options if the Brookdale partnership cannot pay the $30,000?
Read more on partnership here:
https://brainly.com/question/25012970
#SPJ1
What is your opinion on the recent voter bill? Do you believe Washington D.C. should be a state? Do you think anyone including those without identification be able to vote.
Answers
Answer:
yes I do think washington should be a state
Explanation:
I say this because there are a total of 50 states and if we take washington out it would be 49 and it doesnt make any sense to take washington out
In what way did the spoils system as andrew jackson used it have a negative effect on government?.
Answers
As per Andrew Jackson The federal government system is corrupted as a result of the appointment of those who are loyal to the president as civil servants.
When Andrew Jackson was elected president in March 1829, he experimented with a system for employing federal employees known as the spoils system. Under this system, government employees and civil servants are appointed based on their loyalty.
According to Andrew Jackson, the method will improve federal government performance and remove political opponents from federal jobs. On the other hand, it had caused widespread corruption in the federal system and employees of the government who performed their duties for their own benefit.
Learn more about Andrew Jackson here:
https://brainly.com/question/27920494
#SPJ4
Against utilitarianism, which of the following authors would object, “To maximize utility by imposing burdens on some individuals is to treat all of society like a single person. But society is not like a single person, and so utilitarianism is mistaken.
Answers
Answer:
(D) A and B or both correct
Explanation:
how did brown v. board of education differ from roe v. wade with respect to relations of the court to the executive branch?
Answers
Troops had to be sent in by two presidents to implement Brown v. Board, whereas Republican presidents have sought to reduce the impact of Roe v.
After Vinson died in September 1953, President Dwight D. Eisenhower appointed Earl Warren as Chief Justice. Warren had supported the mixing of Mexican-American students in California faculty systems following Mendez v. Westminster.
President Eisenhower failed to fully aid Brown's choice. The president didn't like managing racial troubles and failed to speak out in the choice of the courtroom's ruling. Although the president typically prevented comment on courtroom choices, his silence in this example may have endorsed resistance.
Learn more about Republicans here https://brainly.com/question/543079
#SPJ4
I am taking a test tomorrow and my teacher needs a paragraph about 28th amendment, explaining why it is important and how it would benefit our society and why congress must ratify it can someone help me with this?
Answers
Answer:
The 28th Amendment is important because it is a key to fixing the system that makes high-dollar donors more powerful than every other American. The amendment offers lasting, structural reform to ensure an equal voice for every American.
Explanation:
that little paragraph is just about why it is important, i cant help you with the rest because i don't know the answer to the last two questions, i hope this still helped in some way, remember that this paragraph that is above only explains why the 28th amendment is important. your welcome, have a great rest of your day :)
Which term is used to describe the official judgement stating the guilt or liability of the defendant concerning the issue in question?
Answers
Accused: formally charged but not yet tried for committing a crime; the person who has been charged may also be called the defendant. Acquittal: a judgment of court, based on the decision of either a jury or a judge, that a person accused is not guilty of the crime for which he has been tried
I hope this is what your kind of looking for!
sorry if it isn't!
Formally accused of committing a crime but has not yet been put on trial; the accused is also referred to as the defendant. A person is declared innocent of the offence for which they have been convicted in court upon being found not guilty by a jury or a judge.
What is judgment?A court's official decision establishing the relative rights and claims of the parties to a lawsuit. The court's constitutional right to hear a case and make a decision.
Moral judgements about what is right or wrong in character traits, such as virtues or vices. Moral judgments about what is right or wrong in action. Moral judgments about what is good or evil in people.
A judgment is the ultimate determination of a court or tribunal. Following the judges' review of all relevant evidence from the legal trial as well as of all rights and obligations, the plaintiff and defendant will get the final verdict.
Thus, Formally accused of committing a crime but has not yet been put on trial.
For more information about judgment, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2890222
#SPJ6
Which of the following is a properly reversed version of the following Boolean expression, according to De Morgan's Laws? (2 == 3) && (-1 < 5) && isPrime(n) a. (2 != 3) && (-1 > 5) && isPrime(n) b. (2 == 3) || (-1<5) || isPrime(n) c. !(2 == 3) && !(-1<5) && !isPrime(n) d. (2 !=3) || (-1 >= 5) || !isPrime(n) e. !(2 != 3) || !(-1<5) || isNotPrime(n) 4
Answers
The properly reversed version of the following Boolean expression, according to De Morgan's Laws is (2 != 3) || (-1>=5) || !is Prime(n).The Boolean expression provided is (2 == 3) && (-1 < 5) && is Prime(n).
De Morgan's laws are two laws that describe how logical operations, such as AND and OR, can be inverted using NOT. The first law of De Morgan states that the negation of a conjunction is the disjunction of the negations. In other words, !(A && B) is equivalent to !A || !B.
The second law of De Morgan states that the negation of a disjunction is the conjunction of the negations. In other words, !(A || B) is equivalent to !A && !B.Using the first law of De Morgan, we can write the inverse of the given Boolean expression as:(2 != 3) || (-1>=5) || !isPrime(n)This is the properly reversed version of the given Boolean expression, according to De Morgan's laws.
For more such questions on De Morgan's Laws
https://brainly.com/question/13278160
#SPJ11
can students get Married To school Teachers
Answers
They can!! When they are 18 of course. While it is a little weird to get married to someone who used to TEACH you, love has no boundaries (except it's a child then wth you p e d o)
Assume that there is a 150 year old law in the statutes of your ...brainly
Answers
Answer:
Fwrwfjfjffhbf
Explanation:
What is the purpose of statutory laws? *
A)They give executive agencies their power
B)They limit the power of government
C)They allow state legislations to make laws
D) They protect the right of the people
Answers
Strickland attempted to bribe Judge Sylvania Woods to show leniency toward one of Strickland's friends who had a case pending before the judge. Judge Woods immediately reported this to the state's attorney and was asked to play along with Strickland until the actual payment of money occurred. Strickland gave $2,500 to the judge, who promptly turned it over to the state's attorney's office. Strickland was indicted for bribery, pled guilty, and was sentenced to a four-year prison term. Three months after the criminal trial, Strickland filed a motion for the return of his $2,500. Will the court order the return of his money
Answers
Answer:
No, the court will not return the $2500 back to Strickland but rather, the money has been forfeited to the government due to the circumstances around it.
Since the money was a bribe offered, it is within the view of the government to withheld the money as evidence as well as take the money due to the illegal purpose it tends to actualize when it was offered.
Explanation:
t is important for a licensee or broker to remove ambiguity when a seller's unclear decision could be discriminatory by forcing the seller to
Answers
Answer: Articulate his or her concerns
Explanation:
If the concerns are founded in bias, you can take action to remove or overcome the bias or repudiate any support for it. On the other hand, the sellers' concern may be the product of considerations or impressions which you or your sponsoring broker can either clear up or explain in non-discriminatory terms.
Assuming an otherwise valid offer, which of the following would be the Melnick's best rationale in trying to enforce a contract for the sale of three peppers for two cents?rescission and damages, if out of pocket expenses were incurred as a result of the fraud.Probably not because there is no statement of material fact since he did not say he was a medical doctor.A unilateral mistake does not relieve the party who made the mistake from contract liability.
Answers
Assuming an otherwise valid offer, the Melnick's best rationale in trying to enforce a contract for the sale of three peppers for two cents would be to seek rescission and damages if out of pocket expenses were incurred as a result of fraud.
This is because fraud occurs when a party intentionally misrepresents or conceals material facts with the intention of inducing another party to enter into a contract. If the Melnick's can prove that the seller deliberately misled them about the value or quality of the peppers, they may have a valid claim for fraud.
In such a case, they may seek rescission, which means the cancellation of the contract and the restoration of the parties to their pre-contractual positions. They may also seek damages to cover any losses they suffered as a result of the fraudulent transaction.
A unilateral mistake, on the other hand, would not be a valid rationale for enforcing the contract as it does not relieve the party who made the mistake from contract liability.
To know more about contract liability visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24037358
#SPJ11
Which statement would the author of the passage most
likely agree with?
Passage:
3. The Patriot Act updated the law to reflect new technologies and new threats. The Act brought the law up to date with current technology, so we no longer have to fight a digital-age battle with antique weapons-legal authorities leftover from the era of rotary telephones. When investigating the murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl, for example, law enforcement used one of the Act's new
authorities to use high-tech means to identify and locate
some of the killers.
-"The USA PATRIOT Act:
Preserving Life and Liberty,"
Department of Justice
✓ The Patriot Act is essential to the United States'
efforts to combat terrorism.
O The Patriot Act is essential to the United States'
efforts to combat war.
O The Patriot Act is needed to help the United States
protect privacy rights.
O The Patriot Act is needed to help the United States
protect suspects' rights.
A is the correct answer! :)
Answers
Answer:
THANK YOU IF IT IS "A"....<3333
Explanation:
According to the passage, the correct option is A. The Patriot Act is essential to the United States' efforts to combat terrorism.
The passage states that the Patriot Act updated the law to reflect new technologies and new threats. The Act was reportedly used to look into the killing of Wall Street Journal writer Daniel Pearl, according to the document. This implies that the Patriot Act is a powerful weapon in the battle against terrorism in the author's eyes.
Therefore, the author of the passage would most likely agree with the statement that the Patriot Act is essential to the United States' efforts to combat terrorism. Hence, Option A. is correct.
Learn more about the Patriot Act, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11306077
#SPJ5
What is a document called that is filed with the court to state the position of the plaintiff or the defendant in a lawsuit and ask for relief from the court?.
Answers
The document is called Pleadings.
What is a Lawsuit?A lawsuit is an action brought by one or more parties in a civil court of law against another party. Only a limited number of laws from long ago that are still in force include the phrase "suit in law." The term "lawsuit" refers to a civil action in which the plaintiff asks the court for a legal or equitable remedy.
The plaintiff's complaint must get a response from the defendant. If the plaintiff wins, a judgment will be rendered in their favor, and the court may then make a number of orders, including those to uphold a right, grant damages, or impose a temporary or permanent injunction to stop or compel action. It is possible to issue a declaratory decision to end future legal problems.
To know more about Lawsuit, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/18273856
#SPJ4