8 4/5 - 2/3 - blank = 3 1/10

Answer: 31.41592654 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

C = pi (d)

C = pi (10)

C = 31.41592654 inches

We are given that the inside diameter of a piston ring is a random variable with mean value 10 cm and standard deviation 0.07 cm.

We are asked to find the sampling distribution of the sample mean diameter for two different random samples of n=16 and n=64 piston rings, respectively, and to calculate the standard deviation of each sampling distribution.

The sampling distribution of the sample mean diameter is the distribution of all possible sample means that could be obtained from a given sample size n.

The central limit theorem tells us that for large enough sample sizes (typically n ≥ 30), the sampling distribution of the sample mean is approximately normal, regardless of the shape of the underlying population distribution.

The mean of the sampling distribution of the sample mean is equal to the population mean, and the standard deviation of the sampling distribution is equal to the population standard deviation divided by the square root of the sample size.

For the first random sample of n=16 piston rings, the center of the sampling distribution of the sample mean diameter is still 10 cm, as this is the population mean.

However, the standard deviation of the sampling distribution is equal to the population standard deviation of 0.07 cm divided by the square root of 16, which is 0.0175 cm. Therefore, the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the sample mean diameter for the first random sample is 0.0175 cm.

For the second random sample of n=64 piston rings, the center of the sampling distribution of the sample mean diameter is still 10 cm, but the standard deviation of the sampling distribution is equal to the population standard deviation of 0.07 cm divided by the square root of 64, which is 0.00875 cm.

Therefore, the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the sample mean diameter for the second random sample is 0.00875 cm.

Finally, we are asked which of the two random samples is more likely to have a sample mean diameter within 0.01 cm of 10 cm. Since the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the sample mean decreases as the sample size increases, the second random sample of n=64 piston rings is more likely to have a sample mean diameter within 0.01 cm of 10 cm.

This is because the decreased variability of the sampling distribution means that the sample means are more tightly clustered around the population mean of 10 cm. Therefore, we can conclude that the second random sample is more precise than the first random sample.

In statistics, a random sample is a subset of a larger population that is selected in such a way that each member of the population has an equal chance of being included in the sample.

Random sampling is a crucial tool for drawing conclusions about a population based on a smaller subset of data. In this problem, we will explore the sampling distribution of the sample mean for two different random samples of piston rings.

To know mare about random sample refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29852583#

#SPJ11

The expression that represents the approximate area of the circle in square inches is 226.08 square inches. So, none of the given options are correct.

To find the approximate area of the circle, we can use the fact that the sum of the areas of the equal sectors is equal to the area of the circle. Each sector is formed by dividing the circle into 8 equal parts, so each sector represents 1/8th of the total area of the circle.

The base of the parallelogram is given as 9.42 inches, and the height is given as 3 inches. Since the opposite sides of a parallelogram are equal, the length of the other side of the parallelogram is also 9.42 inches.

To find the area of the parallelogram, we can multiply the base by the height: 9.42 inches * 3 inches = 28.26 square inches.

Since the parallelogram is formed by arranging the equal sectors of the circle, the area of the parallelogram is equal to 1/8th of the area of the circle.

Therefore, the approximate area of the circle can be found by multiplying the area of the parallelogram by 8: 28.26 square inches * 8 = 226.08 square inches. So, none of the given options are correct.

For more such questions on circle

https://brainly.com/question/28162977

#SPJ8

The starting amoun of fuel was 18.36 gallons

The final amount was 3.9 gallons

To know how much fuel Lena used you have to calculate the difference between what she had at the beginning of the day and what was left at the end of it:

18.36-3.9= 14.46

Lena spent 14.46gallons of fuel.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

j+47=55

find j

j=55-47

j=8

Answer: J + 47 = 55, J= 8

Step-by-step explanation:

J + 47 = 55

Subtract 47 from both sides of the equation

J = 8

7 gallons are needed to cover 1241 square feet.

In this question,

Each gallon of porch and deck paint covers 200 square feet.

To find out how many gallons of paint needs, we have to divide the total area of deck by the amount of deck that one gallon covers.

We use the unitary method to find out how many gallons of paint needs.

Using unitary method,

1241 / 200 = 6.205

However, we cannot buy a fraction of a gallon of paint.

So, the amount of gallons of paint needed is approximately equal to 7 gallons.

Therefore, 7 gallons are needed to cover 1241 square feet.

Learn more about the unitary method here:

https://brainly.com/question/22056199

#SPJ4

if i tell you the truth i dont even know

Answer:1

Step-by-step explanation:

The line crosses in the y intercept at the 1 place

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Table for function 1,

         x                      y              Difference 1          Difference 2        

         2                    10                      -                             -

         3                     1                 1 - 10 = -9                     -

         4                    10                10 - 1 = 9                9 - (-9) = 18

         5                    37               37 - 10 = 27            27 - 9 = 18

         6                    82               82 - 37 = 45          45 - 27 = 18

Since, difference 2 is common as 18,

Table will represent a quadratic function.

Table for function 2,

        x                    y               Difference 1            Difference 2

        5                    16                       -                               -

        6                    19              19 - 16 = 3                        -

        7                    28             28 - 19 = 9                  9 - 3 = 6

        8                    43             43 - 28 = 15              15 - 9 = 6

        9                    64             64 - 43 = 21              21 - 15 = 6

Since, difference 2 is common as 6,

Table will represent a quadratic function.

Table for function 3,

        x                    y                   Ratio

        1                   112                     -

        2                  56               56 ÷ 112 = \(\frac{1}{2}\)  

        3                  28               28 ÷ 56 = \(\frac{1}{2}\)

        4                   14               14 ÷ 28 = \(\frac{1}{2}\)

        5                    7                7 ÷ 14 = \(\frac{1}{2}\)

Since, ratio is common as \(\frac{1}{2}\).

Table will represent an exponential function.

Answer:

Line SU is 16

Step-by-step explanation:

ST + TU = SU

7 + 9 = 16

You add 9 and 7 to get 16.

To find the equation of a line parallel or perpendicular to a given line through a point, determine the slope and substitute the point's coordinates into the slope-intercept form.



To find the equation of a line parallel or perpendicular to a given line through a specific point, follow these steps:

1. Determine the slope of the given line. If the given line is in the form y = mx + b, the slope (m) will be the coefficient of x.

2. Parallel Line: A parallel line will have the same slope as the given line. Using the slope-intercept form (y = mx + b), substitute the slope and the coordinates of the given point into the equation to find the new y-intercept (b). This will give you the equation of the parallel line.

3. Perpendicular Line: A perpendicular line will have a slope that is the negative reciprocal of the given line's slope. Calculate the negative reciprocal of the given slope, and again use the slope-intercept form to substitute the new slope and the coordinates of the given point. Solve for the new y-intercept (b) to obtain the equation of the perpendicular line.

Remember that the final equations will be in the form y = mx + b, where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept.Therefore, To find the equation of a line parallel or perpendicular to a given line through a point, determine the slope and substitute the point's coordinates into the slope-intercept form.

To learn more about intercept click here

brainly.com/question/29142047

#SPJ11

The value for the hotspots of the similar triangles ∆ABC and ∆PWR are:

(1). angle B = 68°

(2). PQ = 5cm

(3). BC = 19.5cm

(4). area of ∆PQR = 30cm²

Similar triangles are two triangles that have the same shape, but not necessarily the same size. This means that corresponding angles of the two triangles are equal, and corresponding sides are in proportion.

(1). angle B = 180 - (22 + 90) {sum of interior angles of a triangle}

angle B = 68°

Given that the triangle ∆ABC is similar to the triangle ∆PQR.

(2). PQ/7.5cm = 12cm/18cm

PQ = (12cm × 7.5cm)/18cm {cross multiplication}

PQ = 5cm

(3). 13cm/BC = 12cm/18cm

BC = (13cm × 18cm)/12cm {cross multiplication}

BC = 19.5cm

(4). area of ∆PQR = 1/2 × 12cm × 5cm

area of ∆PQR = 6cm × 5cm

area of ∆PQR = 30cm²

Therefore, the value for the hotspots of the similar triangles ∆ABC and ∆PWR are:

(1). angle B = 68°

(2). PQ = 5cm

(3). BC = 19.5cm

(4). area of ∆PQR = 30cm²

Read more about similar triangles here:https://brainly.com/question/14285697

#SPJ1

A binary relation on Z that fails to exhibit reflexivity, anti-reflexivity, symmetry, anti-symmetry, and transitivity can be defined as follows:

Let R be a relation on Z, where,

R = {(x, y) | x is an even integer and y is an odd integer}.

This relation is not reflexive because for any integer x, the pair (x, x) does not belong to R, as x can only be either even or odd, but not both simultaneously.

Similarly, this relation is not anti-reflexive since there exist elements in Z that are related to themselves. For example, (2, 2) is not in R, indicating a violation of antireflexivity.

Moreover, this relation is not symmetric because if (a, b) is in R, it does not necessarily imply that (b, a) is also in R. For instance, (2, 3) is in R, but (3, 2) is not.

Likewise, this relation is not anti-symmetric because there exist distinct integers a and b such that both (a, b) and (b, a) are in R. An example is the pair (2, 3) and (3, 2) both being in R.

Lastly, this relation fails to satisfy transitivity since there are integers a, b, and c for which (a, b) and (b, c) are in R, but (a, c) is not in R. For instance, (2, 3) and (3, 4) are both in R, but (2, 4) is not.

Hence, the relation R = {(x, y) | x is an even integer and y is an odd integer} on Z demonstrates a lack of reflexivity, anti-reflexivity, symmetry, anti-symmetry, and transitivity.

Learn more about binary relations:

brainly.com/question/31686713

#SPJ11

Answer:

3 to the 3rd power

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

whhehrbehruejfhjwjrjehrurh3hdhehehehd4bdhehwh

The numerical length of the line segment FG is 10 units.

An equation is an expression that shows the relationship between two or more numbers and variables. An independent variable is a variable that does not depend on other variables while a dependent variable is a variable that depends on other variables.

Point G is on FH, hence:

FH = FG + GH

Given that GH = 8, FH = 3x + 3, FG = 2x, hence:

3x + 3 = (2x) + 8

x = 5

FG = 2x = 2(5) = 10

The numerical length of the line segment FG is 10 units.

Find out more on equation at: https://brainly.com/question/2972832

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The width of a confidence interval estimate of the population mean widens when there is increased variability in the sample data or a lower level of confidence desired by the researcher. It is also influenced by the sample size, where larger sample sizes tend to result in narrower confidence intervals.

A confidence interval is a range of values that is likely to contain the true population mean with a certain level of confidence. The width of the confidence interval is determined by several factors. One important factor is the variability in the sample data. When there is greater variability, it means that the individual observations in the sample are spread out over a wider range. This increased spread leads to a wider confidence interval because it becomes more difficult to estimate the population mean accurately.

Another factor affecting the width of the confidence interval is the desired level of confidence. A higher level of confidence, such as 95% or 99%, requires a wider interval to provide a greater assurance of capturing the true population mean. On the other hand, a lower level of confidence, like 90%, allows for a narrower interval but with a reduced level of certainty.

Additionally, the sample size plays a crucial role in determining the width of the confidence interval. A larger sample size tends to yield a more precise estimate of the population mean, resulting in a narrower confidence interval. This is because larger samples provide more information about the population and reduce the impact of random variation in the data.

In summary, the width of a confidence interval estimate of the population mean widens when there is increased variability in the sample data or a lower level of confidence desired by the researcher. Conversely, a smaller variability, higher confidence level, and larger sample size lead to narrower confidence intervals.

Learn more about confidence interval here: brainly.com/question/32546207

#SPJ11

Answer:

18 in

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

18 in

Step-by-step explanation:

1 ft = 12 in

Hioe this helps. Pls give brainliest.

Answer:

In Jan - 13,759

In Feb - 9,854

In both - 23,613

Step-by-step explanation:

hope it helps

Answer:

oml not u making me do math

Step-by-step explanation:

not u making me do math

Stocks and bonds in order from highest default risk to lowest default risk: 4) preferred stock, municipal bond, and US bond

The order from highest default risk to lowest default risk is:

So the answer is 4) preferred stock, municipal bond, and US bond.

For more such questions on Default risk: brainly.com/question/17149209

#SPJ4

The measure of each angle is 113.4 and 66.6 degrees

Let one of the angle be x

The measure of its supplement will be 180 - x

If the angle measures 46.8° more than the measure of its supplementary angle, this is expressed as:

x = 180 - x + 46.8

x + x = 180 + 46.8

2x = 226.8

x = 226.8/2

x = 113.4 degrees

Other angle = 180 - 113.4

Other angle = 66.6 degrees

Hence the measure of each angle is 113.4 and 66.6 degrees

Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/14941189

Using induction on the number of nodes, we can prove that a Hamiltonian circuit always exists in a connected graph where every node has a degree of 2. The proof involves establishing a base case and then demonstrating the inductive step to show that the claim holds for any number of nodes.

We will use mathematical induction to prove the statement.
Base Case: For a graph with only three nodes, each having a degree of 2, we can easily construct a Hamiltonian circuit by connecting all three nodes in a cycle.
Inductive Step: Assume that for a graph with n nodes, where n ≥ 3, every node has a degree of 2, there exists a Hamiltonian circuit. Now, let's consider a graph with (n + 1) nodes, where each node has a degree of 2. We can select any node, say node A, and follow one of its edges to another node, say node B. Since node A has a degree of 2, there exists another edge connected to node A that leads to a different node, say node C. We can remove node A and its incident edges from the graph, resulting in a graph with n nodes. By the inductive assumption, we know that this reduced graph has a Hamiltonian circuit. Now, we can connect node B and node C to complete the Hamiltonian circuit in the original graph.
By establishing the base case and demonstrating the inductive step, we have shown that a Hamiltonian circuit always exists in a connected graph where every node has a degree of 2, regardless of the number of nodes in the graph.

Learn more about inductive step here
https://brainly.com/question/30074862



#SPJ11

The generating function for the sequence {an} is given by a(x) = (1 + 2x) / (1 - x - 6x^2). It captures the terms of the sequence {an} as coefficients of the powers of x.

To find the generating function of the sequence {an}, we can use the properties of generating functions and solve the given recurrence relation.

The given recurrence relation is: an = an-1 + 6an-2

We are also given the initial conditions: a0 = 1 and a1 = 3.

To find the generating function, we define the generating function A(x) as:

a(x) = a0 + a1x + a2x² + a3x³ + ...

Multiplying the recurrence relation by x^n and summing over all values of n, we get:

∑(an × xⁿ) = ∑(an-1 × xⁿ) + 6∑(an-2 × xⁿ)

Now, let's express each summation in terms of the generating function a(x):

a(x) - a0 - a1x = x(A(x) - a0) + 6x²ᵃ⁽ˣ⁾

Simplifying and rearranging the terms, we have:

a(x)(1 - x - 6x²) = a0 + (a1 - a0)x

Using the given initial conditions, we have:

a(x)(1 - x - 6x²) = 1 + 2x

Now, we can solve for A(x) by dividing both sides by (1 - x - 6x^2²):

a(x) = (1 + 2x) / (1 - x - 6x²)

Therefore, the generating function for the given sequence is a(x) = (1 + 2x) / (1 - x - 6x²).

Read more on Functions here: https://brainly.com/question/29890699

#SPJ11

Based on the chi-square test, there is no significant evidence to suggest that the die is not balanced.

We have,

To determine if the die is balanced, we can perform a chi-square test of goodness of fit.

The null hypothesis is that the die is balanced, and the alternative hypothesis is that the die is not balanced.

First, let's calculate the expected frequencies for each outcome assuming the die is balanced. Since there are 180 tosses in total, each outcome is expected to have an equal probability of 1/6.

Expected frequency for each outcome

= (Total tosses) x (Probability of each outcome)

Expected frequency for each outcome = (180) x (1/6)

Expected frequency for each outcome = 30

Now, we can calculate the chi-square test statistic using the formula:

χ² = Σ [(Observed frequency - Expected frequency)² / Expected frequency]

Let's calculate the chi-square test statistic:

χ² = [(28 - 30)² / 30] + [(36 - 30)² / 30] + [(36 - 30)² / 30] + [(30 - 30)² / 30] + [(27 - 30)² / 30] + [(23 - 30)² / 30]

χ² = [(-2)² / 30] + [(6)² / 30] + [(6)² / 30] + [(0)² / 30] + [(-3)² / 30] + [(7)² / 30]

χ² = 4/30 + 36/30 + 36/30 + 0/30 + 9/30 + 49/30

χ² = 134/30

χ² ≈ 4.467

Next, we need to compare the calculated chi-square value to the critical chi-square value at a significance level of 0.01 and degrees of freedom equal to the number of outcomes minus 1 (6 - 1 = 5).

Looking up the critical chi-square value in a chi-square distribution table with 5 degrees of freedom and a significance level of 0.01, we find it to be approximately 15.086.

Since the calculated chi-square value (4.467) is less than the critical chi-square value (15.086), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, we do not have sufficient evidence to conclude that the die is not balanced at a 0.01 level of significance.

Thus,

Based on the chi-square test, there is no significant evidence to suggest that the die is not balanced.

Learn more about the chi-square test here:

https://brainly.com/question/30760432

#SPJ1

The value(s) of λ such that the vectors v1 and v2 are linear dependent is (are): λ = 3 and λ = -1.

To find the value(s) of λ such that the vectors v1 and v2 are linearly dependent, we need to check if one of the vectors is a scalar multiple of the other. In other words, we need to see if we can find a non-zero scalar k such that:
v2 = k*v1
Expanding this equation, we get:
(2 - λ, -8, -4) = k*(-2 - 2λ, -4, -2)
Simplifying the right-hand side, we get:
(-2k - 2kλ, -4k, -2k)
Equating the corresponding components of both sides, we get a system of three equations:
2 - λ = -2k - 2kλ
-8 = -4k
-4 = -2k
Solving the second and third equations, we get:
k = 2
k = -2
Substituting these values of k into the first equation, we get:
2 - λ = -2(2) - 2(2)λ (for k = 2)
2 - λ = -2(-2) - 2(-2)λ (for k = -2)
Simplifying both equations, we get:
λ = 3
λ = -1

To know more about linear dependent visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/30884648

#SPJ11