Yes, Sam is liable to Nathan for the additional injury caused due to his negligent driving.
Sam had a duty of care towards Nathan when he offered to take him to the hospital. However, Sam breached this duty of care by looking for his phone while driving, which is an act of negligence. This negligence caused a car accident and additional injury to Nathan.
As a result, Sam is responsible for the harm caused to Nathan due to his careless actions. Therefore, Sam is liable to Nathan for the additional injury caused in the accident.
For more questions like Injury click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/14603010
#SPJ11
Are two cases every really identical? Let's take a look at the cases below.
Jonathan H is arrested and convicted of robbing a gas station attendant at gunpoint. He takes lottery tickets and $400 in cash.
Debra J. is arrested and convicted of robbing an Uber driver at gunpoint. She takes $450 in cash.
Debra is sentenced to 3 years of formal probation and she has to do 100 hours of community service and pay restitution to the Uber driver.
Jonathan is sentenced to 3 years in state prison.
Do you think the sentence differences are fair? If not, explain why. (5 points)
List at least four reasons why the sentences might be different. For each of your reasons, tell us why that reason should make a difference in the punishment. (20 points)
2001 terrorist attack ? 1. Why it was considered terror 2. The motives (reason) of the responsible group and the individual involved (who did it ). Date and nature of the attack
What group was behind the attack, or inspired the attack
A detailed description of the political, social or religious objectives that motivates the group
A detailed description of the group's leader and individuals that carried out the attack
Description as to how the attack unfolded
Answer:
Explanation:
The 2001 terrorist attack refers to the coordinated series of attacks carried out by the terrorist group al-Qaeda on September 11, 2001. The attacks involved four hijacked planes, two of which were flown into the World Trade Center towers in New York City, one into the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, and one crashed in a field in Pennsylvania after passengers attempted to retake control of the plane from the hijackers.
The attacks were considered terror because they were intended to cause mass destruction and fear among the population, with the aim of advancing the political and religious objectives of the group responsible.
The motives of the responsible group, al-Qaeda, were to strike a blow against the United States, whom they saw as an enemy of Islam, and to advance their ultimate goal of establishing a global caliphate under Sharia law.
The group's leader was Osama bin Laden, a Saudi Arabian extremist who had previously fought against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan during the 1980s. Bin Laden founded al-Qaeda in the late 1980s with the aim of waging a global jihad against non-Muslim powers, particularly the United States.
The individuals who carried out the attacks were primarily Saudi Arabian citizens who had been trained and indoctrinated by al-Qaeda. The hijackers were led by Mohamed Atta, an Egyptian national who had become radicalized while studying in Germany.
The attack was carried out in a coordinated manner, with the hijackers taking control of the planes using box cutters and other weapons, and then steering them towards their intended targets. The attack on the World Trade Center towers involved the use of passenger planes as missiles, causing both towers to collapse and resulting in the deaths of nearly 3,000 people. The attack on the Pentagon resulted in significant damage to the building, and the crash in Pennsylvania prevented the hijackers from reaching their intended target, believed to be either the White House or the U.S. Capitol building.
Carlos agrees to transport a valuable painting from London to Liverpool for Danesh, for a fee of £500. The painting is required urgently, for an upcoming exhibition. The day before the painting is to be transported, the only airline flying from London has a problem with its jets, and all flights will be grounded for a week. This is the first time such a serious problem has ever happened with this airline. The only alternative for Carlos is to pay for a private chartered flight for the painting, or transport it by road. Both of these options will cost more than £1000. Danesh claims that the extra costs are Carlos’ problem, and that he will sue Carlos for breach of contract if the painting is not delivered on time. Carlos says that the contract has now been frustrated, and a new contract must be negotiated. Who is right?
Carlos is right as the contract was frustrated, not by Carlos or Danesh, but by the failure of the Airline to fly.
What is contract frustration?Contract frustration refers to the breach of contract for non-performance without the fault of either party to the contract.
This implies that the obliging party cannot perform and fulfill the contractual obligations because of the occurrence of a fundamental event, making it impracticable or impossible.
Thus, Carlos is right as the contract was frustrated, not by Carlos or Danesh, but by the failure of the Airline to fly, thereby necessitating the formation of a new contract.
Learn more about the frustration of contracts at https://brainly.com/question/27415360
#SPJ1
Which of the following is not a reason that an individual can be given the death penalty in Texas?
The death penalty in Texas is only applicable for certain crimes, including intentional killing of another person. Crimes such as theft or drug possession do not qualify for the death penalty.
The death penalty is a legal punishment in the state of Texas, where individuals convicted of certain crimes may be sentenced to death.
However, there are limitations to the circumstances under which the death penalty can be imposed.
According to Texas law, individuals cannot be given the death penalty for crimes that do not involve the intentional killing of another person.
Therefore, one reason that an individual cannot be given the death penalty in Texas is if they have been convicted of a non-capital offense, such as theft or drug possession.
However, if an individual has been found guilty of a capital offense such as murder, kidnapping, or treason, they may be eligible for the death penalty in Texas.
It is important to note that the use of the death penalty is controversial and subject to debate, with some arguing that it is a necessary form of punishment for heinous crimes, while others argue that it is a cruel and inhumane practice that should be abolished.
In summary, an individual cannot be given the death penalty in Texas for crimes that do not involve the intentional killing of another person.
For more such questions on death penalty
https://brainly.com/question/29452997
#SPJ11
in creating a criminal profile, investigators look for the , which reveals the personality of the killer, and the , which reveals how the killer committed the crime.
In creating a criminal profile, investigators look for the , which reveals the personality of the killer, and the , which reveals how the killer committed the crime by learning about the identity of the culprits.
A criminal profile is a compilation of assumptions made about the characteristics of the perpetrator of a crime or series of crimes. The criminal-profiling community and the literature it inspires suffer greatly from a lack of accuracy and applied understanding with regard to exactly what an inference is and how to make one without getting lost in fallacy. There is no shortage of inferences based on a variety of methods.
Four main approaches—geographic, clinical profiling, investigative psychology, and typological—are the foundation of criminal profiling techniques. The sixth stage, or the objective of apprehending the offender, is reached after a sequence of five overlapping stages: the criminal profile, the crime assessment, the decision-process models, the investigation, and the apprehension.
Know more about "criminal profile" visit
brainly.com/question/30824129
#SPJ4
Order the steps in a lawsuit chronologically
= Voir dire
= The defendant's case
= The discovery process begins
= Jury instructions
= Service of process on the defendant
= The settlement conference
= File the complaint
= The plaintiff's case
= Judgment
= Closing arguments
Answer:
The Trial Process
This webpage presents an overview of the formal processes and proceedings in any civil trial and a link to separate webpage that presents the specific chronology of events in the Woburn Toxic Trial. Links are also available to videoclips of Ohio State University students performing these tasks in a mock trial.
There are four main stages to a trial. In sequence, they are:
Pleading Stage - filing the complaint and the defense's motions.
Pretrial Stage - discovery process, finding of facts.
Trial Stage - seating of the jury, testimony on behalf of the plaintiffs and testimony on behalf of the defendants.
Post Trial - concluding arguments, judge's charge to the jury, jury deliberations, announcement of judgment, motions for new trial or appeal.
Pleading Stage
Filing a Complaint - In civil proceedings the complaint is the official engagement of the plaintiff with the defense regarding the proposed "injustice" caused by the defense. This is a formal document submitted by the plaintiff to the court having jurisdiction over the complaint.
Summons - Notification by the court in which the complaint is filed as an action being brought against the defense. Service of the summons typically requires a response from the defense within a 30-day period. No response from the defense can trigger a default judgment for the plaintiff.
Motions to Dismiss - These are the defense's response or answers to the plaintiffs complaint. The responses are typically filed as motions and are intended to dismiss the claims expressed in the complaint.
Motion for Judgment - Following the defendants response to the plaintiffs claims, the parties can either choose to settle or request a judgment based on the evidence presented, or the court can decide to continue toward resolving conflict at trial. If there is no judgment made, the case proceeds to the pre-trial stage.
Pretrial Stage
Discovery or Finding of Facts - There are generally two aspects of discovery. One consists of a series of questions, known as interrogatory questions, which are posed by the plaintiff's attorney to the defendant's attorney. The other consists of recording a witnesses sworn testimony, known as a deposition. Depositions typically take place outside the courtroom, before a court recorder, with opposing counsel asking questions of the witness.
Motion for Summary Judgment - At the conclusion of discovery, the court will typically review the facts of the case and determine if there is sufficient merit to proceed to trial or to encourage the parties to settle. If the finding of facts determines the case to be frivolous or non-substantiated, the case is dismissed.
Pretrial Order - If a substantial basis for the case is determined, the court will meet with and notify the parties of the trial schedule.
The Trial
Jury Selection - From a pool of potential jurors, individuals are questioned in a process known as voire dire to determine suitability to serve as impartial juror in the specific case. The judge and counsel for both parties are involved in voire dire process, with each party trying to impanel individuals who may be sympathetic to their cause.
Opening Statements - Statements to the jury made first by the plaintiffs' attorney and then by the defense attorneys setting up the circumstances and rationale of the legal complaint (plaintiffs) and the reasons for dismissing the claim (defense).
Click here to see a videoclip of opening statements from one of the Ohio State mock trials.
Plaintiff Testimony - The first part of the actual trial proceeding consists of the plaintiffs presenting their witnesses and experts to present the arguments and justifications for the complaint. The defense is permitted to cross-examine each witness in an attempt to dismiss, discredit, or disprove the witnesses statements.
Click here to see a videoclip of direct testimony from one of the Ohio State mock trials.
Defense Testimony - After the plaintiffs' case is presented, the defendants present their case in much the same way using witnesses and experts that present direct testimony, followed by cross examination by the plaintiffs' counsel.
Click here to see a videoclip of cross examination from one of the Ohio State mock trials.
Redirection and Recall - At the discretion of the judge, each witness can be redirected after cross examination by either the counsel. If critical information is not divulged during the initial testimony, counsel can request to recall a witness to the stand for additional questioning and cross examination.
Closing Arguments - Counsel for the plaintiffs and defense summarize their clients positions to remind the jurors of the facts presented in their case and to convince the jurors of veracity of their cause. Closing arguments are typically intended to be dramatic and pointed for effect.
Click here to see a videoclip of direct testimony from one of the Ohio State mock trials.
Explanation:
Identify the three major shifts in victimization patterns that have been identified since crime statistics were first gathered. Explain the causes of each. What is expected to occur in the near future and why?
The three major shifts in victimization patterns since crime statistics were first gathered include the rise in cybercrime, the increase in intimate partner violence, and the recognition and reporting of sexual assault. These shifts have been influenced by factors such as technological advancements, changing societal norms, and improved awareness and reporting mechanisms. In the near future, it is expected that there will be increased focus on addressing cybercrime, continued efforts to prevent and respond to intimate partner violence, and ongoing efforts to support and empower survivors of sexual assault.
The rise in cybercrime is driven by the widespread use of technology and the internet, providing new opportunities for criminals to engage in activities such as hacking, identity theft, and online scams. Technological advancements and increased connectivity have created a larger digital landscape for criminals to exploit. Additionally, the anonymity offered by online platforms contributes to the growth of cybercrime.
The increase in intimate partner violence can be attributed to various factors, including changing gender dynamics, economic stress, substance abuse, and power imbalances within relationships. Social shifts and a greater recognition of domestic violence have led to increased reporting and efforts to address this issue. However, it remains a significant challenge to prevent and support survivors of intimate partner violence.
The recognition and reporting of sexual assault have improved over time due to advocacy efforts, changes in societal attitudes, and enhanced support systems for survivors. The #MeToo movement and other initiatives have shed light on the prevalence of sexual assault and harassment, leading to increased awareness and encouraging survivors to come forward. Continued efforts are needed to ensure survivors receive appropriate support and to address systemic issues that contribute to sexual assault.
In the near future, addressing cybercrime will be crucial as technology continues to advance and criminals become more sophisticated. Efforts to prevent and respond to intimate partner violence will persist, with a focus on prevention, education, and supporting survivors. The recognition and support for survivors of sexual assault will continue to grow, with a focus on prevention, accountability, and creating safe environments. Overall, addressing these shifts requires a multi-faceted approach involving education, legislation, social change, and support services to create safer communities and support those affected by victimization.
You can learn more about cybercrime at
https://brainly.com/question/13109173
#SPJ11
An individual’s BAC depends on a persons
An individual’s BAC depends on a persons number of drinks. the he more you drink, the higher the BAC.
Effects of various blood alcohol concentrations on the body:
Blood alcohol levels depend on a variety of variables, including the quantity of drinks consumed, body weight, gender (females have greater blood alcohol levels than males when they consume the same amount of alcohol), and number of drinks. Furthermore, drinking alcohol with meals and sipping it as opposed to consuming it quickly lowers the peak blood alcohol level.
Food not only lowers blood alcohol levels but also encourages the liver to eliminate them. Alcohol dehydrogenase converts alcohol first into acetaldehyde, which is then converted into acetate by aldehyde dehydrogenase.
Learn more about BAC , here;
https://brainly.com/question/32115406
#SPJ6
The claim (in law) that a current case is sufficiently similar to a previous case that it should be settled in the same way
The claim you are referring to is known as the legal concept of "precedent" or "stare decisis."
What is the precedent claim?Precedent is the principle that courts should follow the rulings of prior cases that are similar in legal issues and facts. It means that a court should apply the same legal principles and outcomes to similar cases in order to maintain consistency and predictability in the legal system.
When a party argues that a current case is sufficiently similar to a previous case and should be settled in the same way, they are relying on the principle of precedent.
Read mroe on precedent claim here https://brainly.com/question/2748145
#SPJ1
Barangay 542 was devasted by a violentfire because of the narrow path firefighters have the hard time penetrating the source of firew. The barangay officials then conducted a donation drive for the victims of fire. How did the function of social worker apply in this scenario?
A social worker is a qualified professional who works with a variety of weak individuals, communities, and groups to teach them how to live better lives. People who may be suffering from poverty, prejudice, or other social injustices are often the focus of social workers' efforts.
The goal of the profession of social work is to assist communities and vulnerable individuals in overcoming difficulties they encounter on a daily basis.
Social workers frequently identify as artists, making them original and creative thinkers who thrive in environments that encourage self-expression. They also tend to be social, which means they do best when they can talk to, influence, or assist other people.
Learn more about Social Worker here:
https://brainly.com/question/32260621
#SPJ1
how a citizen's responsibilities can protect others against human rights violations
What is the minimum blood content of a controlled substance that is considered proof of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated in indiana?
Answer:
I believe it is 0.08
Explanation:
should the police be given the full power to control itscitizens? Why or why not?
Answer:
No, they should not. Police don't always know what is right and they can make mistakes. They should stick to protecting their citizens and not controlling. They should leave that to the government.
If maybe police had to be given full power to control its citizens they would need a lot more practices, and they would need more training. Their job would be much harder.
But altogether I don't think they should.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
Greg approaches a local dealer to buy a new car which costs $10,000. He wishes to seek finance to buy the car. The auto dealer asks for a co-signer as surety to sell the car on credit. Greg approaches his friend Claire to co-sign on the agreement. Claire agrees and becomes a surety for Greg's car. Which of the following is true in this case?
a.
Claire is secondarily liable for the payment.
b.
Claire is primarily liable for the payment.
c.
Claire is liable only if the auto dealer has exhausted all other remedies.
d.
Claire is not liable for the payment
The correct statement in the given case is Claire is secondarily liable for the payment. Option a is correct.
In this case, Claire acts as a co-signer or surety for Greg's car purchase. By agreeing to be a co-signer, Claire assumes the responsibility of ensuring the payment if Greg fails to fulfill his obligations.
However, Greg is primarily responsible for making the payments on the car loan. If Greg defaults on the payments, the auto dealer can first attempt to collect from Greg. If Greg is unable to make the payments, then Claire, as the co-signer, becomes secondarily liable and may be pursued for payment.
Therefore, a is correct.
Learn more about payment https://brainly.com/question/32320091
#SPJ11
Regarding documentation, which of the following actions can help a licensee
avoid being accused of unauthorized practice of law?
a. Disclosing in writing to all parties in a transaction that the licensee isn't a licensed
attorney, so there's no licensee liability
b. Having a designated broker review and notarize all completed contracts
c. Having a designated broker write all contracts from scratch to make them specific to each transaction
d. Using approved fill-in-the-blank forms
Answer:
To avoid being accused of unauthorized practice of law, it is essential for a licensee to a. Disclose in writing to all parties in a transaction that the licensee is not a licensed attorney. This can help to make it clear that the licensee is not offering legal advice or representation and that parties should seek the advice of a licensed attorney for legal matters.d. Use approved fill-in-the-blank forms. These forms are often created by attorneys and are specifically designed for use by non-lawyers, such as real estate agents or brokers. Using these forms, the licensee can ensure that they are not accidentally practicing law or offering legal advice. It is generally not advisable for a licensee to:b. Have a designated broker review and notarize all completed contracts. While it may be helpful to have contracts reviewed by a broker or other knowledgeable party, this does not necessarily protect against accusations of unauthorized practice of law. c. Have a designated broker write all contracts from scratch to make them specific to each transaction. This could potentially be considered the unauthorized practice of law, as it involves drafting legal documents. It is generally best for a licensee to rely on approved forms and refer parties to a licensed attorney to create customized legal documents.
Explanation:
The mayor in lan's city complains to him that the number of new recruits to the police department seems to be dwindling. He wants to know why fewer people are willing to consider working in law enforcement. What part of the
Uniform Crime Report might contain useful data for Ilan to share with the mayor?
O
NIBRS
O
Summary Report System
Hate Crime Studies
LEOKA
Answer:
LEOKA
Explanation:
Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted (LEOKA) Program. Through the Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted (LEOKA) Data Collection, the FBI provides data and training that helps keep law enforcement officers safe as they protect the nation's communities.
LEOKA is the part of the Uniform Crime Report might contain useful data for Ilan to share with the mayor. Hence, option D is correct.
What is the purpose of the Uniform crime Reports UCR?For use by law enforcement, the Uniform Crime Reporting Program produces accurate information. Additionally, it offers information to the general public, the media, scholars, and criminal justice students. Since 1930, the program has been producing crime statistics.
The FBI's Uniform Crime Report "murder and nonnegligent manslaughter" data are so gravely erroneous that the only information they can give criminologists is the number of deaths that have been investigated by police as possibly being criminal homicides and the statistics on weapon use that have been reported by the UCR and the National Crime Survey.
A record of crimes reported to law enforcement agencies is kept in the Uniform Crime Report. The F.B.I. is in charge of data collection. compared to crimes that have not been solved.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more information about Uniform Crime Report, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14450134
#SPJ2
When not part of a school-endorsed function, the proper ratio
for supervising minors is one supervisor per 20 minors except in
cities of the first class (Philadelphia) where it is one supervisor
per 5 minors.
It is TRUE that the proper ratio for supervising minors is one supervisor per 20 minors except in cities of the first class (Philadelphia) where it is one supervisor per 5 minors.
What is the proper minors-supervisor ratio?In Philadelphia, the proper ratio for the supervision of minors is one supervisor for 5 minors.
However, in the remaining states, one supervisor can supervise up to twenty minors.
Thus, it is TRUE that when not part of a school-endorsed function, the proper ratio for supervising minors is one supervisor per 20 minors except in cities of the first class (Philadelphia) where it is one supervisor per 5 minors.
Learn more about the supervision of minors at https://brainly.com/question/23509933
#SPJ1
No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land. —Magna Carta, 1215
What best identifies a similar principle as it appears in the US government?
A the separation of powers designed in the Constitution
B due process protections as provided in the Constitution
C judicial review as established in the Marbury vs. Madison decision
D the belief in human equality as stated in the Declaration of Independence
Answer:
B) due process protections as provided in the Constitution
Explanation:
The most similar principle to the one stated in the Magna Carta. The Magna Carta, which was a charter of rights agreed to by King John of England in 1215, established the principle that no one, including the king, was above the law and that individuals had certain rights that the government could not take away. This principle is similar to the due process protections provided in the Constitution, which guarantee that the government must respect the legal rights of individuals and cannot deprive them of life, liberty, or property without fair and just procedures.
in which case did the supreme court determine that probation is a privilege and not a right?a. US v. Birnbaum (1970)b. Mempa v. Rhay (1967)c. Gagnon v. Scarpelli (1973)d. Bearden v. Georgia (1983)
The U.S. Supreme Court determined that probation is a privilege and not a right in the case of Mempa v. Rhay in 1967. The case involved a defendant who was sentenced to probation but later had that probation revoked without a formal hearing or notice.
The Court held that the defendant was entitled to a hearing before probation could be revoked and that probation is a privilege that can be taken away for cause. This case established the right of due process for probationers and highlighted the importance of procedural protections even for those who are not incarcerated.
Find out more about Court
brainly.com/question/31457463
#SPJ11
which of the following is an accurate comparison of how the supreme court has applied the doctrine of selective incorporation? (4 points) before engel v. vitale (1962) after engel v. vitale (1962) (a) the establishment clause does not apply to the states. the establishment clause applies to the states. (b) the bill of rights does not apply to the states. the bill of rights applies to the states. (c) the establishment clause limits the actions of the state governments. the establishment clause limits the action of the federal government. (d) the bill of rights was written to protect citizens from the federal government. the bill of rights was written to protect citizens from state governments.
The correct answer is (b): the bill of rights does not apply to the states. After Engel v. Vitale (1962), the bill of rights applies to the states.
Prior to Engel v. Vitale, the bill of rights did not apply to the states. The Fourteenth Amendment, which was passed in 1868, prohibits the states from violating the rights of individuals; however, the Supreme Court had not applied the provisions of the Bill of Rights to the states until 1962.
Engel v. Vitale (1962) was a landmark Supreme Court case that held that state-mandated prayer violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. This case established the doctrine of selective incorporation, which applies the Bill of Rights to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment.
The decision in Engel v. Vitale (1962) had a huge impact on the rights of individuals in the United States. By incorporating the Bill of Rights into state law, the Supreme Court was able to protect individuals from having their rights violated by state governments. This is an important protection for citizens of the United States, as state governments.
Know more about Fourteenth Amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/29371683
#SPJ11
Most illegal immigrants come from which country?
Mexico has been identified as the country from which the largest number of illegal immigrants come, particularly to the United States.
Mexico refers to a country that has been identified as a significant source of illegal immigrants, particularly in relation to the United States. Situated in North America, Mexico shares a border with the United States, making it geographically accessible for migration.
Economic factors, including limited job opportunities and lower wages in Mexico, often drive individuals to seek better prospects across the border.
Political and social factors, such as violence, corruption, and instability, also contribute to migration flows. The complex interplay of these factors makes Mexico a notable origin country for illegal immigration.
Learn more about immigrants here:
https://brainly.com/question/28791683
#SPJ6
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
When a commercial real estate sale has two Agent sales associates the broker may create a?
When a commercial real estate sale involves two agent sales associates working under a broker, the broker may create a co-brokerage agreement or a dual agency arrangement.
A co-brokerage agreement is a contractual agreement between two real estate brokers, each representing different parties involved in a transaction. In this case, the broker representing the seller and the broker representing the buyer collaborate to facilitate the sale. The agreement outlines the responsibilities, duties, and compensation arrangement between the two brokers.
Under a co-brokerage agreement, the brokers typically share information, work together to market the property, coordinate showings, negotiate terms, and assist in the closing process. The agreement specifies how the commission will be divided between the brokers, typically based on a predetermined percentage or a negotiated split.
On the other hand, a dual agency arrangement occurs when the broker represents both the buyer and the seller in a transaction. In this scenario, the broker acts as a neutral intermediary, facilitating the transaction while maintaining impartiality.
know more about intermediary here:
https://brainly.com/question/29732040
#SPJ8
Taking a deeper look at the debate of the death penalty, where you do stand on the debate between death and a life sentence (without parole)? There is no right or wrong answer, just make sure to defend your answer. The answer needs to be 4-6 sentences for full credit.
My stance on the death penalty is that if a person is able to take the life of another person then they can be made to face the death penalty as well.
What is the death penalty?This is the capital punishment that involves taking the life of another person because they have committed a grave crime.
Even though, I believe that the death penalty does not have to be carried for all levels of crime, I believe that it should be implemented in situations where people take the life of others on purpose.
If they take away the right to life of other people, losing theirs is a way of causing others to stay away from committing such crime.
Read more on death penalty here: https://brainly.com/question/509558
#SPJ1
Dona offers to sell her used sofa, chair, coffee table, end table, and lamp to Erma for $700. Erma responds that she will pay that price if Dona’s TV set is included. Neither party is a merchant. Their contract is formed according to a. whatever is reasonable. b. the new terms of the acceptance. c. none of the terms. d. the terms of the original offer.
D. The terms of the original offer.
Dona offers to sell her used sofa, chair, coffee table, end table, and lamp to Erma for $700. Erma responds that she will pay that price if Dona’s TV set is included. Neither party is a merchant. Their contract is formed according to the terms of the original offer. Thus, option (d) is correct.
What is contract?
An agreement between two or more people to do something is referred to as a contract. Two or more parties must agree to the terms of the agreement in order to create a legally binding commitment. A contract was the deal with the two parties are the agreed to the terms and the conditions.
Dona is offered the to sell her used sofa, chair, coffee table, end table, and lamp to Erma for $700. Ema was the suggested to also add the TV set are the pay for $700. The terms according to case are the original offer. Original Offer are those type of the contract are the purchased to the all the items or asset to the other parties.
Therefore, option (d) is correct.
Learn more about on contract, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ2
Why do people obey the law?
Answer:
The startling conclusion of Tom Tyler's classic study is that people obey the law because they believe it is legitimate, not because they fear punishment. Tyler suggests that lawmakers and law enforcement would be far better served by making legal systems worthy of respect rather than instilling fear of punishment. He discovers that people obey the law primarily because they believe in legitimate authority.
Answer:
to avoid crime and conflict
Paying taxes, voting, jury duty and obeying the laws are all examples of-
Personal Responsibilities
O Government Responsibilities
O Civic Responsibilities
O Mandatory Responsibilities
Answer:
Civic Responsibilities
Explanation:
A duty (also called an obligation) is something that a citizen is required to do, by law. Examples of duties/obligations are: obeying laws, paying taxes, defending the nation and serving on juries. Rule of Law: Everyone is under the law. To obey the law, you must know the law.
Answer:
Civic Responsibility
Explanation:
A taxpayer who underpays their tax due to negligence or disregard of the rules is subject to
a penalty of
Answer: The negligence penalty is 20% of the amount you underpaid
The IRS may impose the negligence penalty if it decides that a taxpayer's negligence or disregard of the rules or regulations caused an underpayment of taxes.
Explanation:
Answer:
deduct it from your wages or paycheck and also you can go to jail for tax invasion
Explanation:
Looking back at history, women often had very different protection under men, depending on which government ruled. Based on the origins of human right below, did it apply to women? Explain why and how in 150 to 200 words.
Women often had very different protection from men, they are dependent on their husbands as well as fathers before marriage, and their influence was limited to the boundaries of the home.
What is a human right?Human rights are some of the rights which are provided to every human despite of any discrimination based on age, gender, caste or religion. These rights include the right to have property, the right to freedom, and the right to express.
Historians speculate that Mycenae or Crete may have had matriarchal societies throughout the Bronze Age. Only the 18th century, with the beginning of the Enlightenment and the French Revolution, can be used to discuss the claim of the rights of women.
Learn more about women, here:
https://brainly.com/question/3451600
#SPJ1
Criminal charges made against an accused person and put in writing prior to their being put on trial, is called what?
Answer:
Indictment.
Explanation: