Answer and Explanation:
The theory of social learning states that the actions and ways of acting of young delinquents are the result of living with delinquent adults. This is because children have the ability to repeat the behavior of adults, taking for themselves the activities they do. Thus, according to this theory, young delinquents are victims of an inhospitable environment where they live with criminal adults and end up learning these practices.
Psychoanalytic theory, on the other hand, asserts that the acts, activities and personalities of young deliquesentes are innate elements of their id, ego and superego. This indicates that the criminal activities in which they are involved have been reasoned by their own minds and that, therefore, it is necessary to understand their personalities to reach a conclusion about their crimes.
In 1980 the Hawaii State Senate held hearings when it was considering a law requiring that motorcyclists wear helmets. Some motorcyclists testified that they had been in crashes in which helmets would not have been helpful. Which important group was not able to testify?
In 1980 the Hawaii State Senate held hearings when it was considering a law requiring that motorcyclists wear helmets. The important group that was not able to testify in this case was the deceased individuals who had died due to head injuries in motorcycle crashes. They were not able to testify about the importance of wearing a helmet while riding a motorcycle.
What is a helmet?A helmet is a protective headgear that is made to protect the head from injuries while engaging in activities such as riding motorcycles, bicycles, or skateboarding. It is crucial to wear a helmet while riding a motorcycle or any other vehicle because helmets provide the necessary head protection during accidents. They have an outer shell that helps in dispersing the force of the impact and an inner lining that absorbs shock.
What are the consequences of not wearing a helmet while riding a motorcycle?There are several consequences of not wearing a helmet while riding a motorcycle. Some of them include:
Head injury: If a motorcyclist is not wearing a helmet, they are more likely to suffer from head injuries during an accident.
Spinal cord injuries: If a motorcyclist suffers from spinal cord injuries, it can cause permanent disabilities or even death.
The loss of quality of life: The loss of quality of life refers to the impact that a head injury or any other injury might have on the individual's life, such as their ability to work, take care of their family, and their daily activities.
learn more about motorcycle crashes
https://brainly.com/question/31553768
#SPJ11
What tactic did famous crime bosses like Edward Teach and Carlo Gambino MOST likely use to keep order in their organizations?
An act of committing organized crime are the tactics used by crime bosses such as Edward Teach and Carlo Gambino
Who is Edward Teach and Carlo Gambino?Edward Teach was one of the most fear sea pirates and Carlo Gambino was the head of a crime organization in U.S.
An organized crime means a continuing criminal enterprise that works by profiting from an illicit activities.
In conclusion, the act of committing organized crime are the tactics used by crime bosses such as Edward Teach and Carlo Gambino.
Read more about organized crime
brainly.com/question/8451608
which of the following statements is true regarding the current u.s. incarceration rate?
The correct statement regarding the current U.S. incarceration rate is "The United States has one of the highest incarceration rates in the world." The United States indeed has one of the highest incarceration rates globally.
The U.S. incarceration rate was approximately 639 per 100,000 population, which is significantly higher than most other countries. This high incarceration rate has raised concerns about the effectiveness of the criminal justice system, issues of overcrowding in prisons, and the disproportionate impact on marginalized communities.
It's important to note that the specific statistics and rankings may vary over time, so it is advisable to refer to the latest available data from reliable sources for the most up-to-date information on the U.S. incarceration rate.
To learn more about U.S. Incarceration, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14839850
#SPJ11
The correct statement regarding the current U.S. incarceration rate is "The United States has one of the highest incarceration rates in the world." The United States indeed has one of the highest incarceration rates globally.
The U.S. incarceration rate was approximately 639 per 100,000 population, which is significantly higher than most other countries. This high incarceration rate has raised concerns about the effectiveness of the criminal justice system, issues of overcrowding in prisons, and the disproportionate impact on marginalized communities.
It's important to note that the specific statistics and rankings may vary over time, so it is advisable to refer to the latest available data from reliable sources for the most up-to-date information on the U.S. incarceration rate.
To learn more about U.S. Incarceration, click here:
brainly.com/question/14839850
#SPJ11
In the lawsuit referred to where a 12 year old girl prone to seizures and taking marijuana as medicine, is suing the Federal Government and the DEA, what can the defendants use to win this case
Answer:
The options are;
A. Commerce clause
B. The Separation of powers clause
C.The First Amendment
D. The Supremacy clause
The answer is D. The Supremacy clause
Explanation:
In the lawsuit which involved a 12 year old girl prone to seizures and taking marijuana as medicine suing the Federal Government and the DEA, the defendants are the Federal Government and DEA and the only way they can win the case is by applying the Supremacy clause which states that Federal laws are superior to State laws.
Although some states have legalized the use of marijuana, the Federal Government still considers the use of marijuana as illegal.
The primary source of federal power to regulate trade between states is the.
The primary source of federal power to regulate trade between states is the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.
This clause, found in Article 1, Section 8, gives Congress the authority to regulate commerce among the several states. This means that Congress can pass laws that regulate the flow of goods, services, and people between states, as well as laws that govern interstate transactions. The Commerce Clause has been interpreted broadly by the Supreme Court, allowing Congress to regulate a wide range of economic activities that affect interstate commerce. However, there have been challenges to this power, with some arguing that it infringes on states' rights and others arguing that it gives the federal government too much power. Nonetheless, the Commerce Clause remains a crucial source of federal power in regulating trade between states.
To know more about Constitution visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ11
russian gangsters have long been involved in the production and sale of what powerful drug?
Russian gangsters have long been involved in the production and sale of heroin.
Heroin is a powerful opioid drug derived from morphine, which is extracted from the opium poppy plant. It is known for its highly addictive properties and potent effects on the central nervous system.
The involvement of Russian gangsters in the heroin trade can be attributed to several factors. Firstly, Russia is geographically located near major heroin-producing regions, such as Afghanistan, which is the largest global producer of opium. The proximity provides opportunities for illicit drug trafficking.
Secondly, the collapse of the Soviet Union and subsequent economic and political instability created an environment conducive to organized crime. Russian gangsters took advantage of this situation and established extensive networks involved in various illegal activities, including drug production and trafficking.
Additionally, the high demand for heroin both within Russia and internationally contributes to the profitability of the drug trade. The addictive nature of heroin fuels a continuous market, making it a lucrative venture for criminal organizations.
Russian gangsters have been heavily involved in the production and sale of heroin. Their geographical proximity to major heroin-producing regions, the social and economic conditions in Russia, and the demand for the drug contribute to their participation in this illegal trade. The heroin trade poses significant challenges for law enforcement agencies in combating organized crime and addressing the public health consequences of drug addiction.
To know more about heroin, visit
https://brainly.com/question/32178785
#SPJ11
Discuss Saudi judicial system that is followed by basic trial
procedures (in 300 to 500 words)
Saudi Arabia is an Islamic state, and its judicial system for both criminal and civil cases is based on Islamic law (Shari'ah). The King is at the apex of the legal system, serving as the final court of appeal and a source of pardon.
Saudi Arabia's legal system is based on Sharia, Islamic law based on the Qur'an and the Sunnah (traditions) of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. Sharia's sources also include Islamic scholarly consensus formed after Muhammad's death. Its interpretation by Saudi judges is influenced by the mediaeval texts for the literalist Hanbali school of Islamic law. Saudi Arabia is the only Muslim country that has adopted Sharia in its uncodified form. This, combined with a lack of judicial precedent, has created significant uncertainty about the scope and content of the country's laws.
Learn more about Saudi Arabia, here:
https://brainly.com/question/15174193
#SPJ4
You are using Lexis and want to find a case that discusses burglary multiple times within the document. The best way to do this is:
Group of answer choices
“Burglary”
Burglary w/p Burglary
Burglary AND Burglary AND Burglary
Atl5(burglary)
The best way to find a case that discusses burglary multiple times within the document using Lexis is to use the search term "Burglary" multiple times with the AND operator between them, like this: "Burglary AND Burglary".
What is the import of this?This will ensure that the search results include documents that mention the term "burglary" more than once.
Using the search term "Burglary w/p Burglary" will only find documents that have the phrase "burglary with intent to commit" in them, which may not be what you're looking for.
Using the search term "Atl5(burglary)" would search for the term "burglary" within the 5 words proximity of the term "ATL," which is not likely to be useful for this search.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above. It could then be concluded that the best way is to use the search term "Burglary" multiple times with the AND operator between them, like this: "Burglary AND Burglary".
learn more about word search: https://brainly.com/question/26867423
#SPJ1
Edie files a suit against Frank. If this suit is like most cases, it will be
a. dismissed during a trial.
b. dismissed or settled before a trial
c. resolved only after a trial.
d. settled at a trial
In a typical legal case where Edie files a suit against Frank, it is likely that the case will be dismissed or settled before a trial takes place. Option B is correct.
This is because the majority of legal cases are resolved through settlements or dismissals rather than going to trial. Settlements occur when the parties involved negotiate an agreement to resolve the dispute without going to trial. Dismissals can happen for a variety of reasons, such as lack of evidence, procedural errors, or voluntary dismissal by the plaintiff.
Trials are usually seen as a last resort, as they can be time-consuming and expensive for all parties involved. Additionally, trials can be unpredictable, and the outcome is ultimately in the hands of a judge or jury. Overall, the legal system aims to resolve disputes in the most efficient and fair manner possible, and settling or dismissing a case before a trial is often the preferred method.
Option B holds true.
Learn more about legal cases: https://brainly.com/question/26718803
#SPJ11
1. What ethical guidelines will the soft drink
company need to follow to market a drink in
the UK (United Kingdom)?
One ethical guideline that soft drink companies follow to market in the United Kingdom is not to advertise to children under 16 years in some media.
What are ethical guidelines?Ethical guidelines are rules that must be observed in doing business to minimize breaking business ethical guidelines.
Ethical guidelines define actions that are morally right or wrong. The guidelines are provided to be followed to avoid violations and their consequences.
Thus, a soft drink company marketing a drink in the United Kingdom must follow ethical guidelines, including:
Ensuring proper labeling of their products. Indication of product contents, production and expiration dates, and other warnings.Learn more about ethical marketing at https://brainly.com/question/16025718
What is the most important part of the trial proceedings? Why?
Answer:
Jury selection is the most important aspect of any jury trial, yet it is also the more frequently misunderstood aspect, for which the least amount of time is dedicated towards. There are no “rules” for jury selection, and very little, if any, guidelines offered by the judge.
Explanation:
does anyone know who is ronaldo the judge is asking
Answer: #\(Game On\)
Explanation:
Cristiano Ronaldo
Which situation would not be considered a civil law case?
a. A married couple getting divorced.
b. An employee steals products from their employer.
c. A customer slips on a wet floor inside a restaurant.
Answer:
A civil case is when a person or business claims to have been harmed by the actions of another person or business.
Explanation:
so it should be b
Select the correct answer.
When a responder fails to take action when they have a legal responsibility to act, this is called:
A.
Neglect
B.
Abandonment
C.
Good Samaritan
D.
Consent
Answer:
A, neglect
Explanation:
All the other ones were talking about giving up something(abandonment),being responsible( good Samaritan), Having an approval to do something specific(Consent) But, from all of those Neglect was the one not being responsible in fear and being an able to take actions.
Discuss and summarize the importance of building laws and codes
to the architecture practice.
The importance of building laws and codes to the architecture practice is that it ensures the safety, health, and welfare of the public by providing minimum standards for the design, construction, and maintenance of buildings.
Building codes are a set of regulations that must be followed when constructing buildings to ensure that they meet minimum standards for safety, fire protection, energy efficiency, and other critical areas. Architects are required to stay up-to-date with the latest building codes and regulations to ensure that their designs meet the minimum standards and comply with local laws. Failure to comply with building codes and regulations can result in fines, legal action, or even loss of life. Therefore, building laws and codes are crucial to the architecture practice to ensure the safety and well-being of the public.
To learn more about building code visit: https://brainly.com/question/31032521
#SPJ11
According to the law, crimes are statutory offenses; this essentially means that:
A. courts may assess punitive damages in order to punish the wrongdoer.
B. the prevention of crime should include deterrence and rehabilitation.
C. it must be proved that the crime is dangerous or detrimental to society
D. a behavior is not a crime unless a state legislature has criminalized it.
E. individuals do not approve of the action being criminalized.
D. According to the law, crimes are statutory offenses, which essentially means that a behavior is not a crime unless a state legislature has criminalized it.
Statutory offenses refer to offenses that are defined and prohibited by law. It means that an act can only be considered a crime if it has been expressly defined as such by the legislature. This is in contrast to common law offenses, which are offenses that have been developed over time by courts based on judicial decisions.
The concept of statutory offenses is an important one in criminal law, as it helps to ensure that individuals are only punished for behavior that has been specifically prohibited by the legislature. This helps to prevent arbitrary or unjust prosecutions, and ensures that individuals are only held accountable for behavior that is clearly defined as criminal under the law.
Therefore, option D is the correct answer.
Learn more about statutory offenses here:
https://brainly.com/question/15520015
#SPJ11
The Freedom of Information Act exception regarding gas or oil wells was designed to
limit drilling of oil wells.
prevent competition from getting an unfair advantage.
allow the government to better control where drilling occurred.
provide an exception to encourage these important American industries.
Answer:
prevent competition from getting an unfair advantage.
Explanation:
The Freedom of Information Act exception regarding gas or oil wells was designed to prevent competition from getting an unfair advantage.
This Act has Exemption 9 in effect in order to protect the oil companies from having unfair advantage over each other.
This concern was valid because they believed that oil explorations by some private oil companies would give speculators an advantage.
Answer:
prevent competition from getting an unfair advantage.
Explanation:
The Freedom of Information Act exception regarding gas or oil wells was designed to prevent competition from getting an unfair advantage.
What is the administrative law?
Answer:
Administrative law is the law that governs the administrative actions. ... It governs the executive and ensures that the executive treats the public fairly. Administrative law is a branch of public law. It deals with the relationship of individuals with the government.
Explanation:
Answer:
Administrative law is the law that governs administrative actions. It governs the executive and ensures that the executive treats the public fairly. Administrative law is a branch of public law. It deals with the relationship of individuals with the government.
Explanation:
100% on Edge. 2022
Which of the following is a situation in which the probability of a victim of an accident being helped by observers is the highest? a. The victim and the observers are in a big city. b. The victim is of a different race from the observers. c. The observers have just enjoyed a nice meal. d. The observers are not hurried.
The situation in which the probability of a victim of an accident being helped by observers is the highest is d. The observers are not hurried.
Research has shown that bystanders are more likely to help a victim when they are not in a rush or preoccupied with their own tasks. Other factors such as the location and race of the victim have been shown to have no significant impact on the likelihood of receiving help. Therefore, it is important for observers to take their time and prioritize helping the victim in an accident. The likelihood of an accident victim being assisted by witnesses is highest in situation (d). The watchers take their time.
To know more about Research, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24174276
#SPJ11
Based on the above statement regarding the development of nationalism, how thus, it contributes to our present situation?
Nationalism is an idea and movement that holds that the nation should be congruent with the state. As a movement, nationalism tends to promote the interests of a particular nation (as in a group of people), especially with the aim of gaining and maintaining the nation's sovereignty (self-governance) over its homeland.
Nationalism is the belief that your own country is better than all others. Sometimes nationalism makes people not want to work with other countries to solve shared problems. Patriotism is a healthy pride in your country that brings about feelings of loyalty and a desire to help other citizens.
Mary, Janet and Shantil formed a partnership, Brookdale Senior Care (BSC), to provide temporary housing and general care for elderly people in Memphis, Tennessee. One of the temporary residents left the stove on and burned down the house, which resulted in the loss of the entire building and contents. One of the residents, Francine, sued BSC and obtained a judgment of $ 30,000 against it, but the partnership could not pay the judgment
The option that Francine has since the partnership cannot get the 30000 would be to have assets that are worth this amount from the partnership.
What is a partnership?This is the type of business between two or more people were the parties have to share in the risks, the profits and the loss of the business.
Francine can get the assets from BSC given that this is a partnership and other it, all of the partners have the same liability
Complete question
Mary, Janet and Shantil formed a partnership, Brookdale Senior Care (BSC), to provide temporary housing and general care for elderly people in Memphis, Tennessee. One of the temporary residents left the stove on and burned down the house, which resulted in the loss of the entire building and contents. One of the residents, Francine, sued BSC and obtained a judgment of $ 30,000 against it, but the partnership could not pay the judgment.
What are Francine’s options if the Brookdale partnership cannot pay the $30,000?
Read more on partnership here:
https://brainly.com/question/25012970
#SPJ1
he biggest legal worry haunting editors and publishers today is the possibility of being sued for libel, a form of expression that, unlike political speech, is not protected under which amendment?
1. Fifth
2. Sixth
3. Nineteenth
4. First
The First Amendment does not provide protection for libel, which is a major concern for editors and publishers in terms of potential lawsuits.
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the freedom of speech, press, religion, assembly, and petition. However, this protection is not absolute, and certain forms of expression, including libel, are not covered by the First Amendment.
Libel refers to false and defamatory statements that are published or communicated to a third party, resulting in harm to a person's reputation. Unlike political speech or other forms of expression that enjoy greater protection under the First Amendment.
To learn more about First Amendment click here : brainly.com/question/16963840
#SPJ11
Select the true statement about the relationship between law, ethics, and business.
As a rule, the judges can and do make different decisions in cases before them by distinguishing previous cases that might have applied before’. Which law tradition does NOT belong to this principle mainly?
Answer:
For long it has been the received opinion that judges filled in the gaps left by rules by using their discretion. Positivistic jurisprudence from Austin to Hart placed strong emphasis on the part played by judges in the exercise of their discretion. "In these cases it is clear", Hart has said, "that the rule-making authority must exercise discretion, and there is no possibility of treating the question raised by the various cases as if there were one uniquely correct answer to be found, as distinct from an answer which is a reasonable compromise between many conflicting interests". A competing view was espoused by the realists who placed absolute emphasis on the discretion of judges and relegated the "rules" to an obscure position. Earlier, little attention was paid to the analysis of discretion. However, a determined effort has been made lately by Ronald Dworkin, who has cast serious doubts on the orthodox opinion and has emerged as the principal opponent of Hart. Dworkin's views have posed a sustained challenge to the positivist account and have received critical acclaim by leading jurists of the world.
how did Trent foster ryes reluctance to communicate
Answer:
Mr. Trent fostered Rye's reluctance by going around her and telling everyone how good a job she was doing and indicated that he wanted to hire her on a full-time .
Explanation:
In an initiative, the source of the law is
the court
the voters.
the governor
the legislature
Answer: the voters
Explanation:
Answer:
IT'S B
Explanation:
Once points are on your driving record, they will stay there for at least.
Answer:
12 months
Explanation:
I think
Answer:
five years
Explanation:
your welcome
How many repeats are there for this STR? Refer to the following DNA sequence to answer the questions: CTAGAAGCTTAAAGCTTCATCATCATCATCATCATCATTTAAGCTTCAAAGCTT
Answer:
The number of repeats within an STR is referred to as an allele. For instance, the STR known as D7S820, found on chromosome 7, contains between 5 and 16 repeats of GATA. Therefore, there are 12 different alleles possible for the D7S820 STR.
Imagine the federal government has a national debt of $12. 6 trillion. Congress's budget for the coming year includes a spending projection of $5. 1 trillion. Tax revenue is expected to be $4. 8 billion. Which fiscal policy should congress adopt to avoid increasing the national debt? lower taxes. Increase funding. Decrease spending. No change is necessary.
Given that spending is anticipated to exceed tax revenue in the upcoming year, legislators should implement an austerity-based fiscal strategy to prevent the national debt from rising.
In order to achieve this, government spending would need to be decreased in order to match tax income. Making changes to government programs and services would undoubtedly be necessary, and doing so may be contentious and politically challenging.It would be vital, nevertheless, to prevent adding to the nation's already significant debt.There are a few measures Congress might take to stop the growth of the national debt. Spending might be reduced by $300 billion as one alternative. This might be accomplished by cutting the funding for each department and agency of government.
learn more about national debt here:
brainly.com/question/22684204
#SPJ4
List of Cons of Insanity Defense?
List of Cons of Insanity Defense
It is abolished in some jurisdictions. Take note that insanity defense is not accepted at all jurisdictions in all courts. ...
It can lead to increased trial costs. ...
It can be very difficult to prove.
The mental disorder defense, also referred to as the insanity defense, is an affirmative defense by excuse in a criminal case that contends the defendant is not accountable for their actions because they were suffering from an episodic psychiatric illness at the time of the criminal act.
This is in contrast to an excuse of provocation, where the defendant is still accountable but the accountability is mitigated by a passing mental state. [1]: 613 A civil ruling in trusts and estates that declares a will invalid because it was created when a testator's mental disorder prevented him or her from recognizing the natural objects is contrasted with a decision that a defendant in a criminal case cannot stand trial because a mental illness prevents them from effectively assisting counsel.
To know more about Defence here
https://brainly.com/question/29542705
#SPJ4