[12-04] A joint venture takes place when a company
A. chooses to grant a foreign firm the means to produce and sell its product.
B. launches another company which it partially or completely owns in a foreign country.
C. designates a national firm or an individual of the host country as its legal representative.
D. invests in a country by engaging in business with an entity from that country.
E. invests in two businesses that are related to each other in its home country.
Answers
When a company invests in a nation by conducting business with a national organization, a joint venture is created.
What is it called when a company invests directly in a project or business in another nation?When a business, multinational enterprise, or individual from one nation makes an investment in the assets or acquires stock in the businesses of another nation, this is known as foreign direct investment (FDI).
What are some instances of corruption in foreign nations?Failure to implement internal controls, maintain accurate books and records, carry out enough payment audits, and implement proper anti-bribery compliance rules are a few examples of FCPA accounting infractions.
What are the other two options to FDI?Theoretically, a company would choose between investing and carrying out the production activity in the host country or producing in the domestic economy and exporting to the target country in order to enter a foreign market.
To Know more about national organization,
https://brainly.com/question/17105233
#SPJ1
Related Questions
mardi gras float riders are required by law to wear masks. (True or False)
Answers
Answer: True
Explanation: Masking became a tradition because, during early Carnivals, people put on masks to be able to mingle outside their class and keep their reputation untarnished. Float riders are required to wear masks by law in keeping with the mystery and tradition, and many krewes never reveal who their king or queen is
When a defendant "stands mute" at arraignment, he or she is considered to have
entered a
A) negotiated plea.
B) not guilty plea.
C)
no-contest plea.
D) guilty plea.
Answers
Answer
B not guilty plea
What is the environmental impact assessment act, and its
benefits? (please answer in a detailed non- plagiarized answer
)
Answers
The Environmental Impact Assessment Act evaluates and manages the environmental impacts of proposed projects, promoting sustainable development and environmental protection.
A framework for assessing and managing the potential environmental effects of proposed projects or activities is established by the Environmental Impact Assessment Act. Its main advantages include promoting sustainable development by taking into account social, economic and environmental factors, protecting the environment by identifying and mitigating negative effects and facilitating public participation in decision making processes.
The act promotes project enhancements and modifications, ensures adherence to environmental regulations and provides comprehensive information on environmental impacts to enable informed decision making. The EIA Act promotes more environmentally conscious and sustainable development, ecosystem protection and a balance between development and conservation by incorporating environmental factors into project planning.
Learn more about Environmental Impact Assessment Act. at:
brainly.com/question/33015812
#SPJ4
Which accurately describes a push marketing tactic to help manufacturers sell more products?
O A manufacturer launches a new print advertising campaign in several magazines.
O A manufacturer incorporates social media to increase brand awareness.
O A manufacturer creates a new television advertising campaign.
O A manufacturer offers department stores incentives for selling its product.
Answers
Which of the following is a safe place to pass another vehicle on a two-lane country road?
Answers
Answer:
i dont see any attachment add sum and ill come back
Explanation:
t see any attachment add sum and ill come back
Describe what an officer must demonstrate to justify an emergency search.
Answers
Answer:
Few provisions of the Bill of Rights grew so directly out of the experience of the colonials as the Fourth Amendment, embodying as it did the protection against the use of the “writs of assistance.” But though the insistence on freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures as a fundamental right gained expression in the colonies late and as a result of experience,1 there was also a rich English experience to draw on. “Every man’s house is his castle” was a maxim much celebrated in England, as Saman’s Case demonstrated in 1603.2 A civil case of execution of process, Saman’s Case nonetheless recognized the right of the homeowner to defend his house against unlawful entry even by the King’s agents, but at the same time recognized the authority of the appropriate officers to break and enter upon notice in order to arrest or to execute the King’s process. Most famous of the English cases was Entick v. Carrington,3 one of a series of civil actions against state officers who, pursuant to general warrants, had raided many homes and other places in search of materials connected with John Wilkes’ polemical pamphlets attacking not only governmental policies but the King himself
Explanation:
Broker Audrey has a listing agreement with seller Scarlett. One of Audrey's salespeople commits a license law violation while interacting with Scarlett. Audrey
1 could be responsible due to vicarious liability.
2 cannot be responsible for the actions of others as a broker even if she knew they were breaking the law.
3 will not receive as large of a commission.
4 should void the listing agreement.
Answers
In case of Audrey's salesperson violating license law, Audrey could be held responsible due to vicarious liability, which means option A is correct.
Listing agreement is the legal contract made between the service broker and the property owner which consists of exclusive rights to sell listing. Thus the right of selling the property to a new customer is given to the broker. If any of the employee from the broker's side breaks the law, then they are liable for the compensation and punishment. Vicarious liability is the responsibility one individual has over the actions committed by other. It is caused due to negligence of the top employee and and breach of duty bound care. It can occur due to lack of communication between the broker and the salesperson.
Learn more about listing agreement at:
brainly.com/question/28474097
#SPJ4
Canada Contractual Law
Valerie wants to splurge on her new she-shed (outdoor female equivalent of a man cave) Although her she-shed did have a lovely wine fridge and a crystal chandelier, something was missing. She hired a landscaping company – Major Tom’s Ground Control to provide a boxwood hedge, an angel stone path leading up to the shed, and several exotic plants and trees. A contract was drawn up which spelled out what Major Tom would do in exchange for $10,000.00. Valerie provided Major Tom with a $5,000.00 deposit to begin the work they had agreed upon. One stipulation in the contract, was that Major Tom would remove all leftover plant material and debris and clean the property before they left.
On the afternoon the landscaping was to be completed, she arrived home from work with her friends ready to begin enjoying the she-shed. The she shed looked lovely. Major Tom was nowhere to be found but they had left behind a hill of dirt, several shovels, a pair of work boots and two empty cases of beer. Valerie was not happy. She called Major Tom and told them that she would not pay the balance of $5000.00 because they had failed to clean the property as indicated by the contract after the work was completed.
What are the legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario? Does she have a case?
Based on the material in Chapter 7, provide a clear and detailed rationale as to what can be done to solve the problem in this scenario.
Answers
The legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario are the Breach of Contract and Contractual Remedies. Valerie has a case in this scenario.
What can be done to solve the problem in this scenario is that a demand letter can be sent to Major Tom’s Ground Control company. This letter should indicate that they breached the contract by failing to clean the property after completing the work and that she will not be paying the balance of $5000.00. In addition, Valerie should include that she is willing to pay a fair amount to have another company come in and clean up the property. Finally, she could inform Major Tom’s Ground Control that if they fail to comply with her demands, she will take legal action against them.
It is necessary to note that a demand letter should be sent with registered mail. This ensures that the letter is received by the intended recipient. If the letter is ignored, Valerie may need to file a claim in Small Claims Court. The evidence to support her claim includes the contract, deposit, pictures of the property, the demand letter, and any other correspondence between her and Major Tom's Ground Control.
Learn more about Small Claims Court: https://brainly.com/question/16507110
#SPJ11
After analyzing his business venture, Jim chalked out a business plan, which included maintaining a high liquidity to cover any cash crunch at a future date. He also insured his inventory to cover all losses that could arise due to theft and damage as his goods are transported and stored in warehouses all over the country. How would you classify his plan? Jim’s business policy could be classified as a plan.
Answers
Jim's business plan could be classified as a financial plan, which is part of the strategic business plan.
What is a strategic business plan?A strategic business plan sets the overall goal for the business and marshalls out priorities on how to achieve the plan.
A strategic plan includes the business's vision, goals, and initiatives, describing the customers and their needs and how to deliver a unique value to the customers.
Thus, with Jim's plan concentrating on the financial aspects of the business plan, his plan could be classified as a financial plan.
Learn more about financial planning at https://brainly.com/question/12890843
Is it a violation of the Federal Wiretap Law (Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act) for Gary to allow law enforcement officers to listen to a telephone conversation between himself and Terry without Terry’s knowledge
Answers
Answer:
I think it's a crime and it shows no manners
Do you feel like the number of crimes needs to be divided (normalized) by the population of each census tract? Why or why not? (I want you to think which way is more reliable analysis result to see the relative risk of the crime in each census tract) whether the number of crimes needs to be normalized by the population of each census tract or not. Then, explain why or why no
Answers
Number of crime should be divided by the number of inhabitants in each enumeration lot.
Crime predominantly rely upon the two element for example Crime volume and crime percentage. Wrongdoing volume is essentially various wrongdoing occurred in a given year and crime percentage is relativist number that presents wrongdoing on per ca-pita premise.
In this way, rate is the quantity of violations per 100,000 home of populace. Population characteristics like changes in size and density or the demographic and socioeconomic makeup of the population were the primary focus of research on the impact of the population on crime for decades. Therefore, population density plays a significant role in both the rate and volume of crime.
Learn more about Crime volume:
brainly.com/question/30744181
#SPJ4
According to Justice Stevens in Clinton v. Jones, when does the president not have immunity from civil damages litigation
Answers
According to Justice Stevens in Clinton v. Jones, the president not have immunity from civil damages litigation in federal civil litigation.
The Constitution of USA does not protect the President from federal civil suit involving the actions committed by the president before entering into the office. As such there is no requirement to stay the case related to civil suit until the President leaves office.
The question involved in this case was whether a serving President because of separation of powers reasons is entitled to absolute immunity from civil litigation arising out of events which occurred prior to his taking office?
In an unanimous opinion, the Supreme Court held that the Constitution does not grant the sitting President any immunity from civil litigation except under highly unusual and special circumstances.
To know more about Clinton v Jones refer to-
brainly.com/question/542741#
#SPJ4
_can be used to assess_
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Which method of estimating reliability would you use when the assessment instrument uses scales that have a range, such as strongly agree, agree, neutral,
describe bthe importance of analysis incident of car theft, indicating how such an analysis could aid the prevention of car theft, the combating of car theft , and the investigation of car theft
Answers
Answer:
The important of it is can also help us for everyday transaction and it can help to analyze what will happen at every rolled your wheel.
Which statement about bias in social studies sources is true?
Answers
Answer: D. Bias occurs when a writer intentionally omits information that weakens his or her argument.
Explanation:
Social studies is the study of people and how they relate with one another in society.
In research, bias can occur for a multitude of reasons and one of these reasons is when a writer intentionally omits information that weakens his or her argument.
All the relevant information about a subject should be included so that the research can be scrutinized appropriately. However, sometimes researchers want the research to turn out in a certain way for whatever reason and will omit information that will weaken this result.
This will result in a bias in the research.
What kind of order does the U.S. Supreme Court issue to indicate it will review a case?
A. Writ of certiorari
B. Majority Opinion
C. Summary Judgement
D. Writ of Habeas Corpus
Answers
Answer:
A. Writ of certiorari
Explanation:
writ of certiorari - An order issued by the Supreme Court directing the lower court to transmit records for a case for which it will hear on appeal. The Supreme Court is usually not required to hear appeals of cases.
Answer:
The answer is Writ of certioria
Explanation:
I took the quiz and got it right.
Project: Lulu the Runaway Dog
Project Part A: Lulu the Runaway Dog
Let's review the runaway dog example. When you see Lulu escape, you shout, "Come back, Lulu!" but Lulu the Labrador has already run through one neighbor's yard and is racing down the street. You decide that pursuing her in your fuel-efficient Focus would be the best course of action. However, you can't possibly end your phone conversation. After all, you are discussing the latest Dame Daisy video and analyzing it minute by minute. With your phone in one hand, car keys in the other, you rev up your car and head off to find Lulu. Jamie, Lulu's ten-year-old owner whom you are also babysitting, jumps in the car with you.
As you are driving (a little faster than the speed limit) and talking on your phone, an annoying fly starts to buzz around your head. You shake your head and as you refocus and look ahead, there is Lulu—right in front of your car. You slam on your brakes and turn the wheels of the car sharply to the right with all your might to avoid hitting Lulu. A motorist opposite you drives onto the curb and bangs up the side of his car as he avoids hitting your vehicle. You slam into a utility pole, which was badly in need of repair, and knock it down. The pole hits a tree that smashes into a house and severely damages the front porch.
Luckily, Lulu is fine. So is the motorist, who is very angry. Jamie is complaining that her wrist feels like it is all twisted. You cannot help thinking, "Oh boy, am I in trouble!"
But you are "just a kid," right? Where do you start to sort out this mess?
You start by contacting your cousin, Marjorie, who is a first-year law student at State University. You tell her every little detail you remember, including all events leading up to the accident. She wants to help you determine to whom you may have owed a duty of care and to whom you breached this duty. She sends you an email with the questions listed below. Please answer them.
Marjorie's Questions:
Who was involved in the accident?
Did you owe a duty to anyone? If so, what duty or duties and to which particular individuals?
Which duties did you breach?
Were your actions the cause of any injuries? Were you actions an actual cause or a proximate cause, or both?
For what damages could you be held liable? Are there any defenses against potential plaintiffs? If so, what are they?
Provide a brief four- to five-paragraph answer.
Project Part B: A Fire near Gidgits Galore
Gidgits Galore borders a privately owned ten-acre forest. Pete owns the land. It is zoned "mixed," so businesses and residences can be found throughout the neighborhood. Through the forest is a multiresidence apartment building. Danny, a high-school senior who lives in one of the apartments, has crammed all night for his economics final and needs a break. He has decided to take a morning walk down one of the forest's paths, prodding the piles of leaves and clumps of moss with his walking stick. He sees what appeared to be a recently-used campfire, and pokes around it with his stick. As he wanders farther, he doesn't realize that he has reignited the fire.
To make matters worse, it is unexpectedly windy that day. As the wind picks up, the flames leap over 200 feet to a storage shed used by the apartment building's maintenance workers. One of them, Don, has just arrived to get his lawnmower. He calls 911. While waiting, he tries to extinguish the flames with his jacket, but he stops when his work shirt catches fire.
The flames also reach the tent of Cassie, the camper who lit the campfire the previous night. Cassie thought she had extinguished the fire as she set up her tent nearby. Cassie wakes up coughing from smoke inhalation and manages to exit the tent before it is destroyed by fire. One of Gidgits Galore's managers, Dianne, arrives to open up the store but is detoured by the smoke she sees in the distance. Soon she too is overwhelmed by its acrid smell, which brings on a severe asthma attack. As quickly as the flames started, the wind stops, and they die down. Firefighters who arrive on the scene are able to quickly extinguish the fire.
You are a member of a mock jury in a negligence case. As a juror, one of your duties is to find the facts from the evidence presented and determine if there is enough evidence to show that the defendant was negligent. Sort out the facts in the present case.
Prepare a brief argument (three to four paragraphs) outlining why Danny could be held negligent against the potential plaintiffs listed below.
Don the maintenance worker
Cassie the camper
Dianne the GidgitsGalore employee
Pete the landowner
Prepare a brief argument (two to three paragraphs) showing why Danny's conduct did not amount to negligence against any of the potential plaintiffs listed above.
Answers
took me 20 mintues but here
At that time little Lulu was wearing only a sweater, a ruffled skirt, and tights. After the serious punishment Lulu began to do things as her mother ordered. Chua was determined to raise an obedient Chinese child—in the West, obedience is associated with dogs and the caste system, but in Chinese culture, it is considered among the highest of virtues.
“But run where when there are 30,000 teenagers who have fled their homes in New York and only 400 emergency shelter beds, 13,000 runaways in New Jersey with a safe haven for only 300, and 10,000 in Connecticut with room for just 115? Even if a runaway finds a bed in a crisis center, where does he or she go after reaching the 30 days federal limit for sanctuary in an emergency shelter?” (Gross, 1) It is a sad thing that these are ordinary numbers, that these numbers for runaway children are realistic at all. There are not enough youth shelters, for kids to be able to flee to a haven when their home isn’t safe.
And also the fact that Curley’s wife does not have a name, but is only referred to as “Curley’s wife” and that Slim’s dog is given a name – “Lulu” – shows the reader that dogs were treated better than women at those times. The failure of Curley’s wife’s dream leads to her death, which also takes place in late afternoon, as the days ends so does her life. John Steinbeck tells us through this cyclical novel that dreams are futile.
Runaway Kids When children and teens have to deal with abuse, family, depression, or any other issues for an extensive period of time without getting the help they may run away. When a kid has these problems and they are unable to get help then why would they stick around and wait for dad to come home? The process in which our government finds and helps runaway children is not up to a standard that keeps them from falling into the streets and succumbing to sex, drugs, and violence.
Candy wants people to treat him once he is canned like this. This is because he “won’t have no place to go, an’ he can’t get no more jobs”. The other ranch hands say that he can replace the dog with one of Lulu’s pups, but of course that wouldn’t be the same, never is anyone or anything the equivalent, everyone and everything is unique.
Candy wants people to treat him once he is canned like this. This is because he “won’t have no place to go, an’ he can’t get no more jobs”. The other ranch hands say that he can replace the dog with one of Lulu’s pups, but of course that wouldn’t be the same, never is anyone or anything the equivalent, everyone and everything is unique.
1. What economic questions does this case require the townb to ask? What is a dog park and how does it benefit the community? Can people or dogs get hurt at a dog park? How will dogs fight be avoided? If a dog park is built, will there be space available for an affordable recreation facility? 2. List the possible resources that the town would need to construct and maintain the park?
This action evinces that Candy is apologising to the dog on Carlson’s behalf. Candy treats his dog like a human as his dog is his only companion. However, the workers at the ranch see him only as a dog. When Carlson mentions to Candy about shooting his dog, Candy’s actions and dialogues convey how Candy feels about this idea.
Dogs like to be free, and they like to run and play instead of being chained down. Secondly, it provides dog owners with a chance to do things with their pets that they can’t do because of limited space. Lastly, having a dog park will prove that the town is family friendly, attracting more families to the town, and for all of the reasons, a dog park should be constructed in the town of Martinsville.
Teens may turn to drugs and or drink at sometimes a very young age to cope with the hardships they face at home, school, or with personal issues. Whether they turn to them before running away and being exposed to the streets or beforehand, there is a high likelihood of it. The law about runaways differs from that of abductees.
[Original source: https://essaytoolbox.com/essay-maker]
Answer:
1. First Everybody involved is Lulu for running away. Jamie for being in the car with you. The motorist who almost got hit and messed up his bike. And the home owner who needs to repair his house. And of course the protagonist (we'll call dave).
Dave's duties were to watch Jamie. On top of that he should have been taking care of Lulu. He let Lulu escape and almost hit her, voiding this duty. He also put Jamie in danger when he was driving recklessly.
Lulu was in his care so we can assume her escaping is actual cause. Another actual cause is him letting Jamie get hurt. How ever The utility pole hitting the house can be equated to proximate cause. Same goes for the motorist messing up his car.
Jamie can be liable to basically anyone here. He hit the pole which went into the house. His reckless driving ran a dude off the road. And now Jamie's hand is likely twisted because of him. He is fully liable.
2. Danny is liable to everyone here by proximate cause . Pete's land is the land he burned. It doesn't matter that he didn't realize the consequences he still was messing with some he had not business messing with.
That campfire was near enough to Cassie's tent that she actually inhaled much smoke. This could have gave her lung damage. Many people die from smoke inhalation a year and she could have been one of them. Not only that but she was near enough to the fire that it actually consumed her tent eventually. The smoke from a fire could have actually lured her into a deeper sleep. This means that either the smoke or the fire would have killed her.
Then we have Don who was actually there when the she caught flames, to pick up his lawnmower. This puts him directly into danger. Not only that but his stuff is now burned. He most likely suffer burns considering that his shirt caught fire.
Dianne came the closest to death. She was just trying to work her when the smoke catches up to her. This causes her to have terrible asthma. Considering this that mean that her lungs may be damaged. She came the closest to death because of his recklessness.
Danny is not liable to anyone here. Pete is the one you could easiest argue he is liable to, but Cassie is liable. Cassie should have made sure that the fire was actually all the way down before she went to bed. If all he did was poke it and it reignited, that should say that it was nowhere near out. This means by proximate cause she is just as liable as him
Then we have Don. Although he may have been around when it caught fire he had an obvious window of opportunity to leave. Instead he put property over health. That was his choice. He knew the possible consequences, unlike my client who just thought that it was safe. Any damages done to himself was not a cause of Dan.
Dianne who most likely suffered the most isn't innocent either. She saw the flames and decided to stay at her job. For her own safety she should have left but she didn't. This mean that the cause here isn't Danny.
PLEASE HELP I WILL GIVE YOU 70 points PLEASE HELP ME PLEASE PLEASE
Answers
Constitution of United States of America 1789
Explanation:
You posted a photo of the 1st amendment, but didn't ask what you were looking for so I am just assuming this is what you need
jerry owns a parcel of land. nate, one of jerry's closest friends and an attorney, persuaded jerry to sell the land to nate at a price substantially below fair market value. at the time jerry sold the land, he was resting in a nursing home recovering from a serious illness. if jerry desires to set aside the sale, which of the following causes of action is most likely to be successful?a.misrepresentationb.fraudc.duressd.undue influence
Answers
Jerry is most likely to be successful in setting aside the sale by claiming undue influence. (D)
Undue influence occurs when one party takes advantage of their power or influence over another party, causing the weaker party to enter into an agreement that they otherwise wouldn't have.
In this case, Nate, being Jerry's close friend and an attorney, had influence over Jerry, who was in a vulnerable state due to his serious illness and stay in a nursing home. Nate persuaded Jerry to sell the land at a price significantly below fair market value.
To successfully claim undue influence, Jerry should demonstrate the existence of a close relationship with Nate, his vulnerability at the time, and how Nate exploited the situation for his benefit. If Jerry can prove these elements, the court may set aside the sale and restore the parties to their original positions.(D)
To know more about fair market value click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/30404131#
#SPJ11
Paul, a law enforcement officer, arrests Barney for creating a disturbance at a subway station. While Barney is handcuffed face down on the ground, Paul shoots and kills him. Paul claims that he accidentally grabbed his gun instead of his Taser. Is this an issue of criminal law or criminal procedure?
Answers
The issue of Paul, a law enforcement officer, shooting and killing Barney while he was handcuffed face down on the ground is an issue of criminal law.Criminal law is the body of law that deals with crimes, offenses, and their punishments.
It involves the interpretation and enforcement of laws that define crimes and the punishment of those who commit them.The fact that Paul shot and killed Barney is considered a crime because it is an unlawful act that violates the criminal law.
The punishment for the crime is determined by criminal law, which in this case could be a sentence of more than 100 years in prison.In conclusion, the issue of Paul shooting and killing Barney is an issue of criminal law because it involves the interpretation and enforcement of laws that define crimes and their punishments. The fact that Barney was handcuffed and on the ground when he was shot does not change the nature of the offense.
To know more about enforcement visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29422434
#SPJ11
which of the following situations would not substantiate proper standing to sue
Answers
Answer:
The answer is B
Explanation:
what is the main characteristic pf a rubuttable presumption?
Answers
Answer:
A rebuttable presumption is assumed true until a person proves otherwise (for example the presumption of innocence). In contrast, a conclusive (or irrebuttable) presumption cannot be refuted in any case (such as defense of infancy in some legal systems).Explanation:
Rebuttable presumption: Both in common law and in civil law, a rebuttable presumption is an assumption made by a court that is taken to be true unless someone comes forward to contest it and prove otherwise.
For Example
a defendant in a criminal case is presumed innocent until proved guilty.
Mr. Asif, a Salaried Individual, has following information for the Tax Year 2020.
• His Annual Tax Certificate from Employer shows, Annual Gross Salaried Income of Rs. 950,000
• His employer has deducted WHT under Section 149 (Salary of Employee) Rs. 17200. • His Mobile Tax Certificate shows WHT under Section 236 (Prepaid Telephone Card) Rs. 889.
• He received share of Profit from Investment in a Business Rs. 150,000.
• The details of his Personal Assets as follow:
Balances June 30, 2019 June 30, 2020
Cash at Hand 50,000 50,000
Bank Account (Salaried) 121,000 159,000
Bank Account (Saving) 150,000 265,000
Prize Bond 255,000 255,000
Investment in Business 2,000,000 2,000,000
Property (Residential) 3,200,000 3,200,000
Calculate:
• Total Income
• Tax Chargeable (Annual Income Tax)
• Admitted Income Tax (Remaining Tax Liability)
• His estimated Personal Expenses (Reconciliation of Personal Assets)
Answers
1. Total Income is Rs. 1,100,000.
2. Tax chargeable is, Rs. 21,787.65.
3. Mr. Asif's remaining tax liability, Admitted Income Tax, is Rs. 3,698.65.
4. Mr. Asif's estimated personal expenses for the tax year 2020 are Rs. 797,000.
Total Income:
Annual Gross Salaried Income = Rs. 950,000
Share of Profit from Investment = Rs. 150,000
Total Income = Rs. 950,000 + Rs. 150,000 = Rs. 1,100,000
Tax Chargeable (Annual Income Tax):
Taxable Income = Total Income - WHT under Section 149 - WHT under Section 236 = Rs. 1,100,000 - Rs. 17,200 - Rs. 889 = Rs. 1,081,911
Taxable income falls under the tax slab of Rs. 1,000,001 to Rs. 2,500,000, so the tax rate would be 15%.
Income Tax = Taxable Income x Tax Rate - Fixed Tax Amount
Income Tax = (Rs. 1,081,911 x 0.15) - Rs. 72,250
Income Tax = Rs. 21,787.65
Admitted Income Tax (Remaining Tax Liability):
Admitted Income Tax is the tax liability that remains after deducting the taxes already paid, including WHT and Advance Tax.
Total Taxes Paid = WHT under Section 149 + WHT under Section 236 = Rs. 17,200 + Rs. 889 = Rs. 18,089
Admitted Income Tax = Income Tax - Total Taxes Paid = Rs. 21,787.65 - Rs. 18,089 = Rs. 3,698.65
To estimate Mr. Asif's personal expenses, we need to reconcile his personal assets from June 30, 2019, to June 30, 2020. The increase in personal assets during this period represents his savings, and the decrease represents his expenses.
Cash at Hand: No change, so no expenses
Bank Account (Salaried): Increased by Rs. 38,000 (159,000 - 121,000), representing savings
Bank Account (Saving): Increased by Rs. 115,000 (265,000 - 150,000), representing saving.
Total Savings: Rs. 153,000 (38,000 + 115,000)
To estimate Mr. Asif's personal expenses,
Personal Expenses = Gross Salary - Total Savings
Gross Salary = Rs. 950,000
Total Savings = Rs. 153,000
Personal Expenses = 950,000 - 153,000 = Rs. 797,000
To know more about annual income, here
brainly.com/question/30444076
#SPJ4
In its most recent review from the ASC, California BREA received a rating of:
1) Excellent
2) Good
3) Needs improvement
4) Not satisfactory
Answers
The Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers (BREA) is a department of the Department of Consumer Affairs of the state of California. The California BREA received an “Excellent” rating from the ASC in its most recent review. So, the correct option is 1) Excellent.
The Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers (BREA) is a government organization responsible for the licensing and regulation of real estate appraisers in California. BREA is a sub-agency of the California Department of Consumer Affairs, which is responsible for protecting the public by licensing and regulating professionals in various industries. The department's principal mission is to ensure that Californians receive the highest possible standards of service and protection in the real estate appraisal industry.
ASC stands for the Appraisal Subcommittee, which is a government agency that oversees state licensing and certification programs for real estate appraisers. ASC was formed in response to the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA), which called for the establishment of national standards for real estate appraisers.
To know more about ASC visit: brainly.com/question/28963263
#SPJ11
The main responsibility of the lieutenant governor is to __________. A. audit the state budget B. check the power of the governor C. serve as the leader of the state senate D. monitor the state and highway police force Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D
Answers
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Select the correct answer.
What type of glass is heat resistant?
O A. leaded glass
OB.
tinted glass
O c. borosilicate glass
OD. tempered glass
Answers
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
Because "boro" is known for having low coefficients of thermal expansion.
Please help no has answered this is my 3rd re:ask question I wasted 50 points please someone help
Scenario: A 16 year old student has a party at his house. The student has good grades, a clear driving record and never been in trouble. The student has 7 friends over and everyone is drinking underage. They all leave to go to the store. The student who drove had 6 people inside the truck and 2 in the bed of the truck. The teen is under the influence of alcohol and hits a vehicle that is disabled on the side of the road. The driver loses control and runs over four people standing on the side of the road and kills them all. The truck flips over and injuries everyone that was in the truck.
Pretend you are a judge handling the case. The teen is found guilty of DUI, 4 counts of vehicular manslaughter, and 8 counts DUI accident causing injury. What should the punishment be for the teen? Justify your answer! Your answer must be no less than 4 sentences.
Answers
Answer:
Hey, That is a really Good question. AS, a Proscutor, I would argue that the Minor driving and the Minors in the truck knew what they were doing. AS a judge I wouldn't hold back I would give them the Max in Jail depending on there age they will spend some years in Juvinile Jail until they turn 18. Once they turn 18 they will go to the Jail with the rest of the adults. Once they are moved to the other jail they will once again have another court date for the Judge to then decide if he/or she will allow them to have parol or make them finish their Sentance out. Most likely the Judge will give them 3 months for each DUI and 10 years for Each Manslaughter charge.
Explanation:
I hope this helps.
Chris is the owner of a fast food stall. Dan bought some food from Chris' stall. Dan became
seriously ill soon after he ate the food. He spent two weeks in hospital. It was discovered
that the food from the stall was contaminated.
Doctors found that Dan was very likely to suffer more than most people from food poisoning.
Dan eventually recovered from his illness, but found that he had lost £20 000 earnings from
his work. He also lost out on an expected promotion at work as he failed to attend an
interview when he was in hospital.
Dan had given some of his food to Euan, a homeless person, who also became ill for a short time.
Advise Dan as to his rights and remedies against Chris. Advise Euan as to his rights and remedies
against Dan or Chris 20 marks
Answers
it would be against chris because he cooked the food (is the owner aswell) because dan did't know that the food was contaminated.
Explanation:
What does the 15th Amendment mean in simple terms?
Answers
In simple terms, the 15th Amendment means that the government cannot deny a person the right to vote based on their race or colour.
The 15th Amendment is one of the important amendments to the United States Constitution. It gives African American men the right to vote and is an important part of the Civil Rights Movement in the late 19th century.
The amendment was passed in 1870 and was the third amendment to be added to the Constitution after the Civil War. The first amendment was the 13th Amendment, which abolished slavery, and the second was the 14th Amendment, which granted equal protection under the law to all citizens. The 15th Amendment was added to ensure that African American men had the same rights as white men when it came to voting.
Before the 15th Amendment, many states had laws that prevented African Americans from voting, such as poll taxes and literacy tests. These laws were designed to keep African Americans from participating in the political process and having a say in the government. The 15th Amendment made it illegal for states to use race as a reason to deny a person the right to vote.
To learn more about 15th Amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/620540#
#SPJ11
Martha lost a case at the U.S. Court of Appeals level. In response she petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to hear her case. The U.S. Supreme court denied her request to issue a writ of certiorari. This means:
a. the U.S. Supreme Court believed her claim did not have merit.
b. the U.S. Supreme Court agreed with the lower court’s decision.
c. only four of the U.S. Supreme Court justices agreed to hear the case.
d. the lower court’s decision remains the law in that jurisdiction.
e. a and d.
Answers
This means the U.S. Supreme Court believed her claim did not have merit and the lower court’s decision remains the law in that jurisdiction. The correct option is e.
The United States Supreme Court rejected Martha's request for a writ of certiorari because it thought her claim lacked merit. The Supreme Court effectively upholds the judgment rendered by the U.S. Court of Appeals by declining to hear her case. This indicates that the decision of the lower court is still binding in that region.
There are no more legal avenues Martha can pursue to appeal the lower court's ruling to the Supreme Court. The denial of certiorari indicates that the Supreme Court did not find the case compelling enough to merit their review rather than necessarily implying agreement with the lower court's ruling. As a result, the verdict rendered by the lower court in Martha's case stands as the final ruling.
Learn more about writ of certiorari at:
brainly.com/question/11741023
#SPJ4