Answer:
B
Explanation:
so far and sadly if it is your only option and speeding up isn't one
in the context of proving actual malice in a defamation lawsuit, reckless disregard for the truth or falsity of a statement is present when the defendant publishes an article claiming the public figure did a bad thing:
Actual malice is the legal requirement imposed on specific defamation plaintiffs when filing a lawsuit for libel or slander, and will be found where a defendant publishes or communicates a false statement with knowledge of its falsity or reckless disregard for its veracity.
#SPJ1
What was the law that required men of certain ages to serve in the military?.
Answer:
selective service act
Explanation:
congress passed the selective service act into law wich required men in the U.S. between ages 21 and 30 to register for military service.
A conditional can be true even if it’s consequent is false
True or False?
A conditional can be true even if it’s consequent is false
True or False?
✏️AnswerFalseErik owns a successful auditing firm. His business thus stores and manages sensitive financial information of several clients. He wants to protect such data with the help of better passwords and limit general access to sensitive database. Which of these private security personnel should Erik approach for such advice?
A. a security contractor
B. a private investigator
C. a security guard
D. a personal guard
E. a police officer
If Erik wants to protect sensitive financial information stored in his auditing firm, he should approach a security contractor for advice on implementing better passwords and limiting general access to the sensitive database. The correct option is A.
What are auditing and its importance?To ensure that all departments are using a documented system of documenting transactions, an auditor must examine or inspect multiple books of accounts in addition to physically examining inventory. It is done to check the correctness of the financial statements that the organization provides.
Security contractors are trained professionals who specialize in providing a range of security services, including security consulting, risk assessment, security design, and security technology implementation.
A private investigator typically conducts investigations and gathers information related to legal, financial, and personal matters, and may not have the specific expertise in information security and data protection that Erik requires.
Thus, the ideal selection is option A.
Learn more about auditing firms here:
https://brainly.com/question/17138829
#SPJ3
4
Officer's discretion arrest policies mean:
Select the best answer
Officers are required to arrest both parties
It is up to the officer whether to make an arrest
Officers should make an arrest when there is
probable cause of domestic violence
Officers are encouraged to make an arrest
What would be the hardest thing to deal with when you are a forensic scientist, collecting evidence or securing a crime scene? And what would be the most interesting part?
Answer:
the hardest thing to deal with is people that are with you will sometimes get your head messed up so make sure your partner is someone who can help you
Arson fires and, in particular, arson homicides allow for a warrantless crime scene search in most jurisdictions, but it is your experience that a warrant is always better. Instruct your personnel in what the appropriate initiation of the investigation should be. o To avoid issues with evidence collection,
what do you think should be done about the scene? Explain.
Who should be brought in immediately? Why?
• Where should you look for the owner of the property? Why?
Arson fires and, in particular, arson homicides allow for a warrantless crime scene search in most jurisdictions, but warrants are always better in order to avoid illegal and unauthorized acts by officers due to unnecessary powers.
I would instruct the personnel subordinate to take warrants for the arrest of people unless it is a extraordinary situation and for maintaining public order it is necessary to do warrantless crime scene search. Doing this will improve the quality of investigative operations as warrant caries with it a sense of accountability for the officials. The habitual offenders of the area and security personnel should be brought in immediately as they are the closest suspects of crime in first instance.
For the owners of property, officials should look around the same places to escape as during arson, human instinct allows a person to find the safest place to survive the crisis.
To know more about Arson:
brainly.com/question/11857936
#SPJ1
Can you find the similarities between republic government and democracy?
Answer: Similarities between republic government and democracy are that the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives or is ruled by representatives of the citizen body.
Explanation: I hope this helps :)
Plz tell me if it was wrong so i can Fix it :)
You are approaching an intersection and are preparing to turn right with a green light. You should slow down, signal your turn and
Answer: look both sides before taking the turn
Explanation:
which of the following is not true of couples who cohabitate before marriage as compared to those who do not live together
Cohabiting couples, as a whole, have the same level of commitment to each other and the relationship that married couples do is not true of couples who cohabitate before marriage as compared to those who do not live together.
Regarding the levels of commitment between married couples and cohabiting couples, studies are not unanimous. Cohabiting couples may be less committed and more likely to end their relationship than married couples, according to some studies, while married couples may be more committed overall.
Additionally, research suggests that couples who live together before getting married are more likely to get divorced than those who do not. It is crucial to remember that every person's situation is unique, so generalizations about cohabitation shouldn't be made based on them.
The question is incomplete, complete question is "Which of the following is NOT a reason why an older person might choose to cohabit rather than marry?
cohabiting couples are more likely than married couples to split up because of conflicts about money
Cohabitation is most common among people with lower levels of education and income
Most cohabiting relationships do not last longer than two years
Cohabiting couples, as a whole, have the same level of commitment to each other and the relationship that married couples do"
Learn more about Cohabiting couples at:
brainly.com/question/31749142
#SPJ4
States and localities have the most discretion in establishing policy when federal funding is derived from.
Answer:
A federal mandate
States and localities have the most discretion in establishing policy when federal funding is derived from a federal mandate The Americans with Disabilities Act, which provides protections for the disabled, is an example of shifting the responsibilities and costs for many programs to state governments
Explanation:
In no less than 200-words, describe how you would craft a new policy that allowed officers to determine if individuals were plotting terrorist acts or carrying concealed weapons.
Answer:
In no less than 200-words, describe how you would craft a new policy that allowed officers to determine if individuals were plotting terrorist acts or carrying concealed weapons.
Explanation:
Significantly, a person holding a state-issued permit allowing the person to acquire or possess firearms (e.g., a concealed weapons permit) is not required to undergo a background check if the permit was issued: (1) within the previous five years in the state in which the transfer is to take place; and (2) after an authorized government official has conducted a background investigation to verify that possession of a firearm would not be unlawful.13 Permits issued after November 30, 1998 qualify as exempt only if the approval process included a NICS check.14
what did political theorist john stuart mill argue for? A. freedom from government B. free traffic of ideas C. free love D. free access to healthcare
Political theorist John Stuart Mill argued for B. free traffic of ideas.
Mill believed in the importance of individual liberty and freedom of expression. He argued that individuals should be free to express their ideas and opinions without interference from the government or other authorities.
This freedom of expression, or "free traffic of ideas," is essential for the pursuit of truth and the development of society. Mill also believed that this freedom should extend to all aspects of life, including religion, politics, and personal relationships.
However, he did recognize the need for some limits on individual liberty, such as when one's actions harm others.
Hence Option B is correct.
For more similar questions on liberty:
brainly.com/question/30191259
#SPJ11
credit repair organizations are now subject to federal law and disclosure requirements. True or false?
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Credit repair businesses are governed by federal law and must make certain disclosures. The Credit Repair Organizations Act (CROA) is a federal statute that governs credit repair businesses. It establishes certain requirements and provisions that credit repair companies must follow when providing services to clients. The legislation compels these organizations to give customers with specific disclosures, such as information about their services, fees, and consumer rights. It also forbids some misleading activities and gives consumers certain rights and remedies in the event of a breach. As a result, credit repair companies MUST follow these federal rules and disclosure standards.
what is the purpose of the pre-trial conference in a civil case? group of answer choices add members to a class action suit settle a case without having to go to trial have parties answer interrogatories depose witnesses
The main purpose of a pre-trial conference in a civil case is to settle the case without having to go to trial. It provides an opportunity for the involved parties to resolve the matter efficiently and often less expensively.
During a pre-trial conference, parties discuss the nature of the case, identify key issues, and often explore the possibility of settlement. The judge, lawyers, and parties involved in the case attend this meeting. It aids in simplifying the proceedings by identifying the main issues in dispute, eliminating unnecessary claims or defenses, and discussing possibilities for agreement. If a settlement is not reached, the conference can also help in planning the trial, including a plan for discovery and setting a trial date. By facilitating conversation and negotiation, the pre-trial conference can lead to a resolution without the need for a full trial, saving time, money, and resources.
Learn more about pre-trial conferences here:
https://brainly.com/question/13055704
#SPJ11
what is the function of courts in American society? Needs to be 5 sentences
Answer:
Courts decide what really happened and what should be done about it. They decide whether a person committed a crime and what the punishment should be. They also provide a peaceful way to decide private disputes that people can't resolve themselves.As the final arbiter of the law, the Court is charged with ensuring the American people the promise of equal justice under law and, thereby, also functions as guardian and interpreter of the Constitution.Within the federal system, there are three primary types of federal courts: 94 District Courts (trial courts), 13 Courts of Appeals (intermediate appellate courts), and the United States Supreme Court (the court of final review).What is the cost/benefit analysis that is used to help make decisions?
Discuss the pros and cons of raising children in correctional institutions. How you expand or limit such programs?
Answer:
Explanation:
While systemic reforms ultimately rely on government policies and action, individuals can play a role as well. Initiatives such as the Harvard Organization for Prison Education and Reform and the Petey Greene Program, for example, send trained volunteers to tutor incarcerated individuals with the dual goal of advocating for structural reforms to prison education. Volunteering to tutor students in prison who are working toward their GEDs will reap rewards for students, tutors, and society.
Which of the following statements is true?A) When actual demand exceeds a reasonable error, it should be investigated to discover the cause of the error.B) Forecast error does not need to be measured.C) Forecasts do not need to be tracked.D) All of the above are true.E) None of the above is true.
When actual demand exceeds a reasonable error, it should be investigated to discover the cause of the error is the true statement. (A)
Forecast error refers to the difference between predicted demand and actual demand. It is essential to measure forecast error to determine the accuracy of the forecast and identify any patterns or biases that may be present.
When the actual demand exceeds a reasonable error, it is an indication that there may be issues with the forecast, such as incorrect assumptions or inadequate data. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate the cause of the error to make necessary adjustments and improve the forecast's accuracy in the future. (A)
Forecasts should also be tracked regularly to identify trends and patterns, evaluate the effectiveness of forecasting methods, and make any necessary adjustments to ensure accurate predictions.
To know more about Forecast error click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/15173326#
#SPJ11
are there two types of addiction, psychological
and physical.
Answer:
this is true√
Explanation:
Bob consigned all of his stock holdings to the court as collateral against pretrial flight. What type of bail did he post?
It appears that Bob posted a type of bail known as collateral bail. This is a type of bail where the accused deposits property, such as stock holdings, as collateral with the court in exchange for release from jail before trial.
Collateral bail is often used when the accused is deemed to be a flight risk and the court wants to ensure that they will not flee before their trial date.
By consigning all of his stock holdings to the court, Bob has essentially pledged them as security for his release. If he fails to appear in court or violates the conditions of his release, the court may seize his collateral and use it to cover the cost of his bail.
Overall, collateral bail is a common option for defendants who do not have the cash to post bail and need to use other assets as collateral instead.
To know more about trial date visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31553217
#SPJ11
Why you reasoned that it is related to Baum's or UNIDO?
Answer:
United Nations industrial development organization
A space management system is a method for managing
Answer:
A process used to manage time, space, and visibility to reduce the risk of situations.
WHAT CRIMES ARE COMMITTED BY BOTH MEN AND WOMEN (give 5 crimes)
, murder, robbery, assault, kidnapping.
Answer:
1. Embezzlement
2. Domestic Violence
3. Murder
4. Car Theft
5. Extortion
Explanation:
How can one conclude the case of o organisation undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)
To conclude the case of "Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse v Minister of Transport and Others (32097/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1; 2022 (2) SA 566 (GP)," it is necessary to analyze the judgment and its final outcome.
Locate the court's website or online portal by visiting the official website of the Gauteng Division of the High Court or the relevant judiciary website in South Africa. Searching for the case by using the provided case citation to search for the specific case on the court's website or database.
The case number "32097/2020" should help in locating the case. Get to the judgment Once you discover the case, you ought to be able to get to the complete text of the judgment, which can give the conclusion of the case and any important orders or decisions made by the court.
It's imperative to note that the particular conclusion of the case can as it were be decided by checking on the judgment itself, as the conclusion will depend on the realities, contentions, and lawful standards considered by the court.
To learn about Tax Abuse visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28337521
#SPJ4
Complete question: How can one conclude the case of o organization undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)? how can u approach a case?
Dirty headlight lenses are safe and do not cut the amount of light your headlight emit by as much as 90
Answer:
What type of headlight lens can cut the amount of light it emits by 90 percent? Low beam Keep headlights clean Dirt on the lenses can reduce the light by percent?
Explanation:
The plastic lenses that commonly cover headlight bulbs become cloudy and hazy over time, reducing the amount of light illuminating the road.
How does a prosecutor decide whether or not to file charges?
Answer:
la suficienta de probe
Explanation:
HELLO? PLEASE HELP
What purpose of government is shown in the First Amendment?
They help people cooperate
They limit the rights of individuals
They guarantee rights of individuals.
They provide services
Answer: they guarantee the rights of individuals
Explanation:
elow is an example of an articulatory process. identify which one it is (possible answers: assimilation, dissimilation, deletion, epenthesis):greek: [fθinos] -> [ftinos] ‘cheap’
The articulatory process occurring in the Greek example [fθinos] -> [ftinos] 'cheap' is assimilation.
The articulatory process in the given example is assimilation. Assimilation is an articulatory process in which one sound becomes more similar to another sound that is nearby in a word. It is a process in which a sound is influenced by the sounds around it and becomes more similar to them.
In this case, the voiceless dental fricative /θ/ has been assimilated to the voiceless alveolar stop /t/, making both sounds more similar in their place of articulation. Hence, in the given example, the /θ/ sound in the Greek word [fθinos] becomes more like the /t/ sound that follows it, resulting in the pronunciation [ftinos]. This is an example of assimilation because the /θ/ sound has become more like the /t/ sound due to the influence of the following sound.
Learn more about Articulatory:
https://brainly.com/question/31247516
#SPJ11
Does the First Amendment protects the right to bear arms Brainly?
Answer:
Uhhh the second amendment does.
Explanation:
:)
Answer:
the right to bear arms is not specifically protected by the First Amendment, but rather by the Second Amendment to the Constitution.
Explanation:
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the freedom of speech, religion, and the press, as well as the right to peaceably assemble and petition the government for a redress of grievances. It does not explicitly mention the right to bear arms.
However, the Second Amendment to the Constitution does protect the right to bear arms. It states: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
This amendment has been the subject of much debate and legal interpretation over the years. Some argue that it protects an individual's right to own firearms for self-defense and other lawful purposes, while others believe that it only protects the right of states to maintain militias.
In any case, the right to bear arms is not specifically protected by the First Amendment, but rather by the Second Amendment to the Constitution.