A college student from State A hit another car driven by a resident from State B when the college student was traveling through State B. The State B driver brought an action in State B state court against the State A college student, who has limited financial resources. The college student filed a motion to dismiss, claiming the State B court lacks personal jurisdiction.What is the best argument to support the college student’s motion to dismiss?A The college student did not take actions to purposely avail herself of State B simply by driving through State B.B It is unfair, inconvenient, and highly unreasonable to require a college student with limited financial resources to defend the action in State B for financial reasons.C The interstate judicial system’s interest in obtaining the most efficient resolution of the controversy is violated by requiring the college student to defend the action in the forum state.D State B is not the proper venue to file this claim.
Answers
The best argument to support the college student's motion to dismiss is that the college student did not take actions to purposely avail herself of State B simply by driving through State B.
Hence, the correct option is A.
Personal jurisdiction refers to a court's authority to make decisions and rulings that are binding on a particular person or entity. For a state court to have personal jurisdiction over a defendant, the defendant must have certain minimum contacts with the state in which the court is located.
In this case, the college student's contacts with State B were limited to driving through it, which is not enough to establish the necessary minimum contacts.
Option B is not a strong argument for dismissing the case on jurisdictional grounds. While it may be unfair and inconvenient for the college student to defend the action in State B, that is not necessarily relevant to the question of personal jurisdiction.
Option C is also not a strong argument for dismissal on jurisdictional grounds. While the efficient resolution of controversies is an important goal of the judicial system, it is not the sole determinant of whether a court has personal jurisdiction over a defendant.
Option D is not applicable in this case because venue refers to the appropriate geographic location for a case to be heard, while personal jurisdiction relates to a court's authority over a particular person or entity.
To know more about motion to dismiss here:
https://brainly.com/question/30548763
#SPJ4
Related Questions
Carlos agrees to transport a valuable painting from London to Liverpool for Danesh, for a fee of £500. The painting is required urgently, for an upcoming exhibition. The day before the painting is to be transported, the only airline flying from London has a problem with its jets, and all flights will be grounded for a week. This is the first time such a serious problem has ever happened with this airline. The only alternative for Carlos is to pay for a private chartered flight for the painting, or transport it by road. Both of these options will cost more than £1000. Danesh claims that the extra costs are Carlos’ problem, and that he will sue Carlos for breach of contract if the painting is not delivered on time. Carlos says that the contract has now been frustrated, and a new contract must be negotiated. Who is right?
Answers
Carlos is right as the contract was frustrated, not by Carlos or Danesh, but by the failure of the Airline to fly.
What is contract frustration?Contract frustration refers to the breach of contract for non-performance without the fault of either party to the contract.
This implies that the obliging party cannot perform and fulfill the contractual obligations because of the occurrence of a fundamental event, making it impracticable or impossible.
Thus, Carlos is right as the contract was frustrated, not by Carlos or Danesh, but by the failure of the Airline to fly, thereby necessitating the formation of a new contract.
Learn more about the frustration of contracts at https://brainly.com/question/27415360
#SPJ1
A body was discovered in the weight room of a gym. A man had beendoing " arm curls" with heavy weights. The only place rigor was present was in his arms.
Answers
Answer:
what are you asking?
Explanation:
Answer:
The weights crushed him.
Explanation:
I think because he was in a room full of weigths or maybe it was a murder. These are just guesses based on the text since there is not much of a question.
Need help determining whether this person would be guilty of the crime of attempt.
Answers
Answer:
nuu
Explanation:
What can officers do to maintain effective communication during emergency situations
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
In emergency situations like school shooting, bomb threats and other emergency situations, people will tend to panic. The officer would need to explain what is going and to calm the people down by keeping their explanation short. It can also save lives and reduce injury. Knowing the proper protective actions to take enables people to reduce their risks.
how did the constitution change the nature of the early united states
Answers
The Constitution changed the nature of the early United States by establishing a stronger central government, separating powers among different branches, creating a bicameral legislature, providing a clear ratification process, protecting individual liberties through the Bill of Rights, and allowing for flexibility in future changes.
The Constitution changed the nature of the early United States in several significant ways:
1. Establishment of a stronger central government: Before the Constitution, the United States was governed by the Articles of Confederation, which created a weak central government with limited powers. The Constitution established a stronger central government with the power to levy taxes, regulate commerce, and maintain a standing army, thus providing more stability and order.
2. Separation of powers: The Constitution divided the government into three branches - the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. This separation of powers ensured that no single branch would hold too much power, creating a system of checks and balances that prevents tyranny and protects individual rights.
3. Creation of a bicameral legislature: The Constitution established a two-house legislature, known as Congress, which is composed of the Senate and the House of Representatives. This system was designed to balance the interests of large and small states, with each state having equal representation in the Senate and representation based on population in the House.
4. Ratification process: The Constitution provided a clear process for ratification, which required nine out of the thirteen states to approve the document. This ensured that the Constitution would only become the supreme law of the land if a majority of the states agreed to its terms.
5. The Bill of Rights: To address concerns about individual liberties, the first ten amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, were added to the Constitution. These amendments guarantee fundamental rights, such as freedom of speech, religion, and the right to bear arms, to all American citizens.
6. Flexibility for future changes: The Constitution included an amendment process, allowing for future changes to adapt to societal needs and issues. This flexibility has allowed the Constitution to remain relevant and functional over time, addressing issues that the Founding Fathers could not have anticipated.
To know more about Constitution of United States refer here: https://brainly.com/question/2416781#
#SPJ11
because of significant concerns about the validity of functional behavior assessment interviews, behavior analysts can conduct further investigations such as __________ and/or __________.
Answers
Because of significant concerns about the validity of functional behavior assessment interviews, behavior analysts can conduct further investigations such as Direct observation and/or data collection.
Functional behavior assessments (FBAs) are a common tool used by behavior analysts to identify the underlying function of a behavior. One such investigation is direct observation, where the behavior analyst physically observes the behavior in the natural environment and records data about the antecedents and consequences of the behavior. This data can then be used to support or refute the information obtained through the interview.
Functional behavior assessments that can be conducted are data collection. The behavior analyst records and analyzes objective data, such as frequency, duration, and intensity of the behavior, to identify patterns and trends. This data can be obtained through various methods, including event recording.
To learn more about Functional behavior assessments, visit here.
https://brainly.com/question/28389970
#SPJ4
a. If you were the Garrett family's attorney, what arguments would you make at the trial? What
evidence would you want to introduce during the trial?
Answers
Answer:
Since Mrs Garrett had died suffering from lung cancer as a result of having been smoking cigarettes for 20 years, suing ABC Tobacco Company I'd have argued that it was these cigarettes from the aforementioned company that resulted in her developing a cancer of the lungs and subsequently dying from it. As evidence, I would present her medical reports that state clearly and without a shadow of doubt that the cause of death in her case was indeed lung cancer.
Hope that answers the question, have a great day!
The evidence that Garrett family's attorney should introduce during the trial is that Mrs. Garrett died of lung cancer.
Based on the complete information, it was stated that Mrs. Garrett dues from lung cancer due to the fact that she had been smoking cigarettes for quite a number of years.
Therefore, this will have been presented as evidence to sue ABC Tobacco company that it was the cigarettes that led to cancer that she had and the eventual death.
The medical report that showed that she had cancer should also be presented to support the claim.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/15558413
Inmates at state jails served on average ________ percent of their sentences before being released.
59.6
61.1
75.8
99.4
Answers
75.8 percent. Inmates at state jails typically served an average of 75.8 percent of their sentences before being released, according to a 2020 report by the Vera Institute of Justice.
What is justice?Justice is a concept of moral rightness based on ethics, rationality, law, natural law, fairness, and equity. It is fairness in the way people are treated, in the way laws are applied and in the way authority is exercised. Justice is the process of ensuring equality, fairness and respect for all people, regardless of their gender, race, ethnicity, religion, or other identity. It is about ensuring that the rights of all people are respected, and that their voices are heard and taken into account, regardless of their social or economic status. Justice is also about making sure that everyone has access to resources and opportunities equally, and that no one is discriminated against or treated unfairly. Justice is ultimately about upholding the rights of all people, and ensuring that everyone is treated with respect and dignity.
This rate of time served has remained relatively steady since 2005, with a slight decrease in time served in recent years.
To learn more about justice
https://brainly.com/question/30085240
#SPJ4
The Romans had a system of judges who acted as a jury they were called:
O Leges
O Judices
O Pax Leges
Judicators
Answers
Answer:
judices
Explanation:
I learned it in middle school
the uniform commercial code is a major source of laws influencing data and privacy.True or False
Answers
The given statement "The uniform commercial code is a major source of laws influencing data and privacy" is False.
With the intention of harmonising the laws governing sales and other commercial transactions throughout the United States, the Uniform Commercial Code, which was first published in 1952, is one of several Uniform Acts that have been established as law. The UCC must be adopted by all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the United States Territories.
While most U.S. jurisdictions have succeeded in accomplishing this challenging goal, some have not embraced every article in the UCC, while others have not adopted any at all. Additionally, the UCC's adoption differs considerably from one U.S. jurisdiction to another.
To know more about Law, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13242861
#SPJ4
I need help please. Give me a few sentences at least and I will give u brainlist.
Answers
More than 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die as a result of felonious attacks by criminals.
Answers
It is a false statement that more than 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die as a result of felonious attacks by criminals.
What is the meaning of felonious attacks?As a crime, a felonious assault means any sort of attack or threat of attack on another individual in which the attacker uses a dangerous weapon and seeks to cause serious harm but however stops short of an attempt to kill the victim.
These attacks on Police officers does not constitute to why 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die, rather, the causes are accidents, illness, old age etc. Therefore, the statement is a false statement.
Missing options True/False
Read more about attacks
brainly.com/question/28866933
#SPJ1
Why is it important for the president to have final approval over congressional legislation?
Answers
The president's final approval over congressional legislation plays a critical role in ensuring that laws are effective, legitimate, and representative of the country's interests.
The importace for the president to have final approval over congressional legislationit helps ensure that the laws passed by Congress align with the president's policies and agenda. The president, as the head of the executive branch, is responsible for enforcing and implementing laws.
The president's approval gives the legislation legitimacy and authority. As the highest elected official in the country, the president's approval signals to the American people that the law has undergone careful consideration and evaluation.
Learn more about congressional legislation at https://brainly.com/question/29549587
#SPJ1
explain the role stare decisis likely played in the wesberry v. sanders decision. bolditalicunderline
Answers
. The court relied heavily on the precedent set by the earlier decision of Baker v. Carr (1962) that established the doctrine of "one person, one vote."
The court's ruling in Wesberry v. Sanders declared Georgia's congressional districts as unconstitutional because they were not evenly apportioned. The court held that the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause requires that congressional districts be apportioned by population.
The decision was anchored on the doctrine of stare decisis, which ensured consistency and uniformity in the court's decision-making process. Therefore, the principle of stare decisis played a vital role in the Wesberry v. Sanders ruling.
Learn more about court decision at:
https://brainly.com/question/23128341
#SPJ11
Stare decisis played a critical role in the Wesberry v. Sanders decision. It's essential to note that the principle of stare decisis has been critical in the legal sector, particularly in common law countries such as the United States of America.
Stare decisis is a legal principle in which judges are obligated to follow the previous court judgments and rulings when dealing with a legal issue. The objective of stare decisis is to offer certainty, predictability, and fairness in the judicial system. It is grounded on the belief that the law should be consistent over time. The principle of stare decisis played a critical role in Wesberry v. Sanders by upholding the precedent established in Baker v. Carr, where the Supreme Court concluded that the problem of apportionment was an issue justifiable in federal courts. The Wesberry v. Sanders decision established that "one person, one vote" should be applied to the election of members of the House of Representatives. Previously, there were disparities in the number of eligible voters in different Congressional districts. The "one person, one vote" principle requires that the weight of every vote be equal in Congressional districts, which leads to the most fair elections possible. Furthermore, the Court noted in the Wesberry v. Sanders case that the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment required that citizens have equal representation in Congress. Hence, the "one person, one vote" principle was established in accordance with the principle of stare decisis to ensure fairness and consistency in the judicial system.
To know more about Decisis, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/21085371
#SPJ11
What is another name for the first day of winter
Answers
Answer:
winter solstice that's all I have
Explanation:
enough
Answer:
Winter solstice
Explanation:
This astronomical event appears on calendars as the first day of winter—but meteorologists have already gotten a head start on the season.
the granting of a divorce because an opponent fails to appear or answer the complaint is a(n):
Answers
The granting of a divorce because an opponent fails to appear or answer the complaint is known as a default divorce.
In legal proceedings, when one party files for divorce and serves the divorce papers to the other party, the responding party is typically required to file an answer or response within a specified time frame.
If the responding party fails to appear or answer the complaint within the designated period, the court may grant a default divorce.
This means that the divorce is granted in favor of the party who initiated the divorce proceedings because the other party failed to participate or contest the divorce.
A default divorce is a legal remedy when one party's lack of response indicates a lack of interest or willingness to contest the divorce, allowing the court to proceed with the dissolution of the marriage.
Learn more about divorce here: brainly.com/question/4568628
#SPJ11
Keisha committed a crime in New York, but the punishment for the crime is harsher in Georgia, so the prosecutor organizes her case to be transferred to Georgia
Answers
Answer:
Keisha has the right to be tried in New York under the Sixth Amendment: “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed[.]”
Explanation:
Keisha committed a crime in New York, but the punishment for the crime is harsher in Georgia, so the prosecutor organizes her case to be transferred to Georgia because the sixth Amendment protects a criminal defendant the right to be represented by an attorney during trial.
What is crime?The term crime refers to the illegal activity. The crime is not allow to the country, if any person is commit the crime are go the jail. The legal punishable by the state in case of crime. The punishment is set according to the different crime. For example a person is harm another person property.
Keisha has the rights to be tried in New York underneath the Sixth Amendment, which states that "in all criminal proceedings, the accused shall have the right to a prompt and public trial, by an unbiased jury appointed by the state and jurisdiction wherein the crime may have been committed."
As a result, the conclusion of the sixth Amendment protects a criminal defendant the right to be represented by an attorney during trial are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on crime, here:
https://brainly.com/question/9997722
#SPJ2
congress passed a federal law in 1970 that allowed 18 year olds to vote in national state and local elections. in a paragraph explain why congress created the law and two effects of the law.
Answers
Explanation:
Congress did that because when you're 18yrs of age , you are almost an adult.
1. It has helped in the election of presidential and parliamentary candidates
2. It has helped to improve marriages .
sorry if I'm wrong
Answer:
Congress passed the law so 18 yr olds could enlist in the armed forces.
Explanation:
In order for people to enlist they have to have the right to vote. Congress did this so they could have more people enlist in the Veitnam war.
True or false for top. will thumbs up if done correct
70. In general, a drawer can stop payment of a certified or cashier's check.
71. Certification of a check must be written on the check and must be signed by an agent of the bank.
72. An indorser's conditional liability is discharged if a check is not presented for payment within three days after the date the indorser signed the check.
Answers
Answer: 70 t
71 t
72 f
Explanation:
71. True
72. False
The Jordan Keys law firm represented the Greater Southeast Community Hospital of Washington, D.C., in a medical malpractice suit against the hospital. The hospital was self-insured for the first $1,000,000 of liability and the St. Paul Insurance Co. provided excess coverage up to $4,000,000. The law firm was owed $67,000 for its work on the malpractice suit when the hospital went into bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court ordered the law firm to release its files on the case to St. Paul to defend under the excess coverage insurance, and the Jordan Keys firm sued St. Paul for its legal fees of $67,000 expended prior to the bankruptcy under an “implied-in-fact contract” because the insurance company would have the benefit of all of its work. Decide. [Jordan Keys v. St. Paul Fire, 870 A.2d 58 (D.C.)] what is the answer?
Answers
The court decided in favor of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.
What led the court to this decision to decide in favor of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company?The court found that there was no implied-in-fact contract between Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.
The court found that the hospital and Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP had an express contract requiring the hospital to pay for legal work rendered by Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP. The court found that an implied contract cannot stand in the face of an express one.
Read more about court case here;
https://brainly.com/question/30552468
#SPJ1
A city government wants to track down people who run small business and do not pay the city’s $125 business licenses fee. The city hired a private detective to obtain IRS tax records of city residents and determine who has reported small business income to the IRS but not paid for a license.
a) What arguments might the city government give in support for this action? What argument might privacy advocates give against it?
Answers
One of the arguments that the city government could give in support of the action or levy and collecting taxes is that small business owner are beneficiaries of public infrastructure that are installed and maintained using public funds. Hence, it is only just and equitable for them to contribute to the repair and maintenance of such facilities.
The argument that privacy advocates may give against such taxes is that they already pay Company Income Tax to the IRS. Hence this is a duplication of tax.
What is the IRS?The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is the revenue service for the federal government of the United States, responsible for collecting federal taxes and enforcing the Internal Revenue Code, the major body of federal statutory tax legislation.
The Internal Revenue Service is the nation's tax-collecting agency, and it is responsible for enforcing the Internal Revenue Code, which was adopted by Congress.
Learn more about taxes:
https://brainly.com/question/25783927
#SPJ1
What is advancements can be made to improve on your chosen area going forward for the next 20 years. For SAFTEY IN CORRECTIONS
Answers
The advancements that can be made to improve your chosen area going forward for the next 20 years are known by research into the missing links in your field.
This is further explained below.
What is your chosen area of study?Generally, Your field of study should ideally be relevant to your intended future career path and be capable of making a possible contribution to the realization of your desired professional outcomes.
Many students tend to grossly underestimate how important it is to identify a pertinent study subject that is suitable for their dissertation. It is not possible to make a hasty choice about this matter.
In conclusion, Research into the gaps that exist in your industry has shown the potential improvements that may be made to your chosen sector moving ahead over the next 20 years.
Read more about your area of study
https://brainly.com/question/13175153
#SPJ1
Se encarga de vigilar y evaluar el ejercicio del gasto público, para lo cual realiza actos de fiscalización, con la finalidad de consolidar un gobierno de transparencia y honestidad
Answers
Answer:
Auditor General.
Explanation:
Un auditor es una persona que realiza una auditoría y verifica, mediante cuestionamiento, observación y escucha, cómo se está desarrollando una persona u organización y si se están cumpliendo las especificaciones financieras y legales que le son exigibles. Así, el Auditor General de Gobierno es el funcionario público que controla el estado financiero de las entidades de la administración pública, así como también lleva a cabo la fiscalización y control de cada acto particular que es realizado por el gobierno.
how can the principle of Ubuntu be applied in the criminal justice system to ensure justice for victim
Answers
Answer:
It underlines Ubuntu's compassion and empathy, and our courts should promote that principle through rehabilitation, taking into account the potential for reconciliation between an offender and the community. Still have questions?
How are presidential vetoes and congressional overrides related to partisan control of government?.
Answers
Congress's power to override the President's veto forms a “balance” between the branches of the lawmaking power.
The presidential vetoes and congressional overrides related to partisan control of government as a “balance” between the branches of the lawmaking power.
The veto power does not provide the President the authority to edit or change the text of legislation; rather, it allows the President to accept or reject a whole act passed by Congress. The President, on the other hand, has the power to influence and shape legislation through the threat of veto. By
By threatening a veto, the President can encourage legislators to change the bill's content to make it more acceptable to the President. A veto can be overridden by Congress by approving the act with two-thirds support in both the House and Senate. (An act is usually passed with a simple majority.) This check prohibits the President from obstructing legislation when there is widespread support for it.
Learn more about veto, here:
https://brainly.com/question/31318139
#SPJ2
These professionals use the tools and methods of their profession to study words and language related to issues of the law:
Answers
The professionals who use the tools and methods of their profession to study words and language related to issues of the law are called legal luminaries.
Who is a professional lawyer?A professional lawyer or a legal luminary is a professional or expert who is:
Qualified to offer legal adviceRepresent someone in a law court.A lawyer can be addressed as:
An attorneyA solicitorA counselorA barrister.Thus, the professionals who use the tools and methods of their profession to study words and language related to issues of the law are called legal luminaries.
Learn more about the legal profession at https://brainly.com/question/16040577
#SPJ1
Answer:
These professionals use the tools and methods of their profession to study words and language related to issues of the law:
forensic linguists.
Explanation:
Edge 2022 Unit Test
An undergraduate course required for graduation has a reputation for being extremely
hard to pass, much harder than similar courses. When posting materials to the class
website, the teacher accidently posts a test with answers indicated at the end. The
teacher notices the error immediately and deletes the test, but before she does so a
student downloads the test. The website does not allow the teacher to see whether the
test was downloaded, and because she deleted the test with the answers so quickly, the
teacher later uploaded the same test without the answers and required students to take
the test. The Student Code of Ethics prohibits students from taking a test when there is
reason for them to believe they have confidential information regarding the answers to a
test they are not supposed to have. Violations of the Student Code of Ethics are
punishable.
Questions
What are the issues of integrity, ethics and law posed in the case study? What
options do the teacher and the student have, and what should they do and why?
Answers
The issue of integrity posed in the case study is that the student have seen the answers to the questions and the right thing to do is to report the issue to the right authority.
The issues of ethics posed in the case study is that students have to do the right thing and not violate of the Student Code.The issues of law posed in the case study is that students who have Violated the Student Code of Ethics are punishable and as such student should do the right thing.The other options the teacher have is to set new questions and other option the student have is to report the case before the examination date.What are ethics?The word ethic is also known as moral philosophy. It is one that is concerned with any situation or scenario that is morally good and bad.
Learn more about Ethics from
https://brainly.com/question/13969108
Brayden is ordering a taxi from an online taxi service. The taxi charges $2 just for the pickup and then an additional $1. 50 per mile driven. How much would a taxi ride cost if Brayden is riding for 4 miles?
Answers
The cost of the taxi ride if Brayden is riding for 4 miles, can be found to be $ 8.00.
How to find the cost of the ride ?The cost of the ride would be:
= Cost of pickup + Cost of each mile driven x 4
The cost of pickup = $ 2
Cost of each mile drive = $ 1. 50
The cost of the ride is therefore :
= Cost of pickup + Cost of each mile driven x 4
= 2 + ( 1. 50 x 4 )
= 2 + 6
= $ 8 .00
Find out more on cost at https://brainly.com/question/14953835
#SPJ4
Which statement best explains how Kayla can identify her purpose for writing? The word “research” suggests that her main purpose is to learn about the Civil War. The word “argument” suggests that her main purpose is to persuade, or present and defend a claim. The word “present” suggests that her main purpose is to entertain with interesting facts. The word “cause” suggests that her main purpose is to inform and educate.
Answers
Answer:
the answer is B) The word “argument” suggests that her main purpose is to persuade, or present and defend a claim.
Explanation:
have a good day
Answer:
B
Explanation:
When hcps use a cpt code for a more expensive service than performed this is example of
Answers
When healthcare providers use a Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code for a more expensive service than the one actually performed, it is an example of upcoding.
Upcoding refers to the practice of assigning a CPT code that represents a higher-cost or more complex service than what was actually performed. This practice can occur intentionally or inadvertently and may result in higher reimbursement rates or increased charges for the provided services. Healthcare providers may engage in upcoding for various reasons, such as maximizing reimbursement or inflating the perceived complexity of a procedure to justify higher charges. However, it is important to note that upcoding is considered fraudulent and unethical.
By using a CPT code that does not accurately reflect the service provided, healthcare providers may receive higher reimbursement from insurance companies or government programs. This can lead to financial gain for the provider at the expense of the payer, whether it is an insurance company or a government healthcare program. Hence, when healthcare providers use a CPT code for a more expensive service than the one performed, it is an example of upcoding, which is considered fraudulent and unethical.
Learn more about Current Procedural Terminology here:
https://brainly.com/question/28296339
#SPJ11