5. Given the facts in the above question, assume that Emily had informed Henry that she would never accept any offer to perform for less than $500. Royal Theatre offered to pay Emily $400. Has Henry violated any duties to Emily if he does not inform her of the offer? (2)

It is possible to classify Katelyn's behaviour as intentional infliction of emotional distress.

A tort (a type of civil wrong) known as intentional infliction of emotional distress is when someone purposefully or recklessly causes severe emotional distress to another person. Physical assault, threats, humiliation, or other extreme and outrageous behaviour are just a few examples of this type of behavior's many manifestations. To prove intentional infliction of emotional distress, the victim must show that the defendant's actions were extreme and outrageous, that the defendant intended to cause severe emotional distress, and that the victim actually suffered severe emotional distress as a result. It can be challenging to establish that a defendant intentionally caused emotional distress, and there must be solid proof that their actions were both deliberate and unreasonable.

To learn more about tort visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14614720

#SPJ1

Political Science helps to shape political knowledge and values by preparing students for effective citizenship and political participation.

Political Science is the scientific study of politics and power dynamics.

Studying political science creates an understanding of the following concepts:

Other ideas learned through political science include political groupings, classes, government, diplomacy, law, strategy, and war.

Thus, Political Science helps to shape political knowledge and values by preparing students for effective citizenship and political participation.

Learn more about political science at https://brainly.com/question/1269822

#SPJ1

The founder of modern utilitarianism, which holds that actions are morally right if they tend to promote happiness or pleasure among all those affected by them, was a philosopher, economist, jurist, and legal reformer Jeremy Bentham.

Even though he was a strong supporter of expanding individual legal rights, he opposed natural law and natural rights, which are both thought to have a "divine" or "God-given" origin, and referred to them as "nonsense upon stilts." Legal fiction was harshly criticized by Bentham as well.

The founder of modern utilitarianism, which holds that actions are morally right if they tend to promote happiness or pleasure (and morally wrong if they tend to promote unhappiness or pain) among all those affected by them, was a philosopher, economist, jurist, and legal reformer Jeremy Bentham.

Bentham recognized that, regardless of the overall cost to the community, rulers sought to advance their own happiness rather than the greatest happiness of those who were under their control.

To learn more about Jeremy Bentham refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/1085669

#SPJ4

Answer:

False they are overrepresented

Explanation:

In the speech, Chavez draws attention to certain characteristics, traits, and actions of King. These include King's commitment to nonviolence, his belief in the power of love and justice.

Chavez highlights King's unwavering commitment to nonviolence as a powerful means of achieving social change. He emphasizes King's belief that love and justice can overcome hatred and oppression, and that nonviolent resistance is a potent force for transformative action.

Chavez also underscores King's pivotal role in the civil rights movement, his tireless efforts to dismantle racial segregation and discrimination, and his advocacy for voting rights and economic justice.

Additionally, Chavez acknowledges King's exceptional oratory skills, his ability to deliver impassioned speeches that resonated with people across racial and socio-economic divides, and his capacity to inspire and mobilize individuals to join the struggle for equality and freedom. Overall, Chavez pays tribute to King's moral leadership, vision, and indomitable spirit in the fight for civil rights and social justice.

Learn more about discrimination here: brainly.com/question/14896067

#SPJ11

Owners of preferred stock often do not hold the freedom to sell their stock on the open market. Thus, option C is correct.

Preferred stockholders have just some benefits like voting rights, claiming dividends over ordinary stockholders, and distribution of liquidation. When it comes to company assets, they stand for the last time but they can convert their shares to stocks at any time.

Preferred stocks are very less liquid than ordinary stocks, which means they have more restrictions to sell any stock in the open market. The lack of liquidity is the major cause that differentiates preferred stock from common stocks.

To learn more about Preferred stocks

https://brainly.com/question/32397116

#SPJ4

Answer:

I think he may be guilty and I'm not to sure how much money they would have to pay to be bailed out

Explanation: I think he's guilty because, he said he wouldn't know what marijuana looks like but that is false because he is a farmer and there's a 80% percent chance he's had to deal with it. ( You would also need to know more about his farming business and a lot more accusations because if you're wrong then you can ruin someone's life)

Answer:

The difference between common sense and science. Plainly stated common sense is information gathered from everyday knowledge and science is thorough research on a particular subject with concluded facts.

The reason for science prevailing over common sense is because its​ uses conceptual schemes and theoretical structures while common sense has no structure to it,

Basically, a common sense means a conventional intelligence that people gathered from everyday situations, events etc.

Science mean a knowledge about our world based on facts learned through numerous experiments,  observation etc.

In conclusion, the reason for science prevailing over common sense is because its​ uses conceptual schemes and theoretical structures while common sense has no structure to it.

Read more about Science

brainly.com/question/17216882

Answer: generating

Explanation:

From the question, we should note that the information that is taken from the existing classified source and generated into another form, such as video, DVD, or a CD is referred to as an example of generating.

It should be noted that "generating" is quite different from "extracting" which has to do with the information that are taken directly from a classified source that's already existing in a new document.

Answer:

No it's of course false it do not have

The statement that motorcyclists have half of the rights and responsibilities on public roadways as automobile drivers is false because they have same rights and responsibilities.

Motorcycle ownership is a privilege rather than a right. If you don't keep your end of the contract, you can suffer dire penalties, including physical harm or even death. If they want to continue riding, motorcycle riders must fulfil a number of obligations, such as:

To know more about motorcyclist rights and responsibilities  https://brainly.com/question/1510975

#SPJ2

Answer:

What is the Health and Safety at Work Act? The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (HASAWA) is an important piece of legislation for workplaces in the UK. It ensures that all employers provide a safe working environment and look out for the health of their employees—wherever their place of work.

The aim of the Health and Safety at Work Act of 1974  was to  ensure the health, safety and welfare of people at work.

The Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 (HASAWA) is a United Kingdom law that lays down the general duties of employers, employees and others to ensure the health, safety and welfare of people at work. The act's main aim is to protect the health, safety and welfare of people in the workplace by ensuring that risks are managed and controlled.

The act applies to all workplaces and work activities in the UK and covers a wide range of topics, including the provision of information and training, the use of personal protective equipment, and the maintenance of safe systems of work.

Find out more on the Health and Safety at Work Act at https://brainly.com/question/14364473

#SPJ1

B: granted, because the jury could find that being hit in the face with an umbrella constitutes adequate provocation.

The act of taking someone else's property without permission, such as the defendant taking the customer's five-dollar bill, is considered theft and is a crime. However, whether the defendant's actions that led to the customer's death constitute murder or voluntary manslaughter is a separate issue.

Voluntary manslaughter is a type of homicide that involves the unlawful killing of another person in the heat of passion or upon a sudden quarrel. The key factor in a voluntary manslaughter charge is the presence of adequate provocation. Adequate provocation is defined as something that is sufficient to deprive a person of the power of self-control and cause a reasonable person to lose their capacity for discretion and self-control.

In this case, the defendant argues that he acted in the heat of passion after being hit in the face with an umbrella. If the jury finds that this constitutes adequate provocation, then they could potentially find the defendant guilty of voluntary manslaughter rather than murder. Therefore, B) is the correct answer.  

Learn more about manslaughter

https://brainly.com/question/6228473

#SPJ4

In the Classical world, the political and personal realms were deeply interconnected, with the actions and decisions of individuals having significant implications on both spheres. The intertwining of politics and personal life can be observed in various Classical societies, including Persia, Rome, Athens, and Early Christianity.

In Persia, the political world was closely tied to personal life through the concept of kingship. The Persian king, known as the Shah or Emperor, held absolute power and was considered the embodiment of divine authority. Personal loyalty and obedience to the king were highly valued, and failure to demonstrate loyalty could result in severe consequences. The personal lives of individuals were therefore heavily influenced by their allegiance to the political order, as any perceived disloyalty could lead to loss of status, exile, or even execution. Similarly, in Rome, personal life was intertwined with politics, particularly among the ruling elite. The concept of "mos maiorum" emphasized the importance of upholding traditional Roman values and social norms. The political success and reputation of individuals often depended on their adherence to these societal expectations in their personal conduct, such as maintaining strong family ties, demonstrating virtuous behavior, and fulfilling public duties. Personal scandals or moral transgressions could have detrimental effects on one's political standing and aspirations for office.In Athens, personal life was also political in nature, especially for male citizens who actively participated in the democratic system. Athenian citizens were expected to engage in public affairs, attend assemblies, and serve in various civic roles. The political participation of individuals was closely tied to their personal reputation and honor within the community. The ability to deliver persuasive speeches, form alliances, and gain the trust of fellow citizens played crucial roles in shaping one's political influence. Additionally, decisions made within the family unit, such as the selection of marriage partners or the upbringing of children, could have political implications, as alliances and connections formed through familial ties could influence political networks.
In Early Christianity, personal life was intertwined with politics through the establishment of a distinct religious community with its own moral codes and expectations. Early Christians faced persecution and oppression from the Roman Empire, which sought to suppress the growth of this new religious movement. The personal beliefs and practices of Christians often clashed with the dominant political and social norms of the time, leading to conflicts and tensions. Personal decisions to adhere to Christian teachings, participate in communal rituals, or openly identify as Christians were inherently political acts that challenged the established order.
Overall, in the Classical world, the political and personal spheres were intimately connected. Loyalty to rulers, adherence to societal norms, political participation, and religious affiliations all influenced personal lives and vice versa. The examples of Persia, Rome, Athens, and Early Christianity demonstrate the complex interplay between politics and personal life, highlighting how individual actions and choices carried broader political significance in these societies.

To know more about Classical world, click here https://brainly.com/question/5338138

#SPJ11

The presence of collateral can affect the interest rate on a bond in the following ways:

1. Collateral can lower the interest rate on a bond: When collateral is provided, the risk associated with the bond decreases. This means that the investor's investment is secured by the collateral in the event that the issuer defaults on the bond. This reduction in risk may lead to a lower interest rate on the bond.

2. Collateral can increase the interest rate on a bond: On the other hand, if the collateral is of low quality, it may not be as valuable in the event of a default. In this case, investors may demand a higher interest rate to compensate for the additional risk associated with the bond.

3. No collateral can increase the interest rate on a bond: When there is no collateral backing a bond, the bond is considered to be unsecured. This means that the investor's investment is not secured by any assets.

As a result, investors may demand a higher interest rate to compensate for the additional risk associated with the bond.

The "Petition" Clause of the First Amendment protects the rights of citizens to petition the government for change and to peacefully assemble.

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees several fundamental freedoms, including freedom of speech, religion, the press, and the right to peacefully assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances.

The Petition Clause specifically safeguards the right of individuals and groups to address the government, voice their concerns, and seek changes in public policy. It enables citizens to formally request action, express their opinions, and engage with government officials through written or oral means.

The right to peacefully assemble is also protected by the First Amendment. This guarantees the freedom of individuals to gather together, whether in public or private spaces, for expressive purposes, political activities, or to advocate for particular causes or concerns.

These rights are essential components of a democratic society, fostering civic engagement and allowing citizens to have a voice in shaping government policies and decisions.

Learn more about Petition here

https://brainly.com/question/32455266

#SPJ11

The condemnation of private property for public use is allowed under the state's right of eminent domain. The correct answer is A.

The government has the power to take private property for public use under the principle of eminent domain, which is also known as the state's right of condemnation. This power is granted to the government through the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which requires that the government provide just compensation to the property owner.

This power allows the government to acquire land for public purposes such as building roads, schools, parks, and other public facilities that benefit the community as a whole. However, the government must follow a legal process to exercise this power, and property owners have the right to challenge the government's decision and the compensation offered.

Option A holds true.

Learn more about eminent domain: https://brainly.com/question/2093245

#SPJ11

Answer:

Employment income has always consists of amounts you received as salary , wages , commissions .

Employment income is usually shown in box 14 of your T4 slips.

The racial inequality that was prevalent in America's past has remain across the ethnic lines of today and we can see from the incidents from the various incidents that took place in America. Even though great leaders have fought for the inequality still we could identify such acts for instance during the George Floyd's case.

Racial inequality in a society refers to the unequal distribution of resources, power, and economic opportunity across races. While the discussion of racial inequality in the United States is often focused on economic inequality, racial inequality manifests itself in a variety of ways that impact the well-being of all Americans both individually and collectively. This includes disparities in wealth, education, employment, housing, mobility, health, incarceration rates, and other areas.

Learn more about inequality, here:

https://brainly.com/question/28774329

#SPJ4

Yes, it is true that unless otherwise posted, a speed limit of 100 kilometers per hour (kph) (62 miles per hour (mph)) applies to all vehicles on all highways and roads in Germany.

However, it is important to note that there are some exceptions to this rule. For example, some sections of the Autobahn, Germany's famous highway system, do not have a specific speed limit posted.

In these areas, drivers are expected to use their judgment and adjust their speed based on weather conditions, traffic volume, and other factors.

Additionally, there are some areas where specific speed limits are posted due to safety concerns, such as near construction zones or in residential areas. It is important for drivers to pay attention to signage and adjust their speed accordingly in order to ensure their safety and the safety of others on the road.

To know more about speed limit visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29632218

#SPJ11

Answer:

to have a law declared unconstitutional

Explanation:

Jane Roe sued the state of Texas because she wanted to have a law declared unconstitutional.

Jane Roe fought for the right for an abortion which was covered under the right to privacy.

Howver,, because the Texas law prohibits abortion, the case between her  and the state led to the Supreme court for final ruling.

Therefore, the Option D is correct.

Read more about Jane Roe case

brainly.com/question/10184794

Answer:

you can earn up to a maximum of four credits per year.

Explanation:

Answer: Heyaa! ~

Explanation:

     Up to a maximum of four credits per year.

         ^                    Plus More  +                 ^

Hopefully this helps you!~

Answer:

Monetary policy is the process by which the monetary authority of a country, generally the central bank, controls the supply of money in the economy by its control over interest rates in order to maintain price stability and achieve high economic growth.

Answer:

hmmmm.... okay so I should try this too see if im.right but I'm trying to do law school

The city's main local resource to protect against the threat of both domestic and international terrorism in New York City is the NYPD Counterterrorism Bureau (CT).

The CT Bureau evaluates potential terrorist targets, creates cutting-edge, proactive policies and procedures to ward off assaults, trains first responders and specialized units, and builds intelligence capabilities for identifying and preventing terrorist attacks. In order to obtain and share intelligence, the bureau works in concert with various federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies. It also actively participates in the FBI's Joint Terrorist Task Force. The NYPD offers safety and peace of mind to millions of residents, workers, and visitors throughout the five boroughs of New York City, seven days a week, as it is the largest, best-trained, most efficient, and most advanced law enforcement department in the country.

Learn more about terrorist here:

https://brainly.com/question/15203676

#SPJ4

The matching law suggests that the reinforcement schedules used for behavior modification should be based on the principle of matching Therefore, the answer is: a. Concurrent

which means that the relative rate of reinforcement for different behaviors should match the relative rate of occurrence of those behaviors. This principle applies to concurrent schedules of reinforcement. In addition to concurrent schedules of reinforcement, the matching law also has implications for two other types of reinforcement schedules used in behavior modification:

Ratio Schedules: Ratio schedules involve reinforcing a behavior based on the number of times the behavior is performed. The matching law suggests that the ratio of reinforcement should match the ratio of behavior. For example, if a particular behavior occurs more frequently than another behavior, it should receive a higher rate of reinforcement.

Interval Schedules: Interval schedules involve reinforcing a behavior based on the passage of time or the first occurrence of the behavior after a certain time interval has elapsed. The matching law suggests that the duration of the interval should match the relative occurrence of the behavior. If a behavior occurs more frequently during a specific time interval, it should receive a higher rate of reinforcement within that interval.

To learn more about  reinforcement

brainly.com/question/5162646

#SPJ4

Criminal law is a set of laws related to a crime. Nobody will be prosecuted as no law law states that a foreigner must be saved.

Abe, the father of a drowning child, has a legal and moral obligation to try to save his child's life if he can do so without harm. However, he could be charged with manslaughter, If he decides to act.

Christie is presently in-charge. However, she could be charged with murder; If not, she could be charged with manslaughter or manslaughter, If he intended to kill the girl.

Chin doesn't appear to have committed any crimes. Hannah may have a moral obligation to act because she can probably save a drowning girl without putting herself in peril, but in utmost countries there's no legal obligation to save a foreigner.

-Felonious law prescribes behavior considered hanging , dangerous or else hanging the property, health, safety and moral security of people, including himself.

Question:

Abe takes his son Jill and his musketeers Christie and Chin to the lake. While stomping onto the wharf, Christie Chin deliberately bumps into Jill, knocking her into the water. Jill lands awkwardly and sinks to the ground. Chin pushes Christie down, ignoring the temblors. Hannah, an bystander and swimming expert, gapes at Christie but does nothing differently. Abe confronts the group and asks them to do something. However, will any of the substantiations be fulfilled? Should any of them be held responsible? explain your answer.

To know more about Criminal Law,

brainly.com/question/30000330

#SPJ4

Answer:

yes we evolved from monkeys

Explanation:

The right answer will be "Constructivist". A further explanation is provided below.

Learn more about Constructivist here:

https://brainly.com/question/14923615

To ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is the largest transportation agency of the U.S. government and regulates all aspects of civil aviation in the country as well as over surrounding international waters. Where as the Maritime Administration is the agency within the U.S. Department of Transportation dealing with waterborne transportation. Its programs promote the use of waterborne transportation and its seamless integration with other segments of the transportation system, and the viability of the U.S. merchant marine. At times these both agencies work along with U.S. Customs towards crime prevention from the routes the are entrusted with. These agencies hold joint exercises and searches along with U.S. Customs to ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports

To know more about Crime Prevention:

brainly.com/question/14495855

#SPJ1

Answer:  The correct answer is to ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports

Explanation:  This answer has been confirmed correct.