A college professor is curious if the location of seat in class affects grades in the class. They are teaching in a lecture hall with 240 students. The lecture hall has 10 rows, so they split the rows into 5 sections - Rows 1-2, Rows 3-4, Rows 5-6, Rows 7-8, and Rows 9-10. At the end of the course, they determine the top 25% of grades in the class, and if the location of the seat makes no difference, they would expect that these top 25% of students would be equally dispersed throughout the classroom. Their observations are recorded below. Run a Goodness of Fit test to determine whether or not location has an impact on the grade. Let α=0.05.
Hypotheses:
H0: Location in the classroom __________ impact final grade.
H1: Location in the classroom _________ impact final grade.
Select the best fit choices that fit in the two blank spaces above.

3600 in. is equal to 25 square feet, calculated using two unit multipliers.

To convert 3600 in. to square feet, there are two unit multipliers we can use: 1 ft/12 in and (1 ft/12 in)^2. Here's how to perform the conversion:

Multiply 3600 in. by 1 ft/12 in (the first multiplier) to convert inches to feet:

3600 in. × (1 ft/12 in) = 300 ft

Multiply 300 ft by (1 ft/12 in)^2 (the second multiplier) to convert square feet back to square inches:

300 ft × (1 ft/12 in)^2 = 3600 sq in.

Since you initially had 3600 sq in, which is equivalent to 25 sq ft (because 1 sq ft = 144 sq in), your final answer is:

3600 in. = 25 sq ft

Therefore, 3600 in. is equal to 25 square feet.

Learn more about unit multipliers

https://brainly.com/question/30304643

#SPJ11

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

Factors of 15 are 1, 3, 5, 15

Factors or 6 are 1, 2, 3, 6

HCF = 3

Based on the given information, where the Reproducibility result is 5% and the Repeatability result is 50%, it indicates that the majority of the variation in the measurement system is due to the repeatability component rather than the reproducibility component.

Re-examine and possibly revise the handling of the part to be measured: If the interaction between the operator and the part is identified as a significant source of variation, addressing this issue by re-evaluating and improving the part handling process can help reduce repeatability errors.

Investigation into the instrument: Validating the proper functioning and accuracy of the measuring instrument is crucial. An investigation should be conducted to ensure that the instrument is calibrated correctly and operating within acceptable specifications.

More training for the operators: Providing additional training and guidance to the operators can help improve their skills and reduce variations introduced by human factors. This includes ensuring they follow standardized measurement procedures, properly handle the equipment, and interpret the results accurately.

To know more about Reproducibility,

https://brainly.com/question/32341463

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

You want to know how to determine the y-intercepts of a rational function, and their possible number.

A rational function f(x) is the ratio of two polynomial functions p(x) and q(x):

  f(x) = p(x)/q(x)

As such, both numerator and denominator have single function values for any value of the independent variable. The y-intercept of f(x) is ...

  f(0) = p(0)/q(0)

The values of p(0) and q(0) are simply the constant terms in those respective functions.

The simple way to find the y-intercept is to look at the ratio of the constant terms in the polynomial functions making up the rational function. If that is defined, there is one y-intercept. If it is undefined (q(0)=0), then there are no y-intercepts.

<95141404393>

Answer:

Angle CAB

Step-by-step explanation:

Find the points that correspond to angle 2 and name them in order.

Answer:

\(\frac{1}{4}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

\(\frac{1}{2}\) = \(\frac{2}{4}\)  We need a common denominator before we can add.

\(\frac{2}{4}\) + \(\frac{-1}{4}\)  means the same thing as

\(\frac{2}{4}\) - \(\frac{1}{4}\) = \(\frac{1}{4}\)

Answer:

I guess its like this!!!!!!

1. The additive inverse of -7/4 is 7/4.

2. Melanie earned a total of $67.60 from her part-time jobs. The additive inverse of $67.60 is $-67.60.

The additive inverse of a number is the number that, when added to the original number, equals zero. In other words, the additive inverse of -7/4 is the number that, when added to -7/4, equals 0.

To find the additive inverse of -7/4, we can add 7/4 to -7/4. This gives us:

(-7/4) + (7/4) = 0

Therefore, the additive inverse of -7/4 is 7/4.

Melanie earned a total of $67.60 from her part-time jobs. The additive inverse of $67.60 is $-67.60. This means that if we add $-67.60 to $67.60, the result will be zero.

In other words, $-67.60 is the amount that, when added to $67.60, will leave Melanie with no money.

Learn more about additive inverse on

https://brainly.com/question/1548537

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

yes

option C is the correct answer. sin β = 15 / 17

Given data

Right angled triangle has sides

opposite = 15

adjacent = 8

Hypotenuse = 17

sin β = opposite / hypotenuse

substituting the values gives

sin β = 15 / 17

Read more on SOH CAH TOA here: https://brainly.com/question/20020671

#SPJ1

The probability of getting a head when a coin is flipped and the probability of getting an even number when a dice s rolled is 1/2.

So, the probability formula:

P(E) = Favourable events/Total events

Probability of getting heads:

P(E) = Favourable events/Total events

P(E) = 1/2

Probability of getting an even number:

P(E) = Favourable events/Total events

P(E) = 3/6

P(E) = 1/2

Therefore, the probability of getting a head when a coin is flipped and the probability of getting an even number when a dice s rolled is 1/2.

Know more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/28924396

#SPJ4

Answer:

D. 3

Step-by-step explanation:

sub 3 into problem you get a zero

Answer: A

Step-by-step explanation: I would say A because the angle is greater than 90 degrees

Answer:

We have supplementary angles.

76 + 3x + 2 = 180

3x + 78 = 180

3x = 102

x = 34

Answer:

y = 2.5x + 3

Step-by-step explanation:

y = mx + b

y = 2.5x + 3

As you can see, each unit is not 1, its 0.5. We need to go up 5 times, and so 0.5 times 5 gives us 2.5, and thats how i got my slope.

I got 3 as my y-intercept because it's were the line intersects the y axis.

Hope this helped!

Have a supercalifragilisticexpialidocious day!

Answer:

y=5x+3

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope: y2-y1 over x2-x1 so it will be 3-(-2) over 0-(-1) and the answer will be 5.

Y intercept: In order to find the y intercept it is necessary to replace the y an x coordinate in the equation: y= mx+b and replace 3=5(0)+b... simplifying would be 3=b

so the final answer would be y=5x+3

The principle that the coefficient of correlation is invariant with respect to the change of scale and the change of origin is a fundamental concept in statistics. It states that the value of the correlation coefficient remains unchanged when the scale or origin of the data is transformed.

To understand this principle, let's first define what the coefficient of correlation is. The coefficient of correlation, often denoted as r, measures the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables. It ranges from -1 to 1, where -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship, 1 indicates a perfect positive linear relationship, and 0 indicates no linear relationship.

The correlation coefficient between X' and Y will be the same as the correlation coefficient between X and Y. This is because scaling both variables by the same factor does not alter their relative positions or the strength of their linear relationship.

Similarly, if we apply a change of origin to either variable by adding or subtracting a constant value from each data point, it also does not affect the correlation between X and Y. The correlation coefficient remains unchanged.

The correlation coefficient between X' and Y will be the same as the correlation coefficient between X and Y. This is because shifting both variables by the same constant does not change their relative positions or the strength of their linear relationship.

The principle that the coefficient of correlation is invariant with respect to the change of scale and the change of origin holds true because correlation measures the linear relationship between variables rather than their absolute values or positions. It focuses on the pattern of association between variables rather than their specific numerical values.

In conclusion, scaling or shifting the variables by a constant factor or value does not alter their linear relationship. This principle is fundamental in statistical analysis and allows for meaningful comparisons and interpretations of correlation coefficients.

To know more about coefficient of correlation refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29978658#

#SPJ11

When 25 percent of doctors make less than $180k and 25% make more than $320k, a. Approximately 13.14% of physicians earn less than $200,000. and b. Approximately 7.75% of physicians earn between $280,000 and $320,000.

a. The fraction of physicians who earn less than $200,000 can be estimated using the given information as follows:

Let's denote the mean salary of physicians in this specialty by μ and the standard deviation by σ. Since the salaries are approximately normally distributed, we can use the properties of the standard normal distribution to solve this problem.

We know that 25% of the physicians earn less than $180,000, which means that their z-score (number of standard deviations from the mean) is: z = (180,000 - μ) / σ

Using a calculator, we can find the z-score corresponding to the 25th percentile, which is approximately -0.674. Therefore: -0.674 = (180,000 - μ) / σ

Similarly, we know that 75% of the physicians earn more than $180,000, which means that their z-score is: z = (320,000 - μ) / σ

Using the calculator, we can find the z-score corresponding to the 75th percentile, which is approximately 0.674. Therefore: 0.674 = (320,000 - μ) / σ

Solving these two equations simultaneously, we can find μ and σ:

μ = $250,000

σ = $53,333

Now, to find the fraction of physicians who earn less than $200,000, we need to calculate the z-score corresponding to this salary: z = (200,000 - μ) / σ = -1.125

Using the calculator, we can find that the fraction of physicians who earn less than $200,000 is approximately 0.1314.

b. The fraction of physicians who earn between $280,000 and $320,000 can be estimated using the same method as above. We need to calculate the z-scores corresponding to these salaries:

z1 = (280,000 - μ) / σ = 0.596

z2 = (320,000 - μ) / σ = 0.674

Using the calculator, we can find the area between these two z-scores, which represents the fraction of physicians who earn between $280,000 and $320,000. This area is approximately 0.0775.

To know more about percent, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29014288#

#SPJ11

Answer: Longest side too short

Step-by-step explanation:

32, 42, 52=16, 21, 26

16^2+21^2=26^2

256+441>676

Too Short(woomp, woomp)

Answer:

-4+-5+-7=-16

Step-by-step explanation:

On solving the provided question, by properties of parallel lines we got to know that -  1 - A  2 - C  3 - B  4 - D

When two or more lines cross the intersection line, alternate exterior angles result. These angles are created on a number of sides outside the transverse lines. Any two parallel lines that cross one another create two angles with the horizontal line. In the area between the parallel lines, interior angles are formed, while alternate exterior angles are formed in the area outside the parallel lines.

Matches are -When two parallel lines cross one other, the horizontal line is divided into two angles. Interior angles develop between the parallel lines, whereas alternative outside angles develop outside the parallel lines.

1 - A

2 - C

3 - B

4 - D

To know more about alternate exterior angles visit:

brainly.com/question/2279752

#SPJ1

\(answer \\ = - 2 , 2 ,3 , 4 \\ explanation \\ let \: r \: be \: a \: relation \: from \: a \: to \: b. \: then \: \\ the \: set \: of \: first \: components \: or \: the \\ set \: of \: elements \: of \: a \: are \: called \\ domain \: and \: the \: set \: of \: second \\ components \: or \: the \: set \: of \: elements \\ of \: b \: are \: called \: the \: range. \\ hope \: it \: helps\)

total price : amount = individual price

6.57:5=1.31

Answer:

X=Y

Z=M

Y=N

Step-by-step explanation:

The truth value of proposition 2a, [(x ⊃ a) • (b ⊃ ∼ y)] ⊃ [(b ∨ y) • (a ⊃ x)], given that a and b are true and x and y are false, is TRUE.

In the provided scenario where a and b are true while x and y are false, proposition 2a, [(x ⊃ a) • (b ⊃ ∼ y)] ⊃ [(b ∨ y) • (a ⊃ x)], is evaluated to be true. Let's break it down to understand why.

The proposition is in the form of an implication (⊃), where the antecedent is [(x ⊃ a) • (b ⊃ ∼ y)] and the consequent is [(b ∨ y) • (a ⊃ x)]. To determine the true value, we need to examine both the antecedent and the consequent.

In the antecedent, we have two conditions connected by a conjunction (∧): (x ⊃ a) and (b ⊃ ∼ y). Since x and y are false, the condition (x ⊃ a) is vacuously true because false implies anything. Similarly, (b ⊃ ∼ y) is also true because b is true, and ∼ y (not y) is true since y is false. Therefore, the antecedent is true.

Moving on to the consequent, we have two conditions connected by a conjunction (∧): (b ∨ y) and (a ⊃ x). In this case, b is true, so (b ∨ y) is true regardless of the truth value of y. Additionally, a is true, and since x is false, (a ⊃ x) is false. Therefore, the consequence is false.

Now, when we evaluate the entire proposition, [(x ⊃ a) • (b ⊃ ∼ y)] ⊃ [(b ∨ y) • (a ⊃ x)], we find that a true antecedent implies a false consequent, which results in a true overall proposition. Hence, the truth value of proposition 2a is TRUE in the given scenario.

In conclusion, proposition 2a holds true when a and b are true, and x and y are false. Understanding the evaluation of logical propositions like these can help in reasoning and problem-solving tasks.

Learn more about Truth Value

at brainly.com/question/9051197

#SPJ11

The given infinite series  cn\((x-a)^{n}\)= co + ci(x-a) + c₂(x-a)²+... in the form cn (x-a)^n is a power series.

A power series is a series of the form Σ cn \((x-a)^{n}\), where cn are constants, (x-a) represents the variable, and n is a non-negative integer. The power series represents a function that is defined as an infinite sum of terms involving powers of (x-a).

In a power series, each term corresponds to a specific power of (x-a), and the coefficients cn determine the contribution of each term to the overall function. By adjusting the coefficients, the power series can represent a wide range of functions.

Power series are commonly used in calculus and mathematical analysis to approximate and represent functions. They are particularly useful for functions that can be represented by their derivatives, as the coefficients cn can be determined using the derivatives of the function at a specific point.

In summary, the given series cn\((x-a)^{n}\) is a power series, which represents a function as an infinite sum of terms involving powers of (x-a) with coefficients cn.

Learn more about power series here:

https://brainly.com/question/28158010

#SPJ11

Strengths Finder 2.0 is a valuable tool that can help individuals identify and develop their unique strengths. By leveraging these strengths, individuals can achieve greater success in their personal and professional lives, and organizations can create a more positive and productive work environment.

Strengths Finder 2.0 is a popular survey tool that helps individuals identify their unique strengths and talents. The survey has been completed by 10 million people to date and has been adopted by many universities and organizations to assist individuals in identifying their strengths.

The survey consists of a series of questions designed to assess an individual's natural talents and abilities. The results are then used to provide personalized feedback and coaching on how to leverage those strengths in their personal and professional lives.

The use of Strengths Finder 2.0 has become increasingly popular in recent years as individuals and organizations recognize the importance of focusing on strengths rather than weaknesses. By identifying and developing their strengths, individuals can improve their performance, increase their engagement and job satisfaction, and achieve greater success in their careers.

Organizations that use Strengths Finder 2.0 have reported increased productivity, employee engagement, and retention rates. By providing employees with the tools and resources to develop their strengths, organizations can create a more positive and fulfilling work environment.

Learn more about Strengths Finder 2.0

brainly.com/question/28493038

#SPJ11

Answer:

m= -2/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Use the slope formula to find the slope m .

Answer:

-2.

Step-by-step explanation:

f(0) = 0^2 + 8(0) - 2

= -2.

Answer:

- 5 , - 3 , 3

Step-by-step explanation:

to find the first three terms, substitute n = 1, 2, 3 into the explicit formula

\(T_{n}\) = 2n² - 4n - 3

T₁ = 2(1)² - 4(1) - 3

    = 2(1) - 4 - 3

    = 2 - 7

    = - 5

T₂ = 2(2)² - 4(2) - 3

    = 2(4) - 8 - 3

    = 8 - 11

    = - 3

T₃ = 2(3)² - 4(3) - 3

    = 2(9) - 12 - 3

    = 18 - 15

    = 3

the first three terms are - 5, - 3 , 3