A judge that makes a legal decision on a case today may look at past case law and follow the concept of stare decisis.
Stare decisis, which means "to stand by things decided," is a legal principle that directs judges to adhere to the precedent established by previous court decisions. It is based on the idea that consistency and predictability in the law are crucial for maintaining a fair and stable legal system.
When a judge is faced with a new case, they may review similar cases from the past that have addressed similar legal issues. By examining these precedents, the judge can gain insight into how prior courts have interpreted and applied the law in similar situations. The judge then applies these precedents to the current case to maintain consistency in the legal interpretation and ensure fairness in the decision-making process.
Stare decisis serves several important purposes. First, it promotes uniformity in the law by requiring judges to follow established legal principles and decisions. This consistency enhances predictability and allows individuals and businesses to make informed decisions based on settled legal standards.
Second, stare decisis contributes to judicial efficiency by relying on existing legal precedents. Rather than starting from scratch with each new case, judges can draw on the wisdom and rationale provided by previous court decisions, saving time and resources.
know more about stare decisis here:
https://brainly.com/question/30455267
#SPJ11
________ powers exist when both state and national governments possess a certain level of authority.
A. Expressed
B. Reserved
C. Concurrent
D. Implied
E. Police
Option (c), When both the state and the federal governments have a certain amount of power, there are concurrent powers.
What exactly does "shared concurrent power" between the federal and state governments entail?Concurrent powers are those that the federal and state governments both possess. This includes the power to impose taxes, build roads, and set up lower courts.
How much authority does the federal government have compared to the states?The federal system of governance with state governments sharing power is known as federalism. All states are subject to national jurisdiction, but states are only sovereign inside their own borders. The American Revolution is where federalism first emerged.
What additional obligations does the government have?Concurrent responsibilities include writing legislation, putting it into effect, keeping track of it, and evaluating performance, for instance. Housing, agriculture, social welfare, and education are among the matters that fall under the joint jurisdiction of the federal and provincial administrations.
Learn more about concurrent powers: https://brainly.com/question/2459928
#SPJ1
a systematic compilation of written law is best described as
A systematic compilation of written law is best described as a code, also known as a legal code.
What’s an event that involves matter and energy
a courts decision establishes what type of law?
Answer:
The law that has been evolved from the decisions made in appellate courts and judicial precedent, is known as common law or sometimes as case law. The common law system gives pre-eminence to the common law, as it considers unfair to treat the same facts in a different manner in different situations.
Which of the following is not self-authenticating?
A signed letter that is dated from twelve years ago, that transfers title of land.
A copy of the official Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) record of payment of taxes, certified by the manager of the regional IRS office.
An inventory record for a lumber company which has been properly certified as a business record under hearsay exception 803(6).
An article from the New York Times newspaper.
The document that is not self-authenticating is a signed letter that is dated from twelve year that transfers title of land.
What is a self-authenticating document?In the legal sphere and under the law of evidence, a self-authenticating document refers to any document that can be admitted into evidence at a trial without proof being submitted to support the claim that the document is what it appears to be.
In this context, the examples of a self-authenticating document are:
A copy of the official Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) record of payment of taxes, certified by the manager of the regional IRS office.An inventory record for a lumber company which has been properly certified as a business record under hearsay exception 803(6).An article from the New York Times newspaper.Read more about self-authenticating document
brainly.com/question/14699348
#SPJ1
Please use caucion when entering this area as the floor can be slippary.
Why do people sometimes do things that they really don’t want to do? Check all that apply.
Group of answer choices
don’t know how to get out of the situation
don’t want to hurt someone’s feelings
they have strong confidence in themselves
want to be liked
Answer:
1/2/4
Explanation:
What is the name of the legislature of the federal government of the united states of america?.
Answer:The answer is the united states congress
Answer:
The United States Congress
Explanation:
Established by Article I of the Constitution, the Legislative Branch consists of the House of Representatives and the Senate, which together form the United States Congress.
Which was a compromise between northern and Southern states at the Constitutional Convention?
Agreement achieved with in United States Transitional Government (1787) by representatives as from Northern and Southern states who multipled the slave population is known as the "three-fifths compromise."
Which issue was at the heart of one of the concessions struck by northern and southern states in during 1787 Constitutional Convention?Its 1787 Constitutional Convention saw a contentious dispute between states that wanted community number of representatives and others who demanded equal representation, which led to the creation of The Great Compromise.
Why did compromise between the North and the South become impossible by 1860?The Senate rejected the convention's recommendations by a vote of 28 to 7. Early in 1861, efforts to reach a settlement failed because doing so would have required its Conservative Movement to renounce its foundational tenet—the opposition to the spread of slavery into the west.
To know more about Northern and Southern states Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14079520
#SPJ1
Some police terminology has become part of mainstream slang. True or False?
Answer:
true beacuse there always part of the mainstream
when polly the puppy escaped her fenced-in yard, her owner, jane, posted a reward for her safe return. what type of contract was jane creating?
Answer: Jane is creating a Bilateral contract
Which of the following is NOT a goal of the 2001 Convention on Cybercrime agreed to by the members of the Council of Europe in 2001?
providing mutual aid in support of each country’s investigations into computer and Internet crime
aligning the major elements of each country’s cybercrime laws
the immediate deportation of anyone suspected of committing a
cybercrime from the country of their capture to the country where the crime was committed
establishing fast and efficient methods of assuring mutual cooperation in the investigation of cybercrime
The immediate deportation of anyone suspected of committing a cybercrime from the country of their capture to the country where the crime was committed is not goal of 2001 Convention on Cybercrime.
What is cybercrime?Cybercrime refers to criminal activities that are carried out using digital technologies or the internet. It can take many forms, including hacking, phishing, identity theft, malware attacks, and online scams. Cybercriminals often target individuals, businesses, and governments to steal sensitive information, money, or other valuable assets. They may use various techniques to exploit vulnerabilities in computer systems or trick people into giving up their personal information. Cybercrime can have serious consequences, including financial losses, reputational damage, and even physical harm. It is a growing threat in today's increasingly digital world, and it is essential to take steps to protect yourself and your organization against cyber attacks.
To learn more about cybercrime, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/23988092
#SPJ1
An enlisted Sailor selected for Chief Warrant Officer can take the Navy-Wide Advancement Exam when what event occurs?
An enlisted Sailor selected for Chief Warrant Officer can take the Navy-Wide Advancement Exam when they have been officially promoted to Chief Warrant Officer 2 (CWO2).
This promotion typically occurs after the Sailor completes the necessary training and meets the requirements for the Chief Warrant Officer program. Once they have been promoted to CWO2, they become eligible to take the Navy-Wide Advancement Exam, which is a test that assesses their knowledge and skills in their respective field.
The exam is a crucial step in their career advancement as it determines their eligibility for promotion to higher ranks within the Chief Warrant Officer program. Therefore, it is essential for the Sailor to prepare adequately for the exam to increase their chances of success and further their career progression in the Navy.
For more question on eligibility
https://brainly.com/question/26504786
#SPJ11
Please really need help on this please
Imagine the federal government has a national debt of $12. 6 trillion. Congress's budget for the coming year includes a spending projection of $5. 1 trillion. Tax revenue is expected to be $4. 8 billion. Which fiscal policy should congress adopt to avoid increasing the national debt?.
Given that tax revenue is expected to be less than spending for the coming year, congress should adopt a fiscal policy of austerity in order to avoid increasing the national debt.
This would involve reducing government spending in order to bring it in line with tax revenue. This would likely involve making cuts to government programs and services, which could be controversial and politically difficult to implement.
However, it would be necessary in order to avoid adding to the already large national debt.There are a few options that Congress could adopt to avoid increasing the national debt. One option would be to cut spending by $300 billion. This could be done by reducing the budget for each government department and agency.
Another option would be to increase taxes by $300 billion. This could be done by increasing the marginal tax rates for individuals and businesses, or by instituting new taxes. Finally, Congress could adopt a combination of spending cuts and tax increases to avoid increasing the national debt.
Learn more about national debt at : https://brainly.com/question/22684204
#SPJ4
What is your idea for a bill?
Write 1000 words about Employment law in UK by using Gibbs
Reflective model.
The Gibbs Reflective model is used to develop a structured approach to learning from practical experience. It encourages a clear description of the situation, analysis of feelings, evaluation of the experience, analysis to make sense of the experience, and a plan of action to be taken.
Employment law in the UK using Gibbs Reflective Model Description: The topic that has been chosen is employment law in the UK. Employment law is a branch of law that deals with the legal rights and responsibilities of employers and employees. It governs the relationship between the two parties and sets out the terms and conditions of employment. This topic is relevant because employment law plays a significant role in ensuring that workers' rights are protected and that employers are held accountable for their actions. The situation being described is the current state of employment law in the UK, including the legal framework, statutory provisions, and case law. The situation is complicated, and there are many legal issues that employers and employees need to be aware of.
Feelings: Studying employment law in the UK can be overwhelming. It is a complex subject that requires careful analysis and understanding. At first, it was challenging to get to grips with the legal jargon and the technical aspects of employment law. However, after taking time to read through the relevant materials, I felt more confident and able to engage with the topic in a meaningful way.
Evaluation: The experience of studying employment law in the UK has been eye-opening. I have learned a great deal about the legal framework, statutory provisions, and case law. I have also gained an appreciation for the importance of employment law in protecting workers' rights and ensuring that employers are held accountable for their actions. One of the key takeaways from this experience is that employment law is constantly evolving, and it is important to stay up to date with the latest developments.
Analysis: Employment law in the UK is complex and multifaceted. There are many legal issues that employers and employees need to be aware of, including discrimination, harassment, and whistleblowing. One of the key challenges in this area is ensuring that workers' rights are protected while balancing the needs of employers. Employers must ensure that they comply with the law and that they do not discriminate against employees based on their age, gender, race, or religion. Employees, on the other hand, have a duty to work in good faith and to act in the best interests of their employer.
Plan of Action: To gain a better understanding of employment law in the UK, I plan to continue to read and research the topic. I will also seek out opportunities to engage with experts in the field and attend relevant events and seminars. By doing this, I hope to develop a deeper understanding of the legal framework, statutory provisions, and case law in this area of law. Additionally, I plan to use this knowledge to help educate others about their rights and responsibilities under employment law in the UK.
In conclusion, employment law in the UK is a complex and multifaceted area of law that requires careful analysis and understanding. The Gibbs Reflective model provides a useful framework for learning from practical experience and developing a structured approach to the topic. By using this model, it is possible to gain a deeper understanding of the legal framework, statutory provisions, and case law in this area of law.
Learn more about Gibbs Reflective model at: https://brainly.com/question/17512540
#SPJ11
Explain hedges for politically-imposed risk as contrasted to
those for risk arising from foreign-exchange fluctuations.
Hedges for politically-imposed risk and those for risk arising from foreign-exchange fluctuations are two distinct strategies used by businesses to mitigate different types of risks.
Hedges for politically-imposed risk are designed to protect against adverse events resulting from political actions or decisions that may impact a company's operations or investments. These risks can include changes in government regulations, policies, taxation, or geopolitical events. To hedge against politically-imposed risk, businesses may employ strategies such as diversifying their operations across multiple countries, establishing joint ventures or partnerships with local entities, or purchasing political risk insurance. These measures aim to reduce the potential negative impact of political changes on the company's financial performance and stability.
On the other hand, hedges for risk arising from foreign-exchange fluctuations are focused on managing the volatility in currency exchange rates. Businesses that engage in international trade or have operations in different countries are exposed to the risk of currency fluctuations, which can impact their revenues, costs, and profitability. To hedge against this risk, companies may use financial instruments such as forward contracts, options, or currency swaps to lock in exchange rates for future transactions or to offset potential losses resulting from adverse currency movements. These hedging strategies help businesses minimize the uncertainties and potential financial losses associated with foreign-exchange fluctuations.
In conclusion, hedges for politically-imposed risk and hedges for risk arising from foreign-exchange fluctuations are distinct strategies used by businesses to manage different types of risks. While politically-imposed risk hedges focus on mitigating the impact of political actions and decisions, hedging against foreign-exchange fluctuations aims to manage the volatility in currency exchange rates. Employing appropriate hedging strategies for each type of risk can help businesses safeguard their financial performance and enhance their ability to navigate uncertain and challenging environments.
To know more about Hedges , visit
https://brainly.com/question/29350137
#SPJ11
t is important for a licensee or broker to remove ambiguity when a seller's unclear decision could be discriminatory by forcing the seller to
Answer: Articulate his or her concerns
Explanation:
If the concerns are founded in bias, you can take action to remove or overcome the bias or repudiate any support for it. On the other hand, the sellers' concern may be the product of considerations or impressions which you or your sponsoring broker can either clear up or explain in non-discriminatory terms.
allow bartenders and bar owners to be held liable for a plaintiff’s injury although the bartender or bar owner did not directly cause the plaintiff’s injury.
In some cases, bartenders and bar owners can be held liable for a plaintiff's injury even if they did not directly cause the injury. This is typically known as "dram shop liability" or "social host liability."
Dram shop liability refers to the legal responsibility of a bar or restaurant that serves alcohol to a visibly intoxicated person who then causes harm to others. In these cases, the bar or restaurant can be held liable for the injuries caused by the intoxicated person.Social host liability, on the other hand, applies to individuals who host private parties or events where alcohol is served.
If a host continues to serve alcohol to a visibly intoxicated guest who subsequently causes harm to others, the host can be held responsible for the injuries.The basis for holding bartenders and bar owners liable in these situations is the recognition of their duty to exercise reasonable care in serving alcohol and preventing harm to others. By serving alcohol to a visibly intoxicated person, they may be seen as contributing to the person's impairment and the resulting harm caused.
It's important to note that dram shop liability laws vary by jurisdiction, so the specific rules and standards may differ depending on the state or country. It is recommended to consult local laws and legal professionals for specific guidance in a particular jurisdiction.
To know more about liability visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31356106
#SPJ11
as a judge in france, maurice is not allowed to interpret the law but relies on a strict set of codes to determine the outcome of a case. which type of law is in place in france? group of answer choices common law system civil law system mixed law system tribal law system theocratic law system
As a judge in France, Maurice is not allowed to interpret the law but relies on a strict set of codes to determine the outcome of a case. A type of law that is in place in France is known as civil law system. The Option B is correct.
What does civil law system mean?Civil law systems, also known as continental or Romano-Germanic legal systems, are found on all continents and cover approximately 60% of the global territory. They are based on Roman law concepts, categories, and rules, with some influence from canon law, and are sometimes supplemented or modified by local custom or culture.
The civil law tradition, despite being secularized over the centuries and emphasizing individual freedom, promotes human cooperation. Civil law, in its technical, narrow sense, refers to the law that governs people, things, and the relationships that develop between them, excluding not only criminal law but also commercial law, labor law, and so on.
Read more about civil law system
brainly.com/question/15049771
#SPJ1
Rulemaking is the process by which laws or mandates approved by legislatures are turned into detailed written instructions on what public agencies will or will not do. True or False
True. Rulemaking is the process by which government agencies implement and enforce laws or mandates passed by legislatures.
It involves the creation of detailed written instructions on how these laws will be put into practice and what actions will be taken by public agencies to ensure compliance. This process typically involves public notice and comment periods, during which interested parties can provide input on the proposed rules before they are finalized. Once the rules are established, they have the force of law and can be enforced by the agency responsible for implementing them. Rulemaking is an important part of the regulatory process, as it ensures that laws are implemented fairly and consistently across different agencies and jurisdictions. It also provides transparency and accountability by allowing for public input and review of agency actions. Overall, rulemaking plays a critical role in the functioning of our government and helps to ensure that laws are effectively implemented and enforced.
Learn more about government :
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ11
In order to affect laws, the Supreme Court must
A. Create and pass a law
B. Order the President to write and opinion
C. Write and opinion regarding a court case
D. Issue a general proclamation
Answer:
A create and pass a law
Explanation:
So what you want to do every question is take out the ones that dont make sence. Then you need to look what did you go over. Then you can start to get ride of answer if you aren't sure.
I hoped this helps you have a nice day!!
As a judge, Qiana applies common law rules. These rules develop from
A. Statutes enacted by Congress and the state legislatures
B. Uniform laws drafted by legal scholars
C. Regulations issued by administrative agencies
D. Decisions of the courts in legal disputes
As a judge, Qiana applies common law rules. These rules develop from Decisions of the courts in legal disputes. Option D is the correct answer.
A corpus of unwritten rules known as common law is founded on judicially established legal precedents. When there are no written principles of law or applicable legislation, common law is used to guide decision-making in exceptional situations. Option D is the correct answer.
The precedents that apply in a certain case are decided by the judge sitting over it. Cases heard in subordinate courts must follow the example set by higher courts. This structure encourages uniformity and stability in the American judicial system. Lower courts may, however, decide to change or depart from precedents if they are out of date or if the present case differs significantly from the previous case. Though this seldom happens, lower courts have the option to reject the precedent.
Learn more about Laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/25368237
#SPJ4
Which of the following is NOT true about the statute of frauds?
a.
The Statute of Frauds applies to real estate transactions.
b.
Two pieces of paper can be used together to make up the necessary writing.
c.
Both parties must sign the contract.
d.
A note or memorandum may be sufficient to satisfy the writing requirement.
The statement that is not true about the statute of frauds is d.A note or memorandum may be sufficient to satisfy the writing requirement.
What is Statute of Frauds?As implied by its name, the Statute of Frauds was established to stop deception in parties' oral agreements. Emails can occasionally fulfill the criteria for an enforceable contract. Certain contracts are subject to the Statute of Frauds, which lists the conditions under which it may be binding.
A statute of frauds is a type of law that mandates that specific agreements must be recorded in writing, signed by the party against whom they are to be enforced, and with enough detail to support the agreement.
Therefore, option D is correct.
Learn more about statute of frauds at:
https://brainly.com/question/29990570
#SPJ1
Which of the following amendments concern bail for arrested suspects?
Group of answer choices
Answer:
it might be amendment 4 or 6
Explanation:
Do you think issues like: Marriage rights and Abortion ought to be decided by: (1)Supreme Court (and therefore apply to ALL Americans the same), (2) have State Legislators vote and decide, or (3) have the voters in each state decide these issues? (There are three options here. Pick one and defend it against the other two.)
Please help
What do you understand by the terms ‘Law’ in general and ‘Business law in particular’?
Answer:
Laws are binding rules that relate to the conduct of individuals and businesses and are designed to prescribe obligation or duty and enforce justice. ... Business owners must follow all regulations and laws to avoid fines. Vacationers and visitors to other countries should understand and respect local laws.
Explanation:
Business law is the law that governs what happens with commercial matters, and there are two main types: regulation of commercial entities and regulation of commercial transactions. Laws have evolved over centuries, and have had to adapt to changes in technology and society.
How is a student loan different from a scholarship? A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back. A scholarship must be paid back, but a student loan is not paid back. A student loan is a form of financial aid, but a scholarship is not. A scholarship is a form of financial aid, but a student loan is not.
Student loan different from a scholarship because: A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back.
Student Loan and scholarshipStudent loan can be defined as borrowing or lending money to cover your school expenses while scholarship is a financial aid or financial assistance to cover your school expenses.
When you borrowed money you are expected to payback but when it comes to scholarship you are not expected to pay back because the money given to you was free.
Inconclusion Student loan different from a scholarship because: A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back.
Learn more about Student Loan and scholarship here:https://brainly.com/question/488893
People living on rivers in Canada are entitled to have the water come to them in undiminished quality and quantity. This is an expression of what kind of rights?
Answer:
People living on rivers in Canada are entitled to have the water come to them in undiminished quality and quantity. This is an expression of what kind of rights?A) natural lawB) riparian rightsC) real property rightsD) strict liability rightsE) environmental rights
Explanation:
it's RIPARIAN RIGHTS
MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST THANK YOU